Anti Imperialism Essay

The Justification of an Anti–Imperialist Imperialism appears to be a vital goal and factor in the U.S
during the late 1800s. Americans yearn to gain more control and soon rise to become a world power,
similar to the conduct of our forefathers. However, this philosophy is counter to the origins of our
country. We believed in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, yet Americans were being
hypocritical of this conviction. They took the action of colonizing other countries and tyrannizing
them without their consent. With this in mind, it is clear this goes against American beliefs, owing
to the fact we fought and struggled immensely to win our independence from England. In the end,
are Americans still being mindful and empathetic of the other nations whether they are weaker or not
fully developed? Or, are they only conscious of what they 'll get for themselves? Overall, retaining
control of other countries without a settled agreement or negotiation and denouncing them of their
liberty is truly un–American and goes against The Declaration of Independence. The exploits of
imperialism is averse to our American values, including personal and collective rights. One of these
values, which is freedom, is a core component in our country. It embraces the fundamental beliefs put
forth by our Constitution. Based on treaties, pacts and alliances between our country and other
nations, we are lured into conflicts that force upon the human rights of the populations of other
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

After America's victory from the Spanish–American War, many raised the question of adding yet
another civilization to the american nation. Because of Spain's mistreatment and cruelty towards the
Philippines, the people of America questioned of annexing this country. Division about the
annexation spread amongst the citizens, many claimed to be against this proposal (were soon
labeled anti–imperialists), while others seemed to enjoy it. Pros and cons were listed thoroughly,
they each talked about why their side was right. Cons that were stated mainly focused on
independence, equality, and culture of this country. While the pros mainly focused on
self–government, consent, and destruction. Anti–imperialists argued that independence, equality,
and culture played a huge role on why the Americans should liberate the Filipinos instead of just
occupying their country. Independence should be granted to these people as it could be a pretty
good business deal in the future. "War of conquest is as unwise as it is unrighteous.... It is not
necessary to own people in order to trade with them." said by William Jennings Bryan, it brought
attention to the negative standpoint that it would have caused. Not adding the country would have
allowed the US to trade later on without having to use manpower and force to get what they needed.
Equality also came into view when dealing with this difficult decision. Abraham Lincoln once said, "
When the white man governs himself, that is self–government,

Anti-Imperial Themes
To the Israelites their religion was who they were; God's chosen people. Preserving their identity
throughout centuries of foreign rule was at times life threatening. Although their liberties greatly
varied from the Persian Empire to the Roman Empire their means of resisting both empires stemmed
from the same source, their religious texts. There are many examples of texts with anti–imperial
themes within Wisdom Literature, Prayer, Songs, Apocalyptic Literature and most importantly the
Gospels. With the increasing threat that foreign rule posed many of these texts offered ways to
understand the situations by offering their audience guidance, hope, and most of all by preserving
their culture which in terms helped them resist cultural annihilation.

Anti Imperialism Dbq
When the American Anti–Imperialist League was founded in 1899, the American government since
occupying Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippine Islands. Mark Twain, Andrew Carnegie and
William James and many honorable citizens were the founding members of the Anti–Imperialist
League and the objective of the League was to campaign against the control of the Philippines. To
the platform of the American Anti–Imperialist League their opposition of the expansion the
imperialism as they believed it is hostile to liberty and they being biased toward the America of their
annexation against Philippines. The most important point of the document is to imperialism that
American government was doing it is actually more than that against for. In document V,
...show more
content...
For when the another government control all the habitable land of the country and people of the
country have no choice to live free and have no legal permission to move elsewhere. As the author
express the radical implication of the Abraham Lincoln, that "no man is good enough to govern
another man without that other's consent." This implies that if the government set the law people
are not used to because every country has their own rights which is the biggest power of the every
land. Since an imperial government is the top power in a country, the government gives itself the
right to make laws. If a country or territory is under the administrative power of another country's
government for example Philippines by American hands, then they only have whatever rights are
given to them by their overseer. However, the argument is there is no right to another country to
make unethical law enforcement and force people to just follow their rules against their

