4. PRESENTATION GOALS
„ Introduce the concept of adaptive governance
„ Explain Ostrom’s Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework
5. PRESENTATION GOALS
„ Introduce the concept of adaptive governance
„ Explain Ostrom’s Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework
„ How to apply SES Framework to archaeological cases
6. PRESENTATION GOALS
„ Introduce the concept of adaptive governance
„ Explain Ostrom’s Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework
„ How to apply SES Framework to archaeological cases
„ Discuss the current state and future directions of this research
7. PRESENTATION GOALS
„ Introduce the concept of adaptive governance
„ Explain Ostrom’s Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework
„ How to apply SES Framework to archaeological cases
„ Discuss the current state and future directions of this research
„ Breakout session to discuss and prepare for AAA presentation
10. ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE
„ Elinor Ostrom – Governing the Commons (1990)
„ Institutional analysis focuses on documenting social-ecological systems
involving the management of common pool resources CPRs
11. ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE
„ Elinor Ostrom – Governing the Commons (1990)
„ Institutional analysis focuses on documenting social-ecological systems
involving the management of common pool resources CPRs
„ Management systems must be localized to SES conditions and have the
ability to adapt to changing conditions and circumstances
12. ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE
„ Elinor Ostrom – Governing the Commons (1990)
„ Institutional analysis focuses on documenting social-ecological systems
involving the management of common pool resources CPRs
„ Management systems must be localized to SES conditions and have the
ability to adapt to changing conditions and circumstances
„ Framework that evolves over time and is used to analyze multi-level
governance strategies
13. ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE
„ Elinor Ostrom – Governing the Commons (1990)
„ Institutional analysis focuses on documenting social-ecological systems
involving the management of common pool resources CPRs
„ Management systems must be localized to SES conditions and have the
ability to adapt to changing conditions and circumstances
„ Framework that evolves over time and is used to analyze multi-level
governance strategies
„ Eight “design principles” have been identified
25. DATA COLLECTION & ORGANIZATION
Resource
Units
(RU)
Variable
descrip-on
Proxy
data
Reference
RU1
Resource
unit
mobility
sta-onary
trees
in
sta-onary
forests
RU2
Growth
or
replacement
rate
years
to
decades
depending
on
size
of
trees
sought
RU3
Interac-on
among
resource
units
cross-‐pollina-on
and
natural
re-‐seeding
if
recovery
-me
is
allowed
RU4
Economic
value
cut
trees
can
be
used
for
charcoal
produc-on,
fuel
and
building
and
boat
construc-on;
woodlands
were
highly
valued
property
archaeobotanical
remains;
geomorphology;
historic
records
Vésteinsson
&
Simpson
2004;
Byock
2001;
Church
et
al.
2007
RU5
Size
individual
trees
to
several
hectares/km
in
area
RU6
Dis-nc-ve
markings
none
known;
ownership
was
documented
by
government
officials
historic
records
Vésteinsson
&
Simpson
2004
RU7
Spa-al
&
temporal
distribu-on
transi-on
from
15-‐40%
of
landscape
covered
by
woodlands
(most
concentrated
in
coastal
lowlands)
to
<
1%
today;
Land
Register
of
17th
c.
shows
that
~50%
of
households
had
access
to
woodlands
archaeobotanical
remains;
pollen
record;
historic
records
Church
et
al.
