1. Julie Larsen
University of Texas at Dallas
Assistant Director of Emerging Media and Communication
Megan Gray
University of Texas at Dallas
Assistant Director of the Humanities

2.  Identify and discuss our core values
 Understand advising core values as defined by
NACADA
 Find congruence and conflict between personal
values and advising values
 Create a plan to find balance between personal and
advising values

3.  On a scale of 1-10:
 How happy are you in your current
advising position?
 Do your personal values feel in conflict
with the values and goals of your office?

4. Image via Threecoaching.com

5.  Are you currently in congruence with your values?
Image via ViRTUS

6. Image from NACADA website

9. Image credit
Image credit
Image credit

10.  What inspired you to become an academic advisor?
 What drives you to continue to be an advisor?
 What is unique about your advising style?
 What is your long term professional goal as related to
advising?
 Why do you need to have your own philosophy
even if your department has one?

11. VS

13.  What are you already doing to reconcile
your personal and office philosophy?
 What are new ways you can reconcile
conflicts between your office and personal
values?
 What roadblocks my prevent you from
applying your philosophy and action plan?

15.  Resource List: http://bit.ly/UTAAAValues2013
 SlideShare:
Megan Gray Julie Larsen
Megan.Gray@utdallas.edu Julie.larsen@utdallas.edu
@julieclarsen