SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 21
©2014 by the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern
University. This case was prepared by Professor Derek D.
Rucker and
Mauricio O’Connell ’08. All facts and images presented in this
case were obtained through communications with a
representative
from Procter & Gamble on the Old Spice team. Cases are
developed solely as the basis for class discussion. Cases are not
intended to
serve as endorsements, sources of primary data, or illustrations
of effective or ineffective management. To order copies or
request
permission to reproduce materials, call 800-545-7685(or 617-
783-7600 outside the United States or Canada) or e-mail
[email protected] No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet,
or
transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the
permission of
Kellogg Case Publishing.
DEREK D. RUCKER AND MAURICIO O’CONNELL ’08
KEL786
Old Spice:
Repeating Success in the Face of Competitive Threat
Planning season for fiscal year 2009–2010 had come for the
members of the Old Spice brand
team, and they knew another great campaign was needed to
drive the growth of their beloved
brand. The team had demonstrated the power of advertising
after saving the Glacial Falls line in
the previous fiscal year by repositioning the scent as Swagger
and speaking to the consumers’
desire for confidence. The revitalized campaign was successful
not only because it moved the
scent from the worst-performing to one of the top three in the
portfolio but also because the
advertising created a “halo effect”1 for the rest of the portfolio,
resulting in growth for the entire
Old Spice brand.
The Swagger campaign had also been honored with external
awards for both its creativity
(2009 Silver Cyber Cannes Award) and its effectiveness (2010
Silver Effie Award). The Old
Spice brand had always been seen as a bit of a rebellious child
within the Procter & Gamble
(P&G) portfolio, with less conventional advertising motifs and
buying media through agency as
opposed to utilizing P&G’s bulk buys. P&G allowed the brand
to behave differently because Old
Spice constituted only about 1 percent of P&G’s $85 billion
portfolio. With its success, however,
the rebellious child had begun to catch the attention of other
brands within P&G. In just a few
years, the Old Spice repositioning of Glacial Falls had become
the model within the company for
a successful turnaround. Old Spice also served as a strong
reminder that a great advertising
strategy could have powerful effects on sales without any
sensory change in the product
experience.
Following their recent success, the Old Spice team members had
set a high bar for
themselves; they wanted to challenge themselves to do
something bigger and to prove they had
not simply stumbled onto the Swagger success. They wanted to
be seen not as one-hit wonders
but as members of a group that had a knack for creating sound
strategy that one of their key
creative partners, the advertising agency Wieden+Kennedy,
could then execute.
Wieden+Kennedy had built great brands such as Nike and Coca-
Cola, and now could count Old
Spice as another success story.
1 A halo effect in advertising refers to the growth of a non-
advertised product that results from its affiliation with an
advertised
product. Halo effects occur when a positive reaction to an
advertisement increases consumers’ awareness of, or their
general attitude
toward, other affiliated products, leading them to buy products
not advertised. For example, although Swagger was the specific
scent
advertised in 2008–2009, other Old Spice scents not advertised
(e.g., After Hours, Showtime, Aqua Reef) also saw growth
attributed
to Swagger’s advertising.
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786
2 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
The core Old Spice brand team comprised brand manager James
Moorhead and his four
assistant brand managers: George Felix, Jim Urbaitis, Shanan
Sabin, and Mauricio O’Connell.
For O’Connell, a recent graduate of the Kellogg School of
Management, his first few years as an
assistant brand manager had been an unbelievable ride. He had
worked on the Swagger launch
and was proud to claim part of the responsibility for its success.
O’Connell also shared the
enthusiasm of his brand team to do something bigger and better.
He knew that as a brand manager
he could not afford to rest on his laurels; to be successful he
would have to best his previous
results. Swagger had been so successful, however, that the next
campaign would have no easy
hurdle to clear. Expectations were high for the Old Spice team,
which already had begun to work
together to figure out the next “Big Idea.” The following were
the options the team was
considering.
Continue to Promote Swagger
Previously the Old Spice team had put the entire force of its
advertising budget behind
Swagger. At the time, others in P&G thought the strategy risky,
as the team had provided no
advertising support for the overall Old Spice name in a more
than a year. The gamble ended up
paying off, as sales numbers had attested to the growth of
Swagger: sales were up 175 percent
and volume was up 270 percent. And, despite not supporting the
broader brand, sales of other Old
Spice products had continued to grow steadily. These outcomes
suggested that an opportunity
existed to continue to grow and secure Swagger’s place in
consumers’ hearts and minds.
Indeed, the Old Spice team thought it would be a shame if
Swagger’s growth stalled because
of the potentially unnecessary and premature pulling of
advertising to support the broader brand.
Thus, one option being considered by the brand team was to
continue to fuel the behemoth that
the Swagger scent had become. However, Wieden+Kennedy was
already ready to move onto a
new project and to do something different with the brand.
Wieden+Kennedy had already
developed three different communication messages for the
Swagger scent: Urlacher and LL Cool
J, Tony Stewart, and Swaggerize Your Wallet. The issue was
whether an extended campaign for
Swagger could be launched to keep the new flagship scent ahead
of the competition or whether
the campaign had reached its zenith and a switch in strategy was
required.
Rebrand or Promote Another Scent
The power of sound advertising and strategy to change brand
perception and increase sales
led O’Connell, Felix, Urbaitis, Sabin, and Moorhead to consider
another advertising effort that
would either rebrand or promote another scent in their portfolio.
To accomplish such a task, the
team could take an approach similar to that of the rebranding of
Glacial Falls as Swagger. The
team needed first to identify a product that might benefit from
rebranding or advertising. Then the
team would need to target the consumer and find a consumer
insight to feed into the positioning.
The Old Spice team was confident that if it could accomplish
these objectives, it could deliver a
creative brief that would allow Wieden+Kennedy to execute
another responsive—or even
stunning—advertising campaign.
A possible target for rebranding or additional advertising was
the scent Showtime, another
member of the Red Zone portfolio that Swagger belonged to.
Although Swagger had helped fuel
growth among other scents, such as Aqua Reef and After Hours,
Showtime had become the
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
KEL786 OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 3
weakest-performing Red Zone scent, accounting for only 8
percent of total sales in the portfolio
(see Exhibit 1). For example, the Showtime 3.25-oz deodorant
accounted for only about $1
million in sales, compared with more than $6 million for the
Swagger deodorant of the same size.
Showtime, as with Glacial Falls, had never had its own
dedicated advertising campaign. An
opportunity therefore existed to build original advertising
around a novel consumer insight.
