2014 Dept of Energy Environmental R&D Report

FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014
1
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 2014
Prepared by Peter Saundry, Ph.D. for the COUNCIL OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEANS AND DIRECTORS,
COUNCIL OF ENERGY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION LEADERS, AND THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE AFFILIATE PROGRAM SEPTEMBER 2014
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT

2

3
Contents
Foreword ............................................................................................. 4
Summary ............................................................................................. 5
1. Energy Resources R&D ($1,851 million) ..................................... 7
1.1 Energy Efficiency ($648 million R&D) ..................................................................... 8
1.1.1 Buildings Technologies ($178 million R&D) ............................................... 8
1.1.2 Vehicle Technologies ($274 million) ........................................................ 12
1.1.3 Advanced Manufacturing ($180 million) ................................................. 15
1.2 Fossil Energy R&D ($358 million) ......................................................................... 17
1.2.1 Coal (392 million) ..................................................................................... 17
1.2.2 Natural Gas Technologies ($21 million) ................................................... 21
1.2.3 Petroleum ($15 million) ........................................................................... 21
1.3 Renewable Energy R&D ($775 million) ................................................................ 22
1.3.1 Bioenergy Technologies ($232 million) .................................................... 22
1.3.2 Geothermal Technologies ($46 million) ................................................... 25
1.3.3 Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies ($93 million) ................................. 25
1.3.4 Water Power ($59 million) ........................................................................ 26
1.3.5 Solar Energy Technologies Program ($257 million) ................................. 27
1.3.6 Wind ($88 million) .................................................................................... 29
2. Office of Science ($456 million) .................................................. 31
2.1 Office of Biological and Environmental Research ($402 million) ......................... 31
2.1.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences ($275 million) ................................. 32
2.1.2 Biological Systems Science ($89 million) .................................................. 35
2.1.3 Basic Energy Sciences ($51 million) .......................................................... 35
3. Environmental Management R&D ($10 million) .......................... 36

4
T
Foreword
he National Council for Science and Environment (NCSE) is pleased to acknowledge and express its deep appreciation to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). The AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program has provided the budget
analysis behind this report for the past fourteen years, first under Kei Koizumi and, in recent years, under Patrick Clemins and now Matthew Hourihan.
AAAS drew the data for this report from White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) R&D data, Budget of the United States Government and from agency and historical data. Yearly values are adjusted for inflation using OMB's GDP deflators. Nominal values are unadjusted. FY 2013 are estimates adjusted for the full-year continuing resolution and sequestration. The text of this report is largely drawn directly from the Department of Energy budget justification to Congress1. and to a lesser degree, from agency web sites, and other DOE resources.
This definition of Environmental R&D used in this report includes environmental physical, life and social sciences, environmental engineering, energy related fields, environmental data and information, and studies that utilize any or all of the above to address pollution problems or activities that impair the sustained functioning and productivity of the earth’s environment.
We have made no effort to analyze activities by specific “fields of science” or “scientific disciplines”.
Because terms such as “environmental science” and even “research” and “development” have imprecise definitions, estimates of federal funding for environmental R&D must be considered approximations. That is not to say the data and descriptions of particular programs are not accurate, rather that definitions are important in deciding which programs and projects to include in the analysis. We have attempted to maintain consistency over the past fourteen years in order to identify trends.
The budget of the federal government and the activities of its agencies are subject to change — sometimes significant change at short notice. We again encourage readers to explore the web sites and documents of the respective agencies and programs for the latest information.
1. FY 2015 DOE Budget Justification http://energy.gov/cfo/downloads/fy-2015-budget-justification

T
Summary
he Department of Energy (DOE) is expending $2.329 billion on environmental R&D in fiscal year 2014 (October 1, 2013 – September 30, 2014). This is a healthy 8.6% increase over FY 2013 which was severely impacted by the budget fight between Republicans and Democrats
and the subsequent “sequestration”. The FY2014 fund level is still one percent below the FY 2010 level. The long term tread in DOE Environmental R&D spending is shown in Figure 1.
DOE has major programs that aim to transform the Nation’s energy systems; and has additional responsibilities for defense- and civilian-oriented nuclear matters and other issues. DOE provides a quarter of the total federal funding for environmental R&D, the largest amount on any federal agency.
Much of DOE’s funding is directed to the U.S. government’s largest laboratory system, usually operated under contract, by the corporations or universities, or in some cases, directly by DOE.
Figure 1. DOE Environmental R&D spending 2000-2014 (budget authority in billions of constant FY 2014 dollars)
Note: Stimulus spending under "ARRA" in FY 2009 added a one-time amount of $5.6 billion in Environmental R&D. ARRA figure includes more non-R&D items than a typical year due to programmatic funding decisions.

FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 6
DOE funding is usually represented in three themes as shown in Table 1:
 Energy Resources including:
o energy efficiency in the building, transportation and manufacturing sectors;
o fossil energy in the coal, gas and petroleum sectors; and,
o renewable energy in the biomass/biofuels, geothermal, hydrogen and fuel cell, water power, solar, and wind sectors
 Science R&D including
o climate and environmental sciences;
o biological systems science related to bioenergy and biofuels; and,
o basic energy sciences related to geosciences and energy biosciences
 Environmental management addresses for the cleanup of waste, nuclear fuel and materials, contaminated soil and water, and other items at DOE facilities..
Energy resources account for 79% of the total and environmental management just 1%.
Table 1 Environmental R&D at the Department of Energy (budget authority in millions of dollars)
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
Change FY 14-13 Actual Actual Estimate Percent
Energy Resources R&D
1,798
1,708
1,851
8.3% Science R&D 438 425 456 7.2%
Environmental Management R&D
21
10
22
118.4% ____ ____ ____
TOTAL
2,257
2,144
2,329
8.6%

1. Energy Resources R&D ($1,851 million)
Managed by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), energy resources R&D includes work on energy efficiency, fossil energy and renewable energy as shown in Table 2.
Table 2. DOE funding for Energy Resources R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
Change FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 13-14
Actual
Actual
Estimate
Percent Energy Efficiency:
Building Technologies1
215
205
178
-13.1% Vehicle Technologies 321 303 290 -4.4%
Advanced Manufacturing2
113
114
180
58.0% Energy Efficiency Subtotal 648 622 648 4.2%
Fossil Energy:
Coal
359
342
392
14.7% Natural Gas 15 14 21 48.6%
Petroleum
5
5
15
224.6% Fossil Energy Subtotal 379 360 428 18.7%
Nuclear Energy 0 0 0 - -
Renewable Energy:
Biomass/Biofuels
195
185
232
25.4% Geothermal 37 35 46 30.7%
Hydrogen and Fuel Cell
101
96
93
-3.0% Water Power 58 55 59 7.1%
Solar
288
269
257
-4.5% Wind 92 86 88 2.3%
Renewable Energy Subtotal
771
726
775
6.7% ____ ____ ____
TOTAL
1,798
1,708
1,851
8.3%
Notes:
1 Excludes funding for weatherization assistance and state grants programs.

2 Formerly Industrial Technologies.
1.1 Energy Efficiency ($648 million R&D)
The Energy Efficiency program is divided into three sectors — buildings, industry and transportation. The principal focus is to develop technologies that reduce the energy requirements of equipment and facilities within those sectors while maintaining or improving services, and enhancing environmental quality.
Table 3. DOE funding for Energy Efficiency R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
Change FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 13-14
Actual
Actual
Estimate
Percent Building Technologies 215 205 178 -13.1%
Vehicle Technologies
321
303
290
-4.4% Advanced Manufacturing 113 114 180 58.0%
_____
______
______
648 622 648 +4.2%
1.1.1 Buildings Technologies ($178 million R&D)
In the United States, residential homes and commercial buildings consume 40% of the Nation’s total energy with an annual energy bill of more than $400 billion2. This translates into more than 70% of the electrical energy consumed in the U.S. These energy bills can be cost effectively reduced by 20-50% or more through various energy efficiency technologies and techniques3,4. The long‐term, overarching goal of the Building Technologies Office (BTO) is to support the development and deployment of technologies and systems to reduce building- related energy use by 50% by 2030.
Emerging Technologies ($56 million) aims to develop technologies enabling a 70 percent reduction in lighting energy use, 60 percent savings in water heating, 20 percent savings in HVAC, 20 percent savings in building envelope & windows, 20 percent savings in appliances, and 30 percent savings enabled by sensors & controls from an 2010 baseline.
2. 2011 Buildings Energy Data Book, U.S. Department of Energy (March 2012) http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/TableView.aspx?table=1.2.3
3. DOE/ASHRAE's Advanced Energy Design Guides for commercial buildings https://www.ashrae.org/standards- research--technology/advanced-energy-design-guides
4. DOE's Building America Program http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/residential/ba_index.html

