5. MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION SERIES
Surfaces, Interfaces,Thin Films
SeriesEditors: C. Richard Brundleand CharlesA. Evans,Jr.
SeriesTitles
Encyclopedia of Materiah Characterization, C. Richard Brundle,
CharacterizationofMekth andAlloys,Paul.H. Hollowayand P. N.
Characterizationof Ceramics,Ronald E. Loehman
CharacterimtionofPobmers, Ned J. Chou, Stephen P. Kowalczyk,
Characterizationin SiliconProcessing,Yale Strausser
Characterizationin CompoundSemiconductorProcessing,
Yale Strausser
CharacterizationofIntegraedCircuitPackagingMateriah,
ThomasM. Moore and Robert G. McKenna
CharacterizationofCadyticMateriah,IsraelE. Wachs
Characterizationof CompositeMateriah,Hatsuo Ishida
Characterizationof OpticalMateriah,Gregory J. Exarhos
Characterizationof TribologicalMateriah,William A. Glaeser
Characterizationof Organic ThinFilms,Abraham Ulman
Charlesk Evans,Jr., and ShaunWilson
Vaidyanathan
Ravi Sard, and Ho-Ming Tong
6. ENCYCLOPEDIA
OF MLATERIALS
CHARACTERIZATION
Surfaces, Interfaces, Thin Films
EDITORS
C Ricbard Brundle
CharlesA. Evans,Jr.
SbaunWihon
MANAGINGEDITOR
LeeE. Fitzpatrick
BUTTERWORTH-HEINEMANN
Boston London Oxford Singapore Sydney Toronto Wellington
MANNING
Greenwich
7. Thisbookwas acquired, developed,andproducedbyManningPublicationsCo.
CopyrightQ 1992byButxetworch-Heinemann,adivisionofReedPublishingCUSA) Inc
Au rightsr a d
Noparcofthispublicarionmay be reproduced,scoredinaretriedsystem, ortransmitted,
in anyform orbymeans. electronic, mechanical,photocopying, ororherwise,
without prior writtenpermissionofthe publisher.
Recognizingthe importanceof preservingwhat has beenwritten,it is thepolicyof
Butterworth-Heinemannand ofManningto have the bookstheypublishprintedon
acid-free paper, and weexertour best &m to that end.
LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-Publication Data
Brundle, C. R.
Encyclopediaofmaterialscharacterization:surfaces,interfaces,thin films/C. Richard Brundle, CharlesA. Evans,
Jr., ShamWilson.
p. un.--(Materials characterizationseries)
Indudesbibliographicalrefrrenoaand index.
ISBN CL7506-9168-9
1.Surfaces(Tedmoology)-Tes~ I. Evans,Charlak 11.Wilson,Shaun. 111.Title. IV.Series.
TA418.7.B73 I992 92-14999
620’.4Pdc20 CIP
Butterworth-Heinemann
80MontvaleAvenue
Stoneham,MA02180
ManningPublications Co.
3h i s Street
Greenwich,CT 06830
1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
Printedin the Unired StatesofAmerica
8. Contents
Prefaceto Series ix
Preface x
Acronyms Glossary xi
Contributors xvi
INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES
1.0 Introduction I
Technique Summaries 7-56
IMAGING TECHNIQUES(MICROSCOPY)
2.0 Introduction 57
2.1 Light Microscopy 60
2.2 ScanningElectron Microscopy, SEM 70
2.3 ScanningTunneling Microscopyand
2.4 TransmissionElectron Microscopy,TEM 99
ScanningForce Microscopy, STM and SFM 85
ELECTRONBEAM INSTRUMENTS
3.0 Introduction 117
3.1 Energy-DispersiveX-Ray Spectroscopy,EDS 120
3.2 Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopyin the
Transmission Electron Microscope,EELS 135
3.3 Cathodoluminescence, CL 149
3.4 ScanningTransmission Electron Microscopy, STEM 161
3.5 Electron Probe X-Ray Microanalysis,EPMA 175
V
9. STRUCTUREDETERMINATIONBY DIFFRACTIONAND SCATTERING
4.0 Introduction 193
4.1 X-Ray Diffraction, XRD 198
4.2 ExtendedX-Ray Absorption Fine Structure,EXAFS 214
4.3 Su&ce ExtendedX-Ray Absorption Fine Structureand
Near EdgeX-Ray Absorption Fine Structure,SEXAFS/NEXAFS
Auger Electron Difiction, XPD and AED
227
4.4 X-Ray Photoelectron and
4.5 Low-Energy Electron Diffraction, LEED 252
4.6 Reflection High-EnergyElectron Diffraction,WEED 264
240
ELECTRONEMISSIONSPECTROSCOPIES
5.0 Introduction 279
5.1 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy,XPS 282
5.2 Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy,UPS 300
5.3 Auger Electron Spectroscopy,AES 310
5.4 ReflectedElectron Energy-loss Spectroscopy,
REELS 324
X-RAYEMISION TECHNIQUES
6.0 Introduction 335
6.1 X-Ray Fluorescence,XRF 338
6.2 Total Reflection X-Ray FluorescenceAnalysis, TXRF 349
6.3 Particle-InducedX-Ray Emission, PIXE 357
VISIBLE/W EMISSION, REFLECTION,AND ABSORPTION
7.0 Introduction 371
7.1 Photoluminescence,PL 373
7.2 Modulation Spectroscopy385
7.3 VariableAngle SpectroscopicEllipsometry, VASE 401
VIBRATIONALSPECTROSCOPIESAND NMR
8.0 Introduction 413
8.1 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy,FTIR 416
8.2 RamanSpectroscopy 428
8.3 High-Resolution Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy,HREELS 4-42
8.4 Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, NMR 460
vi Contents
10. ION SCATTERINGTECHNIQUFS
9.0 Introduction 473
9.1 Rutherford BackscatteringSpectrometry,RBS 476
9.2 Elastic Recoil Spectrometry,ERS 488
9.3 Medium-EnergyIon Scatteringwith
Channelingand Blocking,MEIS 502
9.4 Ion scattering Spectroscopy,Iss 514
MASSAND OPTICALSPECTROSCOPIES
10.0
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
Introduction 527
Dynamic SecondaryIon MassSpectrometry,Dynamic SIMS
StaticSecondaryIon Mass Spectrometry,StaticSIMS 549
SurficeAnalysis by h e r Ionization, SAL1
SputteredNeutral Mass Spectrometry,SNMS
Laser Ionization Mass Spectrometry,LIMS
SparkSourceMass Spectrometry,SSMS 598
Glow-DischargeMass Spectrometry,GDMS 609
InductivelyCoupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry,ICPMS
InductivelyCoupled Plasma-Optical
Emission Spectroscopy,ICP-OES 633
532
559
586
571
624
NEUTRONANDNUCLEARTECHNIQUES
1'1.0 Introduction 645
11.I Neutron Diffraction 648
11.2 Neutron Reflectivity 660
11.3 Neutron ActivationAnalysis, NAA 671
11.4 Nuclear ReactionAnalysis, NRA 680
PHYSICALAND MAGNETICPROPERTIES
12.0 Introduction 695
12.1 SurfaceRoughness:Measurement, Formation by
Sputtering,Impact on Depth Profiling 698
12.2 Optical Scatterometry 711
12.3 Magneto-optic Kerr Rotation, MOJSE 723
12.4 Physical and ChemicalAdsorption Measurement of
Solid SurfaceAreas 736
Contents vii
11.
12. Prefaceto Series
This Materialj CharacterizationSeries attempts to address the needs of the practi-
cal materials user, with an emphasis on the newer areas of surfice, interface, and
thin film microcharacterization. The Series is composed of the leading volume,
Enychpedia of Materialj Characterization,and a set of about 10 subsequent vol-
umes concentratingon characterizationof individualmaterials classes.
In the Encyclopedia, 50 brief articles (each 10-18 pages in length) are presented
in a standard format designed for ease of reader access, with straightforward
technique descriptionsand examples of their practical use. In addition to the arti-
cles, there are one-page summaries for every technique, introductory summaries
to groupings of related techniques, a complete glossary of acronyms, and a tabu-
lar comparisonof the major features of all 50techniques.
The 10volumes in the Series on characterizationof particular materials classes
include volumes on silicon processing, metals and alloys, catalytic materials,
integrated circuit packaging, etc. Characterization is approached from the mate-
rials user’s point of view. Thus, in general, the format is based on properties, pro-
cessing steps, materials classification, etc., rather than on a technique. The
emphasis of all volumes is on surfaces, interfaces, and thin films, but the emphasis
varies depending on the relative importance of these areas for the materials class
concerned. Appendixes in each volume reproduce the relevant one-page summa-
ries from the Encyclopedia and provide longer summaries for any techniques
referred to that are not coveredin the Envcbpedia
The concept for the Seriescame firom discussionwith Marjan Bace of Manning
Publications Comparly. A gap exists between the way materials characterization
is often presented and the needs of a large segment of the audience-the materials
user, process engineer, manager, or student. In our experience,when, at the end of
talks or courses on analytical techniques, a question is asked on how a particular
material (or processing) characterization problem can be addressed the answer
often is that the speaker is “an expert on the technique, not the materials aspects,
and does not have experience with that particular situation.” This Series is an
attempt to bridge this gap by approaching characterization problems from the
sideof the materials user rather than from that of the analyticaltechniquesexpert.
We would like to thank Marjan Bace for putting forward the original concept,
Shaun Wilson of Charles Evans and Associates and Yale Strausser of Surface Sci-
ence Laboratories fbr help in hrther defining the Series, and the Editors of all the
individual volumes for their efforts to produce practical, materials user based
volumes.
C R Brundle C.A.Evans,Jr.
ix
13. This volume contains 50 articles describing analytical techniques for the charac-
terization of solid materials, with emphasis on surfaces, intedices, thin films,
and microanalyticalapproaches. It is part of the Materzah CharacterizationSeries,
copublishedby Buttenvorth-Heinemann and Manning. Thisvolumecan serveasa
stand-alone reference as well as a companion to the other volumes in the Series
which deal with individual materials classes. Though authored by professional
characterization experts the articles are written to be easily accessible to the
materialsuser, the processengineer,the manager, the student-in shortto all those
who arenot (andprobablydon’t intend to be) expertsbut who need to understand
the potential applications of the techniques to materials problems. Too often,
techniquedescriptions arewritten for the techniquespecialist.
With 50 articles, organization of the book was difficult; certain techniques
could equally well have appeared in more than one place. The organizational
intent of the Editors was to group techniques that have a similarphysical basis, or
that provide similar types of information. This is not the traditional organiza-
tion of an encyclopedia,where articles are ordered alphabetically.Such ordering
seemedless useful here, in part because many of the techniqueshave multiple pos-
sible acronyms(anAcronym Glossavyis provided to help the reader).
The articles follow a standard format for each technique: A clear description
of the technique, the range of information it provides, the range of materials to
which it is applicable, a few typical examples, and some comparison to other
related techniques. Each technique has a “quickreference,” one-page summary in
Chapter 1,consistingof a descriptiveparagraph and a tabular summary.
Some of the techniques included apply more broadly than just to surhces,
interhces, or thin films; for example X-Ray Diffraction and Infrared Spectros-
copy, which have been used for half a century in bulk solid and liquid analysis,
respectively.They are included here because they have by now been developed to
also apply to surfaces. A fay techniques that are applied almost entirely to bulk
materials (e.g., Neutron Diffraction) are included because they give complemen-
tary information to other methods or because they are referred to significantlyin
the 10 materials volumes in the Series. Some techniques were left out because
they were consideredto be too restricted to specificapplicationsor materials.
We wish to thank all the many contributorsfor their efforts, and their patience
and restraint in dealing with the Editors who took a hirly demanding approach
to establishingthe format, length, style, and content of the articles. We hope the
readers will consider our efforts worthwhile. Finally, we would like to thank Lee
Fitzpatrick of Manning Publications Co. for her professional help as Managing
Editor.
C.R.Brund. CA.Evans,/r. S.Mhon
14. Acronyms Glossary
This glossary lists all the acronyms referred to in the encyclopedia together with
their meanings. The major technique acronyms are listed alphabetically. Alter-
natives to these acronyms are listed immediately below each of these entries, if
they exist. Related acronyms (variations or subsets of techniques; terminology
used within the technique area) are grouped together below the major acronym
and indented to the right. Most, but not all, of the techniques listed here are the
subject of individual articlesin this volume.
