SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 177
Sub: Deletion of data being outdated and
inaccurate in the name of the company and
its CMD Pavan Sachdeva.
We would like to bring to your kind attention
the following data loaded in google search
engine:
Justification for deletion of such
information :-
1 Special Report India Today – April,1995
The heading MS Shoes case :
Pavan Sachdeva arrested, SEBI and Merchant
Bankers come under the cloud. (copy
enclosed as Annexure-1).
Individuals have the right to be forgotten as
held by EU Top Court.
become outdated as well as inaccurate,
irrelevant, no longer relevant, inadequate and
excessive in relation to the purpose for which
they were processed in the light of the time
that has a elapsed.
Deletion of such information does not amount
to censorship in view of several
changes/current information for last 20 years
from the date of reporting .
The CMD and the company has gone into
several changes of the said allegations in the
data provided by your company.
The changes and the developments are as
follows :
It was wrongful arrest by CBI.
The allegations in the FIR were completely
wrong in law.
mentioned in the report have been decreed in
favour of the company as on 3.7.2010. The
court has declared the cancellation as null &
void and inoperative.
closed on the closure report filed by CBI in
Sept., 1998 and the closure report was
accepted by the First Class Magistrate of
Mumbai vide its order dated 30.9.1998.
The criminal complaint of the company is
pending before Court against the persons who
filed a wrong FIR with ulterior motives
motivated by the competitors of the company.
crores public & right issue and for propping
of the shares has no relevance in the view of
the closure of the FIR which was reported in
the newspapers but the same is not reflected
in the data on Google, copy of the closure
report is annexed as Annexure-II.
The allegation in the report that there were
co-conspirators does not stand any more as
the FIR was closed as back as in Sept.,1998.
The allegations that officials flouted number
of guidelines to give monitory advantage to
the company’s promoter also does not stand
in view of the closure of the FIR in 1998.
The allegations that SBI Caps gave false due
diligence certificate stands closed on the
closure of the FIR.
the report that if issue is above Rs. 50 crores
not more than 25% should be collected on
application are completely wrong in view of
the SEBI guidelines at the relevant time, in
support the copy of SEBI regulations at the
relevant time is annexed as Annexure-III.
The allegations in the report the SEBI
exempted from bringing in the promoters
quota for Rs. 85.65 crores for the public issue
is also are wrong reporting in the said report.
right issue was subscribed is also wrong
reporting as there was no SEBI guidelines at
the relevant time to instruct the stock
exchanges to stop the release of the proceeds
since the proceeds are not with Delhi Stock
Exchange but always remained with the
banks as trustee of the investors.
and other documents is also false in view of
the fact that the prospectus was vetted by
SEBI, Registrar of Companies and Regional
Stock Exchange as well, however such
allegations are reported from the FIR which
have no relevance in view of the closure of
the FIR in Sept., 1998.
company to collect 50% subscription on
application and exempted him from bringing
in the promoters quota is also false in view of
the SEBI guidelines and the relevant time.
of shares of MS Shoes for the purpose of
rigging the price to deceive the generally
ignorant investors is also completely false as
there was no rigging or no insider trading
that has been found in the investigations by
CBI.
The allegations in the version of Sh. Y.P.
Singh that he had “evidence of pay off” to
SEBI officials to overlook were also false in
view of the findings in investigations.
High Court of Bombay as the entire
allegations & investigations in the FIR has
been closed since on the same allegations
another complaint cannot be filed and its
stand admitted by High Court of Bombay, the
copy of the order is annexed as Annexure-IV.
Sh. Y.P. Singh version as reported in the said
report stands closed by his own investigations
in the FIR.
per the investigations of CBI which were
closed in Sept., 1998, in regard to bridge loan
it may be brought to your kind notice that
they stand paid by the company and as such
presently there are no debtors of the company
neither any banks nor any institutions, in
regard to the hotel project its stand decreed in
favour of the company vide order dated
3.7.2010, copy of the order is annexed as
Annexure-V.
2. Frontline – Volume 17, Issue 16, august 5
– 18, 2000.
Controversy – The MS Shoes Affairs
from FIR have no stand and is irrelevant
information in the view of the said fact that
the FIR was closed in Sept., 1998 besides in
respect of these allegations in the report are
not justified in view of the above details
given in point no. 1.
As reported that apparently the Govt. has got
report from CBI months ago on the MS Shoes
case is completely false in view of the closure
of the FIR in Sept., 1998.
In respect of Hudco also the report at present
is completely irrelevant in view of the decree
& judgment passed by the Court.
irrelevant as well as inadequate besides that it
is no longer relevant and that it is excessive in
relation to the purpose for which they were
processed in the light of the time that has a
elapsed.
The deletion of the said report does not
amount censorship in view of the supported
documents enclosed herewith.
3 Indiainfoline.com
• 2.5.2014
Company Profile by Sanjay Jhaveri, CFA
• (copy enclosed as Annexure-3). The allegations that the company
misrepresented the company shares price in its advertisement is a false
information in view of the closures of such allegations and court orders which
have been annexed herewith.
The report has been reported in May, 2014
giving the false allegations in the company
profile besides the fact that such allegations
are outdated as well as inaccurate.
The allegations that Bombay Stock Exchange
threatened not to grant listing is also false
information besides the fact that the case is of
1995.
cost of the company is also false in view of
the fact that the project was appraised by a
premium institution Tourism Financial
Corporation of India.
company ultimately led into devolvement of
the issue is also false as the issue was
devolved because of under subscription
within 60 days of the closing date of the
issue.
proceedings is also false in view of the
closure report as well as the court order in
Sept., 1998 besides the fact that the
information provided is of the current year
May, 2014.
Shoes East Ltd., 5 NWA, Punjabi Bagh Extn.,
New Delhi 1-110026 is also false as all times
since 1995 the company’s Registrar Mas
Services Ltd.
Jhaveri, CFA which are false should not be
kept in data by google and in fact no further
analyses of such persons should be allowed to
be downloaded in the data.
the underwriters and they have been decreed
in favour of the company, one of the order
passed is enclosed as Annexure-VI although
there are almost 50 decrees passed against 50
underwriters amounting to more than Rs. 98
crores.
The information which is false and if deleted
would not amount to censorship.
4 Business Standard, Kolkata – 12.6.1998
DRT Likely to Auction MS Shoes Properties.
(copy enclosed as Annexure-4).
Business Standard, Kolkata – 9.3.1998
Refund Allahabad Bank Rs. 21.49 crores, MS
Shoes told. (copy enclosed as Annexure-5).
The allegations that most of the project
having failed to take off is of 1998 and the
current situations are entirely different in
view of the decree in favour of the company.
Allahabad Bank is also irrelevant in view of
the fact that entire amount has been paid to
Allahabad Bank as back on 23.5.2009, copy
of the letter from Allahabad Bank is annexed
as Annexure-VII.
fact that DRT proceedings have been closed
as back as in July, 2009, the copy of the DRT
order closing the proceedings is annexed as
Annexure-VIII.
the company has no relevance as presently
there are no debtors of the company, the
audited financial report of March, 2014 is
annexed as Annexure-IX, the debtors were
paid longtime back by the company
Such report presently are invalid and have to
be forgotten under the circumstances they
have become outdated as well as inaccurate.
in relation to the purpose for which they were
processed in the light of the time that has a
elapsed. In view of which such information
is neither legitimate nor legal information and
would not amount to censorship if it is
deleted.
by EU Top Court that involved in a debt
recovery operations still continuous to appear
on the online specially such data is existing
long after the legal dispute has been resolved
by the company.
irrelevant and has no longer relevant in the
light of the time that has elapsed besides the
fact that the entire amount stands paid to
Allahabad Bank as back as in year 2009, the
relevant documents are already annexed.
5. Indian Express – 14.7.1997
MS Shoes case finally comes for hearing
(copy enclosed as Annexure-6).
outdated in view of the fact that suit in
respect of 5 star hotel land has been decreed
in favour of the company and the judgment
has been annexed herewith.
Leela Hotels & Convention Ltd. (LHCL) is
also outdated in view of the fact that Leela’s
allotment had been cancelled by Hudco as
back as in July, 1999.
6. Watchoutinvestors.com
Statement showing cases wherein notices u/s
142 of Customs Act,1962 issued on or after
1.4.2003. (copy enclosed as Annexure-7).
against the defaulters, the amounts have been
shown in total approximately Rs. 16 crores is
completely and outdated information since
the show cause notices have been dropped,
copy of the orders dropping the show cause
notices are annexed as Annexure-X (Colly).
since the company into 100% exports and as
such modvat could have never been availed,
the copy of the certificate issued by excise
department is annexed as Annexure-XI.
shown as nature of offence that we failed to
fulfill condition of export obligation u/s
203/92 Cos. is completely wrong in view of
the fact the conditions of the alleged section
had been complied with by the company.
initiating recovery action has been taken is
also false in view of the fact that all the show
cause notices stand dropped against the
company and as such there is no recovery by
the Central Revenue Department.
The information is required to be deleted as it
is outdated in view of the orders and the
certificate annexed herewith.
7. Express India. Com –
26.8.2002
since long including the other group
companies have also paid the entire amounts
to the banks and at present there are no
liabilities whatsoever of any of the group
companies, the letters from the
banks/financial institutions showing
evidencing there are no liabilities towards
them are annexed as Annexure- XII (colly)
which included also of the group companies.
The allegations that Bombay Stock Exchange
threatened not to grant listing is also false
information besides the fact that the case is of
1995.
cost of the company is also false in view of
the fact that the project was appraised by a
premium institution Tourism Financial
Corporation of India.
company ultimately led into devolvement of
the issue is also false as the issue was
devolved because of under subscription
within 60 days of the closing date of the
issue.
proceedings is also false in view of the
closure report as well as the court order in
Sept., 1998 besides the fact that the
