In Benin, chilli pepper is a widely consumed as vegetable whose production requires the use of performant varieties. This work assessed, at Parakou and Malanville, the performance of six F1 hybrids of chilli including five imported (Laali, Laser, Nandi, Kranti, Nandita) and one local (De cayenne), in completely randomized block design at four replications and 15 plants per elementary plot. Agro-morphological data were collected and submitted to analysis of variance and factor analysis of mixed data. The results showed the effects of variety, location and their interactions were highly significant for most of the growth, earliness and yield traits. Imported hybrid varieties showed the best performances compared to the local one. Multivariate analysis revealed that 'De cayenne' was earlier, short in size, thin-stemmed, red fruits and less yielding (â 1 t.ha-1). The imported hybrids LaaliF1 and KrantiF1 were of strong vegetative vigor, more yielding (> 6 t.ha-1) by developing larger, long and hard fruits. Other hybrids showed intermediate performances. This study highlighted the importance of imported hybrids in improving yield and preservation of chili fruits. However, stability and adaptation analyses to local conditions are necessary for their adoption.
3. Evaluation of Agro-morphological Performances of Hybrid Varieties of Chili Pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) in Northern Benin
Int. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 1090
fertilizer with urea (46% N) was applied at the rate of
10g/plant at 35th
and 110th
days after transplanting. To
control weediness, regular weeding and hoeing were
practiced each two weeks.
Data collection
The measured morphological traits were collected on the
five plants of the central line of each elementary plot
(Sekloka et al., 2016). On each of these plants, the fruit
characterization data were taken on three ripe fruits
located respectively in the low, middle and high positions.
The qualitative morphological variables were observed at
plot scale by determining the dominant modality of each
trait. The earliness and fruit yield were evaluated on the
entire central lines of each elementary plot (Table 2).
Table 2: Description of analyzed variables
Centimentre (cm), percentage (%), day after transplanting
(dat), ton per hectare (t/ha)
Data analysis
Data were entered using Excel spreadsheet, and analyzed
thanks to R software 3.6.3 (R Core Team, 2020). For each
quantitative trait, the variability was assessed by
computing descriptive statistics followed by analyzes of
variance to assess the difference between varieties,
locations as well as variety by location interaction. A global
description of the varieties was finally carried out by Factor
Analysis of Mixed Data (FAMD). To this end, the
FactoMineR package developed by Le et al. (2008) was
used.
RESULT
Assessment of visual variability characteristics
between varieties
Like the local variety 'De cayenne', all imported hybrids
showed elongated fruit. Their color at full maturity ranges
from light red to dark red, with predominance of bright red
color, observed on 3 of the 5 imported varieties (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Shape and intensity of red color of fruits of
assessed varieties
When fully ripe, the varieties LaaliF1, LaserF1, NandiF1,
NanditaF1 standing for nearly 67% of the whole, showed
fruits of semi-hard consistency. Only KrantiF1 variety
presented hard fruit and âDe Cayenne' soft fruit.
Analysis of quantitative traits variability
Whether in Parakou or Malanville, high differences and
magnitude between the extreme values, and high
coefficients of variation were observed for several
evaluated traits, especially for the yield parameters (CV>
30%) (Table 3).
From one location to another, most of the agronomic and
morphological variables showed significant differences
between varieties (p<0.05) (Table 3).
Variables (unity) Description
Morphological traits
Stem height (haut-
tige in cm)
Measured from the root collar of
plant to insertion of the youngest
branch
Stem diameter
(Dia-tige in cm)
Ratio of stem circumference to Ï
Etiolation index (IE
in %)
Ratio of diameter to stem height
expressed as percentage
Number of nodes
on the stem (nb-
nĆuds)
Counted on the main stem, from
the collar to insertion of the
youngest leaf
Internode height
on the stem (HEN
in cm)
Ratio of stem height to number of
node of the stem
Fruit Height (haut-
fruit in cm)
Measured using a tape measure
Fruit diameter
(Dia-fruit in cm)
Calculated by the ratio of the fruit
circumference to Ï
Intensity of red
color of fruit
(couleur_fruit)
Visually appreciated through
three modalities: Light red, bright
red and dark red
Fruit consistency
(consistance_fruit)
Appreciated by touch in three
categories: Soft, semi-hard, hard
Agronomic characteristics of varieties
Date of flowering
(Dat.flo in dat)
Date when 50% of the plants
flower on a plot after transplanting
Date of maturity
(Dat.mat in dat)
Date when 50% of the plants
ripen on a plot after transplanting
Average Fruit
Weight (PMF)
Ratio of total fruit weight to
number of fruits
Number of pips per
fruit(nb.pepin)
Counting the number of pips in
each fruit
Fruits yield (Rdt in
t/ha)
Ratio of total weight of fruits to the
plot area
4. Evaluation of Agro-morphological Performances of Hybrid Varieties of Chili Pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) in Northern Benin
Akpo et al. 1091
For stem growth, âDe cayenneâ variety showed overall the
lowest growth performances in height (haut_tige â 25 - 32
cm) and thickness (Dia_tige â 0.6 - 0.9 cm) in both
locations. The varieties LaaliF1 (haut_tige â 50 m; Dia_tige
>1 cm) and NanditaF1 (haut_tige â 62 cm, Dia_tige â 1.6
cm) developed the strongest and slenderest stems
(Dia_tige >1 cm; haut_tige= 0.5 m) in Parakou and
Malanville respectively. Based on stem internode height
(HEN), NandiF1 (0.37) and KrantiF1 (2.46) exhibited the
shortest internodes at Parakou and Malanville
respectively, while Nandita F1 recorded the longest at both
locations (Table 3).
