This document discusses the importance of network neutrality and open access to digital networks and technologies. It argues that previous industrial revolutions were enabled by new infrastructure like canals, railways, and electricity which allowed for free exchange of ideas and innovation. However, modern digital networks risk being controlled by monopolies if network neutrality is not maintained and access remains open and free of restrictions. The future of conversation and community depends on preventing network owners from exerting control over content and applications.
1. THE BATTLE TO WIN
LOCAL NET NEUTRALITY
Malcolm J. Matson
malcolm.matson@oplan.org
2. Since the beginning of time, the
human spirit has thrived on
CONVERSATION
being able to exchange ideas, emotions,
information and creative output in
freely formed relationships with other people
3. Since the beginning of time, the
human spirit has thrived on
PEER-TO-PEER
being able to exchange ideas, emotions,
information and creative output in
freely formed relationships with other people
4. Since the beginning of time, the
human spirit has thrived on
CONVERSATION
being able to exchange ideas, emotions,
information and creative output in
freely formed relationships with other people
10. 10th March 1876 “Mr Matson
come here – I
At the end of the very day that Alexandra Graham
want to see you”
Bell spoke the first ever words over the telephone,
he wrote to his Father …
“ Dear Papa….I feel that I have at last found the solution of a great
problem, and the day is coming when telegraph wires will be laid on to
houses just like water or gas is, and friends will converse with each
other without leaving homes.quot;
CONVERSATION
11. CONVERSATION
USER CREATED CONTENT
…lay at the very heart of the telephony industry for its
first century of world-changing impact
requires open,
unmediated and
symmetrical
connectivity
Network Neutrality
13. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
my
the world
my village,
ME home &
beyond
town or city
workplace
14. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
my
my world
my village,
ME home &
beyond
town or city
workplace
FAMILY & PHYSICAL VIRTUALSOCI
PRIVATE
WORK SOCIAL AL NETWORKS
NETWORK
NETWORK NETWORK
15. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
ME
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
MY VILLAGE,
TOWN OR CITY
MY WORLD
BEYOND
…our CONVERSATIONdynamically
interacts across all four domains of community
in which we live our ’real’ lives
16. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
PRIVATE
NETWORK
ME
- Edge-to-Edge
UNMEDIATED
UNMETREDPassive
-
UNDIFFERENTIATED - Symmetrical
NON-PROPRIETORY - Open Access IP
NET NEUTRALITY
17. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
HOME
NETWORK
ME
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
- Edge-to-Edge
UNMEDIATED
- Passive
UNMETRED
UNDIFFERENTIATED - Symmetrical
NON-PROPRIETORY - Open Access IP
NET NEUTRALITY
18. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
ME
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
OFFICE UNMEDIATED - Edge-to-Edge
UNMETRED - Passive
NETWORK UNDIFFERENTIATED - Symmetrical
NON-PROPRIETORY - Open Access IP
NET NEUTRALITY
19. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
ME
CONVERSATION
MY HOME &
UNMEDIATED - Edge-to-Edge
WORKPLACE
UNMETRED - Passive
UNDIFFERENTIATED - Symmetrical
NON-PROPRIETORY - Open Access IP
MY ‘WORLD THE INTERNET
BEYOND’
NETWORK
NETWORK NEUTRALITY
20. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
HOME
NETWORK
ME
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
Who and how do
we pay for the hub
HOME
and cabling?
NETWORK
21. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
HOME
NETWORK
ME
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
…or the WiFi
cards and
wireless router?
22. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
WORKNET
WORK
ME
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
…same principle
in the office -
WHO funds the
-network?
23. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
ME
each user buys a “piece of cable and we
share the cost of the router
the family or company could purchase and
MY HOME &
own it all outright
WORKPLACE
they could lease it from a third party who
There are several provides the financing
available options
… whichever option we choose,athere partyno
“The last thing we ought to do is let third are buy
ongoing restrictions or costs to usage
it all, own and control it and then offer us a ‘service’
based on charging us as much as it can for using
it - but only in a manner which they dictate”
24. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
HOME OR OFFICE NETWORK
ME
Once you have found a
means of financing the
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
‘bits of hardware’ – the
‘software bits’ go FREE!