Nearly half of the subprogram addresses solid-state lighting ($26 million) which supports work to both improve performance and to lower costs for Light Emitting Diode lighting (LEDs) and organic LED lighting (OLEDs). Funding focuses on core technologies such as LED emitter materials and OLED light extraction techniques, product development (i.e., novel LED luminaires, improved OLED light extraction), and manufacturing (i.e., LED luminaire manufacturing, OLED deposition equipment).
Building Envelope R&D ($10 million) supports the development of software design tools for energy efficient windows, residential attics, and heat/moisture transfer in building insulation.
Also included is support for R&D on:
 space conditioning and refrigeration R&D ($7 million);
 transactive controls ($5 million) that ensure continuous peak operating efficiency of buildings;
 analysis tools ($3 million) to help design buildings, equipment and controls, along with energy-efficiency standards, policies, and rating scales (especially the EnergyPlus tool).
 high impact technology ($5 million) provides funding to support innovative technologies and solutions that could help meet existing goals but are not represented in a significant way in the program’s existing portfolios.
DOE is seeking additional funding in FY 2015 for a Grid Integration Initiative ($7 million proposed for FY 2014) will focus on how buildings and building related systems and technologies can transact with each other and with the grid more efficiently and effectively.
Table 4. DOE funding for Buildings Technology R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015 Actual Estimate Request
Emerging Technologies
59
56
79 Commercial Buildings Integration (CBI) 34 31 28
PSU Consortium for Building Energy Innovation
23
10
10 Residential Buildings Integration (RBI) 28 24 23
Equipment and Buildings Standards
62
56
69 National Renewable Energy Lab Site-Wide Facility Support 1 3
______
______
TOTAL 205 178 212
Commercial Buildings Integration ($31 million) accelerates energy performance improvements in existing and new commercial buildings through cost‐effective technologies,

tools, and solutions; including research projects through an external competitive process. CBI has had success in three areas: demonstrating actual energy and cost savings that can be achieved with high efficiency equipment; partnering with market leaders to prove energy conservation strategies; and developing databases capturing building improvement information that reduce uncertainty associated with investment (i.e., Buildings Performance Database).
In FY 2015 CBI will invest $5 million to advance the adoption of newly commercialized or underused advanced technologies and methods to facilitate integrated low-energy building design and operation through technologies demonstrations, industry challenges, and focused investigations that establish how these technologies can be properly applied in commercial buildings throughout all climate zones in the U.S. CBI also will seek to invest $15 million to build the common data structures, tools and processes to support and drive greater investment in energy efficiency across all commercial market sectors. CBI is focused on several key areas that represent significant barriers to greater commercial investment in energy efficiency.
Pennsylvania State University (PSU) Consortium for Building Energy Innovation ($10 million), formerly the Energy Efficiency Buildings HUB, is focused in three areas: (1) To develop market-tested pathways to 50 percent energy reduction in existing small and medium commercial buildings, (2) identify and overcome market barriers in implementing energy efficiency in existing small and medium commercial buildings, and (3) accelerate adoption of energy efficient retrofit solutions at local and national scales.
Residential Building Integration ($24 million) supports the Building America Program (a consortium of building science organizations and DOE national laboratories - $14 million) which focuses on research to improve the efficiency of new and existing homes which account for 22% of total U.S. energy consumption.
Equipment and Building Standards ($56 million) supports market-based and regulatory approaches to ensure that technically feasible and economically justified energy-efficient technologies overcome barriers to widespread adoption.
The program generates cost-effective energy savings through the development of national appliance and equipment standards. Since minimum standards effectively eliminate low- efficiency products from the marketplace, the program saves energy by ensuring that products purchased, installed, and operated are energy-efficient. Test procedures and energy conservation standards developed by this program support national energy policy objectives, such as increasing energy savings and energy productivity, and reducing carbon emissions.
The program addresses market challenges or barriers in the adoption of energy efficient technologies primarily through support to Energy Star, regulatory activities, and model building code activities.
The vast majority of the test procedure and standards rulemaking activities are legislatively mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (as amended). The rulemaking schedule, and thus the level of program activity, is largely determined by existing legislation.

Since 2009, 21 new or updated standards, covering more than 30 products, have been issued and will ensure annual energy savings over the coming years. Cumulative consumer utility bill savings associated with these recently enacted standards are projected to be hundreds of billions of dollars (undiscounted) through 2030. The Equipment and Building Standards subprogram supports the goal of reducing building source energy use and will establish efficiency standards that cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 3 billion metric tons through 2030.

1.1.2 Vehicle Technologies ($274 million)
Transportation accounts for two-thirds of U.S. petroleum use, and on-road vehicles are responsible for 80 percent of this amount. The Vehicle Technologies Program seeks to develop and promote energy- efficient and environmentally friendly transportation technologies. DOE frames much of its work in this area under its 10-Year Vision for Plug-in Electric Vehicles strategy known as “EV Everywhere5”.
Table 5. DOE funding for Vehicle Technologies R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
FY 2013
FY 2014
Batteries and Electric Drive Technology
112
109
136 Vehicle and Systems Simulation & Testing 45 43 40
Advanced Combustion Engine R&D
55
50
49 Materials Technology 40 38 54
Fuels and Lubricant Technologies
17
16
27 Outreach, Deployment and Analysis 34 31 50
NREL Site-Wide Facility Support
0
2
3 ______ ______ ______
TOTAL
303
290
359
Battery and Electric Drive Technology: ($109 million) addresses the development of low-cost, high energy batteries and research and development of low-cost, efficient electric drive systems needed for plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) - both all-electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. The battery R&D activity accounts for over two-thirds of spending is focused on the development of high energy and high power battery materials and battery systems that promise to significantly reduce the cost, weight, and volume of PEV batteries. R&D is focused on the following key areas:
• Advanced Battery Materials focusing on the development of new materials and electrode couples that offer a significant improvement over today’s technologies, including: 2nd and 3rd generation lithium ion batteries, advanced electrolytes, and “beyond lithium ion” technologies, such as lithium metal batteries.
• Advanced Battery Development develops advanced PEV batteries in cooperation with industry focusing on the development of robust prototype cells, advanced fabrication processes and technology that will (1) reduce the weight and the cost of thermal management systems, structural and safety components, and electronics; (2) incorporate fast-charge capability into the design and build process; and (3) utilize robust safety technology, devices, and functionality. The development of computer aided engineering battery design tools will also be supported.
• Advanced Processing focuses on developing the scale up and manufacturing technologies necessary for market entry of the next generation of battery materials. This includes more efficient electrode and cell designs and fabrication processes to reduce the cost for high-volume production of large format lithium-ion batteries.
5 . EV Everywhere Grand Challenge: Road to Success", U.S. Department of Energy (January 2014) http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/02/f8/eveverywhere_road_to_success.pdf