information provided is of the current year
May, 2014.
8. A.P. Associate Press – 7.4.1995
after scandal closes market (copy enclosed as
Annexure-9). The allegations in the report
that Pavan Sachdeva cheated the investors
stands closed vide closure report of CBI as
already justified above.
was never involved into any purchase of
shares from any stock exchange or any
broker, thus the allegations of rigging the
shares of the company are also false in the
light of the fact that the CBI has closed the
FIR.
two officials of SBI Capital Markets and the
allegations of these officials conniving with
Pavan Sachdeva for financial gains is also
irrelevant in the light of the fact that the FIR
registered by CBI stands closed.
Any allegations in respect of the Stock
Brokers is not concerned with the company or
Pavan Sachdeva.
9 Tradeindia.com
India Largest B2 Market Place.
Shoes affair and MS Shoes has gone to the
cleaners besides the fact is that all these
reports pertain to April, 1995 which are more
than 20 years old, there are all irrelevant,
outdated and are also inaccurate besides that
they are excessive in relation to the purpose
for which they were processed and in the light
of the time that has elapsed.
10 Citeman Network only business
community knowledge base.
Capital Market Scams by Sree Rama Rao on
1.7.2009.
• (copy enclosed as Annexure-11). The allegation that March, 1995
another scam known as MS Shoes scam master mind by export, Pavan
Sachdeva, rigged up price of shares, leading eventuality to a crash are
completely baseless in view of the fact that such allegation have been reported
from the FIR of CBI which stands closed since 1998 while this article is
written in 2009. There are no allegation that subsist presently in respect of
share prices alleged to be rigged besides it is a proved fact that the company
nor Pavan Sachdeva rigged the prices of the company’s shares. The allegation
that the market were closed for three days is baseless as the brokers did not
default due to the company or Pavan Sachdeva. The shares were purchased by
the brokers on certain vested interest and in any case such allegation do not
stand proved against the company or Pavan Sachdeva in view of the closure
report accepted by the Court as well as the stay granted by High Court in
respect of complaint under the Companies Act filed by CBI in 1998, the
closure and stay order has already been annexed as Annexure –II & IV.
that has elapsed such reports should not be
entertained even if written by Sree Rama Rao
who has not reported the change facts of the
case in view of which the said report is
required to be corrected and till then should
be deleted as it would not amount to
censorship.
11 Business Standard, Kolkata. 21.4.1997 by
Cherian Thomas
14.3.2007 and the awards have already been
decided in favour of the company by the
Arbitrator in June, 2012 which have been
decreed in favour of the company, the copy
of the order of High Court appointing the
arbitrator is annexed as Annexure-XIII and
copy of the decree passed by High has
already been annexed as annexure – VI.
irrelevant which is no longer relevant as well
as it is excessive in relation to the purpose for
which it was processed and in the light of
time that has elapsed. In view of which such
information would not amount to censorship
if it is deleted.
12 The Financial Express posted online
27.2.2003 reported on 26.2.2003.
IF War on Cor. Defaulters (copy enclosed as
Annexure-13).
of Delhi granted the stay since the FIR was
not found to be correctly registered, however,
the said FIR was quashed vide order dated
19.9.2005 is annexed as Annexure-XIV in
view of which presently the said report is
outdated since the amount stands paid to
Indian Air Force . The information presently
is outdated as well as inaccurate and the
deletion of the same would not amount to
censorship.
13 Rediff on the net business news. Copy
right 1997 Rediff On the Net.
CBI Targets SBI, SEBI officials in MS Shoes
Scam. (copy enclosed as Annexure-14).
would be main accused are irrelevant in view
of the fact that no prosecution had been filed
by CBI, rather closure report was filed in
Sept., 1998 and court had accepted the
closure report, the documents in respect of the
closure have been annexed as Annexure -II &
IV.
of the applications of the subscription and
that SEBI official did not take any precaution
nor did not they instruct Delhi Stock
Exchange not to release the public issue funds
are completely irrelevant and outdated in
view of the fact that such allegations were in
the FIR and they have been closed since
Sept., 1998.
prop up his shares prices also have no
substance and outdated in view of the fact
that the FIR containing such allegations has
been closed since Sept., 1998 and the
complaint under Companies Act also stand
stayed by High Court of Mumbai since 2009.
The said report is outdated as well as
irrelevant and the deletion of the same will
not amount to censorship.
14 expressindia.indian express.com –
11.9.1998. (copy enclosed as Annexure-15).
CBI filed complaint in MS Shoes case
allegation of the complaint as reported in the
report do not persists in view of the fact that
the complaint is of 1998 and in the petition
filed before High Court of Bombay, the court
was appraised of the false allegations due to
which petition was admitted and stands
stayed since 2009 in view of which the said
report is no subsist and outdated.
15 eBook – Pearson Education India
The Indian Financial System : Markets,
Institutions and Services By Bharati V.
Pathak
company nor Pavan Sachdeva rigged the
prices of the company’s shares. The
allegation that the market were closed for
three days is baseless as the brokers did not
default due to the company or Pavan
Sachdeva. The shares were purchased by the
brokers on certain vested interest and in any
case such allegation do not stand proved
against the company or Pavan Sachdeva in
view of the closure report accepted by the
Court as well as the stay granted by High
of the case in view of which the said report is
required to be corrected and till then should
be deleted as it would not amount to
censorship. Further that such allegations have
been carried over from one of the newspaper
report/FIR which has been closed by CBI as
well as the Court in view of which such
allegations are outdated as well as irrelevant
and such the deletion of the same would not
amount to censorship.
16 eBook –
Boost Your Professional Career By S.K.
Bhatia
and such allegations have been carried over
from some of the newspaper report/FIR
which stands closed and the newspaper
reports are outdated in view of the fact that
the company has not cheated any of the
investors which has been supported by the
closure of the FIR in view of which such
allegations are outdated as well as irrelevant
and such the deletion of the same would not
amount to censorship.
17 eBook–
Corporate Governance : Principles, Policies
and Practices By A.C. Fernando
Secondary Markets Reforms (copy enclosed
as Annexure-18).
quotations and that MS Shoes is an example
of market rigging in March , 2001 is
completely false as the company never rigged
the prices as being alleged besides the facts is
that company’s shares were not traded even in
2001 in view of which the said report is
completely false on the face of it which needs
to be considered to be deleted as it would not
amount to censorship at all.
18 eBook–
Business Ethics: An Indian Perspective By
A.C. Fernando
allegations do not stand once the allegations
in the FIR stands closed besides the fact that
the company or Pavan Sachdeva was never
involved in insider trading nor did purchase
any shares as being alleged in the report.
Besides the fact is that the said report has no
relevance due to elapse of time that they were
reported in 1995 besides the fact is that such
report and data is irrelevant and is no longer
relevant as well as it is outdated and
inaccurate.
19 e.book-
India Business Yearbook2009 By Career
Launcher India Ltd.
Misappropriation of
subscribe to right issue entitlement of the
promoters amounting to Rs. 1.3 billion which
caused panic in the stock market have no
relevance in view of the fact that the said
allegations stand closed by CBI in Sept., 1998
in view of which the said report is outdated,
irrelevant as well as excessive in relation to
the purpose in the light of the time that as
elapsed and such deletion would not cause
any censorship.
1 MS Shoes from Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia.
subscription and the issue was devolved on
the underwriters who did not pay within 60
days of the closure of the issue due to which
the entire amount collected from the investors
was refunded by a resolutions passed by the
company 22.4.1995, the letter received from
SBI Market Ltd. in response to letter of SEBI
as well as the resolution passed by the
company are annexed as Annexure. I & II.
Further the certificate issued by the Registrar
mailing all the refund is annexed as
1.5.2012 is also wrong since no such money
was raised from the investors as the entire
amount had to be refunded since the issue
was devolved on the underwriters and
remained undersubscribed till the 60th day of
the closure of the issue and as per terms of
prospectus the said amount was refunded
within the stipulated time by passing a
resolution on 22.4.1995. In respect of the
alleged borrowing from banks & financial
institutions, the company borrowed the
relevance in view of the fact that all such
allegations stand closed since Sept., 1998.
Further that the company has survived very
well and has no complaints of any of the
shareholders and as reported that the
company is defunct (2003) is also completely
wrong in view of the fact that the company
has been abiding by all the laws of country
and has been filing its returns with ROC
regularly.
such the allegation being alleged in the report
in respect Prevention of Corruption Act have
no relevance at present since the allegations
are outdated and inaccurate besides being
irrelevant and excessive in relation to the
purpose for which they were processed and in
the light of the time that has elapsed since the
closure of the FIR.
has been made on report from Nirmala
Ganpati June 6, 2003 the Indian Express,
retrieved 1.5.2012 is completely false in view
of the fact that the FIR was closed in Sept.,
1998 and the closure report was accepted by
the court on 30.9.1998, the same is annexed
as Annexure-IV.
and copy of the FIR has been quashed is
annexed as Annexure-VI in view of which
the said report is irrelevant and outdated and
any retrieval on 1.5.2012 do not support the
actual facts besides the said report is reported
to be modified on 19.4.2014 which does not
have proper reports of the current situations
accept it has been retrieved from the old
reports which are outdated in view of the
changes that have not been reported and as
such the current report modified on 19.4.2014
company filed its reference was registered
with BIFR on 13.6.2002, coy of the same is
annexed as Annexure-VII it was mandatory
to go to BIFR as net worth of the company
had eroded and presently the rehabilitation
scheme submitted by the company to the
Operating Agency and BIFR has been
approved vide order dated 25.10.2013 of
BIFR, copy of the order is annexed as
Annexure-VIII.
devolvement of the issue and the company
also has a decree against Union of India as
well as Hudco for wrongfully forfeiting the
amount of Rs. 68.68 crores in respect of its 5
star hotel projects, the copy of the decree is
annexed as Annexure-IX.
Ms Shoes East Ltd
Ms Shoes East Ltd

