80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
La terapia con anti TNF alfa nella Malattia di Crohn - Gastrolearning®
1. La terapia con anti TNF alfa nella
Malattia di Crohn
Relatore: Dott. A. Orlando (Palermo)
LUNEDI 9 FEBBRAIO
ORE 15.30
2. Goals of therapy in IBDs
• Inducing/maintaining remission
• Prevention of PO recurrence
• Steroid weaning
• Restore and maintain nutrition
• Maintain quality of life
• Select optimal timing for surgery
10 years ago …
• Early and rapid treatment
• Prevention of PO lesions
• Minimize drug toxicity (optimal safety)
• Sustained mucosal healing
• Prevention complications
• Prevention hospitalisations and surgeries
• Long term steroid-free (deep) remission
• Prevention or Reduce long term disability
... today
Treat symptoms,
induce remission and
treat on flare
Treat symptoms
and lesions (early)
with long term
strategy
3. Knowledge Required To Treat Patients
With Crohn’s Disease (or UC)
1. Classification2. Natural History3. Results of RCTs
• High Placebo Remission rate
18% (95% CI 14%–24%) (range 0%-50%) Su 2004
17% (95% CI 13 – 21%) (range 0%-34%) Tinè 2008
• No clinical trial ever completely reflects what is
happening in an individualized patient
Lloyd F. Mayer
RG A 12% 12%
RG B 36% 29%
RG C 19% 18%
RG D 32% 40%
115 statements
234 reccomendations
(diagnosis & management)
47 statements
103 reccomendations
(anti TNFα therapy)
4. Guidelines
The majority of reccomendations
are based on expert opionions !
4. Crohn’s Disease is not a 6-week
diseases !
Lifelong management and strategies
are necessary
5. Evolution of Therapeutic Approach in IBDs
Immunomodulators
Biologics
Surgery
Aminosalycilates
Antibiotics
Systemic steroids
MILD
SEVERE
MODERATE
Topically acting
steroids
New
drugs
New
strategies
Tailored
treatment
6. Time trends in supply 5-ASA, IM, steroid (left axis) and
infliximab prevalence (right axis) for Crohn’s disease
Time trends in the prevalence of prolonged steroid
exposure and in the rates of hospitalization and surgery for
Crohn’s disease
7. Systemic Corticosteroids Story
Observational studies 1990-2000
Munkholm 1994, Faubion 2001 Lichtenstein, 2006
Population Based Studies TREAT Registry
100
20
40
60
80
0
1 month 1 year
RESPONSE
REFRACTORY
RESPONSE
REFRACTORY
DEPENDENCY
SURGERY
100
20
40
60
80
0
1 month 1 year
RESPONSE
REFRACTORY
RESPONSE
REFRACTORY
DEPENDENCY
SURGERY
8. Timeline with the milestones in CTs development
in CD before the advent on anti-TNF agents
Hindryckx P et al JCC 2014 May
CTs: Clinical Trials; RCT: Randomized controlled trials, NCCDS: National Cooperative Crohn’s disease study;
CDAI: Crohn’s disease activity index; ECCDS: European cooperative Crohnìs disease study; CDEIS: Crohn’s
disease endoscopic activity index of severity
9. Definition of Outcomes
Luminal Crohn’s disease
Clinical response
CDAI reduction > 70 points from the baseline
CDAI reduction > 70 points + at least 25% reduction from the baseline
Clinical remission
CDAI < 150
Steroid sparing
Clinical remission (CDAI < 150) and off steroids
Mucosal healing
Mucosal ulceration at wk 0 and no mucosal ulceration at follow-up
Deep remission
Defined as clinical remission (CDAI <150) and complete MH
10. Orlando A. et al. Digestive and Liver Disease 2011; 43: 1–20
GOALS OF MANAGEMENT IN CROHN’S DISEASE
16. Overview of the evolution of primary endpoints of CTs
in luminal CD
Hindryckx P et al JCC 2014 May
17. Forest plot of randomized controlled trials of anti-TNFα
antibodies vs placebo in inducing remission in active
luminal CD
Forest plot of randomized controlled trials of anti-TNFα
antibodies vs placebo in preventing relapse in
quiescent CD
Ford et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:644-59
18. 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
ACCENT I
51% steroids at entry
pla
CHARM
44% steroids at entry
pla
5mg/kg
10mg/kg
40mg eow
40mg weekly
STEROID SPARING EFFECT
(CORTICOSTEROID FREE REMISSION AT 1 YEAR)
19. 90 -
80 -
70 -
60 -
50 -
40 -
30 -
20 -
10 -
0 -
Response rate
Remission rate
Week 6
%patients
45.5%
100 -
45.5%
90 -
80 -
70 -
60 -
50 -
40 -
30 -
20 -
10 -
0 -
Response rate
Remission rate
%patients
64.5%
100 -
16,4%
End of follow up (14.6 ± 10 months)
Orlando A. et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:826-831
110 steroid-dependent pts treated with ADA (80/40 or 160/80 mg eow, followed by 40 mg eow).
