SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 175
Somatic hybridization:
a base line for crop improvement
John P. Helgeson
USDA/ARS, Dept of Plant Pathology
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Protoplast Preparation and Somatic Hybrids
• In many cases the somatic hybrids can be
crossed back to one or the other of the two
parents.
• In that way the DNA of a wild species can
be incorporated into a breeding line of a
crop species.
• Our work has been done primarily with
potato and its wild relatives.
Somatic Hybridization
Using somatic hybrids to introgress important genes into
potato
Potato plants growing in a
test tube
Somatic Hybridization
Potato leaves suspended in wall-dissolving enzyme solution
Protoplasts collected in
a Babcock bottle
Somatic Hybridization
Protoplasts float to top in
sugar solution
Somatic Hybridization
Potato leaf protoplasts immediately
after digestion of cell walls
Close up of protoplasts - green discs are
chloroplasts
Two potato leaf protoplasts about to fuse
Fusion products begin to divide on
nutrient medium
Further cell divisions yield masses of
cells called “Calli.”
The calli turn green in light
If the conditions are right, small
shoots emerge from the green calli
The shoots on calli will develop into
new plants
One
often
gets
many
shoots
from
each of
the calli.
• The shoots can be excised from
the calli and rooted on nutrient
media in a test tube. This will
result in a whole new potato
plant.
• The new potato plant can be
grown in a test tube
Somatic Hybridization
A form of DNA
fingerprinting
called RFLP
analysis can be
used to
demonstrate
that one really
does have a
somatic hybrid.
Note that the somatic hybrids have the DNA
bands from S. bulbocastanum and potato
PI203900, the parents of the hybrids.
• Characteristics of both of the
combined species can be expressed
in the somatic hybrids.
• Note the purple stems vs the green
stems and compound vs simple
leaves stems in the following slide
Somatic Hybridization
S.
bulbocastanum
Potato
Somatic
hybrid
S.
bulbocastanum
Potato
Somati
c
We have been using this procedure
to capture disease resistances
from wild potato species that can’t
be crossed with the domestic
potato
Somatic Hybridization
Somatic hybrids obtained in the Helgeson Lab
S. brevidens PL 218228 (2x) + S. tuberosum
(4x)
S. brevidens PL 218228 (2x) + Russet Burbank
(4x)
S. brevidens PL 218228 (2x) + S. tuberosum
(2x)
S. bulbocastanumPL 245763 (2x) + S. tuberosum (4x)
S. bulbocastanumPL 245310 (2x) + S. tuberosum (4x)
S. cardiophyllum PL 279272 (2x) + S. brevidens
(2x)
S. commersonii PL 320266 (2x) + S. tuberosum
(4x)
S. commersonii PL 320266 (2x) + S. tuberosum
(2x)
S. etuberosum PL 245939 (2x) + S. tuberosum
Some new disease resistances from somatic hybrids
Disease/pathogen Somatic
hybrid
Late blight
Early blight
M. Chitwoodii
Erwinia Soft
rot
Bacterial wilt
PVY
PLRV
S. bulbocastanum + S. tuberosum
S. bulbocastanum + S. tuberosum
S. bulbocastanum + S. tuberosum
S. brevidens + S. tuberosum
S. commersonii + S. tuberosum
S. etuberosum + S. tuberosum
S. brevidens + S. tuberosum
We have been able to capture late
blight resistance from the wild
potato species, Solanum
bulbocastanum and, using sexual
crosses of the somatic hybrid we
have developed a number of
highly resistant potato breeding
lines.
Somatic Hybridization
Tubers of Solanum bulbocastanum,
source of the “RB” gene
S. bulbcastanum in the field
at Hancock, Wisconsin
View of test field - Hancock Research
Station. The green plants are those
with the new resistance gene
Backcross 1
line (J101- K27)
in field at
Hancock, WI
The field
received no
fungicide and
the dead plants
are from the
cultivar Russet
Burbank, killed
by late blight.
BC1 line J138A12 in Toluca, Mexico.
The arrow points to what is left of a
plant of the susceptible cultivar
“Alpha.”
The resistance to late
blight is effective in
Toluca Mexico, where
the variation in the late
blight organisms is the
greatest in the world.
By somatic hybridizations such as
those of potato and S.
bulbocastanum we hope to
introduce new genes into potato so
that pesticide use can be
decreased substantially.
For more information contact John Helgeson,
JPH@plantpath.wisc.edu
Protoplast Preparation and Somatic Hybrids
SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION
Involves fusion of two distantly related,
to closely related plant protoplasts at
intraspecific, interspecific, intergeneric,
and interfamily levels, with subsequent
regeneration of hybrid cells into hybrid
plants.
SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION BASICS
1. In vitro culture
2. Protoplast isolation and purification
3. Protoplast fusion
4. Growth and selection of somatic
hybrid tissues
5. Confirmation of hybridity
6. Exploitation of S.H.
2. PROTOPLAST ISOLATION
 Protoplast:
 Bacterial, fungal or plant cell deprived of its rigid
wall but with its plasma membrane intact
 Procedure for protoplast isolation
1. Mechanical production
(Klercker, 1892)
2. Enzymatic digestion
(EC Cocking, 1960)
3. METHODS OF PPT. FUSION
 Spontaneous
 Mechanical
 Induced
Polyethylene glycol (PEG)
Electrofusion
ELECTROFUSION
 A two-stage process:
1. A non-uniform AC field stimulates close
protoplast plasmamembrane contact
1. Short pulse of DC stimulates breakdown
of closely aligned plasma membranes
producing pores through which cytoplasm
of adjacent ppts. flows and causes fusion
PROTOPLAST FUSION TECHNIQUE
A
B
SH
A+B
A
PROTOPLAST FUSION PRODUCTS
Bi-nucleate
HETEROKARYON
LOSS OF ONE
NUCLEUS
NUCLEAR
FUSION
CYTOPLASMIC HYBRIDS
(CYBRIDS)
Somatic hybrid
4. SELECTION OF SOMATIC HYBRIDS
1. Manual selection
Physical isolation of the hybrid (using physical
differentiation like pigmentation orregenerability)
2. Dual fluorescent labeling system
(FDA labelled green florescing protoplasts fused
with RIT labelled protoplasts emitting a red
fluorescence
3. Complementation
Procedures inhibiting growth of homokaryons
4. FACS
physical sorting of heterokaryons
5. CONFIRMATION OF HYBRIDITY
 Morphological
 Cytological
 Chromosome counting
 Flow cytometry
 Molecular techniques
BENEFITS OF SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION
 SHs are not GMOs
 Elimination of crossing barriers
 Specific addition of the genomes of two plants
 Unique combinations of nuclear and organellar
genomes generate novel germplasm
 No strict maternal inheritance of organelles
LIMITATIONS OF SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION
 a) Somatic hybridization does not always produce
plants that give fertile and viable seeds.
b) Tedious selection procedures
c) After confirmation, hybrid material is field
evaluated to check stable integration of
desired character
d) Protoclonal variations, chromosomal
elimination, organelle segregation etc. all lead
to variable somatic hybrids
Applications of Somatic Hybridization and
Cybridization in Scion and Rootstock
Improvement with Focus on Citrus
CITRUS CULTIVAR IMPROVEMENT
Ineffective results of conventional breeding
owing to:
 High heterozygosity
 Pollen and ovule sterility
 Sexual incompatibility
 Nucellar polyembryony
 Juvenility
Citrus Scion improvement objectives:
Seedlessness
Fruit quality traits
Root Stocks:
Better adaptability to biotic/
abiotic stresses
Tree size control
Scion Improvement
Triploid production:
1.By crossing 4X SH with 2X parent
 creation of allotetraploid SH (2X + 2X= 4X)
 4X SH are then used in interploidal
crosses as breeding parents (4X x 2X) = 3X
2.By fusion of diploid and haploid parents
creation of triploid SH (2X + 1X)
3. Cybridization
 creation of cybrids to transfer Satsuma CMS
cytoplasm to seedy cultivars
Rootstock Improvement
- somatic hybridization of complementary parents
building a better sour orange
-Production of Tetrazygs
– fusion of selected mandarin + pummelo parents
SWEET ORANGE EMBRYOGENIC CALLUS
SWEET ORANGE ORGANOGENESIS
ADVENTITIOUS SHOOT BUD INDUCTION
SUCROSE-MANNITOL GRADIENT FOR
PROTOPLAST PURIFICATION
SWEET ORANGE SUSPENSION CULTURE PROTOPLASTS
LEAF-DERIVED CITRUS PROTOPLASTS
TYPICAL SUSPENSION PROTOPLAST + LEAF
PROTOPLAST PEG-INDUCED FUSION
Fusion products culture and regeneration
Ploidy Analysis Showing Diploid and Tetraploid Peaks
Using a Partec Tabletop Flow Cytometer
CITRUS SOMATIC HYBRID PLANT
NOVA + SUCCARI SOMATIC HYBRID TREE
‘Tacle’ – a seedless triploid mandarin hybrid produced by A. Starrantino.
Somatic Hybrid Pollen Parents Used For Mandarin
Citrus Fruit Improvement at CREC:
1. Nova mandarin + Succari sweet orange
2. Valencia sweet orange + Murcott tangor
3. Succari sweet orange + Murcott tangor
4. Rohde Red Valencia + Dancy mandarin
5. Succari + Page tangelo
6. Valencia + Page tangelo
7. Succari + Minneola tangelo
8. Hamlin sweet orange + Ponkan mandarin
9. Hamlin + LB8-4 (Clementine x Minneola)
10.Valencia + (Robinson x Temple)
11.Pink Marsh grapefruit + Murcott
12.Succari + Dancy
13. Murcott + LB8-9 tangelo
14. Nova + Osceola mandarin
Interploid hybridization using tetraploid somatic
hybrids as pollen parents to produce seedless
triploids for mandarin improvement:
- more than 12000 triploids using pollen from
somatic hybrids
(under direction of FG Gmitter,CREC)
- oldest hybrids are now fruiting and most are
seedless!!!!!
NOVA + SUCCARI SOMATIC HYBRID FRUIT
(father of several hundred triploid progeny)
VALENCIA + (ROBINSON X TEMPLE)
HARVESTED JANUARY 22,2004
BRIX=11.4, ACID=0.57, RATIO=20
3 SEEDS/FRUIT
ROHDE RED VALENCIA + DANCY
HARVESTED JANUARY 28,2004
BRIX=11.4, ACID=1.57, RATIO= 7.26
3 SEEDS/FRUIT
NOVA + OSCEOLA
HARVESTED DECEMBER 6, 2005
BRIX= 14.8, ACID=1.15, RATIO= 12.9
New triploid mandarin hybrids following embryo
rescue and micro-grafting (F.G. Gmitter, Jr.)
Seedless fresh fruit varieties at the
Tetraploid level?
Seedless somatic hybrids with excellent
fruit quality:
1. Succari sweet orange + Page tangelo
- peelable, early maturing, excellent flavor
2. Valencia sweet orange + Murcott tangor
- peelable, excellent flavor
Succari + Page
fruits taken on
Sep 27, 2002
(seedless)
Valencia +
Murcott,
fruits taken on
Jan 15, 2003
(nearly
seedless)
PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF CYBRIDIZATION:
Transfer of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) from the
seedless Satsuma mandarin to other superior seedy diploid
commercial cultivars via symmetric fusion.
Objective: remove seed from successful cultivars without
otherwise altering cultivar integrity.
Cybrid combinations produced to date (Grosser, Guo,
Prasad and Deng):
1. Guoqing Satsuma + Hirado Buntan pink pummelo
2. Guoqing Satsuma + Sunburst mandarin
3. Guoqing Satsuma + (Clementine x Murcott) Lee hybrid
4. Guoqing Satsuma + LB8-9 (Clementine x Minneola)
Somatic cybrid plant of Hirado Buntan pink pummelo containing
Guoqing Satsuma cytoplasm (mitochondrial genome).
Somatic cybrid plant of Sunburst tangerine containing
Guoqing Satsuma cytoplasm (mitochondrial genome).
Somatic cybrid plant of Lee hybrid (Murcott x Clementine) containing
Guoqing Satsuma cytoplasm (mitochondrial genome).
ROOTSTOCK
IMPROVEMENT
An Exercise in
“Creative Packaging”
WHAT DO WE NEED?
- Objectives
- Wide adaptability, tolerance of high pH, calcareous
and heavy soils
- Resistance to CTV-induced quick decline
- Resistance to Citrus Blight
- High yields of good fruit quality
- Optimum tree size for harvesting
- New rootstocks must be able to tolerate mechanical
damage inflicted by Diaprepes larvae, and resist
secondary infections of Phytophthora nicotianae and
P. palmivora, and other invading fungi
- Must be capable of vigorous root growth following
Diaprepes damage.
- tolerance of salinity in some areas
SOMATIC HYBRID BREEDING PARENTS BEING USED FOR
ROOTSTOCKS IMPOVEMENT:
Females (produce high % of zygotic seed):
1.Nova mandarin + Hirado Buntan sdl. pummelo
2.Sour orange + rangpur
3.Succari sweet orange + Hirado Buntan sdl.
pummelo Pollen Parents:
1.Cleopatra + Argentine trifoliate orange
2.Cleopatra + Swingle citrumelo
3.Sour orange + Carrizo
4.Red Marsh grapefruit + Argentine trifoliate orange
5.Cleopatra + Sour orange
6.Sour orange + Palestine sweet lime
7.Sour orange + Flying dragon trifoliate orange
8.Cleopatra + rangpur (for salinity tolerance)
9.Succari sweet orange + Argentine trifoliate orange
10.Nova mandarin + C. ichangensis
11.Hamlin sweet orange + Microcitrus papuana
NEW STRATEGY:
BREEDING SOMATIC HYBRID ROOTSTOCKS AT THE
TETRAPLOID LEVEL
– CREATION OF ‘TETRAZYGS’
-Use of allotetraploid somatic hybrid breeding
parents allows the mixing of genes from 3-4
diploid rootstocks at once.
-Progeny can be screened at the seed/seedling
level for wide soil adaptability and Phytophthora
resistance.
-Products can have direct rootstock potential
including adequate polylembryony, ability to
control tree size due to polyploidy, and improved
disease resistance.
Selection of progeny from crosses designed for salinity tolerance:
healthy seedlings from Nova + HBpummelo with Cleo + rangpur
Selection of progeny from crosses designed for salinity tolerance: healthy
seedlings from Nova + HBpummelo with Cleo + rangpur
Salinity Tolerance
Fully recovered “tetrazyg” cuttings.
(Nova + HBPummelo) x (Cleo +
Arg. Trifoliate orange)
“TETRAZYGS”
Tetrazyg nucellar liners prior to budding at commercial nursery
5 year old Valencia on Orange#14, between two rough lemon trees
planted at the same time – blight resets in Alligator grove (Mr. Lee)
HLB tolerance from new rootstocks?
Vernia/Orange #4 Vernia/Orange #19 New
photos
New photos of trees PCR+ since last September – St.
Helena
Rootstock improvements regarding HLB are like likely
to come in stages:
First stage: Rootstocks that reduce the frequency of
HLB infection, and reduce the severity of the disease
once infected – these will still require efficient psyllid
control and optimized production systems.
Second stage: Potential rootstock mitigation of the
disease – research is underway to possibly identify
rootstocks that can protect the entire tree –
regardless of the scion. Psyllid control may not be
necessary. No horticultural performance data would
be available on such selections initially, but the
hybrids would have good rootstock pedigree.
Concluding Remarks:
1.Tolerance/resistance to canker and HLB is being discovered in commercial quality
CREC scion and rootstock germplasm – making these epidemics a mixed blessing for
our breeding program. 2. Successful rootstocks should be tolerant/resistant to all
known vascular diseases of citrus including CTV-quick decline and blight (is there a
blight/HLB synergy, the double whammy??). Commercial rootstocks are lacking in
this regard – especially Swingle and Carrizo!
3.Management programs should minimize any stress on the trees, including
nutritional or water stresses; and provide constant nutrition. Don’t forget about
ground fertilizer applications!
4.New rootstock candidates are showing a lower frequency of HLB infection, and
reduced severity of disease symptoms once trees become infected. Tolerant
rootstock types being identified include complex tetrazygs, citranges, citrandarins,
and sour orange types.
5.Complex new rootstocks in combination with the right tree care and good psyllid
control have potential to prevent and/or mitigate HLB. Imagine the potential of
ACPS when combined with the use of HLB-tolerant, tree-size controlling precocious
rootstocks!
6.Differences observed in HLB responses among unselected new rootstock
candidates suggest great potential for the selection of rootstock genotypes that
can completely protect trees – a solution for all commercial scions. Stay tuned for
the second wave of new rootstocks! THERE IS HOPE!
CITRUS BLIGHT
-still a major killer of trees in Florida
-if you solve the sour orange problem, you
solve blight!
-trifoliate orange hybrids susceptible –
strategy is to dilute trifoliate contribution
while retaining disease resistance and fruit
quality attributes
-field screening of new hybrids by resetting
in blight holes– Primary cooperator is Mr.
Orie Lee, Secondary cooperator David and
Sharon Garrett.
-build in tree size control along with the
CTV resistance
NEW STRATEGY FOR BUILDING A
BETTER SOUR ORANGE
-Somatic Hybridization of Superior
Pummelo + Mandarin parents. - All
pummelos are not created equal. We have
