SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
2014 HIS Vendor Revenue
© 2014 by H.I.S. Professionals, LLC, all rights reserved.
By Vince Ciotti, Principal
HIS Professionals, LLC
1980 1990 2000 2010 2015
HIS-tory of Vendor Revenue
• If you’ve been reading print magazines in our industry along with
getting far more unvarnished insights from HIStalk, you’ve
probably followed our annual rankings of the leading HIS
vendors in order of their annual revenue for many years:
– Original credit for the idea must go to Bill Childs who created
this whole niche when he started his Computers in Hospitals
magazine way back in 1980 with a whopping 52 pages.
• Bill’s magazines morphed & were renamed
many times over the years, and subsequent
rags expanded the vendor review from 25 to
100 vendors in issues running 200 pages.
• Last year, the magazine we wrote our vendor
review for shrunk so small (≈30 pages) they
only ran our article on their web site, so this
year we’re only running it on HIS-talk!
Definitions
• It’s important to define what one means by an “HIS” vendor
since some of the rag’s rankings include billion-dollar firms in
their top 10 (such as Dell, Phillips, CareFusion and Cognizant),
that don’t even offer an HIS, which we carefully define as:
- Hospital – acute care facilities are their primary
market, not “just” physician practices, managed
care, long term care, home health, PACS, etc.
- Information – the full suite of software needed
to automate a hospital: both financial and clinical
systems. Thus, specialty vendor like SCC &
Sunquest for LIS and Oracle for ERP are excluded.
- Systems - the complete package of hardware,
software and implementation. This excludes
giants like Dell, CSC, IBM Leidos, HP, etc, who
primarily offer hardware and/or consulting.
2014 HIS Vendors Revenue
• We obtained the figures from published earnings reports and
SEC filings (K-10s). Estimates had to be made for companies that
are privately held (e.g.: Medhost), or are a part of giants whose
“Healthcare” revenue includes many non-IT products (e.g.: GE).
2014 Shockers
• There are some surprises in this table that deserve highlighting:
- Cerner – jumped ahead of McKesson to be the
#1 vendor in the HIS industry by revenue for the
first time in the firm’s 35-year history. And that’s
without the ≈$1.2B they will gain from Siemen’s
client base (which closed in Feb of this year)!
- Meditech – actually declined in revenue by 11%
from 2013. Their annual report last year was
delayed for many months due to some “booking”
issues, so maybe it’s an accounting anomaly, but
this is their first drop in revenue in decades…
- Slow Growth – many vendors showed small growth
compared to previous years, including McKesson
(5%), Epic (4%), Allscripts (1%), and CPSI (2%).
Whassup?
• Overall, the revenue total for these top 12 HIS vendors only
increased by 5%, compared to previous years when the total
revenue increased as much as 17% as illustrated below:
Meaningful Abuse!?
• The reason for this relatively flat market can be found in the
HITECH Act – our consulting firm’s experience sums it up well:
- One of our major product lines is system
selections, and in the boom years of 2009 to 2011
when hospitals were buying EHRs to earn MU $s ,
we did 10-12 searches per year, and I bought
(too) many of these rare collector motorcycles:
- From 2012 to 2014, we shrunk down to 2-3 searches per
year as hospitals stayed with their current vendor’s EHR
(no matter how poor) struggling to attest for Stage 1 & 2
MU criteria. Our business has been so slow I am now
selling my most valuable bike to try to make ends meet!
- HIS vendors have seen this slowdown in new sales too, as I’ve
heard many Sales executives lament over the past few years...
Next 3 Weeks
• We’ll delve into the details of the 12 vendors’ performance over
then next 3 episodes of this review, broken down by the three
major HIS market segments (in terms of beds and revenue):
– Large – those vendors whose derive the majority of their
revenue from large hospitals over 300 beds in size, including
many AMCs & Multi-IDNS: Cerner, Epic, Allscripts & GE.
– Mid-Size – vendors whose target market includes mainly mid-
size hospitals of 100 to 300 beds in size, including Meditech
(all 3), McKesson’s Paragon, NTT Data and QuadraMed.
– Small – vendors whose client base consists of mostly under
100 bed facilities, including CAH (Critical Access Hospitals) of
under 25 beds: CPSI, Medhost, Healthland and NextGen.
• Any questions, comments, or offers on my Honda, please contact:
Vince Ciotti, vciotti@hispros.com, 505.466.4958

