This document summarizes a residential energy study conducted in San Marcos, CA. The study found that electricity consumption has a strong positive correlation with temperature, with peak consumption occurring in the summer. It was also found that some households are high energy users who increase their usage more in response to rising temperatures. The conclusions are that climate change may exacerbate energy demand in the future and that San Marcos should promote energy efficiency and renewable energy generation to reduce emissions.
1. B Y : K A Y L A C A R P E N T E R
Residential Energy Study in Relation to
Weather Conditions for San Marcos, CA
2. Energy Consumption & CO2 Emissions in the U.S
Climate change is caused
by the emission of green
house gases such as CO2
Sea level rise
Wild fires
Increased frequency
and intensity of heat
waves and drought
Fossil fuel electricity
generation accounts for
38% of CO2 emissions
13%
19%
27%
39%
Sources of electricity
Renewable
Nuclear
Natural Gas
Coal
6.8%4.2%
1.0%
0.5%
0.4% 0.3%
Hydro
Wind
Biomass wood
Biomass waste
Geothermal
Solar
3. Energy Consumption & CO2 Emissions in CA
California emits 345
million metric tons of
energy related CO2 per
year
29.7
Commercial
Electric Power
Residential
Industrial
Transportation
20%
80%
Renewables Other
Ranked 2nd overall for
energy related CO2
emissions
4. Energy Consumption & CO2 Emissions in the U.S
There’s a federal and state goal of reducing energy use
The federal goal of reducing carbon emissions by 17%
below 2005 levels by the year 2020
The California goal (AB 32 ) of reducing emissions to
1990 levels by 2020
Jerry Brown executive order
Options for reductions:
At a community level life style adjustments
At a governmental level increase renewable energy
5. Other Studies:
A Residential energy study in Seville, Spain found:
The sensitivity of electricity load to daily air temperature
have increased along time
Maximum electricity demand when maximum and
minimum temperatures occur (Valor et al. 2001)
Now I will look at San Marcos
6. Hypotheses:
Objective 1: Characterize energy use and CO2 emissions
in San Marcos
Objective 2: Characterize seasonal and daily energy use
temperature and relative humidity will positively
correlate with electricity consumption
peak consumption will occur over the summer season
Objective 3: Characterize the energy use behavior of high
versus low users
8. San Marcos, CA
Became an incorporated city in 1963
Population in 2010 was approximately 90,000
Pop density approximately ~ 3,400 people/mile2
Median household income~ $64,415
9. Methods
Hourly meter data from
SDGE in kilo-watt hours
1 kWh will power a 100
watt light bulb for 10
hours
1 kWh = watching TV
for 10 hours
Hourly temperature &
relative humidity data
from the University of
Utah
Data organization
Analyses :
Descriptive statistics
Correlation
10. Hypotheses:
Objective 1: Characterize energy use and CO2 emissions
in San Marcos
Objective 2: Characterize seasonal and daily energy use
temperature and relative humidity will positively
correlate with electricity consumption
peak consumption will occur over the summer season
Objective 3: Characterize the energy use behavior of high
versus low users
11. Results: San Marcos and National average of
electricity usage and carbon emissions per household
12069
7753
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
National San Marcos
kWh
Average kWh
kWh/home
7.27
5.35
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
National San Marcos
Average metric tons CO2
Metric tons CO2/home
Metrictons
12. Hypotheses:
Objective 1: Characterize energy use and CO2 emissions
in San Marcos
Objective 2: Characterize seasonal and daily energy use
temperature and relative humidity will positively
correlate with electricity consumption
peak consumption will occur over the summer season
Objective 3: Characterize the energy use behavior of high
versus low users
13. Results: Seasonal Correlation
Seasonal correlation between energy use and weather
conditions (N=2160)
Temperature Relative Humidity
Winter .025 .085
Spring .250** -.116**
Summer .492** -.275**
Fall .384** .007
* Significant at 0.05. ** Significant at 0.01
14. Hourly Electricity Consumption by Season
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
kWh
Time
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
All Seasons
16. Energy Consumption in the Summer at 9 pm
• Average household
uses ~1.4 kWh
• Bottom 5% of
households used
<.5 kWh
• Top 5% used >2.67
kWh
17. Hypotheses:
Objective 1: Characterize energy use and CO2 emissions
in San Marcos
Objective 2: Characterize seasonal and daily energy use
