SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 64
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Demultiple
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
At the end of this Session, you will be able to:
• Define the terms primary energy and multiple energy as used in data
processing.
• Define the terms multiple order and period as used in processing.
• Define the following water bottom multiple, free surface multiple, peg-leg
multiple and internal multiple
• Produce a diagram that shows the travel path of each of the following
multiple types: water bottom multiple, free surface multiple, peg-leg
multiple, internal multiple
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Multiples are events reflected more than once
Multiples hinder interpretation
False events
Incorrect amplitudes
Multiples can be very difficult……
to identify
to remove
Primary and Multiple energy
Primary energy is energy which has been reflected only once, and so is a
true image of the reflector from which it arose
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
General Properties of Multiples
• Low velocity (high moveout)
– Velocity increases with depth
• High amplitude
– less geometric spreading
• Periodic
– Repeated cycles in horizontal layers
• Predictable
– From primaries
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Multiple Order
• This is the number of additional bounces that a seismic wave has
undergone in addition to the original primary reflection.
• Therefore, a second-order multiple is a signal that has undergone a
primary reflection plus two additional bounces off the same layer.
P 1st 2nd
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Multiple Period
• This is the time between each successive bounce of the multiple
series.
• Multiple periods are generally classified into three types:
1. Short
2. Intermediate
3. Long
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Multiple Period
• Short period multiples generally have a period of
100 or 200 msec.
• Long period multiples generally have a period of
1/2 second or longer.
• Intermediate period multiples fall directly between
these two types.
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Order of Multiples
Primary
1st order
multiple
2nd order
multiple
multiple
period
A B C
Event recorded, dependent on receiver position:
B - First order multiple
C - Second order multiple
A - Primary
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Water Bottom Multiple
Water-bottom
multiple
• Extremely common source of multiple reflection.
• This is because both the water/air interface and the
water bottom are characterized by having a large change in
acoustic impedance.
• High proportion of the seismic energy is trapped in the
water layer, and little signal is transmitted into the earth.
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Water Bottom Multiple
The reflection coefficient of the water/air
interface approximates to -1, so as can be seen,
the polarity of the signal changes after each
reflection from this interface (ie. there is a 180°
phase change at each reflection).
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Pegleg Multiple
Water-bottom
Pegleg multiple
Pegleg
Multiple
• The water layer acts as a source of
multiple reflections for primary reflections
which arise within the earth itself.
• The generated multiples are referred to
as peg-leg multiples, because of their
characteristic ray paths.
• Their paths are asymmetric.
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Free Surface Multiple
Free-surface
multiple
• An impedance contrast occurs at the land/air
boundary in land acquisition just as at the water/air
boundary in marine acquisition.
• The reflection coefficient of the air/land surface
interface approximates to -1, so the polarity of the
signal changes after each reflection from this
interface (ie. there is a 180° phase change at each
reflection).
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Internal Multiple
Inter-bed or
internal multiple
• The only prerequisite for
multiples to occur is that there
should be at least two strong
reflectors.
• Multiples may arise within
the earth at any interface,
provided that the two
reflectors have "large"
reflection coefficients
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Removal of multiples
The removal of multiples generally relies on either or both of two
recognisable characteristics.
• Multiples will generally go on and on,
repeating with the same time interval and
gradually decreasing in amplitude.
• Multiples will generally appear on our
CDP gathers with a velocity slower than
the primary velocity at the same time.
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Primary and Multiple Velocity
• As the primary and multiple energy has both travelled through the
same layer the multiple just spent longer in the layer, then what’s their
velocity relationship?
P 1st 2nd
They have the same velocity
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Velocity
1st order
multiple
multiple
period
We can recognise a multiple as having
the same velocity as the primary.
On semblance displays multiples will
appear directly below primaries.
Velocity should increase the further into
the earth you go so multiples will have a
slower velocity than the events
surrounding them.
They will appear to be under corrected on
your cmp gathers.
Constant Velocity Stack (CVS)
2nd order
multiple
primary
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
CMP gather and stack after NMO
correction using primary velocity
function
CMP stack of nmo corrected
gathers will result in
enhancement of the primary
energy and degradation of
the multiple energy.
Stack
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Stack
 Easy
 Cheap
 Improves S/N
 Incomplete multiple suppression
 Output is poststack - limited AVO available
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
CMP gather and stack after NMO
correction using primary velocity
function
Removing the near traces from
our cmp gather results in further
degradation of the multiples.
As the multiple event appears
flattest on the near traces and
so stacks up best for the near
traces.
Near Trace Mute
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
CMP gathers after NMO correction using
multiple velocity function
primary
multiple
1. The normal procedure is to
overcorrect the primaries
while leaving the multiples
undercorrected.
2. Transform to FK domain.
3. Remove all events at K > 0
i.e. all multiple energy muted.
primary
multiple
FK demultiple
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
FK demultiple
x
t
CMP gather f
k
FT
Mute
K +
-
x
t
NMO
NMO correction
Multiple
Primary
Using velocity between
primary and multiple
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
FK demultiple
 Easy
 Cheap
 Requires regular offsets
 Poor on near offsets - amplitude effects
 Suffers from aliasing
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Radon Transform
• A way of transforming data from the x-t domain into the Tau-p domain.
• A multi-channel process which involves summing amplitudes along events in
the x-t domain to transform them into the Tau-p domain
• The trajectories along which the amplitudes are summed can be Linear,
Parabolic or Hyperbolic. Depending on the type of transformation, we give the
names:
• Linear Radon Transform
• Parabolic Radon Transform (PRT)
• Hyperbolic Radon Transform
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Tau-p Domain
 = t - px
+ p
P = -200 -100 0 100 200 300
T
X
-200
-100
0
+100
+200
+300
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Tau-p Domain
A
B
C
A’
B’
C’
 = t - px
+ p
Hyperbolae in T-X map to
ellipses in  - p
Linear events in T-X map to
single points in  - p
Plane wave
P=0
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
• So what is Tau and what is P
• Tau represents intercept time at zero offset
• P represents dip. The larger the dip of an event in the x-t domain the
higher its P value in the Tau-P domain. Flat events (our primaries) appear
around P=0 in the Tau-P domain.
P = t /  x.
Tau-p Domain
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Conversion examples - Diagram
(tau1, p2)
P
(tau2, p1)
(tau3, p3)
Traces (Offset)
tau2
tau3
Slant = p2
Slant = p3
Slant = p1
• The zero offset time of the slant path is Tau
• The slant (moveout, 1/velocity, slowness) is P
• A slant whose time increases with offset is +P
• A slant whose time decreases with offset is -P
+p 0 -p
Slant = p2
(tau3, p2)
tau2
tau1 tau1
tau3
p1 p2 p3
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Tau-p Domain
 Velocity filtering - events with different dips in T-X will have different ‘p’
values which can be muted/filtered.
 Demultiple –Parabolic Tau-p transform is more commonly used for
multiple attenuations.
 Deconvolution – more effective due to short-period reverberations being
more periodic (for any one p value)
Several processes are achievable in the tau-p domain, the
most common being:
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
PRT Demultiple
Multiple attenuations via PRT is generally accomplished in the
following way:
• Input CMP gathered data with NMO applied (primary events
corrected with multiples under-corrected)
• Transform the data into Tau-p domain
• Sum along parabolas as opposed to straight lines.
• Primary and multiple energy more focused than in F-K domain.
• Multiples muted prior to transform back to t-x domain or,
primaries are muted and the multiples transformed back to time
domain for subtraction from original data.
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
x
t
PRT Demultiple
x
t
NMO PRT

