write an 8-10 page paper citing at least 10 scholarly sources. In this assignment, I will be looking for: A strong thesis. The various historical arguments, and evidence that you understand them thoroughly. Good use and incorporation of evidence to make your point. Clear cohesive, argumentative writing. Creativity and Critical Thought in your argument. That is, you should use your readings to come up with an argument that is not obvious or derived solely from the readings, but combines the readings in a new way.         2)  ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY  - I expect you to use a mix of scholarly sources including monographs, articles in edited volumes, and journal articles from peer edited scholarly journals (like those on JSTOR); you will need to take advantage of hard copies from the library and online resources. Ultimately, you will summarize this reading in an eight-item annotated bibliography. Begin the bibliography with a paragraph detailing how you will approach your research question; that is, what is the broader question, what is the aspect of the question that will be your focus, and what do you think your thesis might be. Then include a detailed annotation for each of eight pieces that you have read to this point, including the way that you see that piece fitting into your overall argument. For more on writing an annotated bibliography and examples, see the handout on blackboard. In this assignment, each annotation should include Bibliographic information, in Chicago Style A good description of the reading, including the reading’s  topic ,  argument ,  evidence . In order to help you understand the piece in the context of the project you are working on, it should also indicate  how the piece relates  to others that you have read for this topic. Does the author argue against or support another scholar’s conclusions? How do the works differ? Your evaluation  of the work. Do you think the author presents good evidence for the argument? Do you agree with his or her conclusions? How might this work be useful to your project (or not)? In addition, I will be looking at the whole assignment for the following: The  paragraph  telling me how you will approach your argument. This should be in line with the sources you have presented. Eight Scholarly Secondary Sources. Variety  in terms of journals, books, and chapters in edited volume. At least some  newer scholarship  (pieces written after 2000). Sources that are  appropriate in terms of time and place . If you are working on Adolf Hitler, a book called  Adolf Hitler and the New Germany  would be great. One called  Dictators through History  is not relevant. 3) PAPER - Finally, write an 8-10 page paper citing at least 10 scholarly sources. In this assignment, I will be looking for: A strong thesis. The various  historical arguments , and evidence that you understand them thoroughly. A good  use and incorporation of evidence  to make your point. Clear cohesive, argumen ...

1. write an 8-10 page paper citing at least 10 scholarly sources.
In this assignment, I will be looking for:
A strong thesis.
The various historical arguments, and evidence that you
understand them thoroughly.
Good use and incorporation of evidence to make your point.
Clear cohesive, argumentative writing.
Creativity and Critical Thought in your argument. That is, you
should use your readings to come up with an argument that is
not obvious or derived solely from the readings, but combines
the readings in a new way.
2)
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
- I expect you to use a mix of scholarly sources including
monographs, articles in edited volumes, and journal articles
from peer edited scholarly journals (like those on JSTOR); you
will need to take advantage of hard copies from the library and
online resources.
Ultimately, you will summarize this reading in an eight-item
annotated bibliography. Begin the bibliography with a
paragraph detailing how you will approach your research
question; that is, what is the broader question, what is the
aspect of the question that will be your focus, and what do you

2. think your thesis might be. Then include a detailed annotation
for each of eight pieces that you have read to this point,
including the way that you see that piece fitting into your
overall argument. For more on writing an annotated
bibliography and examples, see the handout on blackboard.
In this assignment, each annotation should include
Bibliographic information, in Chicago Style
A good description of the reading, including the reading’s
topic
,
argument
,
evidence
.
In order to help you understand the piece in the context of the
project you are working on, it should also indicate
how the piece relates
to others that you have read for this topic. Does the author
argue against or support another scholar’s conclusions? How do
the works differ?
Your evaluation
of the work. Do you think the author presents good evidence
for the argument? Do you agree with his or her conclusions?
How might this work be useful to your project (or not)?
In addition, I will be looking at the whole assignment for the
following:

3. The
paragraph
telling me how you will approach your argument. This should
be in line with the sources you have presented.
Eight Scholarly Secondary Sources.
Variety
in terms of journals, books, and chapters in edited volume.
At least some
newer scholarship
(pieces written after 2000).
Sources that are
appropriate in terms of time and place
. If you are working on Adolf Hitler, a book called
Adolf Hitler and the New Germany
would be great. One called
Dictators through History
is not relevant.
3) PAPER - Finally, write an 8-10 page paper citing at least 10
scholarly sources.
In this assignment, I will be looking for:
A strong thesis.
The various
historical arguments
, and evidence that you understand them thoroughly.
A good