AAS
AA
VPD-AAS
GFAA
FAA
AES
Auger
S A M
SAM
AED
ADAM
K.E
CMA
AIS
BET
BSDF
BRDF
BTDF
CL
CLSM
EDS
EDX
EDAX
EELS
HEELS
REELS
REELM
EELS
AtomicAbsorption Spectroscopy
AtomicAbsorption
Vapor Phase Decomposition-AtomicAbsorption Spectroscopy
GraphiteFurnaceAtomicAbsorption
Flame AtomicAbsorption
Auger ElectronSpectroscopy
Auger Electron Spectroscopy
ScanningAuger Microscopy
ScanningAuger Microprobe
Auger Electron Diffraction
Angular DistributionAuger Microscopy
KineticEnergy
CylindricalMirror Analyzer
Atom InelasticScattering
Brunauer, Emmett, andTeller equation
BidirectionalScatteringDistribution Function
BidirectionalReflective Distribution Function
BidirectionalTransmissionDistribution Function
Cathodluminescence
ConfocalScanningLaser Microscope
Energy Dispersive(X-Ray) Spectroscopy
Energy DispersiveX-Ray Spectroscopy
CompanysellingEDX equipment
Electron EnergyLossSpectroscopy
High-ResolutionElectronEnergy-Loss Spectroscopy
ReflectedElectronEnergy-Loss Spectroscopy
ReflectionElectronEnergy-Loss Microscopy
Low-Energy Electron-LossSpectroscopy
xi
15. PEELS
EXELFS
EELFS
CEELS
VEELS
EPMA
ElectronProbe
ERS
HFS
HRS
FRS
ERDA
ERD
PRD
EXAFS
SEXAFS
NEXAFS
XANES
XAFS
FMR
FTIR
FT Raman
HREELS
HRTEM
GDMS
GDQMS
Gloquad
ICP-MS
ICP
LA-ICP-MS
ICP-Optical
ICP
IETS
IR
FTIR
GC-FTIR
TGA-FTIR
ATR
Parallel (Detection)ElectronEnergy-LossSpectrscopy
ExtendedEnergy-Loss Fine Structure
ElectronEnergy-Loss FineStructure
CoreElectronEnergy-Loss Spectroscopy
ValenceElectronEnergy-Loss Spectroscopy
Electron ProbeMicroanalysis
ElectronProbeMicroanalysis
ElasticRecoil Spectrometry
HydrogenForwardScattering
Hydrogen Recoil Spectrometry
ForwardRecoil Spectrometry
ElasticRecoil DetectionAnalysis
ElasticRecoilDetection
ParticleRecoilDetection
ExtendedX-RayAbsorptionFine Structure
SurfaceExtendedX-RayAbsorptionFine Structure
Near-EdgeX-RayAbsorptionFine Structure
X-Ray AbsorptionNear-Edge Structure
X-RayAbsorptionFine Structure
FerromagneticResonance
See IR
SeeRaman
See EELS
SeeTEM
Glow DischargeMass Spectrometry
Glow DischargeMassSpectrometryusing a
QuadrupleMassAnalyser
Manufacturername
InductivelyCoupledPlasma Mass Spectrometry
InductivelyCoupled Plasma
Laser Ablation ICP-MS
InductivelyCoupledPlasma OpticalEmission
InductivelyCoupledPlasma
InelasticElectronTunnelingSpectroscopy
Infrared(Spectroscopy)
FourierTransformInfra-Red (Spectroscopy)
Gas ChromatographyFTIR
Thermo GravimetricAnalysisFTIR
ArtenuatedTotalReflection
xii Acronyms Glossary
16. RA
IRAS
ISS
LEIS
RCE
LEED
LIMS
LAMMA
LAMMS
LIMA
NRMPI
MEISS
MEIS
MOKE
SMOKE
NAA
INAA
NEXAFS
XANES
NIS
NMR
MAS
NRA
OES
PAS
PIXE
HIXE
PL
PLE
PR
EBER
RDS
Raman
FT Raman
RS
RRS
CARS
ReflectionAbsorption (Spectroscopy)
Infrared ReflectionAbsorption Spectroscopy
Ion ScatteringSpectrometry
Low-Energy Ion Scattering
ResonanceChargeExchange
Low-Energy Electron Diffraction
Laser Ionization Mass Spectrometry
Laser MicroprobeMass Analysis
Laser MicroprobeMass Spectrometry
Laser Ionization MassAnalysis
Nonresonant Multi-Photon Ionization
Medium-EnergyIon ScatteringSpectrometry
Medium-EnergyIon Scattering
Magneto-optic Kerr Rotation
SurfaceMagneto-optic Kerr Rotation
Neutron ActivationAnalysis
InstrumentalNeutron ActivationAnalysis
Near EdgeX-RayAbsorption Fine Structure
X-Ray Absorption Near EdgeStructure
Neutron InelasticScattering
Nuclear MagneticResonance
Magic-Angle Spinning
Nuclear ReactionAnalysis
Optical Emission Spectroscopy
PhotoacousticSpectroscopy
Particle InducedX-Ray Emission
Hydrogen/HeliumInducedX-ray Emission
Photoluminescence
PhotoluminescenceExcitation
Photoreflectance
ElectronBeam Electroreflectance
ReflectionDifferenceSpectroscopy
Raman Spectroscopy
FourierTransform Raman Spectroscopy
Raman Scattering
ResonantRaman Scattering
CoherentAnti-Stokes Raman Scattering
Acronyms Glossary xiii
17. SERS SurfaceEnhancedRaman Spectroscopy
RutherfordBackscatteringSpectrometry
High-EnergyIon Scattering
Reflected High Energy Electron Diffraction
ScanningReflectionElectronMicroscopy
SurficeAnalysisby h e r Ionization
Post-IonizationSecondaryIon Mass Spectrometry
Multi-Photon Nonresonant Post Ionization
MultiphotonResonant Post Ionization
ResonantPost Ionization
Multi-PhotonIonization
Single-PhotonIonization
Sputter-InitiatedResonance IonizationSpectroscopy
SurfaceAnalysii by ResonantIonizationSpectroscopy
Time-of-FlightMass Spectrometer
SeeAES
ScanningElectronMicroscopy
ScanningElectronMicroprobe
SecondaryElectron Miscroscopy
SecondaryElectron
Backscattered Electron
SecondaryElectronMicroscopywith PolarizationAnalysis
ScanningForce Microscopy
ScanningForceMicroscope
AtomicForceMicroscopy
ScanningProbeMicroscopy
SecondaryIon MassSpectrometry
DynamicSecondaryIon Mass Spectrometry
StaticSecondaryIon Mass Spectrometry
SIMSusing a QuadrupleMassSpectrometer
SIMSusing a MagneticSectorMassSpectrometer
SeeMagneticSIMS
SIMSusingTune-of-FlightMass Spectrometer
Post IonizationSIMS
SputteredNeutralsMass Spectrometry
SecondaryNeutralsMass Spectrometry
Direct BombardmentElectronGasSNMS
SparkSourceMass Spectrometry
SparkSourceMass Spectrometry
SeeTEM
ScanningTunnelingMicroscopy
RBS
HEIS
WEED
SREM
SAL1
PISIMS
MPNRPI
MRRPI
RPI
MPI
SPI
SINS
SARIS
TOFMS
SAM
SEM
SE
BSE
SEMPA
SFM
AFM
SPM
SIMS
DynamicSIMS
StaticSIMS
MagneticSIMS
SectorSIMS
TOF-SIMS
PISIMS
Q-SIMS
SNMS
SNMSd
SSMS
SparkSource
STEM
STM
xiv Acronyms Glossary
18. SPM
ScanningTunnelingMicroscope
ScanningProbeMicroscopy
Thermal EnergyAtom Scattering
TransmissionElectron Microscopy
TransmissionElectron Microscope
ConventionalTransmission Electron Microscopy
ScanningTransmission Electron Microscopy
High ResolutionTransmission Electron Microscopy
SelectedArea Diffraction
AnalyticalElectron Microscopy
ConvergentBeam Electron Diffraction
LorentzTransmissionElectron Microscopy
Thin Layer Chromatography
Tandem ScanningReflected-LightMicroscope
Tandem ScanningReflected-LightMicroscope
SeeXRF
TEAS
TEM
CTEM
STEM
HRTEM
SAD
AEM
CBED
LTEM
TLC
TSRLM
TSM
TXRF
UPS
MPS
VASE
WDS
WDX
XAS
X P S
ESCA
XPD
PHD
KE
XRD
GIXD
GIXRD
DCD
XRF
XFS
TXRF
TRXFR
VPD-TXRF
Ultraviolet PhotoelectronSpectroscopy
Ultraviolet PhotoemissionSpectroscopy
MolecularPhotoelectronSpectroscopy
VariableAngle SpectroscopicEllipsometry
WavelengthDispersive &-Ray) Spectroscopy
Wavelength DispersiveX-Ray Spectroscopy
X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy
X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
X-Ray PhotoemissionSpectroscopy
Electron Spectroscopyfor ChemicalAnalysis
X-Ray PhotoelectronDiffraction
PhotoelectronDiffraction
KineticEnergy
X-RayDiffraction
GrazingIncidenceX-Ray Diffraction
GrazingIncidenceX-Ray Diffraction
Double CrystalDiffractometer
X-Ray Fluorescence
X-Ray FluorescenceSpectroscopy
Total ReflectionX-Ray Fluorescence
Total ReflectionX-Ray Fluorescence
Vapor Phase DecompositionTotalX-Ray Fluorescence
Acronyms Glossan/ xv
19. MarkR Antonio
BP Research International
Cleveland, OH
J. E. E. Bagh
IBMAlrnaden ResearchCenter
SanJose, CA
ScottBaumann
CharlesEvans &Associates
Redwood City, CA
ChristopherH. Becker
SRIInternational
MenloPark, CA
AlbertJ. Bevolo
Ames Laboratory,
Iowa StateUniversity
Ames, IA
J. B. Bindell
AT&T BellLaboratories
Allentown, PA
FilippoRadicati diBrozolo
CharlesEvans&Associates
Redwood City, CA
C. R Brundle
IBMAlmaden ResearchCenter
SanJose, CA
DanieleCherniak
Rennsselaer PolytechnicInstitute
Troy,NY
Paul Chu
CharlesEvans &Associates
RedwoodCity,CA
Carl Colvard
CharlesEvans&Assoociates
RedwoodCity, CA
J. Neal Cox
INTEL,ComponentsResearch
SantaClara, CA
John Gustav Delly
McCroneResearch Institute
Chicago, IL
ExtendedX-RayAbsorptionFine Structure
ElasticRecoil Spectrometry
RutherfordBackscatteringSpectrometry
SurfaceAnalysisby Laser Ionization
ReflectedElectron Energy-LossSpectro~copy
ScanningElectron Microscopy
Laser Ionizarion Mass Spectrometry
X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy;
Ultraviolet PhotoelectronSpectroscopy
Nuclear ReactionAnalysis
DynamicSecondaryIon MassSpectrometry
Photoluminescence
FourierTransformInfraredSpectroscopy
Light Microscopy
xvi
20. Hellmut F.ckert
UniversityofCalifornia, SantaBarbara
SantaBarbara, CA
Peter Eichinger
GeMeTecAnalysis
Munich
P. Fenter
RutgersUniversity
Piscataway,NJ
David E. Fowler
IBM Almaden Research Center
SanJose, CA
S. M. Gaspar
University ofNew Mexico
Albuquerque,NM
ROYH. Geiss
IBMAlmaden Research Center
SanJose, CA
TorgnyGustafsson
RutgersUniversity
Piscataway,NJ
William L. Harrington
EvansFast
Plainsboro, NJ
BrentD. Hermsmeier
IBMAlmaden ResearchCenter
SanJose,CA
K.C. Hidunan
University ofNewMexico
Albuquerque,NM
Tim Z. Hossain
CornellUniversity
Ithica,NY
Rebecca S. Howland
ParkScientificInstruments
Sunnyvale,CA
JohnC.Huneke
CharlesEvans&Assodates
RedwoodCity, CA
TingC. Huang
IBMAlmadenResearch Center
SanJose, CA
William Katz
EvansCentral
Minnetonka,MN
MichaelD. Kirk
Park ScientificInstruments
Sunnyvale,CA
SolidStateNuclearMagneticResonance
TotalReflectionX-Ray Fluorescence
Medium-Energy Ion Scatteringwith
ChannelingandBlocking
Magneto-optic Kerr Rotation
OpticalScatterometry
Energy-DispersiveX-Ray Spectroscopy
Medium-EnergyIon ScattefmgWith
Channelingand Blocking
SparkSourceMassSpectromeuy
X-Ray PhotoelectronandAuger
Electron Diffraction
OpticalScatterometry
NeutronActivationAnalysis
ScanningTunnelingMicroscopy
and ScanningForce Microscorn
SputteredNeutralMassSpectrometry,
Glow-DischargeMass Spectrometry
X-Ray Fluorescence
StaticSecondaryIonMassSpectrometry
ScanningTunnelingMicroscopy
and ScanningForce Microscopy
Contributors xvii
21. BruceE. Koel
UniversityofSouthernCalifornia
LosAngles, CA
Max G. Lagally
UniversityofWmnsin,
Madison, WI
W. A. Lanford
StateUniversityofNewYork,
Albany, NY
CharlesE. Lyman
Lehigh University
Bethlehem, PA
SusanMacKay
Perkin Elmer
Eden Prairie, MN
John R McNeil
Universityof New Mexico
Albuquerque,NM
Ronald G. Musket
LawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratory
Livermore,(=A
S. S.H. Naqvi
Universiy of New Mexico
Albuquerque,NM
DaleE. Newbury
NationalInstitutesof Scienceand Technology
Gairhersburg, MD
David Norman
SERCDaresbury Laboratory
Daresbury, Cheshire
John W. Olesik
Ohio StateUniversity
Columbus,OH
Fred H. Pollak
BrooklynCollege,CUNY
NewYork, NY
ThomasP. Russell
IBMA l d e n ResearchCenter
SanJose, CA
Donald E. Savage
UniversityofWisconsin
Madison, WI
Kurt E. Si&
LosAlamosNationalLaboratory
LosAlamos,NM
Paul G. Snyder
Universityof Nebraska
Lincoln, NE
High-ResolutionElectron Energy
Loss Spectrometry
Low-EnergyElectron Diffraction
Nudear ReactionAnalysis
ScanningTransmission Electron Microscopy
Surface Analysisby LaserIonization
OpticalScatterometry
Partide-InducedX-Ray Emission
OpticalScatterometry
Electron ProbeX-RayMicroanalysis
SurfaceExtended X-Ray Absorption
FineStructure,Near EdgeX-Ray
AbsorptionFine Structure
InductivelyCoupledPlasma-Optical
Emission Spectroscopy
Modulation spectroscopy
Neutron Reflectivity
ReflectionHigh-EnergyElectron Diffraction
Transmission E l m n Microscopy
VariableAngle SpectroscopicEllipsometry
xviii Contributors
22. Gene Sparrow
AdvancedR&D
St. Paul, MN
Fred A. Stevie
AT&T Bell Laboratories
Allentown,PA
Yale E. Strausser
SurfaceScienceLaboratories
Mountainview,CA
BarryJ. Streusand
AppliedAnalytical
Austin,TX
Raymond G. Teller
BP Research International
Cleveland,OH
Michael F. Toney
IBM AlmadenResearch Center
SanJose, CA
WojciechViech
CharlesEvans &Assoociates
RedwoodCity, CA
William B. White
PennsylvaniaSkateUniVeI'Siq'
UniversityPark, PA
S.R Wilson
Universityof New Mexico
Albuquerque,NM
JohnA. Woollam
Universityof Nebraska
Lincoln,NE
Ben G. Yacobi
Universityof Californiaat LosAngeles
LosAngeles, CA
DavidJ. C. Yates
Consultant
Poway, CA
Nestor J. Zaluzec
ArgonneNational Laboratory
Argonne, IL
Ion ScatteringSpectroscopy
SurfaceRoughness:Measurement,
Formation by Sputtering, Impact on
Depth Profiling
AugerElectron Spectroscopy
InductivelyCoupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
Neutron Diffraction
X-Ray Diffraction
Glow-DischargeMassSpectrometry
Raman Spectroscopy
Optical Scatterometry
VariableAngleSpectroscopicEllipsometry
Cathodoluminescence
Physical and ChemicalAdsorption for the
Measurementof SolidSurfaceAreas
ElectronEnergy-Loss Spectroscopyin the
TransmissionElectronMicroscope
Contributors xix
23.