Clinical remission: steroid discontinuation without symptomatic recurrence.
Clinical response: reduction or maintenance of the initial CDAI value reducing steroid dosage but
without its discontinuation.
20. Orlando A et al. Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 43:1-20
Van Assche G et al JCC 2010
22. 1)
2)
3)
smoking should be discouraged in all patients
Maintenance of medically induced remission guidelines
23. Evolving goals of therapy for Crohn’s disease:
“sustained steroid clinical free remission”
Response
Steroid free
Remission
Goal Clinical parameters
Improved symptoms
No symptoms
Normal labs
Outcomes
Improved QoL
Decreased
hospitalisation
SUSTAINED
24. 2
How will Sustained Clinical-Steroid Free
Remission as a management goal affect patients
with early or late disease?
• Disease duration may alter treatment goals
– Late disease has inflammatory and non-inflammatory
symptoms
• Definition of SCSFR may be different for different patient
types
– e.g. absence of symptoms in early CD, and improvement in
symptoms in late CD
26. The earlier, the better ?
1) Indirect evidence from rheumatology – early RA (e.g. BeSt Study)
2) Indirect evidence from pediatric studies
3) Indirect evidence and post-hoc analyses from adult studies
4) SUTD, SONIC, POST-OP
27. Longitudinal course of rheumatoid arthritis
Kirwan JR. J Rheumatol 2001
Disease duration (years)
Disability
Radiographs
Inflammation
Severity
(arbitraryunits)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Early RA Intermediate Late
Klareskog L, et al. Lancet 2009
28. Anti-TNF alpha in pediatric and adult luminal CD
Hanauer S, et al. Lancet 2002; Hyams J, et al. Gastroenterology 2007; Colombel JF, et al Gastroenterology 2007; Hyams J, et al. ECCO 2011
39
28
40
59,6
55,8
39
57
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
IFX ACCENT/REACH
wk 30 remission
IFX ACCENT/REACH
wk 54 remission
ADA CHARM/PED
wk 26 remission
%remission
Adult CD Ped CD
Disease duration: adult ~8 yr – pediatric ~2 yr
29. Adapted from Schreiber S, et al. Gastroenterol 2007;132(4 Suppl 2):A-147
Patients in remission, week 56: <2 years placebo n=4/23, adalimumab n=20/39; 2 to <5 years placebo n=4/36, adalimumab
n=25/57; ≥5 years placebo n=12/111, adalimumab n=82/233. Data are from randomised responders
Patients received induction therapy of adalimumab 80 mg (week 0) followed by 40 mg (week 2) and were randomised at week 4
Week 56
0
20
40
60
80
100
Patientswithremission(%)
23n= 39
<2 years
17%
51%
36 57
2 to <5 years
11%
44%
111 233
≥5 years
11%
35%
p=0.014 p=0.001 p<0.001
Placebo
All adalimumab
Time from diagnosis to anti-TNF
CHARM: Early Adalimumab Use is Associated with Higher
Rate of Remission than Later Use
Post-hoc analysis
30. IFX (0,2,6 wk)
AZA (2-2.5 mg/kg)
133 CD < 4 yrs duration
CDAI>220
GCS/ISS/IFX naive
Failure
Failure
STEP-UP
n=66
Bud 9 mg/die
mPred 32mg/die
ISS
IFX
TOP DOWN
n=67
IFX
CS
Primary endpoint CDAI<150 off steroids, no resection
31. D’Haens G, et al. Lancet 2008
Early combined immunosuppression vs conventional
management of newly diagnosed CD
and follow up through year 3 and 4
73,1
30,4
0
20
40
60
80
100
TD SU
%
MH at 2 years
p=0.003
62,5
18,2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Complete mucosal healing (SES=0 at year 2)
Endoscopic activity (SES=1-9 at year 2)
OR 4.88 (95% CI 1.1-
20.8) P=0.032
Clinical remission, no steroids, no
resections and no anti-TNF
through Year 3+4
Baert F, et al. Gastroenterology 2010
p=0.031 (log-rank test)
0
20
40
60
80
100
14 20 26 32 38 44 50 56 62 68 74 80 86 92 98104
Weeks after randomisation
Patientswithnorelapse(%)
//
Top down
Step up
Weeks from diagnosis to treatment
2.0 (1–5) - 2.5 (1–11)
32. Early treatment in Crohn’s disease
Orlando A et al. Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 43:1-20
Van Assche G et al JCC 2010
33. OR (95%CI)
0,2 0,5 1 2 5 10 100 1000
Precise II Response 26 wks
Precise I Response wk 6 & 26
Precise1 Response wk 6
Gain Remission 4 wks
Classic II (open cohort) Remission 56 wks
Classic II (randomised cohort) Remission 56 wks
Charm Remission 56 wks
Charm Remission 26 wks
Classic 1 Remission 4 wks
Rutgeerts 1999 Response 48 wks
ACCENT I Remission 54 wks
ACCENT I Response 54 wks
Concomitant
Immunomodulators
No concomitant
Immunomodulators
ODDS RATIO FOR RESPONSE/REMISSION IN PATIENTS WITH AND
WITHOUT CONCOMITANT IMMUNOMODULATORS
Subgroup analysis from RCTs Infliximab Adalimumab & Certolizumab
“It’s OK to perform
subgroup analysis…….