p
Mute
0
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
PRT Parameters
Let’s look a bit more closely at the parameters for prt:
• MOVEOUT RANGE: Minimum and Maximum times define a range
for conversion to tau-p domain specified at the reference
(maximum) offset.
• P TRACES: This range is split into evenly spaced parabolas
which is defined by the number of P-traces specified in the setup.
• MUTE: Area in the tau-p domain that is going to be muted ie area
with either primaries or multiples.
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Moveout Range “write-up”
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Number of P traces
The default number of p-traces is calculated as follows:
Np = 2 (Dtmax - Dt min) f max
where
– Dtmax = Maximum moveout (seconds)
– Dtmin = Minimum moveout (seconds)
– fmax = Maximum frequency (Hz)
– With reference offset set to max offset for gather
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Moveout Range and P Traces
Zero
offset
Reference
offset
• This example shows 7 p-
traces
• The 7 parabolas all start at
the same time for zero offset
• They finish at equi-distant
times which span the
Moveout Range
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Mute Range
Zero
offset
Reference
offset
• In this case we are muting
the primaries (red area)
and leaving the multiples
to be subtracted from the
original data
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Data Example
Multiples model is subtracted from the original gather
NMO corrected data Multiple Model Primaries
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Stacked Data Example
Before demultiple After demultiple
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
PRT Demultiple
 Easy
 Reasonably AVO friendly
 Expensive
 Can be difficult to parameterise
 Suffers from aliasing and inversion artefacts
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
x-t Predictive Deconvolution
• Apply predictive deconvolution in time to remove
periodic energy
Cheap
 Poor on far offsets where period is not constant
 Statistical
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
-p Predictive Deconvolution
• Apply predictive deconvolution in  on each p trace
to remove periodic energy
 Period is constant for horizontal layering
 Cost
 Period changes with p
 Statistical
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
• Involves the prediction of water-bottom multiples by wave-
field extrapolation - implemented in the FK domain
• Multiple model subtracted from the input data
• Does not predict other types of multiple e.g. inter-bed
• Requires specification of water depths and water velocity
Wave Equation Multiple Attenuation (WEMA)
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Propagate
& subtract
Wave Equation Multiple Attenuation (WEMA)
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Wave Equation Multiple Attenuation (WEMA)
 Only requires knowledge of water layer
 AVO preserving
 Requires simple water bottom
 Only removes water column multiples
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Multiple Attenuation
• Three basic classifications of attenuations methods
– Advantages / disadvantages
– Examples
• No single method provides “a silver bullet”
– We often apply several
– We must avoid attenuating signal
– We often have a problem with residual multiple.
• Development – a better future?
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
General Classification of Multiple Suppression Methods (1)
• Separability
– Velocity / moveout
discrimination
 Cheap & easy
 Requires
interpretation
 Incomplete
separation
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 1 - Separability
• Stack
– Limited application
• FK-demultiple
– Fallen out of favor – too many artifacts
• Radon-demultiple
– Current “workhorse”
– Dependent on spatial sampling, geometry, and
parameterization
– Higher resolution versions implemented
– Performs better on far offsets
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 1 – Separability – Example
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 1 – Separability – Example
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 1 – Separability – Example
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 1 – Separability – Example
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
General Classification of Multiple Suppression Methods (2)
• Periodicity
– Predictive
deconvolution
 Minimal interpretation
required
 Difficult to control
 May assume flat
geology
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 2 - Periodicity
• Post-stack – time domain
– Limited application
• Pre-stack time domain
– Only for very short period multiples
– Multiples are not periodic in x-t space
• Tau-p deconvolution
– Current “workhorse” (in shallow water)
– Dependent on spatial sampling, geometry, and
parameterization
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 2 – Periodicity – example
Stack with time domain deconvolution
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 2 – Periodicity – example
Stack with 1-pass tau-p deconvolution
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 2 – Periodicity – example
Stack with 2-pass tau-p deconvolution
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
General Classification of Multiple Suppression Methods (3)
• Modelling
– Prediction and subtraction
of multiples based on
primary information
 Minimal interpretation
required
 Usually 2D formulation
 Expensive
=
+
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 2 - Modeling
• “2D SMP” (Surface Multiple Prediction) is WesternGeco’s
implementation of a “SRME” (Surface Related Multiple
Elimination) approach.
– Dependent upon geometry
– Dependent upon cross-line dip (water bottom)
– Benefits from reduced feathering (presented at ASEG and
EAGE workshops)
– Usually performs better on near offsets
– 2D assumptions
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 3 – Modeling - STACK before 2D SMP
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 3 – Modeling - STACK after 2D SMP
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 3 – Modeling - CMPs before 2D SMP
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 3 – Modeling - CMPs after 2D SMP
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 3 – Modeling - Common Offset 2D SMP Model
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 3 – Modeling - Common Offset before 2D SMP
DP START Houston
2007
Schlumberger
Private
Method 3 – Modeling - Common Offset after 2D SMP

