It is increasingly recognized that no single country,donor, agency or any individual effort can effectively resolve the environmental management problems of today including those of the coastal and marine environment.
2. Sustaining Environmental Management Efforts
Partnerships
Frameworks and platforms for collective action
Capacity
Sustained financial resources
3. Building Partnerships in Environmental Management
It is increasingly recognized that no single country,
donor, agency or any individual effort can effectively
resolve the environmental management problems of
today including those of the coastal and marine
environment.
Intergovernmental, inter-agency and inter-sectoral
partnerships are key solutions to most environmental
management problems encountered.
5. Understanding Partnership
An agreement to work together to achieve common
objectives
Dynamic process: a beginning and an end
Managed relationship
Time and patience
Requires nourishing and reassurance
Built on mutual interest and trust
6. Partnership and Participation
Share common objective: shared vision
A partner should
Share benefits: expertise, knowledge, financial
resources
Share risks: uncertainties, failures
Involved and informed
Participating in major decision-making
Understand the objective, process and targets
7. Factors Driving Partnerships
Transboundary environmental impacts
Potential safety or environmental risks
Donor/project driven partnerships
Perceived needs for collective actions
8. PEMSEA’s Experience in Building
Partnerships and Sustainability
Building partnerships at the local level
Partnerships at work
Building intergovernmental partnerships
9. Building Partners at the Local Level by Applying
Integrated Coastal Management
The ICM Development and Implementation Cycle
10. ICM Framework and Process Builds Partnerships
Preparing
Refining &
Consolidating
Implementing
Adopting
Developing
Initiating
11
22
33
44
55
66
Policymakers
Scientists
Civil society
Communities
Private sector
NGOs
Media
Donors
12. The ICM Framework
Coastal profiling
Technical Support
Risk assessment and risk management
Natural resource damage assessment and valuation
Policy analysis
Data gathering and information management
Environmental investment analysis
Sea use zoning
13. The ICM Framework
Technical knowledge
Capacity building
Management and technical capability
Leadership
Project development and management
Financial management
14. The ICM Framework
Development and implementation of communication
plans
Communication
Public awareness
Stakeholders participation
15. The ICM Framework
Policy reform
Development and implementation of coastal strategy
Strategies and action programs
Implementing strategies
16. The ICM Framework
Awareness campaign
Adoption and implementation of programs of actions
Work plan and budget
17. The ICM Framework
Performance indicators
Monitoring and evaluation
Evaluation process
Monitoring changes
18. The ICM Framework and Process
Allow the identification and involvement of a variety
of stakeholders and partners
Enable the participation of partners at different stages
of the ICM cycle
Allow time for maturing of partnership arrangement
Allow changing of unsuccessful partnership
21. ICM Institutional Mechanism in Batangas, Philippines
Batangas Bay
Council for ICM
BCRMF
PG-ENRO MG-ENRO
Provincial
Governor’s
office
Coastal city/
municipalities
Provincial
Development
Council
Municipal
Development
Council
Coastal
municipalities
22. Institutional Arrangements for Strategy
Implementation in Danang, Vietnam
People’s Committee of
Danang City
ICM Project Coordinating
Committee
Central Government
ICM Project
Management Office
Multi-disciplinary
Technical Advisory
Groups
Sectors/
Departments
Research and
Academic
institutions
Consulting and
investment
agency
Civil
associations
Districts
and
communes
Private
sector
27. Partnerships in ICM Training
MOA between PEMSEA and Municipal Government ofMOA between PEMSEA and Municipal Government of
Xiamen, in collaboration with Xiamen University andXiamen, in collaboration with Xiamen University and
State Oceanic AdministrationState Oceanic Administration
PEMSEA Regional Center for Coastal and MarinePEMSEA Regional Center for Coastal and Marine
ManagementManagement
28. Partnership with Business Communities
Promotes corporate responsibility
Sharing knowledge and expertise (e.g., oil spill
response
Environmental investment
Promotes compliance with environmental instruments
29. Inter-sectoral Partnerships
• Bataan Coastal Care
Foundation
– 18 national and multi-national
corporations
• Batangas Coastal Resources
Management Foundation,
Inc.
