Summary of findings for Women in Agile thesis defense presentation. Increasing women's involvement in the Agile community. by Natalie Warnert #WomenInAgile
May 2015
www.nataliewarnert.com
www.womeninagile.com
2. +
Agenda
Introduction and Purpose of Research
Background and Context – What is Agile?
Research Methods
Findings
Recommendations & Strategy
Conclusion
Questions
4. +
Research Question
What are the reasons that prevent female Agile
practitioners from achieving higher levels of
involvement in the Agile community, and what
strategies can overcome them?
6. +
What is Involvement?
External to daily job responsibilities
Blogging
Conference attendance
Submitting to present at conferences
Submitting work for publication
User group attendance, membership, participation
Earning certifications
8. +
Method
Interviews with women in the Agile community (7)
Qualitative data
Survey of the Agile community (103)
Quantitative data
Female
60%
Male
40%
Survey Gender
Distribution
10. +
Reasons that prevent women from
achieving higher levels of involvement
Competing priorities for time
Organizational and career reasons
Lack of confidence, fear of perception from others
Intimidation from lack of diversity
Some event or interaction has deterred my
involvement interest
I am not interested in being more involved
11. +
Survey Questions
What prevents you from being more involved in the
Agile community?
When you think about the Agile community, in your
opinion why are men more involved than women?
12. +
Yes
60%
No
40%
Company Provides Financial
Support for Involvement
Career or Organizational Reasons
Involvement Level and Company
Support (Men and Women) T-Test
Involvement
with
Financial
Support
Involvement
without
Financial
Support
Mean (0-10) 5.31 4.12
Observations 52 33
P(T<=t) one-
tail 0.0378
13. +
Lack of Confidence, Fear of
Perception from Others
“I received comments at multiple conferences I’ve
gone to along the way that, ‘you’re not just a pretty
face ‘and then when I start talking, people think that
‘wow she actually knows what she is talking about’.”
(personal conversation, February 2015)
Men (Individual): 24%
Women (Individual): 19%
Men (Perception of women): 43%
Women (Perception of women): 37%
14. +
Intimidation from Lack of Diversity
“You’d go in and you are the only female, I can see how a lot of
people might drop out and be deterred from that fact. It’s not like
in a college setting, where there’s three women and 28 guys, and
the professor can call on you and boost your self-esteem and say
that you’re just as smart as everyone else in the room, there isn’t
that community across states and in the country. I think it’s a little
more probably intimidating for women to look at all these people
writing these blogs and articles, and they seem super smart and
you compare yourself to them.” (personal conversation, February
2015)
Women (Individual): 9%
Men (Perception of women): 60%
Women (Perception of women): 33%
15. +
Competin
g Priorities
for my
time
Organizati
onal/Care
er
Reasons
Lack of
Confidenc
e, Fear of
perception
from
others
Intimidatio
n from
lack of
diversity
Some
event or
interaction
has
deterred
my
interest
I am not
interested
in being
more
involved
Men and
women
are
involved
equally
Men (Individual) 94% 39% 24% 3% 6% 9%
Women (Individual) 84% 35% 19% 9% 9% 11%
Men (Perception of Women) 60% 30% 43% 60% 47% 3% 10%
Women (Perception of Women) 59% 31% 37% 33% 9% 4% 19%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Men vs. Women – Reasons for lack of
involvement
16. +
Men and Women are Not Equally
Involved
Mean Difference in Men and Women’s
Involvement Levels: T- Test
Women’s
Involvement Level
Men’s
Involvement
Level
Mean (0-10) 4.47 5.67
Observations 57 36
P(T<=t) one-
tail 0.0317
18. +
Strategy Questions
What support or actions have helped you or would
help you to become more involved within the Agile
community?
What support or actions do you think would help
encourage women to become more involved in the
Agile community?
19. +
Research Findings: Strategies to
Support Women’s Involvement
Immediate:
Extend a personal invitation to participate
Mid-Range:
Increase company support to participate
Promote and seek out diversity in Agile community activities
Encourage and facilitate networking among women
Long Term:
Increase early recruitment efforts of girls/women in Science
Technology Engineering & Math (STEM) fields
21. +
Mid-Range: Encourage and
Facilitate Networking Among
Women
“All these men are typically reaching down to pull up
other men like, ‘Hey let’s talk about this project. Do
you want to go get a beer?’ It’s going to be really weird
for me to go get a beer with another married person.