Electric Drive Technology aims to develop technologies and designs to reduce cost, improve performance, and increase reliability of power electronics, electric motors, and other electric propulsion components. Activities also include R&D of advanced thermal management technologies. The electric drive cost target for FY 2015 is $12/kW ($660/system), a 25 percent reduction from the 2012 cost of $16/kW ($880/system). Efforts focus on:
• Advanced Power Electronics
• Advanced Wide Bandgap (WBG) Power Modules
• Advanced Electric Motors focuses on novel materials and advanced motor designs capable of meeting electric motor requirements without using rare earth materials.
• Advanced Thermal Management Technologies
Vehicle and Systems Simulation & Testing ($43 million) includes R&D on:
• the development and use of advanced vehicle modeling tools to identify the most promising technologies for vehicle applications (Modeling & Simulation);
• component and vehicle evaluations to validate the modeling tools, prove the long-term reliability and benefits of advanced technologies, and identify critical Research and Development (R&D) needs to improve these technologies (Vehicle Technology Evaluations);
• the development of critical codes and standards to reduce the development time for and costs of plug-in electric vehicles and components (Codes & Standards); and
• R&D of enabling technologies to improve overall vehicle efficiencies (Vehicle Systems Efficiency Improvements).
EERE plans to implement a joint $19 million funding opportunity announcement sponsored by the Vehicles Technologies program, Solar Energy Technologies program, and the Buildings Technologies program to solicit technology and tool development and demonstration activities that integrate electric vehicles, building energy management systems, and solar generation technologies into the grid distribution system.
Advanced Combustion Engine R&D ($50 million) focuses on removing critical technical barriers to commercializing high efficiency, advanced internal combustion engines for passenger and commercial vehicles - one of the most cost effective approaches to reducing the petroleum consumption of the Nation's fleet of vehicles in the near- to mid-term. Areas of R&D include:
• Combustion and Emission Control - improving thermal efficiency by optimizing combustion, fuel injection, air handling, emission control, and waste heat recovery systems, along with reducing friction and pumping losses. The program aims to initiate new projects to increase passenger vehicle fuel economy by 35 to 50 percent by 2020 compared to a 2009 baseline. It will also develop emission control systems.
• Solid State Energy Conversion focuses on technologies to convert waste heat from engines and other sources directly to electrical energy to improve fuel economy and reduce emissions. This activity aims to develop and fabricate high efficiency thermoelectric generators to produce electricity from waste heat in passenger vehicles.

Materials Technology ($38 million) supports vehicle lightweighting and improved propulsion efficiency.
The primary focus is on Lightweight Materials Technology which addresses technology gaps that currently prevent the further introduction of advanced lightweight materials into vehicles - cost, performance, and manufacturing barriers as well as a lack of adequate design tools. Developing and demonstrating advanced steels, aluminum alloys, magnesium alloys, carbon fiber composites, and multi-material systems with performance and manufacturability that greatly exceed today’s technologies. In FY 2015, the Lightweight Materials activity will emphasize multi-material assembly; aluminum sheet and extrusion components; carbon fiber precursors, carbon fiber composites, Mg alloys, and validate weight reduction and crashworthiness of a multi-material vehicle. The Lightweight Materials activity will support the demonstration of ultra-lightweight sub-structures such as doors and hoods.
A smaller focus on Propulsion Materials Technology supports developing and demonstrating materials for vehicle powertrains with greatly improved properties compared to the state-of-the- art. In FY 2015, the focus will be on materials that enable downsized, high-efficiency engines that provide the greatest opportunity for improvements in overall powertrain efficiency.
Fuels and Lubricant Technologies ($16 million) develops technologies that reduce petroleum consumption through vehicle powertrain efficiency improvements and alternative fuels petroleum displacement. Activities fall into three main categories: 1) alternative and renewable fuels, such as natural gas-derived fuels, drop-in biofuels, and other renewable fuels; 2) lubricant technologies that can reduce friction losses in new and legacy vehicles to improve fuel economy; and 3) the use of unique, non-conventional fuel properties to improve efficiency.
Outreach, Deployment and Analysis ($31 million) includes a portfolio of activities to catalyze the widespread adoption of advanced vehicle technologies. These include Vehicle Technologies Deployment, which enables and works with a nationwide network of local public/private partnerships (Clean Cities coalitions), bringing together key stakeholders to help accelerate the use of alternative fuel and energy-efficient vehicle technologies.
This activity also supports the annual DOE/EPA Fuel Economy Guide publication and associated website, www.fueleconomy.gov, as well as the development and dissemination of related data (required by law) to the public.
The Advanced Vehicle Competitions activity encourages university student engineers to participate in advanced technology development—helping to address the need for more highly- trained engineers in advanced vehicle technologies to overcome barriers in the marketplace.
The Legacy Fleet Improvement activity focuses on advanced tire technology—which, given tire usage/turnover and the ability for rapid market entry, offer a tremendous opportunity for petroleum reduction across the Nation’s existing fleet of passenger and commercial vehicles.

The Outreach, Deployment and Analysis subprogram also includes a Legislative and Rulemaking activity focused on a variety of DOE statutory responsibilities established in the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005 and other statutes and legislation, primarily related to requirements for state and alternative fuel providers to operate alternative fuel vehicle fleets.
1.1.3 Advanced Manufacturing ($180 million)
The Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) supports a targeted technology portfolio that accelerates research, development, demonstration, and deployment of these technologies to increase the energy efficiency, productivity, and competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing6.
Table 6. DOE funding for Advanced Manufacturing R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
FY 2013
FY 2014
Next Generation Manufacturing R&D Projects
42
77
86 Advanced Manufacturing R&D Facilities 55 82 191
Industrial Technical Assistance
18
22
29 NREL Site-Wide Facility Support 0 0 0
______
______
______ TOTAL 114 180 305
Next Generation Manufacturing R&D Projects ($77 million) focus on the development of industry-specific and cross-cutting manufacturing technologies as a central element of EERE’s Clean Energy Manufacturing Initiative (CEMI). In FY 2014, the Advanced Manufacturing program will have completed funding for all competitively selected R&D projects under the broad Innovative Manufacturing Initiative Funding Opportunity Announcement that closed in Dec. 2011. Additional funding supports one or more targeted projects in different foundational technology areas, including steel and combined heat and power.
In FY 2015, the program seeks to fund three to four new R&D projects at approximately $20 million each, in different or complementary foundational technology solutions to manufacturing challenges. Examples of candidate topics include cross-cutting microwave and radio frequency process technologies which could reduce heating requirements in numerous energy intensive industries; innovative membranes which could reduce separation energy requirements in industries including desalination, food processing, helium extraction, and chemicals production; and advanced low cost composites. In addition, an Advanced Manufacturing Incubator for
6 A National Strategic Plan for Advanced Manufacturing, Executive Office of the President National Science and Technology Council (February 2012), http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/11/f4/nstc_feb2012.pdf

High-Impact Foundational Technology FOA will supplement the individual targeted FOAs and is planned at approximately $14 million.
Advanced Manufacturing R&D Facilities subprogram ($82 million) supports public-private partnership facilities for foundational manufacturing R&D. The subprogram also supports the transition of innovative, next generation material processes and production technologies to American manufacturing firms, including the most energy-intensive industries. The program’s facilities include:
• Clean Energy Manufacturing Innovation Institutes which include the Institute for Composites Materials and Structures and the Next Generation Power Electronics Manufacturing Innovation Institute. In FY 2015, DOE hopes to support up to $70 million for the creation and forward funding of at least one new Clean Energy Manufacturing Innovation Institute. These Institutes are consistent with the President’s vision for a larger multi-agency National Network for Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI).
• Critical Materials Hub centered on the Critical Materials Institute at Ames National Laboratory focuses on rare earth elements that possess unique magnetic, catalytic, and luminescent properties including dysprosium, neodymium, terbium, europium, and yttrium.
• Manufacturing Demonstration Facility based at Oak Ridge National Lab focused on Additive Manufacturing and Low-cost Carbon Fiber.
These facilities are designed to accelerate the development and implementation of cutting edge technologies and help the United States position itself as a world leader in manufacturing by bringing together manufacturers, research institutions, suppliers, and universities.
Industrial Technical Assistance ($22 million) is implemented through the Combined Heat and Power (CHP) deployment activities including the CHP Technical Assistance Partnerships (formerly known as Clean Energy Application Centers; the Better Buildings Better Plants Program; Industrial Assessment Centers; and the Superior Energy Performance International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Certification. Through these activities, the subprogram’s goals are to assist in the deployment of 40 gigawatts of new, cost-effective combined heat and power (CHP) by 2020, demonstrate the technical and economic viability of improved energy management approaches, and support a reduction in manufacturing energy intensity by 25% over ten years.

