boing 737max scandal,
starting with the end result and going back to which flaws in the process allowed it to happen.
I presented it internally, emphasis the importance of system tests and E2E tests.
3. Flight 610, flying from from Jakarta’s
International Airport on October 29, 2018
On board are 189 people: 181 passengers, 2
pilots, and 6 flight attendants.
4. 🕥 6:20 16 sec
Flight 610 was given clearance.
Unusual readings were recorded while still on the
ground
- Two displays in the cockpit recorded different
wind speeds
- 2 sensors that measure its orientation in the air,
disagreed by a substantial 21 degrees
7. 🕥 6:21 12 sec
The first officer told the captain that on-board
sensors were giving two different altitude
readings, more than 200ft apart.
The captain spoke with an air traffic controller
in the terminal, who said to climb higher.
8. 🕥 6:21 28 sec
The first officer asked the controller to confirm
the altitude of the plane. The controller said it
was 900ft. On the plane, one display said 790ft,
the other said 1,040ft
9. 🕥 6:21 37 sec
The captain asked the first officer to run
through a memorized checklist for what to do
when the plane is giving unreliable airspeed
readings.
10. 🕥 6:22 24 sec
The captain and controller agreed that the plane
should climb to 5,000 feet.
The plane still showed two different speeds.
11. 🕥 6:22 48 sec
Sensors on the plane radically disagree
about its angle of attack.
One says the plane is flying with its nose
pointing 18 degrees up, the other says it is
flying with the nose 3 degrees down.
12. 🕥 6:23 4 sec
The control column stick shaker again warned of
a possible stall.
The plane warns of both too much speed and not
enough speed.
13. 🕥 6:23 9 sec
The captain asked the first officer for a
memorized checklist of what to do
He gets no reply.
14. 🕥 6:23 15 sec
MCAS -An automatic system on board the
plane begins to force its nose down,
activating for 11 of the next 17 seconds.
15. 🕥 6:23 39 sec
The cockpit voice recorder picks up a sound
of pages turning, suggesting the pilots
looked at a manual.
The captain turned the aircraft nose up.
16. 🕥 6:24 5 sec
The captain again asked for a checklist of
what to do when the plane’s airspeed
recorders can’t be relied on, but the first
officer said he could not find it.
The cockpit voice recorder again picked up
the sound of pages turning.
17. 🕥 6:25 27 sec
MCAS pushes the nose down for two
seconds.
The captain interrupted it, pushing the nose
up for six seconds.
18. 🕥 6:25 40 sec
MCAS activated six times in the next two
minutes, pushing the plane’s nose down
until the captain interrupted it.
19. 🕥 6:27 - 6:30
MCAS activated four more times in the next
minute.
The captain called for an airline engineer
who was on board to come in.
MCAS activated several times more, and the
captain said:
“Look what happened”
20. The captain told the controller that he could
not work out his altitude because the sensors
were giving so many different readings.
Seemingly flustered, he referred to the flight
as number 650 instead of 610.
🕥 6:31 8 sec
21. The captain asked the controller to clear all
planes from 3,000 feet above and below the
plane to avoid any collisions.
🕥 6:31 19 sec
22. The first officer twice told the captain that
the plane was flying downwards. The second
time, the captain said “it’s OK.”
The plane was descending relatively gently,
at around 1,920 feet per minute. MCAS
activated again.
🕥 6:33 19 sec
23. 5 seconds later, the plane warns of its rapid
descent and the approaching sea.
There is almost no time left.
🕥 6:33 51 sec
24. MCAS activated for a final time.
One second later, the flight record and
cockpit voice recorder stop working.
Air traffic control tries six times to contact
the pilots, to no response.
No survivors.
🕥 6:33 51 sec
27. MCAS would trigger in narrow circumstances.
“a nose down command to oppose the pitch up.
Command is limited to 0.6 degrees from trimmed
position.”
Will rely on 2 sensors
Initial design
30. Boeing came up with a probability for MCAS
failure of about once every 223 trillion hours of
flight.
In its first year in service, The MAX fleet logged
118,000 flight hours.
33. The same lack of smooth stick forces was also
occurring in certain low-speed flight
conditions.
Engineers increased the power of the system at
low speed from 0.6 degrees of stabilizer nose-
down deflection to 2.5 degrees each time it was
activated.
2.5 degrees = unlimited authority if pilots
would not intervene.
Problem
34. Boeing never flight-tested a scenario in which a
broken angle-of-attack sensor triggered MCAS
on its own
36. MCAS and its failings are now well-known in
the aviation world.