IN THE DIGITAL WORLD, THIS BUSINESS MODEL
OR PRINCIPLE IS SCALEABLE WITHOUT LIMIT
NETWORK NEUTRALITY
25. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
ME
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
MY VILLAGE,
TOWN OR CITY
MY WORLD
BEYOND
?
NETWORK
NETWORK NEUTRALITY NETWORK NEUTRALITY
CAPTIVE
28. re are few exceptions
My subjectslive in
cities but „we‟ live in
I My subjects may
live in a WALLED
live in villages , a CASTLE.
GARDEN… but it‟s
…or two
towns and cities
bigger and better
but WE live in a
than HIS!
castle
29. Mr Bell’s ‘LocalNet’
Scarce
‘Dumb’ CPE
Capacity
PTT
Intelligence in
Central office
30. PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
$
Trunk / International
CITIES
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
$
31. PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
$
Trunk / International
$
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
$
32. in order to allocate
„scarce‟ network capacity
A dedicated „dumb‟
instrument …
to access routing
„intelligence‟
within the network…
to enable…
CONVERSATION
33. Telephone Operators Business Model
ENTIRELY DICTATED BY THE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE TECHNOLOGY
GENERATING REVENUE BY:
a) charging end users for exclusive use of a pair of copper wires
from their home/desk to the local exchange plus selling or
renting them CPE(handset)
b) the orderly allocation of scarcity - trunk and international
network capacity (bandwidth) – charging by time & distance
latterly, developing and selling network embedded „value
c)
added‟ services and „content‟
VERTICALLY INTEGRATED
SERVICE PROVIDER BUSINESS MODEL
INFRASTRUCTURE + OPERATION + SERVICES
34. Total annual cost to the world =
$ multi trillion
a) charging end users for exclusive use of a pair of copper wires
from their home/desk to the local exchange plus selling or
renting them CPE(handset)
b) the orderly allocation of scarcity - trunk and international
network capacity (bandwidth) – charging by time & distance
latterly, developing and selling network embedded „value
c)
added‟ services and „content‟
VERTICALLY INTEGRATED
SERVICE PROVIDER BUSINESS MODEL
INFRASTRUCTURE + OPERATION + SERVICES
35. THREE GREAT DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY
silicon chip silicate glass spread spectrum
fibre
DIGITAL SOFTWARE
COMPUTER OPTICAL FIBRE CONTROLLED
RADIO
37. POLITICAL DRIVE FOR PRIVATISATION,
COMPETITION & REGULATION
MARKET DEPLOYMENT & TAKE-OFF
FOR THE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
38. POLITICAL DRIVE FOR PRIVATISATION, COMPETITION & REGULATION
BRIGHTON
1889
FOLKSTONE
PORTSMOUTH
GLOUCESTER
HULL
NATIONAL
1880s M&A TELEPHONE
TUNBRIDGE
GLASGOW WELLS
COMPANY
SWANSEA
DERBY
BRISTOL
Nationalisation
Local telephone companies and networks were „forced‟ 1912
into a national monopoly status by state nationalisation
19
84
Privatisation
39. POLITICAL DRIVE FOR PRIVATISATION, COMPETITION & REGULATION
The same process of distorting „state intervention‟
took place in almost every country around the globe
19
84 PTT
Privatisation
40. Great Britain
Local connectivity and access
throughout every nation
provided by a single, formerly
nationalised monopoly carrier
operating a vertically
integrated ‘service provider’
business model
41. France
Local connectivity and access
throughout every nation
provided by a single, formerly
nationalised monopoly carrier
operating a vertically
integrated ‘service provider’
business model
42. Italy
Local connectivity and access
throughout every nation
provided by a single, formerly
nationalised monopoly carrier
operating a vertically
integrated ‘service provider’
business model
43. Germany
Local connectivity and access
throughout every nation
provided by a single, formerly
nationalised monopoly carrier
operating a vertically
integrated ‘service provider’
business model
44. Brazil
Local connectivity and access
throughout every nation
provided by a single, formerly
nationalised monopoly carrier
operating a vertically
integrated ‘service provider’
business model
45. POLITICAL DRIVE FOR PRIVATISATION, COMPETITION & REGULATION
BRIGHTON
FOLKSTONE
PORTSMOUTH
GLOUCESTER
HULL
TUNBRIDGE
GLASGOW WELLS
SWANSEA
BRIGHTON
BRISTOL
THE DISRUPTIVE DIGITAL
TECHNOLOGIES SHOULD HAVE
BEEN LET LOOSE AT THE
LOCALNET LEVEL AND NOT
‘GIVEN’ EXCLUSIVELY TO THE
TELECOMS SECTOR TO DEPLOY
46. POLITICAL DRIVE FOR PRIVATISATION, COMPETITION & REGULATION
…collision between disruptive technologies
and state anointed privatised monopolies
WHAM! appoint consultants
WE, How should these to
the regulator need
to consult all the
addresstechnologies
new this to avoid
be deployed to
‘market failure’ ‘stakeholders’
benefit everyone?
