Stakeholders Meeting | May 16, 2019
Meeting Agenda
• Welcome
• Announcements
• Peer Recovery Supports
• Discussion
• Community Response Team
• 2018 Jail Population Data
• Wrap-Up
2
With Gratitude and Admiration…
Gary Ambrose, Brigadier General, USAF (retired)
2018 Annual Report
• Overview of Diversion First
• Highlights from 2018
• Specialty dockets
• Community Response Team
• Strive to Achieve Recovery (STAR)
program
• 2018 Data Snapshot
• Plans for 2019
4
Contributing to the Field…
• Published in early 2019
• A SAMHSA practice guide outlining principles for
a quality, community-based behavioral health
treatment system
• Acknowledged as Expert Panelists!
• Captain Tony Shobe, Sheriff’s Office
• 2nd Lieutenant Redic Morris, Sheriff’s Office
• Marissa Fariña-Morse, Service Director, CSB
5
Stepping Up for
Mental Health
• Stakeholders Meeting!
• Annual Report
• Mental Health Docket-
News4 interview
• Veterans Docket Graduation
• SAMHSA Webinar on Early
Diversion programs
• Community presentations
FY 2020 Budget
May 7, 2019- Board of Supervisors
approved the FY 2020 budget, which
included funding for the fourth year of
Diversion First:
• 12 positions
• 6 Health and Human Services
• 6 Public Safety
• Additional funds for housing assistance and
programming
7
FY 2020 Funding
Highlights
• Mental Health Docket Coordinator
• Behavioral Health positions for Jail Diversion
Team
• Police and Sheriff’s Sergeants for MCRC
• Fire and Rescue Technician and Crisis
Intervention Specialists for Community
Response Team
• Probation Officer for JDRDC
• Commonwealth Attorney
8
8
Mental Health Docket News
Mental Health Docket Approved by the Virginia
Supreme Court!
Anticipated start- July, 2019
9
Well Done!
10
Peer Recovery Supports
Michael Lane | Individual and Family Affairs Director
Pictures courtesy of unsplash.com, used with permission
Why Peer Support?
Experience of Disconnection:
• Trauma
• Unsustainable way of life
• Criminality
• A reality not shared by others
• Devastated Relationships
• Irreversible Consequences
12
Peer Support
Connects/ Reconnects
• Hope
• Options
• Treatment
• Other Supports
• Honesty
• Healthy relationships
13
Shared Experience
& New Experiences
A Peer Supporter is a model of:
• Overcoming obstacles
• Creating and sustaining healthy
relationships
• Successful employment
• Effectively dealing with trauma
• Having fun in Recovery
• Becoming one’s best self
• A fulfilling life
14
“Natural” vs. “Professional”
Peer Support
• “Natural” Peer Support
• Examples:
• Breast Cancer Survivors
• 12-Step Groups and Sponsors
• No one is paid for their role
• Boundaries determined only by the
individuals involved.
• “Professional” Peer Support
• One individual is paid for their role.
• Boundaries are determined by the
employer, and the individuals
involved
In Fairfax
County
STAR Program
Specialty Dockets
Emergency Services
Residential Substance Use
Treatment Programs
Jail Diversion
Opioid Task Force
Wellness & Recovery Centers
… and many more
CSB Emergency
Services
• Connect to: transportation, food
banks, clothing closets, shelters,
services at Merrifield and other
CSB sites
• De-escalate and provide support
to address emergent crisis
• Drop In group for parents and
teenagers (HEADS UP, TALK IT
OUT!)
• Support groups and workshops
• Monitor various spaces
… and more!
Programs
across US
• Inpatient Treatment
• Mobile Crisis Teams
• Peer-Run Respites
• Emergency Departments
• Primary Care
• Outpatient programs
• Re-Entry programs
• Inreach to incarcerated
…and many more
Training and
Skills
• 72 hour training
• 500 hours of supervised
experience
• 1 year of demonstrated
recovery
• Ability to share personal
experiences in an intentional,
positive manner
• Capacity to listen to others
share traumatic experiences
• Ability to work effectively in
multi-disciplinary teams
Peer Support
Values
• Hope
• Many Paths
• Relationship-Focused
• Trauma-Informed
• Shared Experience
• Professionalism
20
Evidence Base
• A study of 76 individuals who had been admitted to
Yale-New Haven Psychiatric Hospital (all who had at
least two psychiatric hospitalizations in the previous
18 months) compared the outcomes of those who had
been assigned a peer mentor with the outcomes of
those who received standard post-discharge services.
