Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Japan presentation june 2nd final

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
English esif
English esif
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 75 Ad

Japan presentation june 2nd final

Download to read offline

Symposium: Toward a Society in which Children Can Grow Up in Families
Building on the Experience of Promoting Family Protective Care in Central and Eastern Europe
http://www.nippon-foundation.or.jp/en/news/articles/2015/7.html

Japan has announced a prefectural-level plan that seeks to raise the percentage of children requiring protective care who are raised in families to 30% by 2030. At this symposium, Georgette Mulheir, who as chief executive of the London-based, international NGO Lumos, has been named one of the world’s 30 most influential social workers, will discuss her experiences promoting family protective care in Central and Eastern European countries including Moldavia, the Czech Republic, and Bulgaria.

Symposium: Toward a Society in which Children Can Grow Up in Families
Building on the Experience of Promoting Family Protective Care in Central and Eastern Europe
http://www.nippon-foundation.or.jp/en/news/articles/2015/7.html

Japan has announced a prefectural-level plan that seeks to raise the percentage of children requiring protective care who are raised in families to 30% by 2030. At this symposium, Georgette Mulheir, who as chief executive of the London-based, international NGO Lumos, has been named one of the world’s 30 most influential social workers, will discuss her experiences promoting family protective care in Central and Eastern European countries including Moldavia, the Czech Republic, and Bulgaria.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Japan presentation june 2nd final (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Japan presentation june 2nd final