4. use and incorporation of evidence
to make your point.
Clear cohesive, argumentative
writing
.
Creativity
and
Critical Thought
in your argument. That is, you should use your readings to
come up with an argument that is not obvious or derived solely
from the readings, but combines the readings in a new way. i
need to have the turnitin report and the report also
HERE IS THE TOPIC I CHOSE:
1.
The economic consequences of World War I for Europe
here are the sources for the paper:
Annotated Bibliography
“Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933.” 2017.
Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933
, August, 1.
To begin with, one of the biggest causes that happen after
World War I was the Great Depression. Starting with the Great
Depression was my first thought because it affected all Europe
and happened after the war. The economic state of Europe was

5. at its worse when soldiers where back from war, majority of
soldiers couldn’t find work After World War I the Great
Depression started in the early 1920s and lasted until the 1930s.
Even though the Great Depression started in United States it
was like a domino effect taking over in all of Europe. As the
stock prices fell the Great Depression effected income/revenue
tax, profits, and international trade. In certain places the Great
Depression effected the population more than others. Countries
that had production, farming was hit hard especially. Since the
economic state of Europe was in bad shape the Agricultural
Adjustment Act of 1933 (AAA) was created from President
Franklin D Roosevelt New Deal. This act was put into place to
increase agriculture purchasing power to raise revenue. The act
helped people through programs, farmers, adults, etc.
de Sanchez, J. A. M. 1922. “Further Economic Consequences of
the Peace.”
Foreign Affairs
First and foremost, this source is an academic review of
“America and the Balance Sheet of Europe” by J.A.M de
Sanchez. Sanchez breaks every part of the information that’s in
the book
Thomas 2
and elaborates on his understanding of that particular part of the
book and he lets the readers know if he agrees with that part or
not. Helps me further understand the author and what message
they are trying to get across. Within this review de Sanchez
states that the authors Bass and Moulton agrees with a big
amount of taxation given to the people is a burden. It depends
on where the country is finically. He compares this with the
country Czechoslovakia and how they give this program of

6. heavy taxation to “balance” the economic system but the same
people that wanted the program was the first one that saw it
wasn’t possible for the counties’ economic state. In places like
France when they were doing expansion for the country receipts
showed that tax got higher. During that time imports and
exports had drastically decreased.
Dooley, Stephan Richard. 2005.
Between the Wars. [Electronic Resource] : Economic Seeds of
World War II
. The Europeans. New York, N.Y. : Films Media Group, [2005],
c1997.
Secondly, this electronic video recording from Stephan Richard
Dooley sets the tone talking about the way World War I change
the landscape of Europe which is one of the causes that lead to
World War II. Within this video recording Dooley mentions the
1929 stock market crash. Also known as the Wall Street Crash
of 1929, it was one of the worse market crashes in history and
its after effects lead to more crashes. Because of mass
production in the cities the farmers had to find other ways of
making money. Causing people to sell their stocks all at once.
Production was at a stop, and people were in debt. Furthermore,
Dooley talks about the Treaty of Versailles harsh consequences
targeting Germany as the fall guy to pay back the allies. The
Treaty of Versailles was supposed to bring peace but cause
inflation in Germany and open the door to Fascism. Fascism
was rising but not just in Germany but also to countries/nations
like
Thomas 3
Italy, Spain. The Munich Agreement among the nations of
Germany, Great Britain, France, and Italy. Sometimes referred

7. to as the Munich Betrayal. On September 29th, 1938 was an
agreement that Germany would get a territory of
Czechoslovakia. This agreement was put in place to avoid war
by the Germans under the rule of Hitler, which ultimately didn’t
last.
"Figure 2f From: Irimia R, Gottschling M (2016) Taxonomic
Revision of Rochefortia Sw.
(Ehretiaceae, Boraginales). Biodiversity Data Journal 4: E7720.
Furthermore, this source has a report that observes the financing
and economic issues in the wars throughout the United States.
Also looking into the economic state like tax policies, economic
growth and decrease, budget of the country etc.
Because of that it’s like a guild of how countries can learn from
their economic mistakes and finically grow. By “higher taxes,
reductions in other government spending, government
borrowing from the public, or money creation”. Higher taxes
will work in places where they are thriving well. In other
countries where the population is barely making money to
support themselves and added taxation would be a crime.
Reduction in other government spending would help that
country more because that money could be put into somewhere
else. This source provides because of war government must put
more spending into military where it wasn’t there before. Is
barrowing money from the public a well solution to financial
problem?
Keynes, John Maynard.
The End of Laissez-faire: The Economic Consequences of the
Peace
.