– 21 corporations
• Manila Bay
– 12 major industries and
business associations signed
the Manila Bay Declaration
PromotingPromoting
corporatecorporate
responsibilityresponsibility
30. Partnerships in Environmental Monitoring in Xiamen
Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic
Administration
Environmental Monitoring Station of Xiamen
Environmental Research Center of Xiamen University
Monitoring Stations of Fujian Fishery Institute
Fujian Oceanography Research Institute
Monitoring Station of Xiamen Port
31. Building Alliance Towards Intergovernmental Partnerships
Declaration
Regional strategic framework
32. Intergovernmental Partnerships
Bohai Sea Declaration – commitmentBohai Sea Declaration – commitment
of 3 provincial and 1 city governmentof 3 provincial and 1 city government
to cooperateto cooperate
Manila Bay Declaration –Manila Bay Declaration –
commitment of 4 provincial and onecommitment of 4 provincial and one
metropolitan government tometropolitan government to
cooperatecooperate
Bohai Sea Declaration – commitmentBohai Sea Declaration – commitment
of 3 provincial and 1 city governmentof 3 provincial and 1 city government
to cooperateto cooperate
Manila Bay Declaration –Manila Bay Declaration –
commitment of 4 provincial and onecommitment of 4 provincial and one
metropolitan government tometropolitan government to
cooperatecooperate
Development of shared visions,Development of shared visions,
strategies and action plansstrategies and action plans
Identification of environmental issues
Endorsement of required actions
from various stakeholders
October 2001
Manila Bay Coastal Strategy
33. PEMSEA Programme Steering Committee
Country participation
1996 – 11 countries1996 – 11 countries
1999 – 11 countries1999 – 11 countries
2002 – 12 countries2002 – 12 countries
1995 - 10 countries1995 - 10 countries
1994 - 5 countries1994 - 5 countries
Funding from governments
1999 - 3.3 million USD1999 - 3.3 million USD
2001 - 8.4 million USD2001 - 8.4 million USD
2002 - 8.9 million USD2002 - 8.9 million USD
35. Strategic Framework at the Regional Level
Sustainable Development StrategySustainable Development Strategy
for the Seas of East Asiafor the Seas of East Asia
• 5 strategies
• 20 action objectives
• 212 programs of actions
37. Sustainable Development Strategy for the Seas
of East Asia
Promotes regional cooperation for addressing
environmental relationships across national
boundaries
Harmonize interactions and enhance synergies
between economic development and environmental
management
Reinforces relationships between a healthy
environment and social issues such as poverty
alleviation, food security, employment and
human health.
Provides platform for partnerships among countries
of the region, the private sector, NGOs, academe,
local communities and other members of the civil
society and UN international agencies.
38. River Basins Draining into the East Asian Seas
The river basins that
are associated with
the EAS cover a total
area of 6.25 million
km2
and accommodate
about 1.5 billion people.
The EAS serves as the
catchment area of the
associated upstream
river basins.
Partnership should
therefore extend
towards the river
basins of the region.
39. National Efforts Towards Coastal and
Ocean Governance
Ocean Agenda 21 (China, South Korea)
Institutional reforms
Coastal policy (Malaysia, in preparation)
National coastal/marine policy and strategy
(Philippines, in preparation)
Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Affairs (RO Korea
and Indonesia)
ICM legislation (RO Korea)
Sea use legislation (China)
40. Regional Coordinating Mechanisms for the
Implementation of the SDS-SEA
Intergovernmental partnerships
Regional Financing Mechanism for the Implementation
of SDS-SEA
Multi-sector partnerships
41. Financing Environmental Management
Public sector
Private sector (BOT, BOO)
Public private sector partnership
Polluters pay and permit system
Carbon credit
Methane credit
Wetland trading
Others
42. Public Funds for Environmental Management
Subsidized sanitation and water supply facilities
Integrated cost of action programs into national or
local government budget (e.g., most governments)
43. Polluters Pay and Use Permit System
Sea use zoning Permit system
Xiamen, China
44. Public Private Sector Partnerships
Environmental problemsEnvironmental problems
Pollution
Siltation and
sedimentation
Habitat degradation
etc.
Investment opportunitiesInvestment opportunities
Solid waste management
facility
Sewerage system
Wastewater treatment
Toxic and hazardous
waste facility
Shore reception facility
Awareness and consensus among government
units and stakeholders
Instituting policy and regulatory framework
Creating environmental investment opportunities
45. Public Private Sector Partnership
Investor / Contractor
‘Private Sector’
Municipality
‘Public Sector’
Local Contractors
and Suppliers
Financial
Investors
New
Company
(PPP)
shared risk – shared rewardsshared risk – shared rewards
46. New Challenges: WSSD
Building a stronger Public Private Sector
Partnerships appears to be the biggest challenge in
the future in achieving the Millennium Development
Goal and targets set by WSSD. The new challenge lies
in how we can effectively transform environmental
problems from being a public liability into economic
opportunities. The role of the private sector cannot be
underestimated.
