SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
Download to read offline
SERC	
  M&S:	
  Examples
(Screening,	
  Enrollment,	
  Randomization,	
  Completion	
  
Modeling	
  &	
  Simulation)
Dennis	
  Sweitzer,	
  Ph.D.
April	
  2016
Application	
  Scopes
A	
  priori	
  Assumptions	
  ⟶ Simulate⟶ Expected	
  Outcomes,	
  Thresholds
(	
  e.g.,	
  planned	
  timeline,	
  resources,	
  and	
  expected	
  variability)
Ongoing	
  study⟶ Model⟶ Simulate⟶ Projections
(	
  e.g.,	
  projected	
  timeline,	
  resources,	
  and	
  expected	
  variability	
  given	
  real	
  information)
Projections	
   v. A	
  priori	
  Assumptions	
   ⟶Validation	
  (Consistency)
(	
  e.g.,	
  are	
  projections	
  from	
  incoming	
  data	
  consistent	
  with	
  assumptions)
Projections	
  	
  v. Observations	
   ⟶Validation	
  (Reality)
(	
  e.g.,	
  do	
  projections	
  from	
  incoming	
  data	
  match	
  planning	
  expectations)	
  
Model	
  +	
  Scenarios ⟶ Simulate	
  ⟶ Alterative	
  Projections
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Using	
  patient	
  milestone	
  dates	
  (blinded)
(SERC	
  ≣ Screening,	
  Enrollment,	
  Randomization,	
  Discontinuation)
And/or	
  Assumptions	
  used	
  in	
  planning
Simple	
  Modeling	
  &	
  Simulation	
  can	
  be	
  used:
Modeling:	
  Survival	
  analysis	
  of	
  time	
  between	
  events
Simulation:	
  Competing	
  Events	
  model	
  using	
  survival	
  results
Examples	
  ⟹
Example:	
  Multi-­‐Segment	
  Studies
Study Flowchart
Randomized Treatment
Phase
28 to 104 weeks
Screening
&
Enrollment
Open-Label Treatment
Phase
12 to 36 weeks Active
Placebo
Inclusion/Exclusion
Criteria
Inclusion/Exclusion
Criteria
Screen
Failure
Drop
Outs
Drop
Outs
• Long	
  term	
  randomized	
  withdrawal	
  maintenance	
  studies	
  (AstraZeneca)
• Open	
  Label	
  Stabilization	
  (3-­‐9mo)	
  +	
  Follow	
  to	
  Relapse	
  (1-­‐2yr)
• Standard	
  design,	
  but	
  not	
  in	
  Schizophrenia,	
  bipolar,	
  &	
  other	
  mood
– ⟶ Uncertain	
  dropout,	
  relapse,	
  	
  &	
  response	
  rates
• Risks	
  of	
  enrolling
– Too	
  few	
  (subjects	
  dropout	
  before	
  relapse)⟶ Failed	
  Study
– Too	
  many	
  (subjects	
  in	
  Open	
  Label	
  at	
  last	
  relapse)⟶ Costs,	
  Ethics
Competing	
  Events	
  Model
1. Best	
  guess	
  for	
  initial	
  planning
2. As	
  study	
  was	
  running,	
  every	
  month:
• Update	
  Statistical	
  Model	
  using	
  patient	
  status	
  data
• Simulate	
  remainder	
  of	
  study	
  from	
  model
3. Summarize	
  Simulations	
  to:
• Predict	
  milestones	
  (timelines,	
  resources)
• Test	
  scenarios	
  (of	
  changes	
  in	
  plans)
• Validate	
  study	
  assumptions	
  &	
  detect	
  deviations	
  
