SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 31
JOB EVALUATION
PRESENTED BY,
LEEL ASWATHY ASOK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ybhoe2A8uZE
Job Evaluation
 It is a systematic process of determining the worth of one job in relation to
another job in the organization.
 Job evaluation is a method for comparing different jobs to provide a basis for
grading and pay structure.
 The relative worth of various jobs are assessed so that wages can be paid
depending upon the worth of the job.
 Without job evaluations, the HR department would be unable to develop a
rational approach to pay. All job evaluation systems depend heavily on job
analysis.
Features of Job Evaluation
 It tries to assess jobs, not people.
 The basic information on which job evaluations are made is obtained from the job
analysis.
 Job evaluations are carried out by groups, not by individuals.
 Some degree of subjectivity is always present in job evaluation.
 Job evaluation does not fix pay scales but merely provides a basis for evaluating a
rational wage structure.
OBJECTIVES OF JOB EVALUATION
 It helps in devising an acceptable wage.
 It helps in the proper placement of workers in job.
 It helps the personnel department to recruit the right person for a job since
requirement of each job are clearly indicated.
 It helps in formulating the internal training plan.
 It helps to avoid wage and other discrimination for similar jobs in same
organization or a group of organizations under the same management.
JOB EVALUATION
VS
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
It means to find the relative worthiness of a job Finding the worth of a jobholder
Job evaluation analysis the job and do not take
into account the individual abilities of the job
holder
Performance appraisal is concerned with
comparative merit of individuals
Aims is to determine the wage rates of different
jobs
Determining incentives and rewards for superior
performance
Shows how much a job is worth. Shows how well an individual is doing an assigned
work
Process of Job Evaluation Program
• Gaining acceptance.
• Creating a job evaluation committee.
• Finding the jobs to be evaluated.
• Analyzing and preparing a job description.
• Selecting the method of evaluation.
• Classifying jobs.
Gaining Acceptance
 Before undertaking job evaluation, top management must explain the aims and
uses of the program to the employees and unions.
 To elaborate the program further, oral presentation could be made. Letters,
booklets could be used to classify all relevant aspects of the job evaluation
program.
Creating Job Evaluation Committee
 It is not possible for a single person to evaluate all the key jobs in an organization.
Usually, a job evaluation committee consisting of experienced employees, union
representatives and HR experts is created to set the ball rolling
Finding the Jobs to be Evaluated
 Every job need not be evaluated. This may be too taxing and costly. Certain key
jobs in each department may be identified. While picking up the jobs, care must
be taken to ensure that they represent the type of work performed in the
department.
Analyzing and Preparing Job Description
 This requires the preparation of a job description and also an analysis of job needs
for successful performance.
Selecting the Method of Evaluation
 The most important method of evaluating the jobs must be identified now,
keeping the job factors as well as organizational demands in mind.
Classifying Jobs
 The relative worth of various jobs in an organization may be found out after
arranging jobs in order of importance using criteria such as skill requirements,
experience needed, under which conditions job is performed, type of
responsibilities to be shouldered, degree of supervision needed, the amount of
stress caused by the job etc.
 Weights can be assigned to each such factor. When we finally add all the weights,
the worth of a job is determined. The points may then be converted into monetary
values.
Reviewing Periodically
 In the light of changes in environmental conditions (technology, products,
services, etc.), jobs need to be examined closely. For example, the traditional
clerical functions have undergone a rapid change in sectors like banking,
insurance and railways, after computerisation.
 New job descriptions need to be written and the skill needs of new jobs need to
be duly incorporated in the evaluation process. Otherwise, employees may feel
that all the relevant job factors—based on which their pay has been determined—
have not been evaluated properly
Types of Job Evaluation
Quantitative Methods
 Factor Comparison Method: under this method the relative worth of a particular
job will be assessed on the basis of 5 factors
1. Working conditions
2. Physical requirements
3. mental requirements
4. Skill requirements
5. Responsibilities
 Point Method: Under this method some core elements or factors will be
identified. They are
 Skills
 Efforts ,
 Responsibilities
 Working condition.
 Weightage will be given to those factors separately.
 Advantages of Points System:
 (a) It is more systematic and objective than other systems.
 (b) It provides numerical basis for job classification and wage differentials.
 (c) Bias/favoritism minimized.
 (d) A large number of jobs can be evaluated and the jobs can be placed in distinct categories.
 (e) Once the factors, sub factors and points are developed, they can be used for a long time.
 (f) Acceptance is better than other systems.
 Limitations:
 (a) It is time-consuming and expensive process.
 (b) Employees find it difficult to understand the working of this method.
Non-Quantitative
 Comparison/Ranking Methods:
 As per this method, jobs are arranged from highest to lowest, in order of their values or
merit to the organization.
 Jobs can also be arranged according to the relative difficulty in performing them.
 The job at the top has the highest value and job at the lowest has the lowest value.
 Jobs are arranged in each department and then department ranking are combined to
develop an organization ranking.
 Advantages of Ranking System:
 The system is simple, easy to understand and easy to explain to the employees.
 It require less time, less work and is less expensive.