Anti-Imperialism And American Identity
The concept of American identity is different for everyone. Though the definition differs from
person to person it is based on the same idea of nationalism. In the late 1890s, every American was
proud of what their nation had accomplished thus far, but after the Spanish–American War, the
opinions of supporters and non–supporters showed a clear difference in their meaning of their
American identity. Supporters, also known as imperialists, used beliefs such as the New Manifest
Destiny, Darwinism, the Monroe Doctrine, and racial supremacy to support their wanting to archive
islands and territories around the word. Non–supporters, also known as anti–imperialists, used
documents such as the Declaration of Constitution and the Constitution to express their feelings of
disapproval. Consequently, in 1899, anti–imperialist Senator George Hoar presented a speech
explaining that acquiring land would be immoral and dishonorable. He claimed "under the
Declaration of Independence you cannot govern a foreign territory, a foreign people, another people
than your own." Hoar also included his belief that, "You have no right at the cannon's mouth to
impose on an unwilling people your Declaration of Independence and your Constitution and your
notions of freedom and notions of what is good." Charles Eliot Norton in a letter to Charles
Waldstein expressed his anti–imperialist beliefs in a letter. Norton, unlike many anti–imperialists,
respected the fact that other people supported imperialism. He

A Argument On Imperialism
Imperialism is the practice of powerful nations attempting to acquire control over lesser nations;
typically, imperialism revolves around expanding or upholding influence. Historically, in The United
States, an imperialistic mindset is perceivable in the popular concept of manifest destiny. Again, in
1823, The United States seeks to exude international influence in publishing The Monroe Doctrine.
Later, the document is used as reasoning to invade territories. Evidently, the mindsets of many
Americans was intertwined with imperialism. The idea of growing a continental nation expanded into
international affairs. With The United States becoming involved in over–seas empires, imperialism
became a topic of controversy. Arguments for expansion included...show more content...
Carnegie's ideas centered on the importance of internal advances. Roosevelt, who was a supporter
of imperialism, even stated, "a nation's first duty is within its own borders." Carnegie questioned
whether America, "Is . . . to exchange internal growth and advancement for the development of
external possessions which can never be really hers?" The argument largely centered on upholding
the quality of life in America. Accordingly, Carnegie wrote, "The luxuries of the masses in other
lands are the necessaries of life in ours." By avoiding the lure of imperialism, "(America is)
impregnable against serious attack," and can focus on its own internal advancement. Twain's
argument against imperialism differs strongly from the ideas of Carnegie. Twain views imperialism
as contradictory to America's core values. The Anti–Imperialist League uses democracy, or the
concept of people holding the power, to assert, "that a government derives its just powers from the
consent of the governed." Twain claims, "There must be two Americas: one that sets the captive
free, and one that takes a once captive's new freedom away from him." Like the Anti–Imperialist
League, Twain believes imperialism infringes upon the rights America claims to give individuals.
America, according to Twain, "kills him to get his land." The act of conquering nations removes the
power from the people; America has no consent to govern foreigners. Being an imperialistic power,
in reference to Twain, "debauched America's honor and blackened her face before the

There are arguments that are for and against American imperialism. One of the arguments against
American imperialism would be the hypocrisy. They say that the government can be chosen by the
people. Another argument would that now America would be involved with Asian conflicts. Also, if
a president or leader acts tyrannical to other countries, then who could say that the president or
leader would act like that in our home country. It also went against Christian beliefs, it forced people
to follow and go along. An argument for Americanimperialism would be increased natural resources
and expand the markets. American imperialism was also good for the economy, it would boost it.
We would have our country's military be able to back