Enroll OL Pts
OL
Dropouts
Relapse
Rand’d
Patients
Rand’d
Dropouts
M&S	
  ProjectionTrial B, Dates of 200th Event Predicted on 29 Oct
by Enrollment Cutoff
12-Feb-06
23-May-06
31-Aug-06
9-Dec-06
19-Mar-07
27-Jun-07
5-Oct-07
13-Jan-08
22-Apr-08
31-Jul-08
10-Sep-0524-Sep-058-O
ct-0522-O
ct-055-Nov-0519-N
ov-053-Dec-05
17-D
ec-0531-D
ec-0514-Jan-0628-Jan-0611-Feb-0625-Feb-0611-M
ar-0625-M
ar-068-Apr-0622-Apr-066-M
ay-06
20-M
ay-06
Enrollment Cutoffs
Region Based Simulation Actual
Projected	
  End	
  of	
  Study,	
  IF…	
  
…	
  Enrollment	
  ends	
  on	
  this	
  date
Reduced	
  costs:	
  stop	
  enrollment	
  on	
  3	
  Dec	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  Reduced	
  Risks:	
  stop	
  by	
  11	
  March
Maintenance	
  Studies	
  in	
  2005
Trial A, Predicted Dates of 200th Event
22-Feb-06
8-Mar-06
22-Mar-06
5-Apr-06
19-Apr-06
3-May-06
17-May-06
31-May-06
14-Jun-06
28-Jun-06
12-Jul-06
26-Jul-06
9-Aug-06
23-Aug-06
6-Sep-06
20-Sep-06
4-Oct-06
9-O
ct-05
23-O
ct-05
6-N
ov-05
20-N
ov-05
4-D
ec-05
18-D
ec-05
1-Jan-06
15-Jan-06
29-Jan-06
12-Feb-06
26-Feb-06
12-M
ar-06
26-M
ar-06
9-Apr-06
23-Apr-06
Date of Prediction (Oct 1 Enrollment Cutoff)
PredictedDateof200thEvent
Region Based Model (Median) Trial Based Actual
Stop	
  enrolling Stop	
  Randomizing
Wait as	
  Patients	
  
Relapse	
  or	
  
Drop	
  out
Another	
  Case	
  Study
Management	
  feedback:
“…  the  simulations  are  very  valuable  and  the  only  
way  we  have  to  plan  our  timelines.  As  it  has  
turned  out,  your  simulations  seems  to  be  pretty  
accurate  ...”
...    We would have been guessing and  spinning  
our wheels without them.”
Date # Randomized Relapses	
  /	
  Dropouts Prediction:
101st Relapse
3 Aug’06 73 3	
  /	
  2 1	
  Dec …	
  15	
  June
6	
  Sep’06 182 16 /	
  7 12	
  Nov	
  …	
  21	
  Feb
2	
  Oct’06	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  Stopped	
  Enrolling	
  Patients	
  	
  	
  	
  (NB:	
  3-­‐4	
  month	
  open	
  label)	
  
Dec‘06	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  Stopped	
  Randomizing	
  Patients	
  (All	
  eligible	
  or	
  discontinued)
1	
  Jan’07	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  101st Relapse	
  Event
Examples
Validation: Protocols A&B assumed: (50% randomized, 30% Relapse) rate
Models estimated: Trial A: (33%, 37%) Trial B: (55%, 41%)
Early	
  Issue	
  Identification	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  ⟶ Quick	
  Corrections
Scenario:	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
   ¿Add Sites to compensate for low enrollment?
• Run	
  simulation	
  with	
  additional	
  sites
• Compare	
  between	
  simulations
Scenario:	
   EMEA	
  requested	
  secondary	
  endpoint	
  of	
  Late	
  Relapses	
  (>4wk	
  off	
  Tx),	
  Trial	
  
A	
  had	
  stopped	
  enrolling.	
  Should	
  Trial	
  A	
  be	
  reopened?	
  Should	
  Trial	
  B	
  be	
  extended?
• Build	
  new	
  endpoint	
  into	
  simulations
• Report
More	
  
A	
  presentation	
  I	
  gave	
  at	
  JSM	
  2006	
  on	
  the	
  method,	
  with	
  a	
  proceedings	
  paper.	
  
