Evalutation report

1
ERASMUS+ MUSIC IS … LIFE LONG LEARNING
EVALUTATION REPORT
In order to evaluate the ongoing process and results of the project, the Erasmus+
Management Group elaborate this report and present it to the Steering Committee for its
approval.
1. Project Management Organs
In order to ensure efficient and effective management of the project two organs have been
formed:
The Management Group who will assume the task of managing the implementation of the
project and a Steering Committee that will oversee and monitor the following activities:
A) If the commissioning of the project work is in line with the project specifications
B) The quality of the products
C) Eligibility of project expenditure.
The project management group is formed by the Coordinators of each school and will be
chaired by the Coordinator of the coordinating institution.
The Steering Committee is composed by the Heads of the participating institutions and,
apart from what has been indicated above, will have the authority to take all necessary
measures to address the project in order to ensure the quality, effectiveness and impact of
the same. Both bodies will be meeting during the transnational meetings, where the work
of the project carried out up to that point will be estimated and the budget expenses will
be validated.

2
2. Sections of the report and its updates.
The present report will examine the following subjects:
 Quality of the project’s activities and results
 Risk monitoring and control
 Indicator of achievement of project objectives
 Measure of project impacts
 Budget control and assessment
 Work Break Down Structure of the Project
The report has been elaborated by the Management Group and has been submitted for its
approval to the Steering Committee on the occasion of Transnational Project Meetings
starting from the second one. During the first TPM (Kick-off Meeting) has been discussed
and approved the report format.
3. Quality of the project’s activities and results
Quality control process
The quality control process will focus on the assessment of the following aspects:
1) Quality of on-site activities carried out by participating pupils;
2) Quality of Joint Staff Training Events;
3) Quality of Short-term exchanges of group of pupils;
4) Quality of intermediate and final products (Good Practices and Guidelines Manual)
5) Quality of dissemination events.
The tools used for quality control, and analyzed in the report, are as follows:
a) analysis of the beneficiaries' satisfaction (students, teachers, families) through
questionnaires, interviews, focus groups;
b) assessment of impact the activities carried out on the competences (average results and
dispersion) and student motivation (test before starting and at the end of the activities,
observation of teachers, etc);
c) evaluation of Joint Training Events through anonymous questionnaires to the
participating teachers;
d) questionnaires to students and families on the Short Term Exchange of Pupils carried
out abroad;
e) assessment of the Manual of Good Practices and Guidelines also by external teacher at
the Erasmus+ working groups that will contribute to the verification of the quality of
intermediate and end products produced, through the evaluation of their use and
functionality. This check will be made, on the drafts realized to date, twice: at the end of
the first year of operation and immediately before the last meeting of the transnational
project;
f) questionnaire at the end of dissemination events.

3
QUALITY ASPECT EVALUATED 1) Quality of on-site activities carried out by participating pupils
TOOL USED a) Analysis of the beneficiaries' satisfaction (students, teachers, families)
through questionnaires, interviews, focus groups
QUALITY OF ON-SITE
ACTIVITIES
STUDENTS’
SATISFACTION
(on a scale from 1 –
lower to 4 – higher)
TEACHERS’
SATISFACTION
FAMILIES’
SATISFACTION
COMMUNICATION IN MOTHER LANGUAGE
Istituto Comprensivo di Alba
Adriatica
3,28 2,98 3,05
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 3,50 3,40 3,59
Liceul de Arte Regina Maria
Alba Iulia
3,76 4,00 3,78
Agrupamento de Escolas de
Vieira de Leiria
3,64 3,27 3,74
Szkola Podstawowa nr 2 im.
Jana Kochanowskiego
4,00 3,81 4,00
AVERAGE 3,64 3,49 3,63
BASIC COMPETENCES IN SCIENCE
Adriatica
3,13 2,77 3,10
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 3,50 3,63 3,50
Alba Iulia
3,56 4,00 3,71
Vieira de Leiria – date …
3,68 3,59 3,92
Jana Kochanowskiego – date …
4,00 3,93 3,50
AVERAGE 3,57 3,58 3,55
MATEMATICAL COMPETENCE AND BASIC COMPETENCES IN TECHNOLOGY
Adriatica – date …
3,37 2,77 3,11
Ceip Gloria Arenillas – date … 3,93 3,62 3,88
Alba Iulia – date …
3,74 3,77 3,73
3,77 3,99 3,82
4,00 3,88 3,76
AVERAGE 3,76 3,61 3,66