silicon chip
198
1984
silicate glass fibre
Telecoms
‘stakeholders’
“ … the route to the future
is with us – you can rely on us to
deploy the new technologies”
spread spectrum
VESTED INTERESTS HANDED POWER BY THE STATE TO TAME
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY AGAINST „OUR‟ INTERESTS
47. Imagine… England 1759
…if the French can build the
Canal du Midi – why don’t
I build a canal to carry coal from
my coal mines to Manchester
to where all my mill
customers are?
Francis Egerton
3rd Duke of Bridgewater
48. 1785 ….. 1825
4,500 miles of canal
… but imagine if this vital sector had been regulated as today
49. 1829
… not to be confused with
OFCOM
Office of Canal Operations & Management
51. ‘APPARENT’ BENEFITS FOR EVERYONE
• faster movement of coal and other materials
• greater utilization of canal capacity
• minimised public risk through licensed regulatory regime
• birth of a new engine manufacturing industry
• massive growth of steel and rail output
• last but not least … “happy horses”
52. What actually happened?
THE CANAL INDUSTRY
Declined and was dormant within 20 years
DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY
+
FREE MARKET OF END USERS
=
SECTOR SPECIFIC REGULATION
=
GOLDEN AGE OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC
PROSPERITY
53. GOLDEN AGE OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC PROSPERITY
A historical perspective on
the five previous „industrial
revolutions‟ created by
disruptive technological
innovation
Carlota Pérez
54. FIVE TECHNOLOGICAL REVOLUTIONS IN 200 YEARS
Carlota Pérez
THE AGE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
1971
THE AGE OF OIL, THE AUTOMOBILE, PETROCHEMICALS AND MASS PRODUCTION
1908
THE AGE OF STEEL ELECTRICITY AND HEAVY ENGINEERING
1875
THE AGE OF RAILWAYS, COAL AND THE STEAM ENGINE
1829
THE “INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION” IN ENGLAND
1771
55. EACH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION IS UNDERPINNED
BY NEW INFRASTRUCTURECarlota Pérez
GLOBAL DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS
THE AGE OF
AND
1971
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
ICT SUPPORT NETWORKS
THE AGE OF OIL, THE AUTOMOBILE,
ELECTRICITY, TELEPHONE,
PETROCHEMICALS
1908 HIGHWAYS AND AIRWAYS
AND MASS PRODUCTION
THE AGE OF STEEL ELECTRICITY TRANSCONTINENTAL COMMUNICATIONS,
1875
AND HEAVY ENGINEERING STEAMSHIPS, RAILWAYS AND TELEGRAPH
THE AGE OF RAILWAYS, RAILWAYS, PENNY POST
1829
COAL AND THE STEAM ENGINE AND TELEGRAPH
THE “INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION” CANALS, TURNPIKE ROADS
1771
IN ENGLAND AND MAIL COACHES
56. EACH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION IS UNDERPINNED
BY NEW INFRASTRUCTURECarlota Pérez
“In no previous „industrial GLOBAL DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AND
