SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The Math Behind the
March Madness Tournament and
College Football Playoff
Laura Albert McLay
Associate Professor, ISYE
laura@engr.wisc.edu
@lauramclay
@badgerbrackets
http://bracketology.engr.wisc.edu/
Let’s start with the 2 minute
version of my talk
https://www.facebook.com/UWMadison/videos/10154004638653114/
First, of all…
I’m a industrial and systems
engineering professor by day And a bracketologist by night!
I study systems
A system is a set of things—people, cells, vehicles,
basketball teams, or whatever—interconnected in
such a way that they produce their own pattern of
behavior over time.
My discipline is operations research: the science of
making decisions using advanced analytical methods
Our world is becoming increasingly
complex and increasingly connected
Systems matter!
Mathematical models
and systems thinking
help us study systems
and navigate the
complex, interconnected
world we live in.
What do we hope to learn from
probability models like Markov
chains?
• How do we draw conclusions from limited data?
• How can we make data-driven decisions in the
presence of uncertainty?
How I got started in bracketology
In 2014 someone suggested I examine
bracketology in the context of the first
College Football Playoff…
…and so began Badger Bracketology
My objective: forecast which teams
would make the first college football
playoff before the season was over.
Markov chains:
The Little Engine that Could
Markov chains:
A type of math model for understanding how a
system can evolve over time.
Uses: finance, epidemiology, queues, zombies
Markov chains for ranking teams in a nutshell
Each team is a state. A team “votes” for teams that that it loses to
http://sumnous.github.io/blog/2014/07/24/gephi-on-mac/
Graph of 2014
college football season
Simple yet powerful idea
Automatically rate and ranks teams by
taking advantage of the network structure
of the match ups
• Use Markov chains to account for strength of schedule
• Do not need a human in the loop
Simple data requirements:
1. Game outcomes (score differentials),
2. Home/away status
Takes difficulty of future games into account in football playoff
forecasts
• Polls give the ranking right now, only gives insight a playoff held
today
Google PageRank is a Markov model!
Source: google.com
Do you remember Internet searches
before Google?
https://www.wordstream.com/articles/internet-search-engines-history
First, let’s talk about
ranking basketball teams
Transitions
Rutgers 52 @ Wisconsin 72
Wisconsin Rutgers 1 − 𝑊
𝑊
𝑊
1 − 𝑊
How much credit should Wisconsin get for beating Rutgers by
20 at home?
𝑊 = effective wins (fraction of a vote), which help us compute
our Markov chain transition probabilities
Let’s find a data-driven answer!
Given that team 𝑖 beat team 𝑗 by 𝑥 points at home, what is the
probability that 𝑖 is a better team than 𝑗 on a neutral court?
Data: Some teams play twice per season (home  away)
Given that team 𝑖 beat team 𝑗 by 𝑥 points at home, what is the
probability that 𝑖 is a better team than 𝑗 on 𝑗′
𝑠 home court?
𝑟𝑥
𝐻 𝑟𝑥
𝐴 = probability that a team outscores its opponent by 𝑥
points at home 𝐻 (away 𝐴) is better than its opponent on a
neutral 𝑁 site
Developed by Sokol, Kvam, Nemhauser, and Brown at Georgia Tech to rank NCAA men’s basketball teams
https://www2.isye.gatech.edu/~jsokol/lrmc/
What is the probability you win your next
game (on the road) given that you win by 20 at
home?
Logistic regression to the rescue!
Problem 1: must win by 50+ points to get a lot of credit for a win!
Winning/losing close games gives you the same amount of “credit”
Margin of victory 𝑥
Probabilityofwinningontheroadnexttime
Problem 2: We need to get neutral site win probabilities
Logistic regression for
NCAA men’s basketball
• Use log (Point differentials) instead!
• Do not truncate point differentials
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Point differential
Effectivewins
Winning matters
• Average in a pure win/loss model to give more credit for winning the
game
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Point differential
Effectivewins
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Point differential
Effectivewins
Putting it all together
• End up with the red line!
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Point differential
Effectivewins
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Point differential
Effectivewins
Markov chain transition probabilities
Rutgers 52 @ Wisconsin 72 *
Wisconsin Rutgers 1 − 𝑊
𝑊
𝑊
1 − 𝑊
How much credit should Wisconsin get for beating Rutgers by 20 at home?
P(UW beats Rutgers on a neutral court) = 0.6255
𝑊 = 0.6817 effective wins (fraction of a vote)
* Wisconsin 61 @ Rutgers 54 later on 1/28/2017
Transitions
Same idea for the rest of the games…
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Northwestern
Rutgers
Illinois
Current rankings
3/12/2017 Selection Sunday
1 Gonzaga
2 Villanova
3 Kentucky
4 SMU
5 Wichita St
6 Arizona
7 UCLA
8 Duke
9 Cincinnati
10 Oregon
11 MTSU
12 North Carolina
13 St Marys CA
14 West Virginia
15 Kansas
16 Nevada
17 Purdue
18 Vermont
19 UNC Wilmington
20 Michigan
21 Florida St
22 VA Commonwealth
23 Notre Dame
24 Bucknell
25 Wisconsin
The B1G, ranked.
3/12/2017
17 Purdue
20 Michigan
25 Wisconsin
41 Northwestern
43 Minnesota
54 Maryland
78 Indiana
87 Michigan St
121 Iowa
130 Illinois
141 Ohio St
176 Penn St
187 Rutgers
242 Nebraska
How did we do last year?
3/13/2016 Selection Sunday
1. North Carolina
2. Kansas
3. Villanova
4. Michigan St
5. Virginia
6. West Virginia
7. Oklahoma
8. Kentucky
9. Oregon
10. Purdue
11. Xavier
12. Miami FL
13. Duke
14. Utah
15. Texas A&M
16. Louisville
17. Maryland
18. Arizona
19. Seton Hall
20. Iowa St
21. Indiana
22. California
23. Baylor
24. St Josephs PA
25. Iowa
Now let’s talk about the
College Football Playoff
College Football Playoff
Objective: determine which teams would make the first
college football playoff.
Goal: to forecast the top 4 teams weeks before the season
ends.
Solution method: a ranking method.
Challenge: need to simulate the remainder of the season and
rank the teams at the end of the (simulated) season.
Giant assumption
• We assume the selection committee will pick the four
ranked teams in the playoff.
• History suggests that humans prefer the most deserving
teams rather than the best teams in the national
championship game.
• E.g., 2013 Alabama lost on
a fluke play.
• …but the College Football
Selection Committee might
have changed this!
2013 BCS Rankings just before bowl bids
College football playoff
committee rankings
2014 Playoff rankings 2015 Playoff rankings
How we did last year
2016 Playoff Rankings Badger Bracketology rankings
1 Alabama
2 Ohio State
3 Clemson
3 Washington
5 Michigan
6 Penn State
7 Western Michigan
8 Louisville
9 Oklahoma
10 Wisconsin :(
Model: two parts
0. Observe a few (7-8) weeks of game outcomes
1. Ranking.
• Assign a rating to each team to rank the teams.
• Similar to what we had before but with college football data
2. Game simulation.
• Determine who wins a game based on the team ratings.
Simulate the next week’s game outcomes.
• Combine these:
• Re-rate and re-rank after each week of games.
• Simulate the remainder of the season.
• Report teams most likely to be in the top 4
Score differentials
Yes, running up the score matters, mathematically.
Histogram of score differentials, 2012-2014
Home score - away score
Frequency
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
050100150200
Capped score differentials
38% of conference games fall beyond the cap
Histogram of score differentials capped at +/-21, 2012-2014
Home score - away score
Frequency
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
050100150200250
Note: Rating systems used by College Football Playoff committee must use wins/losses
only (not score differentials). Running up the score makes a difference!
-20 -10 0 10 20
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Point differential
Effectivewins
Sx
H
rx
H
rx
N
Build the Markov chain for football
• Used 3 seasons of data (truncate scores by +/-21)
• Use games played in consecutive years to identify win