The individuals in the peer mentor group had double
the average time to psychiatric rehospitalization than
those receiving standard care – 270 days compared to
135 days. (O’Connell, et al.; 2018)
• Pierce County Washington reduced involuntary
hospitalization by 32% by using certified peer
specialists offering respite services, leading to a
savings of 1.99 million dollars in one year (Bergeson;
2011)
More Evidence
• A Federally Qualified Health Center in
Denver (FQHC) that used peer support
had an ROI of $2.28 for every $1 spent.
• 90% of individuals who used a peer crisis
respite in Orange County, NY did not
return to the hospital in the subsequent
two years.
• A Connecticut program demonstrated a
significant reduction in criminal charges
and alcohol use in the 12 months
subsequent to the peer interventions.
Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Important
Considerations
• Voluntary
• Well-trained supervisors
• Integration in teams OR
Stand-alone
• Connection with other
Peer Supporters
• Avoid
• Clinical Drift
• Informant Drift
Where along the Sequential Intercept
Model would peer supports be most
effective?
Email: DiversionFirst@fairfaxcounty.gov
Co-Responder Model
(Community Response Team)
Abbey May| Emergency and Acute Services Director
Kristina Deemark| Public Safety Communication Operations
Laura Maddock| Emergency Services Supervisor
Co-Responder
Model
Community
Response Team
(CRT)-
Public Safety and
CSB responding
together on super
utilizers of public
safety
Diversion
Proactive
outreach,
intervention,
Diversion from
arrest
Reduction
Reduction in calls
for service for
public safety
Improvements
Increased public
safety and
community health,
more efficient and
appropriate use of
resources
27
Community Response Team
CRT Pilot Operational Updates
• MOU
• Public Safety Electronic Referral Application Prototype (GIS capability)
• CRT Brochure, Intro letter
• FRD Internal email referral process
CRTPartnerships
• Inova ER Social workers (CareView access)
• Office to Prevent and End Homelessness
• PATH
• Shelters
• Adult Protective Services and Adult Services
• Code Compliance
• Peer Recovery Specialists
CRTReferrals
• MCRC
• Crisis Link
• Adult Protective Services
• Older Adult Programs
• Physician/Durable Medical Goods
• CSB Services
• Inpatient Psychiatric Care
• Coordinated Services Planning
Community Response Team
CRT Next Steps
• Law Enforcement roll call training
• Fire and Rescue Department (FRD) station
outreach
• Referral reference built into Computer-Aided
Dispatch (CAD) system
• FRD Emergency Medical Service (EMS) web
based training tool
29
Community Response Team
Current Super-Utilizer Count
30
Community Response Team
Community Response Team
2018 Jail Behavioral Health
Population Analysis
Chloe Lee| Data and Evaluation Manager
Behavioral Health
Population Booked
into Jail: 2015-2018
• There was an 8% decrease
in the number of inmates
in the behavioral health
population booked into jail
from 2015 to 2018.
However, the percentage
remained the same (35%).
4,492
4,276
3,983
4,127
35.2%
34.5%
32.1%
35.0%
20%
22%
24%
26%
28%
30%
32%
34%
36%
38%
3,000
3,200
3,400
3,600
3,800
4,000
4,200
4,400
4,600
4,800
5,000
2015 2016 2017 2018
Number of inmates in behavioral health population
% of inmates in behavioral health population
34
Behavioral Health
Population with
Misdemeanor Charges:
2015-2018
• The Diversion First
population is individuals
with behavioral health
issues who are frequently
in and out of jail with low
level charges.
• Data shows that the
number and the
percentage of the target
population has decreased
over time.