The Old Spice team believed Showtime was a good candidate
for an advertising campaign.
At issue was whether the team should rebrand or promote the
existing scent. The brand team also
had to consider whom to target and what insight to offer. Most
important, the brand team did not
want to spend money merely to cannibalize the success it had
had with the younger male target
for Swagger. The team therefore would likely need to select a
new psychographic or demographic
target. Once the target was in place, O’Connell and his team
would have to discern a consumer
insight the brand could target. The team liked the idea of taking
more of the young male target,
which suggested adopting a different insight. Whereas Swagger
had succeeded in using the
insight of confidence, Showtime would be most powerful if it
had a different insight and could
speak to another unmet psychological need of consumers.
Although the brand team had not yet
chiseled out a specific message, it nonetheless was excited
about Showtime. The brand team
believed the scent name already carried with it some paths to
positioning: The word Showtime
could mean the consumer was ready for action. Indeed,
O’Connell saw an opportunity to promote
Showtime via Old Spice’s NASCAR affiliation (see Exhibit 2
for a mock-up).
Back to the Umbrella Brand
The brand team also discussed the possibility of advertising the
overall brand name, or the
“umbrella brand,” rather than focusing on a specific scent.
Although advertising Swagger had
achieved a halo effect, the Old Spice team was not sure a
continued focus on a single scent was
the best way to support the entire portfolio. Focusing on the
umbrella brand meant the advertising
would highlight the Old Spice name and the associations with
that name, as opposed to fostering
specific associations with a particular scent. The goal would be
to keep consumers aware of the
overall brand but also to build equity around the portfolio that
ideally would be applied to the
various scents associated with Old Spice.
If the brand team decided to advertise the umbrella brand, it
would have to think about a
message that would appeal to a larger group of users who
represented the brand’s persona. The
team had tried such an approach with Wieden+Kennedy before,
by associating the brand with sex
appeal and a retro look. This effort had not proved anywhere
near as successful as the Swagger
campaign, which made the team question returning to this
position. In addition, the Old Spice
brand had a history of being viewed as helping men on their
journey through manhood. Indeed,
early campaigns for the brand, before the partnership with
Wieden+Kennedy, had been all about
“manliness.” The team could return to this equity—but if it did
so, it would need to figure out a
means to represent masculinity in a modern way that did not
push the brand too far into the
perception of being only for “old guys.” Alternatively, the
brand team could come up with
another positioning for the umbrella brand.
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786
4 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
An Emphasis on Body Wash
Another option floated by the Old Spice brand team was a focus
on body wash. Swagger
advertising had focused largely, though not exclusively, on
deodorant, but the liquid body wash
category had shown significant growth. From 2003 to 2009, that
market had grown from $480
million to $756 million nationally, passing bar soap as the
preferred means of personal cleansing.
During this time, the sales of bar soap fell 40 percent. The
insight behind this growth came from
usage habits. Men used body wash made for women because it
was there in the shower, leading
to a decline in soap usage. Perhaps more important, the body
wash category also was growing fast
because younger generations of men had grown up with liquid
soap rather than bar soap. An even
bigger catalyst for growth, though, was gender. As brands
prompted a difference between men’s
and women’s products, households began supplementing their
women’s body wash with an
additional purchase of men’s body wash, resulting in the
expansion of the men’s body wash
category.
Indeed, with body wash nearly saturated in the women’s market
by 2003, most of the growth
could be attributed directly to men replacing their bar soap with
body wash. Specifically, 58
percent of men between the ages of 18 and 34 reported using
body wash; 50 percent of men
between the ages of 35 and 54 used body wash; and 42 percent
of men ages 55+ used body wash.
This growth in the body wash category had not gone unnoticed
by P&G or its competitors. Both
P&G and Unilever had increased their advertising expenditures
in this category at the expense of
men’s deodorant advertising, even though the deodorant
category attracted three times the dollar
volume of body wash. This allocation reflected the belief that
deodorants, for the most part, had
fully penetrated the market.
The importance of body wash and its growth led O’Connell and
the Old Spice team to
consider the possibility of shifting their own advertising to
focus primarily on body wash. The
team noted that if this was the objective, it might consider
sticking with the Swagger campaign or
doing this as part of prompting Showtime. A concern with this
advertising shift was that body
wash represented only about 20 percent of Old Spice sales.
Thus, this strategy carried with it the
risk of spending advertising resources on a smaller part of the
total business. The Old Spice team
was well aware of this tradeoff, which only made the decision
harder.
Dove for Men’s Bold Announcement: The Super Bowl Buy
The Old Spice team’s discussion of its possibilities for the next
fiscal year was temporarily
disrupted by news of a bold move from competitor Unilever,
which announced that its Dove for
Men (DFM) line would make its U.S. advertising debut in
February 2010 with a focus on body
wash. The brand’s entry raised concerns because Dove had a
loyal legion of female fans and
significant equity in moisturizing. Furthermore, DFM had
announced plans to advertise during
the Super Bowl, which had a massive reach of more than 100
million consumers. Furthermore,
these consumers were not merely passively exposed to Super
Bowl advertising; they actively
engaged with the advertising, often talking about it the day after
the game aired.
In addition, recent advancements in technology had only
increased the importance of
television advertising, especially during the Super Bowl.
Technology meant that Super Bowl
advertising was no longer something consumers saw once.
Consumers now actively searched for
Super Bowl advertising online to watch ads again, send links to
their friends, or post favorite
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
KEL786 OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 5
spots using social media venues such as YouTube. Consumers
actively wanted to know what the
best and worst spots of the Super Bowl had been, and the best
and worst Super Bowl advertising
often received a significant amount of earned media via
coverage online, in newspapers, and on
news reports. Super Bowl advertising, to put it bluntly, was a
massive hammer when it came to
reaching consumers.
The Old Spice brand team thought it had a strong sense of what
was coming from DFM. The
campaign would focus on body wash, given its growing
importance, and would be aggressive in
multiple venues: Super Bowl advertising, in-store advertising,
and promotions (see Exhibit 3). In
fact, as part of the sixty-second, approximately $7 million Super
Bowl buy, DFM would spend
more on its one-month launch than Old Spice spent on its
category in a year. DFM was also
known for testing its advertising globally, perfecting it, and
then transplanting it into larger
markets such as the United States, Brazil, and China—a strategy
referred to by some in the