probabilities to feed into the Markov chain
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
logistic regression
logistic regression averaged with win (weight = 2/3)
logistic regression averaged with win (weight = 1/3)
Modified Log Logistic Regression
Markov Chain (ln(mLRMC))
• Same as mLRMC except that we consider log point differentials to
dampen big score differentials
• Do not truncate point differentials
-20 -10 0 10 20
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Point differential
Effectivewins
logistic regression (home team)
logistic regression averaged with win
Markov chain transitions
Use mLRMC and ln(mLRMC) for all games
Simulate the rest of the season!
0. Observe a few (7-8) weeks of game outcomes
1. Ranking.
• Assign a rating to each team to rank the teams.
2. Game simulation.
• Determine who wins a game based on the team ratings.
Simulate the next week’s game outcomes.
• Combine these:
• Re-rate and re-rank after each week of games.
• Simulate the remainder of the season.
• Report teams most likely to be in the top 4
Win probability parameters
The win probability between teams 𝑖 and 𝑗, where 𝑖 is the home
team is captured by the best-fit logistic regression model using
two years of game data:
𝑝𝑖𝑗 =
𝑒 𝑏+𝑎(𝑟 𝑖−𝑟 𝑗)
1 + 𝑒 𝑏+𝑎(𝑟 𝑖−𝑟 𝑗)
where
𝑟𝑖 − 𝑟𝑗 = the difference in ratings between the two teams.
and assign a point differential to the winner.
Game prediction accuracy (averaged per game)
Statistic Model Training set Test set
Mean Absolute Error mLRMC 0.2043 0.3152
ln(mLRMC) 0.2026 0.3162
Mean Squared Error mLRMC 0.1006 0.1885
ln(mLRMC) 0.0999 0.1897
College football playoff
committee rankings
2016 Playoff rankings2015 Playoff rankings
2016 Results: Rankings (NOW)
Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Alabama CFP Committee 1 1 1 1 1 1
ln(mLRMC) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clemson CFP Committee 2 2 4 4 3 2
ln(mLRMC) 3 4 3 3 5 4 4 3
OSU CFP Committee 6 5 2 2 2 3
ln(mLRMC) 4 5 5 4 3 3 2 2
Washington CFP Committee 5 4 6 5 4 4
ln(mLRMC) 8 7 6 6 6 6 5 3*
* Clemson and Washington were tied
2016 Results: Rankings
Forecasted ranking of likelihood to make playoff (any seed, out
of 1000)
Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Alabama
ln(mLRMC)
Forecasted
ranking 1 1 1 1 1 1 NA
ln(mLRMC)
now ranking 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clemson
ln(mLRMC)
Forecasted
ranking 2 2 2 2 2 3 NA
ln(mLRMC)
now ranking 3 4 3 3 5 4 4 3
OSU
ln(mLRMC)
Forecasted
ranking 5 5 5 4 5 2 NA
ln(mLRMC)
now ranking 4 5 5 4 3 3 2 2
Washington
ln(mLRMC)
Forecasted
ranking 3 4 4 6 4 4 NA
ln(mLRMC)
now ranking 8 7 6 6 6 6 5 3*
* Clemson and Washington were tied
2015 Results: Rankings (NOW)
Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Clemson CFP Committee 1 1 1 1 1 1
mLRMC 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 2
ln(mLRMC) 7 5 1 1 2 1 1 2
Alabama CFP Committee 4 2 2 2 2 2
mLRMC 4 5 8 3 1 2 1 1
ln(mLRMC) 5 4 6 2 1 2 2 1
MSU CFP Committee 7 13 9 5 5 3
mLRMC 6 4 5 9 9 5 5 3
ln(mLRMC) 6 2 4 7 8 4 4 3
Oklahoma CFP Committee 15 12 7 3 3 4
mLRMC 16 13 13 8 5 3 1 4
ln(mLRMC) 18 12 16 10 5 5 3 4
Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13
Clemson mLRMC 667 897 931 905 915 949 956
ln(mLRMC) 749 840 897 893 955 923 976
Alabama mLRMC 361 209 166 837 913 943 995
ln(mLRMC) 427 240 197 858 847 931 996
MSU mLRMC 179 213 261 54 24 569 675
ln(mLRMC) 226 349 354 115 162 573 706
Oklahoma mLRMC 20 46 71 119 393 758 1000
ln(mLRMC) 12 73 16 63 142 247 1000
2015 Results:
Forecasted number of times to make playoff
(out of 1000)
Nebraska
beats
MSU
MSU
beats
The OSU
No Big12
championship
Slight difference in
rankings:
3rd /4th vs. 5th /6th
2015 Results:
Forecasted ranking of likelihood to make
playoff (any seed, out of 1000)
Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Clemson mLRMC 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 2
ln(mLRMC) 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 2
Alabama mLRMC 5 7 6 2 2 2 2 1
ln(mLRMC) 4 6 8 2 1 1 2 1
MSU mLRMC 7 6 7 11 10 4 4 3
ln(mLRMC) 6 5 5 9 6 3 4 3
Oklahoma mLRMC 18 13 13 9 4 3 1 4
ln(mLRMC) 21 15 14 12 8 6 1 4
No Big12
championship
No simulation:
the season is
over. We think
the committee
got it right!
Ranked 2nd & 7th
after week 7
Ranked 5th & 4th
after week 9
2015 Results:
What happened to The Ohio State University?
Rankings after week 12
Forecasted rankings after
week 12
1. Clemson 1. Clemson
2. Alabama 2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma 3. Oklahoma
4. Notre Dame 4. Michigan State
5. Michigan State 5. Iowa
6. Ohio State 6. Notre Dame
7. Iowa 7. Stanford
8. Florida 8. Florida
9. Michigan 9. Ohio State
10. Stanford
(no other teams have >1%
chance of making the playoff)
Final thoughts about March Madness
Picking the perfect bracket
There are about 9.2 quintillion ways to fill out a bracket…
And 1 way to fill out a perfect bracket
The odds of filling out a perfect bracket are not 9-
quintillion-to-1 because:
(a) the tournament isn’t like the lottery where every
outcome is equally likely, and
(b) monkeys are not randomly selecting game outcomes.
Instead, people are purposefully selecting outcomes.
Can math help our odds?
FiveThirtyEight notes that the typical bracket has a
2.5 trillion-to-1 odds of being perfect:
• https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/march-madness-
perfect-bracket-odds/
BracketOdds at Illinois estimates that a historical
average winning bracket performs at 4.4 billion-to-1
• Warren Buffet may have to pay out!
The thing with perfect brackets
They depend on the year.
Let’s only look at how many people correctly select all Final Four teams:
– 1140 of 13 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2016
– 182,709 of 11.57 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams
in 2015 *
– 612 of 11 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2014
– 47 of 8.15 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2013
– 23,304 of 6.45 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams
in 2012
– 2 of 5.9 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2011
* Only 1 bracket emerged from the round of 64 with all 32 correct picks
Tips for winning your office pool
1. Don’t use RPI
• Badger Bracketology (my favorite tool!)
• Logistic Regression Markov Chain (LRMC)
• FiveThirtyEight rankings of tournament teams
• Ken Pomoroy’s rankings
• Sagarin rankings
• Massey Ratings
• ESPN’s BPI rankings
Rankings clearinghouse: http://www.masseyratings.com/cb/compare.htm
2. Pay attention to the seeds
Some seeds generate more upsets than others
• 7-10 seeds and 5/12 seeds
Historically, 6/11 seeds go the longest before facing a
1 or 2 seed.
3. Don’t pick Kansas
• Be strategic. The point is NOT to maximize your
points, it’s to get more points than your opponents
• Differentiate your Final Four
• Check ESPN for the top picked teams. Some top teams
are overvalued and others are undervalued
• Last year:
• Kansas was selected as the overall winner in 27% of brackets
(and in 62% of Final Fours) with a 19% chance of winning (538)
• UNC selected as overall winner in 8% of brackets (with a 15%
win probability) and Villanova in 5.5%
http://games.espn.com/tournament-challenge-bracket/2016/en/whopickedwhom
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-march-madness-predictions/
4. It’s totally random
A good process yields good outcomes on average
• It does not guarantee the best outcome in any given
tournament
Small pools are better if you have a good process
• Scoring can be random
• The more brackets, the higher chance that a “random”
bracket will be the best
Topics in Sports Analytics
ISYE 601 in Spring 2017!
• Goal: teach students data-driven methods for making
better decisions using sports as a vehicle
• Course topics:
• Linear regression
• Logistic regression
• Empirical Bayes
• Ranking methods
• Probability models and Markov chains
• Forecasting
• Game theory
• Tournament scheduling
• Networks (is my team mathematically eliminated from the
playoffs?)
…and more!
In the news!
56https://punkrockor.com/in-the-news/
Thank you!
Laura Albert McLay
laura@engr.wisc.edu
punkrockOR.com
bracketology.engr.wisc.edu
Twitter: @lauramclay, @badgerbrackets

