The document is a validation test report from TASER International testing the impact of an RFID scanner on the operation of the TASER X26 conducted over two days in July 2015. Ten X26 devices from different years of manufacture were tested in various configurations including safe mode, armed mode active and not active, and during time synchronization and download, with RFID tags attached. The testing found no negative impacts on the X26 devices from the scanner except for a slight decrease in tag reads during active shots. The report was written by Josh Jones and signed off by technical and compliance managers.

1. TASER
Validation Test Report
VTR_X26_RFID-Scanner_JULY2015_v1.0.docx Saved July 28, 2015 Page 1 of 9
This document contains proprietary and confidential information and may not be distributed to others in any form without written
authorization from TASER International, USA.
TASER X26 CEW with P101 RF ID Scanner
VALIDATION TEST REPORT
Written By: Josh Jones Date: July 28, 2015

2. TASER
Validation Test Report
VTR_X26_RFID-Scanner_JULY2015_v1.0.docx Saved July 28, 2015 Page 2 of 9
This document contains proprietary and confidential information and may not be distributed to others in any form without written
authorization from TASER International, USA.
DOCUMENT SIGNOFF
This report is approved for release by the following;
Name Signature
Josh Jones
Validation Test Technician
Bryan Chiles
Technical Compliance Manager
This document was designed for on-line viewing. Authentic versions of the document will
contain digital signatures.
jjones@taser.com
Digitally signed by jjones@taser.com
DN: cn=jjones@taser.com
Date: 2015.07.28 15:11:44 -07'00'
bchiles@taser.com
Digitally signed by
bchiles@taser.com
DN: cn=bchiles@taser.com
Date: 2015.07.28 15:29:39 -07'00'

3. TASER
Validation Test Report
VTR_X26_RFID-Scanner_JULY2015_v1.0.docx Saved July 28, 2015 Page 3 of 9
This document contains proprietary and confidential information and may not be distributed to others in any form without written
authorization from TASER International, USA.
REVISION HISTORY
Date Name Description Version
22-JUL-2015 J. Jones First draft 0.1
28-JUL-2015 B. Chiles Review- minor edits 0.2
28-JUL-2015 J. Jones Final draft, release 1.0

4. TASER
Validation Test Report
VTR_X26_RFID-Scanner_JULY2015_v1.0.docx Saved July 28, 2015 Page 4 of 9
This document contains proprietary and confidential information and may not be distributed to others in any form without written
authorization from TASER International, USA.
Test Report
TESTED BY: Josh Jones
DATE(S): 21-22 JULY 2015
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this test was to determine if a Tagsys P101 RFID reader will have any
negative impact on the X26 CEW operation or logging.
EQUIPMENT USED:
1 – Tagsys Medio P101 Ethernet Reader
1 – PC with Tagsys Px Explorer Software
1 – PC with EVIDENCE Sync Software
4 – Bare Tagsys RFID tags
10 – TASER X26 CEWs (DOM range of 2004 to 2014)
PASSING CRITERIA:
There will be no negative impact on the X26 CEW operation or logs when subjected to the
RFID scanner reads.
TEST SUMMARY:
10 samples X26 CEWs were selected for this test, each running version 24 of the X26
firmware. The following X26 samples were selected for the test;
Serial Number Date of Manufacture (DOM)
X00-078230 2004
X00-353534 2007
X00-390640 2008
X00-432861 May 12, 2009
X00-476435 2009
XCE-003409 September 29, 2009
X00-534143 January 20, 2010
X00-602202 December 14, 2010
X00-758136 July 19, 2014
X00-758151 July 29, 2014
Testing was conducted with the X26 CEW in different configurations, with the Medio P101
Reader connected to a PC with Px Explorer software running and actively scanning. The X26
CEWs each had all 4 of the supplied RFID tags attached in the label pocket via tape for each
test (see Figures 1-7). One of each tag type was applied with the reverse side facing out. The
CEWs were tested in the following configurations;

5. TASER
Validation Test Report
VTR_X26_RFID-Scanner_JULY2015_v1.0.docx Saved July 28, 2015 Page 5 of 9
This document contains proprietary and confidential information and may not be distributed to others in any form without written
authorization from TASER International, USA.
1. Safe Mode
Each X26 CEW was placed in Safe mode, then on the scanner on all 6 sides, while observing
for any effect from the scanner.
No negative effect from the scanner was observed on any of the samples. The scanner was
functional during the testing. The CEW was downloaded after the test and the logs were
reviewed. No anomalies were observed in the logs.
2. Armed Mode, Not active
Each X26 CEW was armed with the laser and flashlights active, but the high voltage not
triggered. Then the CEW was placed on the scanner on all 6 sides, while observing for any
effect from the scanner.
No negative effect from the scanner was observed on any of the samples. The scanner was
functional during the testing. The CEW was downloaded after the test and the logs were
reviewed. No anomalies were observed in the logs.
3. Armed Mode, Active
Each X26 CEW was armed with the laser and flashlights active, then the trigger was pulled
while the CEW was placed on the scanner on 5 sides (electrodes touching the scanner was
not tested, as that may damage the scanner), while observing for any negative effect from the
scanner.
No negative effect from the scanner was observed on any of the samples. The scanner
appeared to miss some readings while the X26 CEW was actively arcing, however the
scanner continued to read the tags and resumed its normal reads per second when the CEW
stopped arcing. The CEW was downloaded after the test and the logs were reviewed. No
anomalies were observed in the logs.
4. Time Synchronization and Download
Each X26 CEW was place in Safe mode, then a USB pack was inserted. Each sample was
placed on the scanner on the side with the RFID tag opposite of the scanner. While actively
scanning, each sample X26 CEW was connected via USB to a computer with EVIDENCE
Sync software to initiate a time synchronization and CEW download.
No negative effect from the scanner was observed on any of the samples. The scanner was
functional during the testing. The CEW downloaded successfully in each test and the logs
were reviewed for a proper time synchronization and accuracy. The time synchronization on
each sample was successful. No anomalies were observed in the logs.
CONCLUSION:
Of 10 X26 CEW samples testing in the 4 configurations, there were no negative effects
observed on any of the CEW samples. A slight decrease in the number of RFID tag reads per
second was observed while the CEWs were actively arcing. No other negative observations
were made.

6. TASER
Validation Test Report
VTR_X26_RFID-Scanner_JULY2015_v1.0.docx Saved July 28, 2015 Page 6 of 9
This document contains proprietary and confidential information and may not be distributed to others in any form without written
authorization from TASER International, USA.
FIGURES:
Figure 1 – MEDIO P101 Ethernet label
Figure 2 – RFID Tag orientations

7. TASER
Validation Test Report
VTR_X26_RFID-Scanner_JULY2015_v1.0.docx Saved July 28, 2015 Page 7 of 9
This document contains proprietary and confidential information and may not be distributed to others in any form without written
authorization from TASER International, USA.
Figure 3 – RFID Tag placement
Figure 4 – Safe Mode

8. TASER
Validation Test Report
VTR_X26_RFID-Scanner_JULY2015_v1.0.docx Saved July 28, 2015 Page 8 of 9
This document contains proprietary and confidential information and may not be distributed to others in any form without written
authorization from TASER International, USA.
Figure 5 – Armed Mode, Not Active
Figure 6 – Armed Mode, HV Active

9. TASER
Validation Test Report
VTR_X26_RFID-Scanner_JULY2015_v1.0.docx Saved July 28, 2015 Page 9 of 9
This document contains proprietary and confidential information and may not be distributed to others in any form without written
authorization from TASER International, USA.
Figure 7 – Time Synchronization & Download
END OF REPORT