1971
revolution‟, has the ICT SUPPORT NETWORKS
infrastructural network of the ELECTRICITY, TELEPHONE,
1908 HIGHWAYS AND AIRWAYS
„revolution‟ that succeeds it,
ever been delivered by, or TRANSCONTINENTAL COMMUNICATIONS,
1875 STEAMSHIPS, RAILWAYS AND TELEGRAPH
evolved from, those
responsible for the RAILWAYS, PENNY POST
1829 AND TELEGRAPH
infrastructural network of the
prevailing age” Matson CANALS, TURNPIKE ROADS
1771 AND MAIL COACHES
…SO WHAT WAS THE PHILOSOPHICAL, POLITICAL OR
ECONOMIC RATIONALE FOR REGULATING TO DO JUST
1984 WITH THE CURRENT ICT REVOLUTION ?
THIS IN
57. … and the result ?
APPARENT BENEFITS FOR EVERYONE
• „always on‟ connectivity to the internet
• faster „download‟ speeds
• increased ISP competition
• lower end user costs
• increased usage and household penetration
ADSL
Unbundled ADSL is NOT a ‘Golden Age’ creating
deployment of disruptive digital technologies
58. POLITICAL DRIVE FOR PRIVATISATION, COMPETITION & REGULATION
PUBLIC POLICY FORMULATION THROUGH
silicon chip
CONSULTATION OF
SELF-APPOINTED STAKEHOLDERS
INHIBITS PROGRESS AND WORKS AGAINST
silicate glass fibre
INNOVATION AND THE INTERESTS OF
THE END USER, CITIZENS AND SOCIETY
spread spectrum
59. POLITICAL DRIVE FOR PRIVATISATION,
COMPETITION & REGULATION
MARKET DEPLOYMENT & TAKE-OFF
FOR THE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
60. MARKET DEPLOYMENT TAKE-OFF FOR THE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
WHAT?
WHERE?
silicon chip
silicate glass fibre
WHO?
HOW?
spread spectrum
61. END USER
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
“dumb” CPE
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
+
dedicated
network
capacity
Trunk / International
NETWORK
embedded
“intelligence”
+
scarce
capacity
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
62. PTO LOCAL
EXCHANGE
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
Trunk / International
Optical Fibre
Optical Fibre
PTO LOCAL PTO LOCAL
EXCHANGE EXCHANGE
63. PTO LOCAL
EXCHANGE
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
Digital Digital
Computer Computer
Trunk / International
Digital
Optical Fibre
Computer
Optical Fibre
PTO LOCAL PTO LOCAL
EXCHANGE EXCHANGE
Digital
Digital
Computer
Computer
64. Ken Olsen, CEO Digital
Equipment Corporation
“There is no reason for any individual to
have a computer in their home.”
65. Digital Digital Digital Digital
Computer Computer Computer Computer
PTO LOCAL
EXCHANGE
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
Digital Digital
Computer Computer
Digital
Digital Digital Digital
Computer
Computer Computer Computer
Trunk / International
Digital
Optical Fibre
Computer
Optical Fibre
Digital Digital
Digital Digital
Computer Computer
Computer Computer
PTO LOCAL PTO LOCAL
EXCHANGE EXCHANGE
Digital
Digital
Computer
Computer
Digital Digital
Digital
Computer Computer
Computer
66. Digital Digital Digital Digital
Computer Computer Computer Computer
END USER PTO LOCAL
EXCHANGE
PTO LOCAL EXCHANGE
Digital Digital
Intelligent CPE
Computer Computer
+
restricted
Network
Digital
Digital Digital Digital
capacity
Computer
Computer Computer Computer
Trunk / International
Digital
Optical Fibre
Computer
Optical Fibre
NETWORK
„dumb‟ routers
+
Digital Digital
Digital Digital
abundant
Computer Computer
Computer Computer
network
capacity
PTO LOCAL PTO LOCAL
EXCHANGE EXCHANGE
Digital
Digital
Computer
Computer
Digital Digital
Digital
Computer Computer
Computer
67.
