Election Day Rises And The Electoral College System

Election Day Rises And The Electoral College System
As election day rises, so does significant questions surrounding the Electoral College system.
Mainly the subject of whether or not to disband the system will again be a hot topic amongst voters
and legislatures. The question that remains in the minds of the everyday voter is if their vote actually
counts toward appointing a President when a system such as the Electoral College is in place.
Nevertheless, before forming an opinion on the matter it is important that one consider what the
Electoral College actually is and how it functions, furthermore understanding why the framers of the
Constitution thought it necessary to create this system. To properly form an opinion, avenues of
critics and supporters must both be explored. Only through this considerable amount of information
gathered can you take a stance on the topic. Rooted in Article II section I of the constitution, the
electoral college is a system put in place to delegate the Presidency. The Electors that comprise the
electoral college are 435 House of representative members 100 senators along with 3 electors
appointed from the the District of Columbia, for a total of 538. To win the the Presidency a
Candidate must receive 270 votes from the electoral college, the number of electoral votes a state
has varies based on population and the representation the State has in Congress. Appointed Electors
are voted into the position by popular demand, nevertheless regardless of their states popular vote
toward a particular
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Electoral College For Presidential Election System
Throughout the years, whenever a policy has seemed outdated or irrelevant in US policy, it has
generally been gotten rid of. Slavery, prohibition, and discriminate voting laws were all done away
with once people realized that they did not belong in the modern world, but there is still one piece of
US policy that has long overstayed its welcome. This piece of policy is the use of the electoral
college in our presidential election system. The electoral college is a group of individuals who each
cast a direct vote for the president. The way that this works is complicated but essentially it boils
down to this. Each state has a number of electoral college votes equal to the number of seats they
have in the senate plus the number of seats they have in the House of Representatives for a total of
538 votes. Before each election, each party picks a group of people who they tell to vote for their
candidate from each state to be their electors. When a citizen votes for president in November of
election years, they are not voting for the president directly. They are voting for which party gets to
send its group of electors to cast their vote in the electoral college. These electors then cast their
votes in early December, and from those votes a winner is declared. Does it seem convoluted and
overly–complicated? That is what I think. So, I say that the electoral college should be abolished
because it causes problems in presidential elections, the arguments for the electoral college are

Electoral College Essay
Beginning in America in 1787, the Electoral College was originally created during the
Constitutional Convention to help make a fair way for the president to be elected without giving too
much power to either the national government or individual states. Over the years, the Electoral
College has undergone a few changes in attempt to make it more fair, but there is still much debate
about whether or not the Electoral College is the most effective way to elect a president. Some
people believe that the Electoral College does an excellent job of creating an equal distribution of
votes across all ethnicities and social classes of America. In contrast, others think that the Electoral
College does not give an accurate portrayal of the popular ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
If the majority of Americans are voting for one president to take the power in the presidential office,
than it does not make sense that the other candidate would win the election. However, the Bush
versus Gore election was not the only time that a candidate with the minority of the votes to win. A
similar election occurred in 1876 between Samuel J. Tilden and Rutherford B. Hayes. The Gale
Encyclopedia of American Law states that "when the election returns came in on November 7, 1876,
Tilden had clearly received the majority of the popular votes. However... with fewer than 48 hours
before Tilden's scheduled inauguration, the commission announced that Hayes had won the
necessary electoral votes" (Gale Encyclopedia of American Law). The fact that Hayes won the
presidential election with a minority of the popular votes is purely illogical and preposterous,
because it does not accurately portray the opinions of the people. Because of the ability of a
candidate to obtain the presidential office without the majority of the votes, the Electoral College
should be abolished in America.
Another major reason why the Electoral College needs to be eliminated in America is because the
population is unevenly distributed throughout America causing presidential candidates to focus a
majority of their campaigning in specific regions and states, rather than appealing equally to the
whole country.

Electoral College System Essay examples
Analyze criticism of the "Electoral College" system and the alleged advantages and disadvantages of
various reform proposals.
The Electoral College is a system in which the individual voter does not actually vote directly for
the president. When a person votes they are voting for an elector that has pledged their vote or
allegiance to the running party. The Framers realized that without widespread communications
available at the time and with other varying factors an "each vote counts" or "the popular vote"
system would not be practical. Because of this they formed the Electoral College system, Under
Article II of the US Constitution, although this system was never called this in the Article. This
system has survived for over 200 years, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although no Elector had ever been prosecuted. Just in this century alone there have been 7 faithless
Electors, the most recent was in 1988. Even though this has happened many times, it has never
changed the outcome of the election.
Many people fear that the Electoral College may cause a decline in voter turnout. They say that
there is no incentive for states to encourage people to vote. They say that people may decline to vote
because many believe there vote does not count.
An issue that has plagued the system since its development is the inequality of Electoral votes from
small states and large states. An example would be in the 1988 election, the combined voting age
population of 3,119,000 of the seven least populous jurisdictions of Alaska, Delaware, the District of
Columbia, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming carried the same voting strength in the Electoral
College as the 9,614,000 voting age people in the State of Florida. Due to this each vote in Florida
was only about 1/3 the weight of the other states listed.
Third parties have a large disadvantage in the Electoral College system. Most states allot their
Electoral Votes that favor a tow–party system. Even if a third party candidate receives a large
amount of vote they still may not receive even on Electoral vote. This actually happened in 1992
when Ross Perot won 18% of the popular vote but did not win any Electoral votes.
There are many people that feel that the Electoral College