business as “test and learn.” The Old Spice brand team already
had seen executions in Italy for
DFM that represented the general theme of its upcoming
campaign. Although it was tempting to
disregard Dove because the brand was too “feminine” to attract
male users, the Old Spice team
knew that women made more than 60 percent of the purchases
of men’s body wash. Indeed, the
Old Spice team speculated that DFM’s consumer targeting
strategy was actually quite sensible:
target the man, but facilitate the purchasers—women—to buy
the product.
The Old Spice team knew that along with the advertising, DFM
would use promotion to
acquire trial (e.g., buy one Dove body wash for women and get
a free Dove for Men body wash).
Dove could capitalize on its equity with and loyalty from
women. As a result of this equity, it
seemed possible for the Dove brand to convince its core
consumers to buy the product for their
men. With a big enough media spend, a sound strategy, and
good creative, DFM might succeed
with men in the United States. And, although some brands
naively held the belief that Super Bowl
advertising might not be the right venue in which to target
women, the Old Spice team knew
better. The Super Bowl was a venue for reaching both men and
women, with the audience
consisting roughly of 56 percent men and 44 percent women.
O’Connell and his colleagues needed to consider whether
DFM’s launch required them to
respond with adjustments to their own advertising strategy. At
issue was whether the Old Spice
team needed to change its target or positioning in response to
the competitive launch in men’s
personal care. The Old Spice team needed to further consider
whether to pay the heavy entry cost
to the Super Bowl, which would be a first for the brand, and a
rarity for P&G as a company.
O’Connell knew that a response to competition must be taken
seriously. At Kellogg he had
learned that engaging in a positioning battle one could not win
could be a disaster for a brand.
And he knew that DFM had the right people and resources to
engage in a large media spend,
sound positioning, and clever creative.
Challenges and Opportunities
All of the information on the table led the Old Spice brand team
to raise several issues for
consideration. First, the team had to decide where to focus its
advertising. Second, the team had
to decide what position would accompany its strategy. Finally,
it had to decide on a media
strategy. Linked to each of these decisions was the looming
entry of DFM in the Super Bowl. The
Old Spice team had to consider how that entry affected its
response and decisions to each of these
issues. The nature of each of these decisions is outlined below.
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786
6 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
Advertising Strategy: Choice of Product
The brand team saw little reason not to advertise, but it had to
consider for which of the
brand’s products advertising made the most sense. Specifically,
the team had to decide whether
to:
rella brand
another scent, or on the
umbrella brand
Advertising Strategy: Positioning
Regardless of what product the Old Spice team chose to
advertise, the team needed to make a
decision about how to position the brand. In making a
positioning choice, the brand team had to
consider whether to address DFM’s entry. One thing the Old
Spice team did not want to do was
position itself for direct product comparisons with DFM.
Although DFM had been known in the
past to invoke comparison claims with competitors’ brands,
P&G did not like the philosophy of
singling out a particular brand. Indeed, inviting too much overt
comparison had the danger of
confusing the consumer and ultimately undermining brand
growth. The question was, then, what
positioning should the brand use, and should it respond to
defend itself against DFM’s entry?
The brand team also had to consider the degree of expertise
Wieden+Kennedy had with
respect to broadening beyond the male target. The agency knew
the male consumer mind well,
and indeed, all its advertising with Old Spice had been focused
on that mindset. The Old Spice
team wondered, to a certain degree, whether the agency had the
right knack for developing a
creative strategy meant to embrace a target beyond its core male
consumer.
Media Choice
Finally, the team mulled over the media choices. The brand had
originally launched on
television, but it was coming off a very successful social media
effort, “Swaggerize Your
Wallet,” that had grown sales by an approximate 55 percent
above the traditional media efforts.
Moreover, the social media effort was extremely affordable
compared with using television. At
the same time, the brand team was not as confident that it could
get both men and women in the
same space with social media efforts. Would the two groups be
consuming social media together
and in the same channels? Also on the table was whether the
brand should pay the heavy ante to
advertise in the Super Bowl to be present and offer a
countervailing force to DFM’s planned
appearance.
The Super Bowl decision weighed especially heavy on the brand
team. A Super Bowl
placement would give Old Spice the kind of broad reach to male
and female consumers that was
impossible to duplicate with a single insertion in other media
vehicles. The Super Bowl was also
a way to be in the same space as the competition without
directly calling out the other brand. The
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
KEL786 OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 7
team knew it could get approval for the spot, but the thirty-
second appearance would cost an
estimated $3.4 million. Even for successful veterans,
committing that much money to a single
advertising buy was daunting. And the entire team felt that a
spot could be aired only if it were
“Super Bowl–worthy.”
Conclusion
O’Connell and the Old Spice team pondered the task before
them. The success of the
Swagger campaign had brought them glory but had also created
a high hurdle to clear. Now they
had been given the added challenge of having to decide whether
to devote further time and effort
to respond to a competitive threat. Of course, O’Connell
realized the situation he faced revealed
an inherent fact of marketing and advertising: Marketing was
not just about what your brand did;
it was also about properly understanding and responding to the
movements of the competition.
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786
8 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
Swagger
39%
Aqua Reef
27%
After Hours
26%
Showtime
8%
Exhibit 1: Performance in the Red Zone Line
Note: Percentages reflect the approximate dollar share of each
scent contributed in 2009.
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
KEL786 OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 9
Exhibit 2: Mock-Up for Showtime Advertising with NASCAR
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786
10 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
Exhibit 3: Dove for Men Launch Advertising
SUPER BOWL
Note: The Dove for Men Super Bowl spot can be viewed here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-Lc9Mhi9l0.
IN-STORE ADVERTISING PROMOTIONS
For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in
Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE
OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
Advertising Strategy Case 1 Old Spice: Individual Assignment
2-page summary of the case reading in your own words which
includes:
Brief summary of the key background information of the
case
Key problems and opportunities the brand needed to address
What is Old Spice’s equity and why was it an important part of
the brand’s thinking?
Describe the halo effect and its importance.
Summary of pros and cons of options
What would you recommend of all the options and why?
-include your rationale on whether to feature body wash
and to do comparative advertising