1,854
1,614
1,492 1,507
41.3%
37.8%
37.4%
36.5%
34%
35%
36%
37%
38%
39%
40%
41%
42%
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2015 2016 2017 2018
Number of behavioral health population with misdmeanor charges and no
felony in 2018
% of behavioral health population with misdemeanor charges and no felony
35
Inmates who were
Referred to CSB Jail-
based Services: 2015-
2018
• There was a 43% increase
in the number of inmates
who were referred to CSB
jail-based services from
2015 to 2018.
2,286
2,632
3,028
3,275
17.8%
21.2%
24.4%
27.8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
2015 2016 2017 2018
Number of inmates referred to CSB jail-based services
% of inmates referred to CSB jail-based servies (all jail population)
36
2018 Jail Behavioral Health Population: Demographic Characteristics
(N=4,127)
55.2%
41.0%
3.6% 0.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
White Black Asian Other
Race
4.1%
10.6%
14.8%
30.1%
20.7%
19.7%
60 or higher
50-59
40-49
30-39
25-29
18-24
Age categories
BH No BH
Homelessness
Gender
6.2%
4%
2018 Jail Behavioral
Health Population:
Mental Health
Diagnosis (N=4,127)
• Over 41% of the behavioral
health population (15% of the
jail population) had at least
one mental health diagnosis.
• The most common mental
health diagnosis among the
behavioral health population
was depression.
• Female inmates in the
behavioral health population
were more likely to have a
mental health diagnosis than
male inmates.
01
• DEPRESSION 12.1%
02
• PTSD 7.2%
03
• BIPOLAR DISORDER 6.6%
Most Common MH Diagnosis
59%
of the female inmates in
the behavioral health
population had mental
health diagnosis (21% of
all female inmates
booked into jail in 2018).
of the male inmates in the
behavioral health population
had mental health diagnosis
(13% of all male inmates
booked into jail in 2018).38%
38
2018 Jail Behavioral
Health Population:
Substance Use Disorder
(SUD) Diagnosis (N=4,127)
• 58% of the behavioral health
population (20% of the jail
population) had at least one SUD
diagnosis, including alcohol.
• Male inmates in the behavioral
health population were more
likely to have an SUD diagnosis
than female except for opioid-
related diagnosis.
• 62% of the white inmates in the
behavioral health population had
an SUD diagnosis.
30%
19%
38%36%
13%
43%
Alcohol Opioid Other SUD
SUD by Gender
% of male/female behavioral health population
Female Male
62%
54%
45%
White Black Asian
SUD by Race
% of white/black/Asian behavioral health population
Days in Jail
• There was a 17% decrease in total
days in jail per year for the
behavioral health population with
misdemeanor charges (no felony)
in the year.
22,545
19,377
18,351 18,672
2015 2016 2017 2018
Total days in jail per year for the behavioral health
population with misdemeanor charges (no felony) in
the year
2015-2018:
17% decrease
40
Released to Pretrial
Supervision
• There was a significant increase
in the percentage of inmates in
the behavioral health
population released to pretrial
supervision in 2018 from the
previous year.
• Among the behavioral health
population, those with felony
charges who were released to
pretrial supervision at least
once in 2018 stayed less days in
jail than those who were not
released to pretrial supervision.
22%
16%
31%
19%
Felony Misdemeanor
Released to pre-trial supervision among the
behavioral health population: 2017 vs. 2018
% of behavioral health population
2017 2018
Pretrial supervision up
from 2017 among
inmates in the behavioral
health population
30 DAYS 48 DAYS
Average total days in jail in 2018 for the behavioral
health population with felony:
Pretrial supervision vs. No pretrial supervision
BH with one or more
felony on pretrial
supervision
BH with one or more
felony not on pretrial
supervision
Most Common Charge
Types: BH vs. No BH
• There was a significant difference
between inmates in the behavioral
health population and inmates not
in the behavioral population in
most common types of charge.
• The most frequent charge type for
the behavioral health population
was violation of conditions.
