Getting Engaged: funding and communication of CSO projects in the association process cisep chernihiv

1. Getting Engaged:
funding and communication of
CSO projects in the association
process
Chernihiv, 18-21 January 2016

2. Welcome Back! 

3. 3
• Workshop Program
• Warm-up
• Recap Homework
• Coffee Break
• Introduction to PCM
Today‘s Agenda
CiSEP WS 3: Getting Engaged

4. 4
AGENDA
CiSEP WS 3: Getting Engaged
•Intro to Workshop
•Recap WS 2
•Intro to Project
Cycle Management
DAY 1
Monday, 18 Jan 2016
•Communication for
CSOs in the
Association process
Ms Marina RAKIC
DAY 2
Tuesday, 19 Jan 2016 •Fundraising and EU
Funding
Programmes
Mr Dragan POPOVIC
DAY 3
Wednesday, 20 Jan
2016
•Wrap up: Brochure
•Overall evaluation
•Closing Ceremony
DAY 4
Thursday, 21 Jan 2016
Workshop Objective: After the workshop you are able to define the Project Cycle
Management. You know how to apply communication tools regarding the EU
association. You can identify possible fundraising sources and you know the main EU
funding programmes relevant for CSO in Ukraine.

5. 5
Questions? Requests?
CiSEP WS 3: Getting Engaged

6. 6
• Search the room for
people who fit to one
criteria and sign the
sheet! The first one
completed is the
WINNER…
• ATTENTION: you can
sign the sheet only
once.
Warm-up: Autograph Bingo
CiSEP WS 3: Getting Engaged

7. Homework Wrap-up

8. 8
Task Description
• Reading Analysis:
What does the Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 imply concerning rights
and duties of drivers? Where do you see intersections with DCFTA
Chapter 13?
• Stakeholder analysis:
Who is concerned by the Regulation? Please conduct a stakeholder
analysis!
• Problem tree:
Design a problem tree, defining causes and effects of the problem
described!
DCFTA Chapter 13
European Labour and Social Standards
Homework Wrap-up

9. 9
Social conditions
• Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the
harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to
road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC)
No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council
Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85
• Timetable: the Regulation's provisions shall be
implemented in national transport within 5 years of the
entry into force of this Agreement.
AA page 1962/2135
Annex XXXII to Title V Chapter 7 Transport
Homework Wrap-up

10. 10
• A problem tree
provides an overview
to all the known
causes (roots) and
effects (branches) to
an identified problem.
Problem Tree
Homework Wrap-up
MAIN PROBLEM
Cause Cause Cause
Cause Cause
Consequence Consequence
Consequence Consequence

11. 11
Shift plans are not
„drivers-friendly“
Authorities do not /
cannot enforce the law
Driving and rest hours are not
respected
Tachometres are
manipulated
Transport
undertakings don‘t
compete fairly
Ukrainian law is not
harmonzied with Regulation
(EC) No 561/2006
Drivers are tired
Competition is not
fair
Fair players can‘t
prevail on the
market
Drivers are
discontent and sick Accidents
People are hurt and
die
Poor quality of
services
High (social) costs
Transport
undertakings are not
aware of the risks
Homework Wrap-up

12. 12
• An objective tree
inverts the problem
tree. Causes-
Consequences
become Means-Goal
Relationships.
Objective Tree
Homework Wrap-up
12
Goal
Means Means Means
Means Means
Goal Goal
Goal Goal

13. 13
Shift plans are
„drivers-friendly“
Authorities enforce the
law
Driving and rest hours are
respected
Tachometres are
not manipulated
Transport
undertakings
compete fairly
Ukrainian law is harmonzied
with Regulation (EC) No
561/2006
Drivers are not tired
Competition is not
fair
Fair players prevail
on the market
Drivers are content
and healthy Low rate of
accidents
Low rate of injured
people
High quality of
services
Lower (social) costs
Transport
undertakings are
aware of the risks
Homework Wrap-up

14. 14
Дякую за увагу!