Paul Flatt – Why Engineers Must Add Value Hurley Palmer Flatt https://www.cibsejournal.com/general/interview-with-paul-flatt-why-engineers-must-add-value/ https://www.facebook.com/hurley.palmer.flatt/ https://twitter.com/hpf_group?lang=en

1. Paul Flatt – Why I believe engineers must add value
(605 words)
There are many in construction who are concerned about the skills shortages after Britain
leaves the European Union. Some believe that companies who are over-reliant on European
engineers will be left with gaps in their personnel, but this is simply not the case. I have little
sympathy for those who struggle to recruit. Look at the tech-media world, 10 years ago
these firms didn’t exist. They have never complained about a skills gap because they have
trained up their own workforce. You gave to invest.
The way we at Hurley Palmer Flatt invest in people is through our graduate trainee
programme, which was shortlisted for a CIBSE Building Performance Award last month. This
Gifted & Talented framework aims to accelerate the progression of promising engineers.
Last year we recruited 12 graduates. However, based on the amount of applications we
received, we could have taken 70. We’re not struggling to find people in the UK. To join our
team, you not only have to be an excellent engineer, bit you must be able to communicate
and have commercial awareness. Engineers must add value and that is what will keep them
alive. A trait our training programme aims to instil into our graduates is to have a
commercial mindset.
Regarding communication, the quality of graduates has risen massively over the past 10
years. It surprises me how confident they are in saying what they believe. An older
generation would think about an issue but not bring it up, but this generation will. This
means they learn more quickly. Schools are to thank for this as they encourage children to
mix with people of all ages and backgrounds.
More building services engineering is being done in collaboration with structural engineers,
especially in refurbishments. There are more opportunities to save on costs if we integrate
the two. Working together mean we van reuse more space effectively and save money for
clients. Up until now, everything has been siloed. also working together means a less
complex way of communicating. At the moment, there might be three identical contracts
for three engineers. It is better to have one contracts, one firm.
We help translate the gap between the engineer and the architects by using our Advanced
Building Optimisation tool. We use this tool to ensure that the designs maximise energy
savings and space efficiency. The tool considers renewables, material specification, the cost
of potential solutions and looks at the life-cycle of a building. Our clients use this tool so
opportunities to cut costs and energy are identified at an early stage and to tests the
architect’s initial designs. We provide commercial value and it is important that engineers
demonstrate this because if they don’t, there is a risk that there will be no engineering
consultants in 30 years-time as the developer will speak directly with the manufacturer.
The growing complexity of buildings is giving engineering consultants the opportunity to
demonstrate their ability to save client’s money. Engineers are also in an advantageous
position to ensure developers are protected from uncertainty over future energy supplies.
There is a limited capacity in existing gas and electric grids, they’re under pressure in terms

2. of demand. As a result, more energy production will be local to source, and I don’t just
mean CHP. Local energy centres will offer more security and options for increasingly off-grid
supply. An advantage of centralising energy production is to remove plant in individual
buildings and to generate more development value for the client. Its back to making sure
engineers are commercial. We have to be price-driven, not in terms of our fee, but in terms
of operational and capital costs.