SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
My storybook of Jury cases
By Eleanor Walker
Bushells Case
• The jury refused to convict the defendants so were imprisoned by the
judges. The judge said “you shall not be dismissed until we have a verdict
that the court will accept”. The jurors were locked up without meat, drink,
fire or tobacco in a prison cell until the paid a fine.
• This case is important because what came out of it was the reminder of
juries being ‘the sole arbiter of fact’.
R v Ponting 1985
• Clive Ponting sent confidential documents about the sinking of a ship to a
labour backbencher. He was definitely guilty but the jury acquitted him
arguing that his prosecution was politically inspired.
• Point of law: Jury equity- advantage questions.
R v Owen 1992
• The defendants son had been killed by a careless driver and was sent to
prison for 12 months. This did not appease his anger so he went to the
defendants house after he was out of prison and fired at him with a
shotgun, wounding him.
• The defendant was acquitted as the jury shared his feelings of outrage
• Point of law: juries can create perverse decisions and still get away with it-
disadvantage questions.
R v Kronlid 1996
• 3 women broke onto a plane and caused £1.5 million worth of damage, the
women did leave a video explaining their actions though.
• Their case got acquitted because the jury believed they did it for right reasons-
stopping the plane from arriving in East Timor to attack the survivors.
• Point of law: jury equity.
R v Rayment and others
• Evidence was given over a course of 5 months due to recurring illness and
commitments with the jury.
• Too much time between the giving of evidence made the jurors decision
less accurate so the trial is unfair.
• Point of law: too much time (disadvantages questions)
Brinks Mat Trial
• Robbers stole gold bullion ( £26 million worth of gold, diamonds and cash).
They poured petrol over staff and threatened them with a lit match if they
did not reveal the combination numbers of the vault.
• They got sentenced to 25 years imprisonment for armed robbery and one
defendant, Noye, was fined £500,000 plus £200,000 costs.
• Point of law:
R v Green 2007
• After shooting his father he was sentenced to 9 years imprisonment
charged with manslaughter.
• He appealed against his sentence stating it was out of line for offences of
domestic violence in which the victim is seen to have been subjected to.
• The court decided the sentence was appropriate to 5 or 6 years .His
sentence was reduced considerably.
• Point of law:
R v West
• Guilty rosemary west murdered 10 young girls and she appealed arguing
that the media influenced her case. The judge dismissed her appeal
stating even if she had a brand new case she would still be ruled guilty as
the allegations of murder were sufficiently horrendous.
• Point of law: media influence (disadvantage questions).

More Related Content

What's hot

Cultivation theory
Cultivation theoryCultivation theory
Cultivation theorykaysar.khan
 
Subcultural strain theorists l1
Subcultural strain theorists l1Subcultural strain theorists l1
Subcultural strain theorists l1smccormac7
 
Hate crimes
Hate crimesHate crimes
Hate crimesrjluke2
 
Labelling theories of Crime
Labelling theories of CrimeLabelling theories of Crime
Labelling theories of Crimedesmondtwsa
 
Crime and Deviance - Subcultural Approach
Crime and Deviance - Subcultural ApproachCrime and Deviance - Subcultural Approach
Crime and Deviance - Subcultural ApproachRachel Jones
 
Differential Association Theory- Cunningham
Differential Association Theory- CunninghamDifferential Association Theory- Cunningham
Differential Association Theory- Cunningham2576390
 
Ppt made on gender related issue ('women in crime')
Ppt made on gender related issue ('women in crime')Ppt made on gender related issue ('women in crime')
Ppt made on gender related issue ('women in crime')ihedce
 
Postmodernist theory of crime and deviance
Postmodernist theory of crime and deviancePostmodernist theory of crime and deviance
Postmodernist theory of crime and devianceThomasZ St. Louis
 
Haynes vs harwood
Haynes vs harwoodHaynes vs harwood
Haynes vs harwoodatik lodha
 
Capital punishment
Capital punishmentCapital punishment
Capital punishmentSadiul Islam
 
Crime and deviance and the media
Crime and deviance and the mediaCrime and deviance and the media
Crime and deviance and the mediasmccormac7
 
Gender and crime the basics
Gender and crime the basicsGender and crime the basics
Gender and crime the basicsmattyp99
 
Common Law Vs Civil Law
Common Law Vs Civil LawCommon Law Vs Civil Law
Common Law Vs Civil Lawyunudeni
 
