This document summarizes a presentation about a novel "knock-in" mouse model that expresses a catalytically inactive form of tissue transglutaminase (TG2). The TG2-C277S mouse model was developed using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to mutate the active site cysteine residue of TG2. Biochemical analysis showed the mutant TG2 lacked crosslinking activity but retained GTP binding ability. Preliminary analysis found the TG2-C277S mice expressed normal levels of TG2 protein and its interaction with integrins and fibronectin were preserved. This novel mouse model will provide insights into TG2 functions in vascular aging independent of its enzymatic crosslinking activity.
Vascular Aging – New Lessons From a Novel "Knock-In" Mouse Model
1. Lakshmi Santhanam, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Anesthesiology and Critical
Care Medicine
Scintica Instrumentation
Phone: +1 (519) 914 5495
sales@scintica.com
Vascular Aging – New
Lessons From a Novel
“Knock-In” Mouse Model
2. Vascular Aging – New Lessons
From a Novel “Knock-In” Mouse
Model
Lakshmi Santhanam, Ph.D.
Department of Anesthesiology & CCM
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
3. Objectives
• Mechanical perspective of vascular structure and function
• Understand the biophysical, biochemical, and cellular
hallmarks of vascular stiffening
• Tissue transglutaminase as a target in vascular aging
• Determine TG2’s mechanisms of action in the vasculature
• Understand cellular vs. matrix contributions to overall PWV in
mouse models.
4. Vascular Stiffness – Mechanical Perspective
The aorta as a non-linelarly viscoelastic material
Systole - Expansion
energy storage
Diastole – elastic recoil
unidirectional blood flow 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠; 𝜎 =
𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛; 𝜆 =
𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑂𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 =
𝑑𝜆
𝑑𝑡
Loading – increasing stress
Unloading – decreasing stress
Einc depends on
Distending pressureWang et al (2016)
5. Load-bearing elements of the vascular wall
Elastic part: ECM
• Elastin fiber integrity
• Elastin/Collagen ratio
Elastin engages at low distension
Collagen engages at high distention
Physiologic range of pressure engages both
Viscous part: Incompletely understood
• Cell content
• VSMC tone
Shadwick (1995)
J. Exp. Biol 202:3305–3313
Wolinsky and Glagov (1964)
Circ Res. 14:400–413
6. Vascular Compliance – An Essential
Element of Overall Cardiovascular Health
Compliant Stiff
Windkessel
effect
Pulsatile flow input Steady flow
• Minimizes pump work needed
• Avoids cyclic loading/unloading of end organs –
protects from flow induced damage
• Optimal transport across capillaries
7. Pulse Wave Velocity – an Index of in
vivo Vascular Stiffness
Image from indusinstruments.com
𝑃𝑊𝑉
=
𝐸𝑖𝑛𝑐ℎ
𝐷𝜌
Where
Einc = incremental elastic modulus
h = wall thickness
D= lumen diameter
𝜌 = blood density
Moens Korteweg equation:
• Longitudinal studies
• Minimal discomfort to
mouse
• No damage to vasculature
can be used for ex vivo
measures
Doppler PWV:
Non-invasive PWV measurement
8. 20 40 60 80 100 120
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
MAP (mmHg)
PWV(m/s)
SNP infusion
PE infusion
L
Transducer 1
Transducer 2
Catheter
Catheter
Drug infusion
(PE to 120 mm Hg; SNP to 50 mm Hg)
ECG
d2P/dt2
PWV = L/Δt
Δt
Proximal wave
Distal wave
Einc = Incremental elastic modulus
h = wall thickness
r = radius of vessel
ρ = blood density
Moens – Korteweg Equation:
MAP dependence of Pulse Wave Velocity:
Simultaneous PWV-MAP Measurement (Invasive)
If HTN Is noted, PWV must be corrected for or
normalized against MAP
10. European Heart Journal, Volume 31, Issue 19, October 2010, Pages 2338–2350, EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM
Pulse Wave Velocity Increases with Age and Hypertension
N = 11,092 subjectsN = 1455 subjects; Normal PWV
Numbers at the tops of bars represent the overall percentage distribution of all subtypes of untreated hypertension
in that age group.
IDH (SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP ≥90 mm Hg) – Pharmacologics available
SDH (SBP ≥140 mm Hg and DBP ≥90 mm Hg) – IDH drugs + Lifestyle modifications
ISH (SBP ≥140 mm Hg and DBP <90 mm Hg) – NO PHARMACOLOGICAL AGENTS!
Franklin et al. Hypertension. 2001 Mar;37(3):869-74
11. PWV and Aging in Rodents
Mice Rats
Steppan et al, AJP Heart and Circ Physiol., 2019
Steppan et al, JAHA, 2014
12. PWV is a valuable predictor of cardiovascular risk
Ben Shlomo et al (2014); JACC 63:636-636
17,635
subjects
• aPWV predicts future cardiovascular events and mortality, even after accounting for
other established cardiovascular risk factors.
