1.
The Next Generation of MSP in the U.S.Future Challenges and OpportunitiesPresentation by Jesse K. Souki, DirectorState Office of Planning

2.
MSP Future Challenges and Opportunities 2

3.
Governor OP DirectorLand Use Planning Division DivisionStatewide Special CZM GIS Plans Program 3

4.
of Hawaiis CZM Area (Entire ea) and Territorial Sea ometers [12 Nautical eaward from shoreline) lometers (1,052 miles) ineesident Population of ion people n in Ocean Economy

5.
n and Coastal 69 Visitors in 2011 Hawaiian Cultural s and Gathering RightsTrust ‐‐ Beach Access ional Fishingercial Fishing te 40% of our energy y 2030 cean Thermal Energy onversion eawater Air ConditioningWave Energy

6.
STAKEHOLDERS AND SYSTEM ERMITTING AND PLANNING USERS State Planning Act ‐ County  State Agencies Plans  County Agencies Hawaii Ocean Resources  Community / Public Management Plan  Federal Agencies Coastal Zone Management  Non‐Governmental Program Special Management Area Organizations (NGO) Permitting  Researchers and Academia State Ocean  Ocean Energy Leases/Conservation District  Commercial Users Use Permits  Coastal Developers Statewide GIS Program  Aquaculture

7.
ii State Planning s a guide for the future ge development of the s the goals, objectives, and priorities for the s a basis for determining and allocating limited s, such as public funds, human resources, land, water, and other s s coordination of federal, d county plans, policies, s, projects, and ry activitieshes a system for plan ion and program tion to provide for an on of all major state, and ctivitiesunty must adopt de general plans

8.
ii Ocean urces gement Plan MP is a State plan. principles to achieve hensive and integrated nd coastal resources menty goal is to improve and he ecological, cultural, ic, and social benefits e from ocean resources nd for future ons.on traditional Hawaiian ment principles rspectives onnecting Land and Seareserving Our Ocean eritageromoting Collaboration d Stewardshipental 5‐year ment priorities

9.
al Zone gement Program t of 1972 s program approved in ConsistencyManagement Area ngmmatic Support for Managementves and Policies ecreational resources istoric resources cenic and open spaces oastal ecosystems conomic uses oastal hazardsManaging development ublic participation each protectionMarine resources

10.
al Management Permitting ented and issued by unty controls on ments within an area e shoreline to avoid ent losses of valuable es that adequate access, ation or other means, c owned or used , recreation areas, and reserves is provided ents CZM objectives s nd minor permits

11.
Ocean Leases & ervation District ermitsoard of Land and Resourcese goals, policies and the Staterence of the director of rtationow leases in marine life ation district, shoreline management area, or ral area reserve if no impactse shall be awarded in signated as being ry for national defense the publics use and ent of the reefs use conflicts nal and customary n rights and Konohiki ghts

12.
wide GIS am mately 271 data layers; nes marine and coastal tners from local, state , eral agenciesping proof of concept ication with coastal ine layers cean Recreation Areas ffshore Installations ffshore Sewer Lines estricted Fishing Areas ables oral ReefsWhale Sanctuary Boundaries

13.
HALLENGES OPPORTUNITIESPlanning fatigue  Robust regulatory systemGap analysisSustaining broad stakeholder  Tradition of planninginvolvement  Native Hawaiian cultural Use permits are case by case issues built into and burden is on the applicant constitution, statutes, and Showing decision‐makers and regulationsusers that MSP enables fully  Federal Funding Support informed decision‐makingTerrestrial plans do not for Sub‐Region in NOPinclude ocean planning  Enthusiastic supportersORMP is not enforceable

14.
Federal CMSP Efforts under the National Ocean Policy

15.
c Region on Square Kilometers n Areas EEZ of American Commonwealth of the n Marianas Islands Hawaii and Guam ludes EEZs of ated areas known as fic Remote Island Areas Wake, Johnston, , etc.)poses of NOP, the slands Region is ed of Hawaii, Guam, nd American Samoa

16.
Executive Branch Interagency InitiativeRecognizes the importance of U.S. oceans and the Great LakesSets forth nine priority objectives (e.g., CMSP)Recognizes nine regions (e.g., Pacific Islands Region)Creates Regional Planning Bodies (RPB) to implement NOP

17.
Federal members Department of Transportation Department of Interior (USGS, BOEM, FWS) Department of Commerce (NOAA) Department of Defense (USMC) Joint Chiefs of Staff Department of Agriculture (NRCS) Environmental Protection AgencyWestern Pacific Fishery Management Council memberTwo members each from Hawaii, Guam, CNMI, American Samoa

18.
Fishery Management Council is expected to nominate their representative in JuneLetters to Pacific Islands Region governors are expected to be mailed in JuneFederal RPB members have metWill be assessing capacity of all agencies to contribute towards CMSPDraft charter, draft work plan, and begin drafting CMSP plan

19.
HALLENGES OPPORTUNITIESJurisdictional issues  Form a good working Funding relationship across territorial,  Largest cost is travel state, and federal agenciesExpansive region  Create a strategic coastal and ocean management plan that Incorporating indigenous not only incorporates peoples’ perspective economic and defense driven Organizing various and actions, but also culturally disparate CMSP efforts important and recreationally across the region important activities

20.
Regional Efforts

21.
ing the PROP ship between the rs of Hawaii, American Guam and CNMI is to identify coastal an management s that require a ated regional response eased collaboration to ely address these issuesunity to collaborate on nd common coastal an resource ment topicsay be one tool utilized P for planning purposesate formalizing PROP

22.
c Region nce by Air aii to m/CNMI = 3,828 aii to American a = 2,585 aii to SFO = m to Brisbane = m to Japan =

23.
HALLENGES OPPORTUNITIESIdentifying priorities in an  There are existing expansive region partnerships in the larger Funding pacific region  Largest cost is travel  PROP governments have Expansive region established relationshipsIncorporating stakeholder  Gives the Pacific Islands input Region a stronger voice in Changes in administration the RPB process  Leveraging science and knowledge

24.
Questions? Office of Planning State of Hawaii P.O. Box 2359 Honolulu, HI 96804‐2359 Ph: (808) 587‐2846 URL: http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/