24. I
INTRODUCTION AND
SUMMARIES
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Though a wide range of analytical techniques is covered in this volume there are
certain traits common to many of them. Most involve eitherelectrons,photons, or
ions as a probe beam strikingthe materialto be analyzed.The beaminteractswith
the materialin someway, and in someof the techniquesthe changesinducedin the
beam (energy, intensity, and angular distribution) are monitored after the inter-
action, and analytical information is derived from the observation of these
changes. In other techniques the information used for analysis comes from elec-
trons, photons, or ions that are ejected from the sample under the stimulation of
the probe beam. In many situationsseveral connectedprocesses may be going on
more or less simultaneously, with a particular analytical technique picking out
only one aspect, e.g., the extent of absorption of incident light, or the kinetic
energydistributionof ejectedelectrons.
The rangeof informationprovidedby the techniquesdiscussed hereisas0wide,
but again there are common themes. What types of information are provided by
these techniques?Elemental composition is perhaps the most basic information,
followed by chemical state information, phase identification, and the determina-
tion ofstructure(atomicsites, bond lengths,and angles). One might need to know
howthesevaryas a functionof depth into the material,or spatiallyacrossthe mate-
rial, and many techniquesspecializein addressingthesequestionsdown to very fine
dimensions.For su&s, interfaces,and thin filmsthere is ofienverylittlematerial
at all to analyze, hence the presence of many microanalyticalmethods in this vol-
ume. Within thisfield (microanalysis)it iso b necessaryto identifytracecompo-
nents down to extremelylow concentration (partsper trillion in some cases) and a
number of techniquesspecializein this aspect. In other cases a high degreeof accu-
racy in measuringthe presence of major components might be the issue. Usually
the techniques that are good fbr trace identificationare not the sameones used to
accurately quantifymajor components. Most complete analyses require the use of
1
25. multiple techniques, the selection of which depends on the nature of the sample
and the desiredinformation.
Thisfirst chaptercontainsonepage summariesofeachof the 50techniquescov-
ered in the followingchapters.All summarieshave the same format to alloweasy
comparisonand quick accessto the information.Further comparativeinformation
is provided in the introductions to the chapters. Finally, a table is provided at the
endofthis introduction,inwhichmanyoftheimportantparametersdescribingthe
capabilitiesforall 50techniquesarelisted.
The subtitleof this Series is “Su&m, Interfices, and Thin Films.” The defi-
nition of a “surface”or of a “thinfilm”varies considerablyh m person to person
and with application area. The academic discipline of ‘‘Surfice Science” is
largely concerned with chemistry and physics at the atomic monolayer level,
whereas the “surfaceregion” in an engineeringor applicationssense can be much
more extensive. The same is true for interfaces between materials. The practical
consideration in distinguishing“sudace” from “bulk” or “thin” from “thick” is
usually connected to the property of interest in the application. Thus, fbr a cata-
lytic reaction the presence of haf a monolayer of extraneoussulfur atoms in the
top atomic layer of the catalyst material might be critical, whereas for a corro-
sion protection layer (for example, Cr segregation to the surface region in steels)
the important region ofdepth may be several hundred 8,. For interfaces the epi-
taxial relationship between he last atomic layer of a single crystal material and
the first layer of the adjoining material may be critical for the electrical proper-
ties of a device, whereas diffusion barrier interfaces elsewhere in the same device
may be 1000A thick. In thin-film technologyrequirements can range from layers
pm thick, which for the majority ofanalytical techniquesdiscussed in this volume
constitute bulk material, to layers as thin as 50 8, or so in thin-film magnetic
recording technology. Because of these different perceptions of “thick” and
“thin,”actual numbers are used whenever discussingthe depth an analytical tech-
nique examines.Thus in Ion ScatteringSpectroscopythe signalsused in the anal-
ysis are generated fiom only the top atomic monolayer of material exposed to a
vacuum, whereas in X-ray photoemission up to 1008,is probed, and in X-ray flu-
orescencethe signal can come from integrateddepths ranging up to 10 pm. Note
that in these three examples, two are quoted as having rangesofdepths.For many
ofthe techniques it is impossible to assign unique values because the depth from
which a signal originates may depend both on the particular manner in which the
technique is used, and on the nature ofthe material being examined.Perfbrming
measurements at grazing angles ofincidence of the probe beain, or grazing exit
angles fbr the detected signal, will usually make the technique more surfacesensi-
tive. For techniques where X-ray, electron, or high-energy ion scattering is the
critical Factor in determining the depth analyzed, materials consisting of light
elements are always probed more deeply than materials consisting of heavy ele-
ments.
2 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
26. Another confusingissue is that of “depth resolution.” It is a measurementof the
technique’s ability to clearly distinguish a property as a function of depth. For
example a depth resolution of 20 A, quoted in an elemental composition analysis,
means that the compositionat one depth can be distinguishedfrom that at another
depth if there is at least 20
A depth profile is a record of the variationof a property (suchascomposition)as
a function of depth. Some of the techniques in this volume have essentially no
intrinsicdepth profiling capabilities;the signalis representativeof the materialinte-
grated over a fived probing depth. Most, however, can vary the depth probed by
varying the condition of analysis,or by removing the surface, layer by layer, while
collectingdata.
By varying the angle of incidence, the X-ray, electron, or ion beam energy, etc.
many techniques are capable of acquiringdepth profiles. Those profiles are gener-
ated by combining several measurements, each representative of a different inte-
grated depth. The higher energy ion scattering techniques (Medium Energy Ion
Scattering, MEIS,and Rutherford Backscattering, RBS), however, are unique in
that the natural output of the methods is compositionasa function of depth. By far
the most common way of depth profilingis the destructivemethod of removingthe
surface, layer by layer, while also taking data. For the mass spectrometry-based
techniques of Chapter 10, removal of surface material is intrinsic to the sputtering
and ionizationprocess. Other methods, suchasAuger Electron Spectroscopy,AES,
or X-Ray Photoemission,XPS, use an ancillaryion beam to remove material while
constantly ionizing the newly exposed surface. Under the most favorable condi-
tions depth resolutionsof around 20Acan be achievedthisway, but there are many
artifacts to be aware of and the depth resolution usually degrades rapidly with
depth. Someaspectsof sputterdepth profilingaretouched upon in the article“Sur-
face Roughness”in Chapter 12, but for a more completediscussionof the capabil-
ities and limitations of sputter depth profiling the reader is referred to a paper by
D. Marton and J. Fine in Thin Solid Films, 185, 79, 1990 and to other articles
cited there.
between them.
3
27. Compilationof Comparative Informationonthe AnalyticalTechniques DiscussedinThisVolume
Maininformation
Article Technique
No.
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
XI
0 3.3
0
3.4
C
0
4.1zrn
P 4.2
0 4.3
C 4.3
4.4
5E
!E
Firn 4.6
3
2 3.5
v)
% 4.5
5.1
5.2
5.3
8PI
R
4d
Light
Microscopy
SEM
STM
SFM
TEM
EDS
EELS
Gthodo-
1umin&cence
STEM
EPMA
XRD
EXAFS
SEXAFS
NEXAFS
XPD
LEED
WEED
XPS
U P S
AES
Depth
probed
( w i d )
Variable
m e subpm
m m m subA
m e m subA
200 nm*
1pm
m e e 20 nm*
e e m e
e
. e 10nm-pm
100nm*
e lpm
10Cun
e e Bulk*
e e lnm
e . . .
e . .
e . 1nm
m . 3nm
1 nm
m m l n m
m e 3nm
m e
e 1nm
e . 2 nm
T p ofsolidsample
(typical)
0.2 pn
10 nm
i A
1Ml
5 nm
0.5 pn
1 nm
1Cun
lnm
0.5 pm
mm
mm
mm
mm
150prn
0.1 mrn
0.02 mm
150pm
mm
100nrn
500 ppm
Few%
PPm
-
100ppm
3%
Few%
Few %
Few%
1%
-
-
1%
0.1%
-
All
Cond,coatedins.
Conductors
All
All;e200 nm thick
AU;Z>5
All;e30 nm thick
All; sunicond. usually
All; e200 nm thick
All; flat best
Crystalline
All
Surfaceand adsorbate
Surfaceandadsorbate
Singlecrystal
Singlecrystal
Singlecrysml
All
All
All, inorganic usually
N 1
Y 2
N 2
N 2
Y 3
Y 2
Y 2
Y 1
Y 3
Y 3
N 2
YIN -
Y -
Y -
Y 3
Y -
Y -
Y 3
Y -
Y 3
1 Y
1 Y
3 Y
2 Y
2 Y
2 Y
3 N
3 N
3 N
2 Y
1 Y
3 N
3 N
3 N
3 N
2 N
2 N
1 Y
3 N
1 Y
28. Compilationof ComparativeInformationonthe AnalyticalTechniquesDiscussedinThisVolume
Maininformation
Article Technique
No.
