The experience of Sudanese lecturers in dealing with international reputable journals تجربة المحاضرين السودانيين في التعامل مع المجلات العالمية ذات السمعة الطيبة
هذا العرض حول تجربة المحاضرين السودانيين في التعامل مع المجلات العالمية ذات السمعة الطيبة، وتعلم مراحل نشر الاوراق العلمية في المجلات العالمية
This presentation is about the experience of Sudanese lecturers in dealing with reputable international journals, and learning the stages of publishing scientific papers in international journals.
Utilising Open Education Resources in support of curriculum transformation at...
Similar to The experience of Sudanese lecturers in dealing with international reputable journals تجربة المحاضرين السودانيين في التعامل مع المجلات العالمية ذات السمعة الطيبة
Similar to The experience of Sudanese lecturers in dealing with international reputable journals تجربة المحاضرين السودانيين في التعامل مع المجلات العالمية ذات السمعة الطيبة (20)
Escorts Service Kumaraswamy Layout ☎ 7737669865☎ Book Your One night Stand (B...
The experience of Sudanese lecturers in dealing with international reputable journals تجربة المحاضرين السودانيين في التعامل مع المجلات العالمية ذات السمعة الطيبة
1. الطيبة السمعة ذات العالمية المجالت مع التعامل في السودانيين المحاضرين تجربة
The experience of Sudanese lecturers in dealing with
international reputable journals
By:
HUSSEIN GIBREEL MUSA B.A, M.ILKOM
20820153025
Lecturer in Communication Science
Faculty
El Geneina Uineversity, Sudan
4. Acknowledgment that root causes of low educational
outcomes in Sudan are
a lack of
accountability
a lack of capacity
Weak institutional
functionality
There is no budget
for scientific
research from the
country
minds immigration العقول هجرة
5. Every paper must have at least one clear key idea that
advances knowledge, Papers may be descriptive approaches to
phenomena and processes, or purely modeling or analytical
treatments. Trend is to combined approaches and to trans-
disciplinary analyses.
6. The experience of Sudanese lecturers in dealing with
international reputable journals
•Abstract
Methods
Preparing the paper – Structure
7. The experience of Sudanese lecturers in dealing
with international reputable journals
.
1
2
3
4 Dealing with reviews
Reviewing aids writing
Maximizing citations
Writing in English as a foreign
language
Preparing paper, Common
pitfalls
Plagiarism, self-plagiarism,
and dual publication
8. factors you should consider to recognize the Reputable journals:
1. Publisher, (Springer, Wiley, Elsevier, etc.), you can feel more confident that the
journal is a reputable journal as well.
2. Peer review. Reputable journals use peer review in selecting manuscripts for
publication.
3. Editorial board. Most reputable journals have an international editorial board.
Review the names of the editorial board and determine if they are from established
universities worldwide.
4. Indexing. For your published article to be discoverable, the journal should be
indexed in familiar online databases (e.g., PubMed, Science Citation Index,
SCOPUS, etc.).
5. Consistency. Reputable journals publish consistent content at consistent intervals
(weekly, monthly, etc.). You should review the table of contents from recently
published issues and ensure the journal is consistent in their publications.
9. ppr submit
journal received from customer
first review Scope/Cross check?
Editor/AE Select 3
reviewers
Reviews & editorial decision
Copy editing
& production
Publication 55%
10. Conclusion
• Migration of minds from the country to developed countries
• Negative view of Sudanese society towards scientific research
• Lack of scientific and technical equipment
• The university has few lecturers with PhDs to spear head research productivity.
• The salary of the teaching staff in my university does not encourage faculty staff to
engage in research activities.
• The university has limited equipment and material for undertaking research
activities.
• The University does not allocate 2% of its income for research activities.
• The university does not have adequate computer application software resources for
data analysis.
• The university does not have collaborative initiative of staff research in teams.
• The university does not provide institutional/ departmental support on research