SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
2014 HIS Vendor Revenue
© 2014 by H.I.S. Professionals, LLC, all rights reserved.
By Vince Ciotti, Principal
HIS Professionals, LLC
1980 1990 2000 2010 2015
HIS-tory of Vendor Revenue
• If you’ve been reading print magazines in our industry along with
getting far more unvarnished insights from HIStalk, you’ve
probably followed our annual rankings of the leading HIS
vendors in order of their annual revenue for many years:
– Original credit for the idea must go to Bill Childs who created
this whole media when he started his Computers in Hospitals
magazine in 1980 with a whopping 52 page first issue.
• Bill’s magazines morphed & were renamed
many times over the years, and subsequent
rags expanded the vendor review from 25 to
100 vendors in issues running 200+ pages.
• Last year, the magazine we wrote our vendor
review for had shrunk so small (≈30 pages)
they only ran our article on their web site, so
this year we’re only running it on HIS-talk!
Definitions
• It’s important to define what one means by an “H.I.S.” vendor
since some of HIT rag’s rankings include billion-dollar firms in
their top 10 like Dell, Phillips, CareFusion and Cognizant, that
don’t really offer an HIS. We define “HIS Vendors” as:
- Hospital – acute care facilities are their primary
market, not “just” physician practices, managed
care, long term care, home health, PACS, etc.
- Information – the full suite of apps needed to
automate a hospital: both financial and clinical
systems. Thus, specialty vendor like SCC (Soft) &
Sunquest for LIS and Oracle for ERP are excluded.
- Systems - the complete package of hardware,
software and implementation. This excludes
giants like Dell, CSC, IBM, Leidos, HP, etc, who
only offer hardware and/or consulting.
2014 HIS Vendors Revenue
• We obtained the figures from published earnings reports and
SEC filings (K-10s). Estimates had to be made for companies that
are privately held (e.g.: Medhost), or are a part of giants whose
“healthcare” revenue includes many non-IT products (e.g.: GE).
2014 HIS Vendors Revenue
• This bar chart illustrates the enormous difference in $ size
between the large-hospital giants & small-hospital vendors:
2014 Shockers
• There are some surprises in this table that deserve highlighting:
- Cerner – jumped ahead of McKesson to be the
#1 vendor in the HIS industry by revenue for the
first time in the firm’s 35-year history. And that’s
before the ≈$1.2B they will gain from Siemen’s
client base (which closed in Feb of this year)!
- Meditech – actually declined in revenue by 11%
from 2013. Their annual report last year was
delayed for many months due to some “booking”
issues, so maybe it’s an accounting anomaly, but
this is their 2nd straight drop in revenue in 2 years.
- Slow Growth – many vendors showed small growth
compared to previous years, including McKesson
(5%), Epic (4%), Allscripts (1%), and CPSI (2%).
Whassup?
• Overall, the revenue total for the top 12 HIS vendors only went
up by 5%, compared to previous years (eg: 2011) when the total
revenue increased as much as 17% as illustrated below:
17%
5%
Meaningful Abuse!?
• The reason for this relatively flat market can be found in the
HITECH Act – our consulting firm’s experience sums it up well:
- One of our major product lines is system
selections; we’ve done over 165 over the past 28
years. In the boom years of 2009 to 2011 when
hospitals were buying EHRs to first earn MU $s ,
we did 10-12 searches per year, and I bought
(too) many of these rare collector motorcycles:
- From 2012 to 2014, we shrunk down to 2-3 searches per
year as hospitals stayed with their current vendor’s EHR
(no matter how poor) struggling to attest for Stage 1 & 2
MU criteria. Our business has been so slow I am now
selling my most valuable bike to try to make ends meet!
- HIS vendors have seen this slowdown in new sales too, as I’ve
heard many sales executives lament over the past few years. We
all hope hospitals will soon look to replace legacy systems soon…
Next 3 Weeks
• We’ll delve into the details of the 12 vendors’ performance over
then next 3 episodes of this review, broken down by the three
major HIS market segments (in terms of beds and revenue):
– Large – those vendors whose derive the majority of their
revenue from large hospitals over 300 beds in size, including
large AMCs & Multi-IDNS: Cerner, Epic, Allscripts & GE.
– Mid-Size – vendors whose target market includes mainly mid-
size hospitals of 100 to 300 beds in size, including Meditech
(all 3), McKesson’s Paragon, NTT Data and QuadraMed.
– Small – vendors whose client base consists of mostly under
100 bed facilities, including CAH (Critical Access Hospitals) of
under 25 beds: CPSI, Medhost, Healthland and NextGen.
• Any questions, comments, or offers on my Honda, please contact:
Vince Ciotti, vciotti@hispros.com, 505.466.4958