• Predictor of coronary heart disease and stroke after adjusting for traditional risk
factors
• Predictive value is stronger in younger versus older subjects – improved
classification particularly for younger individuals at intermediate risk
• Predictive value was not modified by hypertension, smoking, sex, diabetes, or
kidney disease.
• Improved the overall 10-year classification by 13%.
Lifestyle
Vs.
GeneticsAge
Diabetes
Hypertension
Obesity
Co-morbidities
Exercise
Diet
Stress
13. Endothelial Cells (EC)
Smooth Muscle Cells (VSMC)
Nitric Oxide (NO)
Blood pressure (cGMP)
Protein function (S-nitrosylation)
Protein secretion (“secretome”)
Gene expression
↑ Matrix Stiffness (↑collagen, ↑ elastin
fragmentation, ↑remodeling)
↑ Cell stiffness
Molecular Events
Structural Changes
↑ Vascular Stiffness
↑ VSMC motility, proliferation,
de-differentiation
Cell behavior
Vascular Function
Molecular/ Cellular Hallmarks of Vascular Stiffening
Aging
Endothelial dysfunction:
↓ NO Bioavailability
↓ Barrier function
Aberrant Cell-matrix
interaction/mechano-transduction
15. Tissue transglutaminase (TG2): A Matrix
Remodeling Enzyme
“Open”
“Closed”
GTP
Ca2+
https://pdb101.rcsb.org/motm/209
b-sandwich Catalytic core Barrel 1 Barrel 2 Full length TG2(4 domains)
Transamidation Reaction = Classical
Transglutaminase Function
• Member of transglutaminase family
• 1 of 8 catalytically active members
• >80% TG2 is cytosolic
• <20% at cell membrane/ ECM
• Secretion occurs via Golgi-independent pathway
• Activated in wound healing, fibrosis
Lysine Glutamine
Isopeptide
bond
16. Bakker et al, Circ Res, 2006
Eftekhari et al, J Vasc Res, 2007
Tissue Transglutaminase (TG2)
Background
So…Does TG2 play a role in
regulating stiffness in the
aorta?
TG2 mediates resistance
vessel remodeling
Low flow induced remodeling PE induced vasoconstriction
Purified TG2
+ CysNO
Lai TS et al, Biochemistry
40(16),
4904-4910 (2001)
17. TG2 secretion is NO dependent
= TG2 Red = Intracellular
Green = Extracellular
NO?
GSNO = NO donor
Cyst = TG inhibitor
L-NAME = eNOS inhibitor
DTT = reducing agent
Santhanam et al, Circ Res, 2010
18. Endothelial NO regulates TG2 secretion and activity
Santhanam et al, Circ Res, 2009
Santhanam et al, Chem Biol, 2011
Jandu et al, Amino Acids, 2011
Co-culture approach
HAEC = endothelial cells
HASMC = smooth muscle cells
L-NAME = NOS inhibitor
HAEC = human aortic endothelial cells
HASMC = human aortic SMC
IMR-90 = human Fibroblast
19. Hypothesis
Increased Central Vascular Stiffness
TG2
NO
SNO
Inhibits cross-linking function
eNOS
Hypothesis
ROSNO
eNOS
H2O2
O2-.
AGINGDecreased NO bioavailability
Increased ROS
Disrupt cell signaling
Impair vascular function
NOX enzymes
Mitochondrial enzymes
20. TG2-SNO decreases and transamidation activity increases with age
Decellularize
Homogenize tissue scaffold
Determine Matrix TG2 by
Western Blotting
= TG2
= VSMC
= EC
L-NAME
BASE
E-
YOUNG
OLD
O1 O2 Y1 Y2
Santhanam et al; Circ Res 2009
Jandu et al, Amino Acids, 2011
Cystamine - + - +
Young Old
BPA
Total TG2
RAT HUMAN
33-49 Years 62-101 Years
TG activity increases with age
in human aorta
21. TG2 is the primary vascular TGase
WT TG2-/-± L-NAME
20 mg/kg/day
4 weeks
Santhanam et al, Circ Res, 2010
-L682.777 + L682.777
80% TGase activity in the aorta is
TG2 derived
(Green = TG2 activity; blue = nucleus)
WT aorta becomes stiffer; but TG2 KO mice are
protected in L-NAME induced endothelial dysfunction.
L-NAME = NOS inhibitor
Doppler PWV Pressure
myography
L-NAME = eNOS inhibitor
Compliance = inverse of stiffness
22. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0
1000
2000
3000
Strain
Stress,mN/mm2
TG2-/-
WT
**
A) B)
TG2-/- mice: In vivo and ex vivo stiffness
TG2
GAPDH
WT
TG2-/-
Young mice
(Decellularized matrix)
Tensile testing
Decellularize
Steppan et al, JAHA; 2017 Feb 3;6(2):e004161.
Armstrong et al Acta Cir Bras. 2018 Nov;33(11):991-999.
C)
23. TG2-/- mouse aorta is more compliant in vitro but
not in vivo
D) E)
50 70 90 110 130 150
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
MAP (mmHg)
PWV,m/s
WT
TG2-/-
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Strain
Stress,mN/mm2
TG2-/-
WT
**
Intact vessels
VSMCs compensate for more compliant matrix to maintain baseline physiological stiffness
Steppan et al, JAHA; 2017 Feb 3;6(2):e004161.
