The Stroop Effect Effect 18 Title Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Date Abstract The Stroop effect is a phenomenon in cognitive psychology with numerous applications. This phenomenon occurs when an individual is given a task of identifying the color of a word rather the word itself. The concept behind this experiment is simplified although the reaction time when there is a mismatch in the color and word represents an integral study in cognitive psychology. The basic operation of the Stroop effect is to relatively measure the concentration and power of the mind. It would be easier for an individual to name the color of a word in a similar color. This means that a normal mind finds it simpler to name a color with matching sematic meaning in wording. Generally, Stroop effect measures the correlation between interference and reaction time. The first development of the Stroop effect was demonstrated in 1935 by an American psychologist named John Ridley Stroop. From his original experiment, different psychological hypothesis have been drawn. Topping to this is the development of numerous articles explaining, experimenting or expounding on this effect. The articles have been strongly based on Stroop’s original effect although different researchers have replicated his effect. The initial experiment has been discussed in many psychological classes. Researchers in the field of experimental psychology have cited the original paper in their various studies. The application of Stroop effect in clinical practice has aided in finding treatment for patients with psychological disorders. The Stroop effect is also imperative in investigations since it acts as a feasible psychological test. Experimental findings from different tests reveal stimuli reaction due to sematic interference and sematic facilitation. Stroop conceptual framework secludes three stimuli groups (incongruent, neutral and congruent).The stimuli are used during all experiments to draw conclusions. The Stroop effect is processes within two parts of the brain; the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex. Results from reaction to stimuli in the two brain parts are explained using a number of theories namely; selective attention, processing speed, parallel distributed processing and automacity. The Stroop effect has been a milestone in collating cognitive development with other variables viz. working memory and processing speed. Researchers have published modified Stroop tests in bilingualism. In this field, wrapped words, reverse tests and spatial tests have all been applied. Introduction Macleod empties Stroop effect as one of the most popular study in cognitive science and psychology. In its basic application, the test entails ignoring a printed word then naming the color of the word. Basically naming the color printed in a word such as BLUE is surrounded by many cognitive properties. Automacity was introduced in 1886 since it is easier to read word as c.

1. The Stroop Effect Effect 18
Title
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
Abstract
The Stroop effect is a phenomenon in cognitive psychology with
numerous applications. This phenomenon occurs when an
individual is given a task of identifying the color of a word
rather the word itself. The concept behind this experiment is
simplified although the reaction time when there is a mismatch
in the color and word represents an integral study in cognitive
psychology. The basic operation of the Stroop effect is to
relatively measure the concentration and power of the mind. It
would be easier for an individual to name the color of a word in
a similar color. This means that a normal mind finds it simpler
to name a color with matching sematic meaning in wording.
Generally, Stroop effect measures the correlation between
interference and reaction time. The first development of the
Stroop effect was demonstrated in 1935 by an American
psychologist named John Ridley Stroop. From his original
experiment, different psychological hypothesis have been
drawn. Topping to this is the development of numerous articles
explaining, experimenting or expounding on this effect. The
articles have been strongly based on Stroop’s original effect
although different researchers have replicated his effect.

2. The initial experiment has been discussed in many
psychological classes. Researchers in the field of experimental
psychology have cited the original paper in their various
studies. The application of Stroop effect in clinical practice has
aided in finding treatment for patients with psychological
disorders. The Stroop effect is also imperative in investigations
since it acts as a feasible psychological test. Experimental
findings from different tests reveal stimuli reaction due to
sematic interference and sematic facilitation. Stroop conceptual
framework secludes three stimuli groups (incongruent, neutral
and congruent).The stimuli are used during all experiments to
draw conclusions. The Stroop effect is processes within two
parts of the brain; the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the
anterior cingulate cortex. Results from reaction to stimuli in the
two brain parts are explained using a number of theories
namely; selective attention, processing speed, parallel
distributed processing and automacity. The Stroop effect has
been a milestone in collating cognitive development with other
variables viz. working memory and processing speed.
Researchers have published modified Stroop tests in
bilingualism. In this field, wrapped words, reverse tests and
spatial tests have all been applied.
Introduction
Macleod empties Stroop effect as one of the most popular study
in cognitive science and psychology. In its basic application,
the test entails ignoring a printed word then naming the color of
the word. Basically naming the color printed in a word such as
BLUE is surrounded by many cognitive properties. Automacity
was introduced in 1886 since it is easier to read word as
compared to other properties within a subject. Automacity is an
uncontrolled and fast reaction of the brain. For this reason, it is
well established that interference will occur as a human being is
subjected to incompatible words. Stroop experiment suggests
that processes which ideally faster affect slower processes while
the reverse is false. Interference is demonstrated using both
congruent and incongruent conditions. Words with more