1.2 Fossil Energy R&D ($358 million)
The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) advances technologies related to the reliable, efficient, affordable, and environmentally sound use of fossil fuels. FE leads Federal research, development, and demonstration efforts on advanced carbon capture, and storage (CCS) technologies to facilitate achievement of the President’s climate goals. FE also develops technological solutions for the prudent and sustainable development of our unconventional domestic resources.
Table 7. DOE funding for Fossil Fuel R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
Change FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 13-14
Actual
Actual
Estimate
Percent Coal 359 342 392 14.7%
Natural Gas
15
14
21
48.6% Petroleum 5 5 15 224.6%
__
____
____
TOTAL 379 360 428 18.7%
1.2.1 Coal ($392 million)
DOE is developing advanced fossil energy technology that will facilitate the commercial deployment of highly efficient fossil power plants capable of achieving near-zero atmospheric emissions. Thus, the environmental R&D goes under the heading Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS) and Power Systems which has four key areas of focus. Funding is requested in FY 2015 for a fifth focus – CCS Demonstrations.
Table 8. DOE funding for Clean Coal R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
FY 2013
FY 2014
CCS Demonstrations
Natural Gas Carbon Capture and Storage 0 0 25
CCS and Power Systems
Carbon Capture 64 92 77
Carbon Storage
107
109
80 Advanced energy systems 92 100 51
Cross-cutting research
46
42
35 NETL Coal Research and Development 33 50 34
______
______
______ TOTAL 342 392 277

Carbon Capture ($92 million) focuses on the development of post-combustion and precombustion CO2 capture and compression technologies for new and existing fossil fuel-fired power plants and industrial sources. Post-combustion CO2 capture technology R&D is focused on capturing CO2 from flue gas after the fuel has been consumed/combusted. Precombustion CO2 capture is applicable to systems that capture and separate the CO2 from mixed gas streams prior to combustion or utilization of the gas.
The Post-Combustion subactivity focuses specifically on developments related to 2nd generation technologies that can achieve CO2 capture at $40/tonne CO2 capture cost for new and existing fossil fuel-fired power plants. 2nd generation technologies are those that are not currently in commercial application at any scale or level of integration, but have potential to improve the efficiency or reliability of carbon capture processes. Significant improvements in both cost and efficiency of CO2 separation and compression will be required to achieve this goal. Critical R&D milestones have been achieved by laboratory- through pilot-scale testing of a broad spectrum of CO2 capture approaches including advanced solvents, sorbents, and membranes since 2008; and initiation of multiple, small-scale (0.5-1 MWe) slipstream tests of the most promising of these CO2 capture technologies that began in 2010. FY 2015 activities continue support of second generation and transformational technologies for fossil fuel-fired plants, and initiation of larger-scale pilot tests of advanced post-combustion capture concepts and components.
The Pre-Combustion subactivity focuses on development of 2nd generation and transformational technologies for precombustion capture that achieve CO2 capture at $40/tonne removed CO2 capture cost. Significant improvements are required to reduce parasitic energy load and cost, and many technologies that are available in the near-term have not been scaled up or applied to fossil fuel-powered generation systems. FY 2015 funding continues the support of laboratory, bench, and small slipstream-scale tests of 2nd generation and transformational technologies, such as advanced solvents, sorbents, and membranes, including process intensification efforts which incorporate two or more technology concepts.
Carbon Storage ($109 million) aims to develop and validate technologies to ensure safe and permanent geologic storage of captured CO2. Development and validation of these technologies is critical to ensure industry and regulatory agencies have the capability to assess, monitor and mitigate storage risks for CO2 onshore and offshore and ensure the viability of carbon storage as an effective technology solution that can be implemented on a large-scale to mitigate carbon emissions. Applied R&D and field projects are being conducted in five primary storage types (saline formations, oil and natural gas reservoirs, unmineable coal seams, basalts, and organic shales) in geologic reservoirs across eleven different geologic storage formation classes. Technologies developed and validated through the Carbon Storage Program will improve storage efficiency and reduce the overall cost of CCS with a goal of ensuring the cost effective ability to ensure 99 percent storage permanence of injected CO2 in all storage types while minimizing the environmental footprint of carbon storage activities. Included is:

 Support for Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships (which will be renamed Storage Infrastructure in FY 2015) which focus on development and validation of technologies, infrastructure, and human capital through eight large-scale and three small-scale field projects. The aim is to improve understanding of CO2 injection, fluid flow and pressure migration, and geomechanical and geochemical impacts from CO2 injection, and develop a “commercial toolbox” for cost-effective monitoring in all storage types. In FY 2015, one additional large-scale project plans to initiate injection. Additional new projects were planned for FY2014 and are planned for FY 2015. This area accounts for two-thirds ($71 million) of carbon storage R&D.
 Geologic Storage Technologies ($16 million) focuses on developing and validating storage and simulation and risk assessment technologies that have the potential to safely, permanently, and cost effectively store CO2 in geologic reservoirs onshore and offshore.
 Monitoring, Verification, Accounting, and Assessment (MVAA - $10 million) focuses on developing robust technologies to monitor the transport and fate of injected CO2.
 Carbon Use and Reuse ($1 million) focuses on pathways and novel approaches for reducing CO2 emissions by developing beneficial uses for the CO2. No new projects are planned.
 Carbon Sequestration Science ($10 million) supports projects in (1) Reservoir and seal performance; (2) Geologic storage site optimization and operations; (3) Reservoir capacity and storage efficiencies; (4) Integrated reservoir modeling and monitoring technologies; (5) Resource assessment and geospatial data management; and, (6) CO2 use, re-use and conversion
Advanced Energy Systems ($100 million) focuses on increasing the availability and efficiency of fossil energy systems integrated with CO2 capture, while maintaining the highest environmental standards at the lowest cost. The program elements focus on gasification, oxy- combustion, advanced turbines, and other energy systems. While the primary focus is on coal- based power systems, improvements to these technologies will result in positive spillover benefits that also reduce the cost of converting other carbon-based materials, such as biomass, petcoke or natural gas, into power and value-added products in an environmentally-acceptable manner. Included are:
 Advanced Combustion Systems ($19 million) focuses on advanced combustion technologies, such as pressurized oxy-combustion and chemical looping processes, which have the potential to achieve $40/tonne CO2 capture cost. There is also a focus on high performance materials to validate the performance of the alloys developed in the Cross-Cutting Materials R&D.
 Gasification Systems ($36 million) focuses on systems that convert fossil fuels to electricity and marketable by-products. It aims to: (1) increase the efficiency of fuel and oxygen feed to Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power systems with CO2 capture; (2) improve high- pressure solid feed systems; (3) facilitate cofeeding of coal with biomass or waste; (4) encourage more efficient high-pressure operation of dry feed gasifiers; and, (5) further develop Ion Transport Membrane technology. In addition, this activity supports development of durable refractory materials, creates models to better understand the kinetics and particulate behavior of fuel inside a gasifier, and develops solutions to mitigate the plugging and fouling of syngas coolers.

 The Hydrogen Turbines ($15 million) focuses on turbine component technologies capable of withstanding the high temperatures and aggressive environments that are predicted for high- hydrogen content syngas combustion. Specifically, research focuses on rig testing of materials and components to be used in commercial scale machines, including combustor components, rotating parts, and cooling systems.
 Coal and Coal Biomass to Liquids ($5 million) focuses on technologies to foster the commercial adoption of coal and coal/biomass gasification and the production of affordable liquid fuels and hydrogen with excellent environmental performance. DOE plans to end this support in FY 2015.
 Solid Oxide Fuel Cells ($25 million) focuses on the research and development to enable the generation of efficient, cost-effective electricity from coal with near-zero atmospheric emissions of CO2 and air pollutants and minimal use of water in central power generation applications that can be integrated with carbon capture and storage. FY 2015 activities will focus on advanced materials development.
Cross-cutting Research ($42 million) fosters the development of innovative systems for improving availability, efficiency, and environmental performance of advanced energy systems with carbon capture and storage. The Program serves as a bridge between basic and applied research by targeting concepts that offer the potential for transformational breakthroughs and step change benefits in the way energy systems are designed, constructed, and operated. This includes:
 Plant Optimization Technologies
o Sensors and Controls
o Cross-cutting Materials R&D
o Advanced Ultra-supercritical Materials R&D
o Water Management R&D
o Computational Sciences and Modeling
 Coal Utilization Science
o Computational System Dynamics
o Computational Energy Science
 Energy Analyses
 University Training and Research
o University Coal Research
o HBCU's, Education, and Training
 International Activities, including support for the International Energy Agency Clean Coal Center.
NETL Coal Research and Development ($50 million) supports the National Energy Technology Laboratory staff associated with conducting in-house research activities for the Coal R&D programs. This also includes $15 million to perform an assessment and analysis of the feasibility of economically recovering rare earth elements from coal and coal byproduct streams, such as fly ash, coal refuse, and aqueous effluents.