More Related Content

What's hot

124. system longevity
124. system longevity124. system longevity
124. system longevityTim Histalk
 
1. 2016 vendor review b
1. 2016 vendor review b1. 2016 vendor review b
1. 2016 vendor review bTim Histalk
 
3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendorsTim Histalk
 
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 302. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 30Tim Histalk
 
Buyers seminar hi story
Buyers seminar hi storyBuyers seminar hi story
Buyers seminar hi storyTim Histalk
 
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-43. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4Tim Histalk
 
1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review cTim Histalk
 
4. 2018 low end vendors 4-6
4. 2018 low end vendors 4-64. 2018 low end vendors 4-6
4. 2018 low end vendors 4-6Tim Histalk
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 23
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 231. 2018 top his vendors 3 23
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 23Tim Histalk
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 261. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 26Tim Histalk
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 251. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 25Tim Histalk
 
1. 2017 top his vendors
1. 2017 top his vendors1. 2017 top his vendors
1. 2017 top his vendorsTim Histalk
 
2. 2017 macro vendors b
2. 2017 macro vendors b2. 2017 macro vendors b
2. 2017 macro vendors bTim Histalk
 
2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendorsBarry Mathis
 
2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendorsTim Histalk
 
2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendorsBarry Mathis
 
1. 2016 md vendor overview
1. 2016 md vendor overview1. 2016 md vendor overview
1. 2016 md vendor overviewTim Histalk
 
4. 2016 small vendors
4. 2016 small vendors4. 2016 small vendors
4. 2016 small vendorsBarry Mathis
 

What's hot (18)

124. system longevity
124. system longevity124. system longevity
124. system longevity
 
1. 2016 vendor review b
1. 2016 vendor review b1. 2016 vendor review b
1. 2016 vendor review b
 
3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors
 
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 302. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
2. 2018 macro vendors 3 30
 
Buyers seminar hi story
Buyers seminar hi storyBuyers seminar hi story
Buyers seminar hi story
 
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-43. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
3. 2018 mid range vendors 4-4
 
1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c
 
4. 2018 low end vendors 4-6
4. 2018 low end vendors 4-64. 2018 low end vendors 4-6
4. 2018 low end vendors 4-6
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 23
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 231. 2018 top his vendors 3 23
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 23
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 261. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 26
 
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 251. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
1. 2018 top his vendors 3 25
 
1. 2017 top his vendors
1. 2017 top his vendors1. 2017 top his vendors
1. 2017 top his vendors
 
2. 2017 macro vendors b
2. 2017 macro vendors b2. 2017 macro vendors b
2. 2017 macro vendors b
 
2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors
 
2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors
 
2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors2. 2014 macro vendors
2. 2014 macro vendors
 
1. 2016 md vendor overview
1. 2016 md vendor overview1. 2016 md vendor overview
1. 2016 md vendor overview
 
4. 2016 small vendors
4. 2016 small vendors4. 2016 small vendors
4. 2016 small vendors
 

Similar to 1. 2014 vendor overview(1)

1. 2014 vendor overview
1. 2014 vendor overview1. 2014 vendor overview
1. 2014 vendor overviewTim Histalk
 
2014 vendor overview
2014 vendor overview2014 vendor overview
2014 vendor overviewTim Histalk
 
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
1. 2017 Top HIS VendorsElise Ames
 
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendorsHispros
 
1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review cBarry Mathis
 
2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendorsBarry Mathis
 
2. 2017 Macro Vendors
2. 2017 Macro Vendors 2. 2017 Macro Vendors
2. 2017 Macro Vendors Hispros
 
3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendorsBarry Mathis
 
4. 2017 low end vendors
4. 2017 low end vendors4. 2017 low end vendors
4. 2017 low end vendorsTim Histalk
 
52. stock crashes
52. stock crashes52. stock crashes
52. stock crashesHispros
 
Venator Funds - February 2017 Performance
Venator Funds - February 2017 PerformanceVenator Funds - February 2017 Performance
Venator Funds - February 2017 PerformanceBrian Viveiros
 
61. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 361. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 3Hispros
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendorsBarry Mathis
 