5.4
6.1
6.2
6.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
10.1
10.2
10.3
VI
REELS
XRF
TXRF
PKE
Photo-
luminescence
Modulation
VASE
FTIR
Raman
Scattering
HREELS
NMR
RBS
ERS
MEIS
ISS
Dynamic
SIMS
static
SIMS
SALI
spectrosmpy 1Pm
lw
a a a m
a a Fewpm
a a F e w p
a a 2 nm
a m Bulk
a a m To 2 pn
1 P n
0
3A
0 0 . 1nm
0 2 nm
o m a 3 A
a m 3 A
100nm
rnm
un
100pn
FewPn
100pm
20 pm
llrm
un
mm
1oow
100 nrn
PPrn
-
Variable
Variable
1%
0.01-10%
0.01%
0.1%-10%
50 ppm-1%
PPb-PPm
Few %
PPb-PPrn
All
All
Trace heavy metals
All
All, semicond. usually
All, semicond. usually
Flat thin h
All
All
AU;flatcond. best
All; not all elements
All
H containing
All; usuallysinglecrystal
All
All, mostly sernicond.
All, mostly polymer
AU,mostlyinorg.
Y - 3 N
N 2 1 Y
Y 3 3 Y
Y 3 3 Y
N 1 2 N
N 2 3 N
N 2 3 Y
N 2 1 Y
N 2 2 Y
Y 3 3 N
N 3 3 N
Y l N 3 2 Y
Y - 3 N
Y 3 3 N
Y - 3 Y
Y 3 1 Y
Y 3 2 Y
Y 3 3 N
29. Compilationof ComparativeInformationon the AnalyticalTechniques DiscussedinThis Volume
Depth Width
(typical) (typical) (typical)
0, 6.
Maill ~ n l l a t i ~
TkCe Types ofsolid sample
(typical)
ArrideTechnique probed probed capability
No.
10.4 SNMS . 1.5 nm un 50 PPm Flat conductors Y 2 2 Y
10.5 LIMS * .
10.6 SSMS 0
10.7 GDMS 0
10.8 ICPMS .10.9 ICPOES 0
ll.' ; E 2 0 l l
5 11.2 ;l;g;v
11.3 NAA
11.4 NRA
20
0
C
Optical
0
: 12.2 scatternmetryz
v) 12.3 MOU
P 12.4 Adsorption
U
..
* .
100nm 2pm 1-100ppm All Y 3 2 Y
3 P cm 0.05 ppm Samplef o r m s e l d e Y - 2 Y
5w mm PPt All Y 2 1 Y
5 P mm PPb All Y 1 1 Y
100nm cm ppt-ppb Sampleformselecd y 3 2 Y
Bulk I
Crystalline N - 3 N
uptomm - - Flatpolymerfilms N - 3 N
Bulk - PPt-PPm Trace metals N 2 3 Y
10-1OOnm l o p 10-lOOppm All:z<21 Y - 3 Y
0 - mm - Flatsmoothfilms N 1 3 Y
30nm 0 . 5 ~ - Magnetic films N 1 2 N
Outeratoms - - LargesurFacearea Y - 2 N
v)
Notes Tbitable shouldbeuscdasa"quickreference" guideody.
CommnrialZnmMuntcThesemtypical costs;large ranges dependingon sophistication andaccessories:
1 means < $50k2 means $50-300k; 3 means >$300k."-" meansno mmplcrecommerciainstrument.
Usup:Numbersreferto usage for anaylsisofsolidmaterials. 1 means Extensive;2 means medium;3 means not common.
Timcapz6iliy:Guideonly. Oftenvery material/wnditions dependent. "-" meansnot used for trace components.
!ix
% *Measuredin transmission.
iii
v)
0
5
'E!
m,-I
30. Light Microscopy 1.2.1
The light microscope uses the visible or near visible portion of the electromagnetic
spectrum; light microscopy is the interpretive use of the light microscope. This
technique, which is much older than other characterization instruments, can trace
its origin to the 17th century. Modern analytical and characterization methods
began about 150years ago when thin sections of rocks and minerals, and the first
polished metal and metal-alloy specimens were prepared and viewed with the
intention of correlating their structures with their properties. The technique
involves,at itsvery basiclevel,the simple, directvisual observationof a samplewith
white-light resolution to 0.2 pm. The morphology, color, opacity, and optical
propertiesare often sufficient to characterizeand identifl a material.
Range of samples
characterized
Destructive
Quantification
Detection limits
Resolvingpower
Imagingcapabilities
Main use
Instrument cost
Size
Almost unlimited for solidsand liquid crystals
Usually nondestructive; sample preparation may
involve material removal
Via calibrated eyepiece micrometers and image
analysis
To sub-ng
0.2 pm with white light
YeS
Direct visual observation; preliminary observation
for final characterization, or preparative for other
instrumentation
$2,500-$50,000 or more
Pocket to large table
7
31. ScanningElectronMicroscopy(SEM) 1.2.2
The Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) is often the first analytical instrument
used when a "quick look" at a material is required and the light microscope no
longerprovides adequateresolution. In the SEMan electron beam is focusedinto a
fine probe and subsequently raster scanned over a small rectangular area. As the
beam interactswith the sampleit createsvarioussignals(secondaryelectrons,inter-
nal currents, photon emission, etc.), all of which can be appropriately detected.
These signals are highly localized to the area directly under the beam. By using
these signals to modulate the brightness of a cathode ray tube, which is raster
scanned in synchronismwith the electronbeam, an image is formed on the screen.
This image is highly magnified and usually has the U 1 ~ ~ k "of a traditional micro-
scopic image but with a much greater depth of field. With ancillary detectors, the
instrument is capableof elementalanalysis.
Main use High magnification imaging and composition
(elemental) mapping
No, some electron beam damage
10~-300,000~;5000~-100,000~is the typical
operating range
500eV-50 keV; typically,20-30 keV
conducting film; must be vacuum compatible
Less thanO.lmm, up to 10cm or more
1-50 nm in secondaryelectron mode
Varies from a few nm to a few pm, depending upon
the acceleratingvoltageand the mode of analysis
Destructive
Magnification range
Beam energy range
Samplerequirements Minimal, occasionally must be coated with a
Samplesize
Lateralresolution
Depth sampled
Bonding information No
Depth profiling Only indirect
capabilities
Instrument cost $100,000-$300,000is typical
Size Electronicsconsole3ft. x 5 fi.;electron beam column
3 ft. x 3 ft.
8 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
32. Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and
Scanning Force Microscopy (STMand SFM) 1.2.3
In ScanningTunneling Microscopy(STM) or Scanning Force Microscopy(SFM),
a solid specimenin air, liquid or vacuum is scanned by a sharp tip locatedwithin a
few A of the surface. In STM, a quantum-mechanical tunneling current flows
between atoms on the surface and those on the tip. In SFM, also known as Atomic
Force Microscopy(AFM), interatomic forcesbetween the atoms on the surfaceand
those on the tip cause the deflection of a microfabricated cantilever. Because the
magnitude of the tunneling current or cantileverdeflectiondepends stronglyupon
the separation between the surfaceand tip atoms, they can be used to map out sur-
facetopography with atomic resolution in all three dimensions.The tunneling cur-
rent in STM is also a function of local electronic structure so that atomic-scale
spectroscopyis possible. Both STM and SFM are unsurpassed as high-resolution,
three-dimensional profilometers.
Parametersmeasured Surface topography (SFM and STM); local electronic
Destructive No
Vertical resolution
Lateral resolution
Quantification Yes; three-dimensional
Accuracy
Imaging/mapping Yes
Field of view From atoms to > 250 pm
Samplerequirements STM-solid conductorsand semiconductors,conductive
coating required for insulators; SFM-solid conductors,
semiconductorsand insulators
structure (STM)
STM, 0.01 8;SFM, 0.1 A
STM, atomic; SFM, atomic to 1nm
Better than 10%in distance
Main uses Real-space three-dimensional imaging in air,
vacuum, or solution with unsurpassed resolu-
tion; high-resolution profilometry; imaging of
nonconductors (SFM).
Instrument cost
Size
$65,000 (ambient) to $200,000 (ultrahigh vacuum)
Table-top (ambient), 2.27-12 inch bolt-on flange
(ultrahighvacuum)
9
33. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) 1.2.4
In Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) a thin solid specimen (5 200 nm
thick) is bombarded in vacuumwith a highly-focused,monoenergeticbeam of elec-
trons. The beam is of sufficient energyto propagate through the specimen.A series
of electromagneticlensesthen magnifies this transmitted electron signal. Diffracted
electrons are observed in the form of a diffraction pattern beneath the specimen.
This information is used to determine the atomic structure of the material in the
sample. Transmitted electrons form images from small regions of samplethat con-
tain contrast, due to several scattering mechanisms associated with interactions
between electronsand the atomic constituents of the sample.Analysis of transmit-
ted electron images yields information both about atomic structure and about
defects present in the material.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Quantification
Accuracy
Detection limits
Depth resolution
Lateral resolution
Imaging/mapping
TEM does not specificallyidentifyelements
measured
Yes, during specimen preparation
Sometimes, indirectlyfrom diffractionand image
simulation
Yes, atomic structures by diffraction;defect character-
ization by systematicimage analysis
Lattice parameters to four significant figures using
convergentbeam diffraction
One monolayer for relativelyhigh-Zmaterials
None, except there are techniques that measure
sample thickness
Better than 0.2 nm on some instruments
Yes
Samplerequirements Solid conductors and coated insulators. Typically
3-mm diameter, c 200-nm thick in the center
Main uses Atomic structure and Microstructural analysisof solid
materials, providinghigh lateral resolution
Instrument cost $300,000-$1,500,000
Size 100 fL2to a major lab
10 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
34. Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS) 1.3.1
When the atomsin a materialareionizedbya high-energyradiation they emit char-
acteristicX rays. EDS is an acronym describinga technique of X-ray spectroscopy
that is based on the collection and energy dispersion of characteristic X rays. An
EDS system consistsofa sourceofhigh-energy radiation, usually electrons; a sam-
ple; a solid state detector, usually made from lithium-drifted silicon, Si (Li); and
signal processing electronics. EDS spectrometersare most frequently attached to
electron column instruments. X rays that enter the Si (Li) detector are converted
into signalswhich can be processed by the electronics into an X-ray energy histo-
gram. This X-ray spectrum consists of a series of peaks representative of the type
and relative amount ofeach element in the sample. The number of counts in each
peak may be furtherconvertedinto elementalweight concentration either by com-
parison with standardsor by standardlesscalculations.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Quantification
Detection limits
Lateralresolution
Depth sampled
Imaging/mapping
Boron to uranium
No
Not readilyavailable
Best with standards, although standardless methods
arewidelyused
Nominally P5%, relative, for concentrations
> 5yo wt.
100-200 ppm for isolated peaks in elements with
Z>11,1-2% wt. for low-Zand overlappedpeaks
-5-1 pm for bulk samples; as small as 1 nm for thin
samplesin STEM
0.02 to pm, depending on Z and keV
In SEM, EPMA, and STEM
Samplerequirements Solids, powders, and composites; size limited only by
the stage in SEM, EPMA and XRF; liquids in XRF;
3 mm diameter thin foils in TEM
To add analytical capability to SEM, EPMA and
TEM
$25,000-$100,000, depending on accessories (not
including the electron microscope)
Main use
cost
11
35. ElectronEnergy-LossSpectroscopyinthe
TransmissionElectron Microscope(EELS) 1.3.2
In Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) a nearly monochromatic beam of
electrons is directed through an ultrathin specimen, usually in a Transmission
(TEM) or ScanningTransmission (STEM) Electron Microscope. As the electron
beam propagates through the specimen, it experiences both elastic and inelastic
scatteringwith the constituent atoms,which modifies its energydistribution. Each
atomic speciesin the analyzed volume causes a characteristicchange in the energy
of the incident beam; the changesareanalyzedby meansofa electronspectrometer
and counted by a suitabledetectorsystem.The intensityofthe measured signalcan
be used to determine quantitatively the local specimen concentration, the elec-
tronic and chemical structure,and the nearest neighbor atomic spacings.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Depth profiling
Quantification
Detection limits
Depth probed
Lateral resolution
ImagingCapabilities
Lithium to uranium; hydrogen and helium are some-
times possible
No
Yes, in the near-edgestructure of edge profiles
information
None, the specimenis alreadythin
capabilities
Without standards+fl0-20% at.; with standards
-1-2% at.
-lo-21 g
Thickness of specimen (I2000A)
1 nm-10 pm, depending on the diameter of the inci-
dent electronprobe and the thicknessof the specimen
Yes
Samplerequirements Solids;specimensmust be transparentto electronsand
-100-2000 athick
Main use Light element spectroscopy for concentration,
electronic, and chemical structure andysis at ultra-
high lateral resolution in a TEM or STEM
As an accessory to a TEM or STEM: $50,000-
$150,000 (doesnot include electron microscope cost)
cost
12 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
36. Cathodoluminescence(CL) 1.3.3
In Cathodoluminescence (CL) analysis, electron-beam bombardment of a solid
placed in vacuum causes emission of photons (in the ultraviolet, visible, and near-
infrared ranges) due to the recombination of electron-hole pairs generated by the
incident energetic electrons. The signal provides a means for CL microscopy (i.e.,
CL images are displayed on a CRT) and spectroscopy (i.e., luminescence spectra
from selected areas of the sample are obtained) analysis of luminescent materials
using electron probe instruments. CL microscopycan be used for uniformity char-
acterization (e.g., mapping of defects and impurity segregation studies), whereas
CLspectroscopyprovidesinformation on variouselectronicpropertiesof materials.