More Related Content

Similar to ©2014 by the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern .docx

CB_Sec B_FT153107_Horlicks
CB_Sec B_FT153107_HorlicksCB_Sec B_FT153107_Horlicks
CB_Sec B_FT153107_Horlicks
Sumit Arora
 
Brand Driven CEO - Embedding Brand into Business Strategy_Dec 2016_ PRINT FINAL
Brand Driven CEO - Embedding Brand into Business Strategy_Dec 2016_ PRINT FINALBrand Driven CEO - Embedding Brand into Business Strategy_Dec 2016_ PRINT FINAL
Brand Driven CEO - Embedding Brand into Business Strategy_Dec 2016_ PRINT FINAL
Matthew Kelly
 

Similar to ©2014 by the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern .docx (20)

Procter and gamble marketing capabilities
Procter and gamble  marketing capabilitiesProcter and gamble  marketing capabilities
Procter and gamble marketing capabilities
 
P&G- Marketing Capabilities-Harvard Business School Case study
P&G- Marketing Capabilities-Harvard Business School Case studyP&G- Marketing Capabilities-Harvard Business School Case study
P&G- Marketing Capabilities-Harvard Business School Case study
 
P&G marketing capabilities
P&G marketing capabilitiesP&G marketing capabilities
P&G marketing capabilities
 
Preserve the luxury or extend the Brand
Preserve the luxury or extend the Brand Preserve the luxury or extend the Brand
Preserve the luxury or extend the Brand
 
P&G marketing capabilities:HBR case
P&G marketing capabilities:HBR caseP&G marketing capabilities:HBR case
P&G marketing capabilities:HBR case
 
P&G: Marketing Capabilities, HBR Case Study
P&G: Marketing Capabilities, HBR Case StudyP&G: Marketing Capabilities, HBR Case Study
P&G: Marketing Capabilities, HBR Case Study
 
Celebrity endorsement , Re-positioning and Brand Extension
Celebrity endorsement , Re-positioning and Brand Extension Celebrity endorsement , Re-positioning and Brand Extension
Celebrity endorsement , Re-positioning and Brand Extension
 
P&G case study analysis
P&G case study analysisP&G case study analysis
P&G case study analysis
 
Case method
Case methodCase method
Case method
 
Procter & Gamble(P&G)
Procter & Gamble(P&G)Procter & Gamble(P&G)
Procter & Gamble(P&G)
 
Procter& Gamble: Harvard Marketing Case Study Analysis
Procter& Gamble: Harvard Marketing Case Study AnalysisProcter& Gamble: Harvard Marketing Case Study Analysis
Procter& Gamble: Harvard Marketing Case Study Analysis
 
Colgate
ColgateColgate
Colgate
 
Rebranding: The Winners and Losers
Rebranding: The Winners and LosersRebranding: The Winners and Losers
Rebranding: The Winners and Losers
 
Old spice presentation
Old spice presentationOld spice presentation
Old spice presentation
 
P&G : Marketing Capabilities
P&G : Marketing CapabilitiesP&G : Marketing Capabilities
P&G : Marketing Capabilities
 
CB_Sec B_FT153107_Horlicks
CB_Sec B_FT153107_HorlicksCB_Sec B_FT153107_Horlicks
CB_Sec B_FT153107_Horlicks
 
Winning strategy-By.Dr. Mahboob Khan
Winning strategy-By.Dr. Mahboob Khan Winning strategy-By.Dr. Mahboob Khan
Winning strategy-By.Dr. Mahboob Khan
 
P&G - A Marketing Pioneer
P&G - A Marketing PioneerP&G - A Marketing Pioneer
P&G - A Marketing Pioneer
 
Brand Driven CEO - Embedding Brand into Business Strategy_Dec 2016_ PRINT FINAL
Brand Driven CEO - Embedding Brand into Business Strategy_Dec 2016_ PRINT FINALBrand Driven CEO - Embedding Brand into Business Strategy_Dec 2016_ PRINT FINAL
Brand Driven CEO - Embedding Brand into Business Strategy_Dec 2016_ PRINT FINAL
 
Defining Brand Identity
Defining Brand IdentityDefining Brand Identity
Defining Brand Identity
 

More from oswald1horne84988

1 Network Analysis and Design This assignment is.docx
1  Network Analysis and Design  This assignment is.docx1  Network Analysis and Design  This assignment is.docx
1 Network Analysis and Design This assignment is.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Name _____________________________ MTH129 Fall .docx
1  Name  _____________________________ MTH129 Fall .docx1  Name  _____________________________ MTH129 Fall .docx
1 Name _____________________________ MTH129 Fall .docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Lab 8 -Ballistic Pendulum Since you will be desig.docx
1  Lab 8 -Ballistic Pendulum Since you will be desig.docx1  Lab 8 -Ballistic Pendulum Since you will be desig.docx
1 Lab 8 -Ballistic Pendulum Since you will be desig.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 I Samuel 8-10 Israel Asks for a King 8 When S.docx
1  I Samuel 8-10 Israel Asks for a King 8 When S.docx1  I Samuel 8-10 Israel Asks for a King 8 When S.docx
1 I Samuel 8-10 Israel Asks for a King 8 When S.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Journal Entry #9 What principle did you select .docx
1  Journal Entry #9 What principle did you select .docx1  Journal Entry #9 What principle did you select .docx
1 Journal Entry #9 What principle did you select .docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 HCA 448 Case 2 for 10042018 Recently, a pat.docx
1  HCA 448 Case 2 for 10042018 Recently, a pat.docx1  HCA 448 Case 2 for 10042018 Recently, a pat.docx
1 HCA 448 Case 2 for 10042018 Recently, a pat.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Chapter 2 Understanding Rhetoric Goal To re.docx
1  Chapter 2 Understanding Rhetoric  Goal To re.docx1  Chapter 2 Understanding Rhetoric  Goal To re.docx
1 Chapter 2 Understanding Rhetoric Goal To re.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 HC2091 Finance for Business Trimester 2 2.docx
1  HC2091 Finance for Business      Trimester 2 2.docx1  HC2091 Finance for Business      Trimester 2 2.docx
1 HC2091 Finance for Business Trimester 2 2.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 ECE 175 Computer Programming for Engineering Applica.docx
1  ECE 175 Computer Programming for Engineering Applica.docx1  ECE 175 Computer Programming for Engineering Applica.docx
1 ECE 175 Computer Programming for Engineering Applica.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Cinemark Holdings Inc. Simulated ERM Program .docx
1  Cinemark Holdings Inc. Simulated ERM Program  .docx1  Cinemark Holdings Inc. Simulated ERM Program  .docx
1 Cinemark Holdings Inc. Simulated ERM Program .docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Figure 1 Picture of Richard Selzer Richard Selz.docx
1  Figure 1 Picture of Richard Selzer Richard Selz.docx1  Figure 1 Picture of Richard Selzer Richard Selz.docx
1 Figure 1 Picture of Richard Selzer Richard Selz.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Films on Africa 1. A star () next to a film i.docx
1  Films on Africa  1. A star () next to a film i.docx1  Films on Africa  1. A star () next to a film i.docx
1 Films on Africa 1. A star () next to a film i.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Contemporary Approaches in Management of Risk in .docx
1  Contemporary Approaches in Management of Risk in .docx1  Contemporary Approaches in Management of Risk in .docx
1 Contemporary Approaches in Management of Risk in .docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Assignment front Sheet Qualification Unit n.docx
1  Assignment front Sheet   Qualification Unit n.docx1  Assignment front Sheet   Qualification Unit n.docx
1 Assignment front Sheet Qualification Unit n.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 BBS300 Empirical Research Methods for Business .docx
1  BBS300 Empirical  Research  Methods  for  Business .docx1  BBS300 Empirical  Research  Methods  for  Business .docx
1 BBS300 Empirical Research Methods for Business .docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 ASSIGNMENT 7 C – MERGING DATA FILES IN STATA Do.docx
1  ASSIGNMENT 7 C – MERGING DATA FILES IN STATA Do.docx1  ASSIGNMENT 7 C – MERGING DATA FILES IN STATA Do.docx
1 ASSIGNMENT 7 C – MERGING DATA FILES IN STATA Do.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Assessment details for ALL students Assessment item.docx
1  Assessment details for ALL students Assessment item.docx1  Assessment details for ALL students Assessment item.docx
1 Assessment details for ALL students Assessment item.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 CDU APA 6th Referencing Style Guide (Febru.docx
1  CDU APA 6th  Referencing Style Guide (Febru.docx1  CDU APA 6th  Referencing Style Guide (Febru.docx
1 CDU APA 6th Referencing Style Guide (Febru.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 BIOL 102 Lab 9 Simulated ABO and Rh Blood Typing.docx
1  BIOL 102 Lab 9 Simulated ABO and Rh Blood Typing.docx1  BIOL 102 Lab 9 Simulated ABO and Rh Blood Typing.docx
1 BIOL 102 Lab 9 Simulated ABO and Rh Blood Typing.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
1 Business Intelligence Case Project Backgro.docx
1  Business Intelligence Case    Project Backgro.docx1  Business Intelligence Case    Project Backgro.docx
1 Business Intelligence Case Project Backgro.docx
oswald1horne84988
 