More Related Content

What's hot

2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendorsTim Histalk
 
2. 2016 macro vendors 1
2. 2016 macro vendors 12. 2016 macro vendors 1
2. 2016 macro vendors 1Barry Mathis
 
3. 2016 Mid-Range Vendors Elise Ames
3. 2016 Mid-Range Vendors Elise Ames3. 2016 Mid-Range Vendors Elise Ames
3. 2016 Mid-Range Vendors Elise AmesBarry Mathis
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 261. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 26Tim Histalk
 
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 302. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 30Tim Histalk
 
Buyers seminar hi story
Buyers seminar hi storyBuyers seminar hi story
Buyers seminar hi storyTim Histalk
 
4. 2016 small vendors 1
4. 2016 small vendors 14. 2016 small vendors 1
4. 2016 small vendors 1Barry Mathis
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 251. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 25Tim Histalk
 
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-43. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4Tim Histalk
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendorsTim Histalk
 
1. 2017 top his vendors
1. 2017 top his vendors1. 2017 top his vendors
1. 2017 top his vendorsTim Histalk
 
2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendorsTim Histalk
 
108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5Tim Histalk
 
106. cerner, part 3
106. cerner, part 3106. cerner, part 3
106. cerner, part 3Tim Histalk
 

What's hot (16)

2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors
 
2. 2016 macro vendors 1
2. 2016 macro vendors 12. 2016 macro vendors 1
2. 2016 macro vendors 1
 
3. 2016 Mid-Range Vendors Elise Ames
3. 2016 Mid-Range Vendors Elise Ames3. 2016 Mid-Range Vendors Elise Ames
3. 2016 Mid-Range Vendors Elise Ames
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 261. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
 
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 302. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
 
Buyers seminar hi story
Buyers seminar hi storyBuyers seminar hi story
Buyers seminar hi story
 
4. 2016 small vendors 1
4. 2016 small vendors 14. 2016 small vendors 1
4. 2016 small vendors 1
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 251. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
 
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-43. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors
 
1. 2017 top his vendors
1. 2017 top his vendors1. 2017 top his vendors
1. 2017 top his vendors
 
2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors
 
8. diy rating
8. diy rating8. diy rating
8. diy rating
 
Finding a Niche in Business Reporting by Angel Gonzalez
Finding a Niche in Business Reporting by Angel GonzalezFinding a Niche in Business Reporting by Angel Gonzalez
Finding a Niche in Business Reporting by Angel Gonzalez
 
108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5
 
106. cerner, part 3
106. cerner, part 3106. cerner, part 3
106. cerner, part 3
 

Similar to 2014 vendor overview

1. 2014 vendor overview
1. 2014 vendor overview1. 2014 vendor overview
1. 2014 vendor overviewBarry Mathis
 
1. 2016 vendor review c 1
1. 2016 vendor review c 11. 2016 vendor review c 1
1. 2016 vendor review c 1Barry Mathis
 
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
1. 2017 Top HIS VendorsElise Ames
 
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendorsHispros
 
1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review cTim Histalk
 
1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review cBarry Mathis
 
2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendorsBarry Mathis
 
2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendorsBarry Mathis
 
2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendorsBarry Mathis
 
3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendorsTim Histalk
 
3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendorsBarry Mathis
 
4. 2017 low end vendors
4. 2017 low end vendors4. 2017 low end vendors
4. 2017 low end vendorsTim Histalk
 
2. 2017 Macro Vendors
2. 2017 Macro Vendors 2. 2017 Macro Vendors
2. 2017 Macro Vendors Hispros
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendorsBarry Mathis
 