as long as you don’t
believe the results”
Rory Collins
University of Oxford
34. Karmiris K, et al. Gastroenterology 2009
Anti-TNF alpha and concomitant IM (Leuven)
Schnitzler F, et al. Gut 2009
IFX ADA
35. • > 21 years of age
• Active CD (CDAI 220-450)
• ISS and biologics naive
• steroid-dependent
(CDAI >220 after steroid dose reduction)
• being considered for a second steroid
course within 12 mo
• No response to mesalamine
(≥2.4 g for 4 wks)
• No response to budesonide
(≥6 mg for 4 wks)
SONIC
(n. 508)
50
n. 204
36. To combine or not to combine ?
Van Assche G et al JCC 2010 Orlando A et al. Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 43:1-20
37. All patients: 854
Patients treated with corticosteroids at baseline: 376 (44%)
Colombel et al. Gastroenterology 2007;132:52-65
38. Up to 4 years!!
Panaccione R et al Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013
Long-Term Maintenance of Clinical Remission
(ADHERE)
39. Panaccione et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther .Sep 2013
Sustained steroid-free clinical remission with ADA
after 4 years of therapy for Crohn’s disease
(ADHERE)
Patients who achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission at the end of CHARM
and maintained corticosteroid-free clinical remission over time.
40. Patients who received a reinduction
dosage (160/80 mg)
Clinical remission
26/110 (24%)
13/26 (50%)
Patients who received a weekly
maintaining treatment (40 mg)
Clinical remission
28/110 (25%)
14/28 (50%)
Patients who obtained a mucosal healing
(60 patients underwent colonoscopy) 15/60 (25%)
Patients who were switched to infliximab
Clinical remission
16/110 (14%)
11/16 (69%)
Patients who were operated on 19/110 (17%)
Patients in maintaining treatment: 54/110 (49%)
Patients who stopped treatment because of mucosal healing: 6/110 (5,4%)
Results
Long Term Adalimumab Efficacy In Steroid-dependent
Crohn’s Disease Patients
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Patients(%)
32%
54%
Follow up (38.6 ± 10 months)
14%
60/110 35/110 15/110
Maintaining clinical remission
Stop for ineffectiveness
Stop for side effects
Orlando A. et al. Unpublished data 2013
Up to 3 years!!
41. Results
Long Term Adalimumab Efficacy In Steroid-dependent
Crohn’s Disease Patients
Univariable analysis
p-value OR (95% CI)
Induction dosage vs maintaining clinical remission p = 0.06 2.01 (0.944-4.266)
42. Results
Long Term Adalimumab Efficacy In Steroid-dependent
Crohn’s Disease Patients
Univariable analysis
p-value OR (95% CI)
Induction dosage vs maintaining clinical remission p = 0.06 2.01 (0.944-4.266)
Induction dosage vs treatment with infliximab p = 0.73 1.22 (0.39–3.76)
Induction dosage vs mucosal healing p = 0.27 1.98 (0.57-6.85)
Induction dosage vs surgery at follow up p = 0.04 0.311 (0.969-0.998)
Induction dosage vs response to infliximab P <0.001 6 (1.01-35.91)
A higher induction regimen (160/80 mg) was associated with a lower risk of surgery
A lower induction regimen (80/40 mg) was associated with a best response to infliximab
Orlando A. et al. Unpublished data 2013
43.
44. Sustained benefit from IFX/ADA in CD
(Leuven)
Schnitzler F, et al. Gut 2009
Drop of CRP as predictor of sustained clinical benefit
Karmiris K, et al. Gastroenterology 2009
168 CD patients with LOR or intolerant
to IFX treated with ADA: 61.5% with
sustained clinical benefit at median FU
(20.4 months IQR 12-30)
547 CD treated with IFX: 63.4% with
sustained clinical benefit at median FU
(55 months IQR 27-83);
45. Jurgens M, et al. CGH 2011
Patients with relapse leading to stop of therapy
All patients
All patients with clinical relapse
Tight-control: CRP levels in responders and non-responders to
infliximab
46. BIOLOGICS IN CROHN’S DISEASE
Anti-TNFα antibodies vs. placebo in healing of fistulizing CD
Ford et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:644-59
47. 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
23%
Placebo
Infliximab
Chiusura fistola a 54
settimane
Risposta a 54
settimane
ACCENT II: N Engl J Med 2004
46%
19%
36%
Infliximab 5 mg/kg Sett. 0 – 2 -6
Sett. 14 Randomizzatione dei
responders:
- Infliximab 5 mg/kg
- Placebo
Infliximab
(n=282)
%pazienti
(n=195) (175 fistole perianali)
Malattia perianale – Terapia con anti-TNF
Ascesso perianale nel 12% dei pazienti trattati con Infliximab
48. ADA combined with CIPRO is superior to ADA monotherapy in
perianal fistula closure in Crohn’s disease: a randomised, double-
blind, placebo controlled trial (ADAFI)
76 CD patients with
active perianal
fistulusing disease.