More Related Content

Similar to 3_TW6_Demultiple.ppt

Introduction to seismic interpretation
Introduction to seismic interpretationIntroduction to seismic interpretation
Introduction to seismic interpretationAmir I. Abdelaziz
 
2015-Mar-02: AGO Fluxgate Data: Extracting value from an imperfect time series
2015-Mar-02: AGO Fluxgate Data: Extracting value from an imperfect time series2015-Mar-02: AGO Fluxgate Data: Extracting value from an imperfect time series
2015-Mar-02: AGO Fluxgate Data: Extracting value from an imperfect time seriesinverseuniverse
 
Economic Load Dispatch.ppt
Economic Load Dispatch.pptEconomic Load Dispatch.ppt
Economic Load Dispatch.pptSuraj Dhungel
 
Iclp 2008 Aau
Iclp 2008 AauIclp 2008 Aau
Iclp 2008 Aauvidiratla
 
E. Sefusatti, Tests of the Initial Conditions of the Universe after Planck
E. Sefusatti, Tests of the Initial Conditions of the Universe after PlanckE. Sefusatti, Tests of the Initial Conditions of the Universe after Planck
E. Sefusatti, Tests of the Initial Conditions of the Universe after PlanckSEENET-MTP
 
UCSF Hyperpolarized MR #2: DNP Physics and Hardware (2019
UCSF Hyperpolarized MR #2: DNP Physics and Hardware (2019UCSF Hyperpolarized MR #2: DNP Physics and Hardware (2019
UCSF Hyperpolarized MR #2: DNP Physics and Hardware (2019Peder Larson
 
DSD-INT 2017 Delft3D FM - validation of hydrodynamics (1D,2D,3D) - van Dam
DSD-INT 2017 Delft3D FM - validation of hydrodynamics (1D,2D,3D) - van DamDSD-INT 2017 Delft3D FM - validation of hydrodynamics (1D,2D,3D) - van Dam
DSD-INT 2017 Delft3D FM - validation of hydrodynamics (1D,2D,3D) - van DamDeltares
 
Signature_deconvolution.pdf
Signature_deconvolution.pdfSignature_deconvolution.pdf
Signature_deconvolution.pdfJoydeepDeb3
 
Ec 2401 wireless communication unit 2
Ec 2401 wireless communication   unit 2Ec 2401 wireless communication   unit 2
Ec 2401 wireless communication unit 2JAIGANESH SEKAR
 
PLL_tutorial_slides.pdf
PLL_tutorial_slides.pdfPLL_tutorial_slides.pdf
PLL_tutorial_slides.pdfssuser716da4
 
AICHE 15 VORTEX + MASS TRANSFER
AICHE 15   VORTEX + MASS TRANSFERAICHE 15   VORTEX + MASS TRANSFER
AICHE 15 VORTEX + MASS TRANSFERRichard Grenville
 
Surface Plasmon Resonance
Surface Plasmon ResonanceSurface Plasmon Resonance
Surface Plasmon ResonanceDebasmit Das
 
7-gassteam-medium.pptx
7-gassteam-medium.pptx7-gassteam-medium.pptx
7-gassteam-medium.pptxsenyab06
 
InstrumentTransformer.pdf
InstrumentTransformer.pdfInstrumentTransformer.pdf
InstrumentTransformer.pdfTamil365356
 
Intro to Radio Systems. imagens e modelos
Intro to Radio Systems. imagens e modelosIntro to Radio Systems. imagens e modelos
Intro to Radio Systems. imagens e modelosjonatanmedeirosgomes1
 
dennis fisher pll
dennis fisher pll dennis fisher pll
dennis fisher pll HowHwanWong
 
Impact of Electrification on Asset Life Degradation and Mitigation with DER
Impact of Electrification on Asset Life Degradation and Mitigation with DERImpact of Electrification on Asset Life Degradation and Mitigation with DER
Impact of Electrification on Asset Life Degradation and Mitigation with DERPower System Operation
 

Similar to 3_TW6_Demultiple.ppt (20)

Introduction to seismic interpretation
Introduction to seismic interpretationIntroduction to seismic interpretation
Introduction to seismic interpretation
 
2015-Mar-02: AGO Fluxgate Data: Extracting value from an imperfect time series
2015-Mar-02: AGO Fluxgate Data: Extracting value from an imperfect time series2015-Mar-02: AGO Fluxgate Data: Extracting value from an imperfect time series
2015-Mar-02: AGO Fluxgate Data: Extracting value from an imperfect time series
 
Economic Load Dispatch.ppt
Economic Load Dispatch.pptEconomic Load Dispatch.ppt
Economic Load Dispatch.ppt
 
Iclp 2008 Aau
Iclp 2008 AauIclp 2008 Aau
Iclp 2008 Aau
 
ECE 467 Mini project 2
ECE 467 Mini project 2ECE 467 Mini project 2
ECE 467 Mini project 2
 
Turbulence 2020 gt
Turbulence 2020 gtTurbulence 2020 gt
Turbulence 2020 gt
 
E. Sefusatti, Tests of the Initial Conditions of the Universe after Planck
E. Sefusatti, Tests of the Initial Conditions of the Universe after PlanckE. Sefusatti, Tests of the Initial Conditions of the Universe after Planck
E. Sefusatti, Tests of the Initial Conditions of the Universe after Planck
 
UCSF Hyperpolarized MR #2: DNP Physics and Hardware (2019
UCSF Hyperpolarized MR #2: DNP Physics and Hardware (2019UCSF Hyperpolarized MR #2: DNP Physics and Hardware (2019
UCSF Hyperpolarized MR #2: DNP Physics and Hardware (2019
 
ECE 467 Mini project 1
ECE 467 Mini project 1ECE 467 Mini project 1
ECE 467 Mini project 1
 