  1. 1. Georgette Mulheir Chief Executive, Lumos Toward a Society in which Children Can Grow Up in Families Building on the Experience of Promoting Family Protective Care in Central and Eastern Europe
  2. 2. Institutionalisation of children a global problem
  3. 3. Institutions are established to care for ‘orphans’ More than 90% in Europe are not orphans (overall 80% globally)
  4. 4. • Science proves the harm caused by institutions • Dramatic impact on Early Brain Development • Increased risk of all forms of abuse • Increased mortality risk, especially disabled children • Extremely poor outcomes for children
  5. 5. The harm caused by institutionalisation These images from the Bucharest study show the decreased electrical activity in an institutionalised child’s brain. The colour orange indicates high activity. EEG level: An institutionalised child EEG level: A never-institutionalised child
  6. 6. Adults who spent their childhood in institutions were:  10 times more likely than their peers to be involved in prostitution  40 times more likely to have a criminal record  500 times more likely to commit suicide
  7. 7. Outcomes for children with disabilities One study found that of children under three in institutions across Europe: • 0.29% of children without disabilities died • 28% of children with disabilities died Children with disabilities were 100 times more likely to die in the institution than those without disabilities.
  8. 8. Why are the outcomes for children so poor? • Children cannot form an attachment – essential to healthy development • High personnel costs mean limited time with children • Impossible to respond to individual needs • Abusive methods of behaviour control • Isolated from the community – children do not learn skills to survive in the outside world • No family/social network when leave institution • Desperate for love and affection – open to abuse and exploitation
  9. 9. The scale of the problem European Union: 150,000 Russia: 600,000 Ukraine: 120,000 Brazil 50,000There are eight million children in institutions around the world
  10. 10. Global picture in numbers
  11. 11. 5.5 16 49 21 39 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 England Japan Czech Republic Bulgaria Moldova Rate of children in institutions per 10,000 rate of children 0-18
  12. 12. 0 0 7 38 29 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 England Sweden Japan Czech Republic Bulgaria Rate of babies in institutions per 10,000 children 0-3 0 0
  13. 13. Successful deinstitutionalisat ion includes…
  14. 14. Developing community services to replace institutions
  15. 15. Preventing children from entering institutions
  16. 16. Removing all children currently resident – to family based care
  17. 17. Ring-fencing and transferring resources
  18. 18. Capacity and expertise to manage major change
  19. 19. Changing attitudes, polices and practices
  20. 20. Empowering children and families to take a lead role in changing attitudes and practices
  21. 21. Lumos’ work at national-level
  22. 22. An example from Moldova
  23. 23. Number of children in institutions in Moldova 2007-2014
  24. 24. Number of children in the institution in Floresti from 2007 - 2014
  25. 25. Number of children in institutions in Ialoveni County from 2007- 2014
  26. 26. Number of children in institution no. 2 in Chisinau from 2007 - 2014
  27. 27. Number of children in the institution in Orhei from 2007 - 2014
  28. 28. Number of children in foster care in Moldova 282 372 421 440 581 660 735 850 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
  29. 29. Number of children in foster care in Ialoveni region 3 6 6 6 6 12 18 28 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
  30. 30. Number of children in foster care in Floresti region 9 9 13 13 19 37 45 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
  31. 31. Number of children with disabilities in Moldova educated in inclusive vs segregated schools 3148 2549 2300 1807 1538 1253 1604 2258 4495 7660 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Segregated residential special schools Inclusive mainstream schools
  32. 32. 51%The number of children with disabilities separated from their families and living in residential special schools has reduced by 51% in five years 511%The number of children with disabilities educated in inclusive mainstream schools has increased by 511% in five years
  33. 33. Cost savings over time -example from Moldova
  34. 34. Cost/child/year in different placements (in Euros) 4100 3881 3382 475 831 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Institution Small group home Foster care Family support Inclusive education Cost per child per year
  35. 35. Cost/child over 12 years (in Euros) 49200 46572 40584 1425 9972 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Institution Small group home Foster care Family support Inclusive education Cost per child over 12 year period
  36. 36. Two care options for 13,000 children 13,000 children in institutions = €639,600,000 13,000 children cared for in the community =€79,405,950 Only 12% of expenditure on institutions Savings invested have: introduced inclusive education in 40% of schools in the country Reduced infant mortality from 14/1000 to 9/1000
  37. 37. An example from Bulgaria
  38. 38. Number of children in institutions in Bulgaria 6730 5695 4755 4122 3113 2721 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
  39. 39. Number of babies in institutions in Bulgaria 2455 2319 2087 1204 975 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Number of babies in institutions
  40. 40. Number of children in foster care in Bulgaria 221 391 580 1943 2304 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Number of children in foster care
  41. 41. Admissions to institutions for children in Bulgaria 3170 2930 2855 2708 2099 1044 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Admissions to institutions in Bulgaria
  42. 42. % of admissions of children in Foster Care vs. Residential care in Bulgaria [値]% [値]% [値]% [値]% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2012 2013 % in Foster Care % in residential institutions
  43. 43. An example from the Czech Republic
  44. 44. Number of children in institutions in the Czech Republic
  45. 45. Admissions to institutions for children in the Czech Republic
  46. 46. 3.1 3.8 4.8 5.1 5.6 6.2 6.6 6.7 6.8 8.1 8.4 9.0 10.9 14.4 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Královéhradecký County Pardubický County Olomoucký County Jihomoravský County Plzeňský County Zlínský County Czech Republic (nationally) Středočeský County County vysočina Liberecký County Moravsko-slezský County Jihočeský County Karlovarský County Ústecký County Admissions to children homes per 10,000 children aged 3-18 in 20012/2013
  47. 47. 4,613 4,884 5,174 5,727 6,722 7,021 7,463 7,651 8,606 9,771 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Number of children in foster care and guardianship in the Czech Republic Foster care
  48. 48. 0 3 29 108 302 498 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2011/01/01 2012/01/01 2013/01/01 2014/01/01 2015/01/01 NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN SHORT-TERM FOSTER CARE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
  49. 49. Capacity of community-based family support services has grown significantly in recent years 76 322 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2006 2014 Number of registered social- activation services for families with children in the Czech Republic 20 200 0 50 100 150 200 250 2006 2014 Estimated number of families that can be supported by social- activation services for families with children in Pardubice country
  50. 50. Increased capacity in preventive social work has already had impact on Children‘s Homes Admissions to children homes in Pardubice county have decreased significantly No preschool child admitted to children‘s home in Pardubice in 2012/2013 56 17 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 2004/2005 2012/2013 Number of admissions to children's homes in Pardubice county 16 18 18 18 8 10 6 14 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Admissions of preschool children to Children's homes in Pardubice county