4
QUALITY OF ON-SITE
ACTIVITIES
STUDENTS’
SATISFACTION
TEACHERS’
SATISFACTION
FAMILIES’
SATISFACTION
INCLUSION
3,15 2,95 3,08
3,54 3,92 3,68
3,58 3,69 3,52
3,77 3,80 3,56
AVERAGE 3,54 3,60 3,50
LEARNING TO LEARN
3,41 3,25 3,20
3,80 3,93 3,80
3,68 3,49 3,62
3,56 4,00 3,63
AVERAGE 3,65 3,72 3,58

5
TOOL USED b) assessment of impact of the activities carried out on competences (average
results and dispersion) - test before starting and at the end of the activities.
QUALITY OF ON-SITE
ACTIVITIES
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– AVERAGE
BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– DIPSERSION
BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– AVERAGE
AFTER
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– DISPERSION
AFTER
Adriatica
2,74 27,7% 2,99 23,4%
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 2,74 21,9% 3,27 15,9%
Alba Iulia
3,26 9,5% 3,72 8,1%
Vieira de Leiria
3,08 14,3% 3,60 10,3%
Jana Kochanowskiego
3,02 19,2% 3,48 11,8%
AVERAGE 2,97 18,2% 3,41 13,5%
2,71 31,0% 2,95 25,8%
Ceip Gloria Arenillas – date … 1,86 14,0% 3,10 20,3%
3,06 24,5% 3,55 15,8%
3,56 14,6% 3,73 10,5%
2,79 19,3% 3,40 15,6%
AVERAGE 2,80 20,7% 3,35 17,0%
2,49 35,7% 2,74 33,9%
3,29 14,6% 3,80 7,9%
2,86 23,1% 3,46 16,5%
2,84 14,4% 3,54 9,6%
AVERAGE 2,77 21,0% 3,39 16,0%

6
QUALITY OF ON-SITE
ACTIVITIES
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– AVERAGE
BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– DIPSERSION
BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– AVERAGE
AFTER
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– DISPERSION
AFTER
INCLUSION
2,68 29,5% 2,78 27,3%
2,55 27,4% 3,36 16,7%
2,86 23,1% 3,46 16,5%
3,21 14,3% 3,59 9,7%
AVERAGE 2,77 24,2% 3,27 17,3%
LEARNING TO LEARN
2,62 22,5% 3,08 21,7%
3,34 19,5% 3,83 8,9%
3,48 19,4% 3,42 10,2%
3,02 20,9% 3,44 14,8%
AVERAGE 2,97 20,5% 3,40 14,4%

7
TOOL USED b) assessment of impact the activities carried out student motivation
(observation of teachers)
QUALITY OF ON-SITE
ACTIVITIES
IMPACT ON
MOTIVATION –
AVERAGE BEFORE
(on a scale from 1 –lower
to 4 – higher)
IMPACT ON
MOTIVATION –
AVERAGE AFTER
Adriatica
2,81 3,14
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 2,76 3,34
Alba Iulia
2,74 3,57
Vieira de Leiria
3,20 3,40
Jana Kochanowskiego
3,23 3,45
AVERAGE 2,95 3,38
2,82 3,17
Ceip Gloria Arenillas – date … 2,78 3,60
3,27 3,53
2,71 3,76
2,99 3,48
AVERAGE 2,95 3,49
MATEMATICAL COMPETENCE AND BASIC COMPETENCES IN
TECHNOLOGY
2,75 2,99
3,49 3,85
2,71 3,43
2,67 3,29
AVERAGE 2,88 3,47

8
QUALITY OF ON-SITE
ACTIVITIES
IMPACT ON
MOTIVATION –
AVERAGE BEFORE
to 4 – higher)
IMPACT ON
MOTIVATION –
AVERAGE AFTER
INCLUSION
2,77 2,91
2,81 3,12
2,71 3,43
3,21 3,53
AVERAGE 2,91 3,29
LEARNING TO LEARN
2,65 3,35
3,21 3,85
2,82 3,35
2,79 3,32
AVERAGE 2,88 3,45

9
QUALITY ASPECT EVALUATED 2) Quality of Joint Staff Training Events
TOOL USED c) evaluation of Joint Training Events through anonymous questionnaires to
the participating teachers
QUALITY OF ON JOINT
STAFF TRAINING EVENTS
EVALUTAION OF
TEACHERS –
to 4 – higher)
C1 – 1st Training Event – Spain -
date
3,63
C3 – 2nd Training Event –
Romania - date
3,96
C5 – 3rd Training Event –
Portugal - date
3,77
C7 – 4th Training Event – Poland
- date
3,83
C9 – 5th Training Event – Italy -
date
3,96

