Writing your Catalogue
What is the Catalogue 
• List of the best research material you have 
found 
• Mix of Primary and Secondary Research 
• Diversity of material 
• Between 10 – 15 items (can be less for a more 
challenging or unusual topic) 
• 2 – 5 rejected sources as the conclusion 
• Total of 20 items 
• Approx. 1000 words 
• Worth 15 marks
How to choose items 
• Have a range to choose from 
• Weigh the value of each item (is it merely just 
listing basic fact eg imdb or does it offer more 
detailed insight) 
• Consider the source of the publication – is it from 
a local newspaper or an well known source like 
Sight and Sound 
• Is the source specific to your topic or is it a more 
general source 
• Keep a balance (even if things contradict your key 
ideas) and variety
What to write 
• In approximately 70 words you need to 
comment on the following 
– How the item relates to the area of investigate (ie 
a key piece of information 
– What value the items has to offer 
– The nature and reliability of its source 
– How is compare to other items 
– The basis for its inclusion (ie why you have 
included it)
Some examples -The Emergence of a 
‘gothic’ genre in American films 
• Item 1: Edward Scissorhands (Fox, US, 1990, Dir. Tim Burton). 
Very useful, as it has all the markers of the new gothic genre 
on display, and also has a clear relationship with Burton's 
early films and his later ones. 
• Item 2: The Crow (Entertainment/Most/Pressman, US, 1994, 
Dir. Alex Proyas). The genre was still in cult territory here, 
and this shows in the comic-book feel. Development of 
genre markers and influence of Burton is clear. Useful, but 
could have easily been one of several other films in this 
place. 
• Item 3: The Craft (Columbia, US, 1996, Dir. Andrew 
Flemming). This is the film that was the turning point for the 
genre, where it suddenly not only got mainstream 
acceptance but also spawned similar films. Very much a teen 
movie, this shows the changing focus towards a new 
audience. Invaluable.
• Item 4: Baiss, B. The Crow: The Story Behind the 
Film (Titan, 2004). This was a very good piece of 
research, as it not only told the story of making 
the film but also gave a broad overview of what 
makes a gothic film. This is possibly the most 
useful piece in the catalogue. 
• Item 5: Smith, J. and Matthews, C. Tim Burton 
(Virgin, 2002). This gives a clear sense of what 
Burton's work is all about, and how he practically 
defined the new American gothic genre. Detailed 
information on all of his films, and on the 
thoughts behind them, this led me to some of the 
other material in the Catalogue and some 
deselected from it.
• Item 6: Tim Burton: Cinema's Prince of 
Darkness, supplement in SFX Magazine, 
March 2005. Details on Burton with a clear 
emphasis on the gothic elements. Could not 
miss being included. 
• Item 7: Travers, P. Auteur in Angora' in Rolling 
Stone Magazine, July 1995. An interesting 
article that looks at Burton as an auteur - 
some good references to his film and some 
discussion of his 'burtonesque' genre
• Item 8: http://www.thetimburtoncollective.com The Tim 
Burton Collective is a fan-based site that offers a 
considerable range of articles, biographical information, 
and links for Tim Burton. This was the best of the Tim 
Burton related sites, as it seemed authoritative and was 
also recommended by many other sources. 
• Item 9: 
http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/04/31/lost in 
translation.html. 'Neon Gothic: Lost in Translation' by 
Wendy Halsem - this is a great article by a university 
lecturer that served to widen my view of the gothic. Full of 
film references, it took my research in several unexpected 
directions (some not so fruitful). 
• Item 10: 
http://minadream.com/timburton/EdwardScissorHands.ht 
m. This is quite a sophisticated site, but I sense it is still a 
fan site. Full of information about Burton and the gothic, 
this was particularly useful for looking at Edward 
Scissorhands.
Having a go 
• Look over the sources you have found so far. Pick five 
that you think should be included in your catalogue. 
• Write up your 70 word description of each source 
• Choose one source that could be a reject source and 
write a short paragraph saying why (look at the 
example in the booklet) 
• Due in 16 Sept
Sentence Starters 
R. This source has taught me that ….. 
• From this source I have learnt that…. 
• A key piece of information from this source was 
• This article/source talks about… 
V. This is a very good source because….. 
• This is a very worthwhile article because …… 
• While this source did have some very good information I have some 
reservations about it because ….. 
N. I feel that this source is reliable because 
• While this is a fan based site I feel it is valuable because…… 
• This source is trustworthy because… 
• This source comes from…… and is reliable because….. 