Ah Q Imperialism
In his novel "The True Story of Ah Q ," Lu Xun (1921) mainly describes a tragic man called Ah Q, a
homeless man who is always doing different part–time jobs living a remote village called Weichuang
in early 20th century China. Lu Xun(1881–1936), whose real name is Zhou Shuren is a famous
modern litterateur and thinker. When he was young, he went Japan to study medicine to save the
patient during the war time. During his study in China, he realized that to be a doctor just can cure
people, however, cannot save the people from the pain of the life. Therefore, he gave up his medical
study and became a writer to use his articles to arouse Chinese to protect their country, and against
the feudalism and foreign imperialism. The social background...show more content...
This phrase is full of his sigh, pity and woe. At the same time, the novel is full of criticism of the
national nature of Chinese people.
The novel and the actually history showed a series of realistic issues at that time. Firstly, early 20th
century's China was under the oppression of imperialism, and people were lived in a tough
environment. Secondly, people's ignorance rooted in his lack of education. If people generally had
been educated, the idea of revolution would be much easier and quicker to spread. Thirdly, the
failures of the revolution not only because of board masses, even some of the revolutionaries were
hollow hearted, or did not understand the significance of revolution.
Xinhai revolution and publish of The True Story of Ah Q has past above 100 years. Nowadays
China has a incredible development, and Chinese have a finally success. Many people also have Ah
Q' s psychological victory. How to keep self–awareness is becoming a topic of worth thinking about.
At the same time, a lot of people of ruling class look like Old Grandpa Zhao, they are against the
original intention and core value––– Serving the people

The Anti Colonialism And Postcolonialism
Anti–colonialism and postcolonialism are two words closely related but different in meaning.
Anti–colonialism is the act of trying to drive out the colonizer from the native home land. In films,
anti–colonialism is an apology for colonialism in that the colonizers are portrayed as evil and
wrongdoers. Postcolonialism, however, is not an apology at all because at this point it is too late to
apologize. Postcolonialism is defined as the period of time after the colonizers have left and control
of the native lands has returned to the indigenous peoples. Postcolonialism deals with the cultural
legacy of colonialism and is more in the context of our world today, not the American frontier. Avatar
is an anti–colonial film because colonization is taking place in the film while Like Water for
Chocolate is a postcolonial film because it is in the context of the period after colonialism,
although colonialism is still alluded to. Avatar's plot is built upon the concept of borders between
dual worlds. The protagonist, Jake Sully, goes back and forth between these two worlds through
the use of his artificial body. Sully is hybrid because he is essentially split between two worlds as
he cannot simultaneously be conscious in both bodies at once. He isn 't necessarily hybrid by the
end of the film though because he chooses the Na'vi culture and leaves his old life behind. Grace, a
scientist who arrived on Pandora far before the avatar team, is another example of a hybrid
character. Grace,

Arguments Against Imperialism
After meeting with all of the characters and listening to their different perspectives on imperialism Ii
would like to maintain my current position as an anti imperialist. When listening to the characters
present their cases and respond to questions I have come to the conclusion that America has no
altruistic morals of helping out other nations, but instead we have goals to marginalize and exploit
people from a different culture.we should focus on the problems that lie at home in expanding
shouldn't be our primary focus which would in turn increase the problems in America. Sure this
would boost our economy but i see know reason why we can't do this by industrializing the south.
Furthermore with rises of groups such as the kkk and jim crow

Anti Imperialism Nationalism
The Rise of Anti–Imperialism Nationalism In today's world, most of the nations' borders are clearly
defined and travelling between national borders will lead to from one culture to a different one.
These national borders that are such an integral part of the today's society were implemented less
than a century ago. Nationalism, the feeling of love for one's country, united people to repel
imperialist influences from their nation. However, it was also nationalism that drove Europeans to
engage in their imperialistic practices to gain necessary resources for their industrialization. As a
reaction towards imperialism, people became anti–imperialists to fight against the imperialist ideals
of the West and their desire to exploit other regions through their use of violence. One of the ways
anti–imperialists united against the Imperialists was through the feeling of nationalism. Therefore,
nationalism is a double–edged sword; it can be expressed as a form of anti–imperialism and
imperialism. However, not all forms of anti–imperialism are directly expressed as nationalism, there
were forms of anti–imperialism such as Pan–Asianism, and Pan–Islam that ultimately evolved into a
nationalistic movement, but they were not nationalistic movements to begin with. The rise of
nationalism occurred during the French Revolution with the abdication of the French monarch,
France established the world's first "nation–state", and its people defined themselves as French
(Misha 20). With the fall