1.2.2 Natural Gas Technologies ($21 million)
The mission of the Natural Gas program is to support DOE missions in energy, environment, and national security. The Natural Gas Technologies program includes;
 Environmentally Prudent Development supports a multiagency research effort to address high priority challenges to safe and prudent development of unconventional resources.
 Midstream Natural Gas Infrastructure will develop technologies and communicate results to stakeholders to mitigate methane emissions from natural gas transmission, distribution, and storage facilities.
 Gas Hydrates conducts research to evaluate the occurrence, nature, and behavior of naturally occurring gas hydrates and the resulting resource, hazard, and environmental implications.
1.2.3 Petroleum ($15 million)
The mission of the Unconventional Fossil Energy Technologies from Petroleum – Oil Technologies Program is to provide information and technologies that will assure sustainable, reliable, affordable, and environmentally sound supplies of domestic unconventional fossil energy resources. No funding has been requested for FY 2015.

1.3 Renewable Energy R&D ($775 million)
Table 9. DOE funding for Renewable Energy R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
Change FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 13-14
Actual
Actual
Estimate
Percent Biomass/Biofuels 195 185 232 25.4%
Geothermal
37
35
46
30.7% Hydrogen and Fuel Cell 101 96 93 -3.0%
Water Power
58
55
59
7.1% Solar 288 269 257 -4.5%
Wind
92
86
88
2.3% ____ ____ ____
TOTAL
771
726
775
6.7%
1.3.1 Bioenergy Technologies ($232 million)
The Bioenergy Technologies program’s mission is to catalyze the development of a domestic capability to produce cost-competitive renewable fuels from non-food biomass resources. The potential exists to displace approximately 30 percent of the country's present petroleum consumption without impacting food or feed needs, and to have a positive impact on the environment by significantly reducing GHG emissions, by 20307. The Renewable Fuel Standard mandates the production of 36 billion gallons of advanced biofuels by FY 2022. Recent studies indicate that this will require more than 500 biorefineries8.
The program supports research, development, demonstration, and deployment (RDD&D) on technologies that transform the robust, renewable biomass resources of the U.S. into commercially viable, high-performance biofuels, bioproducts, and biopower, primarily through public-private partnerships.
Cellulosic ethanol was the program’s initial focus because it could easily be blended into the gasoline fuel pool, in order to address the need for increased octane content. However, it cannot be blended with diesel or jet fuel or be integrated within the existing refinery system.
7. U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry (August 2011) http://www1.eere.energy.gov/bioenergy/pdfs/billion_ton_update.pdf
8 A USDA Regional Roadmap to Meeting the Biofuels Goals of the Renewable Fuels Standard by 2022. (June 23, 2010.) U.S. Department of Agriculture, http://www.usda.gov/documents/USDA_Biofuels_Report_6232010.pdf.

The program’s focus has now moved to “drop-in hydrocarbon biofuels”, including renewable gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel — as well as chemicals and products. These bio-based hydrocarbon fuels are more compatible with today’s engines and fuel delivery infrastructure. To address the next wave of technologies, the program is pursuing multiple pathways, including thermochemical-, catalytic-, biochemical- and hybrid-conversion routes of lingo-cellulosic and algal feedstocks with the goal of achieving $3/Gasoline gallon equivalent (gge) by 2022 with at least 50 percent GHG reduction on a lifecycle basis with several down-selected technologies in order to provide optimal solutions.
The program also supports RDD&D on sustainable feedstock supply, and logistics, cost competitive conversion process including cost-shared scale up and construction of integrated biorefineries.
Table 10. DOE funding for Bioenergy Technologies R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
FY 2013
FY 2014
Feedstocks
47
47
31 Conversion Technologies 75 101 101
Demonstration and Deployment (formerly Integrated Biorefineries)
44
65
105 Strategic Analysis and Cross-Cutting Sustainability 15 12 11
Biopower
4
2
0 NREL Site-Wide Facility Support 0 5 6
____
____
____ TOTAL 185 232 253
Feedstocks ($47 million) develops technologies, processes, and engineered systems to cost effectively deliver high quality biomass to the entire spectrum of potential conversion processes. It includes:
 Feedstock production research focused on producing sufficient, sustainable, affordable biomass feedstocks to support the development of the biomass conversion industry.
 Feedstock logistics R&D on harvesting, collection, in-field handling and drying, storage, preprocessing, and transport of biomass feedstocks.
 Algae and Advanced Feedstocks R&D to develop cost-effective algal biofuels production and logistics systems and includes the development of validated models for techno-economic, sustainability, and engineering analyses.
Conversion Technologies ($101 million) technologies for converting biomass feedstocks into commercially viable liquid transportation fuels, as well as bioproducts and biopower. The program is focused on hydrocarbon fuel production to increase compatibility with existing infrastructure and to displace a larger percentage of petroleum use. This includes:

 Deconstruction and Fractionation R&D to address interactions between blended feedstock properties and deconstruction processes. This includes the examination of biomass structures, properties, and feeder mechanisms, balancing costs for feedstock blending and preparation and costs for feeding and conversion. R&D will also be conducted to resolve remaining technical barriers for the most promising deconstruction pathways.
 Synthesis and Upgrading R&D seeks to develop of biological organisms and chemical catalysts for the conversion of hydrolysis intermediates to fuels and products. In FY 2015 R&D will include: improved catalyst performance for the upgrading of hydrolysis intermediates to final fuels; and, seamless deployment of technology into the existing infrastructure.
 Validation of Technical Progress.
 Separations, Integration and Enabling Technologies including process intensification, such as combining or eliminating reaction steps and increasing the overall efficiency of deconstruction processes. Separation technologies necessary to remove impurities from hydrolysis, oils and gaseous intermediates, and product mixtures will also remain a critical R&D focus in FY 2015.
 Bioproducts and Clean Energy Manufacturing for low-cost carbon fibers.
 Waste-to-Energy to manage variable feedstocks, such as municipal solid waste.
 Conversion Incubator to identify and develop promising technologies.
Demonstration and Deployment (formerly Integrated Biorefineries) ($65 million) seeks to “de-risk” bioenergy production technologies through validated proof of performance at the pilot, demonstration, and pioneer scales. To this end, the subprogram manages a diverse portfolio of integrated biorefinery projects focused on the scale up of biofuels production. The current portfolio of 25 projects includes 4 at commercial scale, 5 at demonstration scale, 12 at pilot scale, and 4 additional projects selected under at the Innovative Pilot FOA to support aviation and military fuel applications.
The conversion pathways addressed include 13 biochemical technologies, 7 thermochemical technologies, and 5 algal technologies. The active portfolio includes 13 projects that focus on cellulosic ethanol and 12 projects that focus on renewable hydrocarbons, and one project focused on a renewable intermediate bioproduct chemical.
In 2013, the U.S. first pioneer, cellulosic ethanol plant began production and commercial sale of product with assistance from the D&D subprogram. In FY 2013 and FY 2014, the program continued cost-reduction efforts for thermochemical conversion of biomass to a diesel gasoline blendstock. In FY 2014, two more commercial plants are scheduled for commissioning with assistance from the DOE. Much of this work is carried out under the Defense Production Act in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Department of Defense.
Strategic Analysis and Cross-Cutting Sustainability ($12 million) activities support decision making, demonstrating progress, and directing research activities; they are instrumental in setting the entire biofuel value chain on an environmentally, socially, and economically viable course.
Biopower ($2 million) has focused on cookstoves. DOE plans to end this program in FY 2015.