developed an effective greenhouse screen
for selecting zygotic pummelo seedlings
adapted to high pH, calcareous soils, and
that are resistant to both Phytophthora
nicotianae and P. palmivora. A
trememdous amount of genetic
diversity can be quickly screened.
Superior individuals will serve as fusion
partners with selected mandarins
including widely adapted Shekwasha
and C. amblycarpa. Resulting somatic
hybrids should have tremendous
rootstock potential.
SOMATIC HYBRID ROOTSTOCKS – TREE SIZE CONTROL
McTeer Sandridge Trial – Planted 1995 - Data from 2003 harvest
Rootstock boxes/tree S.S./box Avg. Diam. Yield Eff. Kg/m3
SO + FD 2.64 6.73 3.2 0.46
FD 2.0 5.74 3.1 0.36
Succ + APT 3.17 6.52 3.5 0.45
Cleo + APT 3.67 6.21 3.7 0.40
SO + rangpur 4.11 6.10 3.8 0.40
Swingle 4.89 5.70 4.0 0.37
SO + CZO 4.89 6.10 4.1 0.36
Cleo 5.71 6.16 4.4 0.36
Palestine SL 7.0 5.32 4.8 0.29
EFFECT OF POLYPLOIDY ON TREE SIZE (BASED ON % OF CARRIZO AVERAGE CANOPY
VOLUME) – SWEET ORANGE SCION, MCTEER TRIAL, DUNDEE, SOMATIC HYBRIDS
INDICATED BY PLUS SIGN. TREES 4-7 YEARS OLD.
Rough lemon 8166 141
CARRIZO 100
Cleo 100
Kinkoji 95
C-35 90
Sour orange + Carrizo 84
Swingle 78
Sour orange + rangpur 65
WGFT+50-7 63*
Cleo + Carrizo 61
Cleo + Argentine trifoliate orange 58
Nova + Hirado Buntan pummelo zyg. 56
Cleo + rangpur 54
SO+50-7 51*
Nova + Palestine sweet lime 49
Milam + Kinkoji 42
Changsha + Benton 38
Cleo + Swingle 35
Cleo + Flying Dragon 35
Hamlin + Flying Dragon 34
Flying Dragon 33
Sour orange + Benton 29
Overview of somatic hybrid seedlings at Reed Brothers
Nursery - thanks to Chuck Reed and Mike Baker
Test for CTV-induced quick-decline: selected pummelo seedlings are
budded with MCA-13-CTV positive sweet orange. After 2+ years in the
field, 20 best identified.
NEW MANDARIN + PUMMELO SOMATIC
HYBRIDS PRODUCED DURING 2006.
W. Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-3
W. Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-7
W. Murcott + HBP sdl JL-12
W. Murcott + Large Pink sdl 7-2-99-2
W. Murcott + Sha Tian You sdl 4-3-99-2
W. Murcott + HBP sdl 5-1-99-2
Nova + Large Pink sdl 7-2-99-2
Nova + Pummelo 8-2-99-1
Nova + Siamese sweet sdl 7-3-99-1
Nova + Ling Ping Yau sdl 8-1-99-4B
Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-5
red = pummelo parent tolerant of CTV-
induced quick-decline after 2 years
in field
Vigorous new mandarin + pummelo somatic hybrid:
Amblycarpa + Hirado buntan sdl. 5-1-99-1B
Field Assay for Tristeza
Virus Resistance – Sour orange not
growing, Mandarin
+ Pummelo somatic hybrid
not affected by virus!
Sour orange
Amenability to Traditional Seed Propagation – 2006
Tree Size Controlling Somatic Hybrids
Hybrid Seeds per Fruit Seed Type
WGFT + 50-7 20 Nucellar
Changsha + 50-7 17 Nucellar
SO + 50-7 14 Nucellar
SO+Carrizo 13 Nucellar
Data: Julie Gmitter and Chunxian Chen
ROOTSTOCK
IMPROVEMENT
An Exercise in
“Creative Packaging”
WHAT DO WE NEED?
- Wide adaptability, tolerance of high pH, calcareous
and heavy soils
- Resistance to CTV-induced quick decline
- Resistance to Citrus Blight
- High yields of good fruit quality
- Optimum tree size for harvesting
- New rootstocks must be able to tolerate mechanical
damage inflicted by Diaprepes larvae, and resist
secondary infections of Phytophthora nicotianae and
P. palmivora, and other invading fungi
- Must be capable of vigorous root growth following
Diaprepes damage.
- tolerance of salinity in some areas
Our primary strategy for rootstock
improvement has been to produce
allotetraploid somatic hybrids by
combining complementary diploid
rootstocks.
Tetraploid rootstocks usually (but
not always) have a built in tree-size
control mechanism due to some
unknown physiological reaction with the
diploid scion.
SOMATIC HYBRID ROOTSTOCKS – TREE SIZE CONTROL
McTeer Sandridge Trial – Planted 1995 - Data from 2003 harvest
Rootstock boxes/tree S.S./box Avg. Diam. Yield Eff. Kg/m3
SO + FD 2.64 6.73 3.2 0.46
FD 2.0 5.74 3.1 0.36
Succ + APT 3.17 6.52 3.5 0.45
Cleo + APT 3.67 6.21 3.7 0.40
SO + rangpur 4.11 6.10 3.8 0.40
Swingle 4.89 5.70 4.0 0.37
SO + CZO 4.89 6.10 4.1 0.36
Cleo 5.71 6.16 4.4 0.36
Palestine SL 7.0 5.32 4.8 0.29
EFFECT OF POLYPLOIDY ON TREE SIZE (BASED ON % OF CARRIZO AVERAGE
CANOPY VOLUME) – SWEET ORANGE SCION, MCTEER TRIAL, DUNDEE, SOMATIC
HYBRIDS INDICATED BY PLUS SIGN. TREES 4-7 YEARS OLD.
Rough lemon 8166 141
CARRIZO 100
Cleo 100
Kinkoji 95
C-35 90
Sour orange + Carrizo 84
Swingle 78
Sour orange + rangpur 65
WGFT+50-7 63*
Cleo + Carrizo 61
Cleo + Argentine trifoliate orange 58
Nova + Hirado Buntan pummelo zyg. 56
Cleo + rangpur 54
SO+50-7 51*
Nova + Palestine sweet lime 49
Milam + Kinkoji 42
Changsha + Benton 38
Cleo + Swingle 35
Cleo + Flying Dragon 35
Hamlin + Flying Dragon 34
Flying Dragon 33
Sour orange + Benton 29
Overview of somatic hybrid seedlings at Reed Brothers
Nursery - thanks to Chuck Reed and Mike Baker
OTHER NEW SOMATIC HYBRID ROOTSTOCKS
PRODUCED RECENTLY:
Milam + Kinjoji
Changsha + 50-7 trifoliate orange
White grapefruit + 50-7 trifoliate orange
Sour orange + 50-7 trifoliate orange
Sour orange + Benton citrange
Amblycarpa + Carrizo citrange
Amblycarpa + C-35 citrange
Amblycarpa + Benton citrange
Amblycarpa + Volk
Amblycarpa + Flying Dragon
Amblycarpa + Rubidoux trifoliate orange
Murcott + Rubidoux trifoliate orange
Amblycarpa + 50-7 trifoliate orange
SOUR ORANGE ROOTSTOCK
- formerly the most important rootstock worldwide
- widely adapted to most soil types, tolerant of blight
- produces fruit of high quality, holds fruit well
-- very nursery friendly
- no longer being used due to susceptibility to quick
decline disease caused by citrus tristeza virus
- introduction of the brown citrus aphid (an efficient
tristeza vector) to many areas threatens existing trees
- replacement rootstock badly needed!
WHAT IS SOUR ORANGE?
RAPD Markers Identified in Various Citrus
Genotypes For Analysis of Origin (from Nicolosi et
al. 2000).
Genotype Markers Markers shared with
Extra
Pumm, Mand, Citron, Sweet, Sour
sweet or. 71 35 36
sour or. 84 42 36
6
grapefr. 72 45 27
lemon 78 45 31
2
Volk 56 6 27 22
Screening Zygotic Pummelo Seedlings
from a superior pummelo seed parent
Screening of Open-Pollinated Pummelo Seedlings for Tolerance of
Phytophthora and High pH, Calcareous Soil
Tree I.D. Pummelo Variety % Seedling Survival
DPI 8-1 Liang Ping Yau sdlg. (China) 69%
DPI 7-2 Large Pink Pummelo (SE Asia) 67%
J.L.C. Hirado Buntan sdlg. (Japan) 56%
DPI 5-4 Red Shaddock Pummelo (SE Asia) 47%
DPI 4-3 Sha Ten Yau sdlg. (China) 30%
DPI 7-3 Siamese Sweet (Thailand) 27%
DPI 4-4 Siamese Pummelo (Thailand) 18%
DPI 5-1 Hirado Buntan sdlg. (Japan) 17%
DP”I 8-2 Pummelo NW (Florida) 12%
DPI 7-1 Chinese Pummelo (China) 4%
DPI 6-1 Kao Phuang (Thailand) 0%
>200 seedlings selected for fusion experiments
NEW MANDARIN + PUMMELO SOMATIC
HYBRIDS PRODUCED DURING 2000-2003.
Murcott + Hirado Buntan pummelo (HBP)
Murcott + HBP sdl-JL1
Murcott + Chandler sdl-80
Murcott + Siamese Pummelo sdl 4-4-99-6
Murcott + Chandler sdl-11-A1 (best in Diaprepes test)
Amblycarpa + HBP
Amblycarpa + Chandler pummelo
Amblycarpa + Chandler sdl-69
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-5-1-99-1B
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL2B
Amblycarpa + LingPingYau-sdl-8-1-99-4A
Amblycarpa + Large Pink Pummelo sdl-7-2-99-5
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL1
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL4
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-5-1-99-3
Shekwasha + HBP
Shekwasha + Chandler
Shekwasha + HBP sdl-JL2B
Test for CTV-induced quick-decline: selected pummelo seedlings are
budded with MCA-13-CTV positive sweet orange. After 2+ years in the
field, 20 best identified.
NEW MANDARIN + PUMMELO SOMATIC
HYBRIDS PRODUCED DURING 2004-2006.
Amblycarpa + Siamese Pummelo sdl 4-4-99-6
Amblycarpa + Siamese Sweet sdl. 7-3-99-1
Amblycarpa + Shao Tian You sdl. 4-3-99-2
Amblycarpa + Hirado Buntan Pink (HBP) sdl. JL-3
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl. JL-5
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl. JL-7
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl JL-12
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl 5-1-99-2
Amblycarpa + HBP sdl. MG-10
Amblycarpa + Chandler sdl-11-A1 (best in Diaprepes test)
Changsha + HBP sdl. JL-3
Changsha + HBP sdl. JL-5
Changsha + HBP sdl. JL-7
Page + HBP sdl. JL-3
Page + HBP sdl. JL-4
Page + HBP sdl. JL-5 red = pummelo parent tolerant of
CTV-
Page + HBP sdl. JL-7 induced quick-decline after 2
years
NEW MANDARIN + PUMMELO SOMATIC
HYBRIDS PRODUCED DURING 2006.
W. Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-3
W. Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-7
W. Murcott + HBP sdl JL-12
W. Murcott + Large Pink sdl 7-2-99-2
W. Murcott + Sha Tian You sdl 4-3-99-2
W. Murcott + HBP sdl 5-1-99-2
Nova + Large Pink sdl 7-2-99-2
Nova + Pummelo 8-2-99-1
Nova + Siamese sweet sdl 7-3-99-1
Nova + Ling Ping Yau sdl 8-1-99-4B
Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-5
red = pummelo parent tolerant of CTV-
induced quick-decline after 2 years
in field
Vigorous new mandarin + pummelo somatic hybrid:
Amblycarpa + Hirado buntan sdl. 5-1-99-1B
Figure.1. Leaf morphology of sour orange and some new somatic
hybrids of mandarin + pummelo (‘mandelos’). 1- Sour orange; 2 -
Amblycarpa + C. grandis ‘Chandler’; 3 - Amblycarpa + HBP (Hirado
Buntan Pummelo); 4 - Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL-2B; 5 - Amblycarpa +
HBP sdl-5-1-99-1B; 6 - Amblycarpa + ‘LingPing Yau’-sdl-8-1-99-4A.
Gel -1
Primer c-11
Gel -2
Primer c-11
Gel -4 Primer c-
64
Gel -3 Primer c-64
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
RAPD patterns of new mandarin + pummelo interspecific somatic hybrids
and their parental genotypes.
Gels-1 and 3 are products amplified by operon primers C-11 and C-64 respectively. Lane 1- 1kb marker; 2- Amblycarpa
mandarin (C. amblycarpa); 3- Amblycarpa + ‘Siamese’ sdl-4-4-99-6; 4- ‘Siamese’ sdl-4-4-99-6; 5- Amblycarpa + ‘Chandler’
sdl. A1-11; 6- ‘Chandler’ sdl. A1-11; 7- Amblycarpa + ‘Large Pink’ sdl-7-2-99-5; 8- ‘Large Pink’ sdl-7-2-99-5; 9- Amblycarpa +
HBP sdl-JL-4; 10- HBP sdl-JL-4; 11- Amblycarpa.
Gels-2 and 4 are products amplified by operon primers C-11 and C-64 respectively. Lane 1- 1kb marker; 2- Amblycarpa
mandarin (C. amblycarpa); 3- Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL-1; 4- HBP sdl-JL-1; 5-‘Succari’; 6- ‘Succari’ + C.grandis ‘Hirado
Buntan Pink’ (HBP); 7- C.grandis ‘Hirado Buntan Pink’ (HBP); 8- ‘Murcott’ tangor; 9-‘Murcott’ + ‘Chandler’ sdl. A1-11; 10-
‘Chandler’ sdl.A1-11; 11- ‘Murcott’ + ‘Siamese’ sdl-4-4-99-6; 12- ‘Siamese’ sdl-4-4-99-6.
(White arrows indicate complementary bands from the embryogenic parents and red diamond arrows from the pummelo
leaf parents).
Field Assay for Tristeza
Virus Resistance – Sour orange not
growing, Mandarin
+ Pummelo somatic hybrid
not affected by virus!
Sour orange
Amenability to Traditional Seed Propagation – 2006
Tree Size Controlling Somatic Hybrids
Hybrid Seeds per Fruit Seed Type
WGFT + 50-7 20 Nucellar
Changsha + 50-7 17 Nucellar
SO + 50-7 14 Nucellar
SO+Carrizo 13 Nucellar
Data: Julie Gmitter and Chunxian Chen
Protocol for Citrus somatic hybridization
Suspension Protoplast Leaf protoplast Protoplast fusion
Leaf incubation Suspension incubation Protoplast ring
Two Cells Stage Four Cells Stage Multiple cells Stage
Globular Heart Torpedo Somatic hybrid
Somatic hybrids of W murcott + Snack
Development of hybrid tissue via somatic embryogenesis
Genetic Manipulation of Potato
(Solanum tuberosum L.)
A B
A: Leaf and stem explants of S. chacoense
B: Shoot regeneration from S.
chacoense leaves
C D
C: Regeneration from leaf and stem
explants of Desiree
D: Regeneration from leaf
Explant of Desiree
E
F
E: Leaf-derived protoplasts
of S. chacoense
F: Suspension-derived protoplasts
of Desiree
Culture of Protoplasts
IPE FPE
Plating density
Culture methods
Liquid culture Agarose droplets
5x104, 1x105, 1.5x105 ,2x105
Plating efficiency
G H
I J
G: Dividing protoplast of Desiree H: Agarose droplet culture of
Desiree protoplasts
I: Protoplast calli on proliferation
medium
J: Regenerating protoplast calli of
Desiree
Somatic Hybridisation
1:1 mix. of Desiree and S. chacoense protoplasts
Electrofusion
Incubation (30 min.) and centrifugation of fused protoplasts
Droplet culture in MS (modified) medium (4-6 weeks)
Transfer microcolonies to CG/LSR1 medium (6-8 weeks)
Transfer heterotic calli to LSR2 medium (6-8 weeks)
Rooting of shoots and transfer to glasshouse
K
L M
K: Fusion of Desiree and S. chacoense protoplasts
L: Somatic hybrid callus M: Regeneration from hybrid callus
N
N: Plants of S. chacoense (L), Desiree (R), and somatic hybrids (centre)
P
O
O: Flower of S. chacoense
P: Flower of Somatic hybrid
Q
Q: Flower of Desiree
S
T
U
U: Tubers of Desiree
T: Tubers of Somatic hybrid
S: Tubers of S. chacoense
R
R: Leaves of S. chacoense (L), Desiree (R) and Somatic hybrid (Centre)
R1: 2n=6x=72 chromosomes of a somatic hybrid
R1
V
V: RAPD profiles generated by primer OPA-2. Lane 1: potato cv. Desiree, Lane 2: S.
chacoense, Lane 3: 1:1 mix. of parental DNA, Lanes 4-21: somatic hybrids.
Molecular marker = 100 bp.
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION
Somatic hybridization involves fusion of two
distantly related, to closely related plant
protoplasts at intraspecific, interspecific,
intergeneric, and interfamily levels, with sub
sequent regeneration of hybrid cells into
hybrid plants.
SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION
BASICS
1. In vitro culture
2. Protoplast isolation and purification
3. Protoplast fusion
4. Growth and selection of somatic hybrid
tissues
5. Confirmation of hybridity
6. Exploitation of S.H.
1. PROTOPLAST ISOLATION
 Source material
 Procedure for protoplast isolation
1. Mechanical production
2. Enzymatic digestion
PROTOPLAST FUSION AND REGENERATION OF
SOMATIC HYBRIDS
 Protoplast fusion must occur before new walls of
plant ppts
 New walls begin to regenerate within 2-5 minutes of
isolation
 Detect with UV microscopy and use of Calcafluor
stain
 Mitosis occurs about 2-7 days after isolation
 Colonies seen in 1-3 weeks
METHODS OF PPT. FUSION
Spontaneous
 Fuse during isolation (callus ppt)
 May contain 2-40 nuclei
 Thought to be due to coalescence of plasmosdesmatal
connections between cells
 Prevented by strong plasmolysis
Mechanical
protoplasts are brought into intimate physical contact mechanically under
microscope using micromanipulator and perfusion micropipette. This
micropipette is partially blocked within 1 mm of the tip by a sealed
glass rod. In this way the protoplasts are retained and compressed by
the flow of liquid. By this technique occasional fusion of protoplast has
been
Induced
 Sodium nitrate (NaNo3)
 Artificial sea water
 Lysozyme
 High pH/Ca++
 Polyethylene glycol (PEG)
INDUCED FUSION
Sodium nitrate (Power et al., 1970)
 Transfer 1:1 mix of protoplasts to 0.25M NaNO3, incubate for 35 min. and
then centrifuge (200 xg), ppt pellet kept at 300 C for 30 min for fusion,fusion
mix replaced with 0.1% NaNO3 for 15 min. and washed.
 Low rate of heterokaryons (leaf ppt.)
 Not in use
High pH/Ca
++
(Kelier and Melchers, 1973)
 A calcium solution buffered at high pH induces aggregation of the
protoplasts and their fusion. (Solution of 0.4M mannitol containing 0.05 M CaCl2 with
pH at 10.5, 370 C)
 Ca
++
reduces the potential of the surface negative charge on protoplasts,
facilitating protoplast adhesion. (-ve charge due to intramembranous phosphate
groups)
 The high alkalinity (pH 9.5 - 10.4) induces the formation of
intramembranous lysophospholipids such as lysolecithin and
lysophosphatidyl -ethanolamine that increase membrane fluidity and fusion
INDUCED FUSION(CONT.)
 PEG (polyethylene glycol) – MWt. 200-20,000
Effective: 6000-8000 MW
 Reproducible high production of heterokaryons
 Add 0.6 ml of PEG solution to protoplast pellet
 Incubate at room temperatuer for 40 minutes with
occasional rocking
 After fusion, add 0.5 - 1.0 ml culture medium and
centrifuge
 Resuspend protoplasts in culture medium
 Disturbs the charge on the membrane
PEG-INDUCED FUSION
 A highly water-soluble, non-ionic weak surfactant
 A strong affinity of PEG for water causes local membrane dehydration and increased