 Disadvantages:
 There is no defined criteria for rating the jobs and the rating is based on
judgement of the raters.
 The rating may be influenced by bias/favouritism.
 The systems only ranks the jobs and does not indicate the exact differences
between one job and the other.
 Job Classification or Grading Method:
 Under this method, yardstick is provided in the form of job classes or grades.
 The committee goes through the job description of each job and assigns it a particular
grade.
 There are different rates of wages for different grades of jobs. The jobs may be graded
as skilled, unskilled, routine, administrative, etc.
Decision Band Method (DBM)
 The Decision Band method (DBM) of job evaluation bases itself on the premise that the value of a
job to an organization depends on the level of responsibility, which is in turn manifests as the extent
of decision making involved in the job.
 It assumes that since all jobs require incumbents to make decisions, decision-making is a logical
and equitable basis to compare jobs.
 The methodology involves a three step process of allocating jobs into bands, grading jobs within a
band into two, and then assigning sub grades to each grade, all based on the nature of extend of
decisions taken as part of the job.
1. Banding
2. Grading
3. Sub- Grading
Banding
 DBM initially classifies all jobs or positions in an enterprise into six broad bands, based on the level
of responsibility the job holds within the organization.
Grading
 The second step in Decision Band Job Evaluation is classifying jobs within bands according to the
difficulty and effort involved in the supervisory responsibilities of such jobs.
 Coordinating jobs where the incumbent supervise or monitor the work of another employee in the
same band enjoy a higher grade within the band, compared to jobs that do not supervise or monitor
the work of others in the same band.
 For example, an extremely skilled IT programmer in Band B may concentrate on developing codes,
without any supervisory roles. Another employee in band B, even though not as competent as the
skilled programmer when it comes to coding skills may nevertheless have a higher grade because
of being the team leader who supervise other employees
 As a rule of thumb, each lower grade has three sub grades and each upper or higher responsibility
grade has two sub grades. There is however, no set or fixed number of sub-grades, and
organizational requirements decide the optimal number.
Sub-Grading
 Sub-grading involves assessing the relative difficulty, complexity, and skills required of the
job in comparison to the other jobs within the same Band and Grade.
 The factors used to measure such concepts include
 Extent of knowledge required to complete tasks
 Hard skills required for completing job tasks
 Soft skills such as communication skills and customer service skills required for
completing job tasks
 The extent of time pressure the job involves
 Mental effort required such as alertness and concentration
 Extent of physical activity required for the job
 Need for care and precision in the job
 Working conditions
Advantages of Job Evaluation
• Reduction in inequalities in salary structure - It is found that people and their motivation is dependent
upon how well they are being paid. Therefore the main objective of job evaluation is to have external and
internal consistency in salary structure so that inequalities in salaries are reduced.
• Specialization - Because of division of labour and thereby specialization, a large number of enterprises have
got hundred jobs and many employees to perform them. Therefore, an attempt should be made to define a job
and thereby fix salaries for it. This is possible only through job evaluation.
• Helps in selection of employees - The job evaluation information can be helpful at the time of selection of
candidates. The factors that are determined for job evaluation can be taken into account while selecting the
employees.
• Harmonious relationship between employees and manager - Through job evaluation, harmonious and
congenial relations can be maintained between employees and management, so that all kinds of salaries
controversies can be minimized.
• Standardization - The process of determining the salary differentials for different jobs become standardized
through job evaluation. This helps in bringing uniformity into salary structure.
• Relevance of new jobs - Through job evaluation, one can understand the relative value of new jobs in a
concern.
Limitations of Job Evaluation
 Job evaluation is not without limitations. The main limitations are as follows:
1. Job evaluation is not exactly scientific. It lacks scientific precision because all factors
cannot be measured accurately.
2. Most of the techniques are difficult to understand, even for the supervisors.
3. The factors taken by the program are not exhaustive.
4. There may be wide fluctuations in compensable factors given changes in technology,
values, and aspirations of employers, etc.
5. Employees, trade union leaders, management, and the program operators may assign
different weights to different factors, thus creating grounds for dispute.
6. The trade unions regard job evaluation with suspicion because it is made on certain
principles, and the results are generally ignored. Some of the methods of job
evaluation are not easily understood by workers. Workers fear that job evaluation will
do away with collective bargaining.
7. A job evaluation scheme takes a long time to install. It requires specialized personnel,
and it is costly.
Conclusion
 To summarize, Job evaluation is associated with a process of establishing worth of
different jobs. Job evaluation offers a basis for ranking or grading different jobs and
developing a pay structure for them. It is the process of explaining the duties, authority
relationships, skills, condition of work and other relevant information related to jobs. It
provides valuable data and information to develop job description and specification
documents. Job evaluation is a significant task of human resource manager which is done
in order to determine the value or worth of each job within the organization.