https://sites.google.com/site/dennissweitzer/home/modeling-­‐multiphase-­‐clinical-­‐trials-­‐time-­‐to-­‐completion-­‐
study-­‐management
Simple	
  simulation	
  methods	
  using	
  Excel.	
  I’ve	
  long	
  used	
  Excel	
  simulations	
  to	
  aid	
  in	
  
planning	
  clinical	
  trials	
  (for	
  quick	
  &	
  transparent	
  models),	
  although	
  methods	
  for	
  doing	
  
so	
  are	
  not	
  well	
  publicized.	
  Here’s	
  a	
  presentation	
  of	
  how-­‐to:
https://sites.google.com/site/dennissweitzer/home/quick-­‐simple-­‐simulation-­‐using-­‐ms-­‐excel

More Related Content

Similar to DSweitzer,SERC,StudySimulations,2016jul

Qm0021 statistical process control
Qm0021 statistical process controlQm0021 statistical process control
Qm0021 statistical process controlsmumbahelp
 
Monte Carlo Schedule Risk Analysis
Monte Carlo Schedule Risk AnalysisMonte Carlo Schedule Risk Analysis
Monte Carlo Schedule Risk AnalysisIntaver Insititute
 
Presentation of Project and Critique.pptx
Presentation of Project and Critique.pptxPresentation of Project and Critique.pptx
Presentation of Project and Critique.pptxBillyMoses1
 
Andrii Belas: A/B testing overview: use-cases, theory and tools
Andrii Belas: A/B testing overview: use-cases, theory and toolsAndrii Belas: A/B testing overview: use-cases, theory and tools
Andrii Belas: A/B testing overview: use-cases, theory and toolsLviv Startup Club
 
Statistical Learning and Model Selection (1).pptx
Statistical Learning and Model Selection (1).pptxStatistical Learning and Model Selection (1).pptx
Statistical Learning and Model Selection (1).pptxrajalakshmi5921
 
Colloque IMT - 15/10/2019 - Healthcare 4.0 – « Pilotage intelligent du servic...
Colloque IMT - 15/10/2019 - Healthcare 4.0 – « Pilotage intelligent du servic...Colloque IMT - 15/10/2019 - Healthcare 4.0 – « Pilotage intelligent du servic...
Colloque IMT - 15/10/2019 - Healthcare 4.0 – « Pilotage intelligent du servic...I MT
 
Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Physical Systems. (An Inroduction)
Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Physical Systems. (An Inroduction)Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Physical Systems. (An Inroduction)
Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Physical Systems. (An Inroduction)Ogechi Onuoha
 
UCD WST February 20 2020
UCD WST February 20 2020UCD WST February 20 2020
UCD WST February 20 2020UCDAgile
 
Statistics for DP Biology IA
Statistics for DP Biology IAStatistics for DP Biology IA
Statistics for DP Biology IAVeronika Garga
 
CONTINUOUS CLINICAL PATHWAYS EVALUATION BY USING AUTOMATIC LEARNING ALGORITHMS
CONTINUOUS CLINICAL PATHWAYS EVALUATION BY USING AUTOMATIC LEARNING ALGORITHMSCONTINUOUS CLINICAL PATHWAYS EVALUATION BY USING AUTOMATIC LEARNING ALGORITHMS
CONTINUOUS CLINICAL PATHWAYS EVALUATION BY USING AUTOMATIC LEARNING ALGORITHMSUniversitat Politècnica de València
 
Why learn Six Sigma, 4,28,15
Why learn Six Sigma, 4,28,15Why learn Six Sigma, 4,28,15
Why learn Six Sigma, 4,28,15James F. McCarthy
 
Risk Event Modeling and Event Chains
Risk Event Modeling and Event ChainsRisk Event Modeling and Event Chains
Risk Event Modeling and Event ChainsIntaver Insititute
 
840 plenary elder_using his laptop
840 plenary elder_using his laptop840 plenary elder_using his laptop
840 plenary elder_using his laptopRising Media, Inc.
 