24. b-sandwich Catalytic core Barrel 1 Barrel 2 Full length TG2 (4 domains)
What is the mechanism?
CYTOSOL
EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX
(Protein crosslinking – classic
TGase reaction)
CELL SURFACE
(Cell adhesion – Fibronectin,
Integrin, syndecan, binding)
INTRACELLULAR/ CELL
MEMBRANE (INNER)
(GTPase/ GTP binding)
= GTP
= Ca2+
1. Gundemir, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2012: 1823(2):406-19
2. Mehta K. Transglutaminases. 2015:215-228.
3. Kang et al, Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002 Apr
26;293(1):383-90
Ca2+
GTP
Closed
conformation
Open
conformation
TG2: A molecular “Swiss-army
knife”
• GTPase PLC VSMC tone
• TG2-adhesive function
Strength/number of focal
adhesions
• Traction force
• VSMC stiffness
4. Feng et al, Biochemistry. 1999 Feb 16;38(7):2224-32
5. Belkin and co-workers – TG2-integrin/Fn interaction
6. Griffin and co-workers – TG2- syndecan interaction
25. IP: Integrin β1
WB: TG2
WB: Integrin β1
WT
eNOSKO
WT eNOS KO
0
100
200
300
400
TG2/Integrin
(NormalizedtoWT)
*
(n = 5)
IgGcontrol
Jung et al, AJP Heart, 2013
Steppan et al, JAHA, 2017
What is the Mechanism?
Magnetic twisting cytometry
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 ∝
1
𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
1. Tighter TG2 mediated
cell adhesion
2. Cell Stiffness
WT TG2-/-
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
CellStiffness(Pa/nm)
P=0.0019
26. Exogenous TG2 recovers passive stiffnessand
vasoreactivity in TG2-/- mice independent of crosslinking
function
L682.777 = Specific TG2 inhibitor
gpTG2 = purified guinea pig liver transglutaminase
rTG2 = recombinant TG2
27. TGM2-C277S mouse: A novel knock-in
mouse
sgRNA
Cas9 nickase
HDR Oligo
Fertilized
oocytes
Surrogate
mother
Screen to ID
F0 (Founders)
sgRNA Target C277 active site cysteine
HDR Oligo sequence bearing desired mutation
Santhanam Lab, unpublished results
30. Matrix remodeling and VSMCs are both
shareholders in vascular stiffening
• Aortic stiffness increases with age in WT mice
• TG2-/- mice are protected from aging associated stiffening
• TGM2-C277S mice Stiffer than TG2-/-, but marked protection vs. WT
A) B)
ECMTG2
Total TG2
GAPDH
Y O Y O
WT TGM2-C277S
3-6mo
>15mo
3-6mo
>15mo
3-6mo
>15mo
0
2
4
6
8
PWV(m/s)
WT
C277S
****
TG2-/-
****
****
**
**
Santhanam Lab, unpublished results
31. Matrix and VSMC both contribute to passive
stiffness
****
****
****
****
Santhanam Lab, unpublished results
32. Targeting TG2 crosslinking function interrupts
vascular stiffening but does not reverse it
± Cystamine (TG inhibitor)
40 mg/kg/day
3 months
Santhanam et al, Circ Res., 2010
Cystamine = TG inhibitor (non-specific)
34. Conclusions
• TG2 is an important target in aging-associated vascular
stiffening
• TG2 is regulated in the vasculature by an NO-dependent
mechanism
• The novel TGM2-C277S knock-in mouse shows matrix and
VSMC are both important shareholders in vascular stiffening
• VSMC-Matrix interaction/biomechanical input from the matrix
is an important determinant of VSMC tone/stiffness in vivo
• Targeting individual functions of TG2 can yield distinct changes
to overall stiffness by altering the VSMC stiffness and/or
VSMC-ECM crosstalk
• This model can be used to determine the specific role of TG2’s
crosslinking function in other diseases.
35. Acknowledgements
Dr. Dan Berkowitz
Dr. Daniel Nyhan
Dr. Steven An
Dr. Marc Halushka
Dr. Alberto Avolio
Dr. Alexey Belkin
Dr. Mark Butlin
Dr. Jochen Steppan
Dr. Sungmee Jung
Dr. Dinani Armstrong
Dr. Young Jun Oh
Funding:
NIH R01-HL105296
AHA BGIA2220181
ACCM StAAR awards
Dr. Simran Jandu
Dr. Alanah Webb
James Chen
Sean Melucci
Ivy Wang
Sandeep Jandu
Kavitha Nandakumar
Mentors/collaborators
Postdoctoral
Mentees/Fellows
Pre-doc Mentees/
Technicians
36. To ask a question, click the Q&A Button,
type your question and click send. Any
questions that are not addressed during
the live webinar will be answered
following the event.
Please indicate whom you want to
address your question.
Thank you for participating!
Q&A
SESSION:
Lakshmi Santhanam, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Anesthesiology and Critical
Care Medicine