ADA induction 160/80
w 0,2 and after 40
eow with CIPRO o
Placebo.
Primary outcome:
response and remission
at w 12
Univariate analysis showed that outcome was not influenced by any of the patients caracteristics
Dewint P et al. GUT 2014; 63:292-99
49. Biological immunomodulators improve the healing rate in
surgically treated perianal Crohn’s fistulas
(Cleveland Clinic)
El Gazzaz G et al. Colorectal Disease 2012; 14: 1217-
218 CD patients with
active perianal
fistulusing disease.
Group A:
surgery 54 %
Group B:
surgery+biologics 46%
Mean Follow-up 3.2 ys
50. Orlando A et al. Disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Sep 13
51. MUCOSAL HEALING AND ANTI-TNFα
Beppu T. et al. Digestive Endoscopy 2015; 27: 73–81
52. Rutgeerts P et al. Gastroenterology 2012;142:1102-
MUCOSAL HEALING AND ANTI-TNFα
135 pts received ADA160/80 mg at weeks 0/2
At week 4 they were assigned to ADA 40 mg or placebo eow through
week 52
53. Colombel JG et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1383-95
MUCOSAL HEALING AND ANTI-TNFα
54. D'Haens G et al. Lancet 2008;371:660–7
Peyrin-Biroulet L. et al. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis (2011) 5, 477–483
55. Baert F et al. Gastroenterology 2010;138:463–8
61. Bouguen G et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:978-85
MUCOSAL HEALING AND ANTI-TNFα
?
62. Solberg IC, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:1430–8
IBSEN: disease course in Crohn’s disease over 10 years
Diseaseactivity
0 1010Years 0 Years
43% 19%
3% 32%
Missing data, 3%
However… Management Must Be Tailored to the
Individual Patient
64. • Disease location and behaviour
– Rectal disease
– Perianal lesions
– Extensive small bowel disease
– Severe upper gastro-intestinal disease
– Severe extraintestinal manifestations
– Deep ulcers
• Worsening factors
– Smoking
– Young age at diagnosis
– Genetic and serological profile (future?)
– Steroids for 1st flare
Clinical features suggesting a « bad » Crohn’s disease
“Optimized step-up or targeted top-down strategies”
Munkholm P. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995;30:699–700; Louis E. Gut 2003;52:552–7; Lakatos P. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:3504–10; Henckaerts L. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
2009;7:972–80; Romberg MJ. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:371–83; Chow D. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009;15:551–7; Hellers G. Gut 1980;21:525–7; Beaugerie L. Gastroenterology
2006;130:650–6; Loly C. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008;43:948–54; Allez M. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:947–53
65. Possible approaches to achieve and long-term
clinical remission in clinical practice?
1. Based on international expert opinion, Abbott IBD Ahead 2010 programme. 2. Colombel JF, et al. Accepted to ECCO 2011: PO69;
3. Colombel JF, et al. Gut 2010;59(Suppl 3):A188: P400 at UEGW 2010; 4. Panaccione R, et al. J Crohn’s Colitis 2009:3;S69: P148 at ECCO
2009; 5. Kamm MA, et al. J Crohn’s Colitis 2009;3:S43-4: P83 at ECCO 2009
• Identify patients likely to have a poor prognosis who may
benefit from intensive therapy
• Optimise conventional therapy quickly1
• Introduce anti-TNF therapy in a timely manner to
appropriate patients2,3
• Sustain efficacy in the longer term
– Sustained clinical and steroid-free remission4,5
• Monitor patients to maintain ‘tight control’
– Will be evaluated in appropriately designed clinical trials
66.