Introduction to Statistics and Probability:
Introduction to Statistics and Probability:Introduction to Statistics and Probability:
Introduction to Statistics and Probability:Shrihari Shrihari
 
MSPresentation_Spring2011
MSPresentation_Spring2011MSPresentation_Spring2011
MSPresentation_Spring2011Shaun Smith
 
Forecasting Models & Their Applications
Forecasting Models & Their ApplicationsForecasting Models & Their Applications
Forecasting Models & Their ApplicationsMahmudul Hasan
 

Similar to DSweitzer,SERC,StudySimulations,2016jul (20)

Qm0021 statistical process control
Qm0021 statistical process controlQm0021 statistical process control
Qm0021 statistical process control
 
Change Point Analysis
Change Point AnalysisChange Point Analysis
Change Point Analysis
 
Monte Carlo Schedule Risk Analysis
Monte Carlo Schedule Risk AnalysisMonte Carlo Schedule Risk Analysis
Monte Carlo Schedule Risk Analysis
 
Presentation of Project and Critique.pptx
Presentation of Project and Critique.pptxPresentation of Project and Critique.pptx
Presentation of Project and Critique.pptx
 
Andrii Belas: A/B testing overview: use-cases, theory and tools
Andrii Belas: A/B testing overview: use-cases, theory and toolsAndrii Belas: A/B testing overview: use-cases, theory and tools
Andrii Belas: A/B testing overview: use-cases, theory and tools
 
Statistical Learning and Model Selection (1).pptx
Statistical Learning and Model Selection (1).pptxStatistical Learning and Model Selection (1).pptx
Statistical Learning and Model Selection (1).pptx
 
Colloque IMT - 15/10/2019 - Healthcare 4.0 – « Pilotage intelligent du servic...
Colloque IMT - 15/10/2019 - Healthcare 4.0 – « Pilotage intelligent du servic...Colloque IMT - 15/10/2019 - Healthcare 4.0 – « Pilotage intelligent du servic...
Colloque IMT - 15/10/2019 - Healthcare 4.0 – « Pilotage intelligent du servic...
 
Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Physical Systems. (An Inroduction)
Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Physical Systems. (An Inroduction)Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Physical Systems. (An Inroduction)
Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Physical Systems. (An Inroduction)
 
UCD WST February 20 2020
UCD WST February 20 2020UCD WST February 20 2020
UCD WST February 20 2020
 
Lecture1.pdf
Lecture1.pdfLecture1.pdf
Lecture1.pdf
 
Overview of statistical tests: Data handling and data quality (Part II)
Overview of statistical tests: Data handling and data quality (Part II)Overview of statistical tests: Data handling and data quality (Part II)
Overview of statistical tests: Data handling and data quality (Part II)
 
Statistics for DP Biology IA
Statistics for DP Biology IAStatistics for DP Biology IA
Statistics for DP Biology IA
 
CONTINUOUS CLINICAL PATHWAYS EVALUATION BY USING AUTOMATIC LEARNING ALGORITHMS
CONTINUOUS CLINICAL PATHWAYS EVALUATION BY USING AUTOMATIC LEARNING ALGORITHMSCONTINUOUS CLINICAL PATHWAYS EVALUATION BY USING AUTOMATIC LEARNING ALGORITHMS
CONTINUOUS CLINICAL PATHWAYS EVALUATION BY USING AUTOMATIC LEARNING ALGORITHMS
 
Why learn Six Sigma, 4,28,15
Why learn Six Sigma, 4,28,15Why learn Six Sigma, 4,28,15
Why learn Six Sigma, 4,28,15
 
Harmel - Monitoring to Support and Improve H/WQ Modeling
Harmel - Monitoring to Support and Improve H/WQ ModelingHarmel - Monitoring to Support and Improve H/WQ Modeling
Harmel - Monitoring to Support and Improve H/WQ Modeling
 
Risk Event Modeling and Event Chains
Risk Event Modeling and Event ChainsRisk Event Modeling and Event Chains
Risk Event Modeling and Event Chains
 
840 plenary elder_using his laptop
840 plenary elder_using his laptop840 plenary elder_using his laptop
840 plenary elder_using his laptop
 
Introduction to Statistics and Probability:
Introduction to Statistics and Probability:Introduction to Statistics and Probability:
Introduction to Statistics and Probability:
 
MSPresentation_Spring2011
MSPresentation_Spring2011MSPresentation_Spring2011
MSPresentation_Spring2011
 