More Related Content

What's hot

Organizational Development Interventions
Organizational Development InterventionsOrganizational Development Interventions
Organizational Development Interventions
Ramakrishna Kongalla
 
Pay-for-Performance Plan
Pay-for-Performance Plan Pay-for-Performance Plan
Pay-for-Performance Plan
aizellbernal
 
Effect of Team Work in employees performance (The Empirical Assessment of ban...
Effect of Team Work in employees performance (The Empirical Assessment of ban...Effect of Team Work in employees performance (The Empirical Assessment of ban...
Effect of Team Work in employees performance (The Empirical Assessment of ban...
Mohammad Qasim Bin Ayaz
 
Merit Pay - Karim Virani
Merit Pay - Karim ViraniMerit Pay - Karim Virani
Merit Pay - Karim Virani
Karim Virani
 

What's hot (20)

Job evolution ppt
Job evolution pptJob evolution ppt
Job evolution ppt
 
Organizational Development Interventions
Organizational Development InterventionsOrganizational Development Interventions
Organizational Development Interventions
 
organization development
organization developmentorganization development
organization development
 
Pay-for-Performance Plan
Pay-for-Performance Plan Pay-for-Performance Plan
Pay-for-Performance Plan
 
Point method in job evaluation ppt
Point method in job evaluation pptPoint method in job evaluation ppt
Point method in job evaluation ppt
 
Effect of Team Work in employees performance (The Empirical Assessment of ban...
Effect of Team Work in employees performance (The Empirical Assessment of ban...Effect of Team Work in employees performance (The Empirical Assessment of ban...
Effect of Team Work in employees performance (The Empirical Assessment of ban...
 
Job evaluation methods
Job evaluation methodsJob evaluation methods
Job evaluation methods
 
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and ToolsJob Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
 
incentives and performance based pay
incentives and performance based payincentives and performance based pay
incentives and performance based pay
 
Job design report white
Job design report whiteJob design report white
Job design report white
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Compensation Strategy
Compensation StrategyCompensation Strategy
Compensation Strategy
 
Job design
Job designJob design
Job design
 
Employee compensation and practices
Employee compensation and practicesEmployee compensation and practices
Employee compensation and practices
 
Pay structure: Grades & Ranges
Pay structure: Grades & RangesPay structure: Grades & Ranges
Pay structure: Grades & Ranges
 
Merit Pay - Karim Virani
Merit Pay - Karim ViraniMerit Pay - Karim Virani
Merit Pay - Karim Virani
 
Job evaluation - Human Resource Management
Job evaluation - Human Resource ManagementJob evaluation - Human Resource Management
Job evaluation - Human Resource Management
 