1.3.2 Geothermal Technologies ($46 million)
The mission of the Geothermal Technologies program is to accelerate the deployment of domestic electricity generation from geothermal resources. There is currently an installed capacity of 3.4 GW in the U.S., with an estimated 30 GW of new undiscovered hydrothermal resources and 100+ GW of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS - engineered reservoirs, created where there is hot rock but little to no natural permeability or fluid saturation present in the subsurface.) Investment is made in R&D and demonstration-scale projects that will catalyze commercial adoption in two closely related geothermal categories, hydrothermal and EGS.
 Enhanced Geothermal Systems program which provides awards for R&D at industry-run EGS demonstration projects; and a Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE). FORGE is a dedicated EGS field lab site where novel technologies and techniques can be tested, with a central focus on EGS optimization and validation.
 Hydrothermal R&D focused on supporting the development of technologies necessary to effectively find and access “blind” resources at lower cost, enabling them to be developed and brought online by the private sector.
 Low Temperature and Coproduced Resources subprogram is focused on targeted RD&D for geothermal resources below a temperature of 300°F (150°C); as well as geothermal resources that can be co-developed with existing well-field infrastructure, with strategic or critical materials or in combination with other clean energy technologies.
 Systems Analysis subprogram is to identify and address barriers to geothermal adoption in the U.S., and validate and assess technical progress across the geothermal sector.
1.3.3 Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies ($93 million)
The mission of the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Program is to enable the widespread commercialization of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies, which would reduce petroleum use, greenhouse gas emissions, and criteria air pollutants.
The program’s portfolio focuses on both fuel cell R&D and hydrogen fuel R&D, with an emphasis on renewable pathways, delivery, and storage of hydrogen, to meet cost and performance goals. Near term efforts in real-world demonstration and validation help to accelerate market growth and provide critical feedback for future R&D. The portfolio also addresses a number of non-technical factors, such as user confidence, ease of financing, the availability of codes and standards, and helping to enable the establishment of a refueling infrastructure, particularly for Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs).
 Fuel Cell R&D ($33 million) aims to improve the durability, reduce the cost, and improve the performance (e.g., power, start-up time, and transient response) of fuel cell systems, with emphasis on stack and system balance of plant (BOP) components. In FY 2015, the program plans to allocate its funds to fuel cell stack component R&D (including catalysts, membranes, and MEA integration), stack and component operation and performance (including durability, impurities, and mass transport), and work on systems and system integration, balance of plant components, testing, technical analysis, and high throughput combinatorial approaches.

 Hydrogen Fuel R&D ($37 million) supports materials research and technology development to enable the production of low-cost hydrogen with emphasis on renewable pathways and address key challenges to hydrogen delivery and storage. The overarching goal is to enable several different domestic production approaches—at a variety of scales ranging from large, centralized production to small, local (distributed) production—that will achieve a hydrogen cost of less than $4/gge, dispensed and untaxed, in 2020.
 Manufacturing R&D ($3 million) supports the development of advanced fabrication technologies and processes to meet the cost targets of critical hydrogen and fuel cell technologies.
 Systems Analysis ($3 million) provides the analytical and technical basis for informed decision making for the program’s R&D direction and prioritization.
 Technology Validation ($6 million) provides accurate assessments of the state of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies—providing valuable feedback to R&D efforts, and validating the performance of pre-commercial technologies to enable informed decisions for public and private investment in continued R&D or commercial deployment.
 Safety, Codes and Standards ($7 million) conducts R&D that provides critical data required for the development of technically sound codes and standards, which will be needed for the widespread commercialization and safe deployment of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies.
 Market Transformation ($3 million) integrates the outcomes of the other programs with early market deployments.
1.3.4 Water Power ($59 million)
The Water Power program advances innovative technologies that could generate cost- effective renewable electricity from a wide range of water power resources. Activities occur in two areas:
 Hydropower Technologies ($17 million) focuses on energy from domestic rivers, streams, and water conveyance systems. Hydropower currently provides approximately 7 percent of the Nation’s electricity and produces 56 percent of all renewable generation, with 78 GW of installed capacity. In FY 2015, DOE plans to launch a new initiative, HydroNEXT, to accelerate the use of hydropower through program activities to lower the cost, improve the performance, and reduce the environmental impacts of hydropower. HydroMax seeks to improve performance and flexibility, and increase generation of existing hydropower assets.
 Marine and Hydrokinetic Technologies ($41 million) focuses on energy from waves and ocean/tidal/river currents. The program validates open-source advanced design tools for industry to allow for the simulation of device array designs and array impacts on marine surroundings. It advances system designs of MHK devices for test, evaluation, and comparison through applied research efforts. It also supports tidal projects; advanced manufacturing principals and lightweight MHK devices; emerging technologies; and research that addresses key environmental uncertainties.

1.3.5 Solar Energy Technologies Program ($257 million)
Known as the “SunShot Initiative”9, the goal is make solar energy technologies, including both semiconductor Photovoltaic (PV) and Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) technologies, cost-competitive with fossil fuel based sources of electricity, without subsidies, by 2020 - requiring cost reductions of 50% to 75% relative to 2010 baseline levels. In 2013 an estimated 4.3 GW of PV was deployed, almost a 10 fold increase from 200910.
Table 11. DOE funding for Solar Energy R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
FY 2013
FY 2014
Concentrating Solar Power
43
49
61 Photovoltaic R&D 51 57 42
Systems Integration
46
53
57 Balance of Systems Soft Cost Reduction 30 43 45
Innovations in Manufacturing Competitiveness
0
44
68 NREL Site Wide Facility Support 0 12 9
____
____
____ TOTAL 269 257 282
Concentrating Solar Power R&D ($49 million) has the near-term goal of reducing the levelized cost of CSP energy at utility scale by a 70% from the FY 2010 baseline to $0.06/kWh by 2020, cost competitive with traditional electricity sources. Starting in FY 2013, the program has shifted its focus the majority of efforts to CSP towers (from CSP troughs). This prioritization was made because towers offer higher temperatures and therefore higher efficiencies. Work occurs in the following areas:
 CSP Advanced Research focuses on (1) high temperature materials used in CSP systems; (2) characterize and test materials developed in cooperation with industry; and, (3) broaden and unify test methods to standardize qualification requirements. Additionally, the National Labs work on optical tool development and performance and techno-economic modeling software.
 Advanced Solar Power Cycles R&D to develop advanced supercritical CO2 (sCO2) Brayton cycle power systems offering higher efficiency and lower cooling water needs compared with conventional steam-Rankine cycles. This technology pathway has the opportunity to not only enable CSP to achieve the SunShot objectives, but also to revolutionize the entire power generation industry.
 “COLLECTS” R&D explores novel collection strategies for CSP applications, including, but not limited to, high-quality optics, ultra-low-cost collectors, material-efficient structures, snap- in-place facets, lenses/membranes, gradient-index (GRIN) lenses, waveguides, collector pods, passive tracking, collector fluidics, photo-responsive materials.
9. SunShot Vision Study. (February 2012) http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/SunShot/vision_study.html
10 “U.S. Solar Market Insight Report: 2012 Year in Review,” GTM Research and SEIA, March 2013. Includes solar energy firms working in installation, manufacturing, sales and distribution, project development, R&D, etc. http://www.seia.org/research-resources/us-solar-market-insight-2012-year-review

Photovoltaic R&D ($57 million) has the near-term goal of reducing the levelized cost of solar PV energy at utility scale (cents/kWh) to $0.11/kWh without subsidies by the end of FY 2015. The goal endpoint is $0.06 /kWh by 2020, cost competitive with traditional electricity sources. The SunShot program advances the state-of-the-art in PV by taking a technology-agnostic approach to funding R&D across the technology type and readiness spectrum with industry, academic and National Laboratory partners through a competitive process. Specifically, the program does the following:
• Seeds funding for new types of materials and device approaches that enable higher PV performance, greater reliability, and reduced cost as manufacturing and deployment scale.
• Funds translational research and development to bridge gaps between applied research accomplishments and device and materials development and manufacturing environment needs.
The program includes:
• SunShot Postdoctoral Research Awards.
• National Center for Photovoltaics (NCPV) and its foundational research applicable to applied problems (such as model systems for known materials), materials and device optimization and study to advance existing and emerging photovoltaic technologies, and the development of new measurement and characterization techniques.
• BRIDGE II grants to collaborative research teams.
• Recycling R&D to find economical ways of reclaiming and disposing of PV modules that have either failed in the field or are at the end of the service life.
Systems Integration ($53 million) supports solutions that allow increasing amounts of solar energy to integrate seamlessly into the electricity grid while mitigating associated risks. Such solutions can improve system reliability and encourage widespread deployment of solar technologies, such as PV and CSP.
This program supports the national laboratories and Regional Test and Evaluation Partnerships to test the reliability of new products and demonstrate their “bankability” in an unbiased manner. The subprogram also focuses on technical areas such as variability, voltage regulation, power quality, protection, and unintentional islanding where systems continue to energize local electric loads after unplanned disconnection from the utility source. The approaches include developing advanced grid-friendly PV interconnection technologies, validating inverter and system models, proactively engaging with external stakeholders, and updating codes. Also supported are:
• SolarPEN R&D on technologies that enable utilities to integrate higher levels of Solar Penetration.
• Stored Sun R&D to adapt existing energy storage technologies for integration with distributed solar PV applications.