Citizen and embedded journalism
Citizen and embedded journalismCitizen and embedded journalism
Citizen and embedded journalismRukhshan Mir
 
media system theory
media system theorymedia system theory
media system theoryIrum Shekh
 
Gary ridgeway project Brett
Gary ridgeway project BrettGary ridgeway project Brett
Gary ridgeway project Brettmabrandt
 
William Bonger's Economic Theory of causation of Crime
William Bonger's Economic Theory of causation of CrimeWilliam Bonger's Economic Theory of causation of Crime
William Bonger's Economic Theory of causation of CrimeRitu Gautam
 

What's hot (20)

Actus reus
Actus reusActus reus
Actus reus
 
Cultivation theory
Cultivation theoryCultivation theory
Cultivation theory
 
Subcultural strain theorists l1
Subcultural strain theorists l1Subcultural strain theorists l1
Subcultural strain theorists l1
 
Hate crimes
Hate crimesHate crimes
Hate crimes
 
Media industries theories
Media industries theoriesMedia industries theories
Media industries theories
 
Labelling theories of Crime
Labelling theories of CrimeLabelling theories of Crime
Labelling theories of Crime
 
Crime and Deviance - Subcultural Approach
Crime and Deviance - Subcultural ApproachCrime and Deviance - Subcultural Approach
Crime and Deviance - Subcultural Approach
 
Differential Association Theory- Cunningham
Differential Association Theory- CunninghamDifferential Association Theory- Cunningham
Differential Association Theory- Cunningham
 
Ppt made on gender related issue ('women in crime')
Ppt made on gender related issue ('women in crime')Ppt made on gender related issue ('women in crime')
Ppt made on gender related issue ('women in crime')
 
Postmodernist theory of crime and deviance
Postmodernist theory of crime and deviancePostmodernist theory of crime and deviance
Postmodernist theory of crime and deviance
 
Haynes vs harwood
Haynes vs harwoodHaynes vs harwood
Haynes vs harwood
 
Capital punishment
Capital punishmentCapital punishment
Capital punishment
 
Critical Legal Studies (CLS) Defined
Critical Legal Studies (CLS) DefinedCritical Legal Studies (CLS) Defined
Critical Legal Studies (CLS) Defined
 
Crime and deviance and the media
Crime and deviance and the mediaCrime and deviance and the media
Crime and deviance and the media
 
Gender and crime the basics
Gender and crime the basicsGender and crime the basics
Gender and crime the basics
 
Common Law Vs Civil Law
Common Law Vs Civil LawCommon Law Vs Civil Law
Common Law Vs Civil Law
 
Citizen and embedded journalism
Citizen and embedded journalismCitizen and embedded journalism
Citizen and embedded journalism
 
media system theory
media system theorymedia system theory
media system theory
 
Gary ridgeway project Brett
Gary ridgeway project BrettGary ridgeway project Brett
Gary ridgeway project Brett
 
William Bonger's Economic Theory of causation of Crime
William Bonger's Economic Theory of causation of CrimeWilliam Bonger's Economic Theory of causation of Crime
William Bonger's Economic Theory of causation of Crime
 

Similar to Jury cases

Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishmentUnit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishmentWan Farida Hamimi
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
Social care claims club, March 2017, ExeterSocial care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
Social care claims club, March 2017, ExeterBrowne Jacobson LLP
 
Social care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
Social care claims club, February 2017, BirminghamSocial care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
Social care claims club, February 2017, BirminghamBrowne Jacobson LLP
 
negligence.pptx
negligence.pptxnegligence.pptx
negligence.pptxZaina59
 
5. Consideration.pptx
5. Consideration.pptx5. Consideration.pptx
5. Consideration.pptxAlizaIshra
 
Criminal Lawyer in Vancouver
Criminal Lawyer in VancouverCriminal Lawyer in Vancouver
Criminal Lawyer in Vancouverkontoulawbc
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
Social care claims club, March 2017, NottinghamSocial care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
Social care claims club, March 2017, NottinghamBrowne Jacobson LLP
 
Social care claims club, February 2017, London
Social care claims club, February 2017, LondonSocial care claims club, February 2017, London
Social care claims club, February 2017, LondonBrowne Jacobson LLP
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
Social care claims club, March 2017, ManchesterSocial care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
Social care claims club, March 2017, ManchesterBrowne Jacobson LLP
 

Similar to Jury cases (9)

Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishmentUnit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
Social care claims club, March 2017, ExeterSocial care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
Social care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
 
Social care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
Social care claims club, February 2017, BirminghamSocial care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
Social care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
 
negligence.pptx
negligence.pptxnegligence.pptx
negligence.pptx
 
5. Consideration.pptx
5. Consideration.pptx5. Consideration.pptx
5. Consideration.pptx
 
Criminal Lawyer in Vancouver
Criminal Lawyer in VancouverCriminal Lawyer in Vancouver
Criminal Lawyer in Vancouver
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
Social care claims club, March 2017, NottinghamSocial care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
Social care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
 
Social care claims club, February 2017, London
Social care claims club, February 2017, LondonSocial care claims club, February 2017, London
Social care claims club, February 2017, London
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
Social care claims club, March 2017, ManchesterSocial care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
Social care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
 

Recently uploaded

Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxMunicipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxSHIVAMGUPTA671167
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxRRR Chambers
 
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueAndrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueSkyLaw Professional Corporation
 
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881mayurchatre90
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubham Wadhonkar
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfPoojaGadiya1
 
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)Delhi Call girls
 
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxPowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxca2or2tx
 
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptxTransferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx2020000445musaib
 
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书SS A
 
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxHuman Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxfilippoluciani9
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm2020000445musaib
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULEsreeramsaipranitha
 
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptxCOPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptxRRR Chambers
 
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxKEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxRRR Chambers
 
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labourTHE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labourBhavikaGholap1
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxRRR Chambers
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxMunicipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
 
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueAndrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
 
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
 
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
 
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxPowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
 
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
 
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptxTransferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
 
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版西澳大学毕业证学位证书
 
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxHuman Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
 
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
 
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptxCOPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
 
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxKEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
 
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labourTHE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labour
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
 
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 7 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 7 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 7 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 7 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
 

Jury cases

  • 1. My storybook of Jury cases By Eleanor Walker
  • 2. Bushells Case • The jury refused to convict the defendants so were imprisoned by the judges. The judge said “you shall not be dismissed until we have a verdict that the court will accept”. The jurors were locked up without meat, drink, fire or tobacco in a prison cell until the paid a fine. • This case is important because what came out of it was the reminder of juries being ‘the sole arbiter of fact’.
  • 3. R v Ponting 1985 • Clive Ponting sent confidential documents about the sinking of a ship to a labour backbencher. He was definitely guilty but the jury acquitted him arguing that his prosecution was politically inspired. • Point of law: Jury equity- advantage questions.
  • 4. R v Owen 1992 • The defendants son had been killed by a careless driver and was sent to prison for 12 months. This did not appease his anger so he went to the defendants house after he was out of prison and fired at him with a shotgun, wounding him. • The defendant was acquitted as the jury shared his feelings of outrage • Point of law: juries can create perverse decisions and still get away with it- disadvantage questions.
  • 5. R v Kronlid 1996 • 3 women broke onto a plane and caused £1.5 million worth of damage, the women did leave a video explaining their actions though. • Their case got acquitted because the jury believed they did it for right reasons- stopping the plane from arriving in East Timor to attack the survivors. • Point of law: jury equity.
  • 6. R v Rayment and others • Evidence was given over a course of 5 months due to recurring illness and commitments with the jury. • Too much time between the giving of evidence made the jurors decision less accurate so the trial is unfair. • Point of law: too much time (disadvantages questions)
  • 7. Brinks Mat Trial • Robbers stole gold bullion ( £26 million worth of gold, diamonds and cash). They poured petrol over staff and threatened them with a lit match if they did not reveal the combination numbers of the vault. • They got sentenced to 25 years imprisonment for armed robbery and one defendant, Noye, was fined £500,000 plus £200,000 costs. • Point of law:
  • 8. R v Green 2007 • After shooting his father he was sentenced to 9 years imprisonment charged with manslaughter. • He appealed against his sentence stating it was out of line for offences of domestic violence in which the victim is seen to have been subjected to. • The court decided the sentence was appropriate to 5 or 6 years .His sentence was reduced considerably. • Point of law:
  • 9. R v West • Guilty rosemary west murdered 10 young girls and she appealed arguing that the media influenced her case. The judge dismissed her appeal stating even if she had a brand new case she would still be ruled guilty as the allegations of murder were sufficiently horrendous. • Point of law: media influence (disadvantage questions).