DSD-INT 2017 Delft3D FM - validation of hydrodynamics (1D,2D,3D) - van Dam
DSD-INT 2017 Delft3D FM - validation of hydrodynamics (1D,2D,3D) - van DamDSD-INT 2017 Delft3D FM - validation of hydrodynamics (1D,2D,3D) - van Dam
DSD-INT 2017 Delft3D FM - validation of hydrodynamics (1D,2D,3D) - van Dam
 
Signature_deconvolution.pdf
Signature_deconvolution.pdfSignature_deconvolution.pdf
Signature_deconvolution.pdf
 
Ec 2401 wireless communication unit 2
Ec 2401 wireless communication   unit 2Ec 2401 wireless communication   unit 2
Ec 2401 wireless communication unit 2
 
PLL_tutorial_slides.pdf
PLL_tutorial_slides.pdfPLL_tutorial_slides.pdf
PLL_tutorial_slides.pdf
 
AICHE 15 VORTEX + MASS TRANSFER
AICHE 15   VORTEX + MASS TRANSFERAICHE 15   VORTEX + MASS TRANSFER
AICHE 15 VORTEX + MASS TRANSFER
 
Surface Plasmon Resonance
Surface Plasmon ResonanceSurface Plasmon Resonance
Surface Plasmon Resonance
 
7-gassteam-medium.pptx
7-gassteam-medium.pptx7-gassteam-medium.pptx
7-gassteam-medium.pptx
 
InstrumentTransformer.pdf
InstrumentTransformer.pdfInstrumentTransformer.pdf
InstrumentTransformer.pdf
 
Intro to Radio Systems. imagens e modelos
Intro to Radio Systems. imagens e modelosIntro to Radio Systems. imagens e modelos
Intro to Radio Systems. imagens e modelos
 
dennis fisher pll
dennis fisher pll dennis fisher pll
dennis fisher pll
 
Impact of Electrification on Asset Life Degradation and Mitigation with DER
Impact of Electrification on Asset Life Degradation and Mitigation with DERImpact of Electrification on Asset Life Degradation and Mitigation with DER
Impact of Electrification on Asset Life Degradation and Mitigation with DER
 

Recently uploaded

Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatidSpermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatidSarthak Sekhar Mondal
 
Traditional Agroforestry System in India- Shifting Cultivation, Taungya, Home...
Traditional Agroforestry System in India- Shifting Cultivation, Taungya, Home...Traditional Agroforestry System in India- Shifting Cultivation, Taungya, Home...
Traditional Agroforestry System in India- Shifting Cultivation, Taungya, Home...jana861314
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡anilsa9823
 
Call Us ≽ 9953322196 ≼ Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar(Delhi) |
Call Us ≽ 9953322196 ≼ Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar(Delhi) |Call Us ≽ 9953322196 ≼ Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar(Delhi) |
Call Us ≽ 9953322196 ≼ Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar(Delhi) |aasikanpl
 
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?Patrick Diehl
 
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptxGFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptxAleenaTreesaSaji
 
Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43b
Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43bNightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43b
Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43bSérgio Sacani
 
STERILITY TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICALS ppt by DR.C.P.PRINCE
STERILITY TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICALS ppt by DR.C.P.PRINCESTERILITY TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICALS ppt by DR.C.P.PRINCE
STERILITY TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICALS ppt by DR.C.P.PRINCEPRINCE C P
 
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroidsHubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroidsSérgio Sacani
 
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdfChemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdfSumit Kumar yadav
 
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdfBotany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdfSumit Kumar yadav
 
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTDisentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTSérgio Sacani
 
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral AnalysisRaman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral AnalysisDiwakar Mishra
 
Natural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based NanomaterialsNatural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based NanomaterialsAArockiyaNisha
 
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​kaibalyasahoo82800
 
Orientation, design and principles of polyhouse
Orientation, design and principles of polyhouseOrientation, design and principles of polyhouse
Orientation, design and principles of polyhousejana861314
 
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...RohitNehra6
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatidSpermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
 
Engler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomy
Engler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomyEngler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomy
Engler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomy
 
Traditional Agroforestry System in India- Shifting Cultivation, Taungya, Home...
Traditional Agroforestry System in India- Shifting Cultivation, Taungya, Home...Traditional Agroforestry System in India- Shifting Cultivation, Taungya, Home...
Traditional Agroforestry System in India- Shifting Cultivation, Taungya, Home...
 