2007;
Vésteinsson
&
Simpson
2004:184;
Arnalds
1987
26. APPLYING THE SES FRAMEWORK TO
ARCHAEOLOGICAL CASES
„ Methodology involves three stages:
„ Identify the second-tier variables supported by archaeological data
„ Describe each case using Ostrom’s (1990) narrative format
„ Determine which design principles are present in each case
27. APPLYING THE SES FRAMEWORK TO
ARCHAEOLOGICAL CASES
First-Tier SESVariables
Archaeological Data
Historical Data
Environmental Data
Social, Economic and
Political Settings
Settlement patterns,
archaeofauna
Trade documents, political
organization, records of social
hierarchy
Resource distribution on
landscape
Resource System
Archaeofauna, settlement
patterns, archaeobotanical
remains
Descriptions of landscape
Geomorphology, ecology,
pollen record
Resource Units
Archaeofauna, settlement
patterns
Resource documents,
inventories
Geomorphology, ecology
Governance System
Settlement patterns,
archaeobotanical remains
Written laws, treaties, etc
--
Users
Settlement patterns,
archaeobotanical remains,
archaeofauna
--
Pollen record
Interactions
Archaeofauna, settlement
patterns, archaeobotanical
remains
Descriptions of trade and
commerce
--
Outcomes
Archaeobotanical remains
--
Geomorphology, ecology
Related Ecosystems
Settlement patterns
--
Climate proxies
31. EVALUATION OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Grazing System of the
Faroe Islands Adaptive Governance
Design Principle
Woodland Management in
South Iceland
Degree Present? Present? Degree
Low Yes Clearly defined boundaries Yes Low
Moderate Yes Proportional equivalence No --
Low Yes Collective-choice arrangements No Moderate
-- Possible Effective monitoring Possible --
-- Possible Graduated sanctions Possible --
Low Yes Conflict-resolution mechanisms Yes Low
Low Yes Minimal right to organize No Low
Moderate Yes Nested enterprises Yes Moderate
32. EVALUATION OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Grazing System of the
Faroe Islands Adaptive Governance
Design Principle
Woodland Management in
South Iceland
Degree Present? Present? Degree
Low Yes Clearly defined boundaries Yes Low
Moderate Yes Proportional equivalence No --
Low Yes Collective-choice arrangements No Moderate
-- Possible Effective monitoring Possible --
-- Possible Graduated sanctions Possible --
Low Yes Conflict-resolution mechanisms Yes Low
Low Yes Minimal right to organize No Low
Moderate Yes Nested enterprises Yes Moderate
33. EVALUATION OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Grazing System of the
Faroe Islands Adaptive Governance
Design Principle
Woodland Management in
South Iceland
Degree Present? Present? Degree
Low Yes Clearly defined boundaries Yes Low
Moderate Yes Proportional equivalence No --
Low Yes Collective-choice arrangements No Moderate
-- Possible Effective monitoring Possible --
-- Possible Graduated sanctions Possible --
Low Yes Conflict-resolution mechanisms Yes Low
Low Yes Minimal right to organize No Low
Moderate Yes Nested enterprises Yes Moderate
34. EVALUATION OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Grazing System of the
Faroe Islands Adaptive Governance
Design Principle
Woodland Management in
South Iceland
Degree Present? Present? Degree
Low Yes Clearly defined boundaries Yes Low
Moderate Yes Proportional equivalence No --
Low Yes Collective-choice arrangements No Moderate
-- Possible Effective monitoring Possible --
-- Possible Graduated sanctions Possible --
Low Yes Conflict-resolution mechanisms Yes Low
Low Yes Minimal right to organize No Low
Moderate Yes Nested enterprises Yes Moderate
36. CONCLUSIONS
„ SES Framework can be applied to archaeological cases
„ Archaeological cases provide insights into implementation of design
principles and the costs/benefits associated with maintenance over
longue durée
37. CONCLUSIONS
„ SES Framework can be applied to archaeological cases
„ Archaeological cases provide insights into implementation of design
principles and the costs/benefits associated with maintenance over
longue durée
„ Interdisciplinary approach is necessary
38. CONCLUSIONS
„ SES Framework can be applied to archaeological cases
„ Archaeological cases provide insights into implementation of design
principles and the costs/benefits associated with maintenance over
longue durée
„ Interdisciplinary approach is necessary
„ Design principles are essential for successful CPR management in North
Atlantic cases
39. CONCLUSIONS
„ SES Framework can be applied to archaeological cases
„ Archaeological cases provide insights into implementation of design
principles and the costs/benefits associated with maintenance over
longue durée
„ Interdisciplinary approach is necessary
„ Design principles are essential for successful CPR management in North
Atlantic cases
„ Archaeological data and analysis have a demonstrated utility in creating
long-term sustainable CPR systems for the present and future
41. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
„ Improve on data collected and our interpretations
„ What influence do CPRs that are geographically and ecologically related
have on each other?
42. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
„ Improve on data collected and our interpretations
„ What influence do CPRs that are geographically and ecologically related
have on each other?
„ What activities did farmers/communities participate in annually? Do
these activities involve CPRs and are they interrelated?
43. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
„ Improve on data collected and our interpretations
„ What influence do CPRs that are geographically and ecologically related
have on each other?
„ What activities did farmers/communities participate in annually? Do
these activities involve CPRs and are they interrelated?
„ What is the cost of resilience when CPRs are involved?