67. CLINICAL PRACTICE
CLINICALCLINICAL
RESEARCHRESEARCH
(Sample Size)(Sample Size)
Different
drug
dosages
Length
of
therapy
Age
limit
Concomitant
therapy
not permitted
in the trials
Concomitant pathologies
Alterated organ function
DIVARICATION BETWEEN CLINICAL RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Referral centres with different experience
68. Comorbidities
Malnutrition,
Disease
severity,
Surgery
Underlying
disease
DIFFERENT RISK OF INFECTIONS IN IBD PATIENTS
Referral centre with different experience
- Increased prevalence ranges from 3-20 fold + ElderlyYoung
Age is a significant risk factor for opportunistic infections
1. Toruner M et al. Gastroenterology 2008;134: 929-936
2. Rahier JF et al. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis 2014; 8,443-68
2 categories of risk :
External to the patientsInherent to the patients
Exposure to
pathogens
Immunomodulator
therapy
Geographic
clustering
Piogenic infections
(Pneumonia, TBC,
urinary tract infections)
Viral infections
Immunomodulator therapy
Viral infections may occur with anti-TNFs, viruses are
more prominent with the thiopurines
69. Risk factors for opportunistic infections in IBD
Toruner M et al. Gastroenterology 2008
Mayo Clinic:
cases had IBD & opportunistic infections (n=100)
controls had IBD only (n=200)
70. Lichtenstein GR et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:212-2
SAFETY OF TREATMENTS
71. Osterman MT et al. Gastroenterology 2014;146:941-9
SAFETY OF TREATMENTS
Risk of malignancies excluding NMSC
Risk of NMSC
72. Cottone M, et al. CGH 2011
Age is Risk Factor for Severe Infections and Mortality
in Patients Given anti-TNF alpha for IBD
95 elderly patients
treated with biologics
190 adult matched
controls treated with
biologics
190 elderly controls not
treated with biologics
UC CD UC CD UC CD
Pts n° 37 58 74 116 74 116
Male/female 20/17 35/23 40/34 70/46 40/34 70/46
Mean age(range) 71 (65-81) 71(65-84) 38(17-64) 39(16-64) 71(65-81) 70(65-80)
Remission n° (%) 22 (59.5) 38 (65.5) 42(56.7) 68 (58.6) - -
Maintenance n° (%) 12 (32.4) 39 (67.2) 24 (32.4) 78 (67.2) - -
Comorbidity n° (%) 35(94.5%) 44 (75.8) 4 (5.4) 6 (5.1) 37 (50) 46(39.6)
Deaths (n°) 4 6 0 2 2 3
Severe infections (n°) 5 6 2 3 1 0
Cancer (n°) 1 1 0 0 1 3
Steroids (n°) 36 54 72 108 74 104
Association
antiTNF+AZA/6MP/MTX n(%)
7 (19) 15 (26) 17 (23) 32 (28) - -
10%
11%13%
11% 2%
1%
2%
73. Efficacy and Safety of Anti-TNF Therapy in Elderly
Patients with IBD
(Univariable Analysis)
The rate of adverse events is higher in elderly pts but especially in those with a higher comorbidity
CCI: Charlson Comorbiity Index
Ortega TL et al. Mo 1179; DDW 2014
In the multivariable analysis age remained an independent risk factor for
severe infection [4,2; (1.2-14-4), p= 0.025] and SAE [2; (1.1-3.7), p= 0.029]
Age > 65 and CCI > 0 were risk factors for malignancy and mortality
74. Osterman MT et al. Gastroenterology 2014;146:941-9
SAFETY OF TREATMENTS
Risk of malignancies excluding NMSC
Risk of NMSC
75. Risk of wrong prescriptions and the over
treatment of biologics
76. CASE REPORT
A 56-year old man presented tfor severe anemia (hemoglobin 6.7 g/dl) in absence of any sign of
gastrointestinal bleeding but positive fecal occult blood test.
He had not any previous diagnosis of CD and he was admitted to hospital.
GI endoscopy that was normal. Ileocolonoscopy showed blood in the terminal ileum and only some small
ulcers in the terminal ileum.
Subsequently patient underwent to another ileo-colonoscopy that confirmed previous result.
The histopathological examination of the ileal biopsies was compatible to CD diagnosis, confirmed by two
pathologists.
An MRI enterography was performed and showed increased bowel wall thickness in some ileal loops,
narrowed lumen and dilatation confirmed by 2 abdominal CT, MRI and CT showed also multiple increased
mesenteric lymph nodes (2-2.5 cm).
Crohn’s disease was diagnosed on the basis of MRI enterography and patients began treatment with
prednisone 1 mg/kg with no benefit.
After 1 month, patient with severe abdominal pain, vomit, fever, persistence of severe anemia and melena.
A double-ballon enteroscopy was performed but it was incomplete due to trouble in to pass terminal ileum.
Given previous findings compatible with Crohn’s disease diagnosis but no response to corticosteroids
treatment and the persistence of severe anemia refractory to iron therapy patient underwent surgery.