Forecasting Models & Their Applications
Forecasting Models & Their ApplicationsForecasting Models & Their Applications
Forecasting Models & Their Applications
 

More from Dennis Sweitzer

TolstoyTarget,AnimatedExpl,v5
TolstoyTarget,AnimatedExpl,v5TolstoyTarget,AnimatedExpl,v5
TolstoyTarget,AnimatedExpl,v5Dennis Sweitzer
 
2013jsm,Proceedings,DSweitzer,26sep
2013jsm,Proceedings,DSweitzer,26sep2013jsm,Proceedings,DSweitzer,26sep
2013jsm,Proceedings,DSweitzer,26sepDennis Sweitzer
 
JSM2013,Proceedings,paper307699_79238,DSweitzer
JSM2013,Proceedings,paper307699_79238,DSweitzerJSM2013,Proceedings,paper307699_79238,DSweitzer
JSM2013,Proceedings,paper307699_79238,DSweitzerDennis Sweitzer
 
Jsm2013,598,sweitzer,randomization metrics,v2,aug08
Jsm2013,598,sweitzer,randomization metrics,v2,aug08Jsm2013,598,sweitzer,randomization metrics,v2,aug08
Jsm2013,598,sweitzer,randomization metrics,v2,aug08Dennis Sweitzer
 
Sct2013 boston,randomizationmetricsposter,d6.2
Sct2013 boston,randomizationmetricsposter,d6.2Sct2013 boston,randomizationmetricsposter,d6.2
Sct2013 boston,randomizationmetricsposter,d6.2Dennis Sweitzer
 
Randomization: Too Important to Gamble with.
Randomization: Too Important to Gamble with.Randomization: Too Important to Gamble with.
Randomization: Too Important to Gamble with.Dennis Sweitzer
 
Election Polling & Forecasting 2004
Election Polling & Forecasting 2004Election Polling & Forecasting 2004
Election Polling & Forecasting 2004Dennis Sweitzer
 
Splatter Plots2,Sweitzer,2011dec13
Splatter Plots2,Sweitzer,2011dec13Splatter Plots2,Sweitzer,2011dec13
Splatter Plots2,Sweitzer,2011dec13Dennis Sweitzer
 
Sim Slides,Tricks,Trends,2012jan15
Sim Slides,Tricks,Trends,2012jan15Sim Slides,Tricks,Trends,2012jan15
Sim Slides,Tricks,Trends,2012jan15Dennis Sweitzer
 
Sweitzer,Simulating Multi Phase Studies
Sweitzer,Simulating Multi Phase StudiesSweitzer,Simulating Multi Phase Studies
Sweitzer,Simulating Multi Phase StudiesDennis Sweitzer
 
Jsm Proceedings Sweitzer Trial Term Model V7
Jsm Proceedings Sweitzer Trial Term Model V7Jsm Proceedings Sweitzer Trial Term Model V7
Jsm Proceedings Sweitzer Trial Term Model V7Dennis Sweitzer
 

More from Dennis Sweitzer (11)

TolstoyTarget,AnimatedExpl,v5
TolstoyTarget,AnimatedExpl,v5TolstoyTarget,AnimatedExpl,v5
TolstoyTarget,AnimatedExpl,v5
 
2013jsm,Proceedings,DSweitzer,26sep
2013jsm,Proceedings,DSweitzer,26sep2013jsm,Proceedings,DSweitzer,26sep
2013jsm,Proceedings,DSweitzer,26sep
 
JSM2013,Proceedings,paper307699_79238,DSweitzer
JSM2013,Proceedings,paper307699_79238,DSweitzerJSM2013,Proceedings,paper307699_79238,DSweitzer
JSM2013,Proceedings,paper307699_79238,DSweitzer
 
Jsm2013,598,sweitzer,randomization metrics,v2,aug08
Jsm2013,598,sweitzer,randomization metrics,v2,aug08Jsm2013,598,sweitzer,randomization metrics,v2,aug08
Jsm2013,598,sweitzer,randomization metrics,v2,aug08
 
Sct2013 boston,randomizationmetricsposter,d6.2
Sct2013 boston,randomizationmetricsposter,d6.2Sct2013 boston,randomizationmetricsposter,d6.2
Sct2013 boston,randomizationmetricsposter,d6.2
 
Randomization: Too Important to Gamble with.
Randomization: Too Important to Gamble with.Randomization: Too Important to Gamble with.
Randomization: Too Important to Gamble with.
 