Electoral College System Essay
The roots of the Electoral College System can be traced way back to more than 200 years. A
controversial debate on the effectiveness of Electoral College continues over years. The founders
established it as a resolution between president choice by a vote in congress and choice of the
president by qualified citizens' popular vote. 538 electors constituted the Electoral College and 270
majorities of electoral votes choose the president. The United States got its independence from Great
Britain, and its government based on the Articles of Confederation (Burgan 9). According to Burgan,
under the article, the states acted almost like separate nations (9). It is well–known that the United
States president becomes elected by Electoral College and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The system also maintains the nations' federal character since combinations of even small states
opinions receives attention. A small portion of a very populous state cannot overshadow the
minority. The status of the minority is enhanced as they influence critical edge for candidates to
emerge victorious. Contestants get encouraged to venture into minorities through the system and not
ignore them. The College also eliminates most election problems. According to Bugh, the system
essentially assigns to the winner the votes of the people who voted against that candidate (159). He
continues that because there is no way to total votes across states, the votes for candidates who do
not win a state do not have a role in the outcome of elections (159). In–case of recounts, it occurs
only in states and not nationwide. I believe the college encourages stability via the two–party system
where regional minorities are not undermined.
The intention for the design of Electoral College appeared to choose a person that demonstrates both
popular support and a broad distribution of support. This goal becomes an achievement over the past
decades. Some critics think that voting power of smaller states gets overrepresented. They fail to
acknowledge the democratic will of all states as equal despite their low populations. Presidential
campaigns disperse

The Electoral College System
The system of electing a president was established in 1787 and it was called the Electoral College
and it is still the broken system that we use today, but it is also the best system we know because it
can stop a horrible decision. The biggest issue with electoral college is that it's not a vary democratic
system. The electors are the ones who actually vote, but they have the power to vote for who they
want in office. The voting system is a money pot and investor are willing to pay into the pot of cash
because it is the deciding factor whether the rich should pay higher taxes and in that spirit, it's worth
for the rich to invest in it. There is lobbyist in the government who can persuade any part of the
government and hired by the rich who

Electoral College: The American Voting System
The Electoral College is a very important process to the American voting system however deciding
who gets to be a part of the Electoral College is a two–step process. First, the political parties in
each state choose slates of potential Electors sometime before the general election. Second, on
Election Day, the voters in each state select their state's Electors by casting their ballots for
President.
Who makes The Electoral College? The American voting system is very confusing. Many
Americans think that their vote goes directly towards whatever election they are voting towards
however it does not. Once a person votes their vote goes toward the Electoral College. The Electoral
College is a process that the founding fathers put in place to

The Importance Of The Electoral College System
Importance of the Electoral College System Since its establishment the electoral college has always
come under fire for the way it executes the election process in the United States. Many people
believe that a direct popular vote is the best way to elect president and vice president, rather than the
indirect election process used now. Because of this conflict, the question of whether or not the
electoral college should be abolished continues to be a heated debate, especially after the most
recent presidential election. Though the electoral college system does have some flaws, like every
system does, it should not be abolished. The electoral college system should not be abolished
because it allows the smaller populated states to have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This means the candidate who wins the most votes in the state also wins the states electoral votes
and wins the state as a whole. A particular advantage to having this method with the electoral
college system is creating clear cut election winners. In the 1992 Presidential Election Bill Clinton
had 43% of the popular vote and George H.W. Bush received 37.5% of the vote creating a slim
majority winner(Doc B). Yet the electoral vote was able to show a more decisive winner in this
election. Bill Clinton with 69% and Bush with 31% of the electoral vote(Doc B). The electoral
college system is able to create more decisive elections than a direct popular vote would ever be
able to. Along with the other benefits stated above the electoral college system continues to keep the
two party system alive. The two party system allows for moderate candidates that focus on
important issues the United States faces at that moment. Because of this, it helps to dissipate the
multiplication of splinter parties and single issue ideologues(Doc E). Single issue ideologues, or
people who blindly support a particular idea or set of ideas which are encouraged through the
popular vote system, would also make it harder for a election majority winner to be named (Doc E).
The electoral college system thus allows for the two party system to continue to stay alive and
strong moderate

Argumentative Essay: The Change Of The Electoral College...
The Electoral College was created in created in 1787, though there has been lots of amendment done
since then. It was created as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress
and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. I don't agree with the opinion
that Electoral College system should be changed, rather I believe that the Electoral College system
should be amended and modified where the delegates should vote in according to what the majority
of the population in the state and district to which they represent want, these would insure that
presidential elections occur according to the democratic process, citizens should be well educated
and informed when voting for representative for the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Citizens should be given proper awareness and education concerning voting representatives for
Electoral College before they vote. If the citizens of a state prefer for democrat to run for president
then the people that they choose to represent the state should have the same views although in some
cases the Electoral College chooses candidates different from the choice of popular votes, but that
does not mean that it does not work. Some argue that the electoral college does not work, but there
has been only 4 cases since the creation of United states this equates to 93% of the time the
Electoral College ballots have reflected the consensus of the popular vote where the popular choice
of candidate for president did not get elected , for instance the election of 2000 George W. Bush won
the presidency, after weeks of controversy in Florida this made him the first President in more than
100 years to win election despite a popular vote loss, this led to calls for abolition of America's the
Electoral College, which means that the electoral college is effective and not an embarrassment.
"The Electoral College system gave individual states a key role, each state would choose electors
equal to the number of representatives it had in the house in senate." If the citizens of states
preferred for democrat to run for president then the people that they choose to represent the state
should have the same

The Electoral College System Essay
In the Electoral College system, as presented by Hamilton, every voice is heard and there is a
greater guarantee that the elected will effectively represents those voices in office. During election
season, the people in the states vote for the representatives that will make up the Electoral College.
The people within the states will votes for the prudent few that they believe best conform to their
political interests, just as they do for those voted into the House of Representatives. As a result, the
few elected representatives in each state mirror the average person within their state. The desires,
beliefs, and interests of those representatives hold the same desires, beliefs, and interests of those
within the state. The only difference is that the votes of those few would hold more weight than if
everyone in the states vote. Each representative in the Electoral College casts his vote with the
knowledge that their vote will change the course of their country and affect the lives of their fellow
countrymen. The gravity of such a responsibility would push each representative to give great
consideration into who should be elected as president. They would scrutinize over their decision,
debate the merits of each candidate, and ultimately elect one prudent man to lead the country. In
stark contrast, the process of voting in modern day America is treated with less importance than
given most mundane tasks. Today, Americans give little thought to whom they will vote for as