82. Natural course of disease
A theoretical model: early, sustainable efficacy may
have the greatest impact on clinical course
Adapted from Jones J, Panaccione R. Curr Opinion Gastroenterol 2008;24:475–81
Time
Disability
Disease onset
2015-16.. onwards
Treatment
at diagnosis
1998–2007
Later
treatment
Intervention at diagnosis
Later intervention
S U S T A I N A B L E
2008-2014
Earlier
treatment
83. Conclusions
• Anti-TNFs are active long term maintenance therapies in IBD
• Effective interventions with biologics should be initiated before bowel
damage becomes irreversible
• Clinical parameters can be used to predict an unfavourable disease course
and thus promply identify which patients are at higher risk of disease
progression
• Combo therapy seems to be effective than either drug alone in patients with
early disease, but new studies are needed
• Patients with disease duration ≤ 2 years are most likely to benefit from TNF
antagonists
• Presence of biological normalization suggestive of absence of infraclinical
inflammation seems to be associated with a greater clinical benefit
• Optimize dosing of drugs and give therapy long enough but if not
efficacious discontinue
84. Know your patient
Examine your patient
Screen your patient
Teach your patient
Treat and monitor
your patient
Does your patient need biologics?
Detailed interview:
Ideally the medical
history should cover
• Infections (bacterial and fungal)
• TB/opportunistic infections
• History of VZV and HSV
infections
• Immunisation status for HBV
• Vaccination status
• History of travel in tropical area
(future plans to travel in this
area)
Editor's Notes
Dr Remo Panaccione presented this theoretical model during an Abbott symposium at the ECCO 2010 meeting.
The goals of Crohn’s disease management – together with the corresponding clinical parameters and outcomes – have evolved.
Dr Panaccione suggested that we may be able to sustain these outcomes, and proposed sustained deep remission as potential new treatment goal.
3. How will SDR as a management goal affect patients with early or late disease?
Because the expression of CD changes over time, disease duration may alter treatment goals.
Patients with late disease may have symptoms arising from both inflammatory and non-inflammatory causes (e.g. strictures, bile salt wasting after ileal resection).
The definition of SDR may be different for different patient types (e.g. absence of symptoms in patients with early CD, and improvement in symptoms in those with late CD).
The evidence from EXTEND suggests that deep remission is associated with improved longer-term outcomes. Let us now turn our attention to further long-term benefits that may be achieved with extended treatment.
As we know, Crohn’s disease is a progressive disease that leads to cumulative damage and disability.
These familiar Kaplan-Meier curves are based on a retrospective analysis of data from 2,002 Crohn’s disease patients.
The curves estimate the probabilities of remaining free of penetrating complications (upper curve) and of penetrating and/or stricturing complications (lower curve). This analysis revealed that only 48% and 12% of patients would be free of these complications 5 and 20 years after diagnosis, respectively.
RRP: rapid radiographic progression
Analogamente la maggiore efficacia nella malattia più precoce (identificata dai sottogruppi con più breve durata di malattia dalla diagnosi) è stata dimostrata, da un’analisi post-hoc dello studio CHARM, anche per adalimumab.
I pazienti randomizzati nel CHARM con durata di malattia inferiore a 2 anni presentavano maggiore beneficio dal trattamento rispetto a quelli con maggiore durata di malattia.
La riduzione relativa del rischio è del 67% nel primo gruppo, del 75% nel secondo e del 69% nel terzo, ma il beneficio assoluto è superiore nei pazienti con durata di malattia &lt;2 anni, superando un tasso di remissione del 50% all’anno di trattamento.
La strategia ‘Top-down’, che ha avuto una prova concettuale di efficacia nello studio Step-up/Top-down, si è dimostrata più efficace della ‘Step-up’ nell’indurre e mantenere una remissione libera da steroidi ad uno e due anni dopo l’arruolamento. In questo studio il trattamento più aggressivo era rappresentato da induzione con infliximab + azatioprina, e confrontata con un approccio di accelerated step-up con cicli steroidei orali, a seguire immunosoppressori e da ultimo infliximab.
Va segnalato che i pazienti avevano una durata media di malattia piuttosto bassa e non erano mai stati sottoposti a terapia steroidea in precedenza.
Vi sono poi le osservazioni relative allo studio di follow-up del Step-up Top-down trial.
La premessa è che il 73% dei pazienti sottoposti alla strategia Top-down e solo il 30% di coloro che avevano seguito la strategia Step-up avevano raggiunto la guarigione mucosale al termine del secondo anno di trattamento (quindi l’OR per la guarigione mucosale era di oltre 6 volte a favore della strategia Top-down), pur avendo simili probabilità di essere in uno stato di remissione clinica.