Election Polling & Forecasting 2004
Election Polling & Forecasting 2004Election Polling & Forecasting 2004
Election Polling & Forecasting 2004
 
Splatter Plots2,Sweitzer,2011dec13
Splatter Plots2,Sweitzer,2011dec13Splatter Plots2,Sweitzer,2011dec13
Splatter Plots2,Sweitzer,2011dec13
 
Sim Slides,Tricks,Trends,2012jan15
Sim Slides,Tricks,Trends,2012jan15Sim Slides,Tricks,Trends,2012jan15
Sim Slides,Tricks,Trends,2012jan15
 
Sweitzer,Simulating Multi Phase Studies
Sweitzer,Simulating Multi Phase StudiesSweitzer,Simulating Multi Phase Studies
Sweitzer,Simulating Multi Phase Studies
 
Jsm Proceedings Sweitzer Trial Term Model V7
Jsm Proceedings Sweitzer Trial Term Model V7Jsm Proceedings Sweitzer Trial Term Model V7
Jsm Proceedings Sweitzer Trial Term Model V7
 

DSweitzer,SERC,StudySimulations,2016jul

  • 1. SERC  M&S:  Examples (Screening,  Enrollment,  Randomization,  Completion   Modeling  &  Simulation) Dennis  Sweitzer,  Ph.D. April  2016
  • 2. Application  Scopes A  priori  Assumptions  ⟶ Simulate⟶ Expected  Outcomes,  Thresholds (  e.g.,  planned  timeline,  resources,  and  expected  variability) Ongoing  study⟶ Model⟶ Simulate⟶ Projections (  e.g.,  projected  timeline,  resources,  and  expected  variability  given  real  information) Projections   v. A  priori  Assumptions   ⟶Validation  (Consistency) (  e.g.,  are  projections  from  incoming  data  consistent  with  assumptions) Projections    v. Observations   ⟶Validation  (Reality) (  e.g.,  do  projections  from  incoming  data  match  planning  expectations)   Model  +  Scenarios ⟶ Simulate  ⟶ Alterative  Projections ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Using  patient  milestone  dates  (blinded) (SERC  ≣ Screening,  Enrollment,  Randomization,  Discontinuation) And/or  Assumptions  used  in  planning Simple  Modeling  &  Simulation  can  be  used: Modeling:  Survival  analysis  of  time  between  events Simulation:  Competing  Events  model  using  survival  results Examples  ⟹
  • 3. Example:  Multi-­‐Segment  Studies Study Flowchart Randomized Treatment Phase 28 to 104 weeks Screening & Enrollment Open-Label Treatment Phase 12 to 36 weeks Active Placebo Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Screen Failure Drop Outs Drop Outs • Long  term  randomized  withdrawal  maintenance  studies  (AstraZeneca) • Open  Label  Stabilization  (3-­‐9mo)  +  Follow  to  Relapse  (1-­‐2yr) • Standard  design,  but  not  in  Schizophrenia,  bipolar,  &  other  mood – ⟶ Uncertain  dropout,  relapse,    &  response  rates • Risks  of  enrolling – Too  few  (subjects  dropout  before  relapse)⟶ Failed  Study – Too  many  (subjects  in  Open  Label  at  last  relapse)⟶ Costs,  Ethics
  • 4. Competing  Events  Model 1. Best  guess  for  initial  planning 2. As  study  was  running,  every  month: • Update  Statistical  Model  using  patient  status  data • Simulate  remainder  of  study  from  model 3. Summarize  Simulations  to: • Predict  milestones  (timelines,  resources) • Test  scenarios  (of  changes  in  plans) • Validate  study  assumptions  &  detect  deviations   Enroll OL Pts OL Dropouts Relapse Rand’d Patients Rand’d Dropouts