  51. 51. Capacity of community-based support services to families with children with disabilities has also been increasing… 2,703 2,984 2,933 3,779 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 2009 2010 2011 2012 Number of users of early intervention (raná péče) in the Czech Republic
  52. 52. Increased capacity of community-based support services to families with children with disabilities has led to almost 30% decrease in numbers of children in disability care homes in 4 years 1063 926 834 769 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 2009 2010 2011 2012 Number of children in disability care homes
  53. 53. Costs of different types of service/placement 1 040 (29 tis.) 8 850 (245 tis.) 15 700 (430 tis.) 10 900 (299 tis.) 22 400 (614 tis.) 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Community-based family support service Long term foster care Short term foster care Children's home Baby institution (Pardubice county) Cost for one placement/bed per year (in Euro and CZK)
  54. 54. Cost of the ‘average’ case: Placement in baby home for 4 months Placement in short-term foster care for 4 months 2 years of community-based family support services 7 467 (204 tis.) 5 233 (144 tis.) 2 080 (57 tis.)
  55. 55. Community-based system: alternative placements to 85 beds in Baby homes 8 358 (9 820) 9 42 (1 163) 24 25 (684) 4 6 (168) 2 5 (141) 26 408 (11 185) 8 71 (1 940) 4 63 (1 721) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Number of placements Yearly costs in thousands EURO/CZK Alternative placements/services - numbers and costs Foster care for children with disabilities Long term foster care Short term foster care Home with support of early intervention and family support Home with support of early intervention service Home with family support
  56. 56. Annual budget for current and new systems 1 748 (47 900) 979 (26 825) 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 85 beds in baby homes Community-based system Yearly costs for placements in baby homes and alternative placements (thousands EURO and CZK)
  57. 57. The new system will be able to help more children for the same budget The community based system costs less approx. 770 thousand EURO (21 100 tis. Kč) could be saved annually approx. 740 families could be supported by community- based family support services with this money 100 100 740 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 85 beds in baby homes Community-based system Children served with the same budget Children yearly served thanks to the beds in baby homes Children in the community supported thanks to lower costs of alternative placements/services Therefore more children can be helped with the same budget
  58. 58. Types of Fostering 1 There are various types of foster care available: Emergency Where children need somewhere safe to stay for a few days Short –Term Where carers look after children for a few weeks or months, while plans are in made for the child’s future. Short –Breaks Where children with disabilities, special needs or behavioural difficulties enjoy a short stay on a pre-planned regular basis with a foster family, and their parents have a short break for themselves. Remand Fostering Where young people are remanded by the court to the care of a specially trained foster carer.
  59. 59. Types of Fostering 2 Long –Term and Permanent It is not appropriate for some children who have regular contact with their own families to be adopted and they may be placed with long term foster carers “Family and Friends” or “Kinship” Fostering Where children who are looked after by a local authority are cared for by people they already know. This can be very beneficial for children. Private Fostering Where the parents make a private arrangement for the child to stay with someone else who is not a close relative and has no parental responsibilities, and the child stays with the private foster carer for more than 27 days. The local authority must be informed about the arrangements and visit to check the child’s welfare.
  60. 60. Types of Fostering 3 Mother and Baby Placements These are specialist placements with carers who can offer a parent and her young baby accommodation. The carer will provide stability, advice and the help needed to enable the mother to develop the skills required to be a parent. The carer may also be involved in the assessment of the parent’s ability to meet the child’s needs independently in the long term.
  61. 61. Types of Fostering 4 Treatment Foster Care • This is specialist foster care to meet the needs of children and young people with emotional difficulties and displaying challenging behaviour. • Different models used including Multi-Dimensional Treatment Foster Care and Keep • Both children and foster carers are provided with high levels of support including therapeutic support and support available 24 hours a day • For older children this model can be an alternative to residential care for children who have found it hard to settle in mainstream foster placements
  62. 62. Planning the transfer of resources
  63. 63. A range of community based services is needed to replace institutions Most are cheaper Some are more expensive
  64. 64. Why does an institutional system cost so much? 24-hour care - many personnel Building maintenance costs More children in institutions than need to be in care Financial incentives to bring more children in (budget per child)
  65. 65. Belief that institutions are an ‘economy of scale’: Put all the children together and it will cost less However the evidence suggests otherwise
  66. 66. Universal:Children’s Centres – around £600 per user Parenting programme (e.g. Triple P)- £900- 1,000 per PEIP -£1200- 3000 per Family Nurse Partnerships, Family Functional Therapy &KEEP- £3000 per family a year Multi-Systematic Therapy- £3-10,000 per intervention Family Intervention Services- £8-20,000 per family per year Child looked after in foster care -£25,000 per year placement costs (plus additional services) Multi-dimensional Treatment Foster Care- £70,000 per year for total package It is vital that children and young people receive the right services at the right time. These figures are intended to be illustrative Child looked after in children's home - £125,000+ per year placement costs Child Looked after in secure accommodation - £134,000+ per year placement costs Costs increase as children get older. Increasing related costs such as healthcare and the criminal justice system make it clear joined up working is a core part of cost effectiveness Cost Universal: Schools - £5400 per pupil CostperChild/Family Severity of assessed need Information Services - Around £34 via telephone helpline Around £2 via digital services High relative costs of intervention for small group of looked after children and those on the edge of care
  67. 67. Institutions have three types of resources that should be reinvested in community services: Financial (annual budget and donations) Human (institution personnel) Material (buildings, land, vehicles, equipment)
  68. 68. If not, as numbers in institutions reduce, resources disappear from the system…
  69. 69. Outcomes
  70. 70. Improved development following move from institution to foster care 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Height Walking Speech Cognitive Average/above when placed Average/above now
  71. 71. Changes in behaviour on moving from institution to foster care 0 20 40 60 Enuresis Food issues Nightmares Lying Stealing Aggression Self-harm Very frequent now Very frequent when placement began
  72. 72. Research among homeless population in Prague*: • High numbers of homeless young people with history of institutional care • Almost no cases of young people who were in Foster care *Source: PRUDKÝ, L. a ŠMÍDOVÁ, M. Kudy ke dnu: analýza charakteristik klientů Naděje, o.s., středisko Praha, Bolzanova. Vyd. 1. Praha: Socioklub, [2010] dotisk, 135 s. Sešity pro sociální politiku. ISBN 9788086140681. Outcomes of residential vs foster care in The Czech Republic
  73. 73. Belief that material conditions can replace a family’s love and nurturing… - An Institution Director “Our children have everything they need: their own rooms, TV, internet, air-conditioning and a mini-bar. They have the best teachers. They visit the US, Austria, Switzerland. What would they have if they were at home?”
  74. 74. The difference it makes https://vimeo.com/126264012
  75. 75. Thank y u Georgette Mulheir Georgette.Mulheir@wearelumos.org +44 (0)20 7253 6464

×