2015-2018:
17% decrease
29%
8%
19%
13%
14%
15%
12%
13%
18%
21%
23%
38%
DWI
Assault/Battery
Alcohol-related charges
Robbery/theft/Larceny
Drug-related charges
Violation of conditions
Most common charge types: Behavioral health population vs. Non-
behavioral health population*
BH No BH
* Ordered by most common charge types among the behavioral health
population
Takeaways
• Over time, there has been a decrease in the number and
the percentage of inmates with behavioral health issues
with low level charges who are frequently in and out of
jail.
• There has been a significant increase in the number of
inmates who are referred to CSB services in jail.
• There has been an increase in the number and the
percentage of the behavioral health population released
to pretrial supervision. For those who were released to
pretrial supervision, days in jail was significantly lower,
especially among the inmates with felony charges.
Methodology & Limitations
• Jail population analysis: Only the inmates who were
booked into jail each year were included.
• Length of Stay and Release analysis: Only the
inmates who were booked and released in the same
year were included.
• “Behavioral health population” was identified from
CSB Electronic Health Record (EHR). The analysis
includes all inmates known to the CSB behavioral
health system regardless of screening results of the
Brief Jail Mental Health Screening or referral to CSB
jail-based services during their stay in jail. Inmates
may not have had active behavioral health issues
upon their booking in 2018.
2019
Sequential Intercept Model
Mapping
Community Reentry
National Association of Counties
(NACo) Leadership Lab
Opportunities for stakeholder
feedback
Next Stakeholders
Meeting
September 30, 2019
7 p.m.
Government Center,
Rooms 9 & 10
46

Diversion First Stakeholders Meeting: May 16, 2019

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Meeting Agenda • Welcome •Announcements • Peer Recovery Supports • Discussion • Community Response Team • 2018 Jail Population Data • Wrap-Up 2
  • 3.
    With Gratitude andAdmiration… Gary Ambrose, Brigadier General, USAF (retired)
  • 4.
    2018 Annual Report •Overview of Diversion First • Highlights from 2018 • Specialty dockets • Community Response Team • Strive to Achieve Recovery (STAR) program • 2018 Data Snapshot • Plans for 2019 4
  • 5.
    Contributing to theField… • Published in early 2019 • A SAMHSA practice guide outlining principles for a quality, community-based behavioral health treatment system • Acknowledged as Expert Panelists! • Captain Tony Shobe, Sheriff’s Office • 2nd Lieutenant Redic Morris, Sheriff’s Office • Marissa Fariña-Morse, Service Director, CSB 5
  • 6.
    Stepping Up for MentalHealth • Stakeholders Meeting! • Annual Report • Mental Health Docket- News4 interview • Veterans Docket Graduation • SAMHSA Webinar on Early Diversion programs • Community presentations
  • 7.
    FY 2020 Budget May7, 2019- Board of Supervisors approved the FY 2020 budget, which included funding for the fourth year of Diversion First: • 12 positions • 6 Health and Human Services • 6 Public Safety • Additional funds for housing assistance and programming 7
  • 8.
    FY 2020 Funding Highlights •Mental Health Docket Coordinator • Behavioral Health positions for Jail Diversion Team • Police and Sheriff’s Sergeants for MCRC • Fire and Rescue Technician and Crisis Intervention Specialists for Community Response Team • Probation Officer for JDRDC • Commonwealth Attorney 8 8
  • 9.
    Mental Health DocketNews Mental Health Docket Approved by the Virginia Supreme Court! Anticipated start- July, 2019 9
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Peer Recovery Supports MichaelLane | Individual and Family Affairs Director Pictures courtesy of unsplash.com, used with permission
  • 12.
    Why Peer Support? Experienceof Disconnection: • Trauma • Unsustainable way of life • Criminality • A reality not shared by others • Devastated Relationships • Irreversible Consequences 12
  • 13.
    Peer Support Connects/ Reconnects •Hope • Options • Treatment • Other Supports • Honesty • Healthy relationships 13
  • 14.
    Shared Experience & NewExperiences A Peer Supporter is a model of: • Overcoming obstacles • Creating and sustaining healthy relationships • Successful employment • Effectively dealing with trauma • Having fun in Recovery • Becoming one’s best self • A fulfilling life 14
  • 15.
