SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
2015 Mathematics State Snapshot Report
North Carolina ■ Grade 8 ■ Public Schools
Overall Results
In 2015, the average score of eighth-grade students in North Carolina
was 281. This was not significantly different from the average score of
281 for public school students in the nation.
The average score for students in North Carolina in 2015 (281) was
lower than their average score in 2013 (286) and was higher than their
average score in 2000 (276).
The percentage of students in North Carolina who performed at or
above the NAEP Proficient level was 33 percent in 2015. This percentage
was not significantly different from that in 2013 (36 percent) and was
greater than that in 2000 (27 percent).
The percentage of students in North Carolina who performed at or
above the NAEP Basic level was 69 percent in 2015. This percentage was
smaller than that in 2013 (75 percent) and was not significantly different
from that in 2000 (67 percent).
Achievement-Level Percentages and Average Score
Results
* Significantly different (p < .05) from state's results in 2015. Significance tests were
performed using unrounded numbers.
NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.
Compare the Average Score in 2015 to Other
States/Jurisdictions
In 2015, the average score in North Carolina (281) was
■
■
lower than those in 16 states/jurisdictions
■
higher than those in 12 states/jurisdictions
not significantly different from those in 23 states/jurisdictions
DoDEA = Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools)
Average Scores for State/Jurisdiction and Nation
(public)
* Significantly different (p < .05) from 2015. Significance tests were performed using
unrounded numbers.
Results for Student Groups in 2015
Percentage
of
Percentage at Percentage
Avg. or above at
Reporting Groups students score Basic Proficient Advanced
Race/Ethnicity
White 52 292 81 43 13
Black 25 263 50 16 2
Hispanic 16 273 63 23 3
Asian 3 311 85 62 36
American Indian/Alaska Native 1 261 45 17 2
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander # ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
Two or more races 3 274 63 27 3
Gender
Male 51 281 67 33 10
Female 49 282 71 33 8
National School Lunch Program
Eligible 58 268 58 19 3
Not eligible 42 299 85 52 18
# Rounds to zero.
‡ Reporting standards not met.
NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding, and because the "Information not
available" category for the National School Lunch Program, which provides
free/reduced-price lunches, is not displayed. Black includes African American and Hispanic
includes Latino. Race categories exclude Hispanic origin.
Score Gaps for Student Groups
In 2015, Black students had an average score that was 29 points lower
than that for White students. This performance gap was not
significantly different from that in 2000 (35 points).
In 2015, Hispanic students had an average score that was 20 points
lower than that for White students. Data are not reported for Hispanic
students in 2000, because reporting standards were not met.
In 2015, male students in North Carolina had an average score that was
not significantly different from that for female students.
In 2015, students who were eligible for free/reduced-price school lunch,
an indicator of low family income, had an average score that was 31
points lower than that for students who were not eligible. This
performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2000 (28
points).
NOTE: Statistical comparisons are calculated on the basis of unrounded scale scores or percentages.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
various years, 2000-2015 Mathematics Assessments.

More Related Content

More from EducationNC

FTE STATE BOARD SLIDE DECK (1)_3448851rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
FTE STATE BOARD SLIDE DECK (1)_3448851rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdfFTE STATE BOARD SLIDE DECK (1)_3448851rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
FTE STATE BOARD SLIDE DECK (1)_3448851rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
EducationNC
 
Government Affairs January 2023 SBE Budget Presentation (DRAFT)_3448671rr0isz...
Government Affairs January 2023 SBE Budget Presentation (DRAFT)_3448671rr0isz...Government Affairs January 2023 SBE Budget Presentation (DRAFT)_3448671rr0isz...
Government Affairs January 2023 SBE Budget Presentation (DRAFT)_3448671rr0isz...
EducationNC
 
SBE Strategic Plan Discussion - January 2023_3445821rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
SBE Strategic Plan Discussion - January 2023_3445821rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdfSBE Strategic Plan Discussion - January 2023_3445821rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
SBE Strategic Plan Discussion - January 2023_3445821rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
EducationNC
 