More Related Content

What's hot

Best quality Plywood Manufacturers in India
Best quality Plywood Manufacturers in IndiaBest quality Plywood Manufacturers in India
Best quality Plywood Manufacturers in IndiaLavinaSharma6
 
Newsletter dated 13th July, 2015
Newsletter dated 13th July, 2015	Newsletter dated 13th July, 2015
Newsletter dated 13th July, 2015 Proglobalcorp India
 
EODB INDONESIA 2018 - 2019 - Starting Up a Business Handbook
EODB INDONESIA 2018 - 2019 - Starting Up a Business HandbookEODB INDONESIA 2018 - 2019 - Starting Up a Business Handbook
EODB INDONESIA 2018 - 2019 - Starting Up a Business HandbookAydinLemon
 
Permanent account number
Permanent account numberPermanent account number
Permanent account numberAnkit Agarwal
 
2 goods and services tax
2 goods and services tax2 goods and services tax
2 goods and services taxKumar Velivela
 
Landmark Judgment by Company Law Board (CLB), Mumbai Bench Setting Aside the ...
Landmark Judgment by Company Law Board (CLB), Mumbai Bench Setting Aside the ...Landmark Judgment by Company Law Board (CLB), Mumbai Bench Setting Aside the ...
Landmark Judgment by Company Law Board (CLB), Mumbai Bench Setting Aside the ...flashnewsrelease
 
Company registration in india
Company registration in indiaCompany registration in india
Company registration in indiaMukesh Goel
 
Wa44 ab+exhibits
Wa44 ab+exhibitsWa44 ab+exhibits
Wa44 ab+exhibitsB S K RAO
 
Form csrf subscriber registration form
Form csrf subscriber registration formForm csrf subscriber registration form
Form csrf subscriber registration formgurpreetsliet
 
RBI SEBI MCA & Taxation Updates 30th January 2017
RBI SEBI MCA & Taxation Updates 30th January 2017RBI SEBI MCA & Taxation Updates 30th January 2017
RBI SEBI MCA & Taxation Updates 30th January 2017Acquisory Consulting LLP
 
The new Companies Law 2013 (India) - Chapter 11: Appointment and Qualificatio...
The new Companies Law 2013 (India) - Chapter 11: Appointment and Qualificatio...The new Companies Law 2013 (India) - Chapter 11: Appointment and Qualificatio...
The new Companies Law 2013 (India) - Chapter 11: Appointment and Qualificatio...Bold Kiln
 