2. origins & leading reviewer
2. origins & leading reviewer2. origins & leading reviewer
2. origins & leading reviewerTim Histalk
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendorsBarry Mathis
 

Similar to 1. 2014 vendor overview(1) (18)

1. 2014 vendor overview
1. 2014 vendor overview1. 2014 vendor overview
1. 2014 vendor overview
 
2014 vendor overview
2014 vendor overview2014 vendor overview
2014 vendor overview
 
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
1. 2017 Top HIS Vendors
 
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
1. 2017 Top 10 HIS vendors
 
1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c1. 2016 vendor review c
1. 2016 vendor review c
 
2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors2. 2016 macro vendors
2. 2016 macro vendors
 
2. 2017 Macro Vendors
2. 2017 Macro Vendors 2. 2017 Macro Vendors
2. 2017 Macro Vendors
 
3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors3. 2016 mid range vendors
3. 2016 mid range vendors
 
4. 2017 low end vendors
4. 2017 low end vendors4. 2017 low end vendors
4. 2017 low end vendors
 
1. august 1987
1. august 19871. august 1987
1. august 1987
 
52. stock crashes
52. stock crashes52. stock crashes
52. stock crashes
 
Venator Funds - February 2017 Performance
Venator Funds - February 2017 PerformanceVenator Funds - February 2017 Performance
Venator Funds - February 2017 Performance
 
61. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 361. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 3
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors
 
2. origins & leading reviewer
2. origins & leading reviewer2. origins & leading reviewer
2. origins & leading reviewer
 
61. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 361. hms, part 3
61. hms, part 3
 
Shillington
ShillingtonShillington
Shillington
 
3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors3. 2014 mid range vendors
3. 2014 mid range vendors
 

More from Tim Histalk

2. february 1988
2. february 19882. february 1988
2. february 1988Tim Histalk
 
5. december 1987
5. december 19875. december 1987
5. december 1987Tim Histalk
 
4. november 1987
4. november 19874. november 1987
4. november 1987Tim Histalk
 
2 september 1987
2 september 19872 september 1987
2 september 1987Tim Histalk
 
109. cerner, part 6
109. cerner, part 6109. cerner, part 6
109. cerner, part 6Tim Histalk
 
108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5Tim Histalk
 
107. cerner, part 4
107. cerner, part 4107. cerner, part 4
107. cerner, part 4Tim Histalk
 
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 bTim Histalk
 
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 282. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28Tim Histalk
 
1. 2017 md vendor overview
1. 2017 md vendor overview1. 2017 md vendor overview
1. 2017 md vendor overviewTim Histalk
 

More from Tim Histalk (20)

HISsies 2020
HISsies 2020HISsies 2020
HISsies 2020
 
HISsies 2019
HISsies 2019HISsies 2019
HISsies 2019
 
HISsies 2018
HISsies 2018HISsies 2018
HISsies 2018
 
3. march 1988
3. march 19883. march 1988
3. march 1988
 
2. february 1988
2. february 19882. february 1988
2. february 1988
 
1. jan 1988
1. jan 19881. jan 1988
1. jan 1988
 
5. december 1987
5. december 19875. december 1987
5. december 1987
 
4. november 1987
4. november 19874. november 1987
4. november 1987
 
3. october 1987
3. october 19873. october 1987
3. october 1987
 
2 september 1987
2 september 19872 september 1987
2 september 1987
 
109. cerner, part 6
109. cerner, part 6109. cerner, part 6
109. cerner, part 6
 
108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5108. cerner, part 5
108. cerner, part 5
 
107. cerner, part 4
107. cerner, part 4107. cerner, part 4
107. cerner, part 4
 
Cerner Part 3
Cerner Part 3Cerner Part 3
Cerner Part 3
 
Cerner Part 2
Cerner Part 2Cerner Part 2
Cerner Part 2
 
Cerner Part 1
Cerner Part 1Cerner Part 1
Cerner Part 1
 
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
3. 2017 other md vendors 5 5 b
 
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 282. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
2. 2017 top 10 md vendors 4 28
 
1. 2017 md vendor overview
1. 2017 md vendor overview1. 2017 md vendor overview
1. 2017 md vendor overview
 
Hissies 2017
Hissies 2017Hissies 2017
Hissies 2017
 

1. 2014 vendor overview(1)