fluidity
 PEG itself induces aggregation, but α-tocopherol present as an impurity in
commercial grade PEG, actually promotes membrane fusion
 When the chain of PEG polymer molecule is long enough (m.wt ≥ 1000) it may act as
a mol. bridge between the surfaces of adjacent protoplasts , allow agglutination to
occur
 PEG of molecular wt 2000-6000 is active in fusion and PEG 200 and 20,000 inactive
 Other compounds structurally-related to PEG namely PVP (Polyvinyl pyrrolidone),
PVA (Polyvinyl alcohol) and Polyglycerol are also known to induce fusion
 PEG can be used with other fusogens to enhance fusion frequency like
 Pre-incubation of protoplasts with lysozymes
 Combination of PEG with high pH and Ca++
 Addition of DMSO
 Factors influencing the efficiency of PEG-induced fusion are:
 Concentration, MWT. and purity of PEG
 pH, Osmolarity
 Method of application of solutions in fusion and their elution
 Physiological status of protoplasts
 Density of protoplasts in fusion solution
 Limitations
 Impurities in the commercial preparations of PEG cause cyto-toxicity or reduced
viability of fusion products
 Cause deformation of mitochondria
ELECTROFUSION
A two-stage process:
1.A non-uniform AC field stimulates close
protoplast plasmamembrane contact
2.Short pulse of DC stimulates breakdown of
closely aligned plasma membranes
producing pores through which cytoplasm of
adjacent ppts. flows and causes fusion
FACTORS AFFECTING ELECTROFUSION
 voltage, frequency and duration of AC and DC
 Shorter DC pulses (10-50 µs) at higher voltage (1000-2000 V/cm)
are preferable leading to higher viability and PE of ppts.
 Higher voltage of DC pulse facilitates overall fusion but t the cost of
binary fusions and viability of fusion products
 Ppt density, size and cell memebrane properties
 Mesophyll ppts tend to fuse readily than suspensioo-derived ones
 Large ppts tend to fuse more readily than smaller ones
 Calcium ions (micromolar concen.) are required for
better alignment of protoplasts
 Biochemical means have been tested to improve fusion
frequency
 (Avidin-biotin high affinity for Higher heterokaryon formation
 Exogenous protease (Dispase, Pronase E) to improve fusion freq. of
mammalian cells
PROTOPLAST FUSION
TECHNIQUE
A
B
SH
A+B
PROTOPLAST FUSION PRODUCTS
Bi-nucleate
HETEROKARYON
LOSS OF ONE
NUCLEUS
NUCLEAR
FUSION
CYTOPLASMIC HYBRIDS
(CYBRIDS)
Somatic hybrid
MAINTENANCE OF PROTOPLAST CULTURES
 Maintain the protoplast cultures initially for 10-15 days
under dark at 25-30°C
 Keep at low continuous illumination first at 1,000 lux and
gradually increase to 3,000 lux.
 Maintain relative humidity in containers during this period
to avoid desiccation.
3. SELECTION OF SOMATIC HYBRIDS
1. Manual selection
Physical isolation of the hybrid (using physical
differentiation like pigmentation or regenerability)
2. Dual fluorescent labeling system
(FDA labelled green florescing protoplasts fused with RIT
labelled protoplasts emitting a red fluorescence
3. Complementation
Procedures inhibiting growth of homokaryons
4, FACS
physical sorting of heterokaryons
4. CONFIRMATION OF HYBRIDITY
 Morphological
 Cytological
 Chromosome counting
 Flow cytometry
 Molecular techniques
PLOIDY ESTIMATION BY STOMATA OBSERVATION
1. COLLECT A MATURE LEAF
2. PEEL OFF THE SURFACE CELL LAYER FROM UNDERSURFACE OF THE LEAF USING A
PAIR OF TWEEZERS
3. PLACE THE CELL LAYER ON A SLIDE GLASS, AND STAIN WITH A DROP OF 2%
SILVER NITRATE SOLUTION
4. AFTER STAINING FOR 1 MINUTE, COVER WITH A COVER SLIP
5. COUNT THE NUMBER OF CHLOROPLAST GRAINS IN A GUARD CELL OF A STOMA
UNDER A MICROSCOPE
NOTE: APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF CHLOROPLAST GRAINS IN ONE GUARD CELL IS,
2X ··· 2-4
3X ··· 5-6
4X ··· 8-12
(SLIGHTLY VARIED DEPENDING ON SPECIES
AND CULTIVARS)
CHROMOSOME NUMBER IN SOMATIC HYBRIDS
 The chromosome number in the somatic hybrids is
generally varied compared to both of the parental
protoplasts.
 If the chromosome number in the hybrid is the sum of
the chromosomes of the two parental protoplasts, the
hybrid is said to be symmetric hybrid.
 Asymmetric hybrids have abnormal or wide variations
in the chromosome number than the exact total of two
species.
In 1972, Carlson and his associates produced the first
inter-specific somatic hybrid between Nicotiana glauca
and N. langsdorffii.
 In 1978, Melchers and his co-workers developed the
first inter-generic somatic hybrids between Solanum
tuberosum (potato) and Lycopersicon esculentum
(tomato). The hybrids are known as ‘Pomatoes or
Topatoes’.
BENEFITS OF
SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION
 Elimination of crossing barriers
 No loss of genetic information during the
formation of gametes
 Specific addition of the genomes of two plants
 Combination of complex traits without loosing
any gene
 Unique combinations of nuclear and organellar
genomes generate novel germplasm
 No strict maternal inheritance of organelles
Somatic hybrids developed in crop plants belonging to
following major families
Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Poaceae, Solanaceae, Rutaceae
· Interspecific hybrids have been obtained in Nicotiana,
Brinjal, Potato, Tomato,Brassica Medicago, Soyabean,
Sugarcane, Datura, Petunia, Sorghum etc.
· Intergeneric hybrids are obtained between Tomato x Potato,
Tomato x Tobacco, Festuca x Lolium, sugarcane x Bajra,
Wheat x Bajra, Brasica x Eruca etc.
· Inter tribal hybrids have been developed between Brassica
x Arabdopsis and Brassica x lesquerella Fendleri
LIMITATIONS OF SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION
 a) Somatic hybridization does not always produce plants that
give fertile and viable seeds.
b) There is genetic instability associated with protoplast
culture.
c) Tidious selection procedures
e) It is not certain that a specific character will get expressed
in somatic hybridization.
f) Regenerated plants obtained from somatic hybridization
are often variable due to protoclonal variations, chromosomal
elimination, organelle segregation etc.
g) Protoplast fusion between different species/genus is easy,
but the production of viable somatic hybrids is not always
possible.
CYBRIDS
 The cytoplasmic hybrids where the nucleus is derived from
only one parent and the cytoplasm is derived from both the
parents are referred to as cybrids.
 The process of formation of cybrids is called cybridization.
 During the process of cybridization and heterokaryon
formation, the nuclei are stimulated to segregate so that one
protoplast contributes to the cytoplasm while the other
contributes nucleus alone.
 The irradiation with gamma rays and X-rays and use of
metabolic inhibitors makes the protoplasts inactive and non-
dividing.
 Some of the genetic traits in certain plants are cytoplasmically
controlled. This includes certain types of male sterility,
resistance to certain antibiotics and herbicides. Therefore
cybrids are important for the transfer of cytoplasmic male
sterility (CMS), antibiotic and herbicide resistance in
agriculturally useful plants.
 Cybrids of Brassica raphanus that contain nucleus of B.
napus, chloroplasts of atrazinc resistant B. compestris and
male sterility from Raphanus sativas have been developed.
Status of mt. and ch genomes in somatic hybrids
The somatic hybrids have novel traits due to recombination in mitochondrial
genomes. While, Chloroplast genome of either one of the parents stays and
the other gets eliminated with the mitotic division in fusion products.
The chloroplasts and mitochondrial genomes of parental protoplasts behave
differently in the fusion products, that may be due to the structural
organization of theses organelles and their genomes. Mitochondrial
genomes are able to disperse and fuse in fusion products. While fusion of
chloroplast genomes is rare in higher plants.
Ch Genome possess two inverted repeats. Intramolecular homologous
recombination between these regions leads to the inversion of the unique
sequences inserted between them.
In contrast, the mitochondrial genome possesses at least two direct repeats,
which normally can recombine to generate two or more separate smaller
molecules containing intact the sequences of the parent molecule. This
model explains the apparent heterogeneity of the mitochondrial genome.
Recombination is the rule governing plant mitochondrial DNA organization.
Damage occurs when the free radical
encounters another molecule and seeks to
find another electron to pair its unpaired
electron. The free radical often pulls an
electron off a neighboring molecule,
causing the affected molecule to become a
free radical itself. The new free radical can
then pull an electron off the next molecule,
and a chemical chain reaction of radical
production occurs.
An antioxidant is a molecule that inhibits the oxidation of other
molecules. Oxidation is a chemical reaction that transfers electrons
or hydrogen from a substance to an oxidizing agent. Oxidation
reactions can produce free radicals. In turn, these radicals can start
chain reactions. When the chain reaction occurs in a cell, it can
cause damage or death to the cell. Antioxidants terminate these
chain reactions by removing free radical intermediates, and inhibit
other oxidation reactions. They do this by being oxidized
themselves, so antioxidants are often reducing agents such as
thiols, ascorbic acid, or polyphenols
When two or more protoplasts fuse to form a new cell, the parent nuclei may remain
separate or fuse to form a somatic hybrid. If one of the nuclei is lost after fusion the
cytoplasms of the two parent protoplasts will still coalesce and form what is known as
a cytoplasmic hybrid or cybrid. These contain nucleus of one parent ppt but a mixture
of the cytoplasic organelles of both parents. The production of cybrids is an important
tech. in breeding programmes where CMS is desirable, because the CMS trait is
inheritted through mitochondria. Whereas, the heterokaryons is what we need in s.h
experiments, which contains a mixture of cytoplasm and nuclei of both the parent
ppts.
PPTs are aligned in an AC field which is inhomogeneous and of low voltage and
high frequency. The AC causes dielectrophoresis of ppts by inducing a dipole in each
ppt. and masking the net surface charge distribution on membranes.The ppts
undergoing dielectrophoresis are mutually attracted and consequently bind together to
form chains parallel to the field direction.
The electrofusion is composed of a non-electrolyte (usually mannitol) to ensure
appropriate osmolarity and at the same time enable the dielectrophoretic alignment to
occur. Calcium ions at greater than micromolar concentration are required for better
alignment of protoplasts.
The aligned ppts. Are fused by applying a direct current pulse. DC pulse is generally
of high voltage and short duration, which causes a reversable breakdown at the
contact zone of two membranes. Such membrane breakdown occurs at several points
in the contact zone, simultaneously leading to fusion of cell membranes and
subsequent fusion of cell contentsOptimum electrofusion should produce a large
number of viable and binary heterokaryons. Parameters such as voltage, frequency
and duration of AC and DC, ppt density and cell memebrane properties can all affect
the alignment and fusion of protoplasts as well as the viability of fusion products.
For practical breeding purpose, it is necessary to either select hybrid cells immediately
after fusion or inhibit non-hybrid cells with pre- and/ or post-fusion treatments. There
are a no. of factors to be considered:1. There are more no.of hybrid cells among
fusion products, the non-hybrid cells include homokaryons as well as non-fused
parental protoplasts. Unless culture conditions made favorable for the fusant cells,
they will generally be over-grown by the more numerous non-hybrid cells, though
there are some exceptions of hybrid vigor. 2. Cell division from protoplasts requires
high culture density (104 to 106/ml). But the density of hybrid cells in a fusion popn. Is
generally v. low and they are often surrounded by the toxic dead cell debris.3.
Selection at the cell level is far more economical than at plant level.
1. Physical isolation of heterokaryon selection is feasible only if the two ppt popn differe
cosiderably in physical traits. Such as fusion of green leaf ppts with colorless cell
suspension ppts.such heterokaryons can be isolated using a micromanipulator or
hand-helled micropippeter, but being too tedious, such application is not popular
2. Dual fluorescent labeling system
(FDA labelled green florescing protoplasts fused with RIT labelled protoplasts
emitting a red fluorescence
2. Physical separation is automated with Fluorescence-activated cell sorte)Once the
labelled ppts are labelled with different fluorochromes (Carboxyfluorescein and
scopoletin) the FACS is capable of selecting fusant cells that display dual
fluorescence. Major drawback with this tech. is high cost.
2. Genetic or phyiological complementations are highly effective, but the mutants
required are not always available. Metabolic complementation relies on irreversible
inhibitors rather than mutants and is more versatile. The parental ppts are treated
with 2 diff. metabolic inhibitors(one with iodoacetate; the other with Rhodamine 6-
G)Following fusion, metabolic complementation allows hybrids to survive, while non-
fused ppts are died of the irreversible inhibition.
EVER SINCE THE FIRST REPORT ON PROTOPLAST FUSION DERIVED SOMATIC HYBRID
PLANTS OF NICOTIANA GUAUCA +- N. LANGSDORFFII BY CARLSON ET AL. (1972),
SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION HAS OPENED UP SEVERAL POSSIBILITIES FOR THE
PARASEXUAL MANIPULATION OF PLANTS.
 intraspecific ( n tr -sp -s f k) also intraspecies ( n tr -sp sh z, -s z)
 Arising or occurring within a species or between members of the same species.
Interspecific competition, in ecology, is a form of competition in which individuals of
different species vie for the same resource in an ecosystem (e.g. food or living
space). The other form of competition is intraspecific competition, which involves
organisms of the same species. electrolyte /elec·tro·lyte/ (e-lek´tro-lit) a substance
that dissociates into ions when fused or in solution, thus becoming capable of
conducting electricity electrolyte
 a chemical substance which, when dissolved in water or melted, dissociates into
electrically charged particles (ions), and thus is capable of conducting an electric
current. The principal positively charged ions in the body fluids (cations) are sodium
(Na+), potassium (K+), calcium (Ca2+), and magnesium (Mg2+). The most important
negatively charged ions (anions) are chloride (Cl-), bicarbonate (HCO3-), and
phosphate (PO43-). These electrolytes are involved in metabolic activities and are
essential to the normal function of all cells. Concentration gradients of sodium and
potassium across the cell membrane produce the membrane potential and provide
the means by which electrochemical impulses are transmitted in nerve and muscle
fibers.
 The concentration of the various electrolytes in body fluids is maintained within a
narrow range. However, the optimal concentrations differ in the extracellular fluid and
intracellular fluid. An electrolyte imbalance exists when the serum concentration of an
electrolyte is either too high or too low.
 Stability of the electrolyte balance depends on adequate intake of water and the
electrolytes, and on homeostatic mechanisms within the body that regulate the
absorption, distribution and excretion of water and its dissolved particles.
 The effects of an electrolyte imbalance are not isolated to a particular organ or
system. In general, however, imbalances in calcium concentrations affect the bones,
kidney and gastrointestinal tract. Calcium also influences the permeability of cell
membranes and thereby regulates neuromuscular activity. sodium affects the
osmolality of blood and therefore influences blood volume and pressure and the
retention or loss of interstitial fluid. potassium affects muscular activities, notably
those of the heart, intestines and respiratory tract, and also affects neural stimulation
of the skeletal muscles.