3. relevance show a higher tendency of interference. The Stroop
effect has been manipulated by most researchers in a manner
which fits into their research. The speed of processing
importance is dismissed by Glaser studies where color was sped
up. Stroop effect is alternatively explained using two paradigms
namely dimensional imbalance and uncertainty. The two
explanations connect the correlation between stimulus and the
recovery time due to an interference. The Stroop effect is
applied today to explain the function of different human brain
parts (MacLeod, The Stroop Efffect, 2015).
Acquisition of knowledge and skills requires extensive research
and experiments. Majority of nurses join their practice fresh
from other backgrounds.it is important to train these individuals
on the correct and accepted practice. The research carried out
ensures that all medical practitioner especially nurses practice
the accepted measures towards competency and provision of
healthcare. The Salford Research community model puts into
place the required parameters via which a nurse can be referred
to as competent. This will ensure that nurses and researchers do
not loose patients (Hardicre, 2013).
Logical research in poorer countries is relied upon to center
around connected issues. Encompassed by poor prospects and
framework, foundations in these nations bolster quick creating
examination that can give guide results to the economy. Much
outside speculation goes a similar way. For creating nations to
deal with unadulterated science is regularly seen from outside
as liberal and inefficient. Witness the contention that occurred
in the United Kingdom a year ago over India - a beneficiary of
British guide - building up its own space program. Connected
research positively has its place, in creating and in addition
created nations. Science as an apparatus to profit and secure a
sustenance supply is vital to survival. It can target nearby
issues: a remarkable achievement is the procedure created by
Brazil to turn (locally bounteous) sugar stick into ethanol as a
biofuel asset. In Southeast Asia, the art of cassava bugs and
ailments is a need, since a large number of individuals here

4. depend on cassava as a staple sustenance and a wellspring of
pay. Yet, we ought not to overlook that there is a whole other
world to life than amassing assets. Numerous different variables
undermine human presence - from changing infections to
moving structural plates. In the Southern Hemisphere, where
most creating nations (Rochmyaningsih, 2016).
Utilizing the oral and manual Stroop assignments the case that
recovery of importance from a composed word is programmed,
as in it can't be controlled. The semantic obstruction impact
(more prominent impedance caused by shading related words
than shading unbiased words) was utilized as the file of
semantic enactment. To control the dimension of attentional
power over the assignment of perusing, the extent of no
readable, impartial preliminaries (a column of #s) was differed.
In every one of the four analyses a high-impartial extent
amplified the impedance caused by word distractors. With the
shading related words displayed in incongruent shading (e.g.,
LEMON in blue), the semantic Stroop impact was powerless and
did not connect with nonpartisan extent (Experiment 1 and 2).
Examination 3 and 4 utilized shading names (e.g., GREEN) not
in the reaction set, and here the semantic impedance impact was
more vigorous, and the impact was amplified in the high-
unbiased extent condition. We take these outcomes to contend
that semantic recovery is controlled by endogenous
consideration in the Stroop undertaking (Kinoshita, Mills, Luke,
& Graham, 2018)
. Execution and mind action were estimated amid two hours of
constant Stroop assignment execution. Mental weakness, known
to impact top-down preparing, was utilized to explain separate
impacts through best down and base up components. Here we
affirm that execution in the Stroop undertaking is surely
emphatically regulated by upgrade history. Execution was
influenced by the sort of development data accessible; reliant on
this data modifications were made, bringing about differential
impacts of subjective clash, and S-R official on resulting
execution. The impact of mental exhaustion on data handling