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Sacramentos slides
Sacramentos   slidesSacramentos   slides
Sacramentos slides
Alexandre Alves
 
Analisis neuropsicologico de_los_problemas_en_el_a
Analisis neuropsicologico de_los_problemas_en_el_aAnalisis neuropsicologico de_los_problemas_en_el_a
Analisis neuropsicologico de_los_problemas_en_el_a
Marcela Ramos
 
Презентация вчителя початкових класів Пархоменко Л.В.
Презентация вчителя початкових класів Пархоменко Л.В.Презентация вчителя початкових класів Пархоменко Л.В.
Презентация вчителя початкових класів Пархоменко Л.В.
Npanova
 
Felinos
FelinosFelinos
Buat ujian kompetensi
Buat ujian kompetensiBuat ujian kompetensi
Buat ujian kompetensi
Andi Sugandi
 
Faites vos ventes en ligne - Sud Vendée Tourisme
Faites vos ventes en ligne - Sud Vendée TourismeFaites vos ventes en ligne - Sud Vendée Tourisme
Faites vos ventes en ligne - Sud Vendée Tourisme
Sud Vendée Tourisme
 
Animales domesticos y de granaja
Animales domesticos y de granajaAnimales domesticos y de granaja
Animales domesticos y de granaja
Manuelatorresp
 
PPT Akidah Ahlak MA
PPT Akidah Ahlak MAPPT Akidah Ahlak MA
PPT Akidah Ahlak MA
Fitri Nofiati
 
Rpp akidah akhlak MA x
Rpp akidah akhlak MA x Rpp akidah akhlak MA x
Rpp akidah akhlak MA x
Fitri Nofiati
 
Expo gestion de proyectos
Expo gestion de proyectosExpo gestion de proyectos
Expo gestion de proyectos
Fabiola Malavé
 
Talent Grids - Empowering Companies, Campuses and Talent
Talent Grids - Empowering Companies, Campuses and TalentTalent Grids - Empowering Companies, Campuses and Talent
Talent Grids - Empowering Companies, Campuses and Talent
Anne Thomas
 
Colon specific drug delivery system approaches and application
Colon specific drug delivery system approaches and applicationColon specific drug delivery system approaches and application
Colon specific drug delivery system approaches and application
Tukaram Patil
 
Webséminaire 365 jours en association
Webséminaire 365 jours en associationWebséminaire 365 jours en association
Webséminaire 365 jours en association
MONA
 
Marketing management
Marketing managementMarketing management
Marketing management
ARS Talent Academy
 
Safari fotográfico
Safari fotográficoSafari fotográfico
Safari fotográfico
ser-pertenecer
 
Women in engineering luncheon presentation at CASE 2013 (IEEE conference on a...
Women in engineering luncheon presentation at CASE 2013 (IEEE conference on a...Women in engineering luncheon presentation at CASE 2013 (IEEE conference on a...
Women in engineering luncheon presentation at CASE 2013 (IEEE conference on a...
Laura Albert
 
engineering systems: critical infrastructure and logistics
engineering systems: critical infrastructure and logisticsengineering systems: critical infrastructure and logistics
engineering systems: critical infrastructure and logistics
Laura Albert
 
Should a football team run or pass? A linear programming approach to game theory
Should a football team run or pass? A linear programming approach to game theoryShould a football team run or pass? A linear programming approach to game theory
Should a football team run or pass? A linear programming approach to game theory
Laura Albert
 
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Arthur Charpentier
 
Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2
Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2
Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2
Arthur Charpentier
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Sacramentos slides
Sacramentos   slidesSacramentos   slides
Sacramentos slides
 
Analisis neuropsicologico de_los_problemas_en_el_a
Analisis neuropsicologico de_los_problemas_en_el_aAnalisis neuropsicologico de_los_problemas_en_el_a
Analisis neuropsicologico de_los_problemas_en_el_a
 
Презентация вчителя початкових класів Пархоменко Л.В.
Презентация вчителя початкових класів Пархоменко Л.В.Презентация вчителя початкових класів Пархоменко Л.В.
Презентация вчителя початкових класів Пархоменко Л.В.
 
Felinos
FelinosFelinos
Felinos
 
Buat ujian kompetensi
Buat ujian kompetensiBuat ujian kompetensi
Buat ujian kompetensi
 
Faites vos ventes en ligne - Sud Vendée Tourisme
Faites vos ventes en ligne - Sud Vendée TourismeFaites vos ventes en ligne - Sud Vendée Tourisme
Faites vos ventes en ligne - Sud Vendée Tourisme
 
Animales domesticos y de granaja
Animales domesticos y de granajaAnimales domesticos y de granaja
Animales domesticos y de granaja
 
PPT Akidah Ahlak MA
PPT Akidah Ahlak MAPPT Akidah Ahlak MA
PPT Akidah Ahlak MA
 
Rpp akidah akhlak MA x
Rpp akidah akhlak MA x Rpp akidah akhlak MA x
Rpp akidah akhlak MA x
 
Expo gestion de proyectos
Expo gestion de proyectosExpo gestion de proyectos
Expo gestion de proyectos
 
Talent Grids - Empowering Companies, Campuses and Talent
Talent Grids - Empowering Companies, Campuses and TalentTalent Grids - Empowering Companies, Campuses and Talent
Talent Grids - Empowering Companies, Campuses and Talent
 
Colon specific drug delivery system approaches and application
Colon specific drug delivery system approaches and applicationColon specific drug delivery system approaches and application
Colon specific drug delivery system approaches and application
 
Webséminaire 365 jours en association
Webséminaire 365 jours en associationWebséminaire 365 jours en association
Webséminaire 365 jours en association
 
Marketing management
Marketing managementMarketing management
Marketing management
 
Safari fotográfico
Safari fotográficoSafari fotográfico
Safari fotográfico
 
Women in engineering luncheon presentation at CASE 2013 (IEEE conference on a...
Women in engineering luncheon presentation at CASE 2013 (IEEE conference on a...Women in engineering luncheon presentation at CASE 2013 (IEEE conference on a...
Women in engineering luncheon presentation at CASE 2013 (IEEE conference on a...
 
engineering systems: critical infrastructure and logistics
engineering systems: critical infrastructure and logisticsengineering systems: critical infrastructure and logistics
engineering systems: critical infrastructure and logistics
 
Should a football team run or pass? A linear programming approach to game theory
Should a football team run or pass? A linear programming approach to game theoryShould a football team run or pass? A linear programming approach to game theory
Should a football team run or pass? A linear programming approach to game theory
 
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
 
Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2
Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2
Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2
 

Similar to Bracketology talk at the Crossroads of ideas

Monte carlo simulation for floorball results
Monte carlo simulation for floorball resultsMonte carlo simulation for floorball results
Monte carlo simulation for floorball results
Miikka Kataja
 
Amy Langville, Professor of Mathematics, The College of Charleston in South C...
Amy Langville, Professor of Mathematics, The College of Charleston in South C...Amy Langville, Professor of Mathematics, The College of Charleston in South C...
Amy Langville, Professor of Mathematics, The College of Charleston in South C...
MLconf
 
Lecture9.ppt
Lecture9.pptLecture9.ppt
Lecture9.ppt
ubaidullah75790
 
April Madness
April MadnessApril Madness
April Madness
Raunak Mundada
 
ShootingStars_Powerpoint for march madness
ShootingStars_Powerpoint for march madnessShootingStars_Powerpoint for march madness
ShootingStars_Powerpoint for march madness
Pritha Sinha
 
2016 Sport Analysis for March Madness
2016 Sport Analysis for March Madness2016 Sport Analysis for March Madness
2016 Sport Analysis for March Madness
Nan Wang
 
Do lower-seeded teams really play with an "underdog" mentality?
Do lower-seeded teams really play with an "underdog" mentality?Do lower-seeded teams really play with an "underdog" mentality?
Do lower-seeded teams really play with an "underdog" mentality?
Kymee Noll
 
Honors Research Colloquium Final Paper
Honors Research Colloquium Final PaperHonors Research Colloquium Final Paper
Honors Research Colloquium Final Paper
Mark Edwards
 