Mckinley's Anti-American Imperialism
On September 6, 1901, President William McKinley was assassinated. In 1900, William McKinley
faced William Jennings Bryan for the second time; who had an anti–imperialism image. McKinley
was reelected with a bigger margin than 4 years earlier (the four years earlier; he had a margin of
600,000). The outcome reflected the Americans' expectations with the outcome of
Spanish–American War and the country's economic success. After the second inauguration (formal
admission of someone to office. On March 1901, William went on a tour of the western, in which
he was greeted by cheering crowds. The tour ended in Buffalo, New York, where he gave a speech
on September 5 in front of 50,000 people at the Pan–American Exposition. The trailing day, William

Anti-Imperialism Dbq Analysis
The Philippines were fighting Spain for several years before America joined the war. The war took
place in Cuba and on the waters of the Philippines in 1898 when the Americans joined the war. It
ended with a victory for the Philippines and the Americans causing the Filipinos to receive their
independence. Due to their victorious win the United States gained all of Spain's territories. The U.S
had to decide whether to give the islands back to Spain, give the Filipino their independents, or to
annex the Philippines. The United States finally decided to annex the Philippines but they had to
hold a treaty that needed to be signed by the U.S Sensates. A two–thirds majority vote was required
for the treaty to be place and it passed by one vote. After the war ended there was a controversy if
the U.S should or...show more content...
The Platform of the American Anti–Imperialist League spoke out about their opinion on America
annexing the Philippines in October of 1899, a year after the annexation was placed. A Platform is
a group or a political party who fights for a series of positions or beliefs. The American
Anti–Imperialist League mentioned "We protested against the extension of the American sovereignty
by Spanish methods" (Document A). The Filipinos were fighting against the United States and felt
betrayed since they heard America was going to annex them. The Filipinos were demanding for
their independence that they deserved, but America was too selfish to give it to them and denied
their rights to have freedom. America was using military forces to pressurize these civilians to learn
the United States ways of life and to learn christianity. They also put innocent people into
concentration camps to feel powerful and in control. The United States took the role of Spain and
treated these innocent people unfairly and with no

Examples Of Anti Imperialism
If I had been alive in the late 1800's, I would have taken the anti–imperialism side, because I feel that
imperialism is immoral and inhuman. Imperialism is when bigger, powerful nations seek to
dominate and take over smaller, and weaker nations. When the larger nation usually takes over they
use military force, and basically rob the struggling little country of its natural resources for the
powerful nations benefit. The natives that live in the weaker countries usually are treated horribly,
and their voices are silenced due to the wealth, technology, and strength. These industrialized, and
advanced factors just mad the more powerful countries think they were the most superior race above
all others (known as racism) and only prompted them

Nationalism And Imperialism
Nationalism and Imperialism are two important yet distinct ideologies that have shaped the
geopolitical world. Both have led to the annexation of lands and the formation of national borders.
Nationalism and Imperialism can be viewed as two ends of a spectrum of patriotism, with
nationalism on the weak end and imperialism on the strong end. In terms of global significance,
imperialism, as a force of domination, subjugation, and exploitation, is more important than
nationalism.
Nationalism can be understood as pride in one's country. It is a spirit in which members of a country
can be seen to care about their national identity. For example, many Americans exude national pride
on the Fourth of July, the day of their country's emancipation...show more content...
Like the westward continental expansion of manifest destiny during the 1820s–1840s, the expansion
of the United States into the Pacific in 1898 was widely regarded as inevitable and altruistic. For this
reason, territorial expansion can be seen as a symptom of nationalism. In modern times, nationalism
has provided justification for foreign military involvement. For example, following the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001, many Americans were in favor of "humanitarian" intervention in the
Middle East and approved of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that began in 2003.
Imperialism is nationalism taken to the extreme. Imperialism is a form of nationalism that includes
the belief that one's own countryand culture is superior to all other countries and cultures.
Imperialism leads to the formation of empires through conquest and brutality. There are many
examples throughout history of violent subjugation and exploitation of conquered peoples, carried
out in the name of imperialism. For most of the 16th and 17th centuries, Spain was the world's great
imperial power. The Spanish colonized lands and conquered people throughout North and South
America. The Spanish conquistadors were interested in generating as much wealth as possible for
the Spanish Crown, and agricultural production was the most important source of revenue. To work
the land, the