Range of elements
Chemical bonding
information
Nondestructive
Detection limits
Depth profding
Lateralresolution
Imaging/mapping
Not element specific
Sometimes
Yes; caution-in certain cases electron bombardment
may ionizeor create defects
In favorable cases, dopant concentrations down to
1014atoms/cm3
Yes, by varying the range of electron penetration
(between about 10 nm and several pm), which
depends on the electron-beam energy ( I 4 0kev).
On the order of 1 pm; down to about 0.1 pm in
special cases
Yes
Samplerequirements Solid, vacuum compatible
Quantification Difficult, standardsneeded
Main use Nondestructivequalitativeand quantitativeanalysisof
impuritiesand defects, and their distributions in lumi-
nescent materials
Instrument cost $25,000-$250,000
Size Smalladd-on item to SEM,TEM
13
37. ScanningTransmission
Electron Microscopy (STEM) 1.3.4
In Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) a solid specimen, 5-
500 nm thick, is bombarded in vacuum by a beam (0.3-50 nm in diameter) of
monoenergeticelectrons. STEM imagesare formedby scanningthis beam in a ras-
ter acrossthe specimenand collectingthe transmitted or scattered electrons.Com-
pared to the TEM an advantageof the STEM is that manysignalsmay be collected
simultaneously:bright- and dark-field images;Convergent Beam Electron Diffrac-
tion (CBED) patterns fbr structure analysis; and energy-dispersive X-Ray Spec-
trometry (EDS) and Electron Energy-Loss Spectrometry (EELS) signals for
compositional analysis. Taken together, these analysis techniques are termed Ana-
lyticalElectron Microscopy (AEM).STEM provides about 100times better spatial
resolution of analysis than conventionalTEM. When electronsscattered into high
angles are collected, extremely high-resolution images of atomic planes and even
individual heavy atomsmay be obtained.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Quantification
Accuracy
Detection limits
Lateral resolution
Imaging/mapping
capabilities
Lithium to uranium
Yes, during specimenpreparation
Sometimes,from EELS
Quantitative cornpositional analysis from EDS or
EELS, and crystal structure analysis from CBED
5-10% relativefor EDS and EELS
0.1-3.0% wt. for EDS and EELS
Imaging,0.2-10 nm; EELS, 0.5-10 nm; EDS, 3-30 nm
Yes, lateralresolution down to < 5 nm
Samplerequirements Solidconductorsand coated insulatorstypically 3 mm
in diameter and c 200 nm thick at the analysis point
b r imaging and EDS, but < 50 nm thick for EELS
Microstructural,crystallographic,and compositionalanal-
ysis; highspatial resolution with @elemental detection
and accuracyjuniquestructural analysiswithCBED
Main uses
Instrument cost $500,000-$2,000,000
Size 3 m x 4 m x 3 m
14 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
38. Electron ProbeX-Ray Microanalysis(EPMA) 1.3.5
Electron Probe X-Ray Microanalysis (EPMA) is an elemental analysis technique
based upon bombarding a specimen with a focused beam of energetic electrons
(beam energy 5-30 kev) to induce emission of characteristicX rays (energy range
0.1-15 kev). The X rays are measured by Energy-Dispersive (EDS) or Wave-
length-Dispersive(WDS) X-ray spectrometers.Quantitativematrix (interelement)
correction procedures based upon first principles physical models provide great
flexibility in attacking unknown samples of arbitrary composition; the standards
suite can be as simple as pure elementsor binary compounds. Typical error distri-
butions are such that relative concentration errorslie within &4% for 95% of cases
when the analysis is performed with pure element standards. Spatial distributions
of elemental constituents can be visualized qualitativelyby X-ray area scans (dot
maps) and quantitativelyby digital compositionalmaps.
Range of elements Beryllium to the actinides
Destructive No, except for electronbeam damage
Chemical bonding In rare cases: from light-elementX-ray peak shifts
Depth profiling Rarely, by changingincident beam energy
Quantification Standardlessor;pure element standards
Accuracy &4% relative in 95% of cases;flat, polished samples
Detection limits WDS, 100ppm; EDS, 1000ppm
Samplingdepth Energy and matrix dependent, 100nm-5 pm
Lateral resolution Energy and matrix dependent, 100 nm-5 pm
Imaging/mapping Yes, compositionalmapping and SEM imaging
Samplerequirements Solid conductors and insulators;typically,e 2.5 cm in
diameter, and e 1 cm thick, polished flat; particles,
rough surfldces,and thin films
Major uses Accurate, nondestructive quantitative analysis of
major, minor, and trace constituents of materials
Instrument cost $300,000-$800,000
Size 3 m x 1.5 m x 2 m high
15
39. X-Ray Diffraction(XRD) 1.4.1
In X-Ray Diffraction(XRD)a collimatedbeam ofX rays,withwavelengthh- 0.5-
2 8,is incidenton a specimenand isdiffractedby the crystallinephasesin thespec-
imen accordingto Bragg's law (h = 2dsin0, where dis the spacingbetween atomic
planes in the crystallinephase).The intensityof the diffractedX rays is measuredas
a hnction of the diffractionangle 28 and the specimen'sorientation. This diffrac-
tion pattern is used to identifythe specimen'scrystallinephases and to measure its
structuralproperties, includingstrain (which is measuredwith great accuracy),epi-
taxy,andthesizeand orientationof crystallites(smallcrystallineregions).XRDcan
also determineconcentration profiles, film thicknesses, and atomic arrangements
in amorphousmaterialsand multilayers. It as0can characterized&ts. Toobtain
this structural and physical information ftom thin films, XRD instruments and
techniquesare designedto maximizethe diffractedX-ray intensities, since the dif-
fractingpower of thin filmsis small.
Rangeof elements
Probingdepth
Detection Limits
Destructive
Depth profiling
All, but not element specific. Low-Zelementsmay be
difficult to detect
Typically a few pm but material dependent; mono-
layer sensitivitywith synchrotronradiation
Material dependent,but -3%in a two phase mixture;
with synchrotronradiationcan be -0.1%
No, for most materials
Normallyno; but thiscanbe achieved.
Samplerequirements Any material, greater than -0.5 an,althoughsmaller
Lateral resolution Normallynone; although 10pmwith microfbcus
Main use
with microfocus
Identification of crystalline phases; determination of
strain, and crystallite orientation and size; accurate
determination of atomicarrangements
Defect imaging and characterization; atomic arrange-
ments in amorphous materials and multilayers; con-
centration profiles with depth; film thickness
measurements
Specializeduses
Instrumentcost $70,000-$200,000
Size Varieswith instrument,greaterthan -70 fc.2
16 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
40. ExtendedX-Ray Absorption
FineStructure (EXAFS) 1.4.2
An EXAFS experimentinvolvesthe irradiation of a samplewith a tunable sourceof
monochromatic X rays from a synchrotron radiation facility.As the X-ray energyis
scanned from just below to well above the binding energy of a core-shell electron
(e.g., K or L) of a selected element, the X-ray photoabsorption process is moni-
tored. When the energy of the incident X-rays is equal to the electron binding
energy, X-ray absorption occurs and a steeply rising absorption edge is observed.
For energies greater than the binding energy, oscillations of the absorption with
incident X-ray energy (i.e., EXAFS) are observed. EXAFS data are characteristicof
the structural distribution of atoms in the immediate vicinity (-5 A) of the X-ray
absorbing element. The frequency of the E M S is related to the interatomic dis-
tance between the absorbingand neighboringatoms. The amplitude of the EXAFS
is related to the number, type, and order of neighboringatoms.
Range of elements
Destructive No
Bonding
information
Accuracy
Detection limits
Depth probed
Depth profiling
Lateralresolution Not yet developed
Imaging/mapping Not yet developed
Sample requirements Virtually any material;solids,liquids,gas
Main use
Instrument cost
Lithium through uranium
Yes,interatomicdistances,coordinationnumbers, atom
types, and structural disorder;oxidationstate by inference
1-2% for interatomic distances; 10-25% for coordi-
nation numbers
Surface,monolayer sensitivity;bulk, > 100ppm
Variable, from8,to pm
Yes,with glancing incidence angles;electron-and
ion-yield detection
Local atomic environmentsof elements in materials
Laboratory Facility, c $300,000; synchrotron beam
line, > $1,000,000
Smallattachment to synchrotron beam lineSize
17
41. Surface ExtendedX-Ray Absorption Fine Structure
and Near EdgeX-Ray Absorption FineStructure
(SEXAFS/NEXAFS) 1.4.3
In Surface Extended X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure and Near Edge X-Ray
Absorption Fine Structure (SEXAFS/NEXAFS) a solid sample, usually placed in
ultrahigh vacuum, is exposed to a tunable beam of X rays from a synchrotron radi-
ation source.Aspectrumis collectedbyvaryingthe photon energyof theX rays and
measuringthe yield of emitted electronsor fluorescentX rays. Analysis of the wig-
gles in the observed spectrum (the SEXAFS features) gives information on nearest
neighbor bond lengths and coordination numbers for atoms at or near the surface.
Features near an absorption edge (NEXAFS) are often characteristic of the local
coordination (octahedral,tetrahedral, etc.) or oxidation state. For adsorbed mole-
cules, NEXAFS resonances characterizethe type of bonding. On a flat surface, the
angular variation of intensity of the resonances gives the orientation of the mole-
cule.
Range of elements
Destructive No
Chemical bonding Yes, through NEXAFS
information
Accuracy In nearest neighbor distance,M.01 with care
Surfacesensitivity Top few monolayers
Detection limits 0.05 monolayer
Lateral resolution -0.5 mm
Imaging/mapping No
Samplerequirements Vacuum-compatiblesolids
Main use of
SEXAFS
Main use of
NEXAFS
Instrument cost
Size
Almost all, from C to U
Adsorbatesubstrate bond lengths
Orientation of molecular adsorbates
$400,000, plus cost of synchrotron
Small attachment to synchrotron beam line
18 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
42. X-Ray Photoelectronand
Auger ElectronDiffraction (XPDandAED) 1.4.4
In X-Ray Photoelectron Diffraction (XPD) and Auger Electron Diffraction
(AED), a single crystalor a textured polycrystallinesample is struck by photons or
electrons to produce outgoing electrons that contain surface chemical and struc-
tural information. The focus of XPD and AED is structural information, which
originates from interference effects as the outbound electrons from a particular
atom are scattered by neighboringatomsin the solid. The electron-atom scattering
processstronglyincreasesthe electron intensityin the forward direction, leadingto
the simpleobservation that intensity maxima occur in directionscorrespondingto
rows of atoms. An energy dispersive angle-resolved analyzer is used to map the
intensity distribution as a function of anglefor elements of interest.
Range of elements
Destructive
Element specific
Chemicalstate
specific
Accuracy
Sitesymmetry
Depth Probed
Depth profiling
Detection limits
Lateral resolution
Imaging/ mapping
All except H and He
XPD no; AED may cause e-beam damage
YeS
Yes,XPD is better than AED
Bond angles to within lo; atomic positions to within
0.05 A
Yes, and usually quickly
5-50 A
Yes, to 30A beneath the surface
0.2 at.%
150A (AED), 150pm (XPD)
Yes
Samplerequirements Primarily single crystals,but also textured samples
Main use To determine adsorption sites and thin-film growth
modes in a chemicallyspecificmanner
Instrument cost $300,000-$600,000
Size 4 m x 4 m x 3 m
19
43. Low-EnergyElectron Diffraction (LEED) 1.4.5
In Low-EnergyElectron Diffraction (LEED)a collimated monoenergetic beam of
electrons in the energy range 10-1000 eV (A = 0.4-4.0 A) is diffracted by a speci-
men surface. In this energy range, the mean free path of electrons is only a few A,
leading to surface sensitivity. The diffraction pattern can be analyzed for the exist-
ence of a clean surface or an ordered overlayer structure. Intensities of diffracted
beams can be analyzed to determine the positions of surfaceatoms relative to each
other and to underlying layers. The shapesof diffracted beams in anglecan be ana-
lyzed to provide information about surfacedisorder. Various phenomena related to
surface crystallography and microstructure can be investigated. This technique
requires a vacuum.