Tuttavia seguendo i pazienti per ulteriori 2 anni (ed avendo ridotto la popolazione ai 49 soggetti con valutazione endoscopica all’anno 2 di terapia), coloro che avevano raggiunto la guarigione mucosale, con qualsiasi regime e farmaco, presentavano rispetto a coloro che non avevano ottenuto la guarigione mucosale una probabilità circa 6.5 volte maggiore di conservare una remissione clinica senza steroidi, 7.5 volte maggiore di conservare una remissione clinica senza sia gli steroidi, sia IFX e un rischio ridotto di quasi 7 volte di sviluppare nuove fistole nei 2 anni successivi
Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology and Co-Director of the University of Oxford&apos;s Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU)
Patients received open-label induction therapy with adalimumab 80 mg (week 0) followed by 40 mg (week 2). At week 4, patients were stratified by response (decrease in Crohn’s Disease Activity Index &gt;70 points from baseline) and randomized to double-blind treatment with placebo, adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), or adalimumab 40 mg weekly through week 56. Coprimary end points were the percentages of randomized responders who achieved clinical remission (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score &lt;150) at weeks 26 and 56. Results: The percentage of randomized responders in remission was significantly greater in the adalimumab 40-mg eow and 40-mg weekly groups versus placebo at week 26 (40%, 47%, and 17%, respectively; P &lt; .001) and week 56 (36%, 41%, and 12%,
respectively; P &lt; .001). No significant differences in efficacy between adalimumab eow and weekly were observed. More patients receiving placebo discontinued
treatment because of an adverse event (13.4%) than those receiving adalimumab (6.9% and 4.7% in the 40-mg eow and 40-mg weekly groups, respectively).
Un importante obiettivo della terapia nelle malattie infiammatorie intestinali è quello di raggiungere una remissione libera da steroide.
Il mantenimento della remissione libera da steroide nello studio ADHERE è stato calcolato:
1 (colonna verde) : su tutti i pazienti che prendevano steroidi al baseline dello studio CHARM (53 pts)
2 (colonna arancione): su tutti i pazienti randomised responders dello studio CHARM indipendentemente dall’uso iniziale di corticosteroidi (147 pts)
Il secondo grafico mostra la percentuale di pazienti che raggiungeva una remissione libera da steroide alla fine del CHARM e che la manteneva alla settimana 212 (4 anni). In altre parole più della metà dei pazienti che utilizzavano steroidi all’inizio dello studio e che raggiungevano una remissione libera da steroide alla settimana 56 la mantenevano alla settimana 212.
At the end of the follow up (mean 38.6 ± 8.6 months) 54 pts (49%) were still in maintaining treatment with ADA with significant clinical benefit, 56 pts stopped treatment because of ineffectiveness (35), side effects (15) or mucosal healing (6). Among no responders 16 pts were then treated with infliximab and 11 of them had a clinical response. During the follow up 26 pts received a new induction dosage with 160/80 mg of ADA because of lack of efficacy and 13 of them (50%) had a clinical response. Twenty-eight pts received a weekly mainteining treatment at the dosage of 40 mg and 14 of them (50%) had a clinical response. Mucosal healing were reported in 15 of 60 pts who underwent colonoscopy (25%) after a mean follow up of 24 ± 0,9 months. At the end of the follow up 19 pts were operated on.
At univariable analysis a lower induction regimen (80/40 mg) were associated with a best response to infliximab. (P &lt; 0.001, OR 6, 95% CI, 1.01–35.91) while 160/80 mg induction regimen with a lower risk of surgery respect to 80/40 mg (p=0.04, OR 0.311 95% CI 0.969 -0.998). ADA was well tolerated. At the end of follow-up 15 pts (13.6%) developed side effects that determined discontinuation of the treatment.
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a marker used to identify and follow individuals with CD. We analyzed changes in levels of CRP in a large cohort
of patients with CD undergoing treatment with infliximab.
METHODS: Serial levels of CRP were analyzed in 718 CD patients. Blood was collected before each infusion; a total of 8845 CRP levels were available for analysis. The correlations between CRP levels and need for dose adjustment, outcomes, and mucosal healing (based on endoscopic analysis of 253 patients) were evaluated. Therapy adjustment was considered successful if therapy continued without need for change. Subgroup analysis was performed by using data from 268 patients
who received 8 weeks of maintenance therapy. RESULTS: More patients with high baseline levels of CRP responded to infliximab than patients with normal levels (90.8% vs 82.6%; P.014). Early normalization of CRP levels correlated with sustained long-term response (P .001). CRP levels remained significantly higher among patients who lost their response to infliximab, compared with those with a sustained response (P .001). At time of loss of response, CRP levels were significantly increased (median, 11.2 mg/L) and did not return to baseline levels (median, 18.2 mg/L; P .039). CRP correlated with mucosal healing (P .033). CONCLUSIONS: CRP is a good marker of disease activity in patients treated with infliximab. Increased levels of CRP indicate mucosal inflammation and a likelihood of clinical relapse.
Il raggiungimento della guarigione mucosa risulta poi ancora più probabile se l’azatioprina e il biologico vengono utilizzati in combinazione, come vediamo nel famoso studio SONIC, in cui dopo 26 settimane di terapia un gruppo di pazienti trattati con aza + infl raggiungeva in percentuale maggiore la guarigione mucosa rispetto al gruppo di pazienti trattati con sola aza o solo inflix.