More from oswald1horne84988 (20)

1 Network Analysis and Design This assignment is.docx
1  Network Analysis and Design  This assignment is.docx1  Network Analysis and Design  This assignment is.docx
1 Network Analysis and Design This assignment is.docx
 
1 Name _____________________________ MTH129 Fall .docx
1  Name  _____________________________ MTH129 Fall .docx1  Name  _____________________________ MTH129 Fall .docx
1 Name _____________________________ MTH129 Fall .docx
 
1 Lab 8 -Ballistic Pendulum Since you will be desig.docx
1  Lab 8 -Ballistic Pendulum Since you will be desig.docx1  Lab 8 -Ballistic Pendulum Since you will be desig.docx
1 Lab 8 -Ballistic Pendulum Since you will be desig.docx
 
1 I Samuel 8-10 Israel Asks for a King 8 When S.docx
1  I Samuel 8-10 Israel Asks for a King 8 When S.docx1  I Samuel 8-10 Israel Asks for a King 8 When S.docx
1 I Samuel 8-10 Israel Asks for a King 8 When S.docx
 
1 Journal Entry #9 What principle did you select .docx
1  Journal Entry #9 What principle did you select .docx1  Journal Entry #9 What principle did you select .docx
1 Journal Entry #9 What principle did you select .docx
 
1 HCA 448 Case 2 for 10042018 Recently, a pat.docx
1  HCA 448 Case 2 for 10042018 Recently, a pat.docx1  HCA 448 Case 2 for 10042018 Recently, a pat.docx
1 HCA 448 Case 2 for 10042018 Recently, a pat.docx
 
1 Chapter 2 Understanding Rhetoric Goal To re.docx
1  Chapter 2 Understanding Rhetoric  Goal To re.docx1  Chapter 2 Understanding Rhetoric  Goal To re.docx
1 Chapter 2 Understanding Rhetoric Goal To re.docx
 
1 HC2091 Finance for Business Trimester 2 2.docx
1  HC2091 Finance for Business      Trimester 2 2.docx1  HC2091 Finance for Business      Trimester 2 2.docx
1 HC2091 Finance for Business Trimester 2 2.docx
 
1 ECE 175 Computer Programming for Engineering Applica.docx
1  ECE 175 Computer Programming for Engineering Applica.docx1  ECE 175 Computer Programming for Engineering Applica.docx
1 ECE 175 Computer Programming for Engineering Applica.docx
 
1 Cinemark Holdings Inc. Simulated ERM Program .docx
1  Cinemark Holdings Inc. Simulated ERM Program  .docx1  Cinemark Holdings Inc. Simulated ERM Program  .docx
1 Cinemark Holdings Inc. Simulated ERM Program .docx
 
1 Figure 1 Picture of Richard Selzer Richard Selz.docx
1  Figure 1 Picture of Richard Selzer Richard Selz.docx1  Figure 1 Picture of Richard Selzer Richard Selz.docx
1 Figure 1 Picture of Richard Selzer Richard Selz.docx
 
1 Films on Africa 1. A star () next to a film i.docx
1  Films on Africa  1. A star () next to a film i.docx1  Films on Africa  1. A star () next to a film i.docx
1 Films on Africa 1. A star () next to a film i.docx
 
1 Contemporary Approaches in Management of Risk in .docx
1  Contemporary Approaches in Management of Risk in .docx1  Contemporary Approaches in Management of Risk in .docx
1 Contemporary Approaches in Management of Risk in .docx
 
1 Assignment front Sheet Qualification Unit n.docx
1  Assignment front Sheet   Qualification Unit n.docx1  Assignment front Sheet   Qualification Unit n.docx
1 Assignment front Sheet Qualification Unit n.docx
 
1 BBS300 Empirical Research Methods for Business .docx
1  BBS300 Empirical  Research  Methods  for  Business .docx1  BBS300 Empirical  Research  Methods  for  Business .docx
1 BBS300 Empirical Research Methods for Business .docx
 
1 ASSIGNMENT 7 C – MERGING DATA FILES IN STATA Do.docx
1  ASSIGNMENT 7 C – MERGING DATA FILES IN STATA Do.docx1  ASSIGNMENT 7 C – MERGING DATA FILES IN STATA Do.docx
1 ASSIGNMENT 7 C – MERGING DATA FILES IN STATA Do.docx
 
