Eurovision: Postmodernism
Eurovision Song Contest
• Created in war-torn Europe by European
Broadcasting Union (EBU) to bring countries
together
• Longest-running annual international TV song
competition
• One of the longest running TV shows in the world
• Began in 1956
• Broadcasts every year
• Audience viewing figures between 100-600
million internationally
Eurovision Song Contest
• 42 countries select and perform an original
song
• All countries have select ‘jurys’ of musical
professionals who rank songs and award 1-12
points in a scoring system
• Countries with the most points win…
• OR DO THEY???
• New voting system this year where jury scores
were added to audience votes 50/50
Eurovision Song Contest
• Long been considered ‘a joke’ competition
• Diverse supranational audience with contrasting tastes –
much of the music is geared towards ‘mass’ appeal and can
sound the same
• Voting is almost always considered corrupt (ethnic blocs
vote for each other)
• Supposed to be non-political BUT
– Judges and televoters voting based on national relationships to
other countries
– Booing of countries based on conflicts / positions on certain
policies
– Terry Wogan stepped down as presenter saying he felt the
voting was no longer fair or based on the song only
• Running orders are decided by producers and not through
randow draws – some allegations of giving highly ranked
artists bad running positions
Eurovision Song Contest
• General audiences and participants still believe in the
‘truth’ of the contest
• Viewers enjoy the ESC for its self-aware campness
• Terry Wogan / Graham Norton presenters in the UK –
commentaries:
– ‘See if you can watch this without being distracted by the
two idiots in the raincoats’ (on the Icelandic entry in 1999)
– ‘Who knows what hellish future lies ahead? Actually I do
because I’ve seen the rehearsals.’ (introducing the 2007
contest in Helsinki)
– ‘I love the Eurovision Song Contest and it will continue long
after I’m gone. Just please don’t ask me to take it
seriously.’ (in 2008)
Eurovision Song Contest –
spectacle
• Involves an aesthetic dimension
• Dramatic
• Bound up with competition
• Highly public social event
• Increasingly commercialised
• Vulgar and glitzy
• Arena of political contestation
Eurovision Song Contest
https://youtu.be/aMgW54HBOS0
• Parody – mimicking – affectionate fun
• Self-parody – point that originality is lost
• Pastiche – imitation of another’s style
• Homage – reference to influences
• Intertextuality – audience foreknowledge
Create a case study
• Create a case study of:
– a musical event
– an album / single
– a specific artist
• Identify and explain postmodern elements

L3 pomo eurovision

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Eurovision Song Contest •Created in war-torn Europe by European Broadcasting Union (EBU) to bring countries together • Longest-running annual international TV song competition • One of the longest running TV shows in the world • Began in 1956 • Broadcasts every year • Audience viewing figures between 100-600 million internationally
  • 3.
    Eurovision Song Contest •42 countries select and perform an original song • All countries have select ‘jurys’ of musical professionals who rank songs and award 1-12 points in a scoring system • Countries with the most points win… • OR DO THEY??? • New voting system this year where jury scores were added to audience votes 50/50
  • 4.
    Eurovision Song Contest •Long been considered ‘a joke’ competition • Diverse supranational audience with contrasting tastes – much of the music is geared towards ‘mass’ appeal and can sound the same • Voting is almost always considered corrupt (ethnic blocs vote for each other) • Supposed to be non-political BUT – Judges and televoters voting based on national relationships to other countries – Booing of countries based on conflicts / positions on certain policies – Terry Wogan stepped down as presenter saying he felt the voting was no longer fair or based on the song only • Running orders are decided by producers and not through randow draws – some allegations of giving highly ranked artists bad running positions
  • 5.
    Eurovision Song Contest •General audiences and participants still believe in the ‘truth’ of the contest • Viewers enjoy the ESC for its self-aware campness • Terry Wogan / Graham Norton presenters in the UK – commentaries: – ‘See if you can watch this without being distracted by the two idiots in the raincoats’ (on the Icelandic entry in 1999) – ‘Who knows what hellish future lies ahead? Actually I do because I’ve seen the rehearsals.’ (introducing the 2007 contest in Helsinki) – ‘I love the Eurovision Song Contest and it will continue long after I’m gone. Just please don’t ask me to take it seriously.’ (in 2008)
  • 6.
    Eurovision Song Contest– spectacle • Involves an aesthetic dimension • Dramatic • Bound up with competition • Highly public social event • Increasingly commercialised • Vulgar and glitzy • Arena of political contestation
  • 7.
    Eurovision Song Contest https://youtu.be/aMgW54HBOS0 •Parody – mimicking – affectionate fun • Self-parody – point that originality is lost • Pastiche – imitation of another’s style • Homage – reference to influences • Intertextuality – audience foreknowledge
  • 8.
    Create a casestudy • Create a case study of: – a musical event – an album / single – a specific artist • Identify and explain postmodern elements