10
QUALITY ASPECT EVALUATED 3) Quality of Short-term exchanges of group of pupils
TOOL USED d) questionnaires to students and families on the Short Term Exchange of
Pupils carried out abroad
QUALITY OF SHORT-TERM
EXCHANGES OF GROUPS
OF PUPILS
EVALUTAION OF
PUPILS –
to 4 – higher)
EVALUTAION OF
FAMILIES –
to 4 – higher)
C2 – 1st Exchange – Spain - date 3,67 3,67
C4 – 2nd Exchange – Romania -
date
3,73 3,73
C6 – 3rd Excghange – Portugal -
date
3,52 3,52
C8 – 4th Exchange – Poland -
date
3,67 3,67
C10 – 5th Exchange – Italy - date 3,74 3,74

11
QUALITY ASPECT EVALUATED 4) Quality of intermediate and final products (Good Practices and
Guidelines Manual)
TOOL USED e) assessment of the Manual of Good Practices and Guidelines also by
external teacher at the Erasmus+ working through the evaluation of their
use and functionality.
QUALITY OF GOOD
PRACTICES AND
GUIDELINES MANUAL
INTERMEDIATE
EVALUATION
to 4 – higher)
FINAL
EVALUATION
Adriatica
2,73 3,27
Alba Iulia
3,17 3,77
Vieira de Leiria
2,72 3,26
Jana Kochanowskiego
2,89 3,29
AVERAGE 2,92 3,46

12
QUALITY ASPECT EVALUATED 5) Quality of dissemination events
TOOL USED f) questionnaire at the end of dissemination
QUALITY OF
DISSEMINATION EVENTS
INITIAL
DISSEMINATION
EVENT
to 4 – higher)
FINAL
DISSEMINATION
EVENT
Adriatica
3,62 3,83
Alba Iulia
3,92 3,92
Vieira de Leiria
3,18 3,89
Jana Kochanowskiego
3,83 3,92
AVERAGE 3,62 3,85
After each Dissemination Event parents were invited to fill in a paper form of 4 question in order to evaluate the Event.
For instance in the initial dissemination event in Alba Adriatica we collected 87 forms out of 250 approximately
participants to the event, with an average evaluation of 3,62. The same methodology has been applied to all the other
events.

13
4. Risk monitoring and control
Risk management process
The identification of project risks is not an event to be held only once. As the project evolves, new
risks may manifest itself and must be addressed accordingly.
The Project Management Group analyze the possible risks, identified in a dynamic check list and
cooperatively define if the risk occurred or not.
If the risk takes place the P.M.G. evaluate the possible impact and plan the possible response.
The risk assessment is made at least on the occasion of each Transnational Project Meeting, starting
from the 2nd one.
The P.M.G. presents its conclusion and proposal to the Steering Committee that is entitled to take
any necessary decision.
FIRST RISK ASSESSMENT – 2ND TRANSNATIONAL PROJECT MEETING
RISK CHECK-LIST ON/
OFF
POSSIBLE IMPACT PLANNED RESPONSE
Products not sufficiently
defined
OFF
Deviation from the project OFF
Limited availability of
required skills
OFF
Project deadlines OFF
Funding/budget shortage OFF
Conflict OFF

14
SECOND RISK ASSESSMENT – 3RD
TRANSNATIONAL PROJECT MEETING
RISK CHECK-LIST ON/
OFF
defined
OFF
required skills
OFF
Project deadlines ON Delay in the production of
the first draft of the Manual
of Good Practice
The Management Group and the
Steering Committee agreed to use
summer months to define the draft
of the Manual and discuss it
during the meeting to be held in
Portugal in November 2017
Conflict OFF

15
THIRD RISK ASSESSMENT – 4TH
RISK CHECK-LIST ON/
OFF
defined
OFF
required skills
OFF
Project deadlines OFF Delay in the production of
the first draft of the Manual
of Good Practice
The accumulated delay was
recovered during the summer
months and the draft manual was
examined in Portugal
Conflict OFF

16
FOURTH RISK ASSESSMENT – 5TH
RISK CHECK-LIST ON/
OFF
defined
OFF
required skills
OFF
Conflict OFF

17
FIFTH RISK ASSESSMENT – 6TH
RISK CHECK-LIST ON/
OFF
defined
OFF
required skills
OFF
Conflict OFF
5. Indicator of achievement of project objectives
In order to track the achievement of objectives and results and the measurement of their
success, it applies a simple, yet effective, monitoring and evaluation system.
Indicators of results
The following indicators divided into three categories have been identified:
1. Quantitative indicators
2. qualitative indicators
3. imperatives indicators
The indicators of the project taking into account the principle of equal opportunities for
participation in the program in terms of equality of Gender and the involvement of target
groups in disadvantaged situations.
Quantitative indicators measure the participation of target groups and the number of
activities carried out in the scope of the project.