Electoral College System
I agree with that the Electoral College System should be done with. My reasoning for this is in any
presidential election, the Electoral College is above the votes of the people of the United States of
America. All that a candidate needs when they run for an election is 270 out of the 538 votes in the
Electoral College to win the presidency. The Electoral College System over runs the election. It
pushes aside the votes of the people and consequently decides who is going to be president for
themselves. They say that the American people have a choice in who becomes their president, but it
only takes 270 out of 538 of the Electoral College to choose the next president of the United States
of America. If the Electoral College chooses who is going to be the next president then what is the
reason for the American people to vote? There is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, in the recent presidential Election, Donald Trump won the presidential Election, but, in
fact, Hillary Clinton received more votes than Donald Trump in the Presidential Election, but
Donald Trump received more Electoral College votes than Hillary Clinton. It is shown, in fact, that
it does not matter how much the American people vote for a candidate of the presidential election; if
the Electoral College favors a candidate, they are going to win the election. If the votes of the
presidency only relies on the votes of politicians, then what is left for the American people to do. Is
there even a reason to vote.
There are also proven facts on why the Electoral College does not work. There are four major
reasons for why I dislike the Electoral College. They are the possibility of electing a minority
president,

The Electoral College Is A System
The Electoral College is a system that the founding fathers established to allow people to vote
indirectly for the president. The public does not directly vote for the president and his or her running
mate, but intern votes for a representative that has pledged to vote for a certain candidate. Once the
electoral votes have been cast, the majority winner wins the presidency. Each state gets a certain
number of electoral votes, there is a total of 538 electoral votes, and a majority of 270 votes is
required to elect the president. The number of votes each state receives are based on the sum of
Representatives in the House of Representatives and the Senate, the District of Columbia also
receives 3 electoral votes. The majority winner of the Electoral College votes wins the candidacy.
Some states have a system in place called "Winner Takes All," so if the candidate wins the popular
vote in that specific state then they win the electoral votes as well. (Soni) Winning the popular vote
does not guarantee winning the electoral votes. There has been times where a candidate has won the
popular vote, but lost the presidency, because they did not win the majority electoral votes.
The Electoral College was set up in the Constitution to establish the procedure in electing The
President of the United States. So one might ask themselves what the founding fathers reasoning
behind establishing The Electoral College. The framers did not fully trust direct democracy; the
founding fathers

The Electoral College System Essays
After the last presidential election, which is still underway apparently, there is much controversy
over what should happen to the Electoral College system. There are people who say that the
Electoral College is good but should be modified to meet the needs of the modern world. There are
those who say that the Electoral College system is too outdated to be modified and should be
entirely eliminated. Finally there are those who say that it is has stood the test of time and is still the
best system for our country.
The original framers of the constitution obviously preferred the electoral system to a direct popular
election. The argument that historians give for this is that they preferred this system ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
There have been many attempts to reform or even scrap the Electoral College election sense it's
birth. The most recent one being in 1997 when congress debated a constitutional amendment to
replace the electoral system with a direct popular vote system. However the Electoral College
system to this day remains virtually un–changed from its original form. The only exception is the
twelfth amendment, which requires each elector to cast two votes, one for president and one for vice
president.
Under the current system there are five hundred and thirty eight electors. Each state gets one elector,
each representative, and a senator. A presidential candidate needs two hundred and seventy votes to
win the election. The electors meet after the November popular election to cast their votes and
officially elect the president. Electors may vote for whomever they wish. Each state's electoral votes
are awarded on a winner take all bases.
The arguments to modify or eliminate the Electoral College system are all derived from the notion
that it is outdated. Under the current system if a candidate wins a large states like California, then
they win twenty percent of the needed votes even though California only accounts for eleven
percent of the U.S. population. What's more is a president can be elected without winning a majority
of the popular vote. This has happened 15 times in U.S. history. The

What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College System
"The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy," (Trump). During American history, there has
been a total of the five presidential candidates have won the popular vote, however, lost the electoral
college, therefore losing the campaign. When one votes in the presidential election, he or she votes
for the electors of his or her state who will choose a candidate (typically from his or her party) and
whoever gets the most votes becomes the next U.S. president (Federal Register). Thus, each state
decides what electors are sent by whatever way the state goes (Democratic or Republican), so the
candidate gets all the electoral college votes (which is based on population) or gets none of that
state's electoral college votes (Federal Register). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Electoral College has become ineffective in the twenty–first century due to the advancement in
technology and the progression in public education, allowing one to formulate a cultured opinion in
today's politics. Nevertheless, the decision to do so will positively affect the citizens and
government relations; therefore, will cause America to become more democratic, improved country.
However, if it is not abolished soon more elections, like 2000 and 2016, will occur, thus, an
increased amount of distrust between the people and the government. Nevertheless, Americans are
already divided and will result in new, larger problems in the future if the country's leader is unable
to bring his or her people together. Therefore, Electoral College is only causing problems in
America's democratic process rather than solutions that will only escalate from today