More Related Content

Similar to citrus SH presentation.ppt

The Importance Of Agriculture In Schools
The Importance Of Agriculture In SchoolsThe Importance Of Agriculture In Schools
The Importance Of Agriculture In Schools
Jessica Cannella
 
Tissueculture copy-150516181545-lva1-app6891
Tissueculture copy-150516181545-lva1-app6891Tissueculture copy-150516181545-lva1-app6891
Tissueculture copy-150516181545-lva1-app6891
Rajesh Kumar
 
New concepts in maintenance of plant breeding promises and prospects
New concepts in maintenance of plant breeding promises and prospectsNew concepts in maintenance of plant breeding promises and prospects
New concepts in maintenance of plant breeding promises and prospects
Zuby Gohar Ansari
 
Dissertation Jessica Denning 25300792
Dissertation Jessica Denning 25300792Dissertation Jessica Denning 25300792
Dissertation Jessica Denning 25300792
Jessica Denning
 

Similar to citrus SH presentation.ppt (20)

The Importance Of Agriculture In Schools
The Importance Of Agriculture In SchoolsThe Importance Of Agriculture In Schools
The Importance Of Agriculture In Schools
 
Role of biotechnology in enhancing fruit crop production and quality
Role of biotechnology in enhancing fruit crop production and qualityRole of biotechnology in enhancing fruit crop production and quality
Role of biotechnology in enhancing fruit crop production and quality
 
Anther culture and somatic hybridization
Anther culture and somatic hybridizationAnther culture and somatic hybridization
Anther culture and somatic hybridization
 
Genetically modified Organisms and Foods
Genetically modified Organisms and FoodsGenetically modified Organisms and Foods
Genetically modified Organisms and Foods
 
Tomato
TomatoTomato
Tomato
 
potato, caulilflower and cabbage breeding .pptx
potato, caulilflower and cabbage breeding .pptxpotato, caulilflower and cabbage breeding .pptx
potato, caulilflower and cabbage breeding .pptx
 
BT for genetic enhancement of Hort Crps
BT for genetic enhancement of Hort CrpsBT for genetic enhancement of Hort Crps
BT for genetic enhancement of Hort Crps
 
1. breeding of tomato
1. breeding of tomato1. breeding of tomato
1. breeding of tomato
 
Tissue culture
Tissue culture  Tissue culture
Tissue culture
 
Tissueculture copy-150516181545-lva1-app6891
Tissueculture copy-150516181545-lva1-app6891Tissueculture copy-150516181545-lva1-app6891
Tissueculture copy-150516181545-lva1-app6891
 
Plant breedin
Plant  breedinPlant  breedin
Plant breedin
 
somatic hybrid.pptx
somatic hybrid.pptxsomatic hybrid.pptx
somatic hybrid.pptx
 
Anther culture & its importance in vegetable crops
Anther culture & its importance in vegetable cropsAnther culture & its importance in vegetable crops
Anther culture & its importance in vegetable crops
 
Double haploid production
Double haploid production Double haploid production
Double haploid production
 
New concepts in maintenance of plant breeding promises and prospects
New concepts in maintenance of plant breeding promises and prospectsNew concepts in maintenance of plant breeding promises and prospects
New concepts in maintenance of plant breeding promises and prospects
 
Dissertation Jessica Denning 25300792
Dissertation Jessica Denning 25300792Dissertation Jessica Denning 25300792
Dissertation Jessica Denning 25300792
 
Tissue culture
Tissue cultureTissue culture
Tissue culture
 
Somatic hybridisation
Somatic hybridisationSomatic hybridisation
Somatic hybridisation
 
cisgenesis and intragenesis by Saurabh
cisgenesis and intragenesis by Saurabhcisgenesis and intragenesis by Saurabh
cisgenesis and intragenesis by Saurabh
 
Somaclonal variation ppt, gametoclonal, plant tissue culture, plant biotechno...
Somaclonal variation ppt, gametoclonal, plant tissue culture, plant biotechno...Somaclonal variation ppt, gametoclonal, plant tissue culture, plant biotechno...
Somaclonal variation ppt, gametoclonal, plant tissue culture, plant biotechno...
 