9953056974 Young Call Girls In Mahavir enclave Indian Quality Escort service
9953056974 Young Call Girls In Mahavir enclave Indian Quality Escort service9953056974 Young Call Girls In Mahavir enclave Indian Quality Escort service
9953056974 Young Call Girls In Mahavir enclave Indian Quality Escort service
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service  🪡
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Kesar Bagh Lucknow best Night Fun service 🪡
 
Call Us ≽ 9953322196 ≼ Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar(Delhi) |
Call Us ≽ 9953322196 ≼ Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar(Delhi) |Call Us ≽ 9953322196 ≼ Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar(Delhi) |
Call Us ≽ 9953322196 ≼ Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar(Delhi) |
 
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
 
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptxGFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
GFP in rDNA Technology (Biotechnology).pptx
 
Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43b
Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43bNightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43b
Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43b
 
STERILITY TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICALS ppt by DR.C.P.PRINCE
STERILITY TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICALS ppt by DR.C.P.PRINCESTERILITY TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICALS ppt by DR.C.P.PRINCE
STERILITY TESTING OF PHARMACEUTICALS ppt by DR.C.P.PRINCE
 
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroidsHubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
Hubble Asteroid Hunter III. Physical properties of newly found asteroids
 
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdfChemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
 
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdfBotany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Botany 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
 
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTDisentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
 
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral AnalysisRaman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
 
Natural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based NanomaterialsNatural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
Natural Polymer Based Nanomaterials
 
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​  ​
Nanoparticles synthesis and characterization​ ​
 
Orientation, design and principles of polyhouse
Orientation, design and principles of polyhouseOrientation, design and principles of polyhouse
Orientation, design and principles of polyhouse
 
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of cotton_Sucking_Pests_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
 

