Globalization In The Four Horseman

Globalization In The Four Horseman
Globalization is becoming an important dynamic in the modern world as it affects all areas of life
from politics, economics, and culture. Most prevalent in the globalizing world today is the disparity
of wealth being distributed unequally. The documentary the Four Horseman, directed by Ross
Ashcroft, discusses the processes and consequences of how wealth is distributed within American
society, and is relatable to the theories of both Samir Amin, with the journal article "Ending the
Crisis of Capitalism or Ending Capitalism", and William I. Robinson's "Global Class Formation and
the Rise of a Transnational Class". According to the documentary the Four Horsemen, American
society is at a turning point of history in which globalized populations are now governed under the
power of corporations and wealthy individuals (Ashcroft 2012). Globalization began with the
creation of empires, and therefore the creation of private economies. After the second World War the
United States held over 50% of the gross domestic products produced in the world making America
the new "Roman Empire" of the globalizing world. Every empire, according to Sir John Glubb,
follows six stages as to which an empire rises and eventually falls, and is believed to be applicable
to the United States (Ashcroft 2012). The Stages range from the age of pioneers, the age of
conquest, the age of commerce, the age of affluence, the age of intelligence, and lastly the age of
decadence (Ashcroft 2012). The age of
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Robbins Global Problems And The Culture Of Capitalism
(1) Throughout the text, "Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism" Robbins discusses the
effects of consumerism on the modern world today. He emphasizes multiple times how the world no
longer lives by what they need but rather by they want. Though this has marked a historical global
era to Robbins, it is not necessarily a positive effect on humanity. It is known by the corporations
who sell goods to consumers that people have begun to literally glorify their wants into needs very
strongly. However, the average adult is not the only target of the schemes since children have
become their own category in marketing after psychologists have shown that each child has their
own needs and wants. Consequently, after this new marketing tactic everyone

The Historical Development Of Capitalism
The most effective system to exist in the world, capitalism, triumphed in uniting the world into a
solitary system. Capitalism can be defined as "an economic system in which employers hire workers
to produce goods and services that will be marketed with the intention of making a profit" (Bowles
et al., 2005) (p. 74). Furthermore, the social order is significantly impacted by the relationship
between the capitalist mode of production and the mode of exchange, however, there is a rebuttal in
the economic order of this system. The purpose of this essay is to, first explain what Engel's means
by historical materialism, and then to analyze the fundamental contradictions the capitalist mode of
production has on the social order, and examine the social and economic problems that arise from
the contradiction. The conclusion of this essay will state the outcome of the historical development
of capitalism, according to Engels. It is very important for one to understand the concept of
historical materialism before analyzing Engels' ideas and critiques of capitalism. Historical
materialism examines the material conditions of the society, along with social relations and social
structure. In simple words, this means that material conditions shape the social structure and
economy. In his work "Theoretical," Engels establishes what he means by historical materialism.
Engels (1939) states "The materialist conception of history starts from the principle that production,
and with

A Critical Analysis of Michael Jordan and the New Global...
A Critical Analysis of Michael Jordan and the New Global Capitalism
In the history of business, there has been a clear record of industry heads finding something or
someone as a mainstay and bedrock for their respective companies or corporations; there is often a
chief product that keeps many businesses afloat, even in the rough times. Apple found it's own in
2001 with the iPod. McDonald's has had the Big Mac since the late 1960s. Nike, however, found
their goldmine in a person with Michael Jordan. Walter LaFeber's Michael Jordan and the New
Global Capitalism tells the paints the picture of the rise of young Michael Jordan from his middle–
class family in racist North Carolina up through college and into the NBA where he becomes an ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Stemming away from Jordan personally, it also touches on how the expansion of Nike created issues
with regard to race by way of cultural and value–based analysis of black culture and effect that the
Air Jordan shoe had on its people. One example of which is shown from the black on black crime
that ensued as a result of the marketing of the Air Jordan in the 1990s. Significance in the arena
black business is also evident. Obvious significance is shown from the growth of the business of
Michael Jordan himself. It shows how a single man can amass wealth starting one–dimensionally as
a person with extraordinary athletic talent and transitioning into one who takes the reigns as the
leader of his own division of a transnational corporation while still working to his own and his
brand's marketability. It's also subtly important to show how the Nike product also spiked the dollar
seen by inner city ‘mom and pop' athletic apparel stores, mostly black owned. Chapter 4 touches on
the effect of the Air Jordan on inner cities, both good and bad, and even though there was crime and
drug money involved with the sales of Air Jordans, it is still hard to ignore the increase of money
that resulted as well. Lastly, LaFeber's book provides informational significance of the expansion of
global capitalism in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. It not only shows how Nike became the
worlds largest company in sports apparel but also how the Chicago Bulls organization increased

Capitalism on Wages and Income Essay
Introduction
Capitalism is an economic system in which industry, trade and factor and means of production are
controlled by private investors or owners with an aim of making profit in a market economy. It
affects the rate of capital accumulation, labor wage and the control of competitive market. This
usually affects the economy of different societies since the government has no control over the
economy. The forces of capitalism greatly affect the societies in that the poor continues to be poorer
while the reach society continues to accumulate wealthy and become richer. It widens the income
disparity gap. It influences both the economic aspect and social aspect of the societies largely. This
mainly is influenced by the forces that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For the wages to increase mostly the intensity of labor and cost of long hours are inevitable.
Therefore, capitalist cannot benefit the poor.
Capitalism and free trade According to Richard N (2006), the free movement of goods due to free
market or trade has led to globalization. Though the effects have been assumed to benefit all, there is
a large inequality among the poor and the rich both within the countries among the nations.
Capitalism is contributed to technological advancement, which has then influenced free trade. The
uncontrolled globalization has resulted in more developed societies becoming rich. The rich
economies are able to exploit the market by producing at lower price due to their level of technology
and advancement in research. They are also able to protect their economy through export subsidies
and production subsidies to their farmers. This translates to lower prices for their goods in the global
market hence controlling it. The poor countries despite having comparative advantage in production
of some commodities they also suffer from competitive advantage from the developed countries
they are forced to sell their commodities at a lower price than their expected. They suffer a lot in
global trade, which is mainly controlled by the wealthier nations. There are regulations, which
restrict the flow of goods in the world market from poor societies. This makes