Compensation Administration & Wage Policy
Compensation Administration & Wage PolicyCompensation Administration & Wage Policy
Compensation Administration & Wage Policy
 
All you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading system
All you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading systemAll you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading system
All you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading system
 
potential appraisal
potential appraisalpotential appraisal
potential appraisal
 

Similar to Job Evaluation.pptx

hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdfhrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
ssuser112f91
 
Compensation and benefits
Compensation and benefitsCompensation and benefits
Compensation and benefits
Laiqa Ahmed
 
Job evaluation l 11
Job evaluation  l 11Job evaluation  l 11
Job evaluation l 11
prannoy2392
 
Compensation and benefits
Compensation and benefitsCompensation and benefits
Compensation and benefits
Laiqa Ahmed
 

Similar to Job Evaluation.pptx (20)

Job Evaluation_Parakramesh Jaroli_MBA_HR
Job Evaluation_Parakramesh Jaroli_MBA_HRJob Evaluation_Parakramesh Jaroli_MBA_HR
Job Evaluation_Parakramesh Jaroli_MBA_HR
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatagesJob evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
 
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdfhrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
 
Job evaluation and wage plan
Job evaluation and wage planJob evaluation and wage plan
Job evaluation and wage plan
 
Compensation
CompensationCompensation
Compensation
 
Job evaluation ppt
Job evaluation pptJob evaluation ppt
Job evaluation ppt
 
HRM-Job Evaluation.ppt
HRM-Job Evaluation.pptHRM-Job Evaluation.ppt
HRM-Job Evaluation.ppt
 
Module2- Job Evaluation.pptx
Module2- Job Evaluation.pptxModule2- Job Evaluation.pptx
Module2- Job Evaluation.pptx
 
Compensation and benefits
Compensation and benefitsCompensation and benefits
Compensation and benefits
 
Job evaluation l 11
Job evaluation  l 11Job evaluation  l 11
Job evaluation l 11
 
Compensation and benefits
Compensation and benefitsCompensation and benefits
Compensation and benefits
 
job_evaluation HUMAN RESIRCE MANAGEMENT. ppt
job_evaluation HUMAN RESIRCE MANAGEMENT. pptjob_evaluation HUMAN RESIRCE MANAGEMENT. ppt
job_evaluation HUMAN RESIRCE MANAGEMENT. ppt
 
KMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluation
KMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluationKMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluation
KMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluation
 
Job evaluation - Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation -  Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin JoyJob evaluation -  Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation - Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin Joy
 
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation -  compensation management - Manu Melwin JoyJob evaluation -  compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
JOB EVALUATION.pptx
JOB EVALUATION.pptxJOB EVALUATION.pptx
JOB EVALUATION.pptx
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Hrm job evaluation
Hrm job evaluationHrm job evaluation
Hrm job evaluation
 

Recently uploaded

Mount abu Escort💋 Kajal Rate 4500/- Cash Payment 24/7
Mount abu Escort💋 Kajal Rate 4500/- Cash Payment 24/7Mount abu Escort💋 Kajal Rate 4500/- Cash Payment 24/7
Mount abu Escort💋 Kajal Rate 4500/- Cash Payment 24/7
ickkoo5
 
internship thesis pakistan aeronautical complex kamra
internship thesis pakistan aeronautical complex kamrainternship thesis pakistan aeronautical complex kamra
internship thesis pakistan aeronautical complex kamra
AllTops
 
The Psychology Of Motivation - Richard Brown
The Psychology Of Motivation - Richard BrownThe Psychology Of Motivation - Richard Brown
The Psychology Of Motivation - Richard Brown
SandaliGurusinghe2
 

Recently uploaded (15)

Internal Reconstruction Corporate accounting by bhumika Garg
Internal Reconstruction Corporate accounting by bhumika GargInternal Reconstruction Corporate accounting by bhumika Garg
Internal Reconstruction Corporate accounting by bhumika Garg
 
Persuasive and Communication is the art of negotiation.
Persuasive and Communication is the art of negotiation.Persuasive and Communication is the art of negotiation.
Persuasive and Communication is the art of negotiation.
 