I’m a married person. He’s a man. I’m a woman. That
just doesn’t have good optics and so there are really
no women to reach out and look for sponsors.”
(personal conversation, February 2015)
22. +
Long-Term: Early Recruitment in
STEM fields
“I did a few classes for elementary school kids where
we brought in computers and I tore them apart and I
let them look at them, and then ask me any questions
they had about the computers. At fifth grade level, 24
kids signed up. Not a single girl…I don’t understand
how we’re losing the girls.” (personal conversation,
February, 2015)
24. +
Future Research
How do men perceive themselves?
Will these strategies be successful?
What are the benefits of involvement?
How do perceptions affect involvement and
interaction?
2 min
How I got started in IT and became involved in Agile. Realized there were fewer women present and of those present, fewer involved. Group to address the issue, but it lacked strategy and understanding of the underlying issues that are preventing women from being more involved.
3 min
What are the reasons that prevent female Agile practitioners from achieving higher levels of involvement in the Agile community, and what strategies can overcome them?
4 min
Agile manifesto in 2001
Men are the only signatories
Very structured and led to many misconceptions
And this is what Agile is centered around
5 min
7 min
Individual/Societal – Societal stereotypes affect what women think their priorities must be such as family. Male dominated environments such as Agile and software development can be hostile and widely held perceptions negatively can affect women’s mind-sets about themselves.
Agile/Individual – Women are looking at involvement as competing with their other priorities and are also holding themselves to very high standards for sharing their expertise.
Agile/Societal – Agile culture embraces traits that society views women as more skilled at, e.g. relationship building, collaboration, facilitation
Middle – the purpose of this research is to determine where all these influencing factors converge and how to address them strategically.
8 min
Maybe make less boring – picture?
Interviewed 7 women in the local Agile community from all ranges of involvement, industries, and roles
Survey – women and men in the Agile community – national/global, distributed via social media, open for four days and got over 100 responses.
10 min
Realizations women were coming to when talking to them. Internal struggles with how to answer the questions and why they felt the way they did.
Confidence comes with the title. Interaction with boys and girls.
11 min
Competing priorities for time
Organizational and career reasons
Lack of confidence, fear of perception from others
Intimidation from lack of diversity
Some event or interaction has deterred my involvement interest
I am not interested in being more involved
How the interviews and the survey fed into these
Asked women in the interviews what the biggest reasons were hindering their involvement. Asked both men and women in the survey to understand the popularity of each reason for themselves and how they perceived them influencing women’s involvement specifically.
Competing priorities for time was the most popular, which is not surprising.
The three in orange had the most interesting reasoning behind them and answers were very thought provoking. I will go into more details of the three orange reasons next.
13 min
Explain what organizational and career reasons are: company support, confidentiality, too involved at work already to be externally involved.
Company financial support makes a huge difference in involvement
15 min
Interesting that men cited this more than women as a top two reason.
17 min
Raises a lot of questions (why and how it manifests itself in the behavior and treatment of women, interaction)
18 min
This is a summary of the reasons and questions I have already explained to you.
Points to cover: highest in both is priorities. Discrepancy between women and men, perceptions. Men and women see themselves as less affected than they see others, especially men. Not asked about men’s involvement because of the Men and women are not equally involved.
19 min
20 min
Remind again what involvement is, we just learned the reasons women have for lower involvement levels as stated by themselves and perceived by others, the next portion of the research was to determine how to increase involvement levels.
21 min
22 min
Tie to the research?
research findings:
Strategies to support involvement
Write out STEM (bold) - women
23 minutes – tell story of how I tested this assumption at a user group meeting. This is something that anyone can do immediately.
24 minutes
Mentorship, sponsorship
Networking and events just for women
This is mid range because it will take time to develop relationships between women, build credibility to increase sponsorship.
26 minutes
Is what we’re doing working? Re-evaluate. Need to do it earlier, make things fun, consistency.
Also discuss how recruitment needs to happen later in life by colleges and companies. Educate adults
Experience how women usually do not go into school wanting to be a computer major, but someone suggests it.
28 minutes
Start the Conversation
Extend an invitation
Encourage others