5. was principally identified with general consequences for
consideration (Lorist & Jolij, 2012).
The original test by Ridley Stroop published in 1935 draws its
hypothesis from previous research by Munsterberg and Muller.
The two researchers found the connection between automatic
functioning of the brain with reference to daily operation. From
this studies, Stroop developed a test to determine the effects of
interference on cognitive prowess. The tests involved
arrangement of different words with congruence and
incongruence to their colors. The subjects were then required to
identify the color of the words rather than the word themselves.
All participants were allowed to sit close to the window while
Stroop performed the tests. Results from the experiment show
that interference originates from materials and words used. Use
of conflicting color proves this hypothesis and shows the
stimuli in reading incongruent words. The results showed
consistence in both males and females while female participants
were more favored to read colors more. Conclusively, the
experiment conducted by Stroop showed that there is a tendency
of the brain to act involuntarily when subject to incongruent and
interference of conflicting words (Stroop, 1935).
Stroop effect and its analog have been created taxonomically.
The effect has been widely published in documents. It is
paramount to look into the myths surrounding this effect and
dismiss weak theories. The serial-color test is Stroop’s standard
test. The difference in time depicts interference. Dvoracek
insists that more experiments should be carried out to lower
chances of misinterpreting the normal measure of interference.
Application of an individual stimulus type of the color word test
is most preferred to offer distinctive results. This test shows
that interference is independent. A proposed version of the
Stroop test is to ask participants to sort stimuli into categories
rather than having to read them aloud. This can be made more
feasible by applying pictures in place of words. The pictures
allow greater manipulation thus giving a better time analysis.
Suggestions have also been given to identify the auditory

6. analysis of the strop task. Hamers illustrates an auditory
procedure used by recognizing pitch buildup with time. The
responses were given either verbally or by using a button press.
The auditory tasks have been argued to relate to the Stroop
effect. Other Analogs suggest application of polygons or
symmetrical shapes with alternating colors. Manipulation of
data is done to determine hue, acoustic or sematic variation.
Irrespective of the existing manipulated test, the role of Stroop
effect is primarily to test interference with cognitive. The best
theories to explain this effect are the Automacity and relative
speed theory (MacLeod, Half a Century of Research on the
Stroop Effect:An Integrative Review, 1991).
There is an absolute need to carry out an extensive review of
traditional standpoints of Automacity. Canvassers have recently
curried out experiments to relate automatic cognitive processes
with continuity. The empirical data collected from these studies
prove that all cognitive automatic processes happen
continuously and they are therefore affected by attentional
control. An Attention model is developed and presented to show
processing framework. The proposed model show that
Automaticity is a factor of the processing speed. The properties
of automaticity increase with an increase in strength.
Consequently, strength is subject to training. While
exemplifying the Stroop effect, automaticity is confirmed to
happen gradually and continuously. A model is well computed
to reveal how automatic processes are improves by training.
This computational model is achieved by adding together
McClelland’s cascade mechanism and Rumelhart’s back
propagation algorithm of learning. The model is important in
expounding inference, Automaticity and attention as applied in
the Stroop effect (Cohen, Dunbar, & McClelland, 1990)
The Stroop effect elaborates the extent to which it is easier to
name a color with a compatible word as compared to an
incompatible color word. The latter is prone to slowness and
errors. It is much easier to name the color of a control item due
to lack of interference in the mind. The interference occurrence