    “Natural” vs. “Professional” PeerSupport • “Natural” Peer Support • Examples: • Breast Cancer Survivors • 12-Step Groups and Sponsors • No one is paid for their role • Boundaries determined only by the individuals involved. • “Professional” Peer Support • One individual is paid for their role. • Boundaries are determined by the employer, and the individuals involved
  • 16.
    In Fairfax County STAR Program SpecialtyDockets Emergency Services Residential Substance Use Treatment Programs Jail Diversion Opioid Task Force Wellness & Recovery Centers … and many more
  • 17.
    CSB Emergency Services • Connectto: transportation, food banks, clothing closets, shelters, services at Merrifield and other CSB sites • De-escalate and provide support to address emergent crisis • Drop In group for parents and teenagers (HEADS UP, TALK IT OUT!) • Support groups and workshops • Monitor various spaces … and more!
  • 18.
    Programs across US • InpatientTreatment • Mobile Crisis Teams • Peer-Run Respites • Emergency Departments • Primary Care • Outpatient programs • Re-Entry programs • Inreach to incarcerated …and many more
  • 19.
    Training and Skills • 72hour training • 500 hours of supervised experience • 1 year of demonstrated recovery • Ability to share personal experiences in an intentional, positive manner • Capacity to listen to others share traumatic experiences • Ability to work effectively in multi-disciplinary teams
  • 20.
    Peer Support Values • Hope •Many Paths • Relationship-Focused • Trauma-Informed • Shared Experience • Professionalism 20
  • 21.
    Evidence Base • Astudy of 76 individuals who had been admitted to Yale-New Haven Psychiatric Hospital (all who had at least two psychiatric hospitalizations in the previous 18 months) compared the outcomes of those who had been assigned a peer mentor with the outcomes of those who received standard post-discharge services. The individuals in the peer mentor group had double the average time to psychiatric rehospitalization than those receiving standard care – 270 days compared to 135 days. (O’Connell, et al.; 2018) • Pierce County Washington reduced involuntary hospitalization by 32% by using certified peer specialists offering respite services, leading to a savings of 1.99 million dollars in one year (Bergeson; 2011)
  • 22.
    More Evidence • AFederally Qualified Health Center in Denver (FQHC) that used peer support had an ROI of $2.28 for every $1 spent. • 90% of individuals who used a peer crisis respite in Orange County, NY did not return to the hospital in the subsequent two years. • A Connecticut program demonstrated a significant reduction in criminal charges and alcohol use in the 12 months subsequent to the peer interventions.
  • 23.
    Source: Substance Abuseand Mental Health Services Administration
  • 24.
    Important Considerations • Voluntary • Well-trainedsupervisors • Integration in teams OR Stand-alone • Connection with other Peer Supporters • Avoid • Clinical Drift • Informant Drift
  • 25.
    Where along theSequential Intercept Model would peer supports be most effective? Email: DiversionFirst@fairfaxcounty.gov
  • 26.
    Co-Responder Model (Community ResponseTeam) Abbey May| Emergency and Acute Services Director Kristina Deemark| Public Safety Communication Operations Laura Maddock| Emergency Services Supervisor
  • 27.
    Co-Responder Model Community Response Team (CRT)- Public Safetyand CSB responding together on super utilizers of public safety Diversion Proactive outreach, intervention, Diversion from arrest Reduction Reduction in calls for service for public safety Improvements Increased public safety and community health, more efficient and appropriate use of resources 27
  • 28.
    Community Response Team CRTPilot Operational Updates • MOU • Public Safety Electronic Referral Application Prototype (GIS capability) • CRT Brochure, Intro letter • FRD Internal email referral process CRTPartnerships • Inova ER Social workers (CareView access) • Office to Prevent and End Homelessness • PATH • Shelters • Adult Protective Services and Adult Services • Code Compliance • Peer Recovery Specialists CRTReferrals • MCRC • Crisis Link • Adult Protective Services • Older Adult Programs • Physician/Durable Medical Goods • CSB Services • Inpatient Psychiatric Care • Coordinated Services Planning
  • 29.