68. 2009 LOCALNET
SP SP
∞ SP 2 3 SP
Scarce
Intelligent
Dumb CPE Capacity ‘n’
Capacity 1
CPE
PTT
Intelligence
‘Dumb’
in Xchange
Routers
NETWORK CAPTIVE
NO LOCAL P2P CONNECTIVITY
ASSYMETRICAL TOPOGRAPHY
The world has been turned upside down
PRIMARY VALUE CAPTURED BY TELCO
‘ACTIVE’, CLOSED, METERED PIPES
69. Open Public Local Access Network OPLAN
Carrier
Beyond the
1
OPLAN –
including the
PTT
Internet
Wireless
Node
Wireless
Wireless
Node Wireless
ISP Node Wireless
Node
2 Node
ISP Beyond the
Wireless Wireless Wireless
1 OPLAN –
Wireless
Beyond the including the
Node Node Node
Node
OPLAN – Internet
including the
Internet
Wireless
Wireless
Wireless Node
Node
Node
Beyond the Carrier
OPLAN – 2
including the
Internet
70. THE MOTHER OF ALL DIGITAL BATTLES
v „our‟
telco/cable
computers devices
Digital Digital
Computer Computer
THE ‘DO’or ‘DIE ISSUES:
Digital
1. Who will „control‟ local
Computer
connectivity?
TELCO/CABLECO or
CITIZENS
Digital Digital
2. Will OURdevices remain free to
Computer Computer
communicate directly with each
other and not just via the
LOCAL
TELCOs?
NOW running
in a city
COMMUNITY
near you!
INTERNET
or NETWORK CAPTIVE ?
NETWORK NEUTRALITY ?
71. THE MOTHER OF ALL DIGITAL BATTLES
v „our‟
telco/cable
computers devices
Digital Digital
Computer Computer
THE ‘DO’or ‘DIE ISSUES:
Will we be able to have
Digital
1. Who will „control‟ local
Computer
CONVERSATION
connectivity?
TELCO/CABLECO or
with anyone other than a toll-
CITIZENS
Digital Digital
extracting, content controlling
2. Will OURdevices remain free to
Computer Computer
communicate or cableco?
telco directly with each
other and not just via the
LOCAL
TELCOs?
NOW running
in a city
COMMUNITY
near you!
INTERNET
or NETWORK CAPTIVE ?
NETWORK NEUTRALITY ?
72. Give a man a fish and
you feed him for a day…
teach him how to fish and you
feed him for a lifetime
73. Give a man a fish and
you feed him for a day…
teach him how to fish and you
ruin a great business opportunity
74. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
ME
HOW?
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
MY VILLAGE,
TOWN OR CITY
THE INTERNET
… WORLD
BEYOND
to move from this …
NETWORK
NETWORK NEUTRALITY NETWORK NEUTRALITY
BIAS
75. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
ME
HOW?
MY HOME &
WORKPLACE
MY VILLAGE,
TOWN OR CITY
THE INTERNET
… WORLD
BEYOND
… to this
NETWORK NEUTRALITY
76. THE BLIND PERPETUATION BY INCUMBENT TELCOS AND CABLECOS OF THE
VERTICALLY INTEGRATED SERVICE PROVIDER BUSINESS MODEL
IS WRECKLESSLY DESTROYING SHAREHOLDER VALUE
APPLICATION / CONTENT
SERVICE PROVISION
+
NETWORK
OPERATIONS
+
NETWORK
INFRASTRUCTURE
Telcos /ISPs Cable
77. THE BLIND PERPETUATION BY INCUMBENT TELCOS AND CABLECOS OF THE
VERTICALLY INTEGRATED SERVICE PROVIDER BUSINESS MODEL
IS WRECKLESSLY DESTROYING SHAREHOLDER VALUE
£ £
RISK / RETURNS
INVESTMENT
APPLICATION / CONTENT
SERVICE PROVISION
+
NETWORK
OPERATIONS
+
NETWORK
INFRASTRUCTURE
78. THE BLIND PERPETUATION BY INCUMBENT TELCOS AND CABLECOS OF THE
VERTICALLY INTEGRATED SERVICE PROVIDER BUSINESS MODEL
IS WRECKLESSLY DESTROYING SHAREHOLDER VALUE
Technology Free Market Entry Barriers Global
Life Cycle Competition & Costs Reach
APPLICATION / CONTENT months infinite none high
SERVICE PROVISION
+
NETWORK years
few moderate moderate
(2-3)
OPERATIONS
+
NETWORK decades one per
high none
(25yr) location
INFRASTRUCTURE
79. THREE NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT COMPONENTS
LOCAL POLITICAL
VISION AND
COMMITMENT
DEVELOPMENT
PARTNER WITH A THE LOCAL TELCO
SOUND STRATEGIC
INCUMBENT AS A
OPEN ACCESS
PLAN & TRACK PARTNER
RECORD
OPLAN
80. THREE NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT COMPONENTS