18
Quantitative Indicators
PARTECIPATION OF
PUPILS TO ON SITE
ACTIVITIES
NUMBER OF
PARTECIPATING
PUPILS
% OUT OF TOTAL
SCHOOL
POPULATION
% FEMALE
(PROXY)
% FEWER
OPPORTUNITIES
PUPILS
Istituto Comprensivo di
Alba Adriatica
628 52% 50% 14,7%
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 147 100% 44% 22%
Liceul de Arte Regina
Maria Alba Iulia
99 32% 56,5% 32,3%
Agrupamento de Escolas
de Vieira de Leiria
160 88,8% 48% 7,5%
Szkola Podstawowa nr 2
im. Jana Kochanowskiego
640 42% 50% 17%
AVERAGE 1674 63% 49,7% 16,6%
Alba Adriatica
583 48,5% 50% 10,8%
Maria Alba Iulia
172 55,5% 61% 28,4%
de Vieira de Leiria
168 68,8% 49% 9,6%
512 34% 50% 21%
AVERAGE 1567 61,4% 50,8% 16,9%
Alba Adriatica
409 34,1% 50% 16,7%
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 133 100% 44% 12,8%
Maria Alba Iulia
206 62,8% 51% 32%
de Vieira de Leiria
158 72% 44% 7,2%
709 47% 50% 14%
AVERAGE 1615 63,2% 47,8% 16,2%
INCLUSION
Alba Adriatica
409 34,1% 50% 16,7%
Maria Alba Iulia
288 87,8% 68,4% 48,9%
de Vieira de Leiria
168 68,8% 49% 9,6%
810 54% 50% 14%
AVERAGE 1807 68,9% 52,3% 20,3%

19
PARTECIPATION OF
PUPILS TO ON SITE
ACTIVITIES
NUMBER OF
PARTECIPATING
PUPILS
% OUT OF TOTAL
SCHOOL
POPULATION
% FEMALE
(PROXY)
% FEWER
OPPORTUNITIES
PUPILS
LEARNING TO LEARN
Alba Adriatica
409 34,1% 50% 16,7%
Maria Alba Iulia
224 68,3% 50,8% 33,4%
de Vieira de Leiria
170 73% 48% 7,2%
463 30% 50% 23%
AVERAGE 1398 61,1% 48,6% 20,5%

20
PARTECIPATING OF
TEACHERS
ON SITE
ACTIVITIES
TRAINING EVENTS
Adriatica
47 3
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 14 NOT RELEVANT
Alba Iulia
15 2
Vieira de Leiria
12 2
Jana Kochanowskiego
45 3
TOTAL 133 10
Adriatica
43 2
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 14 3
Alba Iulia
80 NOT RELEVANT
Vieira de Leiria
12 2
Jana Kochanowskiego
47 2
TOTAL 196 9
MATEMATICAL COMPETENCE AND BASIC COMPETENCES IN
TECHNOLOGY
Adriatica
32 3
Alba Iulia
14 2
Vieira de Leiria
12 NOT RELEVANT
Jana Kochanowskiego
41 1
TOTAL 115 9
INCLUSION
Adriatica
32 5
Alba Iulia
25 1
Vieira de Leiria
12 2
Jana Kochanowskiego
83 NOT RELEVANT
TOTAL 166 11

21
PARTECIPATING OF
TEACHERS
ON SITE
ACTIVITIES
TRAINING EVENTS
LEARNING TO LEARN
Adriatica
32 NOT RELEVANT
Alba Iulia
15 2
Vieira de Leiria
12 2
Jana Kochanowskiego
50 3
TOTAL 123 10