3_TW6_Demultiple.ppt

  • 2. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private At the end of this Session, you will be able to: • Define the terms primary energy and multiple energy as used in data processing. • Define the terms multiple order and period as used in processing. • Define the following water bottom multiple, free surface multiple, peg-leg multiple and internal multiple • Produce a diagram that shows the travel path of each of the following multiple types: water bottom multiple, free surface multiple, peg-leg multiple, internal multiple
  • 3. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Multiples are events reflected more than once Multiples hinder interpretation False events Incorrect amplitudes Multiples can be very difficult…… to identify to remove Primary and Multiple energy Primary energy is energy which has been reflected only once, and so is a true image of the reflector from which it arose
  • 4. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private General Properties of Multiples • Low velocity (high moveout) – Velocity increases with depth • High amplitude – less geometric spreading • Periodic – Repeated cycles in horizontal layers • Predictable – From primaries
  • 5. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Multiple Order • This is the number of additional bounces that a seismic wave has undergone in addition to the original primary reflection. • Therefore, a second-order multiple is a signal that has undergone a primary reflection plus two additional bounces off the same layer. P 1st 2nd
  • 6. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Multiple Period • This is the time between each successive bounce of the multiple series. • Multiple periods are generally classified into three types: 1. Short 2. Intermediate 3. Long
  • 7. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Multiple Period • Short period multiples generally have a period of 100 or 200 msec. • Long period multiples generally have a period of 1/2 second or longer. • Intermediate period multiples fall directly between these two types.
  • 8. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Order of Multiples Primary 1st order multiple 2nd order multiple multiple period A B C Event recorded, dependent on receiver position: B - First order multiple C - Second order multiple A - Primary
  • 9. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Water Bottom Multiple Water-bottom multiple • Extremely common source of multiple reflection. • This is because both the water/air interface and the water bottom are characterized by having a large change in acoustic impedance. • High proportion of the seismic energy is trapped in the water layer, and little signal is transmitted into the earth.
  • 10. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Water Bottom Multiple The reflection coefficient of the water/air interface approximates to -1, so as can be seen, the polarity of the signal changes after each reflection from this interface (ie. there is a 180° phase change at each reflection).
  • 11. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Pegleg Multiple Water-bottom Pegleg multiple Pegleg Multiple • The water layer acts as a source of multiple reflections for primary reflections which arise within the earth itself. • The generated multiples are referred to as peg-leg multiples, because of their characteristic ray paths. • Their paths are asymmetric.
  • 12. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Free Surface Multiple Free-surface multiple • An impedance contrast occurs at the land/air boundary in land acquisition just as at the water/air boundary in marine acquisition. • The reflection coefficient of the air/land surface interface approximates to -1, so the polarity of the signal changes after each reflection from this interface (ie. there is a 180° phase change at each reflection).
  • 13. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Internal Multiple Inter-bed or internal multiple • The only prerequisite for multiples to occur is that there should be at least two strong reflectors. • Multiples may arise within the earth at any interface, provided that the two reflectors have "large" reflection coefficients
  • 14. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Removal of multiples The removal of multiples generally relies on either or both of two recognisable characteristics. • Multiples will generally go on and on, repeating with the same time interval and gradually decreasing in amplitude. • Multiples will generally appear on our CDP gathers with a velocity slower than the primary velocity at the same time.
  • 15. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Primary and Multiple Velocity • As the primary and multiple energy has both travelled through the same layer the multiple just spent longer in the layer, then what’s their velocity relationship? P 1st 2nd They have the same velocity
  • 16. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Velocity 1st order multiple multiple period We can recognise a multiple as having the same velocity as the primary. On semblance displays multiples will appear directly below primaries. Velocity should increase the further into the earth you go so multiples will have a slower velocity than the events surrounding them. They will appear to be under corrected on your cmp gathers. Constant Velocity Stack (CVS) 2nd order multiple primary