LOCAL POLITICAL
VISION AND
COMMITMENT
DEVELOPMENT
PARTNER WITH A THE LOCAL TELCO
SOUND STRATEGIC
INCUMBENT AS A
OPEN ACCESS
PLAN & TRACK PARTNER
RECORD
OPLAN
81. A new generation of enlightened and visionary
local political leaders are beginning to ask …
“What if mycity and local economycould have an
OPLAN which would not only save massive cost
BUT deliver better local P2P connectivity, so our
community can do things differently and better
so as to outperform other cities?”
CONVERSATION
82. A new generation of enlightened and visionary
local political leaders are beginning to ask …
APPLICATION / CONTENT
CONVERSATION
SERVICE PROVISION
+
NETWORK
OPERATIONS
+
Open
NETWORK
INFRASTRUCTURE
Access
Telcos /ISPs Cable
83. A new generation of enlightened and visionary
local political leaders are beginning to ask …
APPLICATION / CONTENT
CONVERSATION
SERVICE PROVISION
+
NETWORK
OPERATIONS
“The last thing we ought+ do is let a third party buy
to
Open
it all, own and control it and then offer us a ‘service’
NETWORK
INFRASTRUCTURE
based on charging us as much as it can for using
Access
Telcos– but only in a manner which they dictate”
it /ISPs Cable
84. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
Amsterdam Deputy-Mayor
Mark van der Horst
“…. we make a big step towards the
deployment of a citywide fiber-to-the-home
network. This enables our city to compete with
other European cities. The fiber network
delivers to Amsterdam an innovative and freely
accessible openinfrastructure, suitable to
support growth in demand for the next 30 years
or more. In this way we ensure a wide open
marketplace for innovative service-providers
and economic growth, as well as a fast track for
the smarter and cheaper delivery of care,
education and other public services.”
City of Amsterdam Press Release, November 3 2005
85. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
Eindhoven Mayor
Alexander Sakkers
“In 2004 the Dutch government gave to the
Eindhoven Region/Southeast Brabant, the
title of BRAINPORT because the economic
identity of our region is defined by high-
tech research and development and
production activities. We believe that the
development of an open public local
access network to serve the community is
vital to it remaining globally competitive in
the 21st century knowledge economy”
86. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
Panayiotis Tzanikos
Former Mayor
Municipality of Amaroussion
Athens , Greece
“We feel that we are entering a period when
towns and regions will compete with each other
and one of the key parameters in the
competitiveness of the city is
telecommunications. … I think that the level of
what we are getting [from the conventional
telecommunications sector] is not enough to
equip the city for the next generation which is
coming….. we feel that the way they [the
telecoms operators] operate they keep the
citizens, the businesses, the social groups,
outside of the new era which is arriving so they
do not have the motive to use the network to
make new things, new creations and services.”
OpenPlanet interview October 2005
“
87. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
Councillor John Robinson
Hull City Council
United Kingdom
“It is essential that the city of Hull has an open
public local access network if it is to solve its
social and economic problems resulting from
older industries like fishing being replaced by
the knowledge economy. We need to compete
with other cities in attracting inward investment
and ensuring that those who live and work in
and around Hull enjoy the highest level of public
services – which must be underpinned by an
open access 4th utility.”
