jaipur

1. Group Members-
Shobhana Tiwari
Sonika Rawat
Arnav Sarswat
Akshay Sharma
Ruchi Khandelwal
Kumari Neha
Bhawani Shankar1
Submitted To-
Dr.Lokesh Vijayvargy

2. 2

3. 3USE OF AHP
QUALITY
MANAGEMNET

4. 4

5. ONLINE
(50 forms)
OFFLINE
(300 forms)
5

6. 6
EEVALUATION
CCONVERSION
CALCULATION
RECOMMENDATION

7. 7
PULSAR HUNK
F-Z (150)
R-15 (150)
APACHE

8. 8
PLACEOF SURVEY
•India Gate,
•Khumba marg,
•Pratapnagar and
•Gaurav Tower.

9. PRICE MILEAGE STYLE
TOP SPEED MAINTINANCE
RESALE
VALUE
9

10. SCORE ASSUMPTIONS for CRITERIA
1 VERY STRONGLY DISAGREE
2 STRONGLY DISAGREE
3 DISAGREE
4 CAN’T SAY
5 AGREE
6 STRONGLY AGREE
7 VERY STRONGLY AGREE
SCORE
ASSUMPTIONS for
ALTERNATIVES
1 Poor
2 Below average
3 Average
4 Can’t say
5 Good
6 Very Good
7 Excellent
10

11. 11
Criteria Price Mileage Style
Top
speed
Mainten
ance
Re-sale
value Priority
Price 0.176 0.176 0.175 0.176 0.176 0.176 0.176
Mileage 0.172 0.170 0.173 0.170 0.170 0.170 0.171
Style 0.172 0.172 0.171 0.172 0.172 0.172 0.172
Top speed 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163
Maintenance 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163
Re-sale value 0.154 0.154 0.153 0.154 0.155 0.154 0.154

12. 12
Step - 1
Criteria Sum Priority λ
Price 1.054 0.176 5.994
Mileage 1.025 0.171 5.994
Style 1.030 0.172 5.994
Top speed 0.977 0.163 5.994
Maintenance 0.986 0.163 6.051
Re-sale value 0.923 0.154 5.994
Step - 2 n 6
λ1 5.994
λ2 5.994
λ3 5.994 n RI
λ4 5.994 3 0.58
λ5 6.051 4 0.9
λ6 5.994 5 1.12
λmax (Average) 6.004 6 1.24
7 1.32
8 1.41
Step - 3
CI = (λmax-n)/n-1 0.00072
Step - 4
CR = CI/RI 0.00058
Priority is correct

13. 13
Priority 0.176 0.171 0.172 0.163 0.163 0.154
Price Mileage Style Top speed Maintenance
Re-sale
value
Final
score
Pulsar 0.208 0.181 0.206 0.000 0.209 0.187 0.166
R15 0.188 0.215 0.203 0.000 0.205 0.184 0.166
FZ 0.207 0.189 0.202 0.000 0.193 0.204 0.166
Apache 0.201 0.213 0.193 0.193 0.196 0.214 0.201
Hunk 0.196 0.202 0.196 0.213 0.198 0.212 0.202
Pulsar 0.166
R15 0.166
FZ 0.166
Apache 0.201
Hunk 0.202
Overall score of Hunk is highest. So
customer is preferring Hunk.

14. 14
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
Pulsar
R15
FZ
Apache
Hunk

15. 15

16. 16
0.166 0.166 0.166
0.201 0.202
Chart Title
Series1

17. 17
The Analytical Hierarchy
Process uses scientific proof for
evaluation of different criteria.
It differs from conventional
decision analysis methodologies
by not requiring users to make
numerical guesses.
Cannot be used where decision
problems are not be structured
hierarchically.

18. 18
AHP is by far the most
commonly used multi criteria
decision making model since
its formulation by Saaty and
Kearns in 1985.
Hence, using AHP we
conclude that, considering
various criteria like price,
speed, style, mileage,
maintenance and re sale
value Hunk is the best bike
for youth in Jaipur.

19. 19
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mot
orcycling
http://www.motorcyclesurvey.com/
http://motorbikewriter.com/did-you-win-in-our-motorbike-
survey/
http://www.righttoride.co.uk/virtuallibrary/technical/07102
3-R-Ridersurveyreport-1.pdf
http://greater-london.mag-
uk.org/motorcycle_survey.php

20. 20
I came to know how to use advance excel.-Sonika Rawat
It was a great learning how to use AHP- Bhawani Shankar
We came to know about consumer behaviour towards
different bikes on different criteria's- Shobhana Tiwari
I came to know how to do market survey- Akshay Sharma
Great experience of interacting with customers- Kumari Neha
I came to know more about bikes and my passion for
bikes increased- Arnav Saraswat
My knowledge increased more about market
surveys- Ruchi Khandelwal

21. THANK
YOU 21