Range of elements
Destructive
Depth probed
Detection limits
Resolvingpower
Lateral resolution
Imaging capability
All elements, but not element specific
No, except in specialcasesof electron-beamdamage
4-20 A
0.1 monolayer; any ordered phase can be detected;
atomic positions to 0.1 step heights to 0.1 A; sur-
facedisorder down to -10%of surfacesites
Maximum resolvable distance for detecting disorder:
typically200 A;best systems, 5 pm
Typical beam sizes,0.1 mm; best systems, -10 pm
Typically, no; with specialized instruments (e.g., low-
energy electron microscopy), 150A
Samplerequirements Single crystals of conductors and semiconductors;
insulators and polycrystalline samples under special
circumstances;0.25 cm2or larger, smallerwith special
effort
Main uses
cost
Size
Analysis of surface crystallography and microstruc-
ture; surfacecleanliness
1$75,000;can be home built cheaply
Generallypart of other systems;if self-standingY-8m2
20 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
44. ReflectionHigh-Energy
Electron Diffraction (RHEED) 1.4.6
In Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED), a beam of high-energy
electrons (typically5-50 kev), is acceleratedtoward the surfaceof a conducting or
semiconducting crystal, which is held at ground potential. The primary beam
strikesthe sampleat a grazingangle (+1-5") and is subsequentlyscattered.Some of
the electronsscatterelastically. Sincetheir wavelengthsare shorter than interatomic
separations, these electrons can diffract off ordered rows of atoms on the surface,
concentrating scattered electrons into particular directions, that depend on row
separations. Beams of scattered electrons whose trajectories intersect a phosphor
screenplaced oppositethe electron gun will excitethe phosphor. The light from the
phosphor screen is called the RHEED pattern and can be recorded with a photo-
graph, television camera, or by some other method. The symmetry and spacing of
the bright features in the RHEED pattern give information on the surfacesymme-
try, lattice constant, and degreeof perfection, i.e., the crystal structure.
Range of elements
Destructive
All, but not chemicalspecific
No, Except for electron-sensitivematerials
Depth probed 2-100 A
Depth profiling No
Lateral resolution
Structural
information sensitiveto structural defects
Samplerequirements Usually single crystal conductor or semiconductor
surfaces
Main use Monitoring surface structures, especially during thin-
film epitaxial growth; can distinguish two-and three-
dimensional defects
Instrument cost $50,000-$200,000
Size
200 pm x 4 mm, in specialcases 0.3 nm x G nm
Measuressurfacecrystal structure parameters,
+25 sq. ft., larger if incorporated with an MBE
chamber
21
45. X-Ray PhotoelectronSpectroscopy (XPS) 1.5.1
In X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy(XPS) monoenergeticsofiX rays bombard a
sample material, causing electrons to be ejected. Identification of the elements
present in the samplecan be made directlyfrom the kineticenergiesof theseejected
photoelectrons. On a finer scale it is also possible to identify the chemical state of
the elementspresent from small variations in the determinedkineticenergies. The
relative concentrationsof elements can be determined from the measured photo-
electronintensities.For a solid,XPS probes2-20 atomiclayers deep, dependingon
the material, the energy of the photoelectron concerned, and the angle (with
respect to the surface) of the measurement. The particular strengths of XPS are
semiquantitative elemental analysis of surfaces without standards, and chemical
state analysis, for materials as diverse as biological to metallurgical. X P S also is
known as electronspectroscopyfor chemicalanalysis (ESCA).
Range of elements
Destructive
Elementalanalysis
Chemicalstate Yes
information
Depth probed 5-50 A
Depth profiling Yes, over the top 50 A; greater depths require sputter
profiling
Depth resolution A fewto severaltens ofA, dependingon conditions
Lateral resolution 5 mm to 75 pm; down to 5 pm in specialinstruments
Sample requirements All vacuum-compatible materials; flat samples best;
sizeaccepted depends on particular instrument
Main uses Determinations of elemental and chemical state wm-
positions in the top 30A
$200,000-$1,000,000,dependingon capabilities
10fi. x 12fi.
All except hydrogen and helium
No, somebeam damageto X-ray sensitivematerials
Yes, semiquantitative without standards; quantitative
with standards. Not a trace element method.
Instrument cost
Size
22 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
46. Ultraviolet PhotoelectronSpectroscopy (UPS) 1.5.2
If monoenergeticphotons in the 10-100 eV energy range strike a samplematerial,
photoelectrons from the valence levels and low-lying core levels (i.e., having lower
binding energy than the photon energy) are ejected. Measurement of the kinetic
energy distribution of the ejected electrons is known as Ultraviolet Photoelectron
Spectroscopy(UPS).The physics of the technique is the sameasXPS, the only dif-
ferencesbeing that much lower photon energiesare used and the primary emphasis
is on examining the valence electron levels, rather than core levels. Owing to this
emphasis, the primary use, when investigatingsolidsurfaces,is for electronicstruc-
ture studiesin surfacephysicsrather than for materialsanalysis.There are,however,
a number of situationswhere UPS offers advantagesover XPS for materialssurface
analysis.
Elemental analysis
Destructive
Chemicalstate
information levels as for XPS
Not usually, sometimesfrom availablecore levels
No, somebeam damageto radiation-sensitivematerial
Yes, but complicated usingvalence levels;for core
Depth probed 2-1 00 A
Depth profiling Yes, over the depth probed; deeper profiling requires
sputter profiling
Lateral resolution Generally none (mm size), but photoelectron micro-
scopeswith capabilitiesdown to the 1-pm range exist
Samplerequirements Vacuum-compatible material; flat samples best; size
accepteddepends on instrumentation
Main use Electronic structure studies of free molecules (gas
phase), well-defined solid surfaces, and adsorbates on
solidsurfaces
No commercial instruments specificallyfor UPS; usu-
ally an add-on to XPS (incrementalcost +$30,000)or
done using a synchrotron ficility as the photon source
10 ft. x 10ft. for a stand-alonesystem
Instrument cost
Size
23
47. Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) 1.5.3
Auger Electron Spectroscopy(AES) uses a focusedelectron beam to createsecond-
ary electronsnear the surfaceof a solid sample. Some of these (theAuger electrons)
have energies characteristic of the elements and, in many cases, of the chemical
bonding of the atoms from which they are released. Because of their characteristic
energies and the shallowdepth from which they escapewithout energy loss, Auger
electrons are able to characterize the elemental composition and, at times, the
chemistryof the surfaces of samples.When used in combination with ion sputter-
ing to gradually remove the surface, Auger spectroscopy can similarly characterize
the samplein depth. The high spacial resolution of the electron beam and the pro-
cessallowsmicroanalysisofthree-dimensionalregionsofsolidsamples.AEShas the
attributes of high lateral resolution, relatively high sensitivity, standardless semi-
quantitative analysis, and chemical bonding information in somecases.
Range of elements
Destructive
All except H and He
No, except to electron beam-sensitive materials and
during depth profiling
Yes, semiquantitative without standards; quantitative
with standards
100ppm for most elements,depending on the matrix
Yes, in many materials
ElementalAnalysis
Absolutesensitivity
Chemicalstate
information?
Depth probed 5-1 00 a
Depth profiling
Lateral resolution
Imaging/mapping
Samplerequirements Vacuum-compatiblematerials
Main use
Instrument cost $100,000-$800,000
Size
Yes, in combination with ion-beam sputtering
300A forAuger analysis, even less for imaging
Yes, called ScanningAuger Microscopy, S A M
Elementalcomposition of inorganicmaterials
10ft. x 15 ft.
24 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
48. ReflectedElectron Energy-Loss
Spectroscopy (REELS) 1.5.4
In Reflected ElectronEnergy-LossSpectroscopy(REELS)a solid specimen, placed
in avacuum, is irradiatedwith a narrowbeam of electronsthat are sufficientlyener-
getic to induce electron excitations with atoms or clusters of atoms. Some of the
incident electrons reemerge from the sample having lost a specific amount of
energyrelative to the well-definedenergyI$,of the incident electron. The number,
direction k,and energy of the emitted electrons can be measured by an electron
energy analyzer. Composition, crystal structure, and chemical bonding informa-
tion can be obtained about the sample’ssurfacefrom the intensityandline shapeof
the emitted electron energy-lossspectra by comparisonto standards.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical band
information
Depth profiling
Quantification
Accuracy
Detection limits
Probing depth
Lateral resolution
Imaging/mapping
Hydrogen to uranium; no isotopes
No
Yes; energeticsand orientation
Yes; tilting or ion sputtering
Standards required
Few percent to tens of percent
Few tenths of a percent
0.07-3.0 nm
100 nm-50 pm; sample independent; not limited by
redifised primaries
Yes, called REELM
Sample requirements Solids; liquids; vacuum compatible; typically
< 2.5 cm-diameter, < 1.5 cm-thickness
Main use Few-monolayerthin-film analysis,e.%.,adsorbate and
very thin-film reactions;submicron detection of metal
hydrides
$0-$700,000, free on any type of electron-excited
Auger spectrometer
None extra overAuger spectrometer
Instrument cost
Size
25
49. X-Ray Fluorescence(XRF) 1.6.1
In X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), an X-ray beam is used to irradiatea specimen, and
the emitted fluorescentX rays are analyzedwith a crystal spectrometer and scintil-
lation or proportional counter. The fluorescentradiation normallyis diffractedby a
crystalat differentanglesto separatetheX-raywavelengthsand thereforeto identify
the elements; concentrations are determined from the peak intensities. For thin
filmsXRF intensity-composition-thickness equationsderivedfrom first principles
are used for the precision determination of compositionand thickness. This can be
done also for each individuallayer of multiple-layerfilms.
Range of elements All but low-Zelements: H, He, and Li
Accuracy kl%for composition, 3%for thickness
Destructive No
Depth sampled
Depth profiling
Detection limits
Sensitivity
Lateral resolution
Chemical bond
information spectra
Samplerequirements 15.0 cm in diameter
Main use Identification of elements; determination of
composition and thickness
Instrument cost $50,000-$300,000
Size
Normally in the 10-pm range, but can be a fewtens of
A in the total-reflection range
Normally no, but possible using variable-inci-
dence X rays
Normally 0.1% in concentration.
10-1 O5 A in thickness can be examined
Normally none, but down to 10 pm using a
microbeam
Normally no, but can be obtained from softX-ray
5 ft. x 8 fi.
26 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
50. Total ReflectionX-Ray Fluorescence
Analysis (TXRF) 1.6.2
In Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis (TXRF), the surface of a solid
specimenis exposed to an X-ray beam in grazinggeometry. The angle of incidence
is kept below the critical anglefor total reflection,which is determined by the elec-
tron density in the specimen surfacelayer, and is on the order of mrad. With total
reflection,only a few nm of the surface layer are penetrated by the X rays, and the
surface is excited to emit characteristicX-ray fluorescence radiation. The energy
spectrum recordedby the detector contains quantitative information about the ele-
mental composition and, especially, the trace impurity content of the surface,e.g.,
semiconductor wafers. TXRF requires a specular surface of the specimen with
regard to the primary X-ray light.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Depth probed
Depth profiling
capability
Quantification
Accuracy
Detection limits
Lateral resolution
Sodium to uranium
No
Not usually
Typically 1-5 nm
Limited (variationof angleof incidence)
Yes
1-20%
10"-1 oi4at/cm2
Limited, typically 10mm
Samplerequirements Specular surhce, typically12.5-cm diameter
Main use Multielement analysis, excellent detection limits for
heavy metals; quantitative measurement of heavy-
metal trace contamination on silicon wafers
Instrument cost $300,000-$600,000
27
51. Particle-InducedX-Ray Emission (PIXE) 1.6.3
Particle-Induced X-Ray Emission (PIXE) is a quantitative, nondestructiveanalysis
technique that relies on the spectrometry of characteristicX rays emitted during
irradiation of a specimen with high-energy ionic particles (-0.3-10 MeV). The
processis analogousto the emissionof characteristicX raysunder electron and pho-
ton bombardment of a specimen (seethe articleson EDS, EMPA, and XRF).With
appropriate corrections, X-ray yields (X rays per particle) can be converted to ele-
mental concentrations.The background X-ray radiationfor PIXE is much less than
that for electron excitation;thus, the detection limits fortraceelementsusing PIXE
is orders of magnitude better. PIXE is best for the analysis of thin samples, suhce
layers, and sampleswith limited amounts of materials, while photon bombardment
(XRF)is better for bulk analysis and thick specimens. Using wavelength-dispersive
detectors, PIXE,EMPA, and XRF can provide identificationof the chemicalbond-
ing of elements. Although EMPA and EDS require that the specimen be in vac-
uum, PIXE and XRF can be performed with the specimen in vacuum or at
atmosphericpressure.
Range of elements
Chemical bonding
information
Depth probed
Depth profiling
Detection limits
Accuracy
Lateral resolution
Imaging/mapping
Lithium to uranium
Yes, when spectralresolution is high
I 1 0 p n
Yes, by varying angle of incidence or particleenergy.