How Did Panitch And Sam Gindin Argue In The Making Of...
two socialist thinkers, Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin (2012) argue in "the making of global
capitalism" that capitalism on a global scale wouldn't have been a possibility without the leadership
of America as this empire is the rule maker that sets the agenda for capitalist development. This
essay will investigate the strengths and weaknesses with this claim and will argue that if
Americanisation is overestimated, Panitch and Gindin risk failing to account for other possible
forces like TNCs and for political and social spaces. Furthermore, it is misleading to treat capital as
mainly national and seeing the state as an actor as the state is in fact simply only a reflection of
social activities.
Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin (2012) argue that modern ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Here, they acknowledge how states can be self–interest as they seek to secure their own capital
growth. They continue to argue that the US forms a sort of informal empire where America "requires
the economic and cultural penetration of other states to be sustained by political and military
coordination with other independent governments" (Panitch & Gindin,2004, p.8).
With the growth of financial capital in the neoliberal era, Panitch and Gindin acknowledge how US
capital became almost a social force that became embedded within other capitalistic nations. In
short, they are arguing that the US has the capacity to control capitalism on a global scale and thus,
the state must be brought back into theoretical research. Capitalism does not necessarily mean a
separation between the political and the economy but argues instead for a differentiation and for the
autonomous state (Panitch & Gindin, 2012,

Impact Of Global Capitalism On The World Economy
Although there is no single theory to explain the spatial organisation of production regions in the
world economy, we continue to see core–periphery patterns and concentrations of activities in
specific areas despite powerful forces of globalisation expanding markets and integrating
economies. This has created a huge globally expansive network of information, capital and technical
flows across regions facilitated through market liberalization, border reductions between countries
and the erosion of particular places. The presence of economies of scale, scope and agglomeration
play significant roles in explaining the concentration and development of economic activity in
particular areas. These forces of concentration and dispersal even in the context of the expanding
territorial scope of global capitalism, still remain powerful and we continue to observe the
importance of place under globalisation (Massey 1984). Although natural environmental conditions
are influential in the development of regions, capitalism is the dominant form of contemporary
economic organisation due to historical geography. Indeed, the capitalist word economy is
structured around the dynamics of specialisation and the division of labour, whereby countries
produce and trade goods and services where they obtain comparative, competitive advantage and
lowest opportunity cost. In a capitalist economy specialisation (the act of focusing on a specific
work task) leads to higher productivity, output and product

The Rana Plaza Building Collapse
The collapsing of the Rana Plaza building in the Dhaka suburb of Savar, is a tragic incident that
occurred on April 24, 2013 (Prashad 2013). The Rana Plaza building was the establishment that had
workers who were the commodity of the production of garments that are sold to the Western market.
A couple days post–collapse, it was reported that the death toll was well into the triple–digits. This
paper will draw on the details of pre– and post– Rana Plaza's collapsing while connecting it to Marx
and Engels' ideologies in response to the four questions and/or issues. Marx's dialectical method and
thinking can be used to tackle the issue about the structural propensity of capitalism to be global
because he rejects the either–or dichotomy. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The biological analogy raised by the instructor can be used to interpret the aforementioned in the
simplest manner by visualizing a caterpillar evolving into a butterfly. Nonetheless, this is a naturally
occurring process and is the same way Marx wants the people to interpret the constant social change
that is the structural propensity of capitalism to be global. That being said, Marx again is a
dialectical thinker so believing only in constant change alone is one–sided in his perspective.
Another quote raised by the instructor is the "unity of opposites." Essentially, this quote ties in with
the dialectical method and suggests that although social change is inevitable in the eyes of Marx, it
is at the same time not the only thing happening. Rather, Marx is hinting that there is an underlying
theme that constantly remains the same. Simply put, this is the conflict between the capitalist and
the worker, leading to the next issue to be covered in this paper. Going back to the collapsing of the
Rana Plaza, Prashad reveals that there appears to be a trend of factory buildings collapsing in the
twenty–first century, specifically "poorly built shelters for a production process geared toward long
working days, third rate machines, and workers

Marxism's Tools for Contemporary International Relations...
After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War between the Western Bloc and
Eastern Bloc, the enduring ideological conflict between communism and capitalism was seen to
come to an end. The global order has since entered into a neo–liberal capitalist era, with neo–liberal
ideologies characterizing the various dimensions of the global order, such as international politics
and economics. As the world is homogenizing into neo–liberal capitalist orders, the rich substances
of the Marxist school on international relations seem rather distanced. However, this essay will
argue the contrary. It seeks to justify that, instead of being irrelevant under the contemporary
international relations, Marxism offer vital tools to contest ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Capitalism and neo–liberal ideologies have been adopted by the world as the natural orders, and
relevant policies are taken as the common sense policies to be adopted for nations to prosper
(Hobden & Jones, 2011). This can be represented by the policy union of nations around the world,
particularly, developing countries. Many developing countries, more often than not, pursue neo–
liberal policies, namely trade liberalization and reductions in state expenditure in the attempt to
attain economic growth and sustain prosperity. In the private sector, entrepreneurism, risk–taking,
and profit maximization are seen to be the drivers for sustaining prosperity and growth. Individual
prosperity and happiness are seen as being intimately tied to monetary gain and materialism. This
union of ideologies, be them at the national, economical, or individual level, do not take place in
isolated regions. Rather, they are widely adopted, and its spread is accelerating under globalization.
In the contemporary globalizing world economy that is converging on capitalist principles, various
issues arise in the realm of international relations. One of them is capitalist imperialism. Given the
power of capitalists enhanced by technological advances, mobility, and easing of regulations, they
are able to extend their power to almost every corner of the world. Often time, their activities are
linked to exploitations of the labour, resources, economic and political