Venator Funds - February 2017 Performance
Venator Funds - February 2017 PerformanceVenator Funds - February 2017 Performance
Venator Funds - February 2017 PerformanceBrian Viveiros
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendorsBarry Mathis
 
61. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 361. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 3Hispros
 

Similar to 2014 vendor overview (20)

1. 2014 vendor overview
1. 2014 vendor overview1. 2014 vendor overview
1. 2014 vendor overview
 
1. 2016 vendor review c 1
1. 2016 vendor review c 11. 2016 vendor review c 1
1. 2016 vendor review c 1
 
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
 
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
 
1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c
 
1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c
 
2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors
 
2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors
 
2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors
 
3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors
 
3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors
 
4. 2017 low end vendors
4. 2017 low end vendors4. 2017 low end vendors
4. 2017 low end vendors
 
2. 2017 Macro Vendors
2. 2017 Macro Vendors 2. 2017 Macro Vendors
2. 2017 Macro Vendors
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors
 
Shillington
ShillingtonShillington
Shillington
 
1. august 1987
1. august 19871. august 1987
1. august 1987
 
Venator Funds - February 2017 Performance
Venator Funds - February 2017 PerformanceVenator Funds - February 2017 Performance
Venator Funds - February 2017 Performance
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors
 
61. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 361. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 3
 
61. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 361. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 3
 

More from Tim Histalk

2. february 1988
2. february 19882. february 1988
2. february 1988Tim Histalk
 
5. december 1987
5. december 19875. december 1987
5. december 1987Tim Histalk
 
4. november 1987
4. november 19874. november 1987
4. november 1987Tim Histalk
 
2 september 1987
2 september 19872 september 1987
2 september 1987Tim Histalk
 
109. cerner, part 6
109. cerner, part 6109. cerner, part 6
109. cerner, part 6Tim Histalk
 
108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5Tim Histalk
 
107. cerner, part 4
107. cerner, part 4107. cerner, part 4
107. cerner, part 4Tim Histalk
 
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 bTim Histalk
 
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 282. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28Tim Histalk
 
1. 2017 md vendor overview
1. 2017 md vendor overview1. 2017 md vendor overview
1. 2017 md vendor overviewTim Histalk
 

More from Tim Histalk (20)

HISsies 2020
HISsies 2020HISsies 2020
HISsies 2020
 
HISsies 2019
HISsies 2019HISsies 2019
HISsies 2019
 
HISsies 2018
HISsies 2018HISsies 2018
HISsies 2018
 
3. march 1988
3. march 19883. march 1988
3. march 1988
 
2. february 1988
2. february 19882. february 1988
2. february 1988
 
1. jan 1988
1. jan 19881. jan 1988
1. jan 1988
 
5. december 1987
5. december 19875. december 1987
5. december 1987
 
4. november 1987
4. november 19874. november 1987
4. november 1987
 
3. october 1987
3. october 19873. october 1987
3. october 1987
 
2 september 1987
2 september 19872 september 1987
2 september 1987
 
109. cerner, part 6
109. cerner, part 6109. cerner, part 6
109. cerner, part 6
 
108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5
 
107. cerner, part 4
107. cerner, part 4107. cerner, part 4
107. cerner, part 4
 
Cerner Part 3
Cerner Part 3Cerner Part 3
Cerner Part 3
 
Cerner Part 2
Cerner Part 2Cerner Part 2
Cerner Part 2
 
Cerner Part 1
Cerner Part 1Cerner Part 1
Cerner Part 1
 
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
 
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 282. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
 
1. 2017 md vendor overview
1. 2017 md vendor overview1. 2017 md vendor overview
1. 2017 md vendor overview
 