Honors Research Colloquium Final Poster
Honors Research Colloquium Final PosterHonors Research Colloquium Final Poster
Honors Research Colloquium Final Poster
Mark Edwards
 
March Madness WebQuest
March Madness WebQuestMarch Madness WebQuest
March Madness WebQuest
Corey Phillips
 
m503 Project1 FINAL DRAFT
m503 Project1 FINAL DRAFTm503 Project1 FINAL DRAFT
m503 Project1 FINAL DRAFT
Brian Becker
 
Winning in Sports with Networks
Winning in Sports with NetworksWinning in Sports with Networks
Winning in Sports with Networks
Konstantinos Pelechrinis
 
NBA playoff prediction Model.pptx
NBA playoff prediction Model.pptxNBA playoff prediction Model.pptx
NBA playoff prediction Model.pptx
rishikeshravi30
 
March Madness Probabilities
March Madness ProbabilitiesMarch Madness Probabilities
March Madness Probabilities
Liana Valentino
 
College football solution
College football solutionCollege football solution
College football solution
Greg Eyink
 
Loras College 2014 Business Analytics Symposium | Dan Conway: Sports Analytics
Loras College 2014 Business Analytics Symposium | Dan Conway: Sports AnalyticsLoras College 2014 Business Analytics Symposium | Dan Conway: Sports Analytics
Loras College 2014 Business Analytics Symposium | Dan Conway: Sports Analytics
Cartegraph
 
Systems Thinking with the Ball Point Game - A&B 2019
Systems Thinking with the Ball Point Game - A&B 2019Systems Thinking with the Ball Point Game - A&B 2019
Systems Thinking with the Ball Point Game - A&B 2019
Jeff Kosciejew
 
Demo_NextMatch
Demo_NextMatchDemo_NextMatch
Demo_NextMatch
Yuwei Liu
 
Aleksey Rehlov, Creative Mobile OÜ
Aleksey Rehlov, Creative Mobile OÜAleksey Rehlov, Creative Mobile OÜ
Aleksey Rehlov, Creative Mobile OÜ
White Nights Conference
 
2012 Basketball Championship Manual
2012 Basketball Championship Manual2012 Basketball Championship Manual
2012 Basketball Championship Manual
Jason Grohoske
 

Similar to Bracketology talk at the Crossroads of ideas (20)

Monte carlo simulation for floorball results
Monte carlo simulation for floorball resultsMonte carlo simulation for floorball results
Monte carlo simulation for floorball results
 
Amy Langville, Professor of Mathematics, The College of Charleston in South C...
Amy Langville, Professor of Mathematics, The College of Charleston in South C...Amy Langville, Professor of Mathematics, The College of Charleston in South C...
Amy Langville, Professor of Mathematics, The College of Charleston in South C...
 
Lecture9.ppt
Lecture9.pptLecture9.ppt
Lecture9.ppt
 
April Madness
April MadnessApril Madness
April Madness
 
ShootingStars_Powerpoint for march madness
ShootingStars_Powerpoint for march madnessShootingStars_Powerpoint for march madness
ShootingStars_Powerpoint for march madness
 
2016 Sport Analysis for March Madness
2016 Sport Analysis for March Madness2016 Sport Analysis for March Madness
2016 Sport Analysis for March Madness
 
Do lower-seeded teams really play with an "underdog" mentality?
Do lower-seeded teams really play with an "underdog" mentality?Do lower-seeded teams really play with an "underdog" mentality?
Do lower-seeded teams really play with an "underdog" mentality?
 
Honors Research Colloquium Final Paper
Honors Research Colloquium Final PaperHonors Research Colloquium Final Paper
Honors Research Colloquium Final Paper
 
Honors Research Colloquium Final Poster
Honors Research Colloquium Final PosterHonors Research Colloquium Final Poster
Honors Research Colloquium Final Poster
 
March Madness WebQuest
March Madness WebQuestMarch Madness WebQuest
March Madness WebQuest
 
m503 Project1 FINAL DRAFT
m503 Project1 FINAL DRAFTm503 Project1 FINAL DRAFT
m503 Project1 FINAL DRAFT
 
Winning in Sports with Networks
Winning in Sports with NetworksWinning in Sports with Networks
Winning in Sports with Networks
 
NBA playoff prediction Model.pptx
NBA playoff prediction Model.pptxNBA playoff prediction Model.pptx
NBA playoff prediction Model.pptx
 
March Madness Probabilities
March Madness ProbabilitiesMarch Madness Probabilities
March Madness Probabilities
 
College football solution
College football solutionCollege football solution
College football solution
 
Loras College 2014 Business Analytics Symposium | Dan Conway: Sports Analytics
Loras College 2014 Business Analytics Symposium | Dan Conway: Sports AnalyticsLoras College 2014 Business Analytics Symposium | Dan Conway: Sports Analytics
Loras College 2014 Business Analytics Symposium | Dan Conway: Sports Analytics
 
Systems Thinking with the Ball Point Game - A&B 2019
Systems Thinking with the Ball Point Game - A&B 2019Systems Thinking with the Ball Point Game - A&B 2019
Systems Thinking with the Ball Point Game - A&B 2019
 
Demo_NextMatch
Demo_NextMatchDemo_NextMatch
Demo_NextMatch
 
Aleksey Rehlov, Creative Mobile OÜ
Aleksey Rehlov, Creative Mobile OÜAleksey Rehlov, Creative Mobile OÜ
Aleksey Rehlov, Creative Mobile OÜ
 
2012 Basketball Championship Manual
2012 Basketball Championship Manual2012 Basketball Championship Manual
2012 Basketball Championship Manual
 

More from Laura Albert

Optimization with impact: my journey in public sector operations research
Optimization with impact: my journey in public sector operations research Optimization with impact: my journey in public sector operations research
Optimization with impact: my journey in public sector operations research
Laura Albert
 
Should a football team go for a one or two point conversion? A dynamic progra...
Should a football team go for a one or two point conversion? A dynamic progra...Should a football team go for a one or two point conversion? A dynamic progra...
Should a football team go for a one or two point conversion? A dynamic progra...
Laura Albert
 
On designing public sector systems in emergency medical services, disaster re...
On designing public sector systems in emergency medical services, disaster re...On designing public sector systems in emergency medical services, disaster re...
On designing public sector systems in emergency medical services, disaster re...
Laura Albert
 
Volleyball analytics: Modeling volleyball using Markov chains
Volleyball analytics: Modeling volleyball using Markov chainsVolleyball analytics: Modeling volleyball using Markov chains
Volleyball analytics: Modeling volleyball using Markov chains
Laura Albert
 
2018 INFORMS Government & Analytics Summit Overview
2018 INFORMS Government & Analytics Summit Overview2018 INFORMS Government & Analytics Summit Overview
2018 INFORMS Government & Analytics Summit Overview
Laura Albert
 
Designing emergency medical service systems to enhance community resilience
Designing emergency medical service systems to enhance community resilience Designing emergency medical service systems to enhance community resilience
Designing emergency medical service systems to enhance community resilience
Laura Albert
 
Modeling Service networks
Modeling Service networksModeling Service networks
Modeling Service networks
Laura Albert
 
Translating Engineering and Operations Analyses into Effective Homeland Secur...
Translating Engineering and Operations Analyses into Effective Homeland Secur...Translating Engineering and Operations Analyses into Effective Homeland Secur...
Translating Engineering and Operations Analyses into Effective Homeland Secur...
Laura Albert
 
Delivering emergency medical services:Research, theory, and application
Delivering emergency medical services:Research, theory, and applicationDelivering emergency medical services:Research, theory, and application
Delivering emergency medical services:Research, theory, and application
Laura Albert
 
Advanced analytics for supporting public policy, bracketology, and beyond!
Advanced analytics for supporting public policy, bracketology, and beyond!Advanced analytics for supporting public policy, bracketology, and beyond!
Advanced analytics for supporting public policy, bracketology, and beyond!
Laura Albert
 
2015 Fuzzy Vance Lecture in Mathematics at Oberlin College: Locating and disp...
2015 Fuzzy Vance Lecture in Mathematics at Oberlin College: Locating and disp...2015 Fuzzy Vance Lecture in Mathematics at Oberlin College: Locating and disp...
2015 Fuzzy Vance Lecture in Mathematics at Oberlin College: Locating and disp...
Laura Albert
 
Screening Commercial Aviation Passengers in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001
Screening Commercial Aviation Passengers in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001Screening Commercial Aviation Passengers in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001
Screening Commercial Aviation Passengers in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001
Laura Albert
 
Delivering emergency medical services: research, application, and outreach
Delivering emergency medical services: research, application, and outreachDelivering emergency medical services: research, application, and outreach
Delivering emergency medical services: research, application, and outreach
Laura Albert
 
Technical writing tips
Technical writing tipsTechnical writing tips
Technical writing tips
Laura Albert
 

More from Laura Albert (14)

Optimization with impact: my journey in public sector operations research
Optimization with impact: my journey in public sector operations research Optimization with impact: my journey in public sector operations research
Optimization with impact: my journey in public sector operations research
 
Should a football team go for a one or two point conversion? A dynamic progra...
Should a football team go for a one or two point conversion? A dynamic progra...Should a football team go for a one or two point conversion? A dynamic progra...
Should a football team go for a one or two point conversion? A dynamic progra...
 
