Decarbonizing the U.S. Energy Sector -- A Study in Optimization and Tradeoffs
1. Decarbonizing the US Electricity Sector
Christopher T Clack Boulder CO, 14th Nov. 2015
2. 30
300
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
AnthropogenicAtmosphericCarbon
Dioxide(partspermillion)
Year
Observations
(278 ppm pre-industrial subtracted)
2 X CO2
Exponential Increase:
Doubling Time = 32 years
2 X CO2 = 2 x 278 ppm = 556 ppm
Year at 556 ppm ~ 2054
Post Industrial Carbon Dioxide Rise
When (years ago): 30,000 3M 20 M 40 M
Equilibrium climate: Pleistocene Pliocene Eocene
Image updated and adapted from PNAS paper, Hofmann, et al;
Solomon et al, Irreversible Climate Change, February 2009;
Beerling & Royer, Convergent Cenezoic CO2, Nature Geoscience, July 2011
3. The global circulation is a machine that is constantly running
This machine runs
constantly : any
“variability” is a local
phenomenon.
Transferring ~ 16 PW excess heat
from the tropics to the Poles
5. The variability of wind increases by 5 times when area is
decreased by three orders of magnitude
Variability here is defined as the average coefficient of variation over a geographic region when divided up into isolated regions
6. My home (hyper-local) was under a snow storm in December
2014 that stopped solar production for seven days
Lost solar PV production for seven full days, while my energy demand increased sharply as it
was very cold. The average consumption over the period was 1 kW (used 168 kWh over 7
days), with peak hourly demand at 4.8 kW. Additionally, the wind was also very low in my area
at that time too.
15. The Electric Power System in 2012
Documentation at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/research/renewable_energy/news-simulator.html
16. US Aggregated Electric Demand
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
ElectricalDemand(GW)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
300
400
500
600
700
300
400
500
600
700
We know hour-by-hour what the electric demand is in ~130 regions across the
contiguous US for nine years (2006 – 2015)
* Load expanded by GDP, and then
by 0.7% per annum to 2030
17. Land Use Constraints
• The type and amount of electricity generation installed in each RUC cell is constrained by:
– Spacing between facilities
– Topography of the land
– Land Use (residential, commercial, protected lands, etc…)
Wind Solar PV
18. Cost Data – Can use different ones if you want to
see the changes
ethelow cost estimateisbased upon theoptimistic pricesin thestudiesreviewed. The
evaluesarethemean of thehigh and low prices.
re 11: The projected 2030 overnight capital costs including fixed O&M in 2013$ us
resent study.
The natural gas power plants are assumed to be a more mature technology. Therefore
useasinglecost for thenatural gaspower plantsin all threeof thepricescenarios, naNatural gas has a heat rate of 6430 Btu / kWh. Variable O&M is $3.31 / MWh
* * *
29. Assuming the electricity grid can grow in size, the amount of wind
and solar installed increases and cost of energy decreases
Utilization of Wind and Solar (Low RE, High NG)
104
105
106
107
Area (km2
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Carbon-FreeGeneration(%)
USA
Europe
China
Australia
Total Annual Cost of the System (Low RE & High NG)
104
105
106
107
Area (km2
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
Differencecomparedwithlargestdomain(%)
The increase in installed capacity and reduction in costs are influenced by a number of factors:
• The total energy demand required
• The wind and solar resource, its location and its proximity to population
• The data used in the model (weather resolution, load profile, transmission, etc.)
32. If each country works on its own energy solution without coordination with other
nations the cost optimal mix is 55% wind and solar over the continent
Taken into account:
• Individual Countries
• Land area
• Water
• Population Space
• Weather resource
• Technology
• Energy demand
• Cost Optimal
CO2: 974.9 mmT
Cost: 8.1¢ / kWh
Wind: 434.3 GW (29.0%)
PV: 575.2 GW (26.2%)
Natural Gas: 886.9 GW (44.8%)
Curtailment: (7.3%)
Not taken into account:
• Storage
• Other technologies
• Transmission
• Existing infrastructure
33. If the African continent combined their resources and grids
the wind and solar levels goes to 93% for lower cost
Taken into account:
• Individual Countries Combined
• Land area
• Water
• Population Space
• Weather resource
• Technology
• Energy demand
• Cost Optimal
CO2: 160.3 mmT
Cost: 5.2¢ / kWh (35.8% decrease)
Wind: 1125.0 GW (85.1%)
PV: 139.8 GW (7.6%)
Natural Gas: 384.9 GW (7.4%)
Curtailment: (11.3%)
Not taken into account:
• Storage
• Other technologies
• Transmission
• Existing infrastructure
34. The African continent has a very large area, and accordingly the
variability is lower and that drives an increase in wind and solar
Utilization of Wind and Solar (Low RE, High NG)
104
105
106
107
Area (km2
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Carbon-FreeGeneration(%)
USA
Europe
China
Australia
*
35. When you have small areas the variability is much
greater than over a larger aggregated region
Dispatch Stack
0 168 336 503 671 839
Time (Hrs)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Generation&Load(GW)
Dispatch Stack
3648 3816 3984 4151 4319 4487
Time (Hrs)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Generation&Load(GW)
36. The larger geographic area allows much more wind and
solar to be integrated cost effectively
Dispatch Stack
0 168 336 503 671 839
Time (Hrs)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Generation&Load(GW)
Dispatch Stack
3648 3816 3984 4151 4319 4487
Time (Hrs)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Generation&Load(GW)