On the other hand, etiolation index (EI) ranged from 2.54
% (NanditaF1) to 3.20 % (LaaliF1, NandiF1) in Parakou
and from 2.00% and 2.71% in Malanville. As for fruit
growth, De cayenne, LaserF1 and NanditaF1 varieties
recorded overall the lowest growth values. In both
locations, the varieties KrantiF1 and LaaliF1 developed the
largest and longest fruits respectively (Table 3).
For earliness, De cayenne and LaaliF1 varieties were
found to be the earliest in Parakou (128.25 dat) and
Malanville (67.25 dat) respectively, while LaserF1 variety
was the latest (Table 3). Assessment of fruit yield showed
average yields of 3.49 t/ha in Parakou and 6.48 t/ha in
Malanville. De cayenne and LaserF1 varieties were the
least yielding (0.4 - 1.59 t/ha) while LaaliF1 and KrantiF1,
the most ones (6.3-10.09 t/ha) (Table 3). In overall, the
different genotypes performed better in terms of average
performances of stem growth and yield traits in Malanville
location versus Parakou (Table 3).
Table 3: Agro-morphological performances of varieties in Parakou and Malanville
Variables Min Variety Max Variety Mean CV (%) Pr(>F)
Parakou
Dia_tige 0.58 De cayenne 1.07 LaaliF1 0.93 28.66 <0.001***
haut_tige 24.81 De cayenne 48.09 LaserF1 40.15 29.02 <0.001***
HEN 0.37 NandiF1 0.64 Nandita F1 0.52 41.14 <0.001***
IE 2.54 NanditaF1 3.20 LaaliF1, NandiF1 2.80 19.22 <0.001***
nb_noeuds 44.44 De cayenne 119.05 LaserF1 90.72 52.88 <0.001***
date_fl 101 De cayenne 115 LaserF1 108.5 4.75 <0.001***
date_mat 128.25 De cayenne 193.5 LaserF1 170.75 13.15 <0.001***
PMF 1.34 LaserF1 7.33 KrantiF1 3.53 66.29 <0.001***
Rdt 0.4 De cayenne 6.3 LaaliF1 3.49 60.32 <0.001***
Dia_fruit 0.89 LaserF1 1.49 KrantiF1 1.17 22.87 <0.001***
haut_fruit 4.52 De cayenne 11.85 LaaliF1 8.15 35.47 <0.001***
nb_pepin 57.39 De cayenne 107.94 KrantiF1 85.25 33.55 <0.001***
Malanville
Dia_tige 0.87 De cayenne 1.57 NanditaF1 1.41 23.68 <0.001***
haut_tige 31.5 De cayenne 61.98 NanditaF1 51.28 22.35 <0.001***
HEN 2.46 KrantiF1 2.93 NanditaF1 2.78 18.05 0.032*
IE 2.00 2.71 2.37 20.74 0.011*
nb_noeuds 12.75 De cayenne 21.18 NanditaF1 18.67 19.6 0.000***
date_fl 39.25 LaaliF1 46 LaserF1 42.92 8.04 0.083ns
date_mat 67.25 LaaliF1 94 LaserF1 79.5 11.99 <0.001***
PMF 1.04 LaserF1 3.7 KrantiF1 2.26 41.69 <0.001***
Rdt 1.59 De cayenne 10.09 LaaliF1 6.48 47.71 <0.001***
Dia_fruit 0.95 NanditaF1 1.52 KrantiF1 1.15 25.38 <0.001***
haut_fruit 7.09 De cayenne 12.14 LaaliF1 9.36 27.61 <0.001***
nb_pepin 58.02 NanditaF1 98.25 KrantiF1 75.98 35.48 <0.001***
Height (haut_tige) and Diameter (Dia_tige) of stem, internode height (HEN) and Number of nodes on the stem
(nb_nodes); Etiolation index (IE); Diameter (Dia_fruit) and height (haut_fruit) of the fruit; date of flowering (Date_fl) and
of maturity (Date_.mat), Average fruit weight (PMF), Number of seeds per fruit (nb_pepin), Fruit yield (Yield)( Rdt ), days
after transplanting (dat), ns not significant (> 0.05); * significant (<0.05), ** highly significant (<0.01); *** very highly
significant (<0.001)
Furthermore, the combined evaluation of average
performances on the two locations showed that apart from
earliness parameters, most of the measured variables
showed very highly significant differences between
varieties (p<0.001). The differences between locations
and interactions variety * location were also highly
significant for most of tested variables (p<0.001) (Table 4).