More from sanarao25

Data Retreival, Protein sequence database, Gene Pridiction 3.pptx
Data Retreival, Protein sequence database, Gene Pridiction 3.pptxData Retreival, Protein sequence database, Gene Pridiction 3.pptx
Data Retreival, Protein sequence database, Gene Pridiction 3.pptx
sanarao25
 

More from sanarao25 (18)

Lecture Environmental Biotechnology, Bioremediation 24-12-2019.ppt
Lecture Environmental Biotechnology, Bioremediation 24-12-2019.pptLecture Environmental Biotechnology, Bioremediation 24-12-2019.ppt
Lecture Environmental Biotechnology, Bioremediation 24-12-2019.ppt
 
Parasitic diseases.pptx
Parasitic diseases.pptxParasitic diseases.pptx
Parasitic diseases.pptx
 
Prenylation.pptx
Prenylation.pptxPrenylation.pptx
Prenylation.pptx
 
Prenylation.pptx
Prenylation.pptxPrenylation.pptx
Prenylation.pptx
 
Microarray data Analysis.pptx
Microarray data Analysis.pptxMicroarray data Analysis.pptx
Microarray data Analysis.pptx
 
Data Retreival, Protein sequence database, Gene Pridiction 3.pptx
Data Retreival, Protein sequence database, Gene Pridiction 3.pptxData Retreival, Protein sequence database, Gene Pridiction 3.pptx
Data Retreival, Protein sequence database, Gene Pridiction 3.pptx
 
COPI and COPII Secretery pathways.pptx
COPI and COPII Secretery pathways.pptxCOPI and COPII Secretery pathways.pptx
COPI and COPII Secretery pathways.pptx
 
Molecular markers.ppt
Molecular markers.pptMolecular markers.ppt
Molecular markers.ppt
 
An efficient cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.pdf
An efficient cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.pdfAn efficient cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.pdf
An efficient cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.pdf
 
L 7 Plant protoplasts .ppt
L 7 Plant  protoplasts .pptL 7 Plant  protoplasts .ppt
L 7 Plant protoplasts .ppt
 
17465299.ppt
17465299.ppt17465299.ppt
17465299.ppt
 
GAMETOGENESIS.pptx
GAMETOGENESIS.pptxGAMETOGENESIS.pptx
GAMETOGENESIS.pptx
 
23_clark_missing_epistasis.pptx
23_clark_missing_epistasis.pptx23_clark_missing_epistasis.pptx
23_clark_missing_epistasis.pptx
 
Cell and Cell division.pptx
Cell and Cell division.pptxCell and Cell division.pptx
Cell and Cell division.pptx
 
Cell and Cell division.pptx
Cell and Cell division.pptxCell and Cell division.pptx
Cell and Cell division.pptx
 
Presentation1.pptx
Presentation1.pptxPresentation1.pptx
Presentation1.pptx
 
mitosis and meiosis 02152018.pptx
mitosis and meiosis 02152018.pptxmitosis and meiosis 02152018.pptx
mitosis and meiosis 02152018.pptx
 
mitosis and meiosis 02152018.pptx
mitosis and meiosis 02152018.pptxmitosis and meiosis 02152018.pptx
mitosis and meiosis 02152018.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

Discovery of an Accretion Streamer and a Slow Wide-angle Outflow around FUOri...
Discovery of an Accretion Streamer and a Slow Wide-angle Outflow around FUOri...Discovery of an Accretion Streamer and a Slow Wide-angle Outflow around FUOri...
Discovery of an Accretion Streamer and a Slow Wide-angle Outflow around FUOri...
Sérgio Sacani
 
GUIDELINES ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICS Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authori...
GUIDELINES ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICS Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authori...GUIDELINES ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICS Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authori...
GUIDELINES ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICS Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authori...
Lokesh Kothari
 
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 bAsymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Sérgio Sacani
 
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
PirithiRaju
 
Bacterial Identification and Classifications
Bacterial Identification and ClassificationsBacterial Identification and Classifications
Bacterial Identification and Classifications
Areesha Ahmad
 
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptxPresentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
gindu3009
 
Seismic Method Estimate velocity from seismic data.pptx
Seismic Method Estimate velocity from seismic  data.pptxSeismic Method Estimate velocity from seismic  data.pptx
Seismic Method Estimate velocity from seismic data.pptx
AlMamun560346
 
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune WaterworldsBiogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Sérgio Sacani
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
RohitNehra6
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Botany 4th semester file By Sumit Kumar yadav.pdf
Botany 4th semester file By Sumit Kumar yadav.pdfBotany 4th semester file By Sumit Kumar yadav.pdf
Botany 4th semester file By Sumit Kumar yadav.pdf
 
Discovery of an Accretion Streamer and a Slow Wide-angle Outflow around FUOri...
Discovery of an Accretion Streamer and a Slow Wide-angle Outflow around FUOri...Discovery of an Accretion Streamer and a Slow Wide-angle Outflow around FUOri...
Discovery of an Accretion Streamer and a Slow Wide-angle Outflow around FUOri...
 
Kochi ❤CALL GIRL 84099*07087 ❤CALL GIRLS IN Kochi ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRL
Kochi ❤CALL GIRL 84099*07087 ❤CALL GIRLS IN Kochi ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRLKochi ❤CALL GIRL 84099*07087 ❤CALL GIRLS IN Kochi ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRL
Kochi ❤CALL GIRL 84099*07087 ❤CALL GIRLS IN Kochi ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRL
 
GUIDELINES ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICS Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authori...
GUIDELINES ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICS Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authori...GUIDELINES ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICS Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authori...
GUIDELINES ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICS Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authori...
 
Biological Classification BioHack (3).pdf
Biological Classification BioHack (3).pdfBiological Classification BioHack (3).pdf
Biological Classification BioHack (3).pdf
 
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 bAsymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
 
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Borer_Pests_Binomics_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...
TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...
TEST BANK For Radiologic Science for Technologists, 12th Edition by Stewart C...
 
Bacterial Identification and Classifications
Bacterial Identification and ClassificationsBacterial Identification and Classifications
Bacterial Identification and Classifications
 
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
 
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptxPresentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
Presentation Vikram Lander by Vedansh Gupta.pptx
 
Seismic Method Estimate velocity from seismic data.pptx
Seismic Method Estimate velocity from seismic  data.pptxSeismic Method Estimate velocity from seismic  data.pptx
Seismic Method Estimate velocity from seismic data.pptx
 
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune WaterworldsBiogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
 
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
 
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdfChemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
 
COST ESTIMATION FOR A RESEARCH PROJECT.pptx
COST ESTIMATION FOR A RESEARCH PROJECT.pptxCOST ESTIMATION FOR A RESEARCH PROJECT.pptx
COST ESTIMATION FOR A RESEARCH PROJECT.pptx
 
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdfBotany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
 
All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office U.S. Department of Defense (U) Case: “Eg...
All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office U.S. Department of Defense (U) Case: “Eg...All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office U.S. Department of Defense (U) Case: “Eg...
All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office U.S. Department of Defense (U) Case: “Eg...
 
