RFID tagging of cartons at Direct Fulfillment sites could automate shipping and receiving processes, improve inventory audits, and reduce shipping errors. This would increase partner productivity and reduce costs for partners and Cisco. The document outlines a phased pilot program to implement RFID tagging at select DF and SLC sites, estimates initial costs of $4 million, and identifies risks around ensuring partner cost reductions are passed to Cisco. Resources are requested to refine estimates and create an implementation plan.
One question Jeff asks is, if RFID is so great, why aren’t our partners investing already?
Equipment and implementation costs were high, but are declining
Technology has improved in the last 4-5 years as has performance and reliability
There wasn’t a standard used across vendors, but now we have the EPC Gen 2 global standard
Jabil, Flex and Foxconn have participated in pilots and POCs with Cisco. Flex and Foxconn are working on their own internal funded projects.
Our solution provider, Tagit Solutions, has developed similar systems for HP, Verizon, Huawei, Pace, Applied Materials
Jabil, Flex and Foxconn engineers are joining Cisco TDEs in attending Cisco’s week-long RFID deep dive training.
And there wasn’t a Cisco mandate, as Walmart and the Dept of Defense has made to drive lots of RFID implementation in industry. Cisco can go that route or collaborate with our partners to create a system that benefits both Cisco and the partners.
We would do this because RFID has several use cases to benefit the partners and Cisco, across our supply chain.
There are several other RFID initiatives underway as part of IoT and FoF, including RFID integration in our products
We would deploy these readers in multiple locations at the DF sites and the SLCs.
We’ve got some rough numbers on the number of stations, cost of equipment, and system integration costs.
13 CTO sites, 4 BTS sites, 10 SLCs
What could we save?
We process about 12 million cartons a year. Each carton is typically scanned a minimum of 3 times.
Each manual scan requires labor at a cost. It also requires inventory tracking and audits. Just looking at labor costs for 4 of 8 SLCs that have reported back, we see an opportunity to address a more than $15 million dollar annual cost. This does not include Cisco resources for process deviation (lost cartons, mis-shipments) or cost of rebuilds (mfg. replacement orders).
We would propose deploying at one DF and SLC combination, ensuring everything works, and then deploying to remaining DF sites and SLCs over the following 4 quarters, which would spread out CAPEX and OPEX costs
OUT OF SCOPE
R2A
Anything post ship confirm out of QTC: RMA, Service
Anything OM LSS R12 dependent (ex. Customer Arrival date)
Not intended to replace functional transactional tools: e-Business suite, OTM, BMW, Kinaxis, etc.
CCW
One key risk is the inability to translate productivity gains into Cisco cost savings. We will work with the LMS partner managers to talk to our partners, review the mutual benefits of RFID to increase productivity, and agree on cost reductions tied to measureable productivity gains.
What we are looking from you is your commitment for resources to refine the cost and benefit estimates, and to create an implementation plan so we can decide whether to fund the implementation at an initial DF and SLC combination.
Consider how to gather more data for analysis and deploy to mobile app