The Works Of Richard Robbins : Global Problem And The...
The works of Richard Robbins, Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism, and Allan Johnson,
Privilege, Power, and Difference, address privilege, inequality, and capitalism through sociological
and historical references. Through reading and analyzing these works along with our class lectures it
has become apparent that there is a clear relationship between these systems. Capitalism causes and
enforces systems of inequality and privilege. Capitalism is able to do this through the construct of
social reality, the matrix of capitalist domination: segmentation of class, gender, and race, and
through the manipulation of society by capitalistic culture.
To begin, the construct of social reality in a capitalist system reinforces systems of inequality and
privilege. This is done mainly through the creation of dominant culture. Within our society,
members are identified, classified and categorized by social characteristics. This stems from the
social construction of reality. Johnson explains this concept through sociologist's diversity wheel. It
examines ones' race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, abilities, age, religion, relationships,
education and much more to create a generic identity for a person based on what society deems as
reality and significant (14). An example of this is the construct of Irish immigrant's identity in
society. Although their physical characteristic was of fair skin, the social reality deemed and
identified them as non–white through the construct

Capitalism And The Global North And South
The interdisciplinary nature of Rethinking Capitalism has demonstrated that a seemingly simple
subject, such as capitalism, is very complex due to both its ubiquitous nature and a multitude of
affects that transcend multiple disciplines. On the one hand, capitalism is an economic system that is
rooted in the creation and exchange of commodities. On the other hand, capitalism is also a legal
system that protects commerce and enforces private property laws. Yet, capitalism can also be
defined by its historical record of uneven economic development between the Global North and
South. And still others may wish to view capitalism through a purely financial lens, in light of the
recent Great Recession. Neither of these views are particularly right, nor are they particularly
wrong, as capitalism is both all of these things and none of these things at the same. Moreover, the
effects of capitalism across these different subject matters are also open to interpretation, making it
even more difficult to assign meaning to this subject. President John F. Kennedy's aphorism of "a
rising tide lifts all boats" demonstrates that capitalism brings positive economic outcomes to
everyone, while Karl Marx's Capital painstakingly details its deleterious effects upon the laboring
classes. While the nature of the debate on defining capitalism is beyond the scope of this paper, it is
worth mentioning, albeit briefly, in order to both clarify and properly situate its central thesis; that

The Corporate American Model Of Capitalism
Capitalism is good. In reading the articles, it seems scholars are either pro or anti–capitalism. The
corporate American model of capitalism is built upon free enterprise and encourages competition.
It's also called the Liberal/Social Democratic model. Our economy, supposedly, encourages and
rewards competition and equality. Yet the lack of competition and equality in our economy are
issues scholars take aim at the most. George (2013) wrote in his editorial, "In the United States,
income inequality has escalated since the 1970s while millions of workers and their families are
suffering the devastation of long–term unemployment or work that is insecure and unstable....That
is, the tenets of American corporate capitalism (ACC) might be in contradiction to compassionate
organizing. ACC is an ideology that emphasizes, among other things, the pursuit of self–interest,
competition, market exchange, consumerism, and using a profit/loss criterion to make decisions in
organizations (George, J. 2013)." I'm pro–capitalism and I understand the views of those who are
anti–capitalism. Capitalism is an economic system which allows private and corporate ownership of
capital goods; investments that are controlled and determined by privately owned entities; pricing,
production and distribution of goods in a competitive free market. Adam Smith is considered the
Father of Capitalism and he described capitalism as a system with an invisible hand that would
maintain the markets without government

The Five Components Of Capitalism In The Global Economy
At the end of the eighteenth century, with the rise of the enlightenment and the industrial revolution
came the development of the capitalist economy. As mercantilism faded with the developments of
the industrial revolution, capitalism, a new economic system developed. Capitalism is a system in
which the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth are controlled chiefly by
private property owners who are free to seek profits in competitive conditions. Capitalism can be
broken down into five functional components; self–interest, private property, division of labor,
competition, and the invisible hand. Each component is an integral aspect of capitalism both at its
inception and in our contemporary global economy.
Self–interest is an important aspect of capitalism because individuals have the power of free choice.
Individuals have the ability choose their career and pursue their own interests. This idea is
revolutionary because the entire system of capitalism is based on individuals who choose what they
want to pursue as a means to secure profits. With each person choosing their own path to profit, it is
logical to assume that the system would fail. Too many people would choose certain jobs and not
enough would choose others leaving gaps in the system and not enough of certain goods or services.
Yet the system continues to function because the industries with not enough workers would attract
people from other more populated fields. Smith illustrates the presence of this system as "it is not
from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from
our regard to their self–interest" (Smith). Smith argues that individuals do not work merely to serve
others but rather work in order to make profits and that this system motivates people to perform
necessary tasks for which society is willing to pay.
This system of self motivation for profit is fundamental to capitalism, yet it entails certain costs. A
system focused on profit and self–interest can contribute to practices which maximize profit at the
expensive of others. Actions like reducing wage of laborers or increasing automation, negatively
impact workers but can increase profits. These practices also

Capitalism And The Need For Rebellion And Protest
National University
Melodee Stewart
HIS 320
Capitalism and the Need
For Rebellion and Protest
The culture of capitalism emerged from 1450–1930, is defined as, "culture of capitalism as sets of
relations between capitalists, laborers, and consumers, each depending on the other, yet each placing
demands on, and often conflicting with, the others" (Robbins). The culture of capitalism is based on
the production and sale of commodities. This society and culture function with dedication to the idea
that trade and consumption are the ultimate source to obtain a fulfilled life. Societies were
transforming and the creation of the consumer, the role of the laborer, the rise of the capital
controller and the creation of the nation state brought forth the the new global economic system and
culture. The culture of capitalism spread like wildfire, affecting many different components of
society. The effect it has on the different components of society can be seen in the greater social and
economic inequalities, exploitation of the periphery, environmental destruction, and the spread of
disease. These components breed rebellion and protest are still edemic. The culture of capitalism has
created problems and for the majority of the problems turns a blind eye, despite the rebellions and
protests. The current road we are on can not last. The inequalities are continuing to grow, we have
mass environmental destruction, over–consumption, and the spread of disease all need to be
addressed and