Thin, freestanding foil, 0.1-1 0 ppm; d c e layers on
thick specimens, 10'3-5x10'5 at/cm2; Bulk speci-
mens, 1-100 ppm
-2-1 O%, with standards
-5 pm-2 mm
Yes
Samplerequirements Solids,liquids, and gases
Main use
Systemcost
Systemsize
Fast analysis for many elements, in all materials,
simultaneously
-$ 1,000,000,includingsrnall ionaccelerator(2-MeV H+)
-100sq. ft. floor space
28 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
52. Photoluminescence(PL) 1.7.1
In photoluminescence one measures physical and chemical properties of materials
by using photons to induce excitedelectronicstatesin the materialsystemand ana-
lyzing the optical emission as these statesrelax. Typically,light is directed onto the
sample for excitation, and the emitted luminescence is collected by a lens and
passed through an optical spectrometer onto a photodetector. The spectral distri-
bution and time dependence of the emission are related to electronic transition
probabilitieswithin the sample, and can be used to provide qualitativeand, some-
times, quantitative information about chemical composition, structure (bonding,
disorder, interfaces, quantum wells), impurities, kinetic processes, and energy
transfer.
Destructiveness Nondestructive
Depth probed 0.1-3 pm; limited by light penetration depth and car-
rier diffusion length
Lateral resolution Down to 1-2 pm
Quantitative abilities Intensity-based impurity quantification to several
percent possible; energy quantification very precise
Sensitivity Down to parts-per-trillion level, depending on impu-
rity speciesand host
Imaging/mapping Yes
Samplerequirements Liquid or solid having optical transitions; probe size
2 pm to a few cm
Main uses Band gaps of semiconductors; carrier lifetimes; shal-
low impurity or defect detection; sample quality and
structure
Less than $10,000to over $200,000
Table top to small room
Instrument cost
Size
29
53. ModulationSpectroscopy 1.7.2
Modulation spectroscopy is a powerful experimental method for measuring the
energy of transitions between the filled and empty electronic states in the bulk
(band gaps) or at surfaces of semiconductor materials over a wide range of experi-
mental conditions (temperature, ambients, etc.). By taking the derivative of the
reflectance(or transmittance)of a material in an analogmanner, it producesa series
of sharp, derivative-likespectralfeaturescorrespondingto the photon energyof the
transitions.These energiesaresensitiveto a number of internal and externalparam-
eters such as chemical composition, temperature, strain, and electricand magnetic
fields. The line widths of these spectral features are a function of the quality of the
material.
Destructiveness
Depth probed
Lateral resolution
Image/mapping
Sensitivity
Main uses
Instrument cost
Size
Somemethods are nondestructive
For bulk applications 0.1-1 pm; for surface applica-
tions one monolayer is possible
Down to 100pm
Yes
Alloy composition (e.g., Gal-,&&) Ax = 0.005; car-
rier concentration 1015-1019cm-3
Contactless, nondestructive monitoring of band gaps
in semiconductors; Wide range of temperatures and
ambients (air, ultrahigh vacuum); in-situ monitoring
of semiconductor growth
$30,000-$100,000
For most methods about 2 x 3ft.
30 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
54. Variable-AngleSpectroscopic
Ellipsometry (VASE) 1.7.3
In Variable-AngleSpectroscopicEllipsometry(VA!5E),polarized light strikesa sur-
fa.= and the polarization of the reflected light is analyzed using a second polarizer.
The light beam is highly collimated and monochromatic, and is incident on the
material at an oblique angle. For each angle of incidence and wavelength, the
reflectedlight intensityis measured asa function of polarizationangle, allowingthe
important ellipsometric parameter to be determined. An optimum set of angle of
incidenceand wavelength combinationsis used to maximizemeasurementsensitiv-
ity and information obtained. Physical quantities derivable from the measured
parameter includethe opticalconstantsof bulk or filmed media, the thicknessesof
films (from 1to a fewhundred nm), and the microstructuralcompositionofa mul-
ticonstituent thin film. In general only materials with parallel interfaces, and with
structural or chemical inhomogeneities on a scale less than about 1/ 10 the wave-
length of the incident light, can be studied by ellipsometry.
Main use
Optical range
Samplerequirements Planar materials and interfaces
Destructive No, operation in any transparent ambient, including
vacuum, gases, liquids, and air
Depth probed Light penetration of the material (tensof nm to pm)
Lateral resolution mm normally, 100pm under specialconditions
Image/mapping No
Instrument cost $50,000-$150,000
Size 0.5 rnx 1m
Film thicknesses, microstructure, and optical proper-
ties
Near ultraviolet to mid infrared
31
55. FourierTransform InfraredSpectroscopy (IFTIR) 1.8.1
The vibrational motions of the chemicallybound constituents of matter have fre-
quencies in the infrared regime. The oscillations induced by certain vibrational
modes provide a means for matter to couple with an impinging beam of infrared
electromagneticradiation and to exchange energywith it when the frequenciesare
in resonance. In the infrared experiment, the intensity of a beam of infrared radia-
tion is measured before (10)and after (I)it interactswith the sampleas a hnction of
light frequency, {wi}.A plot of 1/10 versus frequency is the “infrared spectrum.”
The identities, surrounding environments, and concentrations of the chemical
bonds that are present can be determined.
Information
Element Range
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Depth profiling
Depth Probed
Detection limits
Quantification
Reproducibility
Lateralresolution
Imaging/mapping
Vibrationalfrequenciesof chemicalbonds
All, but not element specific
No
Yes, identificationof hnctional groups
No, not under standard conditions
Sampledependent, from pm’s to 10nm
Ranges from undetectable to e lOI3 bonds/cc. Sub-
monolayer sometimes
Standards usually needed
0.1%variation over months
0.5 cm to 20 pm
Available,but not routinely used
Samplerequirements Solid, liquid, or gas in all forms; vacuum not required
Main use Qualitative and quantitative determination of
chemical species, both trace and bulk, for solids
and thin films. Stress, structural inhomogeneity
$50,000-$150,000 for FTIR; $20,000 or more for
non-FT spectrophotometers
Ranges from desktop to (2 x 2 m)
Instrument cost
Instrument size
32 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
56. Raman Spectroscopy 1.8.2
Raman spectroscopy is the measurement, as a function of wavenumber, of the
inelastic light scattering that results from the excitation of vibrations in molecular
and crystalline materials. The excitation source is a single line of a continuous gas
laser,which permits optical microscope optics to be used for measurement of sam-
ples down to a few pm. Raman spectroscopyis sensitive to molecular and crystal
structure; applications include chemical fingerprinting, examination of single
grains in ceramics and rocks, single-crystal measurements, speciation of aqueous
solutions, identification of compounds in bubbles and fluid inclusions, investiga-
tions of structure and strain states in polycrystalline ceramics, glasses, fibers, gels,
and thin and thick films.
Information
Element range
Destructive
Lateral resolution
Depth profiling
Depth probed
Detection limits
Quantitative
Imaging
Vibrational Frequencies of chemical bonds
All, but not element specific
No, unless sampleis susceptibleto laser damage
1 pm with microfocus instruments
Limited to transparent materials
Few pm to mm, depending on material
1000A normally, submonolayerin specialcases
With difficulty;usuallyqualitativeonly
Usually no, although imaging instruments have been
built
Samplerequirements Very flexible: liquids, gases, crystals, polycrystalline
solids, powders, and thin films
Main use Identification of unknown compounds in solutions,
liquids, and crystalline materials; characterization of
structural order, and phase transitions
Instrument cost $150,00O-$250,000
Size 1.5 m x 2.5 m
33
57. High-ResolutionElectron Energy LossSpectroscopy
(HREELS) 1.8.3
In High-Resolution Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (HREELS), a highly
monoenergeticbeam of low energy (1-10 eV) electrons is focused onto a sample’s
surface, and the scatteredelectronsare analyzed with high resolution of the scatter-
ing energy and angle. Some of the scattered electrons suffer small characteristic
energylossesdue to vibrational excitation of surface atoms and molecules.A vibra-
tional spectrum can be obtained by counting the number of electrons versus the
electron energy loss relative to the elastically scattered (no energy loss) electron
beam. This spectrum is used mainly to identify chemical species (functional
groups) in the first layer of the surface. Often this layer contains adsorbed species
on a solid.
Information
Main use
Range of elements
Bonding
Detection limits
Quantification
Depth probed
Lateral resolution
Molecularvibrational frequencies
Nondestructive identification of the molecular hnc-
tional groupspresent at surfaces
Not element specific
Any chemical bonds that have vibrations in the
range 50-4000 cm-l
0.1% monolayer for strong vibrational bands
Difficult, possible with standards
2 nm
1 mm2
Samplerequirements Single-crystal samples of conductors best; other solid
samples are suitable, including polycrystalline metals,
polymeric materials, semiconductors, and insulators,
ultrahigh vacuum compatible;typically2 5mm diam-
eter, 1-3 mm thick
Instrument cost $100,000 plus associated techniques and vacuum
system
Size Attaches to vacuum chamber by 8-14 inch diameter
flange.
34 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
58. Solid State Nuclear MagneticResonance (NMR) 1.8.4
Solidstate Nuclear MagneticResonance (NMR) exploitsthe interaction of nuclear
magnetic moments with electromagneticwaves in the radio frequency region. In
the experiment, a solid specimen (crystallineor amorphous, aligned or randomly
oriented) is placed in a strong external magnetic field (typically 1-14 Tesla) and
irradiated with intense radio frequency pulses over a frequency range required to
excite a specific atomic nucleus from the ground magnetic (spin) state to another
higher state. As the nucleus releases back to its ground state the sample re-emits a
radio signal at the excitation frequency, which is detected by electromagnetic
induction and Fourier transformed to yield a plot of intensity versus frequency.
The spectrum thus obtained identifiesthe presenceof the atom and its relativecon-
centration (with standards) and is a sensitive indicator of structural and chemical
bonding properties. It can servefor phase identificationaswell as for the character-
ization of local bonding environments in disorderedmaterials.
Elementsdetected
Detection limit
Surfacesensitivity
Typicalsamplesize
Measurement
conditions
Sampleform
Main use
Instrument cost
Spacerequirement
All elementspossessingan isotopewith a suitablemag-
netic dipole moment (about half the elements in the
periodic table)
On the order of 1018 atoms of the nuclear isotope
studied
Not intrinsically surface sensitive: Surface areas
> 10m2/g required or desirablefor surfacestudies
10-500 mg, varies greatly with the nucleus studied;
samplelength, 0.5-5 cm; width, 0.5-2 cm
Usuallyat ambient temperature and pressure
Powder, single crystal, randomly oriented, or aligned
film
Element-selectivephase identification and quantifica-
tion, structural characterization of disorderedstates
$200,000-$1,200,000, depending mostly on the field
strength desired
300 ft.2
35
59. RutherfordBackscatteringSpectrometry (RBS) 1.9.1
Rutherford BackscatteringSpectrometry(RBS) analysisis performed by bombard-
ing a sample target with a monoenergetic beam of high-energy particles, typically
helium, with an energyof a few MeV. A fraction of the incident atomsscatterback-
wards from heavier atoms in the near-surface region of the target material,and usu-
ally are detected with a solid state detector that measures their energy. The energy
of a backscatteredparticle is related to the depth and mass of the target atom, while
the number of backscattered particles detected from any given element is propor-
tional to concentration. This relationship is used to generate a quantitative depth
profile of the upper 1-2 pm of the sample. Alignment of the ion beam with the
crystallographic axes of a sample permits crystal damage and lattice locations of
impurities to be quantitativelymeasured and depth profiled. The primary applica-
tions of RBS are the quantitative depth profilingof thin-film structures, crystailin-
ity, dopants, and impurities.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Quantification
Detection limits
Lateralresolution
Depth profiling
Depth resolution
Maximum depth
Imaging/mapping
Lithium to uranium
+ 10l3 He atomsimplanted;radiationdamage.
