Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Building Digital Citizenship

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 17 Ad

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to Building Digital Citizenship (20)

Advertisement

More from University of Sydney (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Building Digital Citizenship

  1. 1. Talk for Live, Work, Play: NSW The State of Inclusion conference 17-18 May 2017 Gerard Goggin (@ggoggin) University of Sydney Unpacking Accessible Technology: Building Digital Citizenship
  2. 2. What is digital citizenship? •not just cybersafety & digital literacy (very important; taught in schools now) •contemporary citizenship – civil, political, social & cultural – involves digital technology •across attitudes, liveable communities, employment & better access to services •So we have rights to digital technology (starting with Internet & mobile tech rights)
  3. 3. State of Inclusion May 2017 Conference theme: ‘Assistive technology and accessible IT to enhance inclusion for all, particularly people with disability’ Very timely because accessible technology underpins all 4 focus areas of NSW Inclusion plan however, accessible technology is not mentioned in the 2015-2019 plan; so NSW presumably is in ‘catch-up’ mode in terms of strategy (it’s not alone) Key issue is a paradox: • much of accessible IT is shaped globally or nationally; and thro’ difficult to follow technical arenas/knowledge; • Reliance upon the market to deliver accessible IT – but also now assistive technology (e.g. NDIS reliance on growing the market); this is not going to deliver digital citizenship • yet state & local governments play a critical, facilitative & leadership role in how accessible IT & assistive technology innovation, systems & access actually play out So how do we ‘build’ (disability) digital citizenship, from such a state-based perspective?
  4. 4. ‘low level of digital inclusion’ ‘For people with disability, digital inclusion is low, but improving steadily. People with disability have a low level of digital inclusion (44.4, or 10.1 points below the national average). However, nationally, their inclusion has improved steadily (by 2.6 points since 2014), outpacing the national average increase (1.8 points).’ Thomas, J, Barraket, J, Ewing, S, MacDonald, T, Mundell, M & Tucker, J 2016, Measuring Australia’s Digital Divide: The Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2016, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, for Telstra. Definition of ‘disability’: ‘Disability: people in this category receive either a disability pension, or the disability support pension’ (p. 7)
  5. 5. Disability helps us reimagine digital citizenship • 1st of all: technologies have to be accessible, useable & affordable for all • esp. digital technologies – if designed & implemented – offer new forms of accessibility (e.g. web accessibility; screen readers; voice & communication technologies; different kind of interfaces via touch; automation; robotics)
  6. 6. Key ideas for disability, inclusion & digital technology Socially shaped, disability spans a wide variety of different bodies, conditions, and situations we can find themselves more or less “disabled,” identifying or dis-identifying with disability, through the course of our lives In relation to technology, there are many ways in which barriers, obstacles, and inaccessibility can be “built-in” to systems, rather than producing “enabling” environments Disability has an especially close association with design, offering many ways to rethink “universal” and “inclusive design”;
  7. 7. Key ideas for disability, inclusion & digital technology Disability draws our attention to new aspects of literacy, education, and user support requiring accessible formats, inclusive education, as well as drawing attention to cultural and linguistic aspects of digital inequality (the importance of sign language for Deaf communities, for instance) Many of the proffered solutions for global connectivity, such as cheap mobile phones, fall well short of meeting the needs, preferences, and desires of users with disabilities People with disabilities are marginalized in the research, policy, technology design, and policy formulation relating to digital citizenship & inequality
  8. 8. Disability digital citizenship: New markets, new rights • Technology now crosses divide between ‘assistive’ and ‘mainstream/other’ technologies in new ways (e.g. tablet computers such the iPad) – this changes market, economic & consumer dynamics • right to technologies as integral part of human rights are set out in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) • People with disabilities face significant social inequality & justice - technology is seen as key tool in addressing • so we can find an implied vision of digital citizenship in the CRPD
  9. 9. Do we have a map of digital citizenship in NSW? • How does each person and household gain affordable, accessible access to & use of accessible technology? (e.g. what role is played by NSW tech industry & ecosystem; employers; NDIS system & providers in assistive tech; Fed govt in universal service; anti-discrimination/human rights law; state gov & agencies; local govt; community groups; education institutions?) • How does everyone learn the basics about digital technology? across different groups/demographics in communities, especially addressing distinct requirements across families; communities; schools; work; institutional settings; • How do we ensure everyone has access to training & support for new kinds of digital technology? E.g. to access ‘digital’ government services (paying bills; licence renewals) Often community groups, libraries, local governments provide/support such training/support
  10. 10. Map of digital citizenship in NSW? • What say do citizens have in introduction & operation of digital technologies? (e.g. what are the governance arrangements for data gathering & digital services in ‘smart’ cities currently being developed?) • Policies for intersectional digital citizenship (e.g. what the concepts & needs of disability digital citizenship that come from innovative use in particular communities – cultural diverse, indigenous, rural & remote communities, gender & sexually diverse communities?) • Digital citizenship across the ‘life course’ (e.g. what about mandating Wi-Fi access in nursing homes & care facilities for older people?)
  11. 11. Stacey Zoern’s Kenguru, from Paul Richoux, ‘Kenguru: the perfect car for wheelchair users?’, ‘Wheelchairs and Mobility’, 24 September, 2014
  12. 12. references Goggin, Gerard, Scott Hollier, and Wayne Hawkins. “Internet Accessibility and Disability Policy: Lessons for Digital Inclusion from Australia.” Internet Policy Review 6.1 (2017) Goggin, Gerard. “Communication Rights, Disability, and Law: The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in National Perspective.” Law in Context (2017), in press Goggin, Gerard. “Reimagining Digital Citizenship via Disability.” In Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest, Culture, edited by Anthony McCosker, Sonja Vivienne, and Amelia Johns, 61-80 (Rowman & Littefield, 2016 ) Goggin, Gerard. “Disability and Digital Inequalities: Rethinking Digital Divides with Disability Theory.” In Theorizing Digital Divides, edited by Massimo Ragnedda and Glenn Muschert (Routledge, 2017)

×