Comintern And Anti-Imperialism
With Chinese intellectuals being intrigued by socialist policies, especially Leninism, Communist
International agents began meeting with influential officials in two rising political parties in China.
The larger of the two parties the Communist International agents met with was the Chinese
Nationalist Party. The nationalist party was largely focused on gaining control of the current
Republic of China and then properly implementing its intended government system. The Comintern
viewed the nationalist party as anti–imperialistic and thought that anti–imperialism would garner the
greatest amount of support in China. The nationalist party and Comintern came to an agreement to
work together that featured Comintern sending advisors and military equipment.

Anti Imperialism Analysis
The treaty that came from the Spanish–American War gave Puerto Rico and Guam with American
and allowed America to purchase the Philippines. While the Spanish–American Treaty brought
division within America, the Anti–imperialist argued against annexation of the Philippines and
declared it unconstitutional and the Imperialist or expansionist was in favor of the treaty supporting
America's growth and power. Both imperialist and anti–imperialist did not want the Philippines to
become a "non–white" state to enter the union. The Supreme Court made decisions also known as
the "Insular Cases", which gave the Philippines an "unincorporated territory" of the United States. By
winning the hearts and minds of the Filipino people (Burns) America had the...show more content...
One view was the Philippine people wanted a benevolent to Americanize and wanted America to
protect their interests. The second reasoning was Filipino people were incapable of self–governing
and unable to support its people. Imperialist also believed that by colonizing the Philippines would
help expand the US military influence in the region and expand America markets to other world

Mark Twain Who Is Anti-Imperialism
Mark Twain who is anti–imperialism. Twain was once for imperialism he thought that it was good
for the government to rescuing the islands from the government at hand. But, he then changed to an
anti–imperialism person as he felt if we took places from others then we would be the ones who are
responsible for the protection of said places. He though instead of taking a place and helping them
with their freedom that we should allow them to get their freedom

Anti Imperialism Dbq
The conflict was between the imperialists and the anti– imperialists, who were both in America and
the Philippines. Imperialism is when one supports the annexation of another. In this case, America
annexing the Philippines. Document A was written by the Platform of the American Anti
–
Imperialist League. This group of individuals thought poorly of imperialism and that it was wrong
to take over others. According to this document, it states in the first paragraph, "... extinguish the
spirit of 1776 in those islands. This is saying that by annexing the Philippines, we are forgetting all
that happened when we broke free from Britain as rebels. If we did this, it would be extremely
hypocritical. Also in Document A, the anti– imperialist platform

Arguments Against Imperialism
Imperialism is defined as a country overthrowing and occupying its neighboring territories and
controlling their politics, economics, and social life.
Those who support imperialism argue that it boosts national pride, spreads laws and religions, and
allows for the conduction of scientific experiments among many other benefits. Imperialism was
supported because it made the government and economy stronger, and helped the armies of
occupying powers grow. Private companies supported imperialism because saw huge benefits from
it. Due to the expansion, new marketplaces and cheap labor became available as well as valuable
natural resources and land. Imperialism was also supported because of the WANT to explore
territories that were unknown to them.

Anti Imperialism Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Service College

More from Paper Writing Service College (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Anti Imperialism Essay