Alpha Legal updates-March to June, 2013
Alpha Legal updates-March to June, 2013Alpha Legal updates-March to June, 2013
Alpha Legal updates-March to June, 2013Akshat Pande
 

What's hot (16)

Best quality Plywood Manufacturers in India
Best quality Plywood Manufacturers in IndiaBest quality Plywood Manufacturers in India
Best quality Plywood Manufacturers in India
 
It (pan card)
It (pan card)It (pan card)
It (pan card)
 
Newsletter dated 13th July, 2015
Newsletter dated 13th July, 2015	Newsletter dated 13th July, 2015
Newsletter dated 13th July, 2015
 
Acquisory news-bytes-5th-9th-june-2017
Acquisory news-bytes-5th-9th-june-2017Acquisory news-bytes-5th-9th-june-2017
Acquisory news-bytes-5th-9th-june-2017
 
EODB INDONESIA 2018 - 2019 - Starting Up a Business Handbook
EODB INDONESIA 2018 - 2019 - Starting Up a Business HandbookEODB INDONESIA 2018 - 2019 - Starting Up a Business Handbook
EODB INDONESIA 2018 - 2019 - Starting Up a Business Handbook
 
Permanent account number
Permanent account numberPermanent account number
Permanent account number
 
2 goods and services tax
2 goods and services tax2 goods and services tax
2 goods and services tax
 
Landmark Judgment by Company Law Board (CLB), Mumbai Bench Setting Aside the ...
Landmark Judgment by Company Law Board (CLB), Mumbai Bench Setting Aside the ...Landmark Judgment by Company Law Board (CLB), Mumbai Bench Setting Aside the ...
Landmark Judgment by Company Law Board (CLB), Mumbai Bench Setting Aside the ...
 
2016.pdf
2016.pdf 2016.pdf
2016.pdf
 
Company registration in india
Company registration in indiaCompany registration in india
Company registration in india
 
Wa44 ab+exhibits
Wa44 ab+exhibitsWa44 ab+exhibits
Wa44 ab+exhibits
 
Form csrf subscriber registration form
Form csrf subscriber registration formForm csrf subscriber registration form
Form csrf subscriber registration form
 
RBI SEBI MCA & Taxation Updates 30th January 2017
RBI SEBI MCA & Taxation Updates 30th January 2017RBI SEBI MCA & Taxation Updates 30th January 2017
RBI SEBI MCA & Taxation Updates 30th January 2017
 
The new Companies Law 2013 (India) - Chapter 11: Appointment and Qualificatio...
The new Companies Law 2013 (India) - Chapter 11: Appointment and Qualificatio...The new Companies Law 2013 (India) - Chapter 11: Appointment and Qualificatio...
The new Companies Law 2013 (India) - Chapter 11: Appointment and Qualificatio...
 
Nca rules chapter22
Nca rules chapter22Nca rules chapter22
Nca rules chapter22
 
Alpha Legal updates-March to June, 2013
Alpha Legal updates-March to June, 2013Alpha Legal updates-March to June, 2013
Alpha Legal updates-March to June, 2013
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (19)

Pavan Sachdeva
Pavan SachdevaPavan Sachdeva
Pavan Sachdeva
 
MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
Bofors scam by skmr
Bofors scam by skmrBofors scam by skmr
Bofors scam by skmr
 
adarsh housing scam
adarsh housing scamadarsh housing scam
adarsh housing scam
 
Adarsh housing society
Adarsh housing societyAdarsh housing society
Adarsh housing society
 
Uti scam.
Uti scam.Uti scam.
Uti scam.
 
fodder scam
fodder scamfodder scam
fodder scam
 
Nsel Scam
Nsel ScamNsel Scam
Nsel Scam
 
UTI Scam
UTI ScamUTI Scam
UTI Scam
 
ADARSH SCAM PPT
ADARSH SCAM PPTADARSH SCAM PPT
ADARSH SCAM PPT
 
Nsel scam ppt
Nsel scam pptNsel scam ppt
Nsel scam ppt
 
Scams in india 2012-2013
Scams in india 2012-2013Scams in india 2012-2013
Scams in india 2012-2013
 
Stock Market Scam
Stock Market ScamStock Market Scam
Stock Market Scam
 
NSEL Scam - Corporate Governance PPT
NSEL Scam - Corporate Governance PPTNSEL Scam - Corporate Governance PPT
NSEL Scam - Corporate Governance PPT
 
Presentation on KETAN PAREKH Scam
Presentation on  KETAN PAREKH  ScamPresentation on  KETAN PAREKH  Scam
Presentation on KETAN PAREKH Scam
 
Harshad Mehta Scam
Harshad Mehta ScamHarshad Mehta Scam
Harshad Mehta Scam
 
presentation on scam
presentation on scampresentation on scam
presentation on scam
 
The Harshad Mehta Scam
The Harshad Mehta ScamThe Harshad Mehta Scam
The Harshad Mehta Scam
 
Top five(5) scam’s of india
Top five(5) scam’s of indiaTop five(5) scam’s of india
Top five(5) scam’s of india
 

Similar to Ms Shoes East Ltd

Relief For LLP Firms - Settlement Scheme 2020
Relief For LLP Firms - Settlement Scheme 2020Relief For LLP Firms - Settlement Scheme 2020
Relief For LLP Firms - Settlement Scheme 2020LexComply
 
Significant FCRA Amendments: What they are and How they affect you !!
Significant FCRA Amendments: What they are and How they affect you !!Significant FCRA Amendments: What they are and How they affect you !!
Significant FCRA Amendments: What they are and How they affect you !!Suhel Goel
 
Reassessment & Penny Stocks
Reassessment & Penny Stocks Reassessment & Penny Stocks
Reassessment & Penny Stocks CA. Pramod Jain
 
Challenges faced by cs in annual return filing
Challenges faced by cs in annual return filingChallenges faced by cs in annual return filing
Challenges faced by cs in annual return filingMuhammad Waqas
 
I need 3 paragraphs for each discussion which is a total of 6 para
I need 3 paragraphs for each discussion which is a total of 6 paraI need 3 paragraphs for each discussion which is a total of 6 para
I need 3 paragraphs for each discussion which is a total of 6 paraLizbethQuinonez813
 
Volume IX Issue 2 May
Volume IX Issue 2 MayVolume IX Issue 2 May
Volume IX Issue 2 MayAuthBridge
 
AuthBridge Newsletter Issue 2- Subject Your CXO's to Thorough Background Check
AuthBridge Newsletter Issue 2- Subject Your CXO's to Thorough Background CheckAuthBridge Newsletter Issue 2- Subject Your CXO's to Thorough Background Check
AuthBridge Newsletter Issue 2- Subject Your CXO's to Thorough Background CheckAuthBridge
 
Judgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
Judgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign ExchangeJudgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
Judgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign ExchangeGauravVarma27
 
Shareholders are against ftil nsel merger
Shareholders are against ftil nsel mergerShareholders are against ftil nsel merger
Shareholders are against ftil nsel mergerNeel Kumar
 
WRITTEN NOTES OF ARGUMENT.docx
WRITTEN NOTES OF ARGUMENT.docxWRITTEN NOTES OF ARGUMENT.docx
WRITTEN NOTES OF ARGUMENT.docxMohitChug
 
Demonitization & Penny Stocks
Demonitization & Penny StocksDemonitization & Penny Stocks
Demonitization & Penny StocksCA. Pramod Jain
 
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd.pdf
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd.pdfAdjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd.pdf
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd.pdfHindenburg Research
 