Electoral College System Analysis
Every four years the United States of America hold a nationwide election to decide the next
president. Since the beginning of the United States, there has been a public vote in which the
candidate with the popular vote wins the presidency. However over 56 elections the outcome has
differed from the popular vote 4 times. This shows a clear problem in the system the states
continuously use.
When election day begins, Americans cast their ballots for the president of the states. Except there's
a catch, they don't vote direct for the president. The system has over the years become quite
controversial because the electoral college has many flaws. The electoral college is a collection of
538 votes that determine who the president.
Why 538? Each state, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Well, rewind to the 1700s where the country was young, large and the only way to pass information
was a man on a horse. They would write a message down and hope the messenger didn't die on the
way. So, they created a system where the most powerful men in an area would join together in
Washington with the most up to date information and decide the next president. So now it makes us
wonder why would this still be in place if information can travel at lightning speeds.
People have been trying to tear apart the electoral college for years but the only people that could
dismantle such methods are the people who work there and I doubt they'd want to lose their jobs
over it.
To conclude, the Americans have baffled our ancestors with a system which allows powerful
electors to change the vote of the people but have intrigued us with their ability to save America
from itself for years– and I doubt their ways will change in the near future to a more systematic
election process. I truly believe they will never be a United state besides they'll destroy the state of
their nation beforehand

Purpose Of The Electoral College System
Why the Electoral College System
The electoral college system is a system that constantly misunderstood. Especially after this most
recent election. So understanding and explaining the history of the system itself and why the system
was created in the first place. The founding fathers established the electoral college in 1787 after
National leaders drafted the U.S. Constitution.(Bonsor & Dove,2000). Instead of setting up a
presidential election system through direct democracy, the nation's founders established the
Electoral College in part to ensure the entire nation has a more equal say in the choosing of a
national president. The purpose of the electoral college is to be a compromise between election of
the president by the vote of Congress ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also A direct popular election of the president would likely have the opposite effect. For in a direct
popular election, there would be every incentive for a multitude of minor parties to form in an
attempt to prevent whatever popular majority might be necessary to elect a president. The another
advantage of the electoral college system is that the divided Constitution has been designed into
government 3 different branches that are designed to offer "balances and checks" along with
deliberation. Otherwise when the President is directly elected he can declare a national well–known
mandate which will undermine the other branches of the government creating a

Is The Electoral College System Ever Since The World?
There are many different kinds of voting systems used throughout the world. The U.S. has used the
electoral college system ever since the Constitution was written and ratified. The question is, is it
time to change our government and the way it is set up because the world has changed so much?
Although the Constitution was written in a totally different time period and the world has evolved
significantly in this time, the Constitution has made it to this day. Our government is not perfect but
it has been functioning well ever since we adopted the Constitution. Our nation has been a national
superpower and overall, been seen as a strong nation which means that our government system has
served us well so far. Nevertheless, there are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Majoritarian government is a good idea in theory but this system would not last. When you think
about a government ruled by majority, you tend to think that it would be a good thing because it is
simpler than the electoral college and it would be what the majority of America wanted. However,
you have to think about the downsides of this idea. It would not create a lot of stability in our
government. It is no secret that we elect our president and the idea is that the majority of America
favor that presidential candidate. Still, you see all the time that people are not happy or satisfied
when their preferred candidate is not elected. I believe that majoritarianism would make this
problem worse. It would allow for minorities to be excluded easily because if they did not have the
majority support then they would never be able to win representation in government. Quickly, the
government would end up being overtaken by a specific party. A big danger would be a political
party becoming too powerful if they continue to control representation in election after election. The
reigning majority could end up just becoming like a monarchy if they stay in power long enough. A
proportional representation system would allow the minority groups even more of a say than they
currently do.

The Electoral College System In The United States
Every year Americans are given the right to vote for the people they feel will best support the
government and help America. Voting is very important in the United States and without it, we
wouldn't be considered a representative republic. Americans vote by using a system named the
electoral college. The Electoral College is a system where the people vote for the person they feel
should win. The state tallies all of the votes made by the people living in the state and finds which
candidate got the majority of votes. Then the state as a whole will vote for the candidate with the
majority. Even if one candidate gets 51% of votes and the other gets 49% the candidate with 51% of
the votes gets 100% of the state's votes. The Electoral College is ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In the popular vote, every vote contributes in an equal way. This means that people know that their
vote will count. This is unlike the Electoral College and that is why people like the Popular Vote
much better. This method will guarantee that there will be a higher voter turnout than 60% of the
people eligible to vote. Everyone has an equal say in things. This is what our country values. It says
"all men are created equal" in the Declaration of Independence and people say that we should follow
those values and give everyone an equal say in things. States are not predetermined in a popular vote
because a democrat candidate can still get a lot of votes from a highly republican state. Also,
presidential campaigns won't focus on different states or people, the candidates will focus on
everyone because each vote counts. There will be no more labels such as swing states or one party
heavy states. Every state will get equal attention. People believe that there are many benefits for our
country's future if we put in the Popular Vote system to vote for our presidents such as a higher voter
turnout and no more states getting more attention than another. People say that the earlier this
system is put into place the better America will be, but others

America's Presidential Election System: The Electoral College
Do you know how our country's Presidential election system (The Electoral College) works? For
many years I didn't know much about the Electoral College, except that they were the system that
elected the president. So join me as we discover the aspects of the Electoral College. Our founding
fathers created a special election system called the Electoral College to elect the Presidents of
America. The Electoral College's Function, the reasoning behind its creation, its mathematics, and
how those mathematics impact campaigns are extremely fascinating.
The Electoral College's system is a complex process. There are a certain number of Electors in each
state. The Electors of every state are nominated by political parties, then on Election