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​
 

citrus SH presentation.ppt

  • 1. Somatic hybridization: a base line for crop improvement
  • 2. John P. Helgeson USDA/ARS, Dept of Plant Pathology University of Wisconsin - Madison Protoplast Preparation and Somatic Hybrids
  • 3. • In many cases the somatic hybrids can be crossed back to one or the other of the two parents. • In that way the DNA of a wild species can be incorporated into a breeding line of a crop species. • Our work has been done primarily with potato and its wild relatives. Somatic Hybridization
  • 4. Using somatic hybrids to introgress important genes into potato
  • 5. Potato plants growing in a test tube Somatic Hybridization
  • 6. Potato leaves suspended in wall-dissolving enzyme solution
  • 7. Protoplasts collected in a Babcock bottle Somatic Hybridization
  • 8. Protoplasts float to top in sugar solution Somatic Hybridization
  • 9. Potato leaf protoplasts immediately after digestion of cell walls
  • 10. Close up of protoplasts - green discs are chloroplasts
  • 11. Two potato leaf protoplasts about to fuse
  • 12. Fusion products begin to divide on nutrient medium
  • 13. Further cell divisions yield masses of cells called “Calli.”
  • 14. The calli turn green in light
  • 15. If the conditions are right, small shoots emerge from the green calli
  • 16. The shoots on calli will develop into new plants
  • 18. • The shoots can be excised from the calli and rooted on nutrient media in a test tube. This will result in a whole new potato plant. • The new potato plant can be grown in a test tube Somatic Hybridization
  • 19. A form of DNA fingerprinting called RFLP analysis can be used to demonstrate that one really does have a somatic hybrid. Note that the somatic hybrids have the DNA bands from S. bulbocastanum and potato PI203900, the parents of the hybrids.
  • 20. • Characteristics of both of the combined species can be expressed in the somatic hybrids. • Note the purple stems vs the green stems and compound vs simple leaves stems in the following slide Somatic Hybridization
  • 23. We have been using this procedure to capture disease resistances from wild potato species that can’t be crossed with the domestic potato Somatic Hybridization
  • 24. Somatic hybrids obtained in the Helgeson Lab S. brevidens PL 218228 (2x) + S. tuberosum (4x) S. brevidens PL 218228 (2x) + Russet Burbank (4x) S. brevidens PL 218228 (2x) + S. tuberosum (2x) S. bulbocastanumPL 245763 (2x) + S. tuberosum (4x) S. bulbocastanumPL 245310 (2x) + S. tuberosum (4x) S. cardiophyllum PL 279272 (2x) + S. brevidens (2x) S. commersonii PL 320266 (2x) + S. tuberosum (4x) S. commersonii PL 320266 (2x) + S. tuberosum (2x) S. etuberosum PL 245939 (2x) + S. tuberosum
  • 25. Some new disease resistances from somatic hybrids Disease/pathogen Somatic hybrid Late blight Early blight M. Chitwoodii Erwinia Soft rot Bacterial wilt PVY PLRV S. bulbocastanum + S. tuberosum S. bulbocastanum + S. tuberosum S. bulbocastanum + S. tuberosum S. brevidens + S. tuberosum S. commersonii + S. tuberosum S. etuberosum + S. tuberosum S. brevidens + S. tuberosum
  • 26. We have been able to capture late blight resistance from the wild potato species, Solanum bulbocastanum and, using sexual crosses of the somatic hybrid we have developed a number of highly resistant potato breeding lines. Somatic Hybridization
  • 27. Tubers of Solanum bulbocastanum, source of the “RB” gene
  • 28. S. bulbcastanum in the field at Hancock, Wisconsin
  • 29. View of test field - Hancock Research Station. The green plants are those with the new resistance gene
  • 30. Backcross 1 line (J101- K27) in field at Hancock, WI The field received no fungicide and the dead plants are from the cultivar Russet Burbank, killed by late blight.
  • 31. BC1 line J138A12 in Toluca, Mexico. The arrow points to what is left of a plant of the susceptible cultivar “Alpha.” The resistance to late blight is effective in Toluca Mexico, where the variation in the late blight organisms is the greatest in the world.
  • 32. By somatic hybridizations such as those of potato and S. bulbocastanum we hope to introduce new genes into potato so that pesticide use can be decreased substantially. For more information contact John Helgeson, JPH@plantpath.wisc.edu Protoplast Preparation and Somatic Hybrids
  • 33. SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION Involves fusion of two distantly related, to closely related plant protoplasts at intraspecific, interspecific, intergeneric, and interfamily levels, with subsequent regeneration of hybrid cells into hybrid plants.
  • 34. SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION BASICS 1. In vitro culture 2. Protoplast isolation and purification 3. Protoplast fusion 4. Growth and selection of somatic hybrid tissues 5. Confirmation of hybridity 6. Exploitation of S.H.
  • 35. 2. PROTOPLAST ISOLATION  Protoplast:  Bacterial, fungal or plant cell deprived of its rigid wall but with its plasma membrane intact  Procedure for protoplast isolation 1. Mechanical production (Klercker, 1892) 2. Enzymatic digestion (EC Cocking, 1960)
  • 36.
  • 37. 3. METHODS OF PPT. FUSION  Spontaneous  Mechanical  Induced Polyethylene glycol (PEG) Electrofusion
  • 38.
  • 39. ELECTROFUSION  A two-stage process: 1. A non-uniform AC field stimulates close protoplast plasmamembrane contact 1. Short pulse of DC stimulates breakdown of closely aligned plasma membranes producing pores through which cytoplasm of adjacent ppts. flows and causes fusion
  • 41. PROTOPLAST FUSION PRODUCTS Bi-nucleate HETEROKARYON LOSS OF ONE NUCLEUS NUCLEAR FUSION CYTOPLASMIC HYBRIDS (CYBRIDS) Somatic hybrid
  • 42. 4. SELECTION OF SOMATIC HYBRIDS 1. Manual selection Physical isolation of the hybrid (using physical differentiation like pigmentation orregenerability) 2. Dual fluorescent labeling system (FDA labelled green florescing protoplasts fused with RIT labelled protoplasts emitting a red fluorescence 3. Complementation Procedures inhibiting growth of homokaryons 4. FACS physical sorting of heterokaryons
  • 43. 5. CONFIRMATION OF HYBRIDITY  Morphological  Cytological  Chromosome counting  Flow cytometry  Molecular techniques
  • 44. BENEFITS OF SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION  SHs are not GMOs  Elimination of crossing barriers  Specific addition of the genomes of two plants  Unique combinations of nuclear and organellar genomes generate novel germplasm  No strict maternal inheritance of organelles
  • 45. LIMITATIONS OF SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION  a) Somatic hybridization does not always produce plants that give fertile and viable seeds. b) Tedious selection procedures c) After confirmation, hybrid material is field evaluated to check stable integration of desired character d) Protoclonal variations, chromosomal elimination, organelle segregation etc. all lead to variable somatic hybrids
  • 46. Applications of Somatic Hybridization and Cybridization in Scion and Rootstock Improvement with Focus on Citrus
  • 47. CITRUS CULTIVAR IMPROVEMENT Ineffective results of conventional breeding owing to:  High heterozygosity  Pollen and ovule sterility  Sexual incompatibility  Nucellar polyembryony  Juvenility
  • 48.
  • 49. Citrus Scion improvement objectives: Seedlessness Fruit quality traits Root Stocks: Better adaptability to biotic/ abiotic stresses Tree size control
  • 50. Scion Improvement Triploid production: 1.By crossing 4X SH with 2X parent  creation of allotetraploid SH (2X + 2X= 4X)  4X SH are then used in interploidal crosses as breeding parents (4X x 2X) = 3X 2.By fusion of diploid and haploid parents creation of triploid SH (2X + 1X) 3. Cybridization  creation of cybrids to transfer Satsuma CMS cytoplasm to seedy cultivars
  • 51. Rootstock Improvement - somatic hybridization of complementary parents building a better sour orange -Production of Tetrazygs – fusion of selected mandarin + pummelo parents
  • 52.
  • 56. SWEET ORANGE SUSPENSION CULTURE PROTOPLASTS
  • 58. TYPICAL SUSPENSION PROTOPLAST + LEAF PROTOPLAST PEG-INDUCED FUSION
  • 59. Fusion products culture and regeneration
  • 60.
  • 61.
  • 62. Ploidy Analysis Showing Diploid and Tetraploid Peaks Using a Partec Tabletop Flow Cytometer
  • 64.
  • 65. NOVA + SUCCARI SOMATIC HYBRID TREE
  • 66. ‘Tacle’ – a seedless triploid mandarin hybrid produced by A. Starrantino.
  • 67. Somatic Hybrid Pollen Parents Used For Mandarin Citrus Fruit Improvement at CREC: 1. Nova mandarin + Succari sweet orange 2. Valencia sweet orange + Murcott tangor 3. Succari sweet orange + Murcott tangor 4. Rohde Red Valencia + Dancy mandarin 5. Succari + Page tangelo 6. Valencia + Page tangelo 7. Succari + Minneola tangelo 8. Hamlin sweet orange + Ponkan mandarin 9. Hamlin + LB8-4 (Clementine x Minneola) 10.Valencia + (Robinson x Temple) 11.Pink Marsh grapefruit + Murcott 12.Succari + Dancy 13. Murcott + LB8-9 tangelo 14. Nova + Osceola mandarin
  • 68. Interploid hybridization using tetraploid somatic hybrids as pollen parents to produce seedless triploids for mandarin improvement: - more than 12000 triploids using pollen from somatic hybrids (under direction of FG Gmitter,CREC) - oldest hybrids are now fruiting and most are seedless!!!!!
  • 69. NOVA + SUCCARI SOMATIC HYBRID FRUIT (father of several hundred triploid progeny)
  • 70. VALENCIA + (ROBINSON X TEMPLE) HARVESTED JANUARY 22,2004 BRIX=11.4, ACID=0.57, RATIO=20 3 SEEDS/FRUIT
  • 71. ROHDE RED VALENCIA + DANCY HARVESTED JANUARY 28,2004 BRIX=11.4, ACID=1.57, RATIO= 7.26 3 SEEDS/FRUIT
  • 72. NOVA + OSCEOLA HARVESTED DECEMBER 6, 2005 BRIX= 14.8, ACID=1.15, RATIO= 12.9
  • 73. New triploid mandarin hybrids following embryo rescue and micro-grafting (F.G. Gmitter, Jr.)
  • 74.
  • 75. Seedless fresh fruit varieties at the Tetraploid level? Seedless somatic hybrids with excellent fruit quality: 1. Succari sweet orange + Page tangelo - peelable, early maturing, excellent flavor 2. Valencia sweet orange + Murcott tangor - peelable, excellent flavor
  • 76. Succari + Page fruits taken on Sep 27, 2002 (seedless)
  • 77. Valencia + Murcott, fruits taken on Jan 15, 2003 (nearly seedless)
  • 78. PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF CYBRIDIZATION: Transfer of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) from the seedless Satsuma mandarin to other superior seedy diploid commercial cultivars via symmetric fusion. Objective: remove seed from successful cultivars without otherwise altering cultivar integrity. Cybrid combinations produced to date (Grosser, Guo, Prasad and Deng): 1. Guoqing Satsuma + Hirado Buntan pink pummelo 2. Guoqing Satsuma + Sunburst mandarin 3. Guoqing Satsuma + (Clementine x Murcott) Lee hybrid 4. Guoqing Satsuma + LB8-9 (Clementine x Minneola)
  • 79. Somatic cybrid plant of Hirado Buntan pink pummelo containing Guoqing Satsuma cytoplasm (mitochondrial genome).
  • 80. Somatic cybrid plant of Sunburst tangerine containing Guoqing Satsuma cytoplasm (mitochondrial genome).
  • 81. Somatic cybrid plant of Lee hybrid (Murcott x Clementine) containing Guoqing Satsuma cytoplasm (mitochondrial genome).
  • 83. WHAT DO WE NEED? - Objectives - Wide adaptability, tolerance of high pH, calcareous and heavy soils - Resistance to CTV-induced quick decline - Resistance to Citrus Blight - High yields of good fruit quality - Optimum tree size for harvesting - New rootstocks must be able to tolerate mechanical damage inflicted by Diaprepes larvae, and resist secondary infections of Phytophthora nicotianae and P. palmivora, and other invading fungi - Must be capable of vigorous root growth following Diaprepes damage. - tolerance of salinity in some areas
  • 84.
  • 85. SOMATIC HYBRID BREEDING PARENTS BEING USED FOR ROOTSTOCKS IMPOVEMENT: Females (produce high % of zygotic seed): 1.Nova mandarin + Hirado Buntan sdl. pummelo 2.Sour orange + rangpur 3.Succari sweet orange + Hirado Buntan sdl. pummelo Pollen Parents: 1.Cleopatra + Argentine trifoliate orange 2.Cleopatra + Swingle citrumelo 3.Sour orange + Carrizo 4.Red Marsh grapefruit + Argentine trifoliate orange 5.Cleopatra + Sour orange 6.Sour orange + Palestine sweet lime 7.Sour orange + Flying dragon trifoliate orange 8.Cleopatra + rangpur (for salinity tolerance) 9.Succari sweet orange + Argentine trifoliate orange 10.Nova mandarin + C. ichangensis 11.Hamlin sweet orange + Microcitrus papuana
  • 86. NEW STRATEGY: BREEDING SOMATIC HYBRID ROOTSTOCKS AT THE TETRAPLOID LEVEL – CREATION OF ‘TETRAZYGS’ -Use of allotetraploid somatic hybrid breeding parents allows the mixing of genes from 3-4 diploid rootstocks at once. -Progeny can be screened at the seed/seedling level for wide soil adaptability and Phytophthora resistance. -Products can have direct rootstock potential including adequate polylembryony, ability to control tree size due to polyploidy, and improved disease resistance.
  • 87. Selection of progeny from crosses designed for salinity tolerance: healthy seedlings from Nova + HBpummelo with Cleo + rangpur
  • 88. Selection of progeny from crosses designed for salinity tolerance: healthy seedlings from Nova + HBpummelo with Cleo + rangpur Salinity Tolerance
  • 90. (Nova + HBPummelo) x (Cleo + Arg. Trifoliate orange) “TETRAZYGS”
  • 91. Tetrazyg nucellar liners prior to budding at commercial nursery
  • 92. 5 year old Valencia on Orange#14, between two rough lemon trees planted at the same time – blight resets in Alligator grove (Mr. Lee)
  • 93. HLB tolerance from new rootstocks? Vernia/Orange #4 Vernia/Orange #19 New photos New photos of trees PCR+ since last September – St. Helena
  • 94. Rootstock improvements regarding HLB are like likely to come in stages: First stage: Rootstocks that reduce the frequency of HLB infection, and reduce the severity of the disease once infected – these will still require efficient psyllid control and optimized production systems. Second stage: Potential rootstock mitigation of the disease – research is underway to possibly identify rootstocks that can protect the entire tree – regardless of the scion. Psyllid control may not be necessary. No horticultural performance data would be available on such selections initially, but the hybrids would have good rootstock pedigree.
  • 95. Concluding Remarks: 1.Tolerance/resistance to canker and HLB is being discovered in commercial quality CREC scion and rootstock germplasm – making these epidemics a mixed blessing for our breeding program. 2. Successful rootstocks should be tolerant/resistant to all known vascular diseases of citrus including CTV-quick decline and blight (is there a blight/HLB synergy, the double whammy??). Commercial rootstocks are lacking in this regard – especially Swingle and Carrizo! 3.Management programs should minimize any stress on the trees, including nutritional or water stresses; and provide constant nutrition. Don’t forget about ground fertilizer applications! 4.New rootstock candidates are showing a lower frequency of HLB infection, and reduced severity of disease symptoms once trees become infected. Tolerant rootstock types being identified include complex tetrazygs, citranges, citrandarins, and sour orange types. 5.Complex new rootstocks in combination with the right tree care and good psyllid control have potential to prevent and/or mitigate HLB. Imagine the potential of ACPS when combined with the use of HLB-tolerant, tree-size controlling precocious rootstocks! 6.Differences observed in HLB responses among unselected new rootstock candidates suggest great potential for the selection of rootstock genotypes that can completely protect trees – a solution for all commercial scions. Stay tuned for the second wave of new rootstocks! THERE IS HOPE!
  • 96. CITRUS BLIGHT -still a major killer of trees in Florida -if you solve the sour orange problem, you solve blight! -trifoliate orange hybrids susceptible – strategy is to dilute trifoliate contribution while retaining disease resistance and fruit quality attributes -field screening of new hybrids by resetting in blight holes– Primary cooperator is Mr. Orie Lee, Secondary cooperator David and Sharon Garrett. -build in tree size control along with the CTV resistance NEW STRATEGY FOR BUILDING A BETTER SOUR ORANGE -Somatic Hybridization of Superior Pummelo + Mandarin parents. - All pummelos are not created equal. We have developed an effective greenhouse screen for selecting zygotic pummelo seedlings adapted to high pH, calcareous soils, and that are resistant to both Phytophthora nicotianae and P. palmivora. A trememdous amount of genetic diversity can be quickly screened. Superior individuals will serve as fusion partners with selected mandarins including widely adapted Shekwasha and C. amblycarpa. Resulting somatic hybrids should have tremendous rootstock potential.