In ogni caso va ricordato che la malattia di Crohn può avere un decorso quanto mai variabile e lo studio epidemiologico di popolazione norvegese dell’IBSEN ha registrato che valutando i pannelli in senso orario:
poco meno di metà dei pazienti ha un decorso progressivamente meno invalidante, con relapse sempre meno frequenti e gravi rispetto al primo episodio
circa 1/5 dei casi ha un decorso cronicamente attivo
in 1/3 dei casi circa ha episodi nel tempo di eguale gravità rispetto al primo, intervallati da periodi di remissione
in casi relativamente eccezionali, a un decorso iniziale assai mite segue una progressione verso un’attività di malattia grave e persistente.
Di conseguenza ogni trattamento deve essere individualizzatro tenendo conto delle caratteristiche di ciascun paziente.
La selezione del paziente e del trattamento, d’altro canto, è flessibile e deve sempre prendere in considerazione la storia ed il peso complessivo della malattia, alla luce di una prospettiva che includa considerazioni del rapporto rischi/benefici, preferenza e attese del paziente, ed il rapporto di questi elementi con la gravità e la complessità della malattia stessa.
Firstly, we need to identify patients with a poor prognosis who may benefit from timely, intensive treatment.
Questo aumentato rischio di infezioni ha origine multifattoriale.
Già la malattia infiammatoria intestinale di base gioca un ruolo, in virtù dei difetti dell’immunità mucosale descritti nella sua patogenesi (comprendenti per esempio il deficit di defensine, il deficit di chemiotassi neutrofila, le ridotte capacità battericide e fungicide, oltre ai difetti della barriera intestinale). Non sembra invece esserci a priori un difetto dell’immunità sistemica, anche se questa risulta poi deficitaria in virtù della malnutrizione (frequente nelle fasi di attività), di danni chirurgici, e soprattutto di terapie immunosoppressive, specie se combinate. Senza scordare inoltre atti particolari a rischio, come le emotrasfusioni, e fattori di rischio generici quali l’età, le comorbidità e le esposizioni (es. viaggi in aree endemiche, non osservanza di comuni regole igieniche, contatto con malati, ecc). Tra questi ultimi degno di nota è il fattore età, seppur controverso, dato che vari studi non ne hanno dimostrato un ruolo indipendente, anche se l’età avanzata è stata associata ad un aumentato rischio di infezioni batteriche piogene, riattivazione di TBC e herpes zoster. Massima cautela, quindi. Idem per le comorbidità, anche se nelle casistiche IBD non ne sono state evidenziate specificamente; nelle casistiche reumatologiche invece ne sono state individuate 4: pneumopatie, alcolismo, vasculopatie cerebrali e diabete mellito.
Va notato come non esistano peraltro metodi per quantificare il grado di immunosoppressione “funzionale” di un paziente, e pertanto non è possibile quantificarne il reale rischio infettivo.
11% severe infectios
10% death
3% cancer
Dr Remo Panaccione and his group published a theoretical paper in 2008 on the effects of treatment, and postulated that early intervention may have a great impact on both the pathologic and clinical disease courses.
Looking at the natural course of disease (in red), substantial disability will occur over time if Crohn’s disease remains untreated.
From 1998-2007, effective treatment was started, but relatively late in the disease course, and therefore still leading to substantial disability.
With earlier treatment (from 2008 onwards), it may be possible to reduce disability. And no further increase in the maximum level of disability reached can be obtained by continuous treatment with effective therapies.
Now and in the future, we are looking at even more intensive treatment, starting at diagnosis, with different treatment goals.
Quindi in definitiva i farmaci biologici sono tutto sommato abbastanza sicuri se si fa attenzione ad alcuni aspetti:
Non iniziare il trattamento in presenza di una infezione
Effettuare gli adeguati screening prima di iniziare
Utilizzare la premedicazione e lo schema di trattamento schedulato al fine di ridurre il rischio di reazioni infusionali per quanto riguarda l’infliximab
Tenere in considerazione il fatto che l’utilizzo concomitante di farmaci biologici ed altri immunosoppressori potrebbe aumentare il rischio di linfoma epatosplenico, particolarmente nei soggetti giovani
Evitare l’utilizzo di farmaci biologici in pazienti in classe NYHA 3 e 4 e in caso di malattie demielinizzanti
E comunque per meglio comprendere e quindi gestire il profilo di sicurezza dei farmaci biologici abbiamo bisogno di follow up più lunghi per cui sarà necessario aspettare ancora qualche anno.
Biologics should not be started during infections
Screening for latent infections is mandatory
Caution in the elderly patients
Vaccination against vaccine preventable diseases
Anti-TNFα may cause paradoxical inflammation in other organs
Anti-TNFα may increase the risk of lymphoma: caution with combo therapy in young patients
Regular follow-up during biological therapy with blood tests and physical examination also helps to optimize safety
Risks can be reduced further by promoting heightened awareness by both patients and physicians of the adverse effects associated with biologic therapy