The Electoral College System Is Outdated And Unfair
Every year on the fourth of November an election is taken place to select the next president of the
United States. Just recently, in the 2016 election, Hilary Clinton won the popular vote and Donald
Trump won the electoral vote, in which he was elected president. This made many Americans
question if the electoral college system is outdated and unfair and if the direct popular vote is a more
effective way of electing the president. This has happened twice where the candidate who has the
popular vote did not win the presidency. The problem that has arisen is that the rules of the
presidential election need to be replaced so that it will reflect the true opinion of the U.S. citizens.
According to Edwards III, under the constitution, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Every state has two senators and the number of representatives that is proportional to its population
(Schumaker 12). Congress decides who they want to dictate how many electors each state has based
it off of the state 's population (Edwards 14). The Constitution requires that winning candidate must
have 270 of the Electoral College votes. For instance, during the 2004 election, Bush had collected
271 electoral votes if he had two fewer votes and Gore two more than both of the candidates would
have had fifty percent of the Electoral College votes (Schumaker 12).
What is a popular vote? A popular vote is a way for a candidate to get a majority of votes for an
election. The citizens of the U.S. vote on a presidential candidate.
How was the Electoral College Founded? The Electoral College was constructed to be a
compromise between the different ways of selecting the president. Originally the delegates of the
Constitutional Convention wanted Congress to select eh president, while others preferred the direct
popular election (Schumaker 13). While the Constitutional Convention proceeded, one of the
founders established a "Committee of the Eleven" to create a compromise for selecting the president
(Schumaker 13). The reason for the idea of the Electoral College many opposed to the direct popular
vote because people feared that the less popular vote would feel inferior to other states (Schumaker
13). This method was widely accepted there was

The Failure Of The Electoral College System
Electoral College is a system of voting that requires for certain number to be attached to states as a
way determine the voting output of a that state. The number varies from state to state and each
assigned electoral college votes are claimed based on the candidate who has the highest number of
votes. There are few states in the US that divide their college vote base on the percentage obtain by
each participating candidate.
In 1787, the constitution met and adapted several systems of electing public official into office; the
system includes but not limited to president, lawmakers, governors, judges etc. At that convention,
delegates voted to approved the Electoral College System which primary goals was to provide
distribute some governance and leverage to states that have higher population ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Although this could feel as though your vote is about as decisive as those of an elementary school
election, the Electoral College process was actually put in place to ensure a nationwide system of
fairness. When you cast your vote for president, you also vote for an often–unnamed elector who
will cast a ballot in a separate election that ultimately choose the

The Electoral College Is A Unique System That Elects The...
Its November 8, and you are finally old enough to vote. You head to the nearest voting station and
check the name of the person you think is most fit to be President of the United States. Heart filled
with excitement, you put on your "I voted" sticker and head home to watch the election unravel.
Your states votes were finally counted, and the presidential candidate you voted for lost by 1%. Your
heart sinks as you realize all electoral votes for your state will go to the opposing candidate, and
48% of your population's votes will be silenced. The Electoral College should no longer be used to
elect the President of the United States, because it is an out dated method that makes the votes of the
people diluted and unequally distributed across the country.
To begin, the electoral college is a unique system that elects the president and vice president. When
Americans vote for a President and Vice President, they are actually voting for presidential electors,
in whole is the electoral college. It is these electors, who elect the chief executive. The Constitution
assigns each state a number of electors based on population. The number of electors per state ranges
from 3 to 54, for a total of 538. Furthermore, if a candidate gets the most votes in a state, he will,
usually, be given all electoral votes from that state. In order to win the presidency, a candidate must
get at least 270 of the electoral votes. Although winning the electoral means winning the presidency,
the electoral

Electoral College System Research Paper
How does Hillary Clinton have more people that voted for her but Donald Trump is our president?.
It doesn't make sense does it this happened because this idea called the electoral college system. The
electoral college system is in the US a body of people representing the states of the US, who
formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president. The person that gets the most
votes does not necessarily always win. All the votes are not equal and fair depending on the states
candidates. Most largely states are ignored even in close presidential races. I think we should get rid
of the electoral college system
I believe this idea is not helpful and that's why the person that gets the most votes does not
necessarily always win. For example in 1876 Rutherford Hayes his overall percentage of votes was
47,92% and Samuel Tilden was 50.92% and Rutherford ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A system in which a candidate only needs more votes than others rather than a majority of votes to
win. This system basically is ignoring people whose voices need to be heard like poor and middle
class people's votes. Here is another reason the electoral college isn't needed
Most largely states are ignored even in close president elections. from the harvard journal on
legislation states fully 72% was spent on 5 familiar battleground states. this shows out of all the 50
states 5 out of those states votes actually mattered. now let's look at the other side of this claim
Now lets see some of the advantages we would have if we keep this system. Each state gets its own
popular vote to decide which candidates should get the state's electors. 1 popular election per state x
50 states (including district of columbia). every state will be able to choose the best candidate for
your state. Now to conclude all this

Electoral College System Analysis
Introduction The Electoral College System has been incredibly successful for the United States
though it is occasionally maligned with some drawbacks. The Electoral College has provided
stability to the process of selecting presidents and has elected the presidential candidate who
received the most popular votes, except in four elections: 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016. Every
election time, there are always talks about revamping the system and changing to a direct, national
popular vote.
The Electoral College System The Electoral College System is the mechanism established by the
Constitution of the United States for the indirect election of the President and Vice President of the
United States. According to the National Archives, the founding ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Separate ballots are cast for the President and the Vice President, and a joint session of Congress
counts and certifies the votes on the January 6 of the following year. The electors are expected and
pledged but not required to cast a vote for the candidates they represent. Those who abstain or cast
their electoral votes for someone other than the candidate of the party they pledged to vote for are
known as faithless electors. Voting for a different candidate is not prohibited, but twenty–nine states
plus the District of Columbia have passed laws to punish faithless electors. In all the states, apart
from Nebraska and Maine, the state's elector is the candidate who gathers the majority of votes. In
Maine and Nebraska, electoral votes are assigned by proportional representation which means that
the winner is those states gets two votes. Unlike in the other 48 states where the winner–take–all
system is used, it's possible for both presidential candidates to receive electoral votes from Maine
and Nebraska. For a Presidential candidate to win, he/she requires a majority of 270 of 538. In the
case that no candidate manages to get a majority, then the President and Vice President are elected
through a process called contingent election; the House of Representatives elect the President while
the Senate elects the Vice President. The top three contenders compete, with each state casting