7. has provided an integral foundation for which theories
originate. The Stroop effect is significant in understanding
cognitive and neural study in reference to selective attention. A
behavioral phenomenon sketch is provided to highlight
Automacity in two dimensions. There is a possibility that
Automaticity is correlated to the extent through which an inter-
dimensional interference takes place. Additionally automaticity
of the two dimensions has an effect of the direction between the
two variables. The paper also shows how Automacity is
explained in the presented models. When analyzing Stroop
effect it is imperative to consider both the negative priming and
the emotional Stroop task. The anterior cingulate in the brain is
responsible for processing competition or conflict events. This
is confirmed through a series of Stroop tests which is presented
in form of brain images and scans (MacLeod & MacDonald,
Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering
the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention, 2000).
Stroop processes have a definitive role in creating different
emotions. A series of experiments and tests are carried out to
determine the extent to which Stroop effect impacts on emotions
exhibited by a character. The tests involve primarily tests
conducted in the original Stroop test viz. color naming and
lexical decision making. Findings from the tests show the
existing disconnect between Stroop effect and emotional Stroop
task. Tests revealed that actual word reading, lexical decisions
and the naming of colors is extensively slower when words with
emotional effect are used. The difference in time is not subject
to relevance of the task or relative change in color or salience
of the words. The difference in time was discovered to be
absent when a block of emotional and average words were used.
For this reason, the implication is directed towards a threat
powered generic slowdown rather than classic effect Stroop
effect characterized by selective attention (lgom, Chajut, & Lev,
2004).
Working memory affects behavior similar to an external
perception and attended stimulus. The working memory is an

8. internal stimuli which can direct attention. Tests were carried
out to determine whether placing a color in working memory
instead of an exterior environment can cause effects of
interference in a task. The test is an application of the Stroop
effect since it involves creation of interference via color
discrimination. The working memory test shows important
resemblance to the initial Stroop effect. The similarity in both
congruent and incongruent stimulus show the relationship
between working memory and selective attention. The findings
further shows a consistence in poor memory results when
subjects to incongruent stimuli. Finally, the research empties
that attention and working memory apply similar operational
resources and are therefore correlated (Kiyonaga & obias Egner,
2014).
Understanding emotions in human beings require use of both
linguistic and nonlinguistic information. The combination of the
two sets of information builds up recognition of emotions.
Interaction of emotion communication is identified in this
research by taking up the Stroop task of emotion identification.
There was an interchange of the prosody of the spoken words
“sad” and “happy”. The two sets of emotions were used
interchangeably using an array of words incongruent to the
meaning. The results shown inaccuracy in incongruent tasks
while congruent tasks revealed consistence and high accuracy.
Sematic rhythm in words with verbal content influences the
processing of emotional words. The application of this test is
present in language evolution studies together with multimodal
communication (Bowling, Heege, Newen, & Ocklenburg, 2016).
Bilingualism also referred to as cognitive inhibition has effects
on the functioning of the human brain. This phenomenon is
tested using the Stroop color word task. The idea behind this
experiment is based on the assumption that long exposure of
bilingual individuals to a secondary language affects their
efficiency in cognitive control mechanisms. The strop effect
was conducted on a number of French-German natives using
respective languages. The tests were also conducted on

9. monolingual individuals so as to provide room for comparison.
Findings from the Stroop task confirmed that bilingualism
reinforces the third language while being regulated by the
second language. Immersion begins with top to down inhibitory.
Conclusively, top-down active inhibitory control is responsible
for controlling language therefore the Stroop effect is well
supported (Moutier, Hemforth, & Heidlmayr, 2013).
Association of congruency to the masked Stroop test reveals the
classic context specific proportion of congruency
(CSPCE).consciousness is traditionally associated with
cognitive neuroscience together with psychological fields. It is
apparent that cognitive control could be primarily unconscious
and involuntary. CSPCE is tested against the effects of
adaptation to conflict. The Stroop’s effect is effectively applied
to determine cognitive control using electrophysiological
parameters. There is correlation between neurons and CSPCE
which confirms unconscious states of the mind. All the results
from this experiment confirm the actual existence of an
unconscious context-specific proportion congruency effect
(CSPCE) (Panadero, Castellanos, & Tudela, 2015).
Event-related potential (ERP) approach is applied in tracking
the duration of distraction while a participant is undertaking the
Stroop task. The participants perform color naming tasks with
both congruent and incongruent word meaning. An alternation
of high-frequency and low-frequency words is used. Results
show that the distractor frequency has effects on the performed
color-naming task. The interpretation of data shows that the
distractor words together with the effect of latency suppress
cognitive ability (Navarrete, Sessa, Peressotti, & Dell'Acqua,
2015).
For over 80 years, scientists have inspected the impedance
between programmed handling of stimuli, for example, the
significance of color words, on execution of a
controlled‐processing undertaking, for example, naming the
color in which words are printed. The Stroop effect and its
numerous varieties give a perfect test stage to looking at the