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. in the matter of A...
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. in the matter of A...Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. in the matter of A...
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. in the matter of A...Hindenburg Research
 
Compounding of offences under fema 1999
Compounding of offences under fema 1999Compounding of offences under fema 1999
Compounding of offences under fema 1999Sooraj Nandan
 
Apifiny Investor Presentation
Apifiny Investor PresentationApifiny Investor Presentation
Apifiny Investor PresentationMichael Fertman
 
How to register a venture capital fund in india
How to register a venture capital fund in indiaHow to register a venture capital fund in india
How to register a venture capital fund in indiabrijshakun
 

Similar to Ms Shoes East Ltd (20)

Ms shoes east
Ms shoes east Ms shoes east
Ms shoes east
 
MS Shoes East
MS Shoes East MS Shoes East
MS Shoes East
 
Relief For LLP Firms - Settlement Scheme 2020
Relief For LLP Firms - Settlement Scheme 2020Relief For LLP Firms - Settlement Scheme 2020
Relief For LLP Firms - Settlement Scheme 2020
 
Significant FCRA Amendments: What they are and How they affect you !!
Significant FCRA Amendments: What they are and How they affect you !!Significant FCRA Amendments: What they are and How they affect you !!
Significant FCRA Amendments: What they are and How they affect you !!
 
Reassessment & Penny Stocks
Reassessment & Penny Stocks Reassessment & Penny Stocks
Reassessment & Penny Stocks
 
Challenges faced by cs in annual return filing
Challenges faced by cs in annual return filingChallenges faced by cs in annual return filing
Challenges faced by cs in annual return filing
 
I need 3 paragraphs for each discussion which is a total of 6 para
I need 3 paragraphs for each discussion which is a total of 6 paraI need 3 paragraphs for each discussion which is a total of 6 para
I need 3 paragraphs for each discussion which is a total of 6 para
 
Volume IX Issue 2 May
Volume IX Issue 2 MayVolume IX Issue 2 May
Volume IX Issue 2 May
 
AuthBridge Newsletter Issue 2- Subject Your CXO's to Thorough Background Check
AuthBridge Newsletter Issue 2- Subject Your CXO's to Thorough Background CheckAuthBridge Newsletter Issue 2- Subject Your CXO's to Thorough Background Check
AuthBridge Newsletter Issue 2- Subject Your CXO's to Thorough Background Check
 
CURRICULUM VITAE
CURRICULUM VITAECURRICULUM VITAE
CURRICULUM VITAE
 
Judgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
Judgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign ExchangeJudgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
Judgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
 
Shareholders are against ftil nsel merger
Shareholders are against ftil nsel mergerShareholders are against ftil nsel merger
Shareholders are against ftil nsel merger
 
WRITTEN NOTES OF ARGUMENT.docx
WRITTEN NOTES OF ARGUMENT.docxWRITTEN NOTES OF ARGUMENT.docx
WRITTEN NOTES OF ARGUMENT.docx
 
Demonitization & Penny Stocks
Demonitization & Penny StocksDemonitization & Penny Stocks
Demonitization & Penny Stocks
 
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd.pdf
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd.pdfAdjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd.pdf
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd.pdf
 
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. in the matter of A...
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. in the matter of A...Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. in the matter of A...
Adjudication order against Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. in the matter of A...
 
Compounding of offences under fema 1999
Compounding of offences under fema 1999Compounding of offences under fema 1999
Compounding of offences under fema 1999
 
Apifiny Investor Presentation
Apifiny Investor PresentationApifiny Investor Presentation
Apifiny Investor Presentation
 
How to register a venture capital fund in india
How to register a venture capital fund in indiaHow to register a venture capital fund in india
How to register a venture capital fund in india
 
Resume
ResumeResume
Resume
 

More from Ms Shoes East Ltd (20)

MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
MS Shoes
MS ShoesMS Shoes
MS Shoes
 
MS SHOES | MS SHOES
MS SHOES | MS SHOESMS SHOES | MS SHOES
MS SHOES | MS SHOES
 
MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
MS Shoes
MS ShoesMS Shoes
MS Shoes
 
MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
MS Shoes
MS ShoesMS Shoes
MS Shoes
 
MS SHOES
MS SHOESMS SHOES
MS SHOES
 
Ms shoes
Ms shoes Ms shoes
Ms shoes
 
MS Shoes
MS ShoesMS Shoes
MS Shoes
 
MS Shoes
MS ShoesMS Shoes
MS Shoes
 
MS Shoes East
MS Shoes EastMS Shoes East
MS Shoes East
 
MS Shoes East
MS Shoes EastMS Shoes East
MS Shoes East
 
Ms shoes east ltd
Ms shoes east ltdMs shoes east ltd
Ms shoes east ltd
 
MS Shoes East Ltd
MS Shoes East LtdMS Shoes East Ltd
MS Shoes East Ltd
 

Recently uploaded

Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101 - Basics on Growth Marketing
Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101  - Basics on Growth MarketingTech Startup Growth Hacking 101  - Basics on Growth Marketing
Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101 - Basics on Growth MarketingShawn Pang
 
Regression analysis: Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
Regression analysis:  Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear RegressionRegression analysis:  Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
Regression analysis: Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear RegressionRavindra Nath Shukla
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...lizamodels9
 
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman LeechRE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman LeechNewman George Leech
 
Call Girls in Mehrauli Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Mehrauli Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Mehrauli Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Mehrauli Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝soniya singh
 
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service JamshedpurVIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service JamshedpurSuhani Kapoor
 
rishikeshgirls.in- Rishikesh call girl.pdf
rishikeshgirls.in- Rishikesh call girl.pdfrishikeshgirls.in- Rishikesh call girl.pdf
rishikeshgirls.in- Rishikesh call girl.pdfmuskan1121w
 
FULL ENJOY - 9953040155 Call Girls in Chhatarpur | Delhi
FULL ENJOY - 9953040155 Call Girls in Chhatarpur | DelhiFULL ENJOY - 9953040155 Call Girls in Chhatarpur | Delhi
FULL ENJOY - 9953040155 Call Girls in Chhatarpur | DelhiMalviyaNagarCallGirl
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfpollardmorgan
 
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...lizamodels9
 
0183760ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss00101011 (27).pdf
0183760ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss00101011 (27).pdf0183760ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss00101011 (27).pdf
0183760ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss00101011 (27).pdfRenandantas16
 
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.Aaiza Hassan
 
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Dipal Arora
 
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc.../:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...lizamodels9
 
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In.../:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...lizamodels9
 
(8264348440) 🔝 Call Girls In Keshav Puram 🔝 Delhi NCR
(8264348440) 🔝 Call Girls In Keshav Puram 🔝 Delhi NCR(8264348440) 🔝 Call Girls In Keshav Puram 🔝 Delhi NCR
(8264348440) 🔝 Call Girls In Keshav Puram 🔝 Delhi NCRsoniya singh
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...lizamodels9
 
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts ServiceVip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Serviceankitnayak356677
 
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for SuccessSales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for SuccessAggregage
 
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,noida100girls
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101 - Basics on Growth Marketing
Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101  - Basics on Growth MarketingTech Startup Growth Hacking 101  - Basics on Growth Marketing
Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101 - Basics on Growth Marketing
 
Regression analysis: Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
Regression analysis:  Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear RegressionRegression analysis:  Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
Regression analysis: Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
Lowrate Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Servi...
 