On designing public sector systems in emergency medical services, disaster re...
On designing public sector systems in emergency medical services, disaster re...On designing public sector systems in emergency medical services, disaster re...
On designing public sector systems in emergency medical services, disaster re...
 
Volleyball analytics: Modeling volleyball using Markov chains
Volleyball analytics: Modeling volleyball using Markov chainsVolleyball analytics: Modeling volleyball using Markov chains
Volleyball analytics: Modeling volleyball using Markov chains
 
2018 INFORMS Government & Analytics Summit Overview
2018 INFORMS Government & Analytics Summit Overview2018 INFORMS Government & Analytics Summit Overview
2018 INFORMS Government & Analytics Summit Overview
 
Designing emergency medical service systems to enhance community resilience
Designing emergency medical service systems to enhance community resilience Designing emergency medical service systems to enhance community resilience
Designing emergency medical service systems to enhance community resilience
 
Modeling Service networks
Modeling Service networksModeling Service networks
Modeling Service networks
 
Translating Engineering and Operations Analyses into Effective Homeland Secur...
Translating Engineering and Operations Analyses into Effective Homeland Secur...Translating Engineering and Operations Analyses into Effective Homeland Secur...
Translating Engineering and Operations Analyses into Effective Homeland Secur...
 
Delivering emergency medical services:Research, theory, and application
Delivering emergency medical services:Research, theory, and applicationDelivering emergency medical services:Research, theory, and application
Delivering emergency medical services:Research, theory, and application
 
Advanced analytics for supporting public policy, bracketology, and beyond!
Advanced analytics for supporting public policy, bracketology, and beyond!Advanced analytics for supporting public policy, bracketology, and beyond!
Advanced analytics for supporting public policy, bracketology, and beyond!
 
2015 Fuzzy Vance Lecture in Mathematics at Oberlin College: Locating and disp...
2015 Fuzzy Vance Lecture in Mathematics at Oberlin College: Locating and disp...2015 Fuzzy Vance Lecture in Mathematics at Oberlin College: Locating and disp...
2015 Fuzzy Vance Lecture in Mathematics at Oberlin College: Locating and disp...
 
Screening Commercial Aviation Passengers in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001
Screening Commercial Aviation Passengers in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001Screening Commercial Aviation Passengers in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001
Screening Commercial Aviation Passengers in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001
 
Delivering emergency medical services: research, application, and outreach
Delivering emergency medical services: research, application, and outreachDelivering emergency medical services: research, application, and outreach
Delivering emergency medical services: research, application, and outreach
 
Technical writing tips
Technical writing tipsTechnical writing tips
Technical writing tips
 

Recently uploaded

Belgium vs Romania Injuries and Patience in Belgium’s Euro Cup Germany Squad....
Belgium vs Romania Injuries and Patience in Belgium’s Euro Cup Germany Squad....Belgium vs Romania Injuries and Patience in Belgium’s Euro Cup Germany Squad....
Belgium vs Romania Injuries and Patience in Belgium’s Euro Cup Germany Squad....
Eticketing.co
 
CAA Region II Day 1 Morning Result Accra event
CAA Region II Day 1 Morning Result Accra eventCAA Region II Day 1 Morning Result Accra event
CAA Region II Day 1 Morning Result Accra event
Kweku Zurek
 
Georgia vs Portugal Georgia UEFA Euro 2024 Squad Khvicha Kvaratskhelia Leads ...
Georgia vs Portugal Georgia UEFA Euro 2024 Squad Khvicha Kvaratskhelia Leads ...Georgia vs Portugal Georgia UEFA Euro 2024 Squad Khvicha Kvaratskhelia Leads ...
Georgia vs Portugal Georgia UEFA Euro 2024 Squad Khvicha Kvaratskhelia Leads ...
Eticketing.co
 
MESH IPL 2024 REport_Wavemaker India.pdf
MESH IPL 2024 REport_Wavemaker India.pdfMESH IPL 2024 REport_Wavemaker India.pdf
MESH IPL 2024 REport_Wavemaker India.pdf
Social Samosa
 
Boletin de la I Copa Panamericana de Voleibol Femenino U17 Guatemala 2024
Boletin de la I Copa Panamericana de Voleibol Femenino U17 Guatemala 2024Boletin de la I Copa Panamericana de Voleibol Femenino U17 Guatemala 2024
Boletin de la I Copa Panamericana de Voleibol Femenino U17 Guatemala 2024
Judith Chuquipul
 
Italy vs Albania Soul and sacrifice' are the keys to success for Albania at E...
Italy vs Albania Soul and sacrifice' are the keys to success for Albania at E...Italy vs Albania Soul and sacrifice' are the keys to success for Albania at E...
Italy vs Albania Soul and sacrifice' are the keys to success for Albania at E...
Eticketing.co
 
Switzerland vs Germany At UEFA Euro 2024 the Full squad, preview, match sched...
Switzerland vs Germany At UEFA Euro 2024 the Full squad, preview, match sched...Switzerland vs Germany At UEFA Euro 2024 the Full squad, preview, match sched...
Switzerland vs Germany At UEFA Euro 2024 the Full squad, preview, match sched...
Eticketing.co
 
Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...
Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...
Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...
Eticketing.co
 
Hesan Soufi's Legacy: Inspiring the Next Generation
Hesan Soufi's Legacy: Inspiring the Next GenerationHesan Soufi's Legacy: Inspiring the Next Generation
Hesan Soufi's Legacy: Inspiring the Next Generation
Hesan Soufi 
 
Luciano Spalletti Leads Italy's Transition at UEFA Euro 2024.docx
Luciano Spalletti Leads Italy's Transition at UEFA Euro 2024.docxLuciano Spalletti Leads Italy's Transition at UEFA Euro 2024.docx
Luciano Spalletti Leads Italy's Transition at UEFA Euro 2024.docx
Euro Cup 2024 Tickets
 
Match By Match Detailed Schedule Of The ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024.pdf
Match By Match Detailed Schedule Of The ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024.pdfMatch By Match Detailed Schedule Of The ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024.pdf
Match By Match Detailed Schedule Of The ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024.pdf
mouthhunt5
 
Netherlands vs Austria Netherlands Face Familiar Foes in Euro Cup Germany Gro...
Netherlands vs Austria Netherlands Face Familiar Foes in Euro Cup Germany Gro...Netherlands vs Austria Netherlands Face Familiar Foes in Euro Cup Germany Gro...
Netherlands vs Austria Netherlands Face Familiar Foes in Euro Cup Germany Gro...
Eticketing.co
 
Spain vs Croatia Spain aims to put aside the RFEF crisis as they chase Euro C...
Spain vs Croatia Spain aims to put aside the RFEF crisis as they chase Euro C...Spain vs Croatia Spain aims to put aside the RFEF crisis as they chase Euro C...
Spain vs Croatia Spain aims to put aside the RFEF crisis as they chase Euro C...
Eticketing.co
 
Belgium vs Slovakia Belgium Euro 2024 Golden Generation Faces Euro Cup Final ...
Belgium vs Slovakia Belgium Euro 2024 Golden Generation Faces Euro Cup Final ...Belgium vs Slovakia Belgium Euro 2024 Golden Generation Faces Euro Cup Final ...
Belgium vs Slovakia Belgium Euro 2024 Golden Generation Faces Euro Cup Final ...
Eticketing.co
 