  • 17. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private CMP gather and stack after NMO correction using primary velocity function CMP stack of nmo corrected gathers will result in enhancement of the primary energy and degradation of the multiple energy. Stack
  • 18. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Stack  Easy  Cheap  Improves S/N  Incomplete multiple suppression  Output is poststack - limited AVO available
  • 19. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private CMP gather and stack after NMO correction using primary velocity function Removing the near traces from our cmp gather results in further degradation of the multiples. As the multiple event appears flattest on the near traces and so stacks up best for the near traces. Near Trace Mute
  • 20. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private CMP gathers after NMO correction using multiple velocity function primary multiple 1. The normal procedure is to overcorrect the primaries while leaving the multiples undercorrected. 2. Transform to FK domain. 3. Remove all events at K > 0 i.e. all multiple energy muted. primary multiple FK demultiple
  • 21. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private FK demultiple x t CMP gather f k FT Mute K + - x t NMO NMO correction Multiple Primary Using velocity between primary and multiple
  • 22. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private FK demultiple  Easy  Cheap  Requires regular offsets  Poor on near offsets - amplitude effects  Suffers from aliasing
  • 23. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Radon Transform • A way of transforming data from the x-t domain into the Tau-p domain. • A multi-channel process which involves summing amplitudes along events in the x-t domain to transform them into the Tau-p domain • The trajectories along which the amplitudes are summed can be Linear, Parabolic or Hyperbolic. Depending on the type of transformation, we give the names: • Linear Radon Transform • Parabolic Radon Transform (PRT) • Hyperbolic Radon Transform
  • 24. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Tau-p Domain  = t - px + p P = -200 -100 0 100 200 300 T X -200 -100 0 +100 +200 +300
  • 25. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Tau-p Domain A B C A’ B’ C’  = t - px + p Hyperbolae in T-X map to ellipses in  - p Linear events in T-X map to single points in  - p Plane wave P=0
  • 26. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private • So what is Tau and what is P • Tau represents intercept time at zero offset • P represents dip. The larger the dip of an event in the x-t domain the higher its P value in the Tau-P domain. Flat events (our primaries) appear around P=0 in the Tau-P domain. P = t /  x. Tau-p Domain
  • 27. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Conversion examples - Diagram (tau1, p2) P (tau2, p1) (tau3, p3) Traces (Offset) tau2 tau3 Slant = p2 Slant = p3 Slant = p1 • The zero offset time of the slant path is Tau • The slant (moveout, 1/velocity, slowness) is P • A slant whose time increases with offset is +P • A slant whose time decreases with offset is -P +p 0 -p Slant = p2 (tau3, p2) tau2 tau1 tau1 tau3 p1 p2 p3
  • 28. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Tau-p Domain  Velocity filtering - events with different dips in T-X will have different ‘p’ values which can be muted/filtered.  Demultiple –Parabolic Tau-p transform is more commonly used for multiple attenuations.  Deconvolution – more effective due to short-period reverberations being more periodic (for any one p value) Several processes are achievable in the tau-p domain, the most common being:
  • 29. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private PRT Demultiple Multiple attenuations via PRT is generally accomplished in the following way: • Input CMP gathered data with NMO applied (primary events corrected with multiples under-corrected) • Transform the data into Tau-p domain • Sum along parabolas as opposed to straight lines. • Primary and multiple energy more focused than in F-K domain. • Multiples muted prior to transform back to t-x domain or, primaries are muted and the multiples transformed back to time domain for subtraction from original data.
  • 30. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private x t PRT Demultiple x t NMO PRT  p Mute 0
  • 31. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private PRT Parameters Let’s look a bit more closely at the parameters for prt: • MOVEOUT RANGE: Minimum and Maximum times define a range for conversion to tau-p domain specified at the reference (maximum) offset. • P TRACES: This range is split into evenly spaced parabolas which is defined by the number of P-traces specified in the setup. • MUTE: Area in the tau-p domain that is going to be muted ie area with either primaries or multiples.
  • 33. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Number of P traces The default number of p-traces is calculated as follows: Np = 2 (Dtmax - Dt min) f max where – Dtmax = Maximum moveout (seconds) – Dtmin = Minimum moveout (seconds) – fmax = Maximum frequency (Hz) – With reference offset set to max offset for gather
  • 34. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Moveout Range and P Traces Zero offset Reference offset • This example shows 7 p- traces • The 7 parabolas all start at the same time for zero offset • They finish at equi-distant times which span the Moveout Range