Capitalism And Free Market Capitalism
For this assignment we are asked to explain free market capitalism. First of all, capitalism has its
own meaning while free market does too. Capitalism defines as an economic system based on
ownership of factors of produce (Nickolas, 2017). The primary tactics of capitalism is when the
owners compete with one another along with motivates a general profit by its private owner without
any outside companies interference of outside sale forces (Nickolas, 2017).
Free market plays a role by producing and pricing the products/services. Basically, this is what free
market is all about! Free market is an economic system that you use strictly for supply and demand
with or without the small aspects of government regulations. In this process, generally the buyer and
the seller makes deals freely and only when coming to an agreement on the price of a product and or
service.
Capitalism is the center of interest to create wealth. Also, too, fabricate gains ownerships of capital
and factors of producing versus to free market. Free Market also '''focuses""' on wealth, products,
and services. One requirement of capitalism is that it requires a free market economic system to
bring in success. If a free market follow and adhere to all regulations it can potentially become one
of the most unique agents of collective human progress.
The United States has fully lived up to John Kenneth Galbraith's observation half a century ago that
modern U.S. capitalism generates "private wealth" and "public squalor (Foster et al.,
2017).Capitalism has served us enormously well. Yet while it has helped to reduce global poverty
and expand access to health care and education, it has come at an enormous cost: unsustainable
levels of public and private debt, excessive consumerism, and, frankly, too many people who are left
behind. Any system that prevents large numbers of people from fully participating or excludes them
altogether will ultimately be rejected. And that's what you see happening. People are asking, "What
are we doing here? (McKinsey & Company, 2017).
Creative Capitalism is a systematic approach to government businesses (Nickolas, 2017). In which,
it is a nonprofit organization that works as a team to broaden market shifts. In this

Summary Of Michael Jordan And The New Global Capitalism
In the novel, "Michael Jordan and the New Global Capitalism", the author, Walter LaFerber
compares the co–founder of Nike, Phil Knight, to former American magnates such as John D.
Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and various other industrialists in order to successfully label him as a
modern day "Robber Baron".
The comparisons between Knight and earlier moguls comprise a large part of the novel. It began
when Knight realized the opportunity he had when Michael Jordan began to become a more visible
figure in the sports world. Like many successful entrepreneurs before him, Knight quickly latched
on to the star and began promoting his product in a way that could reach a multitude of people, and
advertise his athletic products in a way that would cause them to sell in great numbers, "Nike was
steamrolling its competitors out of the market. The first step had been ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In a sense, this can be compared to the way in which Robber Barons before Knight saw
opportunities in the market, and quickly jumped on them in order to maximize their profit, and push
competitors to the wayside. Furthermore, Knight did not simply stop with signing the "most visible"
athletes, in order to steadily push his competition further out of the way he went on to sign entire
teams, "He signed not just individual stars, but entire colleges. These schools, famous for their
sports teams, promised to use Nike equipment nearly exclusively in return for large sums of money"
(65). Knights' tactics in "steamrolling" the competition are comparable to the way Rockefeller
formed Standard Oil which put other such companies out of

Analysis Of Everett Zhang 's Impotence Epidemic
Impotence and Seafaring
Understanding global economic forces in the production of a perceived "masculinity crisis" sheds
important light on the ways in which contemporary Chinese men seeking treatment for impotence
and Filipino seafarers construct themselves as modern masculine subjects. As their respective
economies become more globalized, the modern perception of masculinity changes for both the
Chinese men and Filipino seafarers. Through his book Impotence Epidemic, Everett Zhang shows
how global economic factors change men's perception on being modern. First, this is shown through
Chinese men seeking a cure for impotence through the drug Viagra, which has been pushed out via
the global market. Viagra also creates a sense of modern masculinities for men who take Viagra and
traditional remedies. Secondly, Zhang shows that with a more global economic market in China, as
well as the newly renovated capitalistic system, perceptions of impotence are evolving. Capitalism
has changed men's views on impotence, but has increased impotence rates as well. Next, in Filipino
Crosscurrents, Kale Fajardo shows how Filipino seafarers working in the context of a globalized
economy have shaped their views on masculinity and modernity. First, time–space compression in
contemporary society has shaped how men perceive themselves as modern. Second, the way men
have to suppress their masculinity while working on international ships despite being considered
masculine and heroic back home,

Historical And Contextical Roots Of The Political Economy...
Some historical and theoretical roots of the political economy of communication
The political economy of communication (PEC) has its roots in moral and political philosophers that
have established the foundations of political economy's field, such as Adam Smith, Karl Marx, or
J.S. Mill. Nevertheless, later interpreters have narrowed their works to their contributions to the field
of economics, ignoring not only the political aspects of their inquiries, but also the moral
foundations of their intellectual enterprises. In other words, classical moral philosophers at the core
of political economy were originally committed to disentangling the scope and implications of
social structures organizing human life, regarding normative as well as practical ways of social
distribution of power and access to resources. However, instead of acknowledging their broader
trajectories as philosophers, the field has later labeled them just as economists, at the same time
economy has turned into a "science", spreading its technocratic dogma.
Indeed, in his well–known overview of the field of the PEC, Mosco (2009) describes a genealogy
situating its starting point in the political economy of the 18th century, grounded upon the work of
those moral philosophers. By that time, thinkers such as Adam Smith were engaged in making sense
and promoting capitalism's acceleration, tradition that finds echo in its 20th century versions that
celebrate the growth of communication industries. Indeed, the

The Global Forces Of Capitalism Essay
Taking 'you' to mean citizens in contemporary society, this essay will argue that the global forces of
capitalism have immense powers over the government and the people. These forces transcend the
sovereignty of individual nation states through corporations, currency and the stock market, and thus
over societies and their people. According to Terrence Ball, power is a "contingently contested
concept" (Ball 1993: 556), therefore I will address power in terms of its definitions by Peter
Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz in its 'second dimension', that of setting the agenda (Bachrach and
Baratz 1962). Next, Steven Lukes' 'third dimension', which explains how the power of non–
observable conflict alters the wants of those it exercises power over, with this not being in their true
interest (Lukes 2005: 25). Subsequently, I will turn the attention to Michel Foucault's definition of
power as a "multiplicity of force relations" (Foucault 1978: 92) and its link with Hannah Arendt's
argument that power is sustained by the masses (Arendt, in Ball 1993: 549). These ideas are not the
same but, in terms of capitalism, similarities can be drawn, which suggests not only that capitalism
exerts power, but that this power is accepted. I will contest this view under the argument of 'false
consciousness', first coined by Friedrich Engels (Augoustinos 1999). Collectively, these definitions
will provide the foundations for a full analysis of how capitalism has the most power over present–
day society.