Psaroudakis: Family and Football – The Psaroudakis Success Story
Psaroudakis: Family and Football – The Psaroudakis Success StoryPsaroudakis: Family and Football – The Psaroudakis Success Story
Psaroudakis: Family and Football – The Psaroudakis Success Story
Psaroudakis
 
Belgium vs Romania Ultimate Guide to Euro Cup 2024 Tactics, Ticketing, and Qu...
Belgium vs Romania Ultimate Guide to Euro Cup 2024 Tactics, Ticketing, and Qu...Belgium vs Romania Ultimate Guide to Euro Cup 2024 Tactics, Ticketing, and Qu...
Belgium vs Romania Ultimate Guide to Euro Cup 2024 Tactics, Ticketing, and Qu...
Eticketing.co
 
Tennis rules and techniques with information
Tennis rules and techniques with informationTennis rules and techniques with information
Tennis rules and techniques with information
mohsintariq167876
 
Understanding Golf Simulator Equipment A Beginner's Guide.pdf
Understanding Golf Simulator Equipment A Beginner's Guide.pdfUnderstanding Golf Simulator Equipment A Beginner's Guide.pdf
Understanding Golf Simulator Equipment A Beginner's Guide.pdf
My Garage Golf
 
Gabriel Kalembo A Rising Star in the World of Football Coaching
Gabriel Kalembo A Rising Star in the World of Football CoachingGabriel Kalembo A Rising Star in the World of Football Coaching
Gabriel Kalembo A Rising Star in the World of Football Coaching
gabrielkalembous
 
JORNADA 10 LIGA MURO 2024BASQUETBOL1.pdf
JORNADA 10 LIGA MURO 2024BASQUETBOL1.pdfJORNADA 10 LIGA MURO 2024BASQUETBOL1.pdf
JORNADA 10 LIGA MURO 2024BASQUETBOL1.pdf
Arturo Pacheco Alvarez
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Belgium vs Romania Injuries and Patience in Belgium’s Euro Cup Germany Squad....
Belgium vs Romania Injuries and Patience in Belgium’s Euro Cup Germany Squad....Belgium vs Romania Injuries and Patience in Belgium’s Euro Cup Germany Squad....
Belgium vs Romania Injuries and Patience in Belgium’s Euro Cup Germany Squad....
 
CAA Region II Day 1 Morning Result Accra event
CAA Region II Day 1 Morning Result Accra eventCAA Region II Day 1 Morning Result Accra event
CAA Region II Day 1 Morning Result Accra event
 
Georgia vs Portugal Georgia UEFA Euro 2024 Squad Khvicha Kvaratskhelia Leads ...
Georgia vs Portugal Georgia UEFA Euro 2024 Squad Khvicha Kvaratskhelia Leads ...Georgia vs Portugal Georgia UEFA Euro 2024 Squad Khvicha Kvaratskhelia Leads ...
Georgia vs Portugal Georgia UEFA Euro 2024 Squad Khvicha Kvaratskhelia Leads ...
 
MESH IPL 2024 REport_Wavemaker India.pdf
MESH IPL 2024 REport_Wavemaker India.pdfMESH IPL 2024 REport_Wavemaker India.pdf
MESH IPL 2024 REport_Wavemaker India.pdf
 
Boletin de la I Copa Panamericana de Voleibol Femenino U17 Guatemala 2024
Boletin de la I Copa Panamericana de Voleibol Femenino U17 Guatemala 2024Boletin de la I Copa Panamericana de Voleibol Femenino U17 Guatemala 2024
Boletin de la I Copa Panamericana de Voleibol Femenino U17 Guatemala 2024
 
Italy vs Albania Soul and sacrifice' are the keys to success for Albania at E...
Italy vs Albania Soul and sacrifice' are the keys to success for Albania at E...Italy vs Albania Soul and sacrifice' are the keys to success for Albania at E...
Italy vs Albania Soul and sacrifice' are the keys to success for Albania at E...
 
Switzerland vs Germany At UEFA Euro 2024 the Full squad, preview, match sched...
Switzerland vs Germany At UEFA Euro 2024 the Full squad, preview, match sched...Switzerland vs Germany At UEFA Euro 2024 the Full squad, preview, match sched...
Switzerland vs Germany At UEFA Euro 2024 the Full squad, preview, match sched...
 
Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...
Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...
Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...
 
Hesan Soufi's Legacy: Inspiring the Next Generation
Hesan Soufi's Legacy: Inspiring the Next GenerationHesan Soufi's Legacy: Inspiring the Next Generation
Hesan Soufi's Legacy: Inspiring the Next Generation
 
Luciano Spalletti Leads Italy's Transition at UEFA Euro 2024.docx
Luciano Spalletti Leads Italy's Transition at UEFA Euro 2024.docxLuciano Spalletti Leads Italy's Transition at UEFA Euro 2024.docx
Luciano Spalletti Leads Italy's Transition at UEFA Euro 2024.docx
 
Match By Match Detailed Schedule Of The ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024.pdf
Match By Match Detailed Schedule Of The ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024.pdfMatch By Match Detailed Schedule Of The ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024.pdf
Match By Match Detailed Schedule Of The ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024.pdf
 
Netherlands vs Austria Netherlands Face Familiar Foes in Euro Cup Germany Gro...
Netherlands vs Austria Netherlands Face Familiar Foes in Euro Cup Germany Gro...Netherlands vs Austria Netherlands Face Familiar Foes in Euro Cup Germany Gro...
Netherlands vs Austria Netherlands Face Familiar Foes in Euro Cup Germany Gro...
 
Spain vs Croatia Spain aims to put aside the RFEF crisis as they chase Euro C...
Spain vs Croatia Spain aims to put aside the RFEF crisis as they chase Euro C...Spain vs Croatia Spain aims to put aside the RFEF crisis as they chase Euro C...
Spain vs Croatia Spain aims to put aside the RFEF crisis as they chase Euro C...
 
Belgium vs Slovakia Belgium Euro 2024 Golden Generation Faces Euro Cup Final ...
Belgium vs Slovakia Belgium Euro 2024 Golden Generation Faces Euro Cup Final ...Belgium vs Slovakia Belgium Euro 2024 Golden Generation Faces Euro Cup Final ...
Belgium vs Slovakia Belgium Euro 2024 Golden Generation Faces Euro Cup Final ...
 
Psaroudakis: Family and Football – The Psaroudakis Success Story
Psaroudakis: Family and Football – The Psaroudakis Success StoryPsaroudakis: Family and Football – The Psaroudakis Success Story
Psaroudakis: Family and Football – The Psaroudakis Success Story
 
Belgium vs Romania Ultimate Guide to Euro Cup 2024 Tactics, Ticketing, and Qu...
Belgium vs Romania Ultimate Guide to Euro Cup 2024 Tactics, Ticketing, and Qu...Belgium vs Romania Ultimate Guide to Euro Cup 2024 Tactics, Ticketing, and Qu...
Belgium vs Romania Ultimate Guide to Euro Cup 2024 Tactics, Ticketing, and Qu...
 
Tennis rules and techniques with information
Tennis rules and techniques with informationTennis rules and techniques with information
Tennis rules and techniques with information
 
Understanding Golf Simulator Equipment A Beginner's Guide.pdf
Understanding Golf Simulator Equipment A Beginner's Guide.pdfUnderstanding Golf Simulator Equipment A Beginner's Guide.pdf
Understanding Golf Simulator Equipment A Beginner's Guide.pdf
 
Gabriel Kalembo A Rising Star in the World of Football Coaching
Gabriel Kalembo A Rising Star in the World of Football CoachingGabriel Kalembo A Rising Star in the World of Football Coaching
Gabriel Kalembo A Rising Star in the World of Football Coaching
 
JORNADA 10 LIGA MURO 2024BASQUETBOL1.pdf
JORNADA 10 LIGA MURO 2024BASQUETBOL1.pdfJORNADA 10 LIGA MURO 2024BASQUETBOL1.pdf
JORNADA 10 LIGA MURO 2024BASQUETBOL1.pdf
 