22
PARTECIPATION OF
PARENTS
INITIAL
DISSEMINTION
EVENT – NR
INITIAL
DISSEMINATION
EVENT - %
FINAL
DISSEMINTION
EVENT – NR
FINAL
DISSEMINATION
EVENT - %
Alba Adriatica
250 10,4% 500 20,8%
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 190 65% 195 67%
Alba Iulia
280 45,3% 370 59,8%
Vieira de Leiria
220 73,3% 350 89%
Jana Kochanowskiego
210 21,0% 430 43%
AVERAGE 230 43% 369 55,9%
NUMBER OF DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES
(EVENTS, PRESS CONFERENCES,
WORKSHOPS, PRESENTATIONS, ETC.)
Alba Adriatica
11
Ceip Gloria Arenillas 13
Alba Iulia
18
Vieira de Leiria
12
Jana Kochanowskiego
6
TOTAL 60
Istituto Comprensivo di Alba Adriatica: Initial press conference, Initial Dissemination Event, Seminar-Workshop with
Dalcroze Association, 4 press releases on the occasion of each mobility, Final Dissemination Event, Tv Interview, Press
realese, Final concert.
Ceip Gloria Arenillas:
 Aragonees Meeting of Innovative Experiences in Education.
 Music Meeting: Musical Education Trainers.
 European Projects Meeting. "Joaquin Costa School" Conference.
 Emotional Intelligence Congress I.
 Emotional Intelligence Congress II.
 Meeting with District Councilor.
 Meeting with European Member of Parliament.
 Meeting with Head of Education Program Unit.
 Meeting with the University Dean.
 Meeting with the headteacher of the CIFE (Center of Innovation and Educational Formation)
 Newspaper (Heraldo Escolar).
 Facebook.
 WIX.
Liceul de Arte ”Regina Maria” Alba Iulia: newspapers (3 or 4), school website, radio, television, teachers councils (3),
regional teachers meetings (1), regional symposium (1), initial major dissemination concert, students and teachers
workshops (5), G clef presentation.

23
Agrupamento de Escolas de Vieira de Leiria – Portugal:
 Several publications in newspapers – Jornal da Marinha Grande/Região de Leiria
 Dissemination in eTwinning event held in Leiria, Portugal.
 Dissemination in eTwinning event held in Vieira de Leiria, Portugal.
 Distribution of a newsletter to all teachers, parents and students of the School.
 Dissemination in the festive season of Carnival to all the comunity of Vieira de Leiria.
 The project Erasmus + Music is ... Life Long Learning was announced at the Agrupamento de Escolas de Vieira
de Leiria to a group of teachers interested and committed to promoting new and interesting challenges for our
students.
 Dissemination of the project in the iniciative INCODE2030, Coimbra.
 Musical activities in different schools of the Agrupamento de Escolas de Vieira de Leiria.
 Music workshop with Paulo Lameiro in SAMP.
 Music Workshop in Orfeão de Leiria
 Workshop – Music – “One kind of expression” with Paulo Tojeira
 Presentation of the project Erasmus + Music is ... Life Long Learning in Ciclo de Conferências Teachers Training
Center Leirimar
 Presentation of the project Erasmus + Music is ... Life Long Learning in XVIII ENCONTRO DAS TIC NA
EDUCAÇÃO – Leiria
 Presentation of the project Erasmus + Music is ... Life Long Learning in the Municipality of Marinha Grande
 Presentation of the project Erasmus + Music is ... Life Long Learning in the Junta de Freguesia de Vieira de
Leiria
 This project received the quality label of the eTwinning project in Portugal and is a candidate for the European
Quality Label of the eTwinning project.
Szkola Podstawowa nr 2 im. Jana Kochanowskiego: Initial press release, Initial Dissemination Event, Final Dissemination
Event, Tv Interview, Press realese, Final concert.