OpenPlanet interview October 2008
“
88. THREE NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT COMPONENTS
LOCAL POLITICAL
VISION AND
COMMITMENT
DEVELOPMENT
PARTNER WITH A THE LOCAL TELCO
SOUND STRATEGIC
INCUMBENT AS A
OPEN ACCESS
PLAN & TRACK PARTNER
RECORD
OPLAN
89. TWO ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO AN OPLAN
BUILD „OVERLAY‟ FIBRE OPLAN NETWORK
1.
The current favoured option
BUT
• fierce opposition from telecom incumbent which is proving powerful
• results in local economy „financing‟ two networks : lowers global competitiveness
• low penetration (50% or <) means lower utility value : esp. to public sector
• most expensive solution due to civil engineering costs (25% of total CAPEX)
90. TWO ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO AN OPLAN
„CONVERT & UPGRADE‟ EXISTING LOCAL INCUMBENT NETWORK
2.
• would deliver near ubiquitous local penetration and assure local P2P connectivity
• avoids wasteful duplication and over-capacity
• massive (25%) CAPEX saving and minimise local civil engineering disruption
BUT
• these national carriers have no appetite to abandon the vertically integrated
business model (INFRASTRUCTURE + OPERATION + SERVICES) which seeks to
„capture‟ maximum end-user service/application/content expenditure
• due to earlier nationalisation, the privatised local incumbent is almost always a
national carrier
91. ONLY FIVE CITIES IN THE WORLD WITH A
DEDICATED TELECOMS INCUMBENT
92. CONVERSATION - within the context of COMMUNITY
In one of these cities, Malcolm Matson has been
active over a number of years in generating local
political and community stakeholder
understanding and support for creating a not-for-
profit SPV which will acquire the local incumbent
in order to restructure it around the OPLAN
business model. This will involve divesting all
service provision activities in order to focus on
owning and managing this local 4th utility
infrastructure so as to ensure that the long term
value and benefit rests with those using it and
not some absent owner hoping to rent seek
within the arbitrary limits set by a sector-specific
„regulator.
This exemplar project will not only bring untold socio-economic benefit to
the city concerned, which will trigger the pressure for emulation in other
cities, but it will also demonstrate to shareholders in existing local exchange
carriers, that value is to be realised by embracing rather than resisting the
relentless march towards vertical desegregation and open access.
93. OPLAN… Open Public Local AccessNetwork
is a network of truly „broadband‟ capacity - i.e. where the bandwidth capacity is dictated by nothing
other than physical characteristics of the deployed technologies (neutral)
dedicated to serving a local geographic community - ranging from a street or business park to an
entire town or city
provides abundant low cost access to connectivity on an „end-to-end‟ and symmetrical basis
throughout that community
is a „public utility‟ in that it is available for use (on equal terms) by any party located within the
community it serves: public and private, business and residential
affords global connectivity (inc. to the internet) through offering „open access‟ to competing third-
party carriers/service providers
does not differentiate between „content creators‟ and „content consumers‟ and their „bits‟
provides infrastructure which is open to all and is owned and controlled independently of any
service or content which uses it
is structured, financially and legally, and configured with management and governance measures
which serve the ‟common good‟ and assures the primary short and long term „value and benefit‟
rests locally with users
end-user „access‟ charges are broadly based on servicing capital and maintenance cost-recovery
is primarily funded by and managed by the private sector and market driven - not a backdoor to re-
nationalisation
(OPLAN white paper at www.oplan.org )
94. You are invited to
collaborate and
contribute
to the first local
incumbent exchange
carrier
in the world to opt for
95. CONVERSATION
WALTER LIPPMANN 1889-1974
Influential US writer, journalist, and political commentator
“ The role of a press is to keep a community in
conversation with itself ”
96. CONVERSATION
MALCOLM MATSON 2009
Disruptive technologist and entrepreneur
“ In the digital age, the role of an OPLAN
is to keep a community in conversation with itself ”
97. THE BATTLE TO WIN
LOCAL NET NEUTRALITY
Malcolm J. Matson
malcolm.matson@oplan.org