    Community Response Team CRTNext Steps • Law Enforcement roll call training • Fire and Rescue Department (FRD) station outreach • Referral reference built into Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) system • FRD Emergency Medical Service (EMS) web based training tool 29
  • 30.
    Community Response Team CurrentSuper-Utilizer Count 30
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
    2018 Jail BehavioralHealth Population Analysis Chloe Lee| Data and Evaluation Manager
  • 34.
    Behavioral Health Population Booked intoJail: 2015-2018 • There was an 8% decrease in the number of inmates in the behavioral health population booked into jail from 2015 to 2018. However, the percentage remained the same (35%). 4,492 4,276 3,983 4,127 35.2% 34.5% 32.1% 35.0% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 4,800 5,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 Number of inmates in behavioral health population % of inmates in behavioral health population 34
  • 35.
    Behavioral Health Population with MisdemeanorCharges: 2015-2018 • The Diversion First population is individuals with behavioral health issues who are frequently in and out of jail with low level charges. • Data shows that the number and the percentage of the target population has decreased over time. 1,854 1,614 1,492 1,507 41.3% 37.8% 37.4% 36.5% 34% 35% 36% 37% 38% 39% 40% 41% 42% 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 Number of behavioral health population with misdmeanor charges and no felony in 2018 % of behavioral health population with misdemeanor charges and no felony 35
  • 36.
    Inmates who were Referredto CSB Jail- based Services: 2015- 2018 • There was a 43% increase in the number of inmates who were referred to CSB jail-based services from 2015 to 2018. 2,286 2,632 3,028 3,275 17.8% 21.2% 24.4% 27.8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 2015 2016 2017 2018 Number of inmates referred to CSB jail-based services % of inmates referred to CSB jail-based servies (all jail population) 36
  • 37.
    2018 Jail BehavioralHealth Population: Demographic Characteristics (N=4,127) 55.2% 41.0% 3.6% 0.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% White Black Asian Other Race 4.1% 10.6% 14.8% 30.1% 20.7% 19.7% 60 or higher 50-59 40-49 30-39 25-29 18-24 Age categories BH No BH Homelessness Gender 6.2% 4%
  • 38.
    2018 Jail Behavioral HealthPopulation: Mental Health Diagnosis (N=4,127) • Over 41% of the behavioral health population (15% of the jail population) had at least one mental health diagnosis. • The most common mental health diagnosis among the behavioral health population was depression. • Female inmates in the behavioral health population were more likely to have a mental health diagnosis than male inmates. 01 • DEPRESSION 12.1% 02 • PTSD 7.2% 03 • BIPOLAR DISORDER 6.6% Most Common MH Diagnosis 59% of the female inmates in the behavioral health population had mental health diagnosis (21% of all female inmates booked into jail in 2018). of the male inmates in the behavioral health population had mental health diagnosis (13% of all male inmates booked into jail in 2018).38% 38
  • 39.
    2018 Jail Behavioral HealthPopulation: Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Diagnosis (N=4,127) • 58% of the behavioral health population (20% of the jail population) had at least one SUD diagnosis, including alcohol. • Male inmates in the behavioral health population were more likely to have an SUD diagnosis than female except for opioid- related diagnosis. • 62% of the white inmates in the behavioral health population had an SUD diagnosis. 30% 19% 38%36% 13% 43% Alcohol Opioid Other SUD SUD by Gender % of male/female behavioral health population Female Male 62% 54% 45% White Black Asian SUD by Race % of white/black/Asian behavioral health population
  • 40.
    Days in Jail •There was a 17% decrease in total days in jail per year for the behavioral health population with misdemeanor charges (no felony) in the year. 22,545 19,377 18,351 18,672 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total days in jail per year for the behavioral health population with misdemeanor charges (no felony) in the year 2015-2018: 17% decrease 40
  • 41.