Questioning the Electoral College System Essay
Beginning at the time the Electoral College was put into place, many debated over its pros and cons.
As time has gone on, more and more people have begun to show support for a change in the system
(Saad 2013). After George W. Bush defeated AL Gore in the 2000 election by losing popular vote,
but winning the college, leading to a "legal recount contest", many began to question the fairness of
the college (Cohen, 2010). This marked the "third time in the nation's history" the less popular
candidate has taken office (Longley). However, the Electoral College should remain in place
because it ensures the continuation of a Representative Democracy, maintains a two party system,
and because currently no plausible plan has been produced as a means ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, around "93 million eligible citizens did not vote" in the 2012 election (" voter turnout,"
2012). Many confess they do not participate in politics, or even go to the polls, yet say they would
vote to get rid of the college. People want to go with the popular opinion, and are easily influenced
by it. Because a Representative Democracy is defined as "citizen's rule through representatives who
they elect periodically in order to keep them accountable", many argue a Representative Democracy
is still intact (Longley). However, the framers wanted to stay as far away from a Direct Democracy
as possible (Longley). In a Direct Democracy, the people have the ability to use "their vote alone" to
"select leaders" (Longley). By giving power to directly elect anyone we want, individuals have an
opportunity to run on an extremist agenda. In today's society, we often hear citizens complaining
about too much power held by the federal government. Truthfully, too much power held by the
people can be just as dangerous (Longley). The founders wanted no "agent of the government be
given unlimited power" whether that was the federal government, or the people themselves
(Longley). Just as a strong government can give rise to extremists, or even dictators, mislead
citizens can pave that path just as easily. And just as it is hard to take power away from a

The Pros And Causes Of The Electoral College System
How would we as Americans elect our president if we didn't use the electoral college system?
Would it be better or worse for our country? Our fore fathers wrote the constitution so that America
would have a different result than the opposing countries. They wanted to ensure that the future
generations could be successful and not deal with the tyranny that they had to deal with. Although I
cannot discuss the constitution, but rather a small portion. The part of the constitution that peaks my
interest the most is the Electoral College. A comprisable voting system that allows both the
government and the people have a say in what goes on politically. The Electoral College is a voting
system were the president and vice president are voted for indirectly. The participants vote for the
electors that then vote for both the president and vice president. Electors are members of the
government such as representatives and senators. Each state has as many votes as its number of
house of representatives, plus its two senators. The Electors have two votes per elector, one for the
president and one vote for the vice president; there is one exception though, the district of Columbia
has three electoral votes. If no nominated candidate wins most of the electoral votes, then the house
of representatives takes over the election. This system was put in place to ensure that the president
was fairly elected and so that the people had a say in who directed the country that we fought so
hard for. Now, to reinsure our people that they do have a say in the persons that are going to run this
country, states made votes to ensure that. Twenty–nine states have legal rights to how their electors
vote, meaning that their electors have taken a pledge to agree that they will vote along with the
popular vote in that state. Although, this system is almost a perfect compromise between
government and people power, most don't see it that way. Large quantities of Americans believe that
if America got rid of the Electoral College then this country would be a better place. However, the
constitution is not the problem.
Uneducated people tend to go more with the most popular opinion of the time, rather than studying
ready materials and casting

The Electoral College System Should Be Kept
Democratic theorist, Robert Dahl once said, "...every member must have an equal and effective
opportunity to vote, and all votes must be counted as equal." This quote greatly summarizes what
the Electoral College system means; every person in the United States is guaranteed one vote.
Everyone should have an equal opportunity to elect who serves in the government, and we are given
that opportunity through this system. This is what the Founding Fathers came up with in order to
solve the problems they faced over 200 years ago. However, some have opposed this system is not
fit for this democracy, and argue that other systems would work more fairly. On the contrary, I
strongly believe that the Electoral College system should be kept because it is the fairest way to
elect the President. What is the Electoral College? The Electoral College is a system that our
Founding Fathers established in the Constitution in which representatives from the 50 states elect
the President of the United States. The system begins with the people electing representatives to
represent them, and then the representatives meet so they can vote for the next President and Vice
President. The votes from each representative are then counted by Congress and are able to elect the
candidate that has the most votes. According to the U.S. National Archives and Records
Administration (2013), "The Electoral College consists of 538 electors...270 electoral votes is
required to elect the President." Every state has an

The Importance Of The Electoral College System
In 1787 the farmers at The Constitutional Convention put in motion The Electoral College system
because of their belief that the average american didn't have enough education/intelligence to
directly pick the president, making the U.S.A. a representative democracy. In brief the Electoral
System is made up of a body of repertentivates who were elected by the citizens and in return the
electors are suppose to cast their votes on behalf of the people. The number of electors given,was
established depending on the population of that individual state and each state is required to have no
less than 3 electors. This election system has been in effect for a little over 2 centuries, and as time
goes on both conservatives and democrats are coming to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
One person's say can not be compared to the say of 55 or millions of people. It is unfair that the
electoral College excludes people and states in a right that they have by law.
In the events of a 269 tie in the Electoral College, the voting right shits from the College to the
House of Representatives, making the state's delegates vote for the president. At that point, this is no
longer a representative democracy. The number of delegates that a states has is based on its
population and delegates are a mix of republicans and democrats. Who now have to together have to
decide between the two candidates, for each state gets only gets one vote. This violates the Checks
and Balance system because the legislative branch would have too much power because they are
deciding who would become the president.
The popular vote in the presidential election represents direct democracy and tells the government
who the public prefers to be their new leader. In the 1980 & 1992 presidential election Ronald
Reagan & Bill Clinton won both the popular and electoral vote making them the 40th and 42th
presidents of the United States. Unfortunately, the winner of the popular vote is not always a shoe in
to win the presidency, since the electoral college is not required to vote for the candidate who won

