Assessment Details and Submission GuidelinesSchoolSchool of
1. Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
School
School of Information Technology & Engineering (SITE)
Course Name
Master of Engineering (Telecommunications)
Unit Code
ME601
Unit Title
Telecommunication Modelling and Simulation
Assessment Author
Dr. Amoakoh Gyasi-Agyei
Assessment Type
Written, Individual Work
Assessment Title
Assignment 1 (Individual Work)
Unit Learning Outcomes covered in this assessment
a. Design, analyse and evaluate wireless mobile communication
systems;
2. b. Research and analyse recent developments, and relate them to
the principles of mobile network design and network
management;
c. Apply engineering techniques, tools and resources to plan and
model cellular networks;
Weight
10%
Total Marks
140
Word/page limit
Maximum 2000 words (8 A4 pages)
Release Date
Week 2, 27th July 2018
Due Date
Week 7 (27th August 2018, 12 midnight on Monday)
Submission Guidelines
with a completed Assignment Cover Page.
-
pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of
your page with appropriate section headings.
4. Moodle, complete it and make it the cover page of your
submission.
Question 1:
(a) Discuss the reasons why multiple antennas are sometimes
mounted at the same height on the same antenna tower.
(b) Assume that an eNodeB uses two sets of antennas which are
mounted one set above the other on the same antenna tower.
Discuss what should be the minimum vertical separation
between the two sets of antennas for proper system functioning.
[10 + 10 = 20 marks]
Question 2
The size of Melbourne city in the Victorian State of Australia is
about 9,990 square kilometers. Assume that a
telecommunications operator called Telstra has 100% mobile
cellular coverage of entire Melbourne. Compute the maximum
number of cell sites that Telstra needs to cover the entire area if
it uses:
(a) micro-cells, each of radius 500 m.
(b) macro-cells, each of radius 20 km.
(c) Use CelPlanner® software to illustrate your design.
Assume that each cell has a hexagonal shape.
[5+5 + 10 = 20 marks]
Question 3 (40 marks)
6. [20 marks]
Question 5
A cell in a mobile cellular network serves a number of users,
each of which on the average generates a single call of duration
3 minutes during the busy hour. Each blocked call is not queued
but cleared. The grade of service of the network is 2%. The
number of duplex traffic channels assigned to the cell is 21.
(a) Compute the maximum number of users that the cell can
serve at the same time if no sectoring is used.
(b) How many users can the cell serve simultaneously if the cell
is divided into:
(i) 3 sectors each covering 120o?
(ii) 6 sectors each covering 60o?
Assume that channels are shared equally among the sectors of a
given cell.
(c) Compare the trunking efficiencies of the three cases studied
above.
[5+10+5 = 20 marks]
Question 6
A mobile system serving a large city has the following
parameters:
8. Academic Discourse Skills (Marks: 10%)
Basic Language Skills (Marks: 10%)
5
Student demonstrates outstanding understanding and content
knowledge beyond the scope required by the assignment task.
The system design methodology is technically sound.
The Lecturer understands the content completely; if there are
any mistakes they do not interfere with the meaning.
Referencing style is 100% in accordance with the IEEE
standards.
There is a clear logical argument, with the points well ordered
and fully supported. It responds appropriately to the question
asked. Enough relevant literature is cited to support work.
Pleasingly broad range of sentence structure and vocabulary is
used. Telecommunication terminology is used correctly.
4
Student demonstrates sound basic knowledge and understanding
of the relevant subject matter. The system design methodology
is technically fairly sound.
Lecturer understands the content, although some sections need
to be read more than once.
The answer responds more or less to the question asked. The use
of supporting evidence, illustration and argument is relevant but
not necessarily sufficient.
10. 1
Student shows little evidence of knowing the relevant content.
The marker can hardly understand the content of the submitted
report.
The ideas or facts presented have little apparent relation to each
other or to the question asked.
Errors in sentence structure, terminology, word choice, word
forms and spelling predominate and prevent communication.
0
1. The answer is copied or substantially copied from materials
or other sources (plagiarism).
2. No relevant attempt has been made by student to solve the
questions.