Delivered a report in January 2018 on technology roadmap for 3-5 years and commercial deployment options
Mention T809 work on demand for operational data e.g. CCTV was main driver for demand in 2010
DfT have already identified the expected consumption and developed KPIs that address passenger connectivity needs. The aim was to be able to deliver 1 Mbps per passenger across
7 in 10 passengers to be able to use the service at the same time
95% of all trains to deliver same service level during the busy hour
The workshop output from T1138 found a large number of use cases and business cases
These services are dependent on ubiquitous connectivity along all rail routes to maximise benefits
Which one of these business cases will mmWave bands enable
Everyone want’s coverage everywhere
Bandwidth – NRT 5Mbps – TOC @ 20Mbps – Passengers the rest -
MASSIVE opportunities from changing processes – takes time and connectivity (eg: TfL 5 years) – predictive track/train maintenance
Passengers & freight interoperate with other networks – seamless connectivity with other forms of transport
Needs to work – Delays/disruption recovery MOST needed – personalized information
NRT – no additional risk
They won’t get anywhere 1 Gbps today but may be in a couple of years
This slide talks about the potential peak demand that could be present along 1km piece of track. This provides the capacity density that could potentially need to be served along the different parts of the rail corridor. This essentially shapes the size of the network to be deployed
ASSUMPTIONS:
Urban: Support up to 20 trains simultaneously per km of route
Suburban: Support up to 10 trains simultaneously per km of route
Intercity: Support up to 5 trains simultaneously per km of route
Rural: Support up to 2 trains simultaneously per km of route
SF to present this slide
Licensed and licence-exempt spectrum available today.
Licensed spectrum used today by TOCs to connect backhaul to trains
Bandwidth constrained and data consumption limitations (more of a commercial factor)
Licence exempt spectrum is not currently used to connect trains but there are two trials Project Swift (5 GHz) and Project Mantra (60 GHz)
Name check the DCMS 5G Trials and Test beds contest. Promoting the sharing of spectrum
26 GHz, 28 GHz and 60 GHz and some vendors want to do rail trials
Pseudo private network which prioritises the train itself as a user
Need to mention new steerable beam antenna technologies which are being researched and developed today which will likely be in place within the 3-5 year timeframe
Where is the cell edge going to be? Easy to know if starting from scratch but do we need to start from scratch?
Will it be a blend of architectures and solutions and once trackside infrastructure is deployed how will mmWave be supported
Large terminal station
MNOs – Cover stations (maybe) – no need for trackside access – and perhaps some RAN overlap with rail
MEASUREMENT – what kind of coverage is this?
MAX – 300mbps shared ALL handsets in cell range
GATEWAY “looks like” a handset
TOC – has to buy backhaul from MNO – at PAYG data rates – monthly limits with overage – custom pricing…
Have a think about where the greatest demand will be
New technology invented
Dedicated train backhaul
Bonding 300Mbps channels
Needs towers to locate equipment
There are solutions such as Airspan who provide a cheap product that could be deployed every 400m (60 GHz today) to delivery ultra high capacity along the whole route
Would not have mmWave deployed along the entire route especially across all long distance – what are the economics and do they stack up. Researc has been done for other bands but not mmWave
Will be strategically deployed at terminal stations
Targeting capacity where it is needed such as hot spot areas.
High congested areas on approach to terminal, busy stations large portions of commuter routes
Capacity infills along the route – dependent on route, might be all along commuter routes
STANDARD PRODUCT
Potential to aggregate demand
MNOs – provide service to all rail (and non-rail) customers – LTE
OLOs – specific – rural BB
Train manufacturers & tech (cisco etc)
TOC could contract for ALL connectivity on route
Telent/Atos – nationwide service providers – ticketing – station monitoring
NR - GSM-R - monitoring