Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Surname 1Question 2Terracotta krater Attributed to the Hirsc.docx
1. Surname 1
Question 2
Terracotta krater Attributed to the Hirschfeld Workshop Period:
Geometric Date: ca. 750–735 B.C. Culture: Greek, Attic
Medium: Terracotta Dimensions: H. 42 5/8 in. (108.3 cm)
diameter 28 1/2 in. (72.4 cm)
Stele of Naram-Sin
From Sippar; found at Susa (present-day Shush, Iran). Naram-
Sin r. 2254-2218 BCE. Limestone,
Height 6’66’’ (1.98 m). Musee du Louvre, Paris.
Thesis: The Terracotta krater and the Victory Stele of Naram-
Sin are both a representation of the specific cultural and
historical events during that time. The Terracotta krater was a
large vase that was often decorated with funerary
representation. Consequently, the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin
was a symbol of the gods of Akkadians and how their king,
Naram-Sin, defeated the Lullubi people of present-day Iran.
Both images are a representation of some of the military
exploits and practices of individuals during ancient times. The
Terracotta krater has figures that of the deceased with shields
and chariots and this is a representation of the military
escapades of the community in question. Further, the painting
and scene on the large vases evoked some glorious ancestry and
traditions to which the dead man belonged thus upholding
cultural practices through the paintings. Also, the Victory Stele
of Naram-Sin monument is a representation of the military
successes of Naram-Sin and his soldiers with the help of his
steel. King Naram-Sin had great military authority as depicted
in the monument.
Also, both of these pieces of art were made from stone with
6. Mary and the child enthroned among the Saints Theodor of
Amasea
and George and angels. Encaustic icon from the end of the 6th
century.
Reliquary Tabernacle with
Virgin and Child
Artist: Naddo Ceccarelli (active
ca. 1330–60)
Date: ca. 1350
Material: Tempera, gold, and
glass on panel
Dimensions: 62.1 x 43.2 x 9.4
cm
Provenance: Arnold Seligmann,
Rey and Co., New York (date
and mode of acquisition
unknown); Henry Walters,
Baltimore, 1920, by purchase;
Walters Art Museum, 1931, by
bequest.
Question 5
10. Material: stone
Title: The Palette of Narmer (front) Date: 1st dynasty, circa
3000 BCE Material: slate
Measurements: height: 63.5 cm
Description: From Hierakonpolis, Kom el-Ahmar
Midterm Short Answer
You will write a two-sentence thesis and 3-5 comparative
points. Each point should explain: 1. HOW the images look
(similarity or difference)
2. WHY the formal similarity or difference exists.
Sample Response
Thesis: The Warka Vase, a Sumerian Vase made around 3,000
BCE, and The Palette of Narmer an Egyptian palette from
roughly the same period, represent divine figures in shallow
relief. While the Warka vase represents a space that is similar to
the temple where the vase was found, the Narmer palette
commemorates a specific, historical event and its immediate
aftermath.
· Both objects represent a procession of figures. [note the
comparative points don’t have to be in complete sentences. But
they should be comparative points that support the topic
sentence, which support the thesis.]
· In the Narmer Palette, these figures are walking to next to the
ruler to survey two rows of decapitated bodies, indicating his
military might.
· In the Warka Vase, the naked figures are moving in
continually in a circle below the god Inanna as they carry goods
to her as offering.
· The authority of the divine figure is indicated by the fact that
they are the largest figures represented.
· In the Warka Vase, Inanna is the largest figure and placed at
the top of the vase, suggesting that the lower registers are
moving to her.
· In the Narmer palette, Narmer is large and in the center of the
image, suggesting that he is connected to all of the figures
11. represented.
· The figures in both objects are separated in different registers.
· In the Warka vase, the compartmentalization of space happens
in four separate planes that do not intersect.
· in the Narmer palette, the figures seem distinct, but they are
more commingled. Narmer’s enemies are never perpendicular to
the horizontal ground lines.
· The figures and objects in the Warka vase are represented
moving around the vase, which is like the movement of the
viewers to her temple. The Narmer Palette represents a series of
scenes that are all tied together, but in no clear or linear order.
The viewer has to put the pieces of the story together.
(ADDING MORE HISTORICAL DETAILS TO THIS OUTLINE
WOULD BE VERY GOOD, for example, unification of Upper
and Lower Egypt, etc.) But this is the basic structure you will
want to follow: comparison of visual facts and some
formal/historical interpretation.
Some questions you MIGHT consider for the final exam
comparisons.
Question 1
How is the worshiper invited to engage with these images? To
what extent do these objects
invite the viewer to think about the story of a saint’s life?
Question 2
How is a holy body represented? How is the viewer invited to
think about sacred bodies?
12. Question 3
How does the arrangement of the figures guide the viewer’s
gaze? What kinds of spiritual
meanings are produced after the viewer has understood the
relationship between the figures
represented?
Question 4
How are holy bodies represented? What theological meanings
are tied to the formal aspects of
the images?
Question 5
To what extent do these objects reference styles of past art?
Why is the reference to past art
important in these objects? How are viewers invited to interact
with the image?
Question 6
How does the arrangement of the figures guide the viewer’s
gaze? What kinds of spiritual
meanings are produced after the viewer has understood the
relationship between the figures
represented?
Question 7
How should we understand the visual complexity of these
images? What types of stories are
being told? How are these stories communicated visually?
Question 8
13. Why are there multiple versions of the same holy bodies
represented in the same image? How
do these bodies create a sense of the importance of specific
geographic locations?