1.
The Next Generation of MSP in the U.S.
Future Challenges and Opportunities
Presentation by
Jesse K. Souki, Director
State Office of Planning

2.
MSP Future Challenges and Opportunities
2

3.
Governor
OP
Director
Land Use Planning
Division Division
Statewide Special CZM
GIS Plans Program
3

4.
of Hawaii
s CZM Area (Entire
ea) and Territorial Sea
ometers [12 Nautical
eaward from shoreline)
lometers (1,052 miles)
ine
esident Population of
ion people
n in Ocean Economy

5.
n and Coastal
69 Visitors in 2011
Hawaiian Cultural
s and Gathering Rights
Trust ‐‐ Beach Access
ional Fishing
ercial Fishing
te 40% of our energy
y 2030
cean Thermal Energy
onversion
eawater Air Conditioning
Wave Energy

6.
STAKEHOLDERS AND SYSTEM
ERMITTING AND PLANNING USERS
State Planning Act ‐ County  State Agencies
Plans  County Agencies
Hawaii Ocean Resources  Community / Public
Management Plan  Federal Agencies
Coastal Zone Management  Non‐Governmental
Program
Special Management Area
Organizations (NGO)
Permitting  Researchers and Academia
State Ocean  Ocean Energy
Leases/Conservation District  Commercial Users
Use Permits  Coastal Developers
Statewide GIS Program  Aquaculture

7.
ii State Planning
s a guide for the future
ge development of the
s the goals, objectives,
and priorities for the
s a basis for determining
and allocating limited
s, such as public funds,
human resources, land,
water, and other
s
s coordination of federal,
d county plans, policies,
s, projects, and
ry activities
hes a system for plan
ion and program
tion to provide for an
on of all major state, and
ctivities
unty must adopt
de general plans

8.
ii Ocean
urces
gement Plan
MP is a State plan.
principles to achieve
hensive and integrated
nd coastal resources
ment
y goal is to improve and
he ecological, cultural,
ic, and social benefits
e from ocean resources
nd for future
ons.
on traditional Hawaiian
ment principles
rspectives
onnecting Land and Sea
reserving Our Ocean
eritage
romoting Collaboration
d Stewardship
ental 5‐year
ment priorities

9.
al Zone
gement Program
t of 1972
s program approved in
Consistency
Management Area
ng
mmatic Support for
Management
ves and Policies
ecreational resources
istoric resources
cenic and open spaces
oastal ecosystems
conomic uses
oastal hazards
Managing development
ublic participation
each protection
Marine resources

10.
al Management
Permitting
ented and issued by
unty
controls on
ments within an area
e shoreline to avoid
ent losses of valuable
es
that adequate access,
ation or other means,
c owned or used
, recreation areas, and
reserves is provided
ents CZM objectives
s
nd minor permits

11.
Ocean Leases &
ervation District
ermits
oard of Land and
Resources
e goals, policies and
the State
rence of the director of
rtation
ow leases in marine life
ation district, shoreline
management area, or
ral area reserve if no
impacts
e shall be awarded in
signated as being
ry for national defense
the public's use and
ent of the reefs
use conflicts
nal and customary
n rights and Konohiki
ghts

12.
wide GIS
am
mately 271 data layers;
ne
s marine and coastal
tners from local, state ,
eral agencies
ping proof of concept
ication with coastal
ine layers
cean Recreation Areas
ffshore Installations
ffshore Sewer Lines
estricted Fishing Areas
ables
oral Reefs
Whale Sanctuary Boundaries

13.
HALLENGES OPPORTUNITIES
Planning fatigue  Robust regulatory system
Gap analysis
Sustaining broad stakeholder  Tradition of planning
involvement  Native Hawaiian cultural
Use permits are case by case issues built into
and burden is on the
applicant constitution, statutes, and
Showing decision‐makers and regulations
users that MSP enables fully  Federal Funding Support
informed decision‐making
Terrestrial plans do not for Sub‐Region in NOP
include ocean planning  Enthusiastic supporters
ORMP is not enforceable

14.
Federal CMSP Efforts under the National Ocean Policy

15.
c Region
on Square Kilometers
n Area
s EEZ of American
Commonwealth of the
n Marianas Islands
Hawaii and Guam
ludes EEZs of
ated areas known as
fic Remote Island Areas
Wake, Johnston,
, etc.)
poses of NOP, the
slands Region is
ed of Hawaii, Guam,
nd American Samoa

16.
Executive Branch Interagency Initiative
Recognizes the importance of U.S. oceans
and the Great Lakes
Sets forth nine priority objectives (e.g.,
CMSP)
Recognizes nine regions (e.g., Pacific Islands
Region)
Creates Regional Planning Bodies (RPB) to
implement NOP

17.
Federal members
 Department of Transportation
 Department of Interior (USGS, BOEM, FWS)
 Department of Commerce (NOAA)
 Department of Defense (USMC)
 Joint Chiefs of Staff
 Department of Agriculture (NRCS)
 Environmental Protection Agency
Western Pacific Fishery Management Council member
Two members each from Hawaii, Guam, CNMI,
American Samoa

18.
Fishery Management Council is expected to
nominate their representative in June
Letters to Pacific Islands Region governors
are expected to be mailed in June
Federal RPB members have met
Will be assessing capacity of all agencies to
contribute towards CMSP
Draft charter, draft work plan, and begin
drafting CMSP plan

19.
HALLENGES OPPORTUNITIES
Jurisdictional issues  Form a good working
Funding relationship across territorial,
 Largest cost is travel state, and federal agencies
Expansive region  Create a strategic coastal and
ocean management plan that
Incorporating indigenous
not only incorporates
peoples’ perspective
economic and defense driven
Organizing various and actions, but also culturally
disparate CMSP efforts important and recreationally
across the region important activities

20.
Regional Efforts

21.
ing the PROP
ship between the
rs of Hawaii, American
Guam and CNMI
is to identify coastal
an management
s that require a
ated regional response
eased collaboration to
ely address these issues
unity to collaborate on
nd common coastal
an resource
ment topics
ay be one tool utilized
P for planning purposes
ate formalizing PROP

22.
c Region
nce by Air
aii to
m/CNMI = 3,828
aii to American
a = 2,585
aii to SFO =
m to Brisbane =
m to Japan =

23.
HALLENGES OPPORTUNITIES
Identifying priorities in an  There are existing
expansive region partnerships in the larger
Funding pacific region
 Largest cost is travel  PROP governments have
Expansive region established relationships
Incorporating stakeholder  Gives the Pacific Islands
input Region a stronger voice in
Changes in administration the RPB process
 Leveraging science and
knowledge

24.
Questions?
Office of Planning
State of Hawaii
P.O. Box 2359
Honolulu, HI 96804‐2359
Ph: (808) 587‐2846
URL: http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/