10. opposition between upgrade control and subjective control of
consideration, as reflected in conduct. The two analyses
revealed here demonstrate that rhesus monkeys, similar to
human grown-ups, indicate obstruction from garbled
improvement conditions in a number‐Stroop assignment, and
that the monkeys might be especially powerless to impact from
reaction quality and less capable, in respect to human grown-
ups, of utilizing official consideration regarding limit this
impedance (Washburn, 2016).
This paper gives a hypothetical analysis of the application of
Stroop effect in modern advertisement and presentations. The
paper relies on information discussed above so as to determine
the implication of Stroop’s effect on customers who supposedly
view adverts of unknown products. The paper also discusses
predicted results based on different tests theoretically carried
out with reference to the original Stroop test.
Research question
What are the effects of application of Stroop effect in business
specifically marketing and advertisement?
Independent and dependent variables
The independent variable in this experiment is the Stroop effect
while the dependent variable is marketing, advertisement and
the business.
Proposed methodology
Participants
The research would be ideally carried out in a closed forum
with 100 participants drawn from different locations. The
primary idea of this distinction is to ensure that all participants
have no prior information on the content being presented. The
product displayed in adverts should be new such that no
participant has prior information about it. The participants will
be chosen using cluster sampling method to ensure that data
collected is valid and reliable. The individuals will be divided
into clusters where each cluster will be grouped using a single
random sampling method. Each member will only belong to a
single cluster to avoid duplication of results. The chosen cluster

11. will be sampled to provide necessary findings.
Materials and Procedure
Data will be collected after participants are subjected to
different adverts. The adverts will display both incongruence
and congruence in the word meaning in relation to the word
color. Further, an extrapolation of the Stroop effect will be
carried out by selecting words that are powerful and simple
against long words. The tests will be given on an alternating
base to ensure that all human factors such as fatigue have less
effects on the results. The simpler advertisement will have
meaningful words such as revolutionary, easy to use, simply the
best among others. Additionally, the words will correlate with
colors used to ensure uniformity and reduce ambiguity. Words
will be displayed on screens in form of presentations containing
information on two similar products. After the adverts, the
participants will be required to select between the two products
presented earlier. Data will be analyzed depending on the
number of selected products together with reasons why
individual participant chose the product.
Predicted results and discussion
One strategy for advertising that utilizes the Stroop Effect may
be the connection of an immediate and intense word like
"revolutionary" to what, as a general rule, is a genuinely minor
change in an item. The fact of the matter is to misrepresent the
change - for instance, another state of a vehicle's rigging shifter
- and concentrate the watcher's consideration on "progressive."
If the word could easily compare to its unique circumstance, at
that point the word can, in a manner of speaking, cover over the
truth of what is being depicted. The word, in this way, turns out
to be huger than the truth being depicted. It will be noted that
the advert with much simpler and meaningful wordswill be
selected more times.
Stroop's examinations proposed that the human cerebrum isn't
generally accountable for its own reactions to boosts. People are
"automatic pursuers" and see words before whatever else,
demonstrating the overwhelming impact of words on human