• Grid Integration Initiative to allow customer owned electric vehicles, distributed renewable generation, and building equipment to be integrated to optimize their overall performance and designed to interact with the utility grid and better meet grid requirements as the concentration of these technologies on the grid increases.
Balance of Systems Soft Cost Reduction ($43 million) addresses the non-hardware barriers associated with the deployment of solar energy which can amount to approximately half of the total installed cost of a residential installation. Particular areas of focus include:
• Research and Analysis at the National Laboratories.
• Increasing local solar accessibility through novel partnerships and challenge frameworks.
• Solar Training Networks to increase training at community colleges to meet the growing demand for workers in the solar industry.
• Autonomous Energy Viability Assessor (AEVA) and partnership with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) on solar on public lands.
• Solar informatics.
• Partnerships Uniting Localities, Students and Energy (PULSE).
Innovations in Manufacturing Competitiveness (the “Clean Energy Manufacturing Initiative” - $44 million) aims to reverse the trend of offshoring of PV cell and module manufacturing through innovations and automation that can enable American companies to manufacture competitively. It also seeks to strengthen the Nation’s competitive advantage in the solar energy manufacturing value chain.
• SunShot Incubator 10 - early-stage assistance to help small business commercialize innovative solar technologies.
• SolarMat III - development of solar manufacturing technologies, such as supply chain R&D, to support U.S. manufacturing.
• SunPath II - supporting the initial ramp up to pilot-scale manufacturing of innovative new manufacturing processes and tools.
• Massively Parallel Combinatorial Process - Development for Competitive Manufacturing: to rapidly screen and optimize processes to enable competitive U.S. manufacturing.
• PV Manufacturing Initiative: a consortia of industry and university partners and multi-user manufacturing development facilities to speed the implementation of new cutting edge technologies in industry manufacturing processes.
1.3.6 Wind ($88 million)
The mission of the Wind Energy program is to accelerate widespread U.S. deployment of clean, affordable, and reliable wind power to promote energy security, economic growth, and environmental quality. The program includes:

Resource Characterization & Technology RD&T ($34 million) supports activities from conceptual design to manufacturing process development to testing at scale to improve wind component, system, and plant technologies for land-based, offshore, and distributed wind systems.
• The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) support the development of detailed product design tools
• Offshore Specific Wind RD&T support research including innovative fixed and floating substructure concepts, and the development of an offshore meteorology reference facility to drive instrumentation validation and model improvement.
• Resource Characterization supports progress towards improved characterization of highly turbulent wind resources, component innovation, whole system optimization, improved manufacturing, and product certification.
• Wind Energy Incubator awards provides assistance to help businesses and researchers to shorten the time between laboratory-scale proof of concept and prototype development.
Technology Validation and Market Transformation ($21 million) seeks to demonstrate and validate new wind energy technologies—for land-based, offshore, and distributed applications—in the U.S. In FY 2015 the focus is on overcoming the significant hurdles faced in building a U.S. offshore wind industry.
Mitigate Market Barriers ($10 million) focus on (1) improving the understanding of risks to sensitive wildlife species to better inform regulatory and permitting decision makers; (2) research to develop solutions to wind turbine-radar interactions; (3) developing tools and analysis that better describe wind plants for grid system planning and grid operations analysis purposes; (4) education and outreach to disseminate information and promote public understanding of wind technologies; and (5) engagement with permitting agencies to promote regulatory efficiency and ensure viable regulatory pathways for evolving technology.
Modeling and Analysis ($14 million) includes wind-specific estimations of electricity production cost, electric sector capacity expansion, and national energy-economy modeling activities. Specific focus areas include wind technical and economic feasibility analysis, and technology deployment analysis.
National Renewable Energy Lab Site-Wide Facility Support ($9 million)

2. Office of Science ($456 million)
DOE’s Office of Science is the nation’s largest federal sponsor of basic research in the physical sciences and the lead federal agency supporting fundamental scientific research for energy, providing more than 40 percent of total funding for physics, chemistry, materials science, and other areas of the physical sciences. The Office of Science supports about 25,000 investigators at over 300 U.S. academic institutions and at all of the DOE laboratories.
Environmental R&D constitutes about 9% of the budget of the Office of Science. Activities include advancing a clean energy agenda through fundamental research on energy production, conversion, storage, transmission, and use and through advancing our understanding of the earth and its climate; targeted investments include the three DOE Bioenergy Research Centers (BRCs), the Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs), two Energy Innovation Hubs, and atmospheric process and climate modeling research.
Table 10. DOE Office of Science Environmental R&D (budget authority in millions of dollars)
Change FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 13-14
Actual
Actual
Estimate
Percent Biological and Environmental Research 384 372 402 8.3%
Climate and Environ Sciences
290
277
308
11.2% Biological Systems Science 94 95 94 -0.4%
Basic Energy Sciences1
54
54
54
0.0% Geosciences Research 21 21 21 0.0%
Energy Biosciences2
33
33
33
0.0% ____ ____ ____
TOTAL
438
425
456
7.2%
Notes:
1. Figures are estimates for FY 2013 and FY 2014
2. Comprised of Photosynthetic Systems and Physical Biosciences.
2.1 Office of Biological and Environmental Research ($402 million)
The mission of the Biological and Environmental Research (BER) program is to support fundamental research and scientific user facilities to achieve a predictive understanding of complex biological, climatic, and environmental systems for a secure and sustainable energy future. Approximately half of the BER budget is included here as environmental R&D.

2.1.1 Climate and Environmental Sciences ($275 million)
The Climate and Environmental Sciences subprogram supports fundamental science and research capabilities that enable major scientific developments in climate-relevant atmospheric- process and ecosystem research and modeling, in support of DOE’s mission goals for basic science, energy, and national security. This includes research on clouds, aerosols, and the terrestrial carbon cycle; large-scale climate change and earth system modeling; the effects of climate change on ecosystems; and integrated analysis of climate change impacts on energy and related infrastructures. It also supports subsurface biogeochemical research that advances fundamental understanding of coupled physical, chemical, and biological processes controlling the environmental fate and transport of energy byproducts.
The subprogram supports three primary research activities and two national scientific user facilities, as shown in Table 11, below. The two user facilities, included under “Facilities and Infrastructure” are:
 the Atmospheric Radiation Measurements Climate Research Facility (ARM)
 the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL).
Table 11. DOE Climate and Environmental Sciences (budget authority in millions of dollars)
Change FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 13-14
Actual
Actual
Estimate
Percent Atmospheric System Research 26 26 26 0.0%
Environmental System Science
68
62
69
10.5% Climate and Earth System Modeling 74 73 74 1.5%
Facilities and Infrastructure
122
115
119
3.6% Small Business Innovation Research/ Small Business Technology Transfer 0 0 19 - -
____
____
____
TOTAL 290 277 308 11.2%
Atmospheric System Research (ASR - $26 million) addresses two major areas of uncertainty in climate change model projections: the role of clouds and the effects of aerosols on precipitation and the atmospheric radiation balance.
ASR coordinates with ARM, utilizing the facility’s continuous long-term datasets that provide three-dimensional measurements of radiation, aerosols, clouds, precipitation, dynamics, and thermodynamics over a range of environmental conditions at diverse climate-sensitive locations. The long-term observational datasets are supplemented with laboratory studies and shorter-duration ground-based and airborne field campaigns.