  • 97.
  • 98. SOMATIC HYBRID ROOTSTOCKS – TREE SIZE CONTROL McTeer Sandridge Trial – Planted 1995 - Data from 2003 harvest Rootstock boxes/tree S.S./box Avg. Diam. Yield Eff. Kg/m3 SO + FD 2.64 6.73 3.2 0.46 FD 2.0 5.74 3.1 0.36 Succ + APT 3.17 6.52 3.5 0.45 Cleo + APT 3.67 6.21 3.7 0.40 SO + rangpur 4.11 6.10 3.8 0.40 Swingle 4.89 5.70 4.0 0.37 SO + CZO 4.89 6.10 4.1 0.36 Cleo 5.71 6.16 4.4 0.36 Palestine SL 7.0 5.32 4.8 0.29
  • 99. EFFECT OF POLYPLOIDY ON TREE SIZE (BASED ON % OF CARRIZO AVERAGE CANOPY VOLUME) – SWEET ORANGE SCION, MCTEER TRIAL, DUNDEE, SOMATIC HYBRIDS INDICATED BY PLUS SIGN. TREES 4-7 YEARS OLD. Rough lemon 8166 141 CARRIZO 100 Cleo 100 Kinkoji 95 C-35 90 Sour orange + Carrizo 84 Swingle 78 Sour orange + rangpur 65 WGFT+50-7 63* Cleo + Carrizo 61 Cleo + Argentine trifoliate orange 58 Nova + Hirado Buntan pummelo zyg. 56 Cleo + rangpur 54 SO+50-7 51* Nova + Palestine sweet lime 49 Milam + Kinkoji 42 Changsha + Benton 38 Cleo + Swingle 35 Cleo + Flying Dragon 35 Hamlin + Flying Dragon 34 Flying Dragon 33 Sour orange + Benton 29
  • 100. Overview of somatic hybrid seedlings at Reed Brothers Nursery - thanks to Chuck Reed and Mike Baker
  • 101. Test for CTV-induced quick-decline: selected pummelo seedlings are budded with MCA-13-CTV positive sweet orange. After 2+ years in the field, 20 best identified.
  • 102. NEW MANDARIN + PUMMELO SOMATIC HYBRIDS PRODUCED DURING 2006. W. Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-3 W. Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-7 W. Murcott + HBP sdl JL-12 W. Murcott + Large Pink sdl 7-2-99-2 W. Murcott + Sha Tian You sdl 4-3-99-2 W. Murcott + HBP sdl 5-1-99-2 Nova + Large Pink sdl 7-2-99-2 Nova + Pummelo 8-2-99-1 Nova + Siamese sweet sdl 7-3-99-1 Nova + Ling Ping Yau sdl 8-1-99-4B Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-5 red = pummelo parent tolerant of CTV- induced quick-decline after 2 years in field
  • 103. Vigorous new mandarin + pummelo somatic hybrid: Amblycarpa + Hirado buntan sdl. 5-1-99-1B
  • 104. Field Assay for Tristeza Virus Resistance – Sour orange not growing, Mandarin + Pummelo somatic hybrid not affected by virus! Sour orange
  • 105. Amenability to Traditional Seed Propagation – 2006 Tree Size Controlling Somatic Hybrids Hybrid Seeds per Fruit Seed Type WGFT + 50-7 20 Nucellar Changsha + 50-7 17 Nucellar SO + 50-7 14 Nucellar SO+Carrizo 13 Nucellar Data: Julie Gmitter and Chunxian Chen
  • 107.
  • 108. WHAT DO WE NEED? - Wide adaptability, tolerance of high pH, calcareous and heavy soils - Resistance to CTV-induced quick decline - Resistance to Citrus Blight - High yields of good fruit quality - Optimum tree size for harvesting - New rootstocks must be able to tolerate mechanical damage inflicted by Diaprepes larvae, and resist secondary infections of Phytophthora nicotianae and P. palmivora, and other invading fungi - Must be capable of vigorous root growth following Diaprepes damage. - tolerance of salinity in some areas
  • 109. Our primary strategy for rootstock improvement has been to produce allotetraploid somatic hybrids by combining complementary diploid rootstocks. Tetraploid rootstocks usually (but not always) have a built in tree-size control mechanism due to some unknown physiological reaction with the diploid scion.
  • 110.
  • 111. SOMATIC HYBRID ROOTSTOCKS – TREE SIZE CONTROL McTeer Sandridge Trial – Planted 1995 - Data from 2003 harvest Rootstock boxes/tree S.S./box Avg. Diam. Yield Eff. Kg/m3 SO + FD 2.64 6.73 3.2 0.46 FD 2.0 5.74 3.1 0.36 Succ + APT 3.17 6.52 3.5 0.45 Cleo + APT 3.67 6.21 3.7 0.40 SO + rangpur 4.11 6.10 3.8 0.40 Swingle 4.89 5.70 4.0 0.37 SO + CZO 4.89 6.10 4.1 0.36 Cleo 5.71 6.16 4.4 0.36 Palestine SL 7.0 5.32 4.8 0.29
  • 112. EFFECT OF POLYPLOIDY ON TREE SIZE (BASED ON % OF CARRIZO AVERAGE CANOPY VOLUME) – SWEET ORANGE SCION, MCTEER TRIAL, DUNDEE, SOMATIC HYBRIDS INDICATED BY PLUS SIGN. TREES 4-7 YEARS OLD. Rough lemon 8166 141 CARRIZO 100 Cleo 100 Kinkoji 95 C-35 90 Sour orange + Carrizo 84 Swingle 78 Sour orange + rangpur 65 WGFT+50-7 63* Cleo + Carrizo 61 Cleo + Argentine trifoliate orange 58 Nova + Hirado Buntan pummelo zyg. 56 Cleo + rangpur 54 SO+50-7 51* Nova + Palestine sweet lime 49 Milam + Kinkoji 42 Changsha + Benton 38 Cleo + Swingle 35 Cleo + Flying Dragon 35 Hamlin + Flying Dragon 34 Flying Dragon 33 Sour orange + Benton 29
  • 113. Overview of somatic hybrid seedlings at Reed Brothers Nursery - thanks to Chuck Reed and Mike Baker
  • 114. OTHER NEW SOMATIC HYBRID ROOTSTOCKS PRODUCED RECENTLY: Milam + Kinjoji Changsha + 50-7 trifoliate orange White grapefruit + 50-7 trifoliate orange Sour orange + 50-7 trifoliate orange Sour orange + Benton citrange Amblycarpa + Carrizo citrange Amblycarpa + C-35 citrange Amblycarpa + Benton citrange Amblycarpa + Volk Amblycarpa + Flying Dragon Amblycarpa + Rubidoux trifoliate orange Murcott + Rubidoux trifoliate orange Amblycarpa + 50-7 trifoliate orange
  • 115. SOUR ORANGE ROOTSTOCK - formerly the most important rootstock worldwide - widely adapted to most soil types, tolerant of blight - produces fruit of high quality, holds fruit well -- very nursery friendly - no longer being used due to susceptibility to quick decline disease caused by citrus tristeza virus - introduction of the brown citrus aphid (an efficient tristeza vector) to many areas threatens existing trees - replacement rootstock badly needed!
  • 116. WHAT IS SOUR ORANGE? RAPD Markers Identified in Various Citrus Genotypes For Analysis of Origin (from Nicolosi et al. 2000). Genotype Markers Markers shared with Extra Pumm, Mand, Citron, Sweet, Sour sweet or. 71 35 36 sour or. 84 42 36 6 grapefr. 72 45 27 lemon 78 45 31 2 Volk 56 6 27 22
  • 117. Screening Zygotic Pummelo Seedlings from a superior pummelo seed parent
  • 118. Screening of Open-Pollinated Pummelo Seedlings for Tolerance of Phytophthora and High pH, Calcareous Soil Tree I.D. Pummelo Variety % Seedling Survival DPI 8-1 Liang Ping Yau sdlg. (China) 69% DPI 7-2 Large Pink Pummelo (SE Asia) 67% J.L.C. Hirado Buntan sdlg. (Japan) 56% DPI 5-4 Red Shaddock Pummelo (SE Asia) 47% DPI 4-3 Sha Ten Yau sdlg. (China) 30% DPI 7-3 Siamese Sweet (Thailand) 27% DPI 4-4 Siamese Pummelo (Thailand) 18% DPI 5-1 Hirado Buntan sdlg. (Japan) 17% DP”I 8-2 Pummelo NW (Florida) 12% DPI 7-1 Chinese Pummelo (China) 4% DPI 6-1 Kao Phuang (Thailand) 0% >200 seedlings selected for fusion experiments
  • 119. NEW MANDARIN + PUMMELO SOMATIC HYBRIDS PRODUCED DURING 2000-2003. Murcott + Hirado Buntan pummelo (HBP) Murcott + HBP sdl-JL1 Murcott + Chandler sdl-80 Murcott + Siamese Pummelo sdl 4-4-99-6 Murcott + Chandler sdl-11-A1 (best in Diaprepes test) Amblycarpa + HBP Amblycarpa + Chandler pummelo Amblycarpa + Chandler sdl-69 Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-5-1-99-1B Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL2B Amblycarpa + LingPingYau-sdl-8-1-99-4A Amblycarpa + Large Pink Pummelo sdl-7-2-99-5 Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL1 Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL4 Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-5-1-99-3 Shekwasha + HBP Shekwasha + Chandler Shekwasha + HBP sdl-JL2B
  • 120. Test for CTV-induced quick-decline: selected pummelo seedlings are budded with MCA-13-CTV positive sweet orange. After 2+ years in the field, 20 best identified.
  • 121. NEW MANDARIN + PUMMELO SOMATIC HYBRIDS PRODUCED DURING 2004-2006. Amblycarpa + Siamese Pummelo sdl 4-4-99-6 Amblycarpa + Siamese Sweet sdl. 7-3-99-1 Amblycarpa + Shao Tian You sdl. 4-3-99-2 Amblycarpa + Hirado Buntan Pink (HBP) sdl. JL-3 Amblycarpa + HBP sdl. JL-5 Amblycarpa + HBP sdl. JL-7 Amblycarpa + HBP sdl JL-12 Amblycarpa + HBP sdl 5-1-99-2 Amblycarpa + HBP sdl. MG-10 Amblycarpa + Chandler sdl-11-A1 (best in Diaprepes test) Changsha + HBP sdl. JL-3 Changsha + HBP sdl. JL-5 Changsha + HBP sdl. JL-7 Page + HBP sdl. JL-3 Page + HBP sdl. JL-4 Page + HBP sdl. JL-5 red = pummelo parent tolerant of CTV- Page + HBP sdl. JL-7 induced quick-decline after 2 years
  • 122. NEW MANDARIN + PUMMELO SOMATIC HYBRIDS PRODUCED DURING 2006. W. Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-3 W. Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-7 W. Murcott + HBP sdl JL-12 W. Murcott + Large Pink sdl 7-2-99-2 W. Murcott + Sha Tian You sdl 4-3-99-2 W. Murcott + HBP sdl 5-1-99-2 Nova + Large Pink sdl 7-2-99-2 Nova + Pummelo 8-2-99-1 Nova + Siamese sweet sdl 7-3-99-1 Nova + Ling Ping Yau sdl 8-1-99-4B Murcott + HBP sdl. JL-5 red = pummelo parent tolerant of CTV- induced quick-decline after 2 years in field
  • 123. Vigorous new mandarin + pummelo somatic hybrid: Amblycarpa + Hirado buntan sdl. 5-1-99-1B
  • 124. Figure.1. Leaf morphology of sour orange and some new somatic hybrids of mandarin + pummelo (‘mandelos’). 1- Sour orange; 2 - Amblycarpa + C. grandis ‘Chandler’; 3 - Amblycarpa + HBP (Hirado Buntan Pummelo); 4 - Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL-2B; 5 - Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-5-1-99-1B; 6 - Amblycarpa + ‘LingPing Yau’-sdl-8-1-99-4A.
  • 125. Gel -1 Primer c-11 Gel -2 Primer c-11 Gel -4 Primer c- 64 Gel -3 Primer c-64 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 RAPD patterns of new mandarin + pummelo interspecific somatic hybrids and their parental genotypes. Gels-1 and 3 are products amplified by operon primers C-11 and C-64 respectively. Lane 1- 1kb marker; 2- Amblycarpa mandarin (C. amblycarpa); 3- Amblycarpa + ‘Siamese’ sdl-4-4-99-6; 4- ‘Siamese’ sdl-4-4-99-6; 5- Amblycarpa + ‘Chandler’ sdl. A1-11; 6- ‘Chandler’ sdl. A1-11; 7- Amblycarpa + ‘Large Pink’ sdl-7-2-99-5; 8- ‘Large Pink’ sdl-7-2-99-5; 9- Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL-4; 10- HBP sdl-JL-4; 11- Amblycarpa. Gels-2 and 4 are products amplified by operon primers C-11 and C-64 respectively. Lane 1- 1kb marker; 2- Amblycarpa mandarin (C. amblycarpa); 3- Amblycarpa + HBP sdl-JL-1; 4- HBP sdl-JL-1; 5-‘Succari’; 6- ‘Succari’ + C.grandis ‘Hirado Buntan Pink’ (HBP); 7- C.grandis ‘Hirado Buntan Pink’ (HBP); 8- ‘Murcott’ tangor; 9-‘Murcott’ + ‘Chandler’ sdl. A1-11; 10- ‘Chandler’ sdl.A1-11; 11- ‘Murcott’ + ‘Siamese’ sdl-4-4-99-6; 12- ‘Siamese’ sdl-4-4-99-6. (White arrows indicate complementary bands from the embryogenic parents and red diamond arrows from the pummelo leaf parents).
  • 126. Field Assay for Tristeza Virus Resistance – Sour orange not growing, Mandarin + Pummelo somatic hybrid not affected by virus! Sour orange
  • 127. Amenability to Traditional Seed Propagation – 2006 Tree Size Controlling Somatic Hybrids Hybrid Seeds per Fruit Seed Type WGFT + 50-7 20 Nucellar Changsha + 50-7 17 Nucellar SO + 50-7 14 Nucellar SO+Carrizo 13 Nucellar Data: Julie Gmitter and Chunxian Chen
  • 128. Protocol for Citrus somatic hybridization Suspension Protoplast Leaf protoplast Protoplast fusion Leaf incubation Suspension incubation Protoplast ring Two Cells Stage Four Cells Stage Multiple cells Stage
  • 129. Globular Heart Torpedo Somatic hybrid Somatic hybrids of W murcott + Snack Development of hybrid tissue via somatic embryogenesis
  • 130. Genetic Manipulation of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
  • 131. A B A: Leaf and stem explants of S. chacoense B: Shoot regeneration from S. chacoense leaves C D C: Regeneration from leaf and stem explants of Desiree D: Regeneration from leaf Explant of Desiree
  • 132. E F E: Leaf-derived protoplasts of S. chacoense F: Suspension-derived protoplasts of Desiree
  • 133. Culture of Protoplasts IPE FPE Plating density Culture methods Liquid culture Agarose droplets 5x104, 1x105, 1.5x105 ,2x105 Plating efficiency
  • 134. G H I J G: Dividing protoplast of Desiree H: Agarose droplet culture of Desiree protoplasts I: Protoplast calli on proliferation medium J: Regenerating protoplast calli of Desiree
  • 135. Somatic Hybridisation 1:1 mix. of Desiree and S. chacoense protoplasts Electrofusion Incubation (30 min.) and centrifugation of fused protoplasts Droplet culture in MS (modified) medium (4-6 weeks) Transfer microcolonies to CG/LSR1 medium (6-8 weeks) Transfer heterotic calli to LSR2 medium (6-8 weeks) Rooting of shoots and transfer to glasshouse
  • 136. K L M K: Fusion of Desiree and S. chacoense protoplasts L: Somatic hybrid callus M: Regeneration from hybrid callus
  • 137. N N: Plants of S. chacoense (L), Desiree (R), and somatic hybrids (centre)
  • 138. P O O: Flower of S. chacoense P: Flower of Somatic hybrid Q Q: Flower of Desiree
  • 139. S T U U: Tubers of Desiree T: Tubers of Somatic hybrid S: Tubers of S. chacoense
  • 140. R R: Leaves of S. chacoense (L), Desiree (R) and Somatic hybrid (Centre) R1: 2n=6x=72 chromosomes of a somatic hybrid R1
  • 141. V V: RAPD profiles generated by primer OPA-2. Lane 1: potato cv. Desiree, Lane 2: S. chacoense, Lane 3: 1:1 mix. of parental DNA, Lanes 4-21: somatic hybrids. Molecular marker = 100 bp. M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
  • 142. SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION Somatic hybridization involves fusion of two distantly related, to closely related plant protoplasts at intraspecific, interspecific, intergeneric, and interfamily levels, with sub sequent regeneration of hybrid cells into hybrid plants.
  • 143. SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION BASICS 1. In vitro culture 2. Protoplast isolation and purification 3. Protoplast fusion 4. Growth and selection of somatic hybrid tissues 5. Confirmation of hybridity 6. Exploitation of S.H.
  • 144. 1. PROTOPLAST ISOLATION  Source material  Procedure for protoplast isolation 1. Mechanical production 2. Enzymatic digestion
  • 145. PROTOPLAST FUSION AND REGENERATION OF SOMATIC HYBRIDS  Protoplast fusion must occur before new walls of plant ppts  New walls begin to regenerate within 2-5 minutes of isolation  Detect with UV microscopy and use of Calcafluor stain  Mitosis occurs about 2-7 days after isolation  Colonies seen in 1-3 weeks
  • 146.
  • 147. METHODS OF PPT. FUSION Spontaneous  Fuse during isolation (callus ppt)  May contain 2-40 nuclei  Thought to be due to coalescence of plasmosdesmatal connections between cells  Prevented by strong plasmolysis Mechanical protoplasts are brought into intimate physical contact mechanically under microscope using micromanipulator and perfusion micropipette. This micropipette is partially blocked within 1 mm of the tip by a sealed glass rod. In this way the protoplasts are retained and compressed by the flow of liquid. By this technique occasional fusion of protoplast has been Induced  Sodium nitrate (NaNo3)  Artificial sea water  Lysozyme  High pH/Ca++  Polyethylene glycol (PEG)
  • 148. INDUCED FUSION Sodium nitrate (Power et al., 1970)  Transfer 1:1 mix of protoplasts to 0.25M NaNO3, incubate for 35 min. and then centrifuge (200 xg), ppt pellet kept at 300 C for 30 min for fusion,fusion mix replaced with 0.1% NaNO3 for 15 min. and washed.  Low rate of heterokaryons (leaf ppt.)  Not in use High pH/Ca ++ (Kelier and Melchers, 1973)  A calcium solution buffered at high pH induces aggregation of the protoplasts and their fusion. (Solution of 0.4M mannitol containing 0.05 M CaCl2 with pH at 10.5, 370 C)  Ca ++ reduces the potential of the surface negative charge on protoplasts, facilitating protoplast adhesion. (-ve charge due to intramembranous phosphate groups)  The high alkalinity (pH 9.5 - 10.4) induces the formation of intramembranous lysophospholipids such as lysolecithin and lysophosphatidyl -ethanolamine that increase membrane fluidity and fusion
  • 149.
  • 150. INDUCED FUSION(CONT.)  PEG (polyethylene glycol) – MWt. 200-20,000 Effective: 6000-8000 MW  Reproducible high production of heterokaryons  Add 0.6 ml of PEG solution to protoplast pellet  Incubate at room temperatuer for 40 minutes with occasional rocking  After fusion, add 0.5 - 1.0 ml culture medium and centrifuge  Resuspend protoplasts in culture medium  Disturbs the charge on the membrane