24
Qualitative Indicators
The qualitative indicators have been developed in order to provide a thorough analysis of
the work done by partnership project. This information is obtained through surveys of
target groups and satisfaction of their behaviour change, through self-assessment
questionnaires recipients and focus groups and interviews with teachers, including non-
participants in the project, related to the project products. These indicators are:
a) improvement obtained on key competences of pupils;
b) improving and strengthening the inclusion of children with fewer opportunities, both in
relation to the skills and relative to their welfare;
c) improving the quality of education and early childhood care, greater focus on skills and
strengthening of vertical integration with the next cycle;
d) enhancement of the educational tools available to teachers, their effectiveness and
usability;
e) comprehensibility and usability of the Manual of Best Practices and Guidelines.
Indicators a) and e) have been already measured and analyzed in the quality control
process section.
b) improving and strengthening the inclusion of children with fewer opportunities, both in
relation to the skills and relative to their welfare;
QUALITY OF ON-
SITE ACTIVITIES
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
AVERAGE BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
DIPSERSION
BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
AVERAGE AFTER
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
DISPERSION
AFTER
IMPACT ON
WELFARE-
ASSESSMENT OF
TEACHERS
Istituto
Comprensivo di
Alba Adriatica
1,98 34,3% 2,41 27,0% 2,58
Ceip Gloria
Arenillas
2,23 25,1% 2,83 18,0% 2,96
Liceul de Arte
Regina Maria Alba
Iulia
3,25 13,5% 3,69 12,7% 3,57
Agrupamento de
Escolas de Vieira de
Leiria
3,10 13,4% 3,42 9,2% 3,44
Szkola
Podstawowa nr 2
im. Jana
Kochanowskiego
2,55 25,1% 3,23 14,9% 3,13
AVERAGE 2,62 22,3% 3,12 16,4% 3,14

25
QUALITY OF ON-
SITE ACTIVITIES
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– AVERAGE
BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
DIPSERSION
BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
AVERAGE AFTER
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
DISPERSION
AFTER
IMPACT ON
WELFARE-
ASSESSMENT OF
TEACHERS
Istituto
Comprensivo di
Alba Adriatica
1,78 32,6% 2,20 25,9% 2,50
Ceip Gloria
Arenillas
2,21 24,8% 2,87 18,3% 2,96
Liceul de Arte
Regina Maria Alba
Iulia
2,91 25,1% 3,52 14,2% 3,53
Agrupamento de
Leiria
2,30 6,1% 2,80 0,0% 3,00
Szkola Podstawowa
nr 2 im. Jana
Kochanowskiego
2,16 25,5% 2,88 25,0% 3,30
AVERAGE 2,23 25,1% 2,83 18,0% 2,96
Istituto
Comprensivo di
Alba Adriatica
1,96 38,3% 2,28 34,6% 2,80
Ceip Gloria
Arenillas
1,96 19,4% 3,04 11,2% 3,73
Liceul de Arte
Regina Maria Alba
Iulia
3,23 13,9% 3,78 8,5% 3,85
Agrupamento de
Leiria
2,20 15,9% 2,87 4,2% 3,00
Szkola Podstawowa
nr 2 im. Jana
Kochanowskiego
2,37 6,3% 3,64 9,06% 3,50
AVERAGE 2,34 18,8% 3,12 13,5% 3,38
INCLUSION
Istituto
Comprensivo di
Alba Adriatica
1,90 36,8% 2,29 38,8% 2,68
Ceip Gloria
Arenillas
2,02 38,6% 2,83 22,2% 3,70
Liceul de Arte
Regina Maria Alba
Iulia
2,44 28,7% 3,23 17,9% 3,12
Agrupamento de
Leiria
2,20 15,9% 2,87 4,2% 3,00
Szkola Podstawowa
nr 2 im. Jana
Kochanowskiego
2,70 25,2% 3,20 16,3% 2,75
AVERAGE 2,25 29,0% 2,88 19,9% 3,05

26
QUALITY OF ON-
SITE ACTIVITIES
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES
– AVERAGE
BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
DIPSERSION
BEFORE
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
AVERAGE AFTER
IMPACT ON
COMPETENCES –
DISPERSION
AFTER
IMPACT ON
WELFARE-
ASSESSMENT OF
TEACHERS
LEARNING TO LEARN
Istituto
Comprensivo di
Alba Adriatica
2,00 21,0% 2,47 25,1% 2,83
Ceip Gloria
Arenillas
2,42 25,8% 2,97 20,3% 3,21
Liceul de Arte
Regina Maria Alba
Iulia
3,28 19,8% 3,81 8,9% 3,85
Agrupamento de
Leiria
2,15 36,3% 2,47 25,1% 2,83
Szkola Podstawowa
nr 2 im. Jana
Kochanowskiego
2,40 27,1% 3,00 23,0% 3,20
AVERAGE 2,45 26,1% 2,94 20,5% 3,18
c) improving the quality of education and early childhood care, greater focus on skills and
strengthening of vertical integration with the next cycle. It will be carried out a
questionnaire of self-assessment among teachers of Infant School at the end of the first
year and again at the end of the second year. The Romanian School will not evaluate this
aspect, because it doesn’t have infant school
QUALITY OF
EDUCATION AND
EARLY CHILDHOOD
CARE
IMPACT ON
QUALITY OF EECC -
INTERMEDIATE
ASSESSMENT OF
TEACHERS -
(on a scale from 1 –lower to
4 – higher)
IMPACT ON
QUALITY OF EECC -
FINAL ASSESSMENT OF
TEACHERS -
(on a scale from 1 –lower to 4
– higher)
Istituto Comprensivo
di Alba Adriatica
3,03 3,31
Agrupamento de
Leiria
3,22 3,49
Szkola Podstawowa nr
2 im. Jana
Kochanowskiego
3,76 3,96
AVERAGE 3,34 3,67