ASR research results are incorporated into earth system models developed by Climate and Earth System Modeling to both understand the processes that govern atmospheric components and to advance earth system model capabilities with greater certainty of predictions. ASR seeks to develop integrated, scalable test-beds that incorporate process-level understanding of the life cycles of aerosols, clouds, and precipitation into dynamic models.
Environmental System Science ($69 million) supports research to provide a robust, predictive understanding of terrestrial surface and subsurface ecosystems, including the effects of climate change, from the subsurface to the top of the vegetated canopy and from molecular to global scales. This includes understanding the role of ecosystems in climate with an emphasis on carbon cycling and the role of subsurface biogeochemical processes in the fate and transport of carbon, nutrients, radionuclides, and heavy metals.
A significant fraction of the carbon dioxide (CO2) released to the atmosphere during fossil fuel combustion is taken up by terrestrial ecosystems, but the impacts of climatic change on the uptake of CO2 by the terrestrial biosphere remain poorly understood. The significant sensitivity of climate models to terrestrial carbon cycle feedback and the uncertain signs of that feedback make resolving the role of the terrestrial biosphere on the carbon balance a high priority. The research focuses on understanding, observing, and modeling the processes controlling exchange rates of greenhouse gases, evaluating terrestrial source-sink mechanisms, and improving and validating the representation of terrestrial ecosystems in coupled earth system models.
Subsurface biogeochemical research supports integrated research to understand and predict the role that biogeochemical processes play in controlling the cycling and mobility of energy- relevant materials in the subsurface and across key surface-subsurface interfaces.
Research emphasizes the Arctic and tropics Next Generation Ecosystem Experiments (NGEE) and AmeriFlux to improve the representation of the major carbon sinks associated with changing climates. In FY 2015, NGEE Arctic will begin the transition to Phase II of the project, building from three years of field sampling and process modeling at the Barrow site for Phase I and extending to seven additional years of multiple site sampling, multiple site process modeling, and dynamic model integration into regional climate simulations for Phase II. NGEE Tropics continues with investments to carefully connect field and modeling activities. AmeriFlux will emphasize efforts to encourage common practices and protocols across the network. Subsurface biogeochemistry will continue to focus on fundamental processes that control the fate and transport of energy-related materials in the subsurface.
Climate and Earth System Modeling ($74 million) develops physical, chemical, and biological model components, as well as fully coupled earth system models. This research includes the interactions of human and natural earth systems needed to simulate climate variability and change from years to decades to centuries at regional and global scales. The research specifically focuses on quantifying and reducing the uncertainties in earth system models based on more advanced model development, diagnostics, and climate system analysis. Priority model components include the ocean, sea-ice, land-ice, aerosols, atmospheric chemistry, terrestrial carbon cycling, multi-scale dynamical interdependencies, and dynamical cores.

In FY 2015, BER will initiate a major new investment in Climate Model Development and Validation. The focus of the investment will be on restructuring model architecture, exploiting new software engineering and computational upgrades, and incorporating scale-aware physics in all model components. In addition, new DOE modeling activities will be based on modularized components that can act either alone or as a system, thus allowing greater certainty of predictions in a flexible structure. Advanced software and improved algorithms for DOE Climate Modeling will lead to major improvements to earth system model code that is designed to run optimally on next-generation supercomputers with numerous processors.
Work will begin to develop workflows that automate comparison of models with diverse measurements (satellite, ground-based, and radar measurements) to provide analysis platforms, including methods to characterize and bound projection uncertainty.
BER and the National Science Foundation support the Community Earth System Model which is designed by the research community with open access and broad use by climate researchers worldwide. This model provides a critical capacity for regional climate projections, including information on how the frequency of occurrence and intensity of storms, droughts, and heat waves will change as climate evolves.
The Integrated Assessment activities in BER continue to support the development of integrated assessment model components to the DOE Earth System Modeling activities, with a focus on assessing the interdependencies of energy, water, and land sector activities that are coupled to the physical and biogeochemical drivers of climate and earth system change.
Climate and Environmental Facilities and Infrastructure ($116 million) includes two scientific user facilities, climate data management for the climate science community, and general purpose equipment and plant projects for the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE). The two user facilities are:
 The Atmospheric Radiation Measurements Climate Research Facility (ARM) which provides unique, multi-instrumented capabilities for continuous, long-term observations needed to develop and test understanding of the central role of clouds and aerosols on the earth’s climate. ARM is a multi-platform multi-site national scientific user facility, providing the world’s most comprehensive continuous field measurements of climate data. ARM currently consists of four fixed long-term measurement facility sites (one to be closed in late 2014), three mobile facilities, and an airborne research capability.
 The Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) which provides integrated experimental and computational resources needed to understand the physical, chemical, and biological processes that underlie DOE’s energy and environmental mission.
Data sets generated by ARM, other DOE and Federal earth observing activities, and earth system modeling activities, are large. In FY 2015, the BER Data Management effort includes the Climate and Environmental Data Analysis and Visualization activity that focuses on combining ensembles of new generations of adaptive grid high resolution earth system prediction models with interdependent components involving energy and infrastructure sector models, field observations from ARM, the AmeriFlux Network, ongoing and planned NGEE projects, raw data from environmental field experiments, and analytical tools for system diagnostics, validation, and uncertainty quantification.

2.1.2 Biological Systems Science ($89 million)
Systems biology is the multidisciplinary study of the function of entire biological systems rather than individual components. The program focuses on utilizing systems biology approaches to define the functional principles that drive living systems, from microbes and microbial communities to plants and other whole organisms. Activities include (among other activities):
 Genomic Science on the fundamental principles that drive biological systems relevant to energy, climate, and the environment. This includes: (1) the genome-scale functional properties of microbes, plants, and communities; (2) achieving a dynamic, system-level understanding of organism and community functions; and, (3) advancing predictive understanding, manipulation and design of biological systems. Significant here is support for Bioenergy Research Centers which address critical barriers to the production of next-generation biofuels from non-food plant biomass.
 Mesoscale to Molecules explores the terrain between the mesoscale structures within living cells and the molecular effects in biological macromolecules.
 Radiological Sciences supports radionuclide synthesis and imaging research for real-time visualization of dynamic biological processes in energy and environmentally relevant contexts. This activity contributes a scientific foundation for informed decisions regarding remediation of contaminated DOE sites and for determining acceptable levels of human health protection, for both cleanup workers and the public, in the most cost-effective manner.
 Biological Systems Science Facilities and Infrastructure supports facilities and infrastructure related to genomics and structural biology that are widely used by researchers in academia, the national laboratories, and industry. The DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) is the only federally funded major genome sequencing center focused on genome discovery and analysis in plants and microbes for energy and environmental applications.
2.2 Basic Energy Sciences ($51 million)
The mission of the Basic Energy Sciences (BES) program is to support fundamental research to understand, predict, and ultimately control matter and energy at the electronic, atomic, and molecular levels in order to provide the foundations for new energy technologies and to support DOE missions in energy, environment, and national security. Among the program’s activities are:
 Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs) which focus on: the design, discovery, synthesis, and characterization of novel, solid‐state materials that improve the conversion of solar energy and heat into electricity and fuels and that enhance the conversion of electricity to light; the development of the understanding of materials and processes required to enable improved electrical energy storage and to increase materials resistance to corrosion, decay, or failure in extreme conditions of temperature, pressure, radiation, or chemical exposures; and the exploration of emergent phenomena, such as superconductivity, that can optimize energy flow and boost the efficiency of energy transmission.

 Batteries and Energy Storage Hub, established in December 2012, focuses on understanding the fundamental performance limitations for electrochemical energy storage to launch the next generation, beyond lithium‐ion energy storage technologies relevant to both the electric grid and transportation.
• Chemical Transformations-- Design, synthesis, characterization, and optimization of chemical processes that underpin advanced energy technologies, including catalytic production of fuels, nuclear energy, and geological sequestration of carbon dioxide.
• Photochemistry and Biochemistry-- Research on the molecular mechanisms involved in the capture of light energy and its conversion into chemical and electrical energy through biological and chemical pathways.
• DOE Fuels from Sunlight Hub, Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis aims at developing a cost-effective way to produce fuels, as plants do, by combining sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide, and would be a transformational advance in carbon-neutral energy technology. Its long-term objective is to develop and demonstrate a manufacturable solar- fuels generator, made of naturally abundant elements, that will take sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide as inputs, and robustly produce fuel from the sun 10 times more efficiently than typical current crops.
3. Environmental Management R&D ($10 million)
The Office of Environmental Management (EM) program is responsible for the cleanup of millions of gallons of liquid radioactive waste, thousands of tons of spent (used) nuclear fuel and special nuclear material, disposition of large volumes of transuranic and mixed/low-level waste, huge quantities of contaminated soil and water, and deactivation and decommissioning of thousands of excess facilities. This is the largest cleanup program in the world brought about from five decades of nuclear weapons development and production and Government-sponsored nuclear energy research. It involves some of the most dangerous materials known to humankind.

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT

2014 Dept of Energy Environmental R&D Report

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (10)

Similar to 2014 Dept of Energy Environmental R&D Report

Similar to 2014 Dept of Energy Environmental R&D Report (20)

More from Lyle Birkey

More from Lyle Birkey (17)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

2014 Dept of Energy Environmental R&D Report