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman LeechRE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
 
Call Girls in Mehrauli Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Mehrauli Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Mehrauli Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Mehrauli Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
 
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service JamshedpurVIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
 
rishikeshgirls.in- Rishikesh call girl.pdf
rishikeshgirls.in- Rishikesh call girl.pdfrishikeshgirls.in- Rishikesh call girl.pdf
rishikeshgirls.in- Rishikesh call girl.pdf
 
FULL ENJOY - 9953040155 Call Girls in Chhatarpur | Delhi
FULL ENJOY - 9953040155 Call Girls in Chhatarpur | DelhiFULL ENJOY - 9953040155 Call Girls in Chhatarpur | Delhi
FULL ENJOY - 9953040155 Call Girls in Chhatarpur | Delhi
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
 
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
Call Girls In Connaught Place Delhi ❤️88604**77959_Russian 100% Genuine Escor...
 
0183760ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss00101011 (27).pdf
0183760ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss00101011 (27).pdf0183760ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss00101011 (27).pdf
0183760ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss00101011 (27).pdf
 
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
 
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
 
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc.../:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
/:Call Girls In Jaypee Siddharth - 5 Star Hotel New Delhi ➥9990211544 Top Esc...
 
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In.../:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
 
(8264348440) 🔝 Call Girls In Keshav Puram 🔝 Delhi NCR
(8264348440) 🔝 Call Girls In Keshav Puram 🔝 Delhi NCR(8264348440) 🔝 Call Girls In Keshav Puram 🔝 Delhi NCR
(8264348440) 🔝 Call Girls In Keshav Puram 🔝 Delhi NCR
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
 
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts ServiceVip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
Vip Female Escorts Noida 9711199171 Greater Noida Escorts Service
 
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for SuccessSales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
 