A New Voting System: The Electoral College
In 1787 the Framers established a new voting system known as the Electoral College. (Brown) It is a
group of electors chosen by the voters in every state to select the President and Vice President of the
United States. The reason for its creation was because the founding father were terrified of direct
election to the Presidency. They also had the interests of the small states and rural areas in mind and
wanted to make sure they were protected. This is how the Electoral College works in five steps:
(1) Each political party chooses a slate of electors before to the general election in November. These
electors promise to vote for a specific candidate. (2) In November of a presidential election year,
each state holds a general election in which all qualified citizens may vote. The outcomes from the
November election decide which political party's electors are chosen to vote in the Electoral College
in December. All of the electors for the candidate that wins the popular vote are selected to cast their
vote for President. This is call the "winner takes all" system. (3) In December, the electors gather in
their state capitols to cast their votes for President and Vice President 41 days after the election.
States may or may not require their electors to vote with the popular majority. Electors who vote
contrary to their promised nominee are called ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Soni) However, this can be seen to be a big problem as well. It does not mirror how the people
voted and the winner takes all method does not display what each districts belief truly is. (Brown) It
will also give some states too much control over the election and will not actually be a democracy
because it is not always the same results as popular vote.

Opponents Of The Electoral College System
Opponents of the Electoral College system also point to the risk of so–called "faithless" Electors. A
"faithless Elector" is one who is pledged to vote for his party 's candidate for president but
nevertheless votes for another candidate. There have been 7 such Electors in this century and as
recently as 1988 when a Democrat Elector in the State of West Virginia cast his votes for Lloyd
Bensen for president and Michael Dukakis for vice president instead of the other way around.
Faithless Electors have never changed the outcome of an election, though, simply because most
often their purpose is to make a statement rather than make a difference. That is to say, when the
electoral vote outcome is so obviously going to be for one candidate or the other, an occasional
Elector casts a vote for some personal favorite knowing full well that it will not make a difference in
the result. Still, if the prospect of a faithless Elector is so fearsome as to warrant a Constitutional
amendment, then it is possible to solve the problem without abolishing the Electoral College merely
by eliminating the individual Electors in favor of a purely mathematical process (since the
individual Electors are no longer essential to its operation).
Harm 2: direct popular vote does not encourage the cohesiveness of the country by not requiring a
distribution of popular support to be elected president
the Electoral College system contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a

The President of the United States is the supreme power of the country who enjoys vast powers.
According to the founding fathers of the Constitution, "the presidency is said to be an office of
immense honor and dignity, but one with little real power", but now the Presidential power has
expanded and the President is considered as the real head of the country who plays a key role in the
development and administration and good development of the country. The President is a person
who can acts as the backbone of a country. (Nowlan, 2012. pp 9–13); (How the Electoral College
System Works, 2017. pp 2–32). The President through the best of his ability preserve, protect and
defend the Constitution of the United States. In the words of Alexander Hamilton, one of the
Founding Fathers of the United States, the president is characterized by the ability to act with
"decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch." The modern president wears many hats, which includes
commander in chief, chief diplomat, policy leader, and chief administrator. Americans have
increasingly looked to the president as steward of the economy as well. Overall the President of the
United States is a multi–tasking head with many responsibilities, powers and functions. To the
welfare of his nation and to the wellbeing of his people, the President acts in many roles. As the
Commander in Chief of the Military he has vast powers and is responsible for all the military
decisions. The President is responsible for any action

The Electoral College Voting System
In the heavily political world we live in today, there are both upsides and downsides to our current
system. And with every aspect of our system, politicians can come up with loopholes to benefit
themselves. We are provided free healthcare, but you must fit certain circumstances in order to
receive it. We have the right to a fair trial, but a "fair" trial can quickly become a matter of race,
religion, or beliefs. In the same way, our democracy and how we elect our president must be dealt
with a tablespoon of salt.
The Electoral College is our voting system based off of 538 votes dispersed over the span of all 50
states. It is based off of population rather than size; a state with a massive population like New York
gets twenty–nine votes while a more scarce state like Montana only gets three votes. If a majority of
the previously elected voters vote for a particular candidate, then all of the votes for that state is
delegated to said candidate.
This has benefitted the United States for decades. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gerrymandering, a tactic used by the federal government, separates people of an opposing party
using county lines just enough so that their favored party gets the majority of the votes. By this
logic, the outcomes of the presidential election has already been decided before candidates begin the
campaign trail. Gerrymandering is the reason we can assume which states are swinging Republican
or Democratic. The votes that don't coincide with the state's previously chosen candidate are
completely forgotten, and can only be valid in the popular vote race. While trying to come up with a
plan to participate everyone, the government has therefore silenced other voters. Voters who care
about their country. Voters who believe in change. Voters who don't want to be punished for an
amendment they weren't even alive to see it take

The Electoral College System Of The United States Essay
After a year of voting and much debate the final decision of electing the 45th president of the United
States was once again down to the Electoral College. (history) The Electoral College system was
established by the founding fathers around 130 years ago and basically a process used to select the
President and vice President of the United States of America (Procon). So when you went to the
polls on November 8th and casted your vote for the next president, something else happened behind
the scenes and you may not like or if you are trump supporter you may love (Procon). For example,
lets say you're a Hillary Clinton supporter that lives in Washington, due to a certain amendment of
the United States constitution, the Electoral College, you're not actually voting for Hillary Clinton.
(Procon)If you're familiar with the process you are actually voting for a guy named Robert Satiacum
and eleven of his peers. So who is Robert Satiacum? (Procon) He and 11 others were selected by the
Washington state democratic party to represent them in Electoral College if their candidate, Hillary
Clinton, wins the popular vote (Procon). If that happens, then Robert and the eleven electors will
officially become electors of Washington, and they will earn the right to vote in the real election
(Procon). On the real Election Day, the five hundred and thirty eight members of the Electoral
College can technically vote for anyone they want (Procon). This process was thought of and finally
agreed upon