Joint analysis of qualitative and quantitative
characteristics of hybrids
All the quantitative and qualitative agro-morphological
traits were submitted to Factor Analysis of Mixed Data
(FAMD) for joint assessment of varieties performances.
The analysis revealed that the five main factor axes
explained 100% of the information carried by all of the
starting variables. The first two axes alone have captured
more than 74% of this total variability (Table 5).
5. Evaluation of Agro-morphological Performances of Hybrid Varieties of Chili Pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) in Northern Benin
Int. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 1092
Table 4: Effects of the different factors and their interactions on assessed traits
Variables Mean CV (%) Variety effect Location effect Variety*location
Dia_tige (cm) 1.09 21.9 <0.001***
<0.001***
0.437ns
haut_tige (cm) 43.03 22.7 <0.001***
<0.001***
0.132ns
HEN (cm) 1.51 14.4 0.016*
<0.001***
0.007**
IE (%) 2.57 8.7 <0.001***
<0.001***
0.323ns
nb_noeuds 54.99 27.5 <0.001***
<0.001***
<0.001***
Dia_fruit (cm) 1.16 24.2 <0.001***
0.19ns
<0.001***
Haut_fruit(cm) 8.78 31.9 <0.001***
0.000***
<0.001***
Date_fl (dat) 75.71 4.18 0.997ns
0.000*** 0.01*
Date_mat (dat) 125.13 12.8 0.578ns
0.000*** <0.001***
PMF 2.90 53.12 <0.001***
0.019* 0.002*
Nb_pepin 80.47 0.35 <0.001***
<0.001***
<0.001***
Rdt (t/ha) 4.98 47.65 <0.001***
<0.001***
0.045*
Height (top_stem) and Diameter (Dia_stem) of stem, Height of internode (HEN), Number of nodes on the stem
(nb_nodes); Etiolation index (IE); Diameter (Dia_fruit) and height (haut_fruit) of the fruit; date of flowering (Date_fl) and
of maturity (Date_.mat), Average fruit weight (PMF), Number of seeds per fruit (nb_pepin), Fruit yield (Yield)( Rdt), days
after transplanting (dat), ns not significant (> 0.05); * significant (<0.05), ** highly significant (<0.01); *** very highly
significant (<0.001)
Table 5: Characteristics of the factor axes
Axis 1 Axis 2 Axis 3 Axis 4 Axis 5
Eigen value 6.25 5.63 2.47 1.51 0.15
Explained
Variance (%) 39.05 35.16 15.44 9.43 0.92
Cumulative
variance (%) 39.05 74.21 89.65 99.08 100.00
The correlation circle of variables in the first factor plane
showed strong correlations between traits and factor axes
(Figure 2). The variables of earliness (dates of flowering
and of maturation) and stem growth (height, diameter)
have been positively correlated with each other on the one
hand, and with the first axis on the other. This axis
basically describes the earliness and growth of vegetative
organs of varieties. The diameter and height of fruits, the
number of pips, average fruit weight have been positively
correlated with each other, and also with the second axis.
This axis characterizes the growth and productivity of
fruits. The yield to a certain extent was moderately
described by each of the two axes (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Circle of correlation showing projected variables
in first factor plan
Axis or Dimension 1 (Dim 1) and 2 (Dim 2)
Height (haut_tige) and Diameter (Dia_tige) of stem,
internode height (HEN) and Number of nodes on the stem
(nb_nodes); Etiolation index (IE); Diameter (Dia_fruit) and
height (haut_fruit) of the fruit; date of flowering (Date_fl)
and of maturity (Date_.mat), Average fruit weight (PMF),
Number of seeds per fruit (nb_pepin), Fruit yield (Yield)
(Rdt)
The factor map of all the variables characterizes not only
the strength of quantitative traits relationship with the axes,
but also the association of qualitative parameters with
these axes (Figure 3). Fruit consistency is strongly
associated with the first axis while the intensity of red fruit
color is more described by the second axis.