temperature and relative humidity will positively
correlate with electricity consumption
peak consumption will occur over the summer season
Objective 3: Characterize the energy use behavior of high
versus low users
18. Identifying high and low users
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Group 1
Group 1: households with a
significant positive
correlation between usage
and temperature
Group 0: remaining
households
T value: 7.04
Significance: .000
Standard error of the
difference: .066
Group 0
kWh
N = 374 N = 189
19. Discussion
Comparison to Seville, Spain:
Temperature has a strong positive correlation to energy
demand
Both San Marcos and Seville use the most energy at the
highest temperature
Due to the similar mild climate:
Results are applicable to San Diego
20. Discussion
In Mediterranean, there is a projected 2°C increase from
2031-2060
Reduced energy use in winter, increased over summer
Peak demand occurs over the dry season which is
expected to become drier
Potential for energy shortages
Conditions for solar and wind power may improve
(Giannakopoulos et al. 2009)
21. Discussion
The frequency of extreme heat events in California is
projected to increase rapidly
An increase up to 4x for previously temperate cities
At current ability, electrical deficits up to 17% can occur
(Miller et al. 2007)
Because there is a definitive relationship between
temperature and electricity demand in San Marcos:
Deficits can occur on peak demand days
22. Conclusion:
Temperature and electricity demand are strongly correlated
Climate change will worsen this demand
To comply with emission reduction goals and to avoid
potential future energy deficits, San Marcos should:
Adjust comfort level at peak hour demand over summer
Increase solar and wind power generation
24. References
Valor, Enric, Vicente Meneu, and Vicente Caselles. "Daily air temperature and electricity load in Spain." Journal of applied
Meteorology 40.8 (2001): 1413-1421.
Miller, Norman L., et al. "Climate, extreme heat, and electricity demand in California." Journal of Applied Meteorology and
Climatology 47.6 (2008): 1834-1844.
Giannakopoulos, Christos, et al. "Climatic changes and associated impacts in the Mediterranean resulting from a 2 C global
warming." Global and Planetary Change 68.3 (2009): 209-224.
"U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis." Lower Electricity-related CO2
Emissions Reflect Lower Carbon Intensity and Electricity Use. Web. 21 Apr. 2015.
<http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=18511#>.
"U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis." U.S. Energy Information
Administration (EIA). Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.cfm#gencapacity>.
"Total Electricity System Power." Total Electricity System Power. Web. 21 Apr. 2015.
<http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/total_system_power.html>.
"U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis." Residential Energy Consumption
Survey (RECS). Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/>.
"U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis." State-Level Energy-Related Carbon
Dioxide Emissions, 2000-2009. Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/state/analysis/>.
Editor's Notes
CO2 has a residence time of 200 years
Climate change can more sporadic weather all over the world but Southern California is especially at risk to sea level rise, increased wild fires, and increased frequency and duration of heat waves and drought
Electricity generation from fossil fuels accounts for 38% of total CO2 emissions in the U.S
CA is number 2 for overall emissions in the US
Pie chart with CA and compare to the rest of the US individuals can make a difference
Residential energy consumption just a small component but individuals can make a difference
Electricity consumption is lower in CA than national average due to mild climate
*this energy is in state
Due to CC concerns- there are goals to reduce
Overall, energy related carbon emissions have been declining over the past five years
Largely due to reductions in industrial power sector
Residential and commercial demand are on the rise so this is why im focusing on residential
substitution of carbon intensive generation- natural gas + renewables displaces coal and petroleum
Wind and solar on the rise- in 2005 it generated 18 bil kWh but 2013 generated 176 bil kWh
Largely due to reductions in the industrial power sector
Demand for residential and commercial continues to rise
***change months to numbers****
San Marcos, California, was chosen as a case study to determine the behavior of energy users and if this can relate to emissions reductions.