  • 1. 2014 HIS Vendor Revenue © 2014 by H.I.S. Professionals, LLC, all rights reserved. By Vince Ciotti, Principal HIS Professionals, LLC 1980 1990 2000 2010 2015
  • 2. HIS-tory of Vendor Revenue • If you’ve been reading print magazines in our industry along with getting far more unvarnished insights from HIStalk, you’ve probably followed our annual rankings of the leading HIS vendors in order of their annual revenue for many years: – Original credit for the idea must go to Bill Childs who created this whole media when he started his Computers in Hospitals magazine in 1980 with a whopping 52 page first issue. • Bill’s magazines morphed & were renamed many times over the years, and subsequent rags expanded the vendor review from 25 to 100 vendors in issues running 200+ pages. • Last year, the magazine we wrote our vendor review for had shrunk so small (≈30 pages) they only ran our article on their web site, so this year we’re only running it on HIS-talk!
  • 3. Definitions • It’s important to define what one means by an “H.I.S.” vendor since some of HIT rag’s rankings include billion-dollar firms in their top 10 like Dell, Phillips, CareFusion and Cognizant, that don’t really offer an HIS. We define “HIS Vendors” as: - Hospital – acute care facilities are their primary market, not “just” physician practices, managed care, long term care, home health, PACS, etc. - Information – the full suite of apps needed to automate a hospital: both financial and clinical systems. Thus, specialty vendor like SCC (Soft) & Sunquest for LIS and Oracle for ERP are excluded. - Systems - the complete package of hardware, software and implementation. This excludes giants like Dell, CSC, IBM, Leidos, HP, etc, who only offer hardware and/or consulting.
  • 4. 2014 HIS Vendors Revenue • We obtained the figures from published earnings reports and SEC filings (K-10s). Estimates had to be made for companies that are privately held (e.g.: Medhost), or are a part of giants whose “healthcare” revenue includes many non-IT products (e.g.: GE).
  • 5. 2014 HIS Vendors Revenue • This bar chart illustrates the enormous difference in $ size between the large-hospital giants & small-hospital vendors:
  • 6. 2014 Shockers • There are some surprises in this table that deserve highlighting: - Cerner – jumped ahead of McKesson to be the #1 vendor in the HIS industry by revenue for the first time in the firm’s 35-year history. And that’s before the ≈$1.2B they will gain from Siemen’s client base (which closed in Feb of this year)! - Meditech – actually declined in revenue by 11% from 2013. Their annual report last year was delayed for many months due to some “booking” issues, so maybe it’s an accounting anomaly, but this is their 2nd straight drop in revenue in 2 years. - Slow Growth – many vendors showed small growth compared to previous years, including McKesson (5%), Epic (4%), Allscripts (1%), and CPSI (2%).
  • 7. Whassup? • Overall, the revenue total for the top 12 HIS vendors only went up by 5%, compared to previous years (eg: 2011) when the total revenue increased as much as 17% as illustrated below: 17% 5%
  • 8. Meaningful Abuse!? • The reason for this relatively flat market can be found in the HITECH Act – our consulting firm’s experience sums it up well: - One of our major product lines is system selections; we’ve done over 165 over the past 28 years. In the boom years of 2009 to 2011 when hospitals were buying EHRs to first earn MU $s , we did 10-12 searches per year, and I bought (too) many of these rare collector motorcycles: - From 2012 to 2014, we shrunk down to 2-3 searches per year as hospitals stayed with their current vendor’s EHR (no matter how poor) struggling to attest for Stage 1 & 2 MU criteria. Our business has been so slow I am now selling my most valuable bike to try to make ends meet! - HIS vendors have seen this slowdown in new sales too, as I’ve heard many sales executives lament over the past few years. We all hope hospitals will soon look to replace legacy systems soon…
  • 9. Next 3 Weeks • We’ll delve into the details of the 12 vendors’ performance over then next 3 episodes of this review, broken down by the three major HIS market segments (in terms of beds and revenue): – Large – those vendors whose derive the majority of their revenue from large hospitals over 300 beds in size, including large AMCs & Multi-IDNS: Cerner, Epic, Allscripts & GE. – Mid-Size – vendors whose target market includes mainly mid- size hospitals of 100 to 300 beds in size, including Meditech (all 3), McKesson’s Paragon, NTT Data and QuadraMed. – Small – vendors whose client base consists of mostly under 100 bed facilities, including CAH (Critical Access Hospitals) of under 25 beds: CPSI, Medhost, Healthland and NextGen. • Any questions, comments, or offers on my Honda, please contact: Vince Ciotti, vciotti@hispros.com, 505.466.4958