Hissies 2017
Hissies 2017Hissies 2017
Hissies 2017
 

2014 vendor overview

  • 1. 2014 HIS Vendor Revenue © 2014 by H.I.S. Professionals, LLC, all rights reserved. By Vince Ciotti, Principal HIS Professionals, LLC 1980 1990 2000 2010 2015
  • 2. HIS-tory of Vendor Revenue • If you’ve been reading print magazines in our industry along with getting far more unvarnished insights from HIStalk, you’ve probably followed our annual rankings of the leading HIS vendors in order of their annual revenue for many years: – Original credit for the idea must go to Bill Childs who created this whole niche when he started his Computers in Hospitals magazine way back in 1980 with a whopping 52 pages. • Bill’s magazines morphed & were renamed many times over the years, and subsequent rags expanded the vendor review from 25 to 100 vendors in issues running 200 pages. • Last year, the magazine we wrote our vendor review for shrunk so small (≈30 pages) they only ran our article on their web site, so this year we’re only running it on HIS-talk!
  • 3. Definitions • It’s important to define what one means by an “HIS” vendor since some of the rag’s rankings include billion-dollar firms in their top 10 (such as Dell, Phillips, CareFusion and Cognizant), that don’t even offer an HIS, which we carefully define as: - Hospital – acute care facilities are their primary market, not “just” physician practices, managed care, long term care, home health, PACS, etc. - Information – the full suite of software needed to automate a hospital: both financial and clinical systems. Thus, specialty vendor like SCC & Sunquest for LIS and Oracle for ERP are excluded. - Systems - the complete package of hardware, software and implementation. This excludes giants like Dell, CSC, IBM Leidos, HP, etc, who primarily offer hardware and/or consulting.
  • 4. 2014 HIS Vendors Revenue • We obtained the figures from published earnings reports and SEC filings (K-10s). Estimates had to be made for companies that are privately held (e.g.: Medhost), or are a part of giants whose “Healthcare” revenue includes many non-IT products (e.g.: GE).
  • 5. 2014 Shockers • There are some surprises in this table that deserve highlighting: - Cerner – jumped ahead of McKesson to be the #1 vendor in the HIS industry by revenue for the first time in the firm’s 35-year history. And that’s without the ≈$1.2B they will gain from Siemen’s client base (which closed in Feb of this year)! - Meditech – actually declined in revenue by 11% from 2013. Their annual report last year was delayed for many months due to some “booking” issues, so maybe it’s an accounting anomaly, but this is their first drop in revenue in decades… - Slow Growth – many vendors showed small growth compared to previous years, including McKesson (5%), Epic (4%), Allscripts (1%), and CPSI (2%).
  • 6. Whassup? • Overall, the revenue total for these top 12 HIS vendors only increased by 5%, compared to previous years when the total revenue increased as much as 17% as illustrated below:
  • 7. Meaningful Abuse!? • The reason for this relatively flat market can be found in the HITECH Act – our consulting firm’s experience sums it up well: - One of our major product lines is system selections, and in the boom years of 2009 to 2011 when hospitals were buying EHRs to earn MU $s , we did 10-12 searches per year, and I bought (too) many of these rare collector motorcycles: - From 2012 to 2014, we shrunk down to 2-3 searches per year as hospitals stayed with their current vendor’s EHR (no matter how poor) struggling to attest for Stage 1 & 2 MU criteria. Our business has been so slow I am now selling my most valuable bike to try to make ends meet! - HIS vendors have seen this slowdown in new sales too, as I’ve heard many Sales executives lament over the past few years...
  • 8. Next 3 Weeks • We’ll delve into the details of the 12 vendors’ performance over then next 3 episodes of this review, broken down by the three major HIS market segments (in terms of beds and revenue): – Large – those vendors whose derive the majority of their revenue from large hospitals over 300 beds in size, including many AMCs & Multi-IDNS: Cerner, Epic, Allscripts & GE. – Mid-Size – vendors whose target market includes mainly mid- size hospitals of 100 to 300 beds in size, including Meditech (all 3), McKesson’s Paragon, NTT Data and QuadraMed. – Small – vendors whose client base consists of mostly under 100 bed facilities, including CAH (Critical Access Hospitals) of under 25 beds: CPSI, Medhost, Healthland and NextGen. • Any questions, comments, or offers on my Honda, please contact: Vince Ciotti, vciotti@hispros.com, 505.466.4958