Bracketology talk at the Crossroads of ideas

  • 1. The Math Behind the March Madness Tournament and College Football Playoff Laura Albert McLay Associate Professor, ISYE laura@engr.wisc.edu @lauramclay @badgerbrackets http://bracketology.engr.wisc.edu/
  • 2. Let’s start with the 2 minute version of my talk https://www.facebook.com/UWMadison/videos/10154004638653114/
  • 3. First, of all… I’m a industrial and systems engineering professor by day And a bracketologist by night!
  • 4. I study systems A system is a set of things—people, cells, vehicles, basketball teams, or whatever—interconnected in such a way that they produce their own pattern of behavior over time. My discipline is operations research: the science of making decisions using advanced analytical methods
  • 5. Our world is becoming increasingly complex and increasingly connected Systems matter! Mathematical models and systems thinking help us study systems and navigate the complex, interconnected world we live in.
  • 6. What do we hope to learn from probability models like Markov chains? • How do we draw conclusions from limited data? • How can we make data-driven decisions in the presence of uncertainty?
  • 7. How I got started in bracketology In 2014 someone suggested I examine bracketology in the context of the first College Football Playoff… …and so began Badger Bracketology My objective: forecast which teams would make the first college football playoff before the season was over.
  • 8. Markov chains: The Little Engine that Could Markov chains: A type of math model for understanding how a system can evolve over time. Uses: finance, epidemiology, queues, zombies
  • 9. Markov chains for ranking teams in a nutshell Each team is a state. A team “votes” for teams that that it loses to http://sumnous.github.io/blog/2014/07/24/gephi-on-mac/ Graph of 2014 college football season
  • 10. Simple yet powerful idea Automatically rate and ranks teams by taking advantage of the network structure of the match ups • Use Markov chains to account for strength of schedule • Do not need a human in the loop Simple data requirements: 1. Game outcomes (score differentials), 2. Home/away status Takes difficulty of future games into account in football playoff forecasts • Polls give the ranking right now, only gives insight a playoff held today
  • 11. Google PageRank is a Markov model! Source: google.com
  • 12. Do you remember Internet searches before Google? https://www.wordstream.com/articles/internet-search-engines-history
  • 13. First, let’s talk about ranking basketball teams
  • 14. Transitions Rutgers 52 @ Wisconsin 72 Wisconsin Rutgers 1 − 𝑊 𝑊 𝑊 1 − 𝑊 How much credit should Wisconsin get for beating Rutgers by 20 at home? 𝑊 = effective wins (fraction of a vote), which help us compute our Markov chain transition probabilities
  • 15. Let’s find a data-driven answer! Given that team 𝑖 beat team 𝑗 by 𝑥 points at home, what is the probability that 𝑖 is a better team than 𝑗 on a neutral court? Data: Some teams play twice per season (home  away) Given that team 𝑖 beat team 𝑗 by 𝑥 points at home, what is the probability that 𝑖 is a better team than 𝑗 on 𝑗′ 𝑠 home court? 𝑟𝑥 𝐻 𝑟𝑥 𝐴 = probability that a team outscores its opponent by 𝑥 points at home 𝐻 (away 𝐴) is better than its opponent on a neutral 𝑁 site Developed by Sokol, Kvam, Nemhauser, and Brown at Georgia Tech to rank NCAA men’s basketball teams https://www2.isye.gatech.edu/~jsokol/lrmc/
  • 16. What is the probability you win your next game (on the road) given that you win by 20 at home?
  • 17. Logistic regression to the rescue! Problem 1: must win by 50+ points to get a lot of credit for a win! Winning/losing close games gives you the same amount of “credit” Margin of victory 𝑥 Probabilityofwinningontheroadnexttime Problem 2: We need to get neutral site win probabilities
  • 18. Logistic regression for NCAA men’s basketball • Use log (Point differentials) instead! • Do not truncate point differentials -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Point differential Effectivewins
  • 19. Winning matters • Average in a pure win/loss model to give more credit for winning the game -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Point differential Effectivewins -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Point differential Effectivewins
  • 20. Putting it all together • End up with the red line! -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Point differential Effectivewins -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Point differential Effectivewins
  • 21. Markov chain transition probabilities Rutgers 52 @ Wisconsin 72 * Wisconsin Rutgers 1 − 𝑊 𝑊 𝑊 1 − 𝑊 How much credit should Wisconsin get for beating Rutgers by 20 at home? P(UW beats Rutgers on a neutral court) = 0.6255 𝑊 = 0.6817 effective wins (fraction of a vote) * Wisconsin 61 @ Rutgers 54 later on 1/28/2017
  • 22. Transitions Same idea for the rest of the games… Wisconsin Minnesota Northwestern Rutgers Illinois
  • 23. Current rankings 3/12/2017 Selection Sunday 1 Gonzaga 2 Villanova 3 Kentucky 4 SMU 5 Wichita St 6 Arizona 7 UCLA 8 Duke 9 Cincinnati 10 Oregon 11 MTSU 12 North Carolina 13 St Marys CA 14 West Virginia 15 Kansas 16 Nevada 17 Purdue 18 Vermont 19 UNC Wilmington 20 Michigan 21 Florida St 22 VA Commonwealth 23 Notre Dame 24 Bucknell 25 Wisconsin
  • 24. The B1G, ranked. 3/12/2017 17 Purdue 20 Michigan 25 Wisconsin 41 Northwestern 43 Minnesota 54 Maryland 78 Indiana 87 Michigan St 121 Iowa 130 Illinois 141 Ohio St 176 Penn St 187 Rutgers 242 Nebraska
  • 25. How did we do last year? 3/13/2016 Selection Sunday 1. North Carolina 2. Kansas 3. Villanova 4. Michigan St 5. Virginia 6. West Virginia 7. Oklahoma 8. Kentucky 9. Oregon 10. Purdue 11. Xavier 12. Miami FL 13. Duke 14. Utah 15. Texas A&M 16. Louisville 17. Maryland 18. Arizona 19. Seton Hall 20. Iowa St 21. Indiana 22. California 23. Baylor 24. St Josephs PA 25. Iowa
  • 26. Now let’s talk about the College Football Playoff
  • 27. College Football Playoff Objective: determine which teams would make the first college football playoff. Goal: to forecast the top 4 teams weeks before the season ends. Solution method: a ranking method. Challenge: need to simulate the remainder of the season and rank the teams at the end of the (simulated) season.
  • 28. Giant assumption • We assume the selection committee will pick the four ranked teams in the playoff. • History suggests that humans prefer the most deserving teams rather than the best teams in the national championship game. • E.g., 2013 Alabama lost on a fluke play. • …but the College Football Selection Committee might have changed this! 2013 BCS Rankings just before bowl bids
  • 29. College football playoff committee rankings 2014 Playoff rankings 2015 Playoff rankings
  • 30. How we did last year 2016 Playoff Rankings Badger Bracketology rankings 1 Alabama 2 Ohio State 3 Clemson 3 Washington 5 Michigan 6 Penn State 7 Western Michigan 8 Louisville 9 Oklahoma 10 Wisconsin :(
  • 31. Model: two parts 0. Observe a few (7-8) weeks of game outcomes 1. Ranking. • Assign a rating to each team to rank the teams. • Similar to what we had before but with college football data 2. Game simulation. • Determine who wins a game based on the team ratings. Simulate the next week’s game outcomes. • Combine these: • Re-rate and re-rank after each week of games. • Simulate the remainder of the season. • Report teams most likely to be in the top 4
  • 32. Score differentials Yes, running up the score matters, mathematically. Histogram of score differentials, 2012-2014 Home score - away score Frequency -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 050100150200
  • 33. Capped score differentials 38% of conference games fall beyond the cap Histogram of score differentials capped at +/-21, 2012-2014 Home score - away score Frequency -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 050100150200250 Note: Rating systems used by College Football Playoff committee must use wins/losses only (not score differentials). Running up the score makes a difference!
  • 34. -20 -10 0 10 20 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Point differential Effectivewins Sx H rx H rx N Build the Markov chain for football • Used 3 seasons of data (truncate scores by +/-21) • Use games played in consecutive years to identify win probabilities to feed into the Markov chain -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 logistic regression logistic regression averaged with win (weight = 2/3) logistic regression averaged with win (weight = 1/3)