12. discernment. Words can be powerful to the point that they can
mean more than that which they portray. Words in themselves
are discrete parcels of data that pass on scholarly affiliations.
As individuals are mingled, certain affiliations get beat into
their brains with the end goal that the word summons an adapted
physical and additionally enthusiastic reaction. The Stroop
Effect, which may appear to be minor in itself, is for the
promoting scene, an eye opener. It infers that the mind, in any
event affected by its instructive molding, is wired to react to
words on a page more fundamentally than to some other factor
about an item. An idea that is wealthy in affiliations is more
critical to the normal individual than its more extensive setting.
Promoters need to utilize words or expressions that intensely
and basically summon a rich exhibit of mental and enthusiastic
affiliations.
Control of internal validity
The experiment would be faced by some threats of validity.
These threats would ideally lower the correlation between the
existing variables. The expected threats include selection bias,
repeated testing, differential attrition, spurious relations within
participants resulting into manipulated results and history of
dependent variables. This threats will be controlled by using
random sampling to select the clusters within which the
experiments will be carried. Additionally, the cluster to be
selected will be selected via the same method. To control
repeated testing, only one cluster will be tested. The history of
Stroop effect will be controlled by ensuring that the researcher
carries out an intensive research on the individuals in relation to
the past effects. The research will also work an equivalent
sample of individuals to minimize threats of internal validity.
Conclusion
To see and collaborate with the world, we first need to
comprehend it. Visual preparing is one way we do this, and is
made out of numerous parts. When we see a protest, we don't
simply observe its physical traits, we likewise fathom the
importance behind them. We realize that a seat needs legs in

13. light of the fact that the seat should be raised, we realize that
the wood originates from trees, we realize we could sit in it, et
cetera. There is data that we procedure about the things we see
without monitoring that processing. Stroop's advancement was
to appear, obviously and completely, that our installed
information about our condition impacts how we communicate
with it. His examination strategy is currently a standout
amongst the most renowned and understood models of a mental
test, and is exquisite in its straightforwardness. This
information can consequently be applied in both marketing and
advertisement. The results will ensure that the business receives
more customers while reinforcing the loyalty of existing
customers.
References
Bowling, L., Heege, L., Newen, A., & Ocklenburg, S. (2016).
More than words (and faces): evidence for a Stroop effect of
prosody in emotion word processing. Cognition and Emotion,
879-891.
Cohen, J., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. (1990). On the control
of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing
account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 332-361.
Hardicre, J. (2013). Developing research nurses: a structured
taxonomic model. British Journal of Nursing, 416-418.
Kinoshita, S., Mills, L., Luke, N., & Graham, D. (2018). The
semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and
Cognition, 1730-1742.
Kiyonaga, A., & obias Egner. (2014). The Working Memory
Stroop Effect: When Internal Representations Clash With
External Stimuli. Psychological Science, 61-67.
lgom, D., Chajut, E., & Lev, S. (2004). A Rational Look at the
Emotional Stroop Phenomenon: A Generic Slowdown, Not a
Stroop Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 323-338.
Lorist, M., & Jolij, J. (2012). Trial History Effects in Stroop

14. Task Performance Are Independent of Top-Down Control. PloS
ONE, 39802.
MacLeod, M. (1991). Half a Century of Research on the Stroop
Effect:An Integrative Review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2),
163-203.
MacLeod, M. (2015). The Stroop Efffect. Encyclopedia of Color
Science and Technology, 1-6.
MacLeod, M., & MacDonald, A. (2000). Interdimensional
interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and
neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 407-
409.
Moutier, S., Hemforth, B., & Heidlmayr, K. (2013). Successive
bilingualism and executive functions: The effect of second
language use on inhibitory control in a behavioural Stroop
Colour Word task*. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 31-
39.
Navarrete, E., Sessa, P., Peressotti, F., & Dell'Acqua, R. (2015).
The distractor frequency effect in the colour-naming Stroop
task: An overt naming event-related potential study. Journal of
Cognitive Psychology, 277-289.
Panadero, A., Castellanos, M., & Tudela, P. (2015).
Unconscious context-specific proportion congruency effect in a
stroop-like task. Consciousness and Cognition, 35-45.
Rochmyaningsih, D. (2016). The developing world needs basic
research too. Nature, 50-62.
Stroop, R. (1935). STUDIES OF INTERFERENCE IN SERIAL
VERBAL REACTIONS. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
643-662.
Washburn, D. (2016). The Stroop effect at 80: The competition
between stimulus control and cognitive control. Journal of the
Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 194-205.