Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Letter to chief justice of inida about india crying for help
1. 03.06.2013
To,
The Hon‟ble Chief Justice
Supreme Court of India,
Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110 001 (India)
Sir,
Sub: India Crying for your HELP KINDLY SAFE IT
Sir, I am writing the letter trusting and requesting that you
will feel my pain and read between the lines and understand
unwritten things also….and I apologize for any thing which I
may have written unknowingly …
I bring to your kind attention the fallacies being brought in
our country due to the same polices being pursued by the
government as were done by the British people , though on
independence we have presumed that people representatives will
act as public servants . We were approved wrong. Now it is the
time , Judiciary can take the role to clean the administration
by interpretation of law in favour of citizens of India by
taking the things so motto .
Let me tell one out of many wrong things being pursued by our
worthy elected representatives and they can go to any extent to
rule .
Rule 14 as originally made by our forefathers and makers of
constitution , rightly put that
2. “there will be no discrimination on the basis of religion, race, caste,
sex or place of birth ……………..
Immediately on independence they divided the society on the
basis of caste by including certain caste in the schedule to be
named as Scheduled castes …….. and providing some special
facilities to them “”””‟‟ instead to treating all citizens as
equal and in case they have to provide the special facilities
they should have provided or provide on some basis which is
applicable to every citizen of India like landless, homeless or
any other criteria:::::;;
When it was challenged , they modified the constitution ;;;;;;
Then it became constitutional
Now they are trying to divide the society on the basis of
religion >>>>>>
It will be held unconstitutional;;;;;;; then they will change
constitution „‟‟‟‟‟ it will become constitutional …… and you
judiciary will held so …..think?
I put a extreme example ___- suppose they pass a law that every
MP has a right to make say one person as slave on his sweet
will ;;;;;;certainly it will be unconstitutional “”””””” then
they change Article 14 and Article 19 providing exception as
they provided under Article 14 earlier , some particular sect
3. will be treated as class and equality be only within
class……………. Then you will have no option but to held it is
constitutional ;;;;;; and this may happen one day in India as
it is already happening in India….whatever the court declare it
is unconstitutional they change it and make it
constitutional;;;;;;;;
Then where the people will go;;;;
Let me tell the consequences of 1951 amendment ;;;;;; there are
substandard doctors and other professionals in India , who is
bond to take the services of them ;;;;;;;only poor and helpless
people
Let me give one example only::;;when ever a politician / a
person in highups fell ill who looks after him, best doctors in
Country , rather they go outside India for treatment
;;;;whether they thought that some quota of MPs be reserved who
are to be looked after by the doctors who are in reserved
category ---- if not then how they are being impacted by this
reservation ------ Like wise for other professionals . And only
the poor people have left to take their services and ultimately
for whose benefit we have provided for it , in real sense we
are harming their interest on a larger scale .
The poor people of India have no right to being looked after by
the competent professionals , and the messiahs of so called
downtrodden people have a right to go abroad and best
professional for their services ;;;;;;;
4. One more consequences , suppose a son a Judge of High Court /
Supreme court or say of any highups who happens to belong to
the caste which comes under schedule and son of a petty
shopkeeper or a maid servant who happens to belong to caste
which does not happen in the schedule , whether to give the
preference to the previous one upon the later one , is
justified? Whether our forefathers have thought like that……
Certainly not …… BUt it is happening in India……..in the name of
justice being given……. And equality among a class…….
Now whether it is possible to change the trend;;;;as we know to
make the law is the privilege of Parliament ::::; what who will
make the law which goes against them;;;;;;?
You are aware that the British people had made the laws to
treat us salves and they have not made any law to make their
acts accountable , and still those laws exists and our
parliamentarians inherited those laws and have not made any
law till date which question their acts‟‟‟‟‟‟‟‟like Lokpal
……………. and such a petty situation exists for we people where we
are dependent on those very people whose acts we want to be
held accountable and they very people have to make the law
>>>>.such a peculiar situation in which we live …….. and what
is a solution of this problem::::::::;
What still we are fortunate that we have independent Judiciary
which can watch the interest of poor people of India . Pl do
act .
As in case when it is matter of knowledge and brain we should
have best to look after every citizens ;;;;;;; Thus you have to
5. act very carefully as you may not afford to make mistakes as
done by Judiciary in 1951 holding the amendment in Article 14
as constitutional :::: treating a class as separate
class:::::::; what they can , they can extend wider the scope
of backward classes “””””‟‟‟
I trust you will take my concern in right unrest and I will be
able to listen something from you>>>>>..
Jai Hind
Krishan Singla
1 FF Prem Vihar
SBS Nagar
Ludhiana