Information Technology Project Management, Revised 7th edition test bank.docx
Information Technology Project Management, Revised 7th edition test bank.docxInformation Technology Project Management, Revised 7th edition test bank.docx
Information Technology Project Management, Revised 7th edition test bank.docx
 
W.H.Bender Quote 62 - Always strive to be a Hospitality Service professional
W.H.Bender Quote 62 - Always strive to be a Hospitality Service professionalW.H.Bender Quote 62 - Always strive to be a Hospitality Service professional
W.H.Bender Quote 62 - Always strive to be a Hospitality Service professional
 
Group work -meaning and definitions- Characteristics and Importance
Group work -meaning and definitions- Characteristics and ImportanceGroup work -meaning and definitions- Characteristics and Importance
Group work -meaning and definitions- Characteristics and Importance
 
thesis-and-viva-voce preparation for research scholars
thesis-and-viva-voce preparation for research scholarsthesis-and-viva-voce preparation for research scholars
thesis-and-viva-voce preparation for research scholars
 
Spring-2024-Priesthoods of Augustus Yale Historical Review
Spring-2024-Priesthoods of Augustus Yale Historical ReviewSpring-2024-Priesthoods of Augustus Yale Historical Review
Spring-2024-Priesthoods of Augustus Yale Historical Review
 
Mount abu Escort💋 Kajal Rate 4500/- Cash Payment 24/7
Mount abu Escort💋 Kajal Rate 4500/- Cash Payment 24/7Mount abu Escort💋 Kajal Rate 4500/- Cash Payment 24/7
Mount abu Escort💋 Kajal Rate 4500/- Cash Payment 24/7
 
internship thesis pakistan aeronautical complex kamra
internship thesis pakistan aeronautical complex kamrainternship thesis pakistan aeronautical complex kamra
internship thesis pakistan aeronautical complex kamra
 
How Software Developers Destroy Business Value.pptx
How Software Developers Destroy Business Value.pptxHow Software Developers Destroy Business Value.pptx
How Software Developers Destroy Business Value.pptx
 
The Psychology Of Motivation - Richard Brown
The Psychology Of Motivation - Richard BrownThe Psychology Of Motivation - Richard Brown
The Psychology Of Motivation - Richard Brown
 
Marketing Management 16th edition by Philip Kotler test bank.docx
Marketing Management 16th edition by Philip Kotler test bank.docxMarketing Management 16th edition by Philip Kotler test bank.docx
Marketing Management 16th edition by Philip Kotler test bank.docx
 
digital Human resource management presentation.pdf
digital Human resource management presentation.pdfdigital Human resource management presentation.pdf
digital Human resource management presentation.pdf
 
Siliguri Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime Siliguri
Siliguri Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime SiliguriSiliguri Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime Siliguri
Siliguri Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime Siliguri
 
Gautam Buddh Nagar Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Gautam Buddh Nagar Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot ModelGautam Buddh Nagar Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Gautam Buddh Nagar Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
 