Electoral College Voting System
It's interesting to notice that in those four disputed elections of 1800, 1824, 1876 and 1960, the
winner of the popular vote didn't become President because they weren't the winners of the Electoral
College votes. The first two instances were mainly due to an unorganized system because of the
early establishment. However, there is a recurring pattern in the later elections.
In 1800, the problem was that the electors had two votes, one for President and one for the Vice
President, which, based on the outcome, resulted in the adoption of the 12th Amendment which
ensured that a tied vote for President wouldn't happen again. In the 1824 election resulted in the
creation of two political parties which were the Democratic and the Whig parties.

Who Is Really Voting? The System Of The Electoral College?
Who is really voting? The system of the Electoral College has been around for over two centuries.
This system provides a means for the president and vice presidential elections by way of state
electors. According to the United States Constitution Article II Section One , "Each State shall
appoint, in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct, a number of Electors , equal to the
whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress:
but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United
States, shall be appointed an Elector." Candidates campaign amongst the various states to gain the
popular votes of those states. If the candidate in fact does win the state by majority vote of the
citizens, the state's electoral representatives cast their votes towards that candidate. The abolition of
the Electoral College and adaptation of direct election would give people direct votes, make all
states important and help end controversy over direct vote and electoral vote.
There are a total of 538 electors, and each state has a varying amount of electoral votes depending
on the amount of electors. Those in favor of this system argue that it prevents larger populated states
from dominating the elections due to their either Democratic or Republican supportive nature. For
example, Texas is primarily considered a Republican state as California leans towards the
Democratic Party. Though this

The Electoral College System Is Not Effective
If I had the opportunity to change the Constitution of the United States of America, I would change
the Electoral College system. Like many other Americans, I feel that the Electoral College system is
not effective. It caries a notion of the state versus the people, electors oversee a large part of the
country and is change the answer to this issue? I believe that times have changed and we need to
reform the electoral system all while not changing the constitution.
The Constitution of the United States of America created a system called the Electoral College
where it outlines the rules in which we elect the President of the United States of America. As stated
in Article 2, Section 1 of the U. S. Constitution created the Electoral College. Each state receives as
many electoral votes as it has senators and representatives. Therefore, each state, including the
District of Columbia, will have at least three electors. This is the vision of the Constitution. Now the
problem arises when all the Electoral votes from one state are given to the popular winner for that
state. This causes a with people's right to chose their leader as votes of the people that voted for the
losing candidate are tossed in the trash. All this while giving the state the ultimate power to elect the
president.
The people of the loosing party on the state votes are not worth anything they are just given to the
winner basically with the current electoral system. The system needs to be redesigned to

The Electoral College: An Outdated and Flawed System
The infrastructure of American government, as set forth by the Constitution, has been subject to
multiple changes and adaptations over the course of history. These additions and changes, however,
are uncommon and only occur when an unavoidable and potentially crippling problem arises. The
process of amending the Constitution can be likened to the restoration process of a historical house;
even though changes are made to allow for the building to be functional in current times, the main
essence of the building is maintained – everything that does not absolutely need to be changed
remains unchanged. Although amendments to the Constitution are difficult to accomplish, an issue
has been festering under the surface of attention for centuries has bubbled to the surface within the
last two decades. This issue is the apparent flaws of the Electoral College System. The government
is capable of functioning with this outdated and flawed system; however, it would function more
efficiently if the system was replaced with a system that allowed the president to be elected by a
direct popular vote. The only way to accomplish this completely would be to pass an Amendment.
The Electoral College is the current system for electing the next president and the process is as
follows: a direct popular vote is conducted in each state – each of which has a fixed amount of
Electoral votes based on the population of the state – and then the winner is determined by a simple
majority of Electoral

The Electoral System: The American Electoral College
Election is defined as a democratic process of choosing a leader. It is a method of choosing a leader
that is widely applied not only in selecting national leaders but by which tend to this method to
reflect the democratic belief in excising their right to have a voice in choosing a leader of interest.
The chosen leader is said to be the one who garners the highest number of votes.
The American Electoral college
In America, elections are held at fixed and regular interval of four years. Unlike other countries, The
America uses an indirect method to elect a president and a vice president. This indirect device is
referred to as electoral college. The electoral system is used in electing the president and vice
president, in which electors expected

Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College System
The Electoral College System Every four years, on the Tuesday of the first Monday of November,
millions of U.S. citizens go out and vote for the next president. These votes are counted and
recorded, but whoever wins by popular vote, does not necessarily mean that whoever wins, will
automatically win presidency. The electoral college not only takes part, but it ultimately decides
who the next president will be. The electoral college system is a political institution that has been in
place for more than 200 years. This system was created during the Constitutional Convention to help
create a fair way to elect the president without giving too much power to the government or
individuals. Today, through past elections we can analyze how it works, its advantages, and its
disadvantages.
When elections are held in November, each state holds an election for president, in which all
eligible citizens may vote. Citizens vote for a ticket of candidates that includes a candidate for a
president and one for vice president. The outcome of the vote determines a slate of electors who will
make the actual choice for president and vice president in December. Each candidate running for
President in each state, has his or her own group of electors. Political parties nominate electors at
their state conventions. These electors are usually state–elected officials, party leaders of people
with a strong affiliation with the residential candidates. Neither the constitution or federal election
laws

Election Day Rises And The Electoral College System

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Kelley Hunter

More from Kelley Hunter (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Election Day Rises And The Electoral College System