Imperialism And Consumerism
Imperialism as a driving force behind the structures of capitalism and consumerism has stood as an
extremely powerful tool taken on by many influential economic world powers. The occidentalist
concept of importing goods for consumption from less developed peripheral nations, in recent
history, has become a concept with heavy influence. This idea of creating a production dichotomy
has become foundational to the modern and increasingly connected world and its means of efficient
production by trade; unfortunately, this often results in imperialistic oppression to exacerbate this
neoliberal concept's effects of efficiency and productivity. To have maximum possible efficiency
output, workers in developing nations under capitalist forces are ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Capitalism as a concept has mainly gained traction in modern, industrial societies due to its nature
of being able to remain stable in times of economic instability– whether because of lack of
resources, tension between two trade competitors, or otherwise– and therefore remain a dominant
economic force (Global Capitalism: Imperialism, Corporate Repression, Autonomism and Direct
Action, 2010). As a dominant force, other varying economic structures have mainly given way to the
rise of capitalist trade–focused economies (Global Capitalism: Imperialism, Corporate Repression,
Autonomism and Direct Action, 2010). Accumulating capital, the main goal of capitalist production
and consumption, requires an output of productivity and efficiency from those who produce the
means of acquiring capital; this often ends up creating an image in which those who acquire the
most capital rely on workers to produce goods in order to profit (Global Capitalism: Imperialism,
Corporate Repression, Autonomism and Direct Action, 2010). To meet this demand, capitalists rely
on a reserve army of workers, the surplus of workers that overpowers the demand for workers
(Akitu, 2002). Often, despite the working class present in nations accounting for an overwhelming
percentage of national population statistics, those in power demand productivity through repression
of personal freedoms by working within

Analysis Of Capitalism: Are We Perpetually Stuck With...
Daniela de Souza
Capitalism: Are We Perpetually Stuck with Global Warming? Capitalism and the United States
monetary system refuse to productively reduce the increasing rise of climate change for reasons that
benefit only a small amount of profit holders. Malm's Fossil Capital argues that the historic methods
of capitalism have constructed a system of labor industries that current capitalists now benefit from
with the aid of the dualism of power an increasing profit. On Malm's account, dualism of power can
is defined as capitalism having literally power of the use of natural resources for the means of
production and power over laborers and people to produce and demand the product. Dualism of
power aids in capitalist control over both people ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What pushes capitalism to desire perpetual growth? To understand what capitalism thrives off of
today, Bjerg's concepts of desire and drive must be introduced. Desire is understood as a demand
and a need for an object, feeling, or emotion. This concept of desire is not a tangible object, but it is
the fuel to every human's action and thoughts. To clarify, every human being is a social animal that
longs for a need that can only be met by a demand for the specific object, whether the object is food
or a compassionate relationship. Desire arises in the transition between needs and demands– desire
is embedded in the human thought process and is an individual characteristic that each person is
ingrained with. Although, desire, in Bjerg's discussion, is a sense of false pleasure towards an object
that does not have a true reality, but is envisioned in fantasy that has the possibility of never being
obtained. The application of Bjerg's theory of desire proposes a perspective on that can further
explain why dualism of power occurs within the economic system. To explain this reasoning, it is
understood that capitalists desire more economic growth that is fulfilled through the use of natural
resources and laborers that are under the power of capitalism. Desire, essentially, is

The Pros And Cons Of Democratic Capitalism
"Democratic capitalism has three unequalled strengths. It is the only system that achieves both
economic growth and individual freedom, and it adapts to the many diverse cultures in the world...
Democracy works to remove the most common criticism of capitalism that it generates inequality in
income distribution." (Metzer, 1995)
Capitalism is the only economic system that allows people to have freedom and growth in most
areas in their lives. I begin with the statement because the heart of capitalism rests on the
entrepreneur's right to produce what he or she desires and the consumer's right to choose what to
buy. Therefore Capitalism places the ownership of the means of producing goods and services in the
hands of individuals (Metzer, 1995). The allocation of physical and human capital is based on
individual decisions. Power is dispersed thus making this system work perfectly with democracy in
which everyone gets one vote ensuring equal power politically whatever their race, political views
and gender. This has caused most individuals to contribute to a productive economic system,
seeking to do or make something that others will pay for, or they will work for an organization that
makes products or provides services that are purchased and used by others. We have concluded that
having the desire to have the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With the outbreak of World War I, the dominant role in capitalism passed to the United States,
coincident with the emergence of changes in the structure and functioning of capitalism. These
changes were to culminate, after the Great Depression of the 1930s in the United States, in more
important alterations that placed a period to old–style capitalism. The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917
had already ushered in the present era of hostile competition between modified capitalism and
collectivist economic and political systems.

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Stephen Bannon's Speech
Stephen Bannon's speech also seemed to be stemmed in the fear of change. He believes that the
cultural globalization of the world return to the same leadership as the end of the Victorian era. At
this time, the socioeconomic rules of the Church of England and the Catholic Church set the world
standard for trade, globalization, and technology transfer. With that came the cultural influences of
the Christian Faith spreading across the world. Bannon claims that ever since that has changed, the
world has become a barbaric place. Stating that, "We're children of Barbarity. This will be looked at
almost as the new dark age." Similar to the clergy, Bannon uses historical events such as World War
II and interprets the fighting between countries as the fight between the Judeo–Christian West and
atheists. Bannon declares Judeo–Christian ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It kind of organized and built the materials needed to support, whether it's the Soviet Union,
England, the United States, and eventually to take back continental Europe and to beat back a
barbaric empire in the Far East." (pg.2)
Now although some of his rhetoric may seem outlandish and outdated, Bannon's fear of the current
state of modern global economics holds some merit. He fears that the Ayn Rand (also know as the
Objectivist School of Libertarian Capitalism) form of capitalism is making humans into
commodities. Essentially he is talking about neo–liberalism and the global commodity chain as the
most volatile form of capitalism. But, his fear of the global commodity chain isn't purely driven by
the fear that people are becoming commodities, it is driven through the fact that modern
socioeconomics