Job Evaluation.pptx

  • 3. Job Evaluation  It is a systematic process of determining the worth of one job in relation to another job in the organization.  Job evaluation is a method for comparing different jobs to provide a basis for grading and pay structure.  The relative worth of various jobs are assessed so that wages can be paid depending upon the worth of the job.  Without job evaluations, the HR department would be unable to develop a rational approach to pay. All job evaluation systems depend heavily on job analysis.
  • 4. Features of Job Evaluation  It tries to assess jobs, not people.  The basic information on which job evaluations are made is obtained from the job analysis.  Job evaluations are carried out by groups, not by individuals.  Some degree of subjectivity is always present in job evaluation.  Job evaluation does not fix pay scales but merely provides a basis for evaluating a rational wage structure.
  • 5. OBJECTIVES OF JOB EVALUATION  It helps in devising an acceptable wage.  It helps in the proper placement of workers in job.  It helps the personnel department to recruit the right person for a job since requirement of each job are clearly indicated.  It helps in formulating the internal training plan.  It helps to avoid wage and other discrimination for similar jobs in same organization or a group of organizations under the same management.
  • 6. JOB EVALUATION VS PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL It means to find the relative worthiness of a job Finding the worth of a jobholder Job evaluation analysis the job and do not take into account the individual abilities of the job holder Performance appraisal is concerned with comparative merit of individuals Aims is to determine the wage rates of different jobs Determining incentives and rewards for superior performance Shows how much a job is worth. Shows how well an individual is doing an assigned work
  • 7. Process of Job Evaluation Program • Gaining acceptance. • Creating a job evaluation committee. • Finding the jobs to be evaluated. • Analyzing and preparing a job description. • Selecting the method of evaluation. • Classifying jobs.
  • 8. Gaining Acceptance  Before undertaking job evaluation, top management must explain the aims and uses of the program to the employees and unions.  To elaborate the program further, oral presentation could be made. Letters, booklets could be used to classify all relevant aspects of the job evaluation program.
  • 9. Creating Job Evaluation Committee  It is not possible for a single person to evaluate all the key jobs in an organization. Usually, a job evaluation committee consisting of experienced employees, union representatives and HR experts is created to set the ball rolling
  • 10. Finding the Jobs to be Evaluated  Every job need not be evaluated. This may be too taxing and costly. Certain key jobs in each department may be identified. While picking up the jobs, care must be taken to ensure that they represent the type of work performed in the department.
  • 11. Analyzing and Preparing Job Description  This requires the preparation of a job description and also an analysis of job needs for successful performance.
  • 12. Selecting the Method of Evaluation  The most important method of evaluating the jobs must be identified now, keeping the job factors as well as organizational demands in mind.
  • 13. Classifying Jobs  The relative worth of various jobs in an organization may be found out after arranging jobs in order of importance using criteria such as skill requirements, experience needed, under which conditions job is performed, type of responsibilities to be shouldered, degree of supervision needed, the amount of stress caused by the job etc.  Weights can be assigned to each such factor. When we finally add all the weights, the worth of a job is determined. The points may then be converted into monetary values.
  • 14. Reviewing Periodically  In the light of changes in environmental conditions (technology, products, services, etc.), jobs need to be examined closely. For example, the traditional clerical functions have undergone a rapid change in sectors like banking, insurance and railways, after computerisation.  New job descriptions need to be written and the skill needs of new jobs need to be duly incorporated in the evaluation process. Otherwise, employees may feel that all the relevant job factors—based on which their pay has been determined— have not been evaluated properly
  • 15. Types of Job Evaluation
  • 16. Quantitative Methods  Factor Comparison Method: under this method the relative worth of a particular job will be assessed on the basis of 5 factors 1. Working conditions 2. Physical requirements 3. mental requirements 4. Skill requirements 5. Responsibilities
  • 17.  Point Method: Under this method some core elements or factors will be identified. They are  Skills  Efforts ,  Responsibilities  Working condition.  Weightage will be given to those factors separately.
  • 18.  Advantages of Points System:  (a) It is more systematic and objective than other systems.  (b) It provides numerical basis for job classification and wage differentials.  (c) Bias/favoritism minimized.  (d) A large number of jobs can be evaluated and the jobs can be placed in distinct categories.  (e) Once the factors, sub factors and points are developed, they can be used for a long time.  (f) Acceptance is better than other systems.  Limitations:  (a) It is time-consuming and expensive process.  (b) Employees find it difficult to understand the working of this method.
  • 19. Non-Quantitative  Comparison/Ranking Methods:  As per this method, jobs are arranged from highest to lowest, in order of their values or merit to the organization.  Jobs can also be arranged according to the relative difficulty in performing them.  The job at the top has the highest value and job at the lowest has the lowest value.  Jobs are arranged in each department and then department ranking are combined to develop an organization ranking.