But many 737 Max pilots say they had no idea
it even existed until after the crashes.
It probably took the two Lion Air pilots totally
by surprise.
37. 1. Why did boeing created a new system ?
2. How come no one knew about it ?
39. Boeing, founded in 1916, dominated the
passenger-jet market with its 737 midsize jet
and the 747 jumbo jet.
For decades, Airbus was barely on Boeing’s
radar.
Airbus is a consortium started in 1970 by
several European countries
40. 2008
Airbus :483 airplanes
Boeing: 375 airplanes
2010
Airbus, updating its A320 model
with a new geared turbo fan
engine. The engine would make
the plane 15% more fuel efficient
1994
John Leahy, an American who
rose through the ranks to
become the chief Airbus
salesman
1999
JetBlue decided to launch with
a fleet composed entirely of
Airbus A320s
2011
American Airlines, an
exclusive Boeing customer for
more than a decade, was ready
to place an order for hundreds
of new, fuel-efficient jets
from the Airbus.
41. At the heart of Boeing’s push was a focus on
creating a plane that was essentially the same as
earlier 737 models
42. 1. Important for getting the jet certified quickly.
2. Help limit the training that pilots would need,
cutting down costs for airlines
47. Oct. 29,
2018
A 737 MAX 8 operated
by Lion Air crashes
after departing
Indonesia, killing all
189 people on board
Nov 6
Boeing issues a
bulletin detailing
what pilot should do
in the event of a
sensor failure that
may cause the plane
to point its node
down.
March 10, 2019
A 737 MAX 8 operated
by Ethiopian Airlines,
killing all 157 people
on board
March 11
Boeing says it will
introduce FAA-
approved changed to
the flight control
system no later than
April
March 12
International agencies
ground the 737 MAX.
March 13
U.S authorities
ground the MAX,
saying “new
evidence” shows
similarities between
2 deadly crashes.
48. Resources
Link Description
crash timeline This timeline shows exactly what
happened on board the Lion Air Boeing
737 Max
casuality Podcast, part of the The Engineered
Network - A network of shows about
all facets of engineering
Risk management FAA Principles of System Safety
Editor's Notes
Indonesian airline Lion Air
From Jakarta (in Indonesia) to Pangkal Pinang (also in Indonesia).
30 seconds before takeoff
alert the pilots of a potential stall.
The altimeter on the captain’s primary flight display indicated 340 feet, while the first officer’s indicated 570 feet
100 feet = 60 meter.
The altimeter on the captain’s primary flight display indicated 340 feet, while the first officer’s indicated 570 feet.
The altimeter on the captain’s primary flight display indicated 340 feet, while the first officer’s indicated 570 feet.
Boeing has been criticised for how the Max design relied on information from only one angle of attack sensor, meaning that a single faulty reading could trigger MCAS.
While the second officer continues to fight the MCAS
585.216 meter
3048 meter
3048 meter
stick-pusher — a device used on some aircraft that without pilot action pushes the control column forward to lower the jet’s nose ( Ray Craig preferred such a physical solution )
“Yeah! This is great,” Craig gushed after seeing how MCAS responded, according to the engineer. (Craig left Boeing before the operation of MCAS was revised.)
Boeing told the FAA in a proprietary System Safety Assessment reviewed
Fault Tree https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A2%D7%A5_%D7%9B%D7%A9%D7%9C
So even though this original version of MCAS required two factors — angle of attack and G-force — to activate, Boeing’s analysis indicated that just one sensor would be acceptable in all circumstances
About a third of the way through flight testing in 2016
Because there are no excessive G-forces at low speed, the engineers removed the G-force factor as a trigger. But that meant MCAS was now activated by a single angle-of-attack sensor.
One of the people familiar with MCAS’s evolution said the system designers didn’t see any need to add an additional sensor or redundancy because the hazard assessment had determined that an MCAS failure in normal flight would only qualify in the “major” category for which the single sensor is the norm.
While the changes were dramatic, Boeing did not submit documentation of the revised system safety assessment to the FAA.
An FAA spokesman said the safety agency did not require a new system safety analysis because it wasn’t deemed to be critical.
“A single point of failure is an absolute no-no,” said one former Boeing engineer who worked on the MAX and is anonymously quoted in The Seattle Times. “That is just a huge system engineering oversight. To just have missed it, I can’t imagine how.”
Why did boeing created a new system?
How come no one knew about it ?
Any idea why ?
Boeing said in a statement that the 2011 decision to build the Max had beaten out other options