1 Assessment details for ALL students Assessment item.docx
1  Assessment details for ALL students Assessment item.docx1  Assessment details for ALL students Assessment item.docx
1 Assessment details for ALL students Assessment item.docx
 
1 CDU APA 6th Referencing Style Guide (Febru.docx
1  CDU APA 6th  Referencing Style Guide (Febru.docx1  CDU APA 6th  Referencing Style Guide (Febru.docx
1 CDU APA 6th Referencing Style Guide (Febru.docx
 
1 BIOL 102 Lab 9 Simulated ABO and Rh Blood Typing.docx
1  BIOL 102 Lab 9 Simulated ABO and Rh Blood Typing.docx1  BIOL 102 Lab 9 Simulated ABO and Rh Blood Typing.docx
1 BIOL 102 Lab 9 Simulated ABO and Rh Blood Typing.docx
 
1 Business Intelligence Case Project Backgro.docx
1  Business Intelligence Case    Project Backgro.docx1  Business Intelligence Case    Project Backgro.docx
1 Business Intelligence Case Project Backgro.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Chris Hunter
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 

©2014 by the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern .docx

  • 1. ©2014 by the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. This case was prepared by Professor Derek D. Rucker and Mauricio O’Connell ’08. All facts and images presented in this case were obtained through communications with a representative from Procter & Gamble on the Old Spice team. Cases are developed solely as the basis for class discussion. Cases are not intended to serve as endorsements, sources of primary data, or illustrations of effective or ineffective management. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, call 800-545-7685(or 617- 783-7600 outside the United States or Canada) or e-mail [email protected] No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Kellogg Case Publishing. DEREK D. RUCKER AND MAURICIO O’CONNELL ’08 KEL786 Old Spice: Repeating Success in the Face of Competitive Threat Planning season for fiscal year 2009–2010 had come for the members of the Old Spice brand
  • 2. team, and they knew another great campaign was needed to drive the growth of their beloved brand. The team had demonstrated the power of advertising after saving the Glacial Falls line in the previous fiscal year by repositioning the scent as Swagger and speaking to the consumers’ desire for confidence. The revitalized campaign was successful not only because it moved the scent from the worst-performing to one of the top three in the portfolio but also because the advertising created a “halo effect”1 for the rest of the portfolio, resulting in growth for the entire Old Spice brand. The Swagger campaign had also been honored with external awards for both its creativity (2009 Silver Cyber Cannes Award) and its effectiveness (2010 Silver Effie Award). The Old Spice brand had always been seen as a bit of a rebellious child within the Procter & Gamble (P&G) portfolio, with less conventional advertising motifs and buying media through agency as opposed to utilizing P&G’s bulk buys. P&G allowed the brand to behave differently because Old Spice constituted only about 1 percent of P&G’s $85 billion portfolio. With its success, however, the rebellious child had begun to catch the attention of other brands within P&G. In just a few years, the Old Spice repositioning of Glacial Falls had become the model within the company for a successful turnaround. Old Spice also served as a strong reminder that a great advertising strategy could have powerful effects on sales without any sensory change in the product experience.
  • 3. Following their recent success, the Old Spice team members had set a high bar for themselves; they wanted to challenge themselves to do something bigger and to prove they had not simply stumbled onto the Swagger success. They wanted to be seen not as one-hit wonders but as members of a group that had a knack for creating sound strategy that one of their key creative partners, the advertising agency Wieden+Kennedy, could then execute. Wieden+Kennedy had built great brands such as Nike and Coca- Cola, and now could count Old Spice as another success story. 1 A halo effect in advertising refers to the growth of a non- advertised product that results from its affiliation with an advertised product. Halo effects occur when a positive reaction to an advertisement increases consumers’ awareness of, or their general attitude toward, other affiliated products, leading them to buy products not advertised. For example, although Swagger was the specific scent advertised in 2008–2009, other Old Spice scents not advertised (e.g., After Hours, Showtime, Aqua Reef) also saw growth attributed to Swagger’s advertising. For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
  • 4. OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786 2 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT The core Old Spice brand team comprised brand manager James Moorhead and his four assistant brand managers: George Felix, Jim Urbaitis, Shanan Sabin, and Mauricio O’Connell. For O’Connell, a recent graduate of the Kellogg School of Management, his first few years as an assistant brand manager had been an unbelievable ride. He had worked on the Swagger launch and was proud to claim part of the responsibility for its success. O’Connell also shared the enthusiasm of his brand team to do something bigger and better. He knew that as a brand manager he could not afford to rest on his laurels; to be successful he would have to best his previous results. Swagger had been so successful, however, that the next campaign would have no easy hurdle to clear. Expectations were high for the Old Spice team, which already had begun to work together to figure out the next “Big Idea.” The following were the options the team was considering. Continue to Promote Swagger Previously the Old Spice team had put the entire force of its advertising budget behind Swagger. At the time, others in P&G thought the strategy risky, as the team had provided no advertising support for the overall Old Spice name in a more than a year. The gamble ended up paying off, as sales numbers had attested to the growth of
  • 5. Swagger: sales were up 175 percent and volume was up 270 percent. And, despite not supporting the broader brand, sales of other Old Spice products had continued to grow steadily. These outcomes suggested that an opportunity existed to continue to grow and secure Swagger’s place in consumers’ hearts and minds. Indeed, the Old Spice team thought it would be a shame if Swagger’s growth stalled because of the potentially unnecessary and premature pulling of advertising to support the broader brand. Thus, one option being considered by the brand team was to continue to fuel the behemoth that the Swagger scent had become. However, Wieden+Kennedy was already ready to move onto a new project and to do something different with the brand. Wieden+Kennedy had already developed three different communication messages for the Swagger scent: Urlacher and LL Cool J, Tony Stewart, and Swaggerize Your Wallet. The issue was whether an extended campaign for Swagger could be launched to keep the new flagship scent ahead of the competition or whether the campaign had reached its zenith and a switch in strategy was required. Rebrand or Promote Another Scent The power of sound advertising and strategy to change brand perception and increase sales led O’Connell, Felix, Urbaitis, Sabin, and Moorhead to consider another advertising effort that would either rebrand or promote another scent in their portfolio. To accomplish such a task, the team could take an approach similar to that of the rebranding of
  • 6. Glacial Falls as Swagger. The team needed first to identify a product that might benefit from rebranding or advertising. Then the team would need to target the consumer and find a consumer insight to feed into the positioning. The Old Spice team was confident that if it could accomplish these objectives, it could deliver a creative brief that would allow Wieden+Kennedy to execute another responsive—or even stunning—advertising campaign. A possible target for rebranding or additional advertising was the scent Showtime, another member of the Red Zone portfolio that Swagger belonged to. Although Swagger had helped fuel growth among other scents, such as Aqua Reef and After Hours, Showtime had become the For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017. KEL786 OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 3 weakest-performing Red Zone scent, accounting for only 8 percent of total sales in the portfolio (see Exhibit 1). For example, the Showtime 3.25-oz deodorant accounted for only about $1 million in sales, compared with more than $6 million for the Swagger deodorant of the same size.