  • 20.  Advantages of Ranking System:  The system is simple, easy to understand and easy to explain to the employees.  It require less time, less work and is less expensive.  Disadvantages:  There is no defined criteria for rating the jobs and the rating is based on judgement of the raters.  The rating may be influenced by bias/favouritism.  The systems only ranks the jobs and does not indicate the exact differences between one job and the other.
  • 21.  Job Classification or Grading Method:  Under this method, yardstick is provided in the form of job classes or grades.  The committee goes through the job description of each job and assigns it a particular grade.  There are different rates of wages for different grades of jobs. The jobs may be graded as skilled, unskilled, routine, administrative, etc.
  • 22. Decision Band Method (DBM)  The Decision Band method (DBM) of job evaluation bases itself on the premise that the value of a job to an organization depends on the level of responsibility, which is in turn manifests as the extent of decision making involved in the job.  It assumes that since all jobs require incumbents to make decisions, decision-making is a logical and equitable basis to compare jobs.
  • 23.  The methodology involves a three step process of allocating jobs into bands, grading jobs within a band into two, and then assigning sub grades to each grade, all based on the nature of extend of decisions taken as part of the job. 1. Banding 2. Grading 3. Sub- Grading
  • 24. Banding  DBM initially classifies all jobs or positions in an enterprise into six broad bands, based on the level of responsibility the job holds within the organization.
  • 25. Grading  The second step in Decision Band Job Evaluation is classifying jobs within bands according to the difficulty and effort involved in the supervisory responsibilities of such jobs.  Coordinating jobs where the incumbent supervise or monitor the work of another employee in the same band enjoy a higher grade within the band, compared to jobs that do not supervise or monitor the work of others in the same band.  For example, an extremely skilled IT programmer in Band B may concentrate on developing codes, without any supervisory roles. Another employee in band B, even though not as competent as the skilled programmer when it comes to coding skills may nevertheless have a higher grade because of being the team leader who supervise other employees
  • 26.  As a rule of thumb, each lower grade has three sub grades and each upper or higher responsibility grade has two sub grades. There is however, no set or fixed number of sub-grades, and organizational requirements decide the optimal number.
  • 27. Sub-Grading  Sub-grading involves assessing the relative difficulty, complexity, and skills required of the job in comparison to the other jobs within the same Band and Grade.  The factors used to measure such concepts include  Extent of knowledge required to complete tasks  Hard skills required for completing job tasks  Soft skills such as communication skills and customer service skills required for completing job tasks
  • 28.  The extent of time pressure the job involves  Mental effort required such as alertness and concentration  Extent of physical activity required for the job  Need for care and precision in the job  Working conditions
  • 29. Advantages of Job Evaluation • Reduction in inequalities in salary structure - It is found that people and their motivation is dependent upon how well they are being paid. Therefore the main objective of job evaluation is to have external and internal consistency in salary structure so that inequalities in salaries are reduced. • Specialization - Because of division of labour and thereby specialization, a large number of enterprises have got hundred jobs and many employees to perform them. Therefore, an attempt should be made to define a job and thereby fix salaries for it. This is possible only through job evaluation. • Helps in selection of employees - The job evaluation information can be helpful at the time of selection of candidates. The factors that are determined for job evaluation can be taken into account while selecting the employees. • Harmonious relationship between employees and manager - Through job evaluation, harmonious and congenial relations can be maintained between employees and management, so that all kinds of salaries controversies can be minimized. • Standardization - The process of determining the salary differentials for different jobs become standardized through job evaluation. This helps in bringing uniformity into salary structure. • Relevance of new jobs - Through job evaluation, one can understand the relative value of new jobs in a concern.
  • 30. Limitations of Job Evaluation  Job evaluation is not without limitations. The main limitations are as follows: 1. Job evaluation is not exactly scientific. It lacks scientific precision because all factors cannot be measured accurately. 2. Most of the techniques are difficult to understand, even for the supervisors. 3. The factors taken by the program are not exhaustive. 4. There may be wide fluctuations in compensable factors given changes in technology, values, and aspirations of employers, etc. 5. Employees, trade union leaders, management, and the program operators may assign different weights to different factors, thus creating grounds for dispute. 6. The trade unions regard job evaluation with suspicion because it is made on certain principles, and the results are generally ignored. Some of the methods of job evaluation are not easily understood by workers. Workers fear that job evaluation will do away with collective bargaining. 7. A job evaluation scheme takes a long time to install. It requires specialized personnel, and it is costly.
  • 31. Conclusion  To summarize, Job evaluation is associated with a process of establishing worth of different jobs. Job evaluation offers a basis for ranking or grading different jobs and developing a pay structure for them. It is the process of explaining the duties, authority relationships, skills, condition of work and other relevant information related to jobs. It provides valuable data and information to develop job description and specification documents. Job evaluation is a significant task of human resource manager which is done in order to determine the value or worth of each job within the organization.