  • 35. Modified Log Logistic Regression Markov Chain (ln(mLRMC)) • Same as mLRMC except that we consider log point differentials to dampen big score differentials • Do not truncate point differentials -20 -10 0 10 20 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Point differential Effectivewins logistic regression (home team) logistic regression averaged with win
  • 36. Markov chain transitions Use mLRMC and ln(mLRMC) for all games
  • 37. Simulate the rest of the season! 0. Observe a few (7-8) weeks of game outcomes 1. Ranking. • Assign a rating to each team to rank the teams. 2. Game simulation. • Determine who wins a game based on the team ratings. Simulate the next week’s game outcomes. • Combine these: • Re-rate and re-rank after each week of games. • Simulate the remainder of the season. • Report teams most likely to be in the top 4
  • 38. Win probability parameters The win probability between teams 𝑖 and 𝑗, where 𝑖 is the home team is captured by the best-fit logistic regression model using two years of game data: 𝑝𝑖𝑗 = 𝑒 𝑏+𝑎(𝑟 𝑖−𝑟 𝑗) 1 + 𝑒 𝑏+𝑎(𝑟 𝑖−𝑟 𝑗) where 𝑟𝑖 − 𝑟𝑗 = the difference in ratings between the two teams. and assign a point differential to the winner. Game prediction accuracy (averaged per game) Statistic Model Training set Test set Mean Absolute Error mLRMC 0.2043 0.3152 ln(mLRMC) 0.2026 0.3162 Mean Squared Error mLRMC 0.1006 0.1885 ln(mLRMC) 0.0999 0.1897
  • 39. College football playoff committee rankings 2016 Playoff rankings2015 Playoff rankings
  • 40. 2016 Results: Rankings (NOW) Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Alabama CFP Committee 1 1 1 1 1 1 ln(mLRMC) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Clemson CFP Committee 2 2 4 4 3 2 ln(mLRMC) 3 4 3 3 5 4 4 3 OSU CFP Committee 6 5 2 2 2 3 ln(mLRMC) 4 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 Washington CFP Committee 5 4 6 5 4 4 ln(mLRMC) 8 7 6 6 6 6 5 3* * Clemson and Washington were tied
  • 41. 2016 Results: Rankings Forecasted ranking of likelihood to make playoff (any seed, out of 1000) Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Alabama ln(mLRMC) Forecasted ranking 1 1 1 1 1 1 NA ln(mLRMC) now ranking 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Clemson ln(mLRMC) Forecasted ranking 2 2 2 2 2 3 NA ln(mLRMC) now ranking 3 4 3 3 5 4 4 3 OSU ln(mLRMC) Forecasted ranking 5 5 5 4 5 2 NA ln(mLRMC) now ranking 4 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 Washington ln(mLRMC) Forecasted ranking 3 4 4 6 4 4 NA ln(mLRMC) now ranking 8 7 6 6 6 6 5 3* * Clemson and Washington were tied
  • 42. 2015 Results: Rankings (NOW) Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Clemson CFP Committee 1 1 1 1 1 1 mLRMC 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 2 ln(mLRMC) 7 5 1 1 2 1 1 2 Alabama CFP Committee 4 2 2 2 2 2 mLRMC 4 5 8 3 1 2 1 1 ln(mLRMC) 5 4 6 2 1 2 2 1 MSU CFP Committee 7 13 9 5 5 3 mLRMC 6 4 5 9 9 5 5 3 ln(mLRMC) 6 2 4 7 8 4 4 3 Oklahoma CFP Committee 15 12 7 3 3 4 mLRMC 16 13 13 8 5 3 1 4 ln(mLRMC) 18 12 16 10 5 5 3 4
  • 43. Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Clemson mLRMC 667 897 931 905 915 949 956 ln(mLRMC) 749 840 897 893 955 923 976 Alabama mLRMC 361 209 166 837 913 943 995 ln(mLRMC) 427 240 197 858 847 931 996 MSU mLRMC 179 213 261 54 24 569 675 ln(mLRMC) 226 349 354 115 162 573 706 Oklahoma mLRMC 20 46 71 119 393 758 1000 ln(mLRMC) 12 73 16 63 142 247 1000 2015 Results: Forecasted number of times to make playoff (out of 1000) Nebraska beats MSU MSU beats The OSU No Big12 championship Slight difference in rankings: 3rd /4th vs. 5th /6th
  • 44. 2015 Results: Forecasted ranking of likelihood to make playoff (any seed, out of 1000) Team Method Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Clemson mLRMC 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 ln(mLRMC) 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 Alabama mLRMC 5 7 6 2 2 2 2 1 ln(mLRMC) 4 6 8 2 1 1 2 1 MSU mLRMC 7 6 7 11 10 4 4 3 ln(mLRMC) 6 5 5 9 6 3 4 3 Oklahoma mLRMC 18 13 13 9 4 3 1 4 ln(mLRMC) 21 15 14 12 8 6 1 4 No Big12 championship No simulation: the season is over. We think the committee got it right! Ranked 2nd & 7th after week 7 Ranked 5th & 4th after week 9
  • 45. 2015 Results: What happened to The Ohio State University? Rankings after week 12 Forecasted rankings after week 12 1. Clemson 1. Clemson 2. Alabama 2. Alabama 3. Oklahoma 3. Oklahoma 4. Notre Dame 4. Michigan State 5. Michigan State 5. Iowa 6. Ohio State 6. Notre Dame 7. Iowa 7. Stanford 8. Florida 8. Florida 9. Michigan 9. Ohio State 10. Stanford (no other teams have >1% chance of making the playoff)
  • 46. Final thoughts about March Madness
  • 47. Picking the perfect bracket There are about 9.2 quintillion ways to fill out a bracket… And 1 way to fill out a perfect bracket The odds of filling out a perfect bracket are not 9- quintillion-to-1 because: (a) the tournament isn’t like the lottery where every outcome is equally likely, and (b) monkeys are not randomly selecting game outcomes. Instead, people are purposefully selecting outcomes.
  • 48. Can math help our odds? FiveThirtyEight notes that the typical bracket has a 2.5 trillion-to-1 odds of being perfect: • https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/march-madness- perfect-bracket-odds/ BracketOdds at Illinois estimates that a historical average winning bracket performs at 4.4 billion-to-1 • Warren Buffet may have to pay out!
  • 49. The thing with perfect brackets They depend on the year. Let’s only look at how many people correctly select all Final Four teams: – 1140 of 13 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2016 – 182,709 of 11.57 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2015 * – 612 of 11 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2014 – 47 of 8.15 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2013 – 23,304 of 6.45 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2012 – 2 of 5.9 million brackets correctly picked all Final Four teams in 2011 * Only 1 bracket emerged from the round of 64 with all 32 correct picks
  • 50. Tips for winning your office pool
  • 51. 1. Don’t use RPI • Badger Bracketology (my favorite tool!) • Logistic Regression Markov Chain (LRMC) • FiveThirtyEight rankings of tournament teams • Ken Pomoroy’s rankings • Sagarin rankings • Massey Ratings • ESPN’s BPI rankings Rankings clearinghouse: http://www.masseyratings.com/cb/compare.htm
  • 52. 2. Pay attention to the seeds Some seeds generate more upsets than others • 7-10 seeds and 5/12 seeds Historically, 6/11 seeds go the longest before facing a 1 or 2 seed.
  • 53. 3. Don’t pick Kansas • Be strategic. The point is NOT to maximize your points, it’s to get more points than your opponents • Differentiate your Final Four • Check ESPN for the top picked teams. Some top teams are overvalued and others are undervalued • Last year: • Kansas was selected as the overall winner in 27% of brackets (and in 62% of Final Fours) with a 19% chance of winning (538) • UNC selected as overall winner in 8% of brackets (with a 15% win probability) and Villanova in 5.5% http://games.espn.com/tournament-challenge-bracket/2016/en/whopickedwhom https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-march-madness-predictions/
  • 54. 4. It’s totally random A good process yields good outcomes on average • It does not guarantee the best outcome in any given tournament Small pools are better if you have a good process • Scoring can be random • The more brackets, the higher chance that a “random” bracket will be the best
  • 55. Topics in Sports Analytics ISYE 601 in Spring 2017! • Goal: teach students data-driven methods for making better decisions using sports as a vehicle • Course topics: • Linear regression • Logistic regression • Empirical Bayes • Ranking methods • Probability models and Markov chains • Forecasting • Game theory • Tournament scheduling • Networks (is my team mathematically eliminated from the playoffs?) …and more!
  • 57. Thank you! Laura Albert McLay laura@engr.wisc.edu punkrockOR.com bracketology.engr.wisc.edu Twitter: @lauramclay, @badgerbrackets