  • 7. Showtime, as with Glacial Falls, had never had its own dedicated advertising campaign. An opportunity therefore existed to build original advertising around a novel consumer insight. The Old Spice team believed Showtime was a good candidate for an advertising campaign. At issue was whether the team should rebrand or promote the existing scent. The brand team also had to consider whom to target and what insight to offer. Most important, the brand team did not want to spend money merely to cannibalize the success it had had with the younger male target for Swagger. The team therefore would likely need to select a new psychographic or demographic target. Once the target was in place, O’Connell and his team would have to discern a consumer insight the brand could target. The team liked the idea of taking more of the young male target, which suggested adopting a different insight. Whereas Swagger had succeeded in using the insight of confidence, Showtime would be most powerful if it had a different insight and could speak to another unmet psychological need of consumers. Although the brand team had not yet chiseled out a specific message, it nonetheless was excited about Showtime. The brand team believed the scent name already carried with it some paths to positioning: The word Showtime could mean the consumer was ready for action. Indeed, O’Connell saw an opportunity to promote Showtime via Old Spice’s NASCAR affiliation (see Exhibit 2 for a mock-up). Back to the Umbrella Brand
  • 8. The brand team also discussed the possibility of advertising the overall brand name, or the “umbrella brand,” rather than focusing on a specific scent. Although advertising Swagger had achieved a halo effect, the Old Spice team was not sure a continued focus on a single scent was the best way to support the entire portfolio. Focusing on the umbrella brand meant the advertising would highlight the Old Spice name and the associations with that name, as opposed to fostering specific associations with a particular scent. The goal would be to keep consumers aware of the overall brand but also to build equity around the portfolio that ideally would be applied to the various scents associated with Old Spice. If the brand team decided to advertise the umbrella brand, it would have to think about a message that would appeal to a larger group of users who represented the brand’s persona. The team had tried such an approach with Wieden+Kennedy before, by associating the brand with sex appeal and a retro look. This effort had not proved anywhere near as successful as the Swagger campaign, which made the team question returning to this position. In addition, the Old Spice brand had a history of being viewed as helping men on their journey through manhood. Indeed, early campaigns for the brand, before the partnership with Wieden+Kennedy, had been all about “manliness.” The team could return to this equity—but if it did so, it would need to figure out a means to represent masculinity in a modern way that did not push the brand too far into the perception of being only for “old guys.” Alternatively, the brand team could come up with
  • 9. another positioning for the umbrella brand. For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017. OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786 4 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT An Emphasis on Body Wash Another option floated by the Old Spice brand team was a focus on body wash. Swagger advertising had focused largely, though not exclusively, on deodorant, but the liquid body wash category had shown significant growth. From 2003 to 2009, that market had grown from $480 million to $756 million nationally, passing bar soap as the preferred means of personal cleansing. During this time, the sales of bar soap fell 40 percent. The insight behind this growth came from usage habits. Men used body wash made for women because it was there in the shower, leading to a decline in soap usage. Perhaps more important, the body wash category also was growing fast because younger generations of men had grown up with liquid soap rather than bar soap. An even bigger catalyst for growth, though, was gender. As brands prompted a difference between men’s and women’s products, households began supplementing their women’s body wash with an
  • 10. additional purchase of men’s body wash, resulting in the expansion of the men’s body wash category. Indeed, with body wash nearly saturated in the women’s market by 2003, most of the growth could be attributed directly to men replacing their bar soap with body wash. Specifically, 58 percent of men between the ages of 18 and 34 reported using body wash; 50 percent of men between the ages of 35 and 54 used body wash; and 42 percent of men ages 55+ used body wash. This growth in the body wash category had not gone unnoticed by P&G or its competitors. Both P&G and Unilever had increased their advertising expenditures in this category at the expense of men’s deodorant advertising, even though the deodorant category attracted three times the dollar volume of body wash. This allocation reflected the belief that deodorants, for the most part, had fully penetrated the market. The importance of body wash and its growth led O’Connell and the Old Spice team to consider the possibility of shifting their own advertising to focus primarily on body wash. The team noted that if this was the objective, it might consider sticking with the Swagger campaign or doing this as part of prompting Showtime. A concern with this advertising shift was that body wash represented only about 20 percent of Old Spice sales. Thus, this strategy carried with it the risk of spending advertising resources on a smaller part of the total business. The Old Spice team was well aware of this tradeoff, which only made the decision harder.
  • 11. Dove for Men’s Bold Announcement: The Super Bowl Buy The Old Spice team’s discussion of its possibilities for the next fiscal year was temporarily disrupted by news of a bold move from competitor Unilever, which announced that its Dove for Men (DFM) line would make its U.S. advertising debut in February 2010 with a focus on body wash. The brand’s entry raised concerns because Dove had a loyal legion of female fans and significant equity in moisturizing. Furthermore, DFM had announced plans to advertise during the Super Bowl, which had a massive reach of more than 100 million consumers. Furthermore, these consumers were not merely passively exposed to Super Bowl advertising; they actively engaged with the advertising, often talking about it the day after the game aired. In addition, recent advancements in technology had only increased the importance of television advertising, especially during the Super Bowl. Technology meant that Super Bowl advertising was no longer something consumers saw once. Consumers now actively searched for Super Bowl advertising online to watch ads again, send links to their friends, or post favorite For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.
  • 12. KEL786 OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 5 spots using social media venues such as YouTube. Consumers actively wanted to know what the best and worst spots of the Super Bowl had been, and the best and worst Super Bowl advertising often received a significant amount of earned media via coverage online, in newspapers, and on news reports. Super Bowl advertising, to put it bluntly, was a massive hammer when it came to reaching consumers. The Old Spice brand team thought it had a strong sense of what was coming from DFM. The campaign would focus on body wash, given its growing importance, and would be aggressive in multiple venues: Super Bowl advertising, in-store advertising, and promotions (see Exhibit 3). In fact, as part of the sixty-second, approximately $7 million Super Bowl buy, DFM would spend more on its one-month launch than Old Spice spent on its category in a year. DFM was also known for testing its advertising globally, perfecting it, and then transplanting it into larger markets such as the United States, Brazil, and China—a strategy referred to by some in the business as “test and learn.” The Old Spice brand team already had seen executions in Italy for DFM that represented the general theme of its upcoming campaign. Although it was tempting to disregard Dove because the brand was too “feminine” to attract male users, the Old Spice team knew that women made more than 60 percent of the purchases