27
d) enhancement of the educational tools available to teachers, their effectiveness and
usability. It will be carried out a questionnaire of self-assessment among all teachers of the
five Schools at the end of the first year and again at the end of the second year.
ENHANCEMENT OF
EDUCATIONAL
TOOLS
INTERMEDIATE
ASSESSMENT OF
TEACHERS -
(on a scale from 1 –lower to 4
– higher)
FINAL ASSESSMENT
OF TEACHERS –
(on a scale from 1 –lower to
4 – higher)
Istituto Comprensivo
di Alba Adriatica
2,94 3,38
Maria Alba Iulia
3,81 3,93
Agrupamento de
Leiria
3,17 3,29
Szkola Podstawowa nr
2 im. Jana
Kochanowskiego
3,65 3,83
AVERAGE 3,37 3,58

28
Imperatives indicators
The imperatives indicators are measured on intermediate products and final project, are
used to monitor and assess whether the product delivered corresponds to what was
agreed. They are "YES" / "NO" indicators to track what has been delivered or not. The
results monitored are those indicated as direct results of the project on pag. 27 of the Form.
PROJECTS PRODUCTS INTERMEDIATE
ASSESSMENT
(YES/NO)
FINAL ASSESSMENT
(YES/NO)
Preparation of methodologies for
assessing educational activities
impact
YES
Realization of educational/
informational material in electronic
format on the activities and results
obtained
YES
Good Practices Manual (digital and
printed)
NO
Guidelines (digital and printed) NO
Organization of information events YES
Organization of conferences/
presentations addressed to other
schools to disseminate the project
results
YES
Joint Staff Short Term Training
Events
YES
Implementation of communication
and dissemination material: press
releases, brochures, posters, etc
YES
Publication of the project website,
presence on social networks and on
E-TWINNING platform
YES
Final Dissemination Event - in Alba
Adriatica (IT) at the end of the
project
YES

29
Evaluation Strategy
The assessment of achievement of project objectives involves three steps.
I. ex-ante evaluation
II. Formative evaluation in progress
III. final evaluation
I. The ex-ante evaluation focuses on the system of the project and its development, the
objectives that have been established and the joint work plan proposed. It is realized in the
weeks immediately prior to the initial project meeting. The tools for this phase are
questionnaires that coordinators of the school has administered to the participating
teachers and to the others.

30
The ex-ante evaluation results are discussed during the kick-off meeting to refine, if
necessary, the project system.
II. Formative evaluation in progress.
This phase lasts for the entire life cycle of the project and focuses on the work of the project
and that the work and of intermediate and final products with those agreed in the work
plan.
The issues to be analyzed during the ongoing evaluation are: on-time delivery of the
partner institutions work; if the work continues at the time and according to common
decisions; product quality; the active participation of school communities, etc.
III. Final evaluation
The final evaluation shall focus on the end products of the project, its results and impact in
the development of key skills (average results and dispersion), the inclusion of students
with fewer opportunities and the quality of education and care of the first childhood. The
final evaluation shall assess the immediate usability of the products and the transferability
of the results to other schools.

31
6. Measure of project impact
The impact of the project on the participants, the participating organisations, target
groups, other relevant stakeholders and at local, regional, national and European level will
be measured through a set of indicators and instruments.
1) Competences of Students: the measurements will be performed (by test or tests) of
sample classes before the start of activities and at the end of activities. The effects will be
obtained from the project activities both in terms of the average results of both dispersion
from the average. This item is already measured in the Quality of the project’s activities
and results section.
2) Cognitive processes of students (memory, thinking, imagination): observation of
teachers. This item is already measured in the Quality of the project’s activities and results
section.
3) Motivation, learning climate, the European spirit of the students: questionnaires and
interviews.
MOTIVATION, LEARNING
CLIMATE, EUROPEAN
SPIRIT
INTERMEDIATE
EVALUATION
to 4 – higher)
FINAL
EVALUATION
Adriatica
3,24 3,91
Alba Iulia
3,53 3,88
Vieira de Leiria
3,02 3,87
Jana Kochanowskiego
3,27 3,72
AVERAGE 3,29 3,83

