ABGB 302: Week 5 Case Study Assignment Summarize the case study presented in the F. Meyer Currency hedging practices. Secondly, critique the effectiveness of F. Meyer’s current hedging practices—F. Meyer Imports: Hedging Foreign Currency ExchangeRisk Case study. (Min. 240 words). AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Fall B – 2018 Evaluation Criteria Excellent Very Good Adequate Needs Improvement No Credit Content (18 points) Complete and organized submissions that adhere to all assignment instructions. Submission is missing minor elements and/or is not well- organized and/or missed an assignment instructions. Submission is missing minor elements and/or is not well- organized and/or missed an assignment instructions. Submission is missing elements and/or is not well-organized and/or did not adhere to assignment instructions. Did not submit or submission unacceptable. 18 13.5 9 4.5 0 Application (18 points) High quality submissions that clearly demonstrate understanding of course materials. Thorough understanding of foreign currency risk, hedging, effectiveness of hedging practices in international currency market. Good submissions with some connections to course materials. Occasionally contributes ideas, relevant personal experience, materials and/or comments. Moderate explanation of foreign currency risk, hedging, effectiveness of hedging practices in international currency market. Good submissions with some connections to course materials. Occasionally contributes ideas, relevant personal experience, materials and/or comments. Adequate explanation of foreign currency risk, hedging, effectiveness of hedging practices in international currency market. Little to no evidence that course materials are understood or incorporated into submissions. Poor explanation of foreign currency risk, hedging, effectiveness of hedging practices in international currency market. Did not submit or submission unacceptable. 18 13.5 9 4.5 0 AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Spring B – 2018 Organization and Grammar (4 points) Properly formatted submissions demonstrating professional, college- level tone, no spelling or grammar errors and well- documented sources (when applicable). Submission may be lacking proper formatting or professional tone or may contain minor spelling/ grammar errors or is not well- supported (when applicable). Submission may be lacking proper formatting or professional tone or may contain minor spelling/ grammar errors or is not well- supported (when applicable). Submission may be lacking proper formatting and/or professional tone and/or may contain multiple spelling/grammar errors and/or is not well-supported (when applicable). Did not submit or submission unacceptable. 4 3 2 1 0 ...

1. ABGB 302: Week 5 Case Study Assignment
Summarize the case study presented in the F. Meyer Currency
hedging practices. Secondly, critique the effectiveness of F.
Meyer’s current hedging practices—F. Meyer Imports: Hedging
Foreign Currency ExchangeRisk Case study. (Min. 240 words).
AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Fall B – 2018
Evaluation Criteria Excellent Very Good Adequate Needs
Improvement No Credit
Content
(18 points)
Complete and
organized
submissions that
adhere to all
assignment
instructions.
Submission is missing
minor elements
and/or is not well-
organized and/or
missed an
assignment
instructions.

2. Submission is missing
minor elements
and/or is not well-
organized and/or
missed an assignment
instructions.
Submission is missing
elements and/or is
not well-organized
and/or did not adhere
to assignment
instructions.
Did not submit or
submission
unacceptable.
18 13.5 9 4.5 0
Application
(18 points)
High quality
submissions that
clearly demonstrate
understanding of
course materials.
Thorough

3. understanding of
foreign currency risk,
hedging,
effectiveness of
hedging practices in
international
currency market.
Good submissions
with some
connections to
course materials.
Occasionally
contributes ideas,
relevant personal
experience, materials
and/or comments.
Moderate
explanation of
foreign currency risk,
hedging,
effectiveness of
hedging practices in
international
currency market.

4. Good submissions
with some
connections to course
materials.
Occasionally
contributes ideas,
relevant personal
experience, materials
and/or comments.
Adequate explanation
of foreign currency
risk, hedging,
effectiveness of
hedging practices in
international currency
market.
Little to no evidence
that course materials
are understood or
incorporated into
submissions. Poor
explanation of foreign
currency risk, hedging,
effectiveness of
hedging practices in

5. international currency
market.
Did not submit or
submission
unacceptable.
18 13.5 9 4.5 0
AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Spring B – 2018
Organization and
Grammar
(4 points)
Properly formatted
submissions
demonstrating
professional, college-
level tone, no
spelling or grammar
errors and well-
documented sources
(when applicable).
Submission may be
lacking proper
formatting or

6. professional tone or
may contain minor
spelling/ grammar
errors or is not well-
supported (when
applicable).
Submission may be
lacking proper
formatting or
professional tone or
may contain minor
spelling/ grammar
errors or is not well-
supported (when
applicable).
Submission may be
lacking proper
formatting and/or
professional tone
and/or may contain
multiple
spelling/grammar
errors and/or is not
well-supported (when

7. applicable).
Did not submit or
submission
unacceptable.
4 3 2 1 0