Do Marx 's Views On Capitalism Provide Any Insights Into...
Do Marx 's views on capitalism provide any insights into economic globalisation today?
Emma Hentschel
ID : 216152064
Do Marx 's views on capitalism provide any insights into economic globalisation today?
Globalization in one of the main driving forces within today 's modern world. It is the historical
process and transformational development in the global arena, where growth and establishment of
global connections in the international community continues to evolve. It is a widely used phrase,
that in different contexts can be used as both the cause and effect of many different things. It is
commonly used, since the fall of communism, to refer to a single world economy, where
international trade and commerce is borderless. Additionally it can be employed to define the
growing integration of the international capitalist system in the post–war period. Economic
globalization specifically is defined as the transnational increase in trade and capital transfers across
national boundaries. Economic globalisation today, is a complex beast. The intricate system relies
upon the interconnected expansion of cooperation between; Transnational Corporations (TNCs),
Nation States, Non–Governmental Organizations (NGO) and more. The theory of globalism, that
there is a growing collective awareness of the world as a shared social space, and the advancement
of the global political arena where; the politics of international social relations are used in the
pursuit of power, national

Essay on Marx, Weber and their Critique of Global Capitalism
While Marx and Weber had divergent analyses of capitalism, their evaluations of modern global
capitalism have a common thread of thought. They both view the implementation of global
capitalism, where subordinating individual needs and desires to achieve the end goal of
accumulating wealth for wealth's sake, as irrational and unreasonable. Because of that commonality,
it is feasible to draw from both analyses to explain global capitalization today.
Karl Marx believed that the ultimate end of society is an imminent and significant, consisting of
happiness, which can only be achieved via organized collectivism. Reality is controlled by financial
necessity (historical materialism). In practical application, this theory means that the ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
97). While Marx sees capitalism purely from economic need, Weber states that capitalism is a
combination of economic, political and social strata. Weber's analysis indeed had a similar scope to
Marx, not surprising as he came from the same German tradition of thought and faced many of the
same issues as Marx. But Weber examined issues which Marx marginalized – in particular, the
influence organized religion had on the incarnation of capitalism. Weber was less passionate, more
scholarly, not viewing classes of people, but rather the individual within a very structured approach.
Marx believed that "religion was the opiate of the people" (Marx, 1). Marx viewed capitalism as a
form of religion, where the worship of wealth and capital replaced the traditional worship of a deity.
"The more a worker estranges himself in his labour, the more estranged, objective world he has
created becomes more powerful, while he becomes impoverished...The same happens in religion.
The more man puts things in God, the less he keeps in himself." (Marx, pp. 57–58)
Weber, conversely, felt that capitalism had its roots in the Protestant Work Ethic, based upon the
concept that the Calvinist emphasis on hard work and diligence was a person's way of fulfilling
one's duty to God. The resultant accumulation of wealth was a reassurance of one's predestined
Salvation. By the time Weber wrote "The Protestant Ethic

Capitalism : The Highest Stage Of Capitalism
Since Vladimir Lenin was a Marxist and socialist he was opposed to global capitalism, and his book
of Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism points out some of his main arguments regarding
the capitalism as a whole. He regarded World War 1 as an imperialist war, caused by pressures that
arose from an immediate development of several European empires. The central nations of
capitalism participated to expand their exploitative sphere, which led to the conflict of interests and
eventually produced the Great War . Although in Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism,
Lenin characterized capitalism as a source of gaining the great profit, a closer reading of his
narrative suggest that capitalism leads to a class exploitation by maximization of power, and total
control of the economic system. The key to understanding the effect of capitalism and the power
control can be seen in Lenin's concentration of production and monopolies, which he described in
his book. He believed that monopoly was a switch from capitalism to a higher system, and based on
Marx's law of concentration the market supremacy in capitalism belongs to a few cartels, syndicate
and trusts, and emerging capital of banks that handle the thousands of millions. In addition to this,
cartels, syndicates and trusts divide among themselves the whole internal market of a particular
country, and enact their control that gives them a various power over the society and whole system.
And concentration goes further

Compare And Summary : Socialism And Free Market Capitalism
Capitalism & Free Market Capitalism To understand free market capitalism, you first have to know
what the root word means. Capitalism is an economic system where a business or private person(s)
owns capital goods. Supply and demand drive the production of services and goods. Rather than
supply and demand be based on central planning (planned economy or command economy), it is
conducted through the general market also known as, market economy. When a private person(s) is
completely unrestricted in figuring out where to invest, what prices to exchange services and goods,
operating without controls and checks, and what to produce or sell, it is free market capitalism or
laissez. Free market capitalism is the purest form of capitalism. In most modern countries a mixed
capitalism system of some sort is practiced and include government regulation of industry and
business. Creative Capitalism Creative capitalism is the notion of problems that are usually assigned
to government or
Nonprofits be expanded into capitalism. This means that big global corporations should expand into
"doing good" into the way they conduct business without sacrificing their own business needs.
Creative Capitalism is important to a large array of people interested in advancing social causes such
as hunger, clean water, poverty, disease, and access to medication, using corporations. Creative
capitalism can address
the

The Implication Of Free Markets On Global Business
The implication of free markets on global business Introduction
Capitalism, socialism, and communism are the main three economic systems. "Capitalism is an
economic system also known as the private enterprise or free market system based on private
ownership, economic freedom, and fair competition" (Kelly and Williams pp. 26) Capitalism can be
referred to as free markets where there is no government intervention or strict regulations. The
principle of capitalism is that "people and business must free to buy or not to buy according to their
wishes. They must be free to choose where to work or not to work and where to live" (Kelly and
Williams pp. 27). Productivity, economic growth, and high quality of goods and services are some
of the implications of free markets on nations and global business.
Main Body
Capitalism is based on many principles. Fair competition is one of the principles that Capitalism
provides. Since Capitalism provides free competition, monopoly does not exist in capitalist
countries. Free competition means many competitors providing to consumers many goods and
services. That leads to the fact that high quality of products will be available in the markets due to
the fair competition.
The United States, Canada, Australia, France, and Switzerland are some of the capitalist countries. It
can be noticed that most of the products in world today are from these countries. Such as, cars,
technology, and machines. As a result, the system of those countries has