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
 

Ms Shoes East Ltd

  • 1. Sub: Deletion of data being outdated and inaccurate in the name of the company and its CMD Pavan Sachdeva.
  • 2.
  • 3. We would like to bring to your kind attention the following data loaded in google search engine:
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6. Justification for deletion of such information :-
  • 7. 1 Special Report India Today – April,1995
  • 8.
  • 9. The heading MS Shoes case :
  • 10. Pavan Sachdeva arrested, SEBI and Merchant Bankers come under the cloud. (copy enclosed as Annexure-1).
  • 11. Individuals have the right to be forgotten as held by EU Top Court.
  • 12. become outdated as well as inaccurate, irrelevant, no longer relevant, inadequate and excessive in relation to the purpose for which they were processed in the light of the time that has a elapsed.
  • 13. Deletion of such information does not amount to censorship in view of several changes/current information for last 20 years from the date of reporting .
  • 14. The CMD and the company has gone into several changes of the said allegations in the data provided by your company.
  • 15. The changes and the developments are as follows :
  • 16. It was wrongful arrest by CBI.
  • 17. The allegations in the FIR were completely wrong in law.
  • 18. mentioned in the report have been decreed in favour of the company as on 3.7.2010. The court has declared the cancellation as null & void and inoperative.
  • 19. closed on the closure report filed by CBI in Sept., 1998 and the closure report was accepted by the First Class Magistrate of Mumbai vide its order dated 30.9.1998.
  • 20. The criminal complaint of the company is pending before Court against the persons who filed a wrong FIR with ulterior motives motivated by the competitors of the company.
  • 21. crores public & right issue and for propping of the shares has no relevance in the view of the closure of the FIR which was reported in the newspapers but the same is not reflected in the data on Google, copy of the closure report is annexed as Annexure-II.
  • 22. The allegation in the report that there were co-conspirators does not stand any more as the FIR was closed as back as in Sept.,1998.
  • 23. The allegations that officials flouted number of guidelines to give monitory advantage to the company’s promoter also does not stand in view of the closure of the FIR in 1998.
  • 24. The allegations that SBI Caps gave false due diligence certificate stands closed on the closure of the FIR.
  • 25. the report that if issue is above Rs. 50 crores not more than 25% should be collected on application are completely wrong in view of the SEBI guidelines at the relevant time, in support the copy of SEBI regulations at the relevant time is annexed as Annexure-III.
  • 26. The allegations in the report the SEBI exempted from bringing in the promoters quota for Rs. 85.65 crores for the public issue is also are wrong reporting in the said report.
  • 27. right issue was subscribed is also wrong reporting as there was no SEBI guidelines at the relevant time to instruct the stock exchanges to stop the release of the proceeds since the proceeds are not with Delhi Stock Exchange but always remained with the banks as trustee of the investors.
  • 28. and other documents is also false in view of the fact that the prospectus was vetted by SEBI, Registrar of Companies and Regional Stock Exchange as well, however such allegations are reported from the FIR which have no relevance in view of the closure of the FIR in Sept., 1998.
  • 29. company to collect 50% subscription on application and exempted him from bringing in the promoters quota is also false in view of the SEBI guidelines and the relevant time.
  • 30. of shares of MS Shoes for the purpose of rigging the price to deceive the generally ignorant investors is also completely false as there was no rigging or no insider trading that has been found in the investigations by CBI.
  • 31. The allegations in the version of Sh. Y.P. Singh that he had “evidence of pay off” to SEBI officials to overlook were also false in view of the findings in investigations.
  • 32. High Court of Bombay as the entire allegations & investigations in the FIR has been closed since on the same allegations another complaint cannot be filed and its stand admitted by High Court of Bombay, the copy of the order is annexed as Annexure-IV.
  • 33. Sh. Y.P. Singh version as reported in the said report stands closed by his own investigations in the FIR.
  • 34. per the investigations of CBI which were closed in Sept., 1998, in regard to bridge loan it may be brought to your kind notice that they stand paid by the company and as such presently there are no debtors of the company neither any banks nor any institutions, in regard to the hotel project its stand decreed in favour of the company vide order dated 3.7.2010, copy of the order is annexed as Annexure-V.
  • 35. 2. Frontline – Volume 17, Issue 16, august 5 – 18, 2000.
  • 36.
  • 37. Controversy – The MS Shoes Affairs
  • 38. from FIR have no stand and is irrelevant information in the view of the said fact that the FIR was closed in Sept., 1998 besides in respect of these allegations in the report are not justified in view of the above details given in point no. 1.
  • 39. As reported that apparently the Govt. has got report from CBI months ago on the MS Shoes case is completely false in view of the closure of the FIR in Sept., 1998.
  • 40. In respect of Hudco also the report at present is completely irrelevant in view of the decree & judgment passed by the Court.
  • 41. irrelevant as well as inadequate besides that it is no longer relevant and that it is excessive in relation to the purpose for which they were processed in the light of the time that has a elapsed.
  • 42. The deletion of the said report does not amount censorship in view of the supported documents enclosed herewith.
  • 44.
  • 45. Company Profile by Sanjay Jhaveri, CFA • (copy enclosed as Annexure-3). The allegations that the company misrepresented the company shares price in its advertisement is a false information in view of the closures of such allegations and court orders which have been annexed herewith.
  • 46. The report has been reported in May, 2014 giving the false allegations in the company profile besides the fact that such allegations are outdated as well as inaccurate.
  • 47. The allegations that Bombay Stock Exchange threatened not to grant listing is also false information besides the fact that the case is of 1995.
  • 48. cost of the company is also false in view of the fact that the project was appraised by a premium institution Tourism Financial Corporation of India.
  • 49. company ultimately led into devolvement of the issue is also false as the issue was devolved because of under subscription within 60 days of the closing date of the issue.
  • 50. proceedings is also false in view of the closure report as well as the court order in Sept., 1998 besides the fact that the information provided is of the current year May, 2014.
  • 51. Shoes East Ltd., 5 NWA, Punjabi Bagh Extn., New Delhi 1-110026 is also false as all times since 1995 the company’s Registrar Mas Services Ltd.
  • 52. Jhaveri, CFA which are false should not be kept in data by google and in fact no further analyses of such persons should be allowed to be downloaded in the data.
  • 53. the underwriters and they have been decreed in favour of the company, one of the order passed is enclosed as Annexure-VI although there are almost 50 decrees passed against 50 underwriters amounting to more than Rs. 98 crores.
  • 54. The information which is false and if deleted would not amount to censorship.
  • 55. 4 Business Standard, Kolkata – 12.6.1998
  • 56.
  • 57. DRT Likely to Auction MS Shoes Properties.
  • 58. (copy enclosed as Annexure-4).
  • 59.
  • 60.
  • 62.
  • 63. Refund Allahabad Bank Rs. 21.49 crores, MS Shoes told. (copy enclosed as Annexure-5).
  • 64.
  • 65. The allegations that most of the project having failed to take off is of 1998 and the current situations are entirely different in view of the decree in favour of the company.
  • 66. Allahabad Bank is also irrelevant in view of the fact that entire amount has been paid to Allahabad Bank as back on 23.5.2009, copy of the letter from Allahabad Bank is annexed as Annexure-VII.
  • 67. fact that DRT proceedings have been closed as back as in July, 2009, the copy of the DRT order closing the proceedings is annexed as Annexure-VIII.
  • 68. the company has no relevance as presently there are no debtors of the company, the audited financial report of March, 2014 is annexed as Annexure-IX, the debtors were paid longtime back by the company
  • 69. Such report presently are invalid and have to be forgotten under the circumstances they have become outdated as well as inaccurate.
  • 70. in relation to the purpose for which they were processed in the light of the time that has a elapsed. In view of which such information is neither legitimate nor legal information and would not amount to censorship if it is deleted.
  • 71. by EU Top Court that involved in a debt recovery operations still continuous to appear on the online specially such data is existing long after the legal dispute has been resolved by the company.
  • 72. irrelevant and has no longer relevant in the light of the time that has elapsed besides the fact that the entire amount stands paid to Allahabad Bank as back as in year 2009, the relevant documents are already annexed.
  • 73. 5. Indian Express – 14.7.1997
  • 74.
  • 75. MS Shoes case finally comes for hearing
  • 76. (copy enclosed as Annexure-6).
  • 77. outdated in view of the fact that suit in respect of 5 star hotel land has been decreed in favour of the company and the judgment has been annexed herewith.
  • 78. Leela Hotels & Convention Ltd. (LHCL) is also outdated in view of the fact that Leela’s allotment had been cancelled by Hudco as back as in July, 1999.
  • 80.
  • 81. Statement showing cases wherein notices u/s 142 of Customs Act,1962 issued on or after 1.4.2003. (copy enclosed as Annexure-7).
  • 82. against the defaulters, the amounts have been shown in total approximately Rs. 16 crores is completely and outdated information since the show cause notices have been dropped, copy of the orders dropping the show cause notices are annexed as Annexure-X (Colly).
  • 83. since the company into 100% exports and as such modvat could have never been availed, the copy of the certificate issued by excise department is annexed as Annexure-XI.
  • 84. shown as nature of offence that we failed to fulfill condition of export obligation u/s 203/92 Cos. is completely wrong in view of the fact the conditions of the alleged section had been complied with by the company.
  • 85. initiating recovery action has been taken is also false in view of the fact that all the show cause notices stand dropped against the company and as such there is no recovery by the Central Revenue Department.
  • 86. The information is required to be deleted as it is outdated in view of the orders and the certificate annexed herewith.
  • 87. 7. Express India. Com –
  • 89.
  • 90. since long including the other group companies have also paid the entire amounts to the banks and at present there are no liabilities whatsoever of any of the group companies, the letters from the banks/financial institutions showing evidencing there are no liabilities towards them are annexed as Annexure- XII (colly) which included also of the group companies.
  • 91. The allegations that Bombay Stock Exchange threatened not to grant listing is also false information besides the fact that the case is of 1995.
  • 92. cost of the company is also false in view of the fact that the project was appraised by a premium institution Tourism Financial Corporation of India.
  • 93. company ultimately led into devolvement of the issue is also false as the issue was devolved because of under subscription within 60 days of the closing date of the issue.