  • 151. PEG-INDUCED FUSION  A highly water-soluble, non-ionic weak surfactant  A strong affinity of PEG for water causes local membrane dehydration and increased fluidity  PEG itself induces aggregation, but α-tocopherol present as an impurity in commercial grade PEG, actually promotes membrane fusion  When the chain of PEG polymer molecule is long enough (m.wt ≥ 1000) it may act as a mol. bridge between the surfaces of adjacent protoplasts , allow agglutination to occur  PEG of molecular wt 2000-6000 is active in fusion and PEG 200 and 20,000 inactive  Other compounds structurally-related to PEG namely PVP (Polyvinyl pyrrolidone), PVA (Polyvinyl alcohol) and Polyglycerol are also known to induce fusion  PEG can be used with other fusogens to enhance fusion frequency like  Pre-incubation of protoplasts with lysozymes  Combination of PEG with high pH and Ca++  Addition of DMSO  Factors influencing the efficiency of PEG-induced fusion are:  Concentration, MWT. and purity of PEG  pH, Osmolarity  Method of application of solutions in fusion and their elution  Physiological status of protoplasts  Density of protoplasts in fusion solution  Limitations  Impurities in the commercial preparations of PEG cause cyto-toxicity or reduced viability of fusion products  Cause deformation of mitochondria
  • 152.
  • 153. ELECTROFUSION A two-stage process: 1.A non-uniform AC field stimulates close protoplast plasmamembrane contact 2.Short pulse of DC stimulates breakdown of closely aligned plasma membranes producing pores through which cytoplasm of adjacent ppts. flows and causes fusion
  • 154.
  • 155.
  • 156. FACTORS AFFECTING ELECTROFUSION  voltage, frequency and duration of AC and DC  Shorter DC pulses (10-50 µs) at higher voltage (1000-2000 V/cm) are preferable leading to higher viability and PE of ppts.  Higher voltage of DC pulse facilitates overall fusion but t the cost of binary fusions and viability of fusion products  Ppt density, size and cell memebrane properties  Mesophyll ppts tend to fuse readily than suspensioo-derived ones  Large ppts tend to fuse more readily than smaller ones  Calcium ions (micromolar concen.) are required for better alignment of protoplasts  Biochemical means have been tested to improve fusion frequency  (Avidin-biotin high affinity for Higher heterokaryon formation  Exogenous protease (Dispase, Pronase E) to improve fusion freq. of mammalian cells
  • 158. PROTOPLAST FUSION PRODUCTS Bi-nucleate HETEROKARYON LOSS OF ONE NUCLEUS NUCLEAR FUSION CYTOPLASMIC HYBRIDS (CYBRIDS) Somatic hybrid
  • 159.
  • 160. MAINTENANCE OF PROTOPLAST CULTURES  Maintain the protoplast cultures initially for 10-15 days under dark at 25-30°C  Keep at low continuous illumination first at 1,000 lux and gradually increase to 3,000 lux.  Maintain relative humidity in containers during this period to avoid desiccation.
  • 161. 3. SELECTION OF SOMATIC HYBRIDS 1. Manual selection Physical isolation of the hybrid (using physical differentiation like pigmentation or regenerability) 2. Dual fluorescent labeling system (FDA labelled green florescing protoplasts fused with RIT labelled protoplasts emitting a red fluorescence 3. Complementation Procedures inhibiting growth of homokaryons 4, FACS physical sorting of heterokaryons
  • 162. 4. CONFIRMATION OF HYBRIDITY  Morphological  Cytological  Chromosome counting  Flow cytometry  Molecular techniques
  • 163.
  • 164. PLOIDY ESTIMATION BY STOMATA OBSERVATION 1. COLLECT A MATURE LEAF 2. PEEL OFF THE SURFACE CELL LAYER FROM UNDERSURFACE OF THE LEAF USING A PAIR OF TWEEZERS 3. PLACE THE CELL LAYER ON A SLIDE GLASS, AND STAIN WITH A DROP OF 2% SILVER NITRATE SOLUTION 4. AFTER STAINING FOR 1 MINUTE, COVER WITH A COVER SLIP 5. COUNT THE NUMBER OF CHLOROPLAST GRAINS IN A GUARD CELL OF A STOMA UNDER A MICROSCOPE NOTE: APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF CHLOROPLAST GRAINS IN ONE GUARD CELL IS, 2X ··· 2-4 3X ··· 5-6 4X ··· 8-12 (SLIGHTLY VARIED DEPENDING ON SPECIES AND CULTIVARS)
  • 165. CHROMOSOME NUMBER IN SOMATIC HYBRIDS  The chromosome number in the somatic hybrids is generally varied compared to both of the parental protoplasts.  If the chromosome number in the hybrid is the sum of the chromosomes of the two parental protoplasts, the hybrid is said to be symmetric hybrid.  Asymmetric hybrids have abnormal or wide variations in the chromosome number than the exact total of two species. In 1972, Carlson and his associates produced the first inter-specific somatic hybrid between Nicotiana glauca and N. langsdorffii.  In 1978, Melchers and his co-workers developed the first inter-generic somatic hybrids between Solanum tuberosum (potato) and Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). The hybrids are known as ‘Pomatoes or Topatoes’.
  • 166. BENEFITS OF SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION  Elimination of crossing barriers  No loss of genetic information during the formation of gametes  Specific addition of the genomes of two plants  Combination of complex traits without loosing any gene  Unique combinations of nuclear and organellar genomes generate novel germplasm  No strict maternal inheritance of organelles
  • 167. Somatic hybrids developed in crop plants belonging to following major families Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Poaceae, Solanaceae, Rutaceae · Interspecific hybrids have been obtained in Nicotiana, Brinjal, Potato, Tomato,Brassica Medicago, Soyabean, Sugarcane, Datura, Petunia, Sorghum etc. · Intergeneric hybrids are obtained between Tomato x Potato, Tomato x Tobacco, Festuca x Lolium, sugarcane x Bajra, Wheat x Bajra, Brasica x Eruca etc. · Inter tribal hybrids have been developed between Brassica x Arabdopsis and Brassica x lesquerella Fendleri
  • 168. LIMITATIONS OF SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION  a) Somatic hybridization does not always produce plants that give fertile and viable seeds. b) There is genetic instability associated with protoplast culture. c) Tidious selection procedures e) It is not certain that a specific character will get expressed in somatic hybridization. f) Regenerated plants obtained from somatic hybridization are often variable due to protoclonal variations, chromosomal elimination, organelle segregation etc. g) Protoplast fusion between different species/genus is easy, but the production of viable somatic hybrids is not always possible.
  • 169. CYBRIDS  The cytoplasmic hybrids where the nucleus is derived from only one parent and the cytoplasm is derived from both the parents are referred to as cybrids.  The process of formation of cybrids is called cybridization.  During the process of cybridization and heterokaryon formation, the nuclei are stimulated to segregate so that one protoplast contributes to the cytoplasm while the other contributes nucleus alone.  The irradiation with gamma rays and X-rays and use of metabolic inhibitors makes the protoplasts inactive and non- dividing.  Some of the genetic traits in certain plants are cytoplasmically controlled. This includes certain types of male sterility, resistance to certain antibiotics and herbicides. Therefore cybrids are important for the transfer of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS), antibiotic and herbicide resistance in agriculturally useful plants.  Cybrids of Brassica raphanus that contain nucleus of B. napus, chloroplasts of atrazinc resistant B. compestris and male sterility from Raphanus sativas have been developed.
  • 170. Status of mt. and ch genomes in somatic hybrids The somatic hybrids have novel traits due to recombination in mitochondrial genomes. While, Chloroplast genome of either one of the parents stays and the other gets eliminated with the mitotic division in fusion products. The chloroplasts and mitochondrial genomes of parental protoplasts behave differently in the fusion products, that may be due to the structural organization of theses organelles and their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes are able to disperse and fuse in fusion products. While fusion of chloroplast genomes is rare in higher plants. Ch Genome possess two inverted repeats. Intramolecular homologous recombination between these regions leads to the inversion of the unique sequences inserted between them. In contrast, the mitochondrial genome possesses at least two direct repeats, which normally can recombine to generate two or more separate smaller molecules containing intact the sequences of the parent molecule. This model explains the apparent heterogeneity of the mitochondrial genome. Recombination is the rule governing plant mitochondrial DNA organization.
  • 171. Damage occurs when the free radical encounters another molecule and seeks to find another electron to pair its unpaired electron. The free radical often pulls an electron off a neighboring molecule, causing the affected molecule to become a free radical itself. The new free radical can then pull an electron off the next molecule, and a chemical chain reaction of radical production occurs. An antioxidant is a molecule that inhibits the oxidation of other molecules. Oxidation is a chemical reaction that transfers electrons or hydrogen from a substance to an oxidizing agent. Oxidation reactions can produce free radicals. In turn, these radicals can start chain reactions. When the chain reaction occurs in a cell, it can cause damage or death to the cell. Antioxidants terminate these chain reactions by removing free radical intermediates, and inhibit other oxidation reactions. They do this by being oxidized themselves, so antioxidants are often reducing agents such as thiols, ascorbic acid, or polyphenols
  • 172. When two or more protoplasts fuse to form a new cell, the parent nuclei may remain separate or fuse to form a somatic hybrid. If one of the nuclei is lost after fusion the cytoplasms of the two parent protoplasts will still coalesce and form what is known as a cytoplasmic hybrid or cybrid. These contain nucleus of one parent ppt but a mixture of the cytoplasic organelles of both parents. The production of cybrids is an important tech. in breeding programmes where CMS is desirable, because the CMS trait is inheritted through mitochondria. Whereas, the heterokaryons is what we need in s.h experiments, which contains a mixture of cytoplasm and nuclei of both the parent ppts. PPTs are aligned in an AC field which is inhomogeneous and of low voltage and high frequency. The AC causes dielectrophoresis of ppts by inducing a dipole in each ppt. and masking the net surface charge distribution on membranes.The ppts undergoing dielectrophoresis are mutually attracted and consequently bind together to form chains parallel to the field direction. The electrofusion is composed of a non-electrolyte (usually mannitol) to ensure appropriate osmolarity and at the same time enable the dielectrophoretic alignment to occur. Calcium ions at greater than micromolar concentration are required for better alignment of protoplasts. The aligned ppts. Are fused by applying a direct current pulse. DC pulse is generally of high voltage and short duration, which causes a reversable breakdown at the contact zone of two membranes. Such membrane breakdown occurs at several points in the contact zone, simultaneously leading to fusion of cell membranes and subsequent fusion of cell contentsOptimum electrofusion should produce a large number of viable and binary heterokaryons. Parameters such as voltage, frequency and duration of AC and DC, ppt density and cell memebrane properties can all affect the alignment and fusion of protoplasts as well as the viability of fusion products.
  • 173. For practical breeding purpose, it is necessary to either select hybrid cells immediately after fusion or inhibit non-hybrid cells with pre- and/ or post-fusion treatments. There are a no. of factors to be considered:1. There are more no.of hybrid cells among fusion products, the non-hybrid cells include homokaryons as well as non-fused parental protoplasts. Unless culture conditions made favorable for the fusant cells, they will generally be over-grown by the more numerous non-hybrid cells, though there are some exceptions of hybrid vigor. 2. Cell division from protoplasts requires high culture density (104 to 106/ml). But the density of hybrid cells in a fusion popn. Is generally v. low and they are often surrounded by the toxic dead cell debris.3. Selection at the cell level is far more economical than at plant level. 1. Physical isolation of heterokaryon selection is feasible only if the two ppt popn differe cosiderably in physical traits. Such as fusion of green leaf ppts with colorless cell suspension ppts.such heterokaryons can be isolated using a micromanipulator or hand-helled micropippeter, but being too tedious, such application is not popular 2. Dual fluorescent labeling system (FDA labelled green florescing protoplasts fused with RIT labelled protoplasts emitting a red fluorescence 2. Physical separation is automated with Fluorescence-activated cell sorte)Once the labelled ppts are labelled with different fluorochromes (Carboxyfluorescein and scopoletin) the FACS is capable of selecting fusant cells that display dual fluorescence. Major drawback with this tech. is high cost. 2. Genetic or phyiological complementations are highly effective, but the mutants required are not always available. Metabolic complementation relies on irreversible inhibitors rather than mutants and is more versatile. The parental ppts are treated with 2 diff. metabolic inhibitors(one with iodoacetate; the other with Rhodamine 6- G)Following fusion, metabolic complementation allows hybrids to survive, while non- fused ppts are died of the irreversible inhibition.
  • 174. EVER SINCE THE FIRST REPORT ON PROTOPLAST FUSION DERIVED SOMATIC HYBRID PLANTS OF NICOTIANA GUAUCA +- N. LANGSDORFFII BY CARLSON ET AL. (1972), SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION HAS OPENED UP SEVERAL POSSIBILITIES FOR THE PARASEXUAL MANIPULATION OF PLANTS.
  • 175.  intraspecific ( n tr -sp -s f k) also intraspecies ( n tr -sp sh z, -s z)  Arising or occurring within a species or between members of the same species. Interspecific competition, in ecology, is a form of competition in which individuals of different species vie for the same resource in an ecosystem (e.g. food or living space). The other form of competition is intraspecific competition, which involves organisms of the same species. electrolyte /elec·tro·lyte/ (e-lek´tro-lit) a substance that dissociates into ions when fused or in solution, thus becoming capable of conducting electricity electrolyte  a chemical substance which, when dissolved in water or melted, dissociates into electrically charged particles (ions), and thus is capable of conducting an electric current. The principal positively charged ions in the body fluids (cations) are sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), calcium (Ca2+), and magnesium (Mg2+). The most important negatively charged ions (anions) are chloride (Cl-), bicarbonate (HCO3-), and phosphate (PO43-). These electrolytes are involved in metabolic activities and are essential to the normal function of all cells. Concentration gradients of sodium and potassium across the cell membrane produce the membrane potential and provide the means by which electrochemical impulses are transmitted in nerve and muscle fibers.  The concentration of the various electrolytes in body fluids is maintained within a narrow range. However, the optimal concentrations differ in the extracellular fluid and intracellular fluid. An electrolyte imbalance exists when the serum concentration of an electrolyte is either too high or too low.  Stability of the electrolyte balance depends on adequate intake of water and the electrolytes, and on homeostatic mechanisms within the body that regulate the absorption, distribution and excretion of water and its dissolved particles.  The effects of an electrolyte imbalance are not isolated to a particular organ or system. In general, however, imbalances in calcium concentrations affect the bones, kidney and gastrointestinal tract. Calcium also influences the permeability of cell membranes and thereby regulates neuromuscular activity. sodium affects the osmolality of blood and therefore influences blood volume and pressure and the retention or loss of interstitial fluid. potassium affects muscular activities, notably those of the heart, intestines and respiratory tract, and also affects neural stimulation of the skeletal muscles.