  • 5. M&S  ProjectionTrial B, Dates of 200th Event Predicted on 29 Oct by Enrollment Cutoff 12-Feb-06 23-May-06 31-Aug-06 9-Dec-06 19-Mar-07 27-Jun-07 5-Oct-07 13-Jan-08 22-Apr-08 31-Jul-08 10-Sep-0524-Sep-058-O ct-0522-O ct-055-Nov-0519-N ov-053-Dec-05 17-D ec-0531-D ec-0514-Jan-0628-Jan-0611-Feb-0625-Feb-0611-M ar-0625-M ar-068-Apr-0622-Apr-066-M ay-06 20-M ay-06 Enrollment Cutoffs Region Based Simulation Actual Projected  End  of  Study,  IF…   …  Enrollment  ends  on  this  date Reduced  costs:  stop  enrollment  on  3  Dec                    Reduced  Risks:  stop  by  11  March
  • 6. Maintenance  Studies  in  2005 Trial A, Predicted Dates of 200th Event 22-Feb-06 8-Mar-06 22-Mar-06 5-Apr-06 19-Apr-06 3-May-06 17-May-06 31-May-06 14-Jun-06 28-Jun-06 12-Jul-06 26-Jul-06 9-Aug-06 23-Aug-06 6-Sep-06 20-Sep-06 4-Oct-06 9-O ct-05 23-O ct-05 6-N ov-05 20-N ov-05 4-D ec-05 18-D ec-05 1-Jan-06 15-Jan-06 29-Jan-06 12-Feb-06 26-Feb-06 12-M ar-06 26-M ar-06 9-Apr-06 23-Apr-06 Date of Prediction (Oct 1 Enrollment Cutoff) PredictedDateof200thEvent Region Based Model (Median) Trial Based Actual Stop  enrolling Stop  Randomizing Wait as  Patients   Relapse  or   Drop  out
  • 7. Another  Case  Study Management  feedback: “…  the  simulations  are  very  valuable  and  the  only   way  we  have  to  plan  our  timelines.  As  it  has   turned  out,  your  simulations  seems  to  be  pretty   accurate  ...” ...    We would have been guessing and  spinning   our wheels without them.” Date # Randomized Relapses  /  Dropouts Prediction: 101st Relapse 3 Aug’06 73 3  /  2 1  Dec …  15  June 6  Sep’06 182 16 /  7 12  Nov  …  21  Feb 2  Oct’06                                            Stopped  Enrolling  Patients        (NB:  3-­‐4  month  open  label)   Dec‘06                                                  Stopped  Randomizing  Patients  (All  eligible  or  discontinued) 1  Jan’07                                                                            101st Relapse  Event
  • 8. Examples Validation: Protocols A&B assumed: (50% randomized, 30% Relapse) rate Models estimated: Trial A: (33%, 37%) Trial B: (55%, 41%) Early  Issue  Identification              ⟶ Quick  Corrections Scenario:                                       ¿Add Sites to compensate for low enrollment? • Run  simulation  with  additional  sites • Compare  between  simulations Scenario:   EMEA  requested  secondary  endpoint  of  Late  Relapses  (>4wk  off  Tx),  Trial   A  had  stopped  enrolling.  Should  Trial  A  be  reopened?  Should  Trial  B  be  extended? • Build  new  endpoint  into  simulations • Report
  • 9. More   A  presentation  I  gave  at  JSM  2006  on  the  method,  with  a  proceedings  paper.   https://sites.google.com/site/dennissweitzer/home/modeling-­‐multiphase-­‐clinical-­‐trials-­‐time-­‐to-­‐completion-­‐ study-­‐management Simple  simulation  methods  using  Excel.  I’ve  long  used  Excel  simulations  to  aid  in   planning  clinical  trials  (for  quick  &  transparent  models),  although  methods  for  doing   so  are  not  well  publicized.  Here’s  a  presentation  of  how-­‐to: https://sites.google.com/site/dennissweitzer/home/quick-­‐simple-­‐simulation-­‐using-­‐ms-­‐excel