C/B. When compare to other sources this article offers….. 
• This is possibly the most useful piece in the catalogue because…. 
• While this source was similar to others I have included it because does 
offer… 
• This source must be included because…..

Writing your catalogue

  • 1.
  • 2.
    What is theCatalogue • List of the best research material you have found • Mix of Primary and Secondary Research • Diversity of material • Between 10 – 15 items (can be less for a more challenging or unusual topic) • 2 – 5 rejected sources as the conclusion • Total of 20 items • Approx. 1000 words • Worth 15 marks
  • 3.
    How to chooseitems • Have a range to choose from • Weigh the value of each item (is it merely just listing basic fact eg imdb or does it offer more detailed insight) • Consider the source of the publication – is it from a local newspaper or an well known source like Sight and Sound • Is the source specific to your topic or is it a more general source • Keep a balance (even if things contradict your key ideas) and variety
  • 4.
    What to write • In approximately 70 words you need to comment on the following – How the item relates to the area of investigate (ie a key piece of information – What value the items has to offer – The nature and reliability of its source – How is compare to other items – The basis for its inclusion (ie why you have included it)
  • 5.
    Some examples -TheEmergence of a ‘gothic’ genre in American films • Item 1: Edward Scissorhands (Fox, US, 1990, Dir. Tim Burton). Very useful, as it has all the markers of the new gothic genre on display, and also has a clear relationship with Burton's early films and his later ones. • Item 2: The Crow (Entertainment/Most/Pressman, US, 1994, Dir. Alex Proyas). The genre was still in cult territory here, and this shows in the comic-book feel. Development of genre markers and influence of Burton is clear. Useful, but could have easily been one of several other films in this place. • Item 3: The Craft (Columbia, US, 1996, Dir. Andrew Flemming). This is the film that was the turning point for the genre, where it suddenly not only got mainstream acceptance but also spawned similar films. Very much a teen movie, this shows the changing focus towards a new audience. Invaluable.
  • 6.
    • Item 4:Baiss, B. The Crow: The Story Behind the Film (Titan, 2004). This was a very good piece of research, as it not only told the story of making the film but also gave a broad overview of what makes a gothic film. This is possibly the most useful piece in the catalogue. • Item 5: Smith, J. and Matthews, C. Tim Burton (Virgin, 2002). This gives a clear sense of what Burton's work is all about, and how he practically defined the new American gothic genre. Detailed information on all of his films, and on the thoughts behind them, this led me to some of the other material in the Catalogue and some deselected from it.
  • 7.
    • Item 6:Tim Burton: Cinema's Prince of Darkness, supplement in SFX Magazine, March 2005. Details on Burton with a clear emphasis on the gothic elements. Could not miss being included. • Item 7: Travers, P. Auteur in Angora' in Rolling Stone Magazine, July 1995. An interesting article that looks at Burton as an auteur - some good references to his film and some discussion of his 'burtonesque' genre
  • 8.
    • Item 8:http://www.thetimburtoncollective.com The Tim Burton Collective is a fan-based site that offers a considerable range of articles, biographical information, and links for Tim Burton. This was the best of the Tim Burton related sites, as it seemed authoritative and was also recommended by many other sources. • Item 9: http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/04/31/lost in translation.html. 'Neon Gothic: Lost in Translation' by Wendy Halsem - this is a great article by a university lecturer that served to widen my view of the gothic. Full of film references, it took my research in several unexpected directions (some not so fruitful). • Item 10: http://minadream.com/timburton/EdwardScissorHands.ht m. This is quite a sophisticated site, but I sense it is still a fan site. Full of information about Burton and the gothic, this was particularly useful for looking at Edward Scissorhands.
  • 9.
    Having a go • Look over the sources you have found so far. Pick five that you think should be included in your catalogue. • Write up your 70 word description of each source • Choose one source that could be a reject source and write a short paragraph saying why (look at the example in the booklet) • Due in 16 Sept
  • 10.
    Sentence Starters R.This source has taught me that ….. • From this source I have learnt that…. • A key piece of information from this source was • This article/source talks about… V. This is a very good source because….. • This is a very worthwhile article because …… • While this source did have some very good information I have some reservations about it because ….. N. I feel that this source is reliable because • While this is a fan based site I feel it is valuable because…… • This source is trustworthy because… • This source comes from…… and is reliable because….. C/B. When compare to other sources this article offers….. • This is possibly the most useful piece in the catalogue because…. • While this source was similar to others I have included it because does offer… • This source must be included because…..