32
4) Professional Growth of Teachers: questionnaires and interviews.
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
OF TEACHERS
INTERMEDIATE
EVALUATION
to 4 – higher)
FINAL
EVALUATION
Adriatica
3,14 3,41
Alba Iulia
2,90 3,82
Vieira de Leiria
3,27 3,46
Jana Kochanowskiego
3,27 3,72
AVERAGE 3,08 3,54
5) Improvement of school organization: self-assessment reports with reference to the
process indicators (climate, education planning, professional competence of teachers,
teaching tools kits, etc) and performance (student achievement, dispersion of results,
increase in registration, etc). This item will be evaluated by Head Teachers.
IMPROVEMENT OF SCHOOL ORGANIZATION
AVERAGE
EVALUATION OF
HEAD TEACHERS
(on a scale from 1 –lower to 4 –
higher)
PROCESS INDICATORS 3,71
How do you evaluate the impact of the project on the school climate? 3,67
How do you evaluate the impact of the project on education planning? 3,67
How do you evalutate the impact of the project on teachers professional competences? 3,67
How do you evaluate the project in terms of enrichment of educational tools? 3,83
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 3,89
Are you satisfied with the impact of the project in terms of student performance (results
and decrease of dispersion of results)?
3,67
Do you think that the project had a positive effect on enrollment at your institution? 4,00
What is you overall evaluation of the project in terms of benefits for your school? 4,00

33
6) Collaboration with families and Climate: questionnaires.
COLLABORATION WITH
FAMILIES AND CLIMATE
INTERMEDIATE
EVALUATION
to 4 – higher)
FINAL
EVALUATION
Adriatica
3,26 3,94
Alba Iulia
3,07 3,67
Vieira de Leiria
2,90 3,58
Jana Kochanowskiego
2,91 3,74
AVERAGE 3,13 3,77
7) Image and reputation of the school: coverage of the media, number of updates, visits
and consultation of the web page and channels on social networks, the number of
participants in the dissemination events of the project, etc.
IMAGE AND
REPUTATION OF
THE SCHOOL
PRESENCE ON
MASS MEDIA
(number)
PARTECIPANTS TO
INITIAL
DISSEMINATION
EVENTS
(number)
PARTECIPANTS TO
FINAL DISSEMINATION
EVENTS
(number)
VISITS OF
WEB PAGE
(number)
VISITS OF
FACEBOOK
PAGE
(number)
Istituto
Comprensivo di
Alba Adriatica
9 250 500 A medium
of 320 visits
per month
A medium
of 50
visitors per
day, a total
of more
thank 6.000
visits in the
last 6
months
Ceip Gloria
Arenillas
7 190 195
Liceul de Arte
Regina Maria Alba
Iulia
11 280 370
Agrupamento de
Escolas de Vieira
de Leiria
6 220 350
Szkola
Podstawowa nr 2
im. Jana
Kochanowskiego
8 210 430
TOTAL 41 1.150 1.845

34
7. Budget control and assessment
In order to ensure an appropriate budget control two instruments will be used:
 The Mobility Tool
 An excel-form
The Mobility Tool provided by the European Commission will be updated regularly with
the supervision and counselling of the Coordinating School. Support will be provided as
well by each National Agency.
The excel form has been implemented in order to track effective costs and to handle the
financial management of the project during the entire life cycle. Each school will update its
own section and budget will be validated during each Transnational Project Meeting by
the Steering Commitee.
The following table summarizes the total figures of an interim Meeting and was used to
discuss whether the resources had been used in line with the progression of the project.
Budget Effective Difference %
Management 36.000,00€ 4.213,51€ 31.786,49€ 11,7%
TPM 27.315,00€ 4.260,72€ 23.054,28€ 15,6%
STTE 20.180,00€ 2.493,00€ 17.687,00€ 12,4%
EXCH 55.520,00€ 2.845,00€ 52.675,00€ 5,1%
COSTS 15.600,00€ 73,20€ 15.526,80€ 0,5%
TOTAL 154.615,00€ 13.885,43€ 140.729,57€ 9,0%

35
8. Work Break Down Structure of the Project and Gantt Chart

Evalutation report

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Evalutation report

Similar to Evalutation report (20)

More from Soares Jose Soares

More from Soares Jose Soares (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Evalutation report