No
Yes, standardless;accuracy5-20%
1012-1016 atoms/cm2; 1-10 at.% for 1ow-z ele-
ments; 0-100 ppm for high-Zelements
1 4 mm, 1pm in specialized equipment
Yes and nondestructive
2-30 nm
-2 pn, 20 pm with H+
Under development
Samplerequirements Solid,vacuum compatible
Main use
Instrument cost $450,000-$1,000,000
Size 2 m x 7 m
Nondestructive depth profiling of thin films, crystal
damage information
36 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
60. ElasticRecoilSpectrometry (ERS) 1.9.2
Energetic recoil ions, 'H+and 2H+,are produced when 4He+ions having energies
in the MeV range undergo elasticnucleus-nucleus collisionswithin a hydrogen- or
deuterium-containingsolidsample.Energyspectrometryof the recoilingions iden-
tifiestheir mass and depth of origin. The total hydrogen content of a thin layer may
be determined directly from the recoil fluence. In combination with Rutherford
Backscattering(RBS)analysisof the samesample,elasticrecoilspectraprovidecon-
centration profiles and complete compositional analysis of near-surface regions of
the sample material. ERS requires equipment common to RES analysis. It is the
simplestion beam techniqueforhydrogenprofiling,sinceion backscattering(RBS)
from hydrogen is not possible.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Quantitation
Sensitivity
Depth probed
Depth profiles
Depth resolution
Lateral resolution
Unique selectionof 'H, 2H
Radiationdamage may releaseH in polymers
None
Absolute atoms/cm2 f2% typically
5 x 1013atom/cm2 or 0.01at.% (typically)
5 1pm typically
Yes; concentration profile to f 1% relative
Varies with depth; 300-600 8,at depth 1000Ain Si
1-4 mm typically
Samplerequirements Solid,vacuum compatible,dimensions2 5mm
Main use Determination of H concentrations in thin fdms;
rapid; matrix-independent
Instrument cost As for RBS; MeV accelerator ($1,000,000-
$1,500,000);servicesavailable
Size Requires laboratory 2 20 ft. x 50 ft., depending on
instrument
37
61. Medium-Energy Ion Scatteringwith
Channeling and Blocking (MEIS) 1.9.3
Medium-Energy Ion Scattering (MEIS)with channeling and blocking is a quanti-
tative, real space,nondestructivetechnique for studyingthe composition and struc-
ture of surfices and interfacesburied up to a fav atomic layers below the surface.
Single-crystal or epitaxial samples are required for the structural determinations.
The basic quantities measured are the energyand angulardistribution of backscat-
tered ions in the 50-400 keV range. The technique has elemental and depth sensi-
tivity. The ion angular distributions are characterized by minima (dips) in
intensity, the positions of which are closely connected to the relative positions of
atoms in the surface layer. MEIS is more surfice sensitive, and more complex
instrumentally than other surfice ion spectroscopies, though interpretation is
straightforward. The technique is useful for the analysis of all ultrahigh vacuum
compatiblesolids, and in particularmetals, semiconductors,and overlayerson such
suhces (submonolayer adsorbateconcentrations, thin filmsof silicides,etc.).
Elementsdetected
Elementalsensitivity
Chemicalsensitivity
Depth probed
Depth resolution
Quantification
Lateralresolution
Destructive
Samplerequirements
Main uses
Accuracy
cost
Size
all elements
Scales as the square of nuclear charge; best for heavy
elements(e 1 0 4 monolayer); poor for hydrogen
None
Typically4-5 atomiclayers,but up to 200A in special
cases
Optimally on a monolayer level
Absolute technique for elementalconcentrations
None
Not inherently
Ultrahigh vacuum compatibility;practical size -1 cm
in diameter
Determination of structural parameters of surfices
and interfaces;very high resolutiondepth profiling
> 1% (structural parameters); element dependent
(composition)
$1,000,000-$2,000,000
- 7 m x 3 m
38 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
62. Ion Scattering Spectroscopy (ISS) 1.9.4
In Ion Scattering Spectroscopy(ISS) a low-energy monoenergetic beam of ions is
focusedonto a solidsurfaceand the energyof the scatteredions ismeasuredat some
fixed angle.The collision of the inert ion beam, usually3He+,4He+,or 20Ne+,fol-
lows the simple laws of conservation of momentum for a binary elastic collision
with an atom in the outer surface ofthe solid. The energy loss thus identifies the
atom struck. Inelasticcollisionsand ions that penetrate deeper than the first atomic
layer normallydo not yield a sharp, discretepeak. Neighboring atoms do not affect
the signal because the kinetics of the collision are much shorter than bond vibra-
tions. A spectrum is obtained by measuring the number of ions scattered from the
surficeas a function of their energyby passingthe scatteredions through an energy
analyzer. The spectrum is normally plotted as a ratio of the number of ions of
energy Eversus the energy of the primary beam 4.This can be directly converted
to a plot of relative concentration versus atomic number, 2. Extremely detailed
information regardingthe changesin elementalcomposition from the outer mono-
layer to depths of 50A or more are routinely obtained by continuously monitoring
the spectrum while slowlysputtering away the surface.
Range of elements
Samplerequirements Any solidvacuum-compatible material
All but helium; hydrogen indirectly
Sensitivity
Quantitation
Speed
Depth of analysis
Lateral resolution
Imaging
Sampledamage
Main uses
Instrument cost
Size
c 0.01 monolayer, 0.5% for C to 50 ppm for heavy
metals
Relative; 0.5-20%
Singlespectrum, 0.1s; nominal 100-Aprofile, 30 min
Outermost monatomic layer to any sputtered depth
150pm
Yes, limited
Only if done with sputter profiling
Exclusive detection of outer most monatomic layer
and very detailed depth profilesof the top 100A
$25,000-$150,000
10ft. x 10fi.
39
63. DynamicSecondary Ion Mass Spectrometry
(DynamicSIMS) 1.10.1
In Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), a solid specimen, placed in a vac-
uum, is bombarded with a narrow beam of ions, called primary ions, that are suffi-
cientlyenergeticto cause ejection (sputtering)of atoms and small clusters of atoms
from the bombarded region. Some of the atoms and atomic clusters are ejected as
ions, called secondary ions. The secondary ions are subsequentlyaccelerated into a
massspectrometer,wherethey areseparated accordingto their mass-to-chargeratio
and counted. The relative quantities of the measured secondaryions are converted
to concentrations, by comparison with standards, to reveal the composition and
trace impurity content of the specimen as a function of sputteringtime (depth).
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Quantification
Accuracy
Detection limits
Depth probed
Depth profiling
Lateral resolution
Imaging/mapping
H to U; all isotopes
Yes, material removed during sputtering
In rare cases,from molecular clusters, but see
StaticSIMS
Standardsusuallyneeded
2% to factor of 2 for concentrations
10'~-10'~atoms/cm3 (ppb-ppm)
2 nm-100 pm (depends on sputter rate and data col-
lection time)
Yes, by the sputteringprocess; resolution 2-30 nm
50 nm-2 pm; 10nm in specialcases
Yes
Samplerequirements Solid conductorsand insulators, typicallyI2.5 cm in
diameter, I 6 mm thick, vacuum compatible
Main use Measurement of composition and of trace-level impu-
rities in solid materials a hnction of depth, excellent
detection limits, good depth resolution
Instrument cost $500,000-$1,500,000
Size 10fi. x 15fi.
40 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
64. Static Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry
(StaticSIMS) 1.10.2
Static SecondaryIon Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) involves the bombardment of a
sample with an energetic (typically 1-10 kev) beam of particles, which may be
either ions or neutrals.As a result of the interaction of these primary particles with
the sample, species are ejected that have become ionized. These ejected species,
known as secondaryions, are the analyticalsignal in SIMS.
In static SIMS, the use of a low dose of incident particles (typically less than
5 x 10l2atoms/cm2) is critical to maintain the chemical integrity of the sample
surface during analysis. A mass spectrometer sorts the secondary ions with respect
to their specificcharge-to-massratio, therebyproviding a mass spectrum composed
of fragment ions of the varioushnctional groups or compounds on the samplesur-
face. The interpretation of these characteristicfragmentation patterns results in a
chemicalanalysisof the outer few monolayers.The abilityto obtain surfacechemi-
cal information is the key feature distinguishing static SIMS from dynamic SIMS,
which profilesrapidlyinto the sample,destroyingthe chemicalintegrityof the sam-
ple.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Depth probed
Lateral resolution
Imaging/mapping
Quantification
Massrange
H to U; aI1isotopes
Yes, if sputtered long enough
Yes
Outer 1or 2 monolayers
Down to -100pm
Yes
Possiblewith appropriate standards
Typically, up to 1000 amu (quadrupole), or up to
10,000amu (time of flight)
Samplerequirements Solids, liquids (dispersed or evaporated on a sub-
strate), or powders; must be vacuum compatible
Main use Surface chemical analysis, particularly organics, poly-
mers
Instrument cost $500,000-$750,000
Size 4 ft. x 8 ft.
41
65. Surface Analysis by Laser Ionization (SALI) 1.10.3
In SurfaceAnalysis by Laser Ionization (SALI),a probe beam such as an ion beam,
electron beam, or laser is directed onto a surfaceto removea sampleof material.An
untuned, high-intensity laser beam passes parallel and close to but above the sur-
face. The laser has sufficient intensity to induce a high degreeof nonresonant, and
hence nonselective,photoionization of the vaporizedsampleof material within the
laser beam. The nonselectively ionized sample is then subjected to mass spectral
analysis to determine the nature of the unknown species. SALI spectra accurately
reflect the surface composition, and the use of time-of-flight mass spectrometers
provides fast, efficientand extremelysensitiveanalysis.
Range of elements
Destructive
Post ionization
approaches
Information
Detection limit
Quantification
Dynamic range
Probing depth
Lateralresolution
Mass range
Hydrogen to Uranium
Yes,surfacelayers removed during analysis
Multiphoton ionization (MPI), single-photon
ionization (SPI)
Elementalsurfaceanalysis (MPI);molecularsurface
analysis (SPI)
PPm to PPb
-10%usingstandards
Depth profile mode -1O4
2-5
down to 60 nm
1-10,000 amu or greater
(to several pm in profilingmode)
Samplerequirements Solid,vacuum compatible, anyshape
Main uses
Instrument cost $600,000-$1,000,000
Quantitative depth profiling, molecular analysisusing
SPI mode; imaging
Size Approximately45 sq. fi.
42 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARIES Chapter 1
66. Sputtered NeutralMass Spectrometry (SNMS) 1.10.4
Sputtered Neutral Mass Spectrometry (SNMS) is the mass spectrometric analysis
of sputtered atoms ejectedfrom a solidsurfaceby energeticion bombardment. The
sputtered atoms are ionized for mass spectrometricanalysis by a mechanism sepa-
rate from the sputtering atomization.Assuch,SNMS is complementaryto Second-
ary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), which is the mass spectrometric analysis of
sputtered ions, as distinct from sputtered atoms.Theforte of SNMS analysis, com-
pared to SIMS, is the accurate measurement of concentration depth profiles
through chemicallycomplex thin-film structures, including inte&ces, with excel-
lent depth resolution and to trace concentration levels. Genericallyboth SAL1and
GDMS are specific examplesof SNMS. In this articlewe concentrate on post ion-
ization only by electron impact.
Range of elements Li to U
Destructive Yes, surfacematerial sputtered
Chemical bonding None
information
Quantification
Detection limits 10-100 ppm
Depth probed
Depth profiling Yes, by sputtering
Lateral resolution
Yes, accuracy x 3 without standards; 5-10% with
analogousstandard; 30%with dissimilarstandard
15A (to many pm when profiling)
A few mm in direct plasma sputtering; 0.1-10 pn
using separate,focusedprimary ion-beam sputtering
Imaging/mapping Yes, with separate, focusedprimary ion-beam
Samplerequirements Solid conducting material, vacuum compatible; flat
wafer up to 5-mm diameter;insulatoranalysispossible
Main use Complete elemental analysis of complex thin-film
structures to several pm depth, with excellent depth
resolution
cost $200,000-$450,000
Size 2.5 ft. x 5 ft.
43
67. Laser Ionization Mass Spectrometry (LIMS) 1.10.5
In Laser Ionization Mass Spectrometry (LIMS, also LAMMA, LAMMS, and
LIMA), a vacuum-compatiblesolid sample is irradiated with short pulses (+lons)
of ultravioletlaser light. The laser pulse vaporizesa microvolume of material,and a
fraction of the vaporized species are ionized and accelerated into a time-of-flight
mass spectrometer which measures the signal intensity of the mass-separated ions.
The instrument acquiresa completemass spectrum, typically coveringthe range 0-
250 atomic mass units (amu), with each laser pulse. A survey analysisof the mate-
rial is performed in thisway. The relative intensitiesof the signalscan be converted
to concentrations with the use of appropriate standards, and quantitative or semi-
quantitative analysesare possible with the use of such standards.
Range of elements
Destructive
Chemical bonding
information
Quantification Standards needed
Detection limits
Depth probed
Depth profiling
Lateralresolution 3-5 pm
Mapping capabilities No
Samplerequirements Vacuum-compatible solids; must be able to absorb
ultraviolet radiation
Main use Survey capability with ppm detection limits, not
affected by surfacechargingeffects; complete elemen-
tal coverage; survey microanalysis of contaminated
areas, chemicalfailure analysis
Instrument cost $400,000
Size 9 fi. x 5 fi.
Hydrogen to uranium; all isotopes
Yes, on a scaleof fewmicrometersdepth
Yes, depending on the laser irradiance
10'~-10'~at/cm3 (ppm to 100ppm)
variablewith material and laser power
Yes, repeated laser shots sampleprogressivelydeeper
layers; depth resolution 50-100 nm
44 INTRODUCTIONAND SUMMARIES Chapter 1