canaman camarines sur 2009 local economic indicators

1. Canaman, Camarines Sur
CY 2009 State of Local Governance
& CBMS Highlights
Bago City, Negros Occidental
Comprehensive Development Planning 2010

2. An Canaman
Aggregate Area: 4,327.2901 hectares
Municipality of Magarao
9 urban
barangays
Municipality of 15 rural barangays
Libmanan
Naga City
Municipality of Municipality of Camaligan
Pamplona
Municipality of Gainza
Population: 29,933; Households: 6,533
* 96.10% or 4,158.53 hectares is relatively flat (0-3% slope)

3. Outline
• State of Local Governance Performance – the
obtaining capacity level of the LGU and the
circumstances that bear upon it
• Financial Performance – information on LGU’s
revenue generation, revenue allocation &
utilization
• State of Local Development – the obtaining
development conditions and the
factors/circumstances that have influenced such
Presented in graphs, percentages or figures based on pre-defined indicators & performance scale

4. State of Performance:
ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE
Very High
High
Fair
Low
Very Low
• 7th among the 13 fourth class municipalities & 22nd
among the 36 component LGUs of the province
STATE OF PERFORMANCE : Administrative Governance

5. State of Performance
ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE – Priority Areas of Concern
• On Local Legislation: 1) Enactment of vital codes (e.g. Code for
Children, Code of General Ordinances, Environmental Code, etc.); 2)
Enhancement of Legislative Tracking System (e.g. computerization);
and 3) Review/updating of ordinances
• Revenue Generation: 1) Formulation of Annual Revenue Generation
Plan; 2) Improvement of system on LGU-imposed or collected taxes,
fees & charges; 3) Improvement of RPT collection system; 4)
Enhancement of Local Revenue base
• On Development Planning: 1) Strengthening of the Municipal Dev’t
Council; 2) Enhancement of database; 3) Formulation/Updating of plans
• On Resource Allocation & Utilization: Strict adherence to regulations/
mandatory requirements (i.e. 20% EDF utilization, PS ceiling, GAD &
Local Council for the Protection of Children allocation, etc.)
What are the Priority Areas of Concern?

6. State of Performance
ADMINISTRATIVE GOVERNANCE – Priority Areas of Concern
• On Human Resource Management and Development: Enhance-
ment/institutionalization of HRMD practices: Transparency in recruitment
and selection, stability in employment, recognition of good performance,
promotion of professional growth, and ease of being heard through a
personnel grievance system
• On Customer Service – Civil Applications: 1) Enhancement of the
civil application system ( i.e. transform into a seamless transactional
process); 2) Enhancement/strengthening of the Public Assistance Desk;
3) Enhancement/installation of computerized database system (real
property, civil registry, etc.)
• Over-arching concern: Is our present organizational structure and
staffing pattern – which is a vital component of governance, at
par/ready/responsive to the needs?
What are the Priority Areas of Concern?

7. State of Performance:
SOCIAL GOVERNANCE
Very High
High
Fair
Low
Very Low
• 2nd among the 13 fourth class municipalities & 10th
among the 36 component LGUs of the province
STATE OF PERFORMANCE : Social Governance

8. State of Performance
SOCIAL GOVERNANCE – Priority Areas of Concern
• On Support to Health Services: 1) Strengthening of the Local Health
Board; 2) Enhancement of primary health care (basic curative) service
• On Support to Education Services: 1) Strengthening of Local School
Board; 2) Strict adherence to SEF utilization & expense prioritization; 3)
Strengthen support to basic education (e.g. scholarship program,
extension classes, etc.) and alternative learning system
• On Support to Housing & Basic Utilities: 1) Updating of inventory of
sites for potential socialized housing; 2) Validation of database (e.g.
informal settlers, households with access to water/electricity supply, etc)
• On Peace, Security & Disaster Risk Mgt: 1) Strengthen Peace &
Order Council, Council for the Protection of Children & Disaster
Coordinating Council; 2) Ensure annual allocation to the Katarungang
Pambarangay; 3) Enhance LGU readiness to manage disaster risks
What are the Priority Areas of Concern?