22_12_GCA_1_PPT_ 2023 Leg Requests NC General Assembly Long Session_3428961rr...
22_12_GCA_1_PPT_ 2023 Leg Requests NC General Assembly Long Session_3428961rr...22_12_GCA_1_PPT_ 2023 Leg Requests NC General Assembly Long Session_3428961rr...
22_12_GCA_1_PPT_ 2023 Leg Requests NC General Assembly Long Session_3428961rr...
EducationNC
 

More from EducationNC (20)

CS K12 Legislative Brief House Ed January 2023.pdf
CS K12 Legislative Brief House Ed January 2023.pdfCS K12 Legislative Brief House Ed January 2023.pdf
CS K12 Legislative Brief House Ed January 2023.pdf
 
FINAL_NCASA 2023 Legislative Priorities_rev. 1.6.23.pdf
FINAL_NCASA 2023 Legislative Priorities_rev. 1.6.23.pdfFINAL_NCASA 2023 Legislative Priorities_rev. 1.6.23.pdf
FINAL_NCASA 2023 Legislative Priorities_rev. 1.6.23.pdf
 
FTE STATE BOARD SLIDE DECK (1)_3448851rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
FTE STATE BOARD SLIDE DECK (1)_3448851rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdfFTE STATE BOARD SLIDE DECK (1)_3448851rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
FTE STATE BOARD SLIDE DECK (1)_3448851rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
 
Government Affairs January 2023 SBE Budget Presentation (DRAFT)_3448671rr0isz...
Government Affairs January 2023 SBE Budget Presentation (DRAFT)_3448671rr0isz...Government Affairs January 2023 SBE Budget Presentation (DRAFT)_3448671rr0isz...
Government Affairs January 2023 SBE Budget Presentation (DRAFT)_3448671rr0isz...
 
SBE Strategic Plan Discussion - January 2023_3445821rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
SBE Strategic Plan Discussion - January 2023_3445821rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdfSBE Strategic Plan Discussion - January 2023_3445821rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
SBE Strategic Plan Discussion - January 2023_3445821rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
 
COVID Impacts
COVID ImpactsCOVID Impacts
COVID Impacts
 
Pathways -- Statutory and other changes for Pilot Program - January 2023 Draf...
Pathways -- Statutory and other changes for Pilot Program - January 2023 Draf...Pathways -- Statutory and other changes for Pilot Program - January 2023 Draf...
Pathways -- Statutory and other changes for Pilot Program - January 2023 Draf...
 
States NOF Ex. A - Affidavit of Anca Grozav.pdf
States NOF Ex. A - Affidavit of Anca Grozav.pdfStates NOF Ex. A - Affidavit of Anca Grozav.pdf
States NOF Ex. A - Affidavit of Anca Grozav.pdf
 
Rule 14.3 Report to the Court.pdf
Rule 14.3 Report to the Court.pdfRule 14.3 Report to the Court.pdf
Rule 14.3 Report to the Court.pdf
 
Order Reassigning Case.pdf
Order Reassigning Case.pdfOrder Reassigning Case.pdf
Order Reassigning Case.pdf
 
Letter from Judge Robinson to Chief Justice Newby-2.pdf
Letter from Judge Robinson to Chief Justice Newby-2.pdfLetter from Judge Robinson to Chief Justice Newby-2.pdf
Letter from Judge Robinson to Chief Justice Newby-2.pdf
 
DRAFT JLEOC Committee Report.pdf
DRAFT JLEOC Committee Report.pdfDRAFT JLEOC Committee Report.pdf
DRAFT JLEOC Committee Report.pdf
 
221110_Model_Updated_3414051ndi34uk1r1sojyjj1jjmfxd.pdf
221110_Model_Updated_3414051ndi34uk1r1sojyjj1jjmfxd.pdf221110_Model_Updated_3414051ndi34uk1r1sojyjj1jjmfxd.pdf
221110_Model_Updated_3414051ndi34uk1r1sojyjj1jjmfxd.pdf
 
221208_SBE Motion_PEPSC Work_3433901rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
221208_SBE Motion_PEPSC Work_3433901rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf221208_SBE Motion_PEPSC Work_3433901rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
221208_SBE Motion_PEPSC Work_3433901rr0iszrpy5ecvm1plgvnywf.pdf
 
22_12_GCA_1_PPT_ 2023 Leg Requests NC General Assembly Long Session_3428961rr...
22_12_GCA_1_PPT_ 2023 Leg Requests NC General Assembly Long Session_3428961rr...22_12_GCA_1_PPT_ 2023 Leg Requests NC General Assembly Long Session_3428961rr...
22_12_GCA_1_PPT_ 2023 Leg Requests NC General Assembly Long Session_3428961rr...
 
