This document contains a 15 question quiz on topics related to autobiographical memory and eyewitness testimony from a PSY 352 class. The questions cover topics like weapon focus effect, Conway's self-memory model, techniques for assessing memory accuracy, childhood memory verification, Proust phenomenon, and the reminiscence bump. The quiz aims to test understanding of key concepts and findings from research on autobiographical and eyewitness memory.
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
PSY 352 Week 3 Quiz Memory and Autobiographical Details
1. PSY 352 Week 3 Quiz NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/psy-352-ash/psy-352-
week-3-quiz-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
PSY 352 Week 3 Quiz NEW
Question 1
If an eyewitness to a crime experiences a weapon focus, he or
she will be:
more likely to remember information about the gun, but less
likely to remember what the person is wearing
more likely to remember what the person is wearing, but less
likely to remember information about the gun
more likely to remember peripheral details, but less likely to
remember central details
equally likely to remember peripheral and central details
Question 2
2. When recalling an autobiographical memory, Conway’s self-
memory systems says that:
we access sensory-perceptual details at the level of lifetime
periods
we reconstruct the event starting from event-specific
knowledge, then general events, and finally lifetimeperiods
we reconstruct the event starting from lifetime periods, then
general events, and finally accessing event specific knowledge
retrieval of autobiographical memories is fast and accurate
Question 3
Which of these autobiographical memory research techniques
allows for firmer conclusions about memoryaccuracy?
targeted event recall
diary technique
cue word technique
public record assessment
3. Question 4
People often tout the power of smells as cues for
autobiographical memories. How does empirical researchstack
up on this issue?
Olfactory cues produce more detailed memories than do non-
olfactory cues.
Olfactory cues produce more recent memories than do non-
olfactory cues.
Olfactory cues produce more vivid memories than do non-
olfactory cues.
Olfactory cues tend to produce flashbulb memories.
Question 5
One research strategy for investigating childhood memories (in
order to check and verify the accuracy ofremembered
childhood events) is to:
investigate participants' pasts to confirm the events they
remember
4. ask about salient events that can be easily corroborated by
other parties
stage events that can be asked about later on
there is no way to corroborate any childhood memory.
Question 6
The Proust phenomenon is:
the power of odors to elicit memories that are especially old
and vivid
the ability of odors to generate more detailed memories
using olfactory odors to generate autobiographical facts
the ability of odors to generate very early memories in life
Question 7
In their study of early childhood memories, Usher and Neisser
(1993) found that:
family stories and photographs helped the memories of all
children
5. family stories and photographs hurt the memories of all
children
family stories and photographs hurt the memories of children
four and older
family stories and photographs hurt the memories of children
three years and younger
Question 8
Relating details of personally experienced events makes us
seem more believable and truthful, and tends to make us more
persuasive. This assertion relates to which function of
autobiographical memory?
emotional
informational
communicative
directive
Question 9
6. The "general events" level of representation in
autobiographical memory bears a strong resemblance to:
the subordinate level of category representation
the superordinate level of category representation
the basic level of category representation
the notion of an exemplar in category representation
Question 10
Williams (1994) attempted to corroborate individual cases of
lost traumatic memories by finding individualswho had been
admitted 17 years earlier to sexual abuse clinics and
interviewing them about their current knowledge of the
experience. The findings are interpreted as evidence ____ the
reality of repressed then recovered memories because __________:
for; over 1/3 failed to remember the event for which they had
been admitted.
for; all of them failed to remember the event for which they had
been admitted.
7. against; all of them vividly remembered the event for which
they had been admitted.
Question 11
All of the following statements about the misinformation effect
are true except:
It is an example of the memory sin of suggestibility.
It is an example of the memory sin of misattribution.
It is an example of retroactive interference.
It is an example of the memory sin of bias.
Question 12
Marian and Neisser (2000) conducted a study in which Russian
immigrants to the United States were givenRussian or English
cue words for autobiographical memories. The results of this
8. study provided a conceptual replication of this classic memory
phenomenon in the context of autobiographical memory:
a levels of processing effect
the beneficial effect of organization on memory
encoding specificity
a dissociation between implicit and explicit memory
Question 13
According to the Innocence Project, eyewitness
misidentification plays a key role in ___ of the cases of wrongful
conviction in which DNA evidence later led to exoneration.
about 25%
about 50%
about 75%
all
Question 14
9. The reminiscence bump refers to the finding that ________ and
seems to apply ________.
people show a standard forgetting curve for the last several
years of their autobiography; only to episodicmemory
people show a standard forgetting curve for the last several
years of their autobiography; to both episodicand semantic
memory
people tend to recall a disproportionate number of events from
between ages 10 to 30; only to episodicmemory
people tend to recall a disproportionate number of events from
between ages 10 to 30; to both episodic and semantic memory
Question 15
Garry and Wade compared the effects of photos and narratives
in producing false memories and found that:
both were about equally likely to lead to false remembering.
neither one led to much false remembering.
narratives led to more false remembering than did photos.
10. photos led to more false remembering than did narratives.