Civil Disobedience: Fight Against Free Trade Global...
Civil disobedience is an illegal act made by one or by a group of people to make a point and taking
full responsibility for the act when they have to face consequences. For example, a man named José
Bové was a French sheep farmer who was an alter–globalization activist. He was sentenced to three
months and served 44 days for destruction of a Mcdonald's being built in Millau, Aveyron, France.
He was jailed from June 19th to August 4th, 2001. The reason José has done such a thing was to
save the small farmers around where he lives and doesn't agree with junk food. When he explained
why he did it, he said, "this is a fight against free trade global capitalism. It's about the logic of a
certain economic system, not an American system. It could ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
José and his advocates warned the police that they would be dismantling the McDonald's, the police
told them that they would ask the McDonald's manager to put up a billboard or something similar to
demolish. They thought the idea was ludicrous and demolished the McDonald's anyway. The public
supported them, a petition went around since everyone supported ewe's milk producers, hundreds of
people signed. José said he didn't want Mcdonald's to be seen as the prime target. "It's merely a
symbol of economic imperialism." When Bové and his comrades got out of prison, they held a press
conference in Paris and 500 people gathered at the Larzac to celebrate. The people who signed the
petition were invited by the support committee. Also that day. A smaller gathering was put together
by the National Committee of Farmers' Confederation, who welcomed Bové and his comrades into
their headquarters. Those people have struggled to free José and his helpers for three consecutive
weeks. They had kept up the fight and gave them renewed energy to continue spreading their

Global Problems And The Culture Of Capitalism By Richard...
Richard Robbins explores and analyzes the creation and the upkeep of hunger in his book "Global
Problems and the Culture of Capitalism. Each day, over a billion people in the world lack basic food
needs. Common misunderstandings about world hunger are that it is the result of insufficient food
production, famine is the common reason for hunger and that hunger is caused by overpopulation.
Robbins argues against that theory and says that famines is not the leading cause of hunger and
hunger is not due to overpopulation or insufficient food production. "Food production is not
determined by the global need for food; it is determined on how many people have the means for it"
(page 176). The documentary "The End of Poverty" reinforces Robbins belief that food is a
commodity. A common misconception is that hunger is caused by a scarcity of food. People are
hungry because they don't have the money for food, not because there is a lack of it. Food is a
commodity. Robbins explains that the availability of food no longer depends on the farmer's ability
to produce it but also on people's wages, food prices and a place for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The film gives out statistics and personal experiences/interviews showing how deep poverty is on a
global scale. 800 Million people suffer from malnutrition, and a third of the word doesn't have
access to water. The documentary examines the question "in a world with so much wealth why is
there so much poverty?" Colonialism has been described and developed throughout history in many
different forms. Colonialism is a policy by which a nation maintains or extends its control over
foreign dependencies. The imperial powers stole from the indigenous people land, their resources,
killed their people and imported millions of slaves. Colonialism created economies that were under
the power of the

Capitalism And Communism Similarities
Despite bearing many differences, communism and capitalism have a few similarities. I chose to
compare capitalism and communism because they are the two most popular economic systems in the
world. The definition of capitalism is an economic and political system in which a country's trade
and industry are controlled for profit rather than by the state. The definition of communism is a
political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all
property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.
The main similarities between the two are both of them must participate in global markets, both
involve the use of state and or private property, and both use incredible amounts of violence to
destroy their opposition and enforce their system.
In the capitalist economic system there is little to no government interference when it comes to
many things, especially business and they stand with private property. While in the communist
economic system the government controls mostly everything and they are against private property.
If you think about it, the republican political party has more capitalist views because they believe
that the government should stay out of private ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Another similarity between the capitalist and communist economic systems is that they both use
state/private property, they use this property for either military, science, and/or business purposes. A
third similarity between the communist and capitalist economic system is that they both use
incredible amounts of force to destroy their opposition and enforce their system. Some examples
being the Vietnam War, the Korean War, and the entire Cold War was over which economy could get
the most nukes and which could get into space

Adam Smith And Karl Marx
Adam Smith and Karl Marx were two economic philosophers who each introduced revolutionary
ideas concerning economic systems, and their effect upon social progress and prosperity. Smith
proposed an economic system, known as capitalism, in which a laborer 's wage is wholly relative to
their contribution to increasing the means of production; productivity is capitalism 's main objective,
as it inevitably results in increased profit and revenue. Conversely, Marx proposed an economic
system, known as communism, which advocates for the equal distribution of wealth among the
owners of the means of production, and their laborers, in an effort to stimulate fair and sustainable
wages.
A hypothetical situation arises in which, Western nations show interest in the valuable natural
resources of a Pacific island, inhabited by people who have already established their own economic
system and patriarchal social norms. Concerning the economic welfare of the inhabitants, the
potential value of the resources, and the wealth of the newly discovered nation, Marx and Smith
would respond to the situation with the same conclusion: the inhabitants should not allow Western
nations to access and capitalize upon their natural resources. Although both philosophers agree
about discouraging external influences upon the island 's economic structure, the motivating factors
behind each 's decisions differ. Smith would discourage external influences in favor of the
inhabitants capitalizing upon their natural

Global Capitalism And Its Impact On The United States
It is not just the arbitrary concepts of capitalism which have a tendency to expand, under the Marxist
understanding of the state, capitalist states will make foreign policy decisions for the benefit of
global capitalism. The increased intervention by western states in the Marxist view is about the sole
purpose of the expansion of capitalism in the search of profit for the companies, using the state as a
mobiliser for action towards such an end. Mark Rupert brought forward a case study of such
"imperialism" in action, in the case of the US. Global capitalist activities require huge amounts of
energy, and the cheapest or most efficient form is petroleum. Despite not being a democracy and not
practising equality, or respecting human rights, all core values to the US, Saudi Arabia remains one
of the US's closest allies. If the actions of the US abroad primarily concerned democracy promotion,
human rights and core liberal values, this alliance does not make sense, but when you use a Marxist
lens, and consider that alliances are about capitalism, you quickly understand why Saudi Arabia, a
large producer of oil is a huge geopolitical ally of the US. This also applies to explaining enemies,
for example Cuba and Qaddafi's Libya. Cuba on the one hand is one of the few countries which still
ideologically rejects capitalism as a form of organising society, which has resulted in a ban on all
trade with Cuba. Alternatively, Qaddafi, who was the leader of an oil rich Libya for many years

Global Capitalism Controversy
Personally, controversies in global capitalism is one of the most interesting that I have taken so far.
After the first module which comprised of different topics, including topic 1 was about introduction:
The politics of the global economy, topic 2 was about the history of the world economy, topic 3 was
about neo–liberalism & global capitalism and topic 4 was about protesting global capitalism.
However, topic 1 was the most remarkable topic in my opinion because it gave me the basic
understanding about capitalism and the reasons behind its controversies. There were two readings
that I found interested, including 'Is Modern Capitalism Sustainable?' by Rogoff and chapter 1
'Introduction: The politics of the global economy' by O'Brien and Williams.