  • 35. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Mute Range Zero offset Reference offset • In this case we are muting the primaries (red area) and leaving the multiples to be subtracted from the original data
  • 36. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Data Example Multiples model is subtracted from the original gather NMO corrected data Multiple Model Primaries
  • 37. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Stacked Data Example Before demultiple After demultiple
  • 38. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private PRT Demultiple  Easy  Reasonably AVO friendly  Expensive  Can be difficult to parameterise  Suffers from aliasing and inversion artefacts
  • 39. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private x-t Predictive Deconvolution • Apply predictive deconvolution in time to remove periodic energy Cheap  Poor on far offsets where period is not constant  Statistical
  • 40. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private -p Predictive Deconvolution • Apply predictive deconvolution in  on each p trace to remove periodic energy  Period is constant for horizontal layering  Cost  Period changes with p  Statistical
  • 41. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private • Involves the prediction of water-bottom multiples by wave- field extrapolation - implemented in the FK domain • Multiple model subtracted from the input data • Does not predict other types of multiple e.g. inter-bed • Requires specification of water depths and water velocity Wave Equation Multiple Attenuation (WEMA)
  • 42. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Propagate & subtract Wave Equation Multiple Attenuation (WEMA)
  • 43. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Wave Equation Multiple Attenuation (WEMA)  Only requires knowledge of water layer  AVO preserving  Requires simple water bottom  Only removes water column multiples
  • 44. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Multiple Attenuation • Three basic classifications of attenuations methods – Advantages / disadvantages – Examples • No single method provides “a silver bullet” – We often apply several – We must avoid attenuating signal – We often have a problem with residual multiple. • Development – a better future?
  • 45. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private General Classification of Multiple Suppression Methods (1) • Separability – Velocity / moveout discrimination  Cheap & easy  Requires interpretation  Incomplete separation
  • 46. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 1 - Separability • Stack – Limited application • FK-demultiple – Fallen out of favor – too many artifacts • Radon-demultiple – Current “workhorse” – Dependent on spatial sampling, geometry, and parameterization – Higher resolution versions implemented – Performs better on far offsets
  • 47. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 1 – Separability – Example
  • 48. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 1 – Separability – Example
  • 49. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 1 – Separability – Example
  • 50. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 1 – Separability – Example
  • 51. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private General Classification of Multiple Suppression Methods (2) • Periodicity – Predictive deconvolution  Minimal interpretation required  Difficult to control  May assume flat geology
  • 52. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 2 - Periodicity • Post-stack – time domain – Limited application • Pre-stack time domain – Only for very short period multiples – Multiples are not periodic in x-t space • Tau-p deconvolution – Current “workhorse” (in shallow water) – Dependent on spatial sampling, geometry, and parameterization
  • 53. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 2 – Periodicity – example Stack with time domain deconvolution
  • 54. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 2 – Periodicity – example Stack with 1-pass tau-p deconvolution
  • 55. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 2 – Periodicity – example Stack with 2-pass tau-p deconvolution
  • 56. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private General Classification of Multiple Suppression Methods (3) • Modelling – Prediction and subtraction of multiples based on primary information  Minimal interpretation required  Usually 2D formulation  Expensive = +
  • 57. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 2 - Modeling • “2D SMP” (Surface Multiple Prediction) is WesternGeco’s implementation of a “SRME” (Surface Related Multiple Elimination) approach. – Dependent upon geometry – Dependent upon cross-line dip (water bottom) – Benefits from reduced feathering (presented at ASEG and EAGE workshops) – Usually performs better on near offsets – 2D assumptions
  • 58. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 3 – Modeling - STACK before 2D SMP
  • 59. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 3 – Modeling - STACK after 2D SMP
  • 60. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 3 – Modeling - CMPs before 2D SMP
  • 61. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 3 – Modeling - CMPs after 2D SMP
  • 62. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 3 – Modeling - Common Offset 2D SMP Model
  • 63. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 3 – Modeling - Common Offset before 2D SMP
  • 64. DP START Houston 2007 Schlumberger Private Method 3 – Modeling - Common Offset after 2D SMP