  • 94. proceedings is also false in view of the closure report as well as the court order in Sept., 1998 besides the fact that the information provided is of the current year May, 2014.
  • 95.
  • 96. 8. A.P. Associate Press – 7.4.1995
  • 97.
  • 98. after scandal closes market (copy enclosed as Annexure-9). The allegations in the report that Pavan Sachdeva cheated the investors stands closed vide closure report of CBI as already justified above.
  • 99. was never involved into any purchase of shares from any stock exchange or any broker, thus the allegations of rigging the shares of the company are also false in the light of the fact that the CBI has closed the FIR.
  • 100. two officials of SBI Capital Markets and the allegations of these officials conniving with Pavan Sachdeva for financial gains is also irrelevant in the light of the fact that the FIR registered by CBI stands closed.
  • 101. Any allegations in respect of the Stock Brokers is not concerned with the company or Pavan Sachdeva.
  • 103. India Largest B2 Market Place.
  • 104.
  • 105. Shoes affair and MS Shoes has gone to the cleaners besides the fact is that all these reports pertain to April, 1995 which are more than 20 years old, there are all irrelevant, outdated and are also inaccurate besides that they are excessive in relation to the purpose for which they were processed and in the light of the time that has elapsed.
  • 106.
  • 107. 10 Citeman Network only business community knowledge base.
  • 108.
  • 109. Capital Market Scams by Sree Rama Rao on 1.7.2009. • (copy enclosed as Annexure-11). The allegation that March, 1995 another scam known as MS Shoes scam master mind by export, Pavan Sachdeva, rigged up price of shares, leading eventuality to a crash are completely baseless in view of the fact that such allegation have been reported from the FIR of CBI which stands closed since 1998 while this article is written in 2009. There are no allegation that subsist presently in respect of share prices alleged to be rigged besides it is a proved fact that the company nor Pavan Sachdeva rigged the prices of the company’s shares. The allegation that the market were closed for three days is baseless as the brokers did not default due to the company or Pavan Sachdeva. The shares were purchased by the brokers on certain vested interest and in any case such allegation do not stand proved against the company or Pavan Sachdeva in view of the closure report accepted by the Court as well as the stay granted by High Court in respect of complaint under the Companies Act filed by CBI in 1998, the closure and stay order has already been annexed as Annexure –II & IV.
  • 110. that has elapsed such reports should not be entertained even if written by Sree Rama Rao who has not reported the change facts of the case in view of which the said report is required to be corrected and till then should be deleted as it would not amount to censorship.
  • 111. 11 Business Standard, Kolkata. 21.4.1997 by Cherian Thomas
  • 112.
  • 113. 14.3.2007 and the awards have already been decided in favour of the company by the Arbitrator in June, 2012 which have been decreed in favour of the company, the copy of the order of High Court appointing the arbitrator is annexed as Annexure-XIII and copy of the decree passed by High has already been annexed as annexure – VI.
  • 114. irrelevant which is no longer relevant as well as it is excessive in relation to the purpose for which it was processed and in the light of time that has elapsed. In view of which such information would not amount to censorship if it is deleted.
  • 115. 12 The Financial Express posted online 27.2.2003 reported on 26.2.2003.
  • 116.
  • 117. IF War on Cor. Defaulters (copy enclosed as Annexure-13).
  • 118.
  • 119. of Delhi granted the stay since the FIR was not found to be correctly registered, however, the said FIR was quashed vide order dated 19.9.2005 is annexed as Annexure-XIV in view of which presently the said report is outdated since the amount stands paid to Indian Air Force . The information presently is outdated as well as inaccurate and the deletion of the same would not amount to censorship.
  • 120. 13 Rediff on the net business news. Copy right 1997 Rediff On the Net.
  • 121.
  • 122. CBI Targets SBI, SEBI officials in MS Shoes Scam. (copy enclosed as Annexure-14).
  • 123. would be main accused are irrelevant in view of the fact that no prosecution had been filed by CBI, rather closure report was filed in Sept., 1998 and court had accepted the closure report, the documents in respect of the closure have been annexed as Annexure -II & IV.
  • 124. of the applications of the subscription and that SEBI official did not take any precaution nor did not they instruct Delhi Stock Exchange not to release the public issue funds are completely irrelevant and outdated in view of the fact that such allegations were in the FIR and they have been closed since Sept., 1998.
  • 125. prop up his shares prices also have no substance and outdated in view of the fact that the FIR containing such allegations has been closed since Sept., 1998 and the complaint under Companies Act also stand stayed by High Court of Mumbai since 2009.
  • 126. The said report is outdated as well as irrelevant and the deletion of the same will not amount to censorship.
  • 127. 14 expressindia.indian express.com – 11.9.1998. (copy enclosed as Annexure-15).
  • 128.
  • 129. CBI filed complaint in MS Shoes case
  • 130. allegation of the complaint as reported in the report do not persists in view of the fact that the complaint is of 1998 and in the petition filed before High Court of Bombay, the court was appraised of the false allegations due to which petition was admitted and stands stayed since 2009 in view of which the said report is no subsist and outdated.
  • 131. 15 eBook – Pearson Education India
  • 132.
  • 133. The Indian Financial System : Markets, Institutions and Services By Bharati V. Pathak
  • 134. company nor Pavan Sachdeva rigged the prices of the company’s shares. The allegation that the market were closed for three days is baseless as the brokers did not default due to the company or Pavan Sachdeva. The shares were purchased by the brokers on certain vested interest and in any case such allegation do not stand proved against the company or Pavan Sachdeva in view of the closure report accepted by the Court as well as the stay granted by High
  • 135.
  • 136. of the case in view of which the said report is required to be corrected and till then should be deleted as it would not amount to censorship. Further that such allegations have been carried over from one of the newspaper report/FIR which has been closed by CBI as well as the Court in view of which such allegations are outdated as well as irrelevant and such the deletion of the same would not amount to censorship.
  • 138.
  • 139. Boost Your Professional Career By S.K. Bhatia
  • 140.
  • 141. and such allegations have been carried over from some of the newspaper report/FIR which stands closed and the newspaper reports are outdated in view of the fact that the company has not cheated any of the investors which has been supported by the closure of the FIR in view of which such allegations are outdated as well as irrelevant and such the deletion of the same would not amount to censorship.
  • 143.
  • 144. Corporate Governance : Principles, Policies and Practices By A.C. Fernando
  • 145.
  • 146. Secondary Markets Reforms (copy enclosed as Annexure-18).
  • 147.
  • 148. quotations and that MS Shoes is an example of market rigging in March , 2001 is completely false as the company never rigged the prices as being alleged besides the facts is that company’s shares were not traded even in 2001 in view of which the said report is completely false on the face of it which needs to be considered to be deleted as it would not amount to censorship at all.
  • 149.
  • 151.
  • 152. Business Ethics: An Indian Perspective By A.C. Fernando
  • 153.
  • 154. allegations do not stand once the allegations in the FIR stands closed besides the fact that the company or Pavan Sachdeva was never involved in insider trading nor did purchase any shares as being alleged in the report. Besides the fact is that the said report has no relevance due to elapse of time that they were reported in 1995 besides the fact is that such report and data is irrelevant and is no longer relevant as well as it is outdated and inaccurate.
  • 156.
  • 157. India Business Yearbook2009 By Career Launcher India Ltd.
  • 158.
  • 160. subscribe to right issue entitlement of the promoters amounting to Rs. 1.3 billion which caused panic in the stock market have no relevance in view of the fact that the said allegations stand closed by CBI in Sept., 1998 in view of which the said report is outdated, irrelevant as well as excessive in relation to the purpose in the light of the time that as elapsed and such deletion would not cause any censorship.
  • 161.
  • 162.
  • 163. 1 MS Shoes from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
  • 164. subscription and the issue was devolved on the underwriters who did not pay within 60 days of the closure of the issue due to which the entire amount collected from the investors was refunded by a resolutions passed by the company 22.4.1995, the letter received from SBI Market Ltd. in response to letter of SEBI as well as the resolution passed by the company are annexed as Annexure. I & II. Further the certificate issued by the Registrar mailing all the refund is annexed as
  • 165.
  • 166. 1.5.2012 is also wrong since no such money was raised from the investors as the entire amount had to be refunded since the issue was devolved on the underwriters and remained undersubscribed till the 60th day of the closure of the issue and as per terms of prospectus the said amount was refunded within the stipulated time by passing a resolution on 22.4.1995. In respect of the alleged borrowing from banks & financial institutions, the company borrowed the
  • 167.
  • 168. relevance in view of the fact that all such allegations stand closed since Sept., 1998. Further that the company has survived very well and has no complaints of any of the shareholders and as reported that the company is defunct (2003) is also completely wrong in view of the fact that the company has been abiding by all the laws of country and has been filing its returns with ROC regularly.
  • 169.
  • 170. such the allegation being alleged in the report in respect Prevention of Corruption Act have no relevance at present since the allegations are outdated and inaccurate besides being irrelevant and excessive in relation to the purpose for which they were processed and in the light of the time that has elapsed since the closure of the FIR.
  • 171.
  • 172. has been made on report from Nirmala Ganpati June 6, 2003 the Indian Express, retrieved 1.5.2012 is completely false in view of the fact that the FIR was closed in Sept., 1998 and the closure report was accepted by the court on 30.9.1998, the same is annexed as Annexure-IV.
  • 173. and copy of the FIR has been quashed is annexed as Annexure-VI in view of which the said report is irrelevant and outdated and any retrieval on 1.5.2012 do not support the actual facts besides the said report is reported to be modified on 19.4.2014 which does not have proper reports of the current situations accept it has been retrieved from the old reports which are outdated in view of the changes that have not been reported and as such the current report modified on 19.4.2014
  • 174. company filed its reference was registered with BIFR on 13.6.2002, coy of the same is annexed as Annexure-VII it was mandatory to go to BIFR as net worth of the company had eroded and presently the rehabilitation scheme submitted by the company to the Operating Agency and BIFR has been approved vide order dated 25.10.2013 of BIFR, copy of the order is annexed as Annexure-VIII.
  • 175. devolvement of the issue and the company also has a decree against Union of India as well as Hudco for wrongfully forfeiting the amount of Rs. 68.68 crores in respect of its 5 star hotel projects, the copy of the decree is annexed as Annexure-IX.