District Data.pdf
District Data.pdfDistrict Data.pdf
District Data.pdf
 
Public School Forum of NC 2022 Primer
Public School Forum of NC 2022 PrimerPublic School Forum of NC 2022 Primer
Public School Forum of NC 2022 Primer
 
Senator Tillis child nutrition letter
Senator Tillis child nutrition letterSenator Tillis child nutrition letter
Senator Tillis child nutrition letter
 
Impact Brief
Impact BriefImpact Brief
Impact Brief
 
Teacher Compensation & Benefits
Teacher Compensation & BenefitsTeacher Compensation & Benefits
Teacher Compensation & Benefits
 

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdfUGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 

NCES 2015 Mathematics State Snapshot Report - Grade 8

  • 1. 2015 Mathematics State Snapshot Report North Carolina ■ Grade 8 ■ Public Schools Overall Results In 2015, the average score of eighth-grade students in North Carolina was 281. This was not significantly different from the average score of 281 for public school students in the nation. The average score for students in North Carolina in 2015 (281) was lower than their average score in 2013 (286) and was higher than their average score in 2000 (276). The percentage of students in North Carolina who performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level was 33 percent in 2015. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2013 (36 percent) and was greater than that in 2000 (27 percent). The percentage of students in North Carolina who performed at or above the NAEP Basic level was 69 percent in 2015. This percentage was smaller than that in 2013 (75 percent) and was not significantly different from that in 2000 (67 percent). Achievement-Level Percentages and Average Score Results * Significantly different (p < .05) from state's results in 2015. Significance tests were performed using unrounded numbers. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Compare the Average Score in 2015 to Other States/Jurisdictions In 2015, the average score in North Carolina (281) was ■ ■ lower than those in 16 states/jurisdictions ■ higher than those in 12 states/jurisdictions not significantly different from those in 23 states/jurisdictions DoDEA = Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools) Average Scores for State/Jurisdiction and Nation (public) * Significantly different (p < .05) from 2015. Significance tests were performed using unrounded numbers. Results for Student Groups in 2015 Percentage of Percentage at Percentage Avg. or above at Reporting Groups students score Basic Proficient Advanced Race/Ethnicity White 52 292 81 43 13 Black 25 263 50 16 2 Hispanic 16 273 63 23 3 Asian 3 311 85 62 36 American Indian/Alaska Native 1 261 45 17 2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander # ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Two or more races 3 274 63 27 3 Gender Male 51 281 67 33 10 Female 49 282 71 33 8 National School Lunch Program Eligible 58 268 58 19 3 Not eligible 42 299 85 52 18 # Rounds to zero. ‡ Reporting standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding, and because the "Information not available" category for the National School Lunch Program, which provides free/reduced-price lunches, is not displayed. Black includes African American and Hispanic includes Latino. Race categories exclude Hispanic origin. Score Gaps for Student Groups In 2015, Black students had an average score that was 29 points lower than that for White students. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2000 (35 points). In 2015, Hispanic students had an average score that was 20 points lower than that for White students. Data are not reported for Hispanic students in 2000, because reporting standards were not met. In 2015, male students in North Carolina had an average score that was not significantly different from that for female students. In 2015, students who were eligible for free/reduced-price school lunch, an indicator of low family income, had an average score that was 31 points lower than that for students who were not eligible. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2000 (28 points). NOTE: Statistical comparisons are calculated on the basis of unrounded scale scores or percentages. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 2000-2015 Mathematics Assessments.