Koppen Climate Classification: Bsh (warm semi-arid)
15 inches of annual precipitation
Average temp = 68.45
SM was incorporated most of the growth occurred…
There was rapid population growth in 1970’s & 80’s
Most of the homes are 30 to 40 years old
I used climatic data and SDG&E meter data in kWh for 563 households during January 17, 2014 to January 15, 2014
*explain average of the hourly data for all meters (563) for that season and used correlation analysis for temp and RH
*explain what months are what (winter = dec jan feb , spring = march apr may, sum = june july aug, fall= sept oct nov)
Summer and fall had best correlation, winter and spring the weakest
Stopped analyzing RH, chose winter and summer to continue analysis bc of correlation and double peak in winter ( or to represent how mild the winters are here), fall can be explained bc
All 563 meters consumption average for one day by season
For seasonal energy use patterns, winter showed two peaks in energy usage, one in the morning at 9:00h and the second in the evening at 19:00h while summer showed generally high energy usage in the evening and peaked at 21:00h
I was interested to find more about the double peak in winter and the all day trend in summer. I also found the gap between summer and spring interesting and the gap between sumemr and the all season average
From the last graph- I was interested to see if the correlation between temperature and consumption would increase at peak hour
Average of all 563 meters at the peak hour (summer peak is 21h and winter peak is 7h)
Correlation analysis was performed between temperature and kWh for the peak hour by season.
There was an inverse relationship for winter, with r = -.190, and a highly significant positive relationship for summer with r= .729.
Because the correlation between summer at peak hour and temperature increased from .492 to .729 I was interested to see how the community was distributed
During the peak consumption hour over summer the average household uses 1.4 kWh. The bottom 5% of the households, the low energy consumers, used less than .5 kWh; while the top 5% consumers used over 2.67 kWh
The majority of households used from .5 to 1 kWh, postively skewed, a few people use A LOT ~9kWh -- relate this back to how much 1 kWh equals
-- point out range for the majority – and the range from zero to 9.0 kWh
With a large sample size- why is it still statistically significant?
The group that is statistically correlated with temp uses much more energy- the standard error determines the difference between the two groups
T value = 7.04 and the significance is .000 and standard error is .066
T-test to see if the two groups are actually statistically different difference is very significant
Further analysis on the correlations between individual household energy use and temperature revealed that during the peak consumption hour in summer, 374 households’ energy usage was statistically correlated to temperature variation and they used 1.5 kWh on average compared to 1.0 kWh used by the other households. We divided the households into 2 groups with Group1 for those with strong positive correlations between energy use and temperature, representing majority of the households in San Marcos (Fig. 6), and Group0 for the remainder households. A Student t test showed that households in Group1 on average used significantly more electricity at peak hour during the summer than the others
Like Seville, Spain consumption was found to be strongest at temperature maxima
I found a paper on the potential impacts of climate change in the medd this assumes we continue to use at the same rate and
reduced energy in winter bc it will be warmer less heating
increased over summer bc of cooling needs
bc peak demand occurs over summer in the dry season- which is expected to become drier- lower water supply impacts hydroelectric and power plants that use water for cooling
r energy demands may not be able to be met in warm season if adaptation or mitigation does not occur
2 degree Celsius increase is about a 3-4 degree farenheit increase
More specifically for California–
with a rise in temperature, intensity frequency and duration of heat waves are expected up to 4x for temperate cities like LA and SD
with current availability and technology, population constant– deficits can occur on the peak demand days
Because my hypotheses were supported : energy demand is highest over summer
Climate change will worsen the demand for energy due to increased cooling
We can kill two birds with one stone-
we can reduce emissions by using less (it can be as simple as opening your windows when it starts to cool/ close them in the morning before it gets hot, closing your blinds in the morning ) and using alternative energies