    Released to Pretrial Supervision •There was a significant increase in the percentage of inmates in the behavioral health population released to pretrial supervision in 2018 from the previous year. • Among the behavioral health population, those with felony charges who were released to pretrial supervision at least once in 2018 stayed less days in jail than those who were not released to pretrial supervision. 22% 16% 31% 19% Felony Misdemeanor Released to pre-trial supervision among the behavioral health population: 2017 vs. 2018 % of behavioral health population 2017 2018 Pretrial supervision up from 2017 among inmates in the behavioral health population 30 DAYS 48 DAYS Average total days in jail in 2018 for the behavioral health population with felony: Pretrial supervision vs. No pretrial supervision BH with one or more felony on pretrial supervision BH with one or more felony not on pretrial supervision
  • 42.
    Most Common Charge Types:BH vs. No BH • There was a significant difference between inmates in the behavioral health population and inmates not in the behavioral population in most common types of charge. • The most frequent charge type for the behavioral health population was violation of conditions. 2015-2018: 17% decrease 29% 8% 19% 13% 14% 15% 12% 13% 18% 21% 23% 38% DWI Assault/Battery Alcohol-related charges Robbery/theft/Larceny Drug-related charges Violation of conditions Most common charge types: Behavioral health population vs. Non- behavioral health population* BH No BH * Ordered by most common charge types among the behavioral health population
  • 43.
    Takeaways • Over time,there has been a decrease in the number and the percentage of inmates with behavioral health issues with low level charges who are frequently in and out of jail. • There has been a significant increase in the number of inmates who are referred to CSB services in jail. • There has been an increase in the number and the percentage of the behavioral health population released to pretrial supervision. For those who were released to pretrial supervision, days in jail was significantly lower, especially among the inmates with felony charges.
  • 44.
    Methodology & Limitations •Jail population analysis: Only the inmates who were booked into jail each year were included. • Length of Stay and Release analysis: Only the inmates who were booked and released in the same year were included. • “Behavioral health population” was identified from CSB Electronic Health Record (EHR). The analysis includes all inmates known to the CSB behavioral health system regardless of screening results of the Brief Jail Mental Health Screening or referral to CSB jail-based services during their stay in jail. Inmates may not have had active behavioral health issues upon their booking in 2018.
  • 45.
    2019 Sequential Intercept Model Mapping CommunityReentry National Association of Counties (NACo) Leadership Lab Opportunities for stakeholder feedback
  • 46.
    Next Stakeholders Meeting September 30,2019 7 p.m. Government Center, Rooms 9 & 10 46

Editor's Notes

  • #12 Introduce myself. Background in Peer Support, and Organizational Development Homeless 3x. Very easily could have gone to jail Serious mental illness for decades. Various Diagnoses, but always it was serious and chronic. Something I manage to this day. Peer Supporter The experience of everyone is different
  • #13 Disconnection from one’s best self. From the community. Is enormously disruptive, trapped, there is no way out. Hope is gone, the barriers to success seem insurmountable. Even in the moments when you want to stop, the desire, the opportunities, the temptation are incredibly powerful. Responding to a world, a reality, that others can’t grapple with. Behavior that causes dramatic distress. Willing to consider anything to escape. Frequently to escape the trauma of their lives, the families, abuse. Or it all came for no reason. Just unlucky. These are conditions of disconnection. Disconnected from one’s best, truest self. Disconnection from forms of love from family of origon, or choice. Disconnection from the cultural norms. Literal disconnection from incarceration. Disconnected from those why say they’ll help. Cause acute distress in family, friends, individual strangers victimized, Turn the darkness of years that feel lost, no good, into something wonderful and generative.
  • #14 What’s REALLY going on. Sometimes will tell you something that they won’t tell others. Cultural connections
  • #16 For example, in Professional Peer Support When your behavior itself is changing how others respond to you, and your capacity to tackle the rest of the world, it is hard to affiliate in a healthy manner. Sometimes you have no experience of a healthy way of living. None at all. No frame of reference. Nobody in your circle to turn to, on nobody you haven’t burned a bridge with. This is one reason why professional peer support in behavioral health takes root beyond the grassroots. Example boundary: Calling at 2am. Dating.
  • #17 STAR program work in partnership
  • #22 Little research has been done on peer specialists in forensic settings. However, in looking to divert, much of the research focuses on diversion from hospitalization.
  • #36 Number: 19% decrease from 2015 to 2018.