  • 13. of men’s body wash. Indeed, the Old Spice team speculated that DFM’s consumer targeting strategy was actually quite sensible: target the man, but facilitate the purchasers—women—to buy the product. The Old Spice team knew that along with the advertising, DFM would use promotion to acquire trial (e.g., buy one Dove body wash for women and get a free Dove for Men body wash). Dove could capitalize on its equity with and loyalty from women. As a result of this equity, it seemed possible for the Dove brand to convince its core consumers to buy the product for their men. With a big enough media spend, a sound strategy, and good creative, DFM might succeed with men in the United States. And, although some brands naively held the belief that Super Bowl advertising might not be the right venue in which to target women, the Old Spice team knew better. The Super Bowl was a venue for reaching both men and women, with the audience consisting roughly of 56 percent men and 44 percent women. O’Connell and his colleagues needed to consider whether DFM’s launch required them to respond with adjustments to their own advertising strategy. At issue was whether the Old Spice team needed to change its target or positioning in response to the competitive launch in men’s personal care. The Old Spice team needed to further consider whether to pay the heavy entry cost to the Super Bowl, which would be a first for the brand, and a rarity for P&G as a company. O’Connell knew that a response to competition must be taken seriously. At Kellogg he had
  • 14. learned that engaging in a positioning battle one could not win could be a disaster for a brand. And he knew that DFM had the right people and resources to engage in a large media spend, sound positioning, and clever creative. Challenges and Opportunities All of the information on the table led the Old Spice brand team to raise several issues for consideration. First, the team had to decide where to focus its advertising. Second, the team had to decide what position would accompany its strategy. Finally, it had to decide on a media strategy. Linked to each of these decisions was the looming entry of DFM in the Super Bowl. The Old Spice team had to consider how that entry affected its response and decisions to each of these issues. The nature of each of these decisions is outlined below. For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017. OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786 6 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Advertising Strategy: Choice of Product The brand team saw little reason not to advertise, but it had to consider for which of the
  • 15. brand’s products advertising made the most sense. Specifically, the team had to decide whether to: rella brand another scent, or on the umbrella brand Advertising Strategy: Positioning Regardless of what product the Old Spice team chose to advertise, the team needed to make a decision about how to position the brand. In making a positioning choice, the brand team had to consider whether to address DFM’s entry. One thing the Old Spice team did not want to do was position itself for direct product comparisons with DFM. Although DFM had been known in the past to invoke comparison claims with competitors’ brands, P&G did not like the philosophy of singling out a particular brand. Indeed, inviting too much overt comparison had the danger of confusing the consumer and ultimately undermining brand growth. The question was, then, what positioning should the brand use, and should it respond to defend itself against DFM’s entry? The brand team also had to consider the degree of expertise Wieden+Kennedy had with respect to broadening beyond the male target. The agency knew the male consumer mind well,
  • 16. and indeed, all its advertising with Old Spice had been focused on that mindset. The Old Spice team wondered, to a certain degree, whether the agency had the right knack for developing a creative strategy meant to embrace a target beyond its core male consumer. Media Choice Finally, the team mulled over the media choices. The brand had originally launched on television, but it was coming off a very successful social media effort, “Swaggerize Your Wallet,” that had grown sales by an approximate 55 percent above the traditional media efforts. Moreover, the social media effort was extremely affordable compared with using television. At the same time, the brand team was not as confident that it could get both men and women in the same space with social media efforts. Would the two groups be consuming social media together and in the same channels? Also on the table was whether the brand should pay the heavy ante to advertise in the Super Bowl to be present and offer a countervailing force to DFM’s planned appearance. The Super Bowl decision weighed especially heavy on the brand team. A Super Bowl placement would give Old Spice the kind of broad reach to male and female consumers that was impossible to duplicate with a single insertion in other media vehicles. The Super Bowl was also a way to be in the same space as the competition without directly calling out the other brand. The
  • 17. For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017. KEL786 OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 7 team knew it could get approval for the spot, but the thirty- second appearance would cost an estimated $3.4 million. Even for successful veterans, committing that much money to a single advertising buy was daunting. And the entire team felt that a spot could be aired only if it were “Super Bowl–worthy.” Conclusion O’Connell and the Old Spice team pondered the task before them. The success of the Swagger campaign had brought them glory but had also created a high hurdle to clear. Now they had been given the added challenge of having to decide whether to devote further time and effort to respond to a competitive threat. Of course, O’Connell realized the situation he faced revealed an inherent fact of marketing and advertising: Marketing was not just about what your brand did; it was also about properly understanding and responding to the movements of the competition.
  • 18. For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017. OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786 8 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Swagger 39% Aqua Reef 27% After Hours 26% Showtime 8% Exhibit 1: Performance in the Red Zone Line
  • 19. Note: Percentages reflect the approximate dollar share of each scent contributed in 2009. For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017. KEL786 OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 9 Exhibit 2: Mock-Up for Showtime Advertising with NASCAR For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017.
  • 20. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017. OLD SPICE: REPEATING SUCCESS KEL786 10 KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Exhibit 3: Dove for Men Launch Advertising SUPER BOWL Note: The Dove for Men Super Bowl spot can be viewed here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-Lc9Mhi9l0. IN-STORE ADVERTISING PROMOTIONS
  • 21. For the exclusive use of M. Reilly, 2017. This document is authorized for use only by Miranda Reilly in Advertising Strategy-Fall 2017-1 taught by David Basch, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017. Advertising Strategy Case 1 Old Spice: Individual Assignment 2-page summary of the case reading in your own words which includes: Brief summary of the key background information of the case Key problems and opportunities the brand needed to address What is Old Spice’s equity and why was it an important part of the brand’s thinking? Describe the halo effect and its importance. Summary of pros and cons of options What would you recommend of all the options and why? -include your rationale on whether to feature body wash and to do comparative advertising