8. ReadaClassic, 2010.
Thomas 4
For instance, this book is a great source to include in my paper
because the author is a well-known economist within both world
wars. He was present at the Versailles peace conference, there
along I get an account from a person that was present when the
nations were coming up with the treaty. Part of this book
Keynes has a theory that the “Good Deal” administration by
President Woodrow Wilson has some cause that leads to some
of the consequences of the economics of Europe. Also, Keynes
is in favor of the Laissez-Faire policy. He provides a
background of what Laissez-Faire policy is and what it means to
him. He believes that the government should be “Hands Off”
and let the people deal with the market and the government
should only be involved with programs to help the people.
Programs like unemployment, health care, etc. Within this
policy Keynes feel that’s how the country will progresses.
Lampe, John R. 2014. “Stabilizing Southeastern Europe,
Financial Legacies and European
Lessons from the First World War.”
Moreover, this source is exactly what I need because it provides
firsthand accounts about the way economic state of Europe was
after World War I. After this, the paper talks about the
economic consequences of WWI, Lampe focuses on
Southeastern Europe. Often when people are talking about
Europe, they only think about the main party’s involved like
Germany, France, Great Britain, United States etc. people forget
about Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Yugoslav. The changes that
the regions had to undergo because of WWI. Because of this I

9. am able to get the full understanding of all Europe rather than
the popular regions people are used to. Lampe provides visual
representation and statistics to his audience to get a better
understanding of the
Thomas 5
landscape of the countries. Because of that the readers are able
to notice the changes of these geographical borders and how
they have change after WWI. The way he goes in depth with
focusing on individual events that occurred but relating those
events as a whole for Europe.
"The Impact of the First World War and Its Implications for
Europe Today." Heinrich Böll
Foundation.
In addition, in my earlier sources they provided me with
economic consequences of Europe after WWI, but this source
goes a little bit further into the political, state, ethnic
consequences that are still present today. WWI didn’t just have
economic implications but give birth to new empires, created
world powers and destroyed empires, frequent migrations
among the populations. Allies that was once made didn’t last.
After WWI Western Europe thought mostly about their political
stand and relations with other nations. Next this source talks
about the death toll and men left paralyzed because of the war,
it stated “An entire Generation of young men was wiped away”
(Par 11). On a lighter note the first war did have some positive
changes that resulted because of it. Positive changes like new
medicine, weapons, military strategies, politics, new social
ideas and giving birth to women’s rights.

10. Potter, Edmund D. 2018. “World War I Debts.”
For instance, it’s no clear-cut answer who caused World War I
but its commonly said that Germany played a huge rule in
causing the war to start. The allies wanted to send a message to
the other countries when they made Germany took the blame for
starting WWI. Ultimately making Germany sign the Treaty of
Versailles to pay reparations for their actions of the war.
Thomas 6
Roughly WWI cost 150 billion dollars. It was expensive for this
war to happen and after the war the countries would soon
realize this. Germany couldn’t keep up with the payments and
the United States had to step in and loan Germany money to
keep up with the payments. Even with the help of the United
States Germany still couldn’t continue to pay. Because of the
Great Depression the United States couldn’t continue to lend
Germany money they had to start using their money somewhere
else. Decisions that the United States were taking to better the
Economy was actually making it worse.
I NEED IT BY 10:00AM TOMORROW 5/1/19
here is the rubric
Book Review Rubric_ AntoniettaCriteriaRatingsThesis
Excellent

11. Clearly identifies and critically evaluates the author’s central
argument, purpose, and approach to the subject.
Good
Identifies but not does critically evaluate the author’s central
argument, purpose, and approach to the subject.
Needs Improvement
Identifies a few main ideas but no the thesis.
Unsatisfactory
Is unaware of the author’s thesis or the purpose of the book.
The review is descriptive but not analytical.
Organization
Excellent
The review is exceptionally well organized with an
introduction, body, and conclusion and follows the thesis
throughout.
Good
The review is reasonably well organized.
Needs Improvement

12. The review has a semblance of structure but its coherence is
minimized by poor organization.
Unsatisfactory
The review is disorganized and incoherent.
Development
Excellent
The review is a general analysis of the salient features of the
book, as opposed to a general summary, and identifies the
development of the author’s thesis throughout the book.
Good
Demonstrates knowledge of the topic and provides supporting
evidence and adequate detail.
Needs Improvement
Minimal analysis, is repetitious, or lacks development and
review of salient features of the book.
Unsatisfactory
No analysis but merely a description or summary of the book’s
content.
Style

13. Excellent
Sophisticated sentence structure and paragraph development
Good
Effective use of language
Needs Improvement
Simplistic sentence structure and imprecise use of language
Unsatisfactory
Incorrect sentence structure and use of slang, jargon, or
inappropriate language
Mechanics
Excellent
The mechanics of the paper are correct. It is well written with
no grammar or punctuation, errors, and little or no use of the
passive voice.
Good
Few errors
Needs Improvement

14. Errors interfere with the presentation of ideas and arguments.
Unsatisfactory
Excessive errors in grammar and punctuation.