Marx Theory Of Reserve Army Of Labour
, rather than reducing migration, economic development increases migration. Marx theory of reserve
army of labour is central to what he has to say about capitalism and workers wages; the proletariat.
Most migrants in society today migrate to the US and end up working in factories where they
manage machinery. Marx theory illustrates how capitalist industries consists of two parts – the
machinery and the workers. Capitalist industries expand by sukingin their workers to operate the
machinery, upping their wages and attracting more of them. By doing so the worker is necessary to
satisfy the needs of the machinery, rather than industry existing to satisfy the worker's need. This
process illustrates how capitalism exploits workers for their labour. Yet migration provides the
capitalist industry with a wide array of wage–labour. Scholar Jeff Manza explains how higher pay
depends on whether or not the product is profitable for the capitalist who owns the machinery to
employ workers to operate. Marx draws the conclusion that capitalism is the first economic system
in which there can be too many workers, with a large sum coming from migration as migrants are in
search of economic development.
The influx of migrants to the US continues to create a class of uneducated proletarians who remain
unconscious of their role in unpaid labour. Immigrants become the primary source of cheap labour.
migrant labour has become manipulated in the world markets by successful capitalist countries,

Situating Global Capitalism Karen Ho
public, according to anthropologists these behaviours are justified through their own moral values
and social practices – (which are ultimately determined by capitalism). Many anthropologists have
studied Wall Street extensively, and they can corroborate the negative view mentioned throughout
this essay. Their work has also shed light onto the manner in which Wall Street workers view one–
another. In her research paper "Situating Global Capitalism", anthropologist Karen Ho notes how
the financial markets continue to regulate themselves by means of neoliberal capitalism. She speaks
of how institutions such as Wall Street seek to exploit the government to gain financial control of the
economy, in which existing assists of the economy are used

Article Review On Capitalism And Capitalism
Caleb Wilson
Essay on Capitalism
Instructors: Christel Smith, Kurt Banzhaf, and
Kayla Colfack
English 12 and American Government
April 12, 2015
CAPITALISM !1
It has been around since the Middle Ages, that we know of, and most likely before that.
It is usually the first type of economy before evolving into another kind. Its main sources of life are
competition and an ever changing society. This almost living breathing creature of our own device is
called capitalism. Capitalism has been the biggest form of economy in the United
States and now throughout the world. Prosperity is usually following right behind because of all the
money produced, people employed, growth occurring, and overall well being a society experiences.
Although great, capitalism has its down falls, like monopolies. We as an American society trust that
the government will monitor, not just monopolies, but the other areas neglected by capitalism.
Although the government has done a great job, they have, in a way, over stepped their bounds and
have been slowly putting their hands on the throat of the beast we call capitalism. America should
promote capitalism and not restrict it. With competition from other forms of government and
countries, America needs all the help it can get to remain a world power. First, the rise of capitalism
is astounding and mesmerizing. Second, the reasons why capitalism is so beneficial and a boon to
society. Third, how restrictions, spending, and taxes are making a capitalistic

Research Paper On 21st Century Capitalism
21st Century Capitalism
21st Century Capitalism. By Robert Heilbroner. (New York: Norton, 1993. 175pp., $17.95)
The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. By Robert Reich. (New
York: Vintage, 1992. 339pp., $14.00)
Undoubtedly, the 20th century has witnessed some of the most significant economic events in
modern history. For example, the Great Depression saw capitalism come close to its end, and the
principles of laissez–faire repudiated as the New Deal was enacted to rehabilitate the economy.
More recently, the downfall of the Soviet Union represented a major victory for capitalism over the
now–defunct communist system, which is nearing extinction even in the land of Mao, as China
reluctantly and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Command necessitates orders from some authority and is based on some enforcement mechanism.
Some examples of peoples who lived in Command societies are the Romans under the emperors, the
Egyptians under the pharaohs, and Stalinist Russia.
The purpose of this analysis is to arrive at the concept of the Market, fundamental to the workings of
capitalism. The Market system involves each individual doing what he or she pleases, without any
instructions or directions from above. The theory goes that any shortages or excesses will be
alleviated since the market is above all, self–correcting.
Central to capitalism is the drive for capital, to which Heilbroner devotes an entire chapter. He goes
to great lengths to differentiate between capital and wealth. "Capital is wealth whose value does not
inhere in its physical characteristics but in its use to create a larger amount of capital". (Heilbroner
46) Thus, capital is valued because of its ability to increase itself, while wealth is relatively static.
Another superb aspect of Heilbroner's work is his ability to interweave the words of other great
economists

Domestic And Foreign Economic Policy
Research Question: The way states interact with each other effects not only their domestic economy
but the global economy. What is the best method for states to approach the global market; should
states accept the capitalist free market or utilize different models that are out there?
Purpose Statement:
The way that states approach the global market is very different from each other. Most of the biggest
and successful economies in the world utilize similar economic models when addressing the global
market. Their domestic and foreign economic policy is typically modeled after the capitalist
approach. United States is a prime example of a nation that has implemented the capitalism
approach and has been a leader in the free market trade. An opposite example is China who uses a
modified Marxism approach with a twist in their foreign economic concept utilizing a modified
controlled capitalism approach. It is important for states to have a full understanding on how the
global economy works in order to figure out what economic model will work for them to be
contenders in the global market. Since every state has its own unique characteristics economically
and politically there will not be a one fits all approach. Each state needs to define its own economic
and political agenda so they can settle on a type of approach that would work for them. If the need
to the can modify an approach to suit their needs. The global market is a complex network of trade
relations between

Globalization In The Four Horseman

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Kelley Hunter

More from Kelley Hunter (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Globalization In The Four Horseman