Marine environmental degradation is often a result of inefficient management of the multiple uses of the coastal and marine areas. Inadequacy in environmental planning at local and national levels, coupled with policy, institutional and enforcement failures are key contributing factors. Remedial measures are often expensive and may take up as much as 0.8 to 1 per cent of the national gross domestic product (World Bank 1998). The direct cause, however, is the lack of needed capacity especially at the local level to plan and manage their natural resources. The lack of political will is often blamed for most environmental failures, but the inability to link economic and social benefits to environmental management often makes environmental issues low in the political and economic agenda of most countries.
Marine environmental degradation is often a result of inefficient management of the multiple uses of the coastal and marine areas. Inadequacy in environmental planning at local and national levels, coupled with policy, institutional and enforcement failures are key contributing factors. Remedial measures are often expensive and may take up as much as 0.8 to 1 per cent of the national gross domestic product (World Bank 1998). The direct cause, however, is the lack of needed capacity especially at the local level to plan and manage their natural resources. The lack of political will is often blamed for most environmental failures, but the inability to link economic and social benefits to environmental management often makes environmental issues low in the political and economic agenda of most countries.
Marine environmental degradation is often a result of inefficient management of the multiple uses of the coastal and marine areas. Inadequacy in environmental planning at local and national levels, coupled with policy, institutional and enforcement failures are key contributing factors. Remedial measures are often expensive and may take up as much as 0.8 to 1 per cent of the national gross domestic product (World Bank 1998). The direct cause, however, is the lack of needed capacity especially at the local level to plan and manage their natural resources. The lack of political will is often blamed for most environmental failures, but the inability to link economic and social benefits to environmental management often makes environmental issues low in the political and economic agenda of most countries.
In Xiamen University, China, the active involvement of multi-disciplinary experts in the Xiamen ICM project has resulted in developing a pool of multidisciplinary expertise and experience upon which the university bases its national training program to promote coastal management for the country.
An MOA was signed with the Municipal Government of Xiamen (July 2001) establishing a PEMSEA Regional Center for ICM, in collaboration with the Xiamen University and the State Oceanic Administration.
The Center will undertake ICM training activities to help build regional capacity.
Marine environmental degradation is often a result of inefficient management of the multiple uses of the coastal and marine areas. Inadequacy in environmental planning at local and national levels, coupled with policy, institutional and enforcement failures are key contributing factors. Remedial measures are often expensive and may take up as much as 0.8 to 1 per cent of the national gross domestic product (World Bank 1998). The direct cause, however, is the lack of needed capacity especially at the local level to plan and manage their natural resources. The lack of political will is often blamed for most environmental failures, but the inability to link economic and social benefits to environmental management often makes environmental issues low in the political and economic agenda of most countries.
Changes arising from implementation of the Strategy will be documented and assessed. Further refinement is done through integrated environmental monitoring and reporting, scientific research and South-South cooperation.
These measures do not only advance knowledge of ecosystem management but also provides inputs to sustainable economic development, innovations, practices and technologies at the national and local levels.
Marine environmental degradation is often a result of inefficient management of the multiple uses of the coastal and marine areas. Inadequacy in environmental planning at local and national levels, coupled with policy, institutional and enforcement failures are key contributing factors. Remedial measures are often expensive and may take up as much as 0.8 to 1 per cent of the national gross domestic product (World Bank 1998). The direct cause, however, is the lack of needed capacity especially at the local level to plan and manage their natural resources. The lack of political will is often blamed for most environmental failures, but the inability to link economic and social benefits to environmental management often makes environmental issues low in the political and economic agenda of most countries.
Marine environmental degradation is often a result of inefficient management of the multiple uses of the coastal and marine areas. Inadequacy in environmental planning at local and national levels, coupled with policy, institutional and enforcement failures are key contributing factors. Remedial measures are often expensive and may take up as much as 0.8 to 1 per cent of the national gross domestic product (World Bank 1998). The direct cause, however, is the lack of needed capacity especially at the local level to plan and manage their natural resources. The lack of political will is often blamed for most environmental failures, but the inability to link economic and social benefits to environmental management often makes environmental issues low in the political and economic agenda of most countries.