9. State of Performance:
ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE
Very High
High
Fair
Low
Very Low
• 7th among the 13 fourth class municipalities & 15th
among the 36 component LGUs of the province
STATE OF PERFORMANCE : Economic Governance

10. State of Performance:
ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE: Priority Areas of Concern
• On Support to Agriculture Sector: 1) Improvement of infrastructure
support (e.g. communal irrigation system, farm-to-market roads/bridges,
postharvest facilities); 2) Improve credit facilitation services to farmers;
3) Improve market development services (e.g. trade fairs, exhibits,
missions & congress); 4) Enhance assistance to research &
development
• On Entrepreneurship, Business & Industry Promotion: 1) Improve
the quality of permitting/licensing system; 2) Ensure the ease of doing
business (i.e. in getting permits); 3) Establish an administrative support
body to take the lead in marketing the investment potentials of the local
government; 4) Provide/cause the provision of, direct support services to
business, particularly those categorized as micro, small and medium
enterprises (e.g. tax incentives, product labeling, product packaging,
training, job fairs and trade fairs)
What are the priority areas of concern?

11. State of Performance:
ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE
Very High
High
Fair
Low
Very Low
• 7th among the 13 fourth class municipalities & 14th
among the 36 component LGUs of the province
STATE OF PERFORMANCE : Environmental Governance

12. State of Performance:
ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE: Priority Areas of Concern
• On Freshwater Ecosystem Management: 1) Strengthen
partnership with Civil Society Organizations and citizen
participation in freshwater ecosystem management; 2)
Review/update target areas for rehabilitation and protection
• On Urban Ecosystem Management: 1) Strengthen the
Solid Waste Management Board; 2) Improve/update the
Solid Waste Management Plan; 3) Ensure that every
barangay has a Materials Recovery Facility; 4) Improve
Solid Waste Collection Practices; 5) Ensure that no open
dumpsite facility exist
STATE OF PERFORMANCE : Environmental Governance

13. State of Performance:
VALUING FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE
Very High
High
Fair
Low
Very Low
• 10th among the 13 fourth class municipalities & 31st
among the 36 component LGUs of the province
STATE OF PERFORMANCE : Fundamentals of Good Governance

14. State of Performance:
VALUING FUNDAMENTALS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE
• On Participation: Engage the citizens and civil society
organizations in governance much more effectively
• On Transparency: 1) Maximize communication channels
(e.g. Bulletin board, Public Information Desk, print &
broadcast media, etc.) in communication information such
as plans, programs, services, etc.; 2) Enhance/update the
website
• On Financial Accountability: Strengthen administrative
capacity to ensure observance of guidelines relative to
accounting & internal control, procurement & financial
transactions
STATE OF PERFORMANCE : Fundamentals of Good Governance

15. Financial Performance:
REVENUE GENERATION
Cost in collecting revenue/total local
revenues collected

16. Financial Performance:
REVENUE GENERATION
Amount of locally-sourced revenue
Amount of locally-sourced revenue /
population

17. Financial Performance:
REVENUE GENERATION
Amount of RPT collected / amount of
projected RPT

18. Financial Performance:
RESOURCE ALLOCATION & UTILIZATION
Actual debt service cost/regular income
Should not exceed 20% of the regular income (the debt
servicing limitation set for under LG Code of 1991)

19. Financial Performance:
RESOURCE ALLOCATION & UTILIZATION
Total expenditures/population
Describes how much was actually spent by the
LGU in a per capita basis.

20. Financial Performance:
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE - Priority Areas of Concern
• On Revenue Generation: 1) Increase locally-sourced
income; 2) Increase cost-collection efficiency
• On Resource Allocation & Utilization: 1) Sustain
compliance with statutory requirements, especially on
budget ceilings; 2) Carefully explore possibilities to take
advantage of the relatively large percentage of debt
servicing capacity
What are the Priority Areas of Concern?

21. State of Local Development
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Very High
High
Fair
Low
Very Low

22. State of Local Development
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT – Health & Nutrition
Malnutrition Rate (0-5 years old): below 10% (CBMS Data: 2.3%)
Morbidity Rate for leading illnesses: within acceptable condition per
national standards
Crude Death Rate: 1 per 1,000 population
Maternal Mortality Rate: 0.3% or below per 1,000 live births (CBMS
Data: 0.3%)
Infant Mortality Rate: 6-14 per 1,000 live births
Children Mortality Rate: 11-29 per 1,000 live births (CBMS Data: 0.7%)
Malnutrition Rate, Morbidity Rate, Crude Death Rate, Maternal
Mortality Rate & Infant/Children Mortality Rate are all within
the acceptable standards of the DOH. Sustain the efforts
and aim for ideal and desirable condition.
State of Health & Nutrition – Priority Areas of Concern

23. State of Local Development
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT – Education
Elementary Participation Rate: 85-91% (CBMS Data: 84%)
Elementary Completion Rate: 78-88%
Secondary Participation Rate: 65% CBMS Data
Secondary Completion Rate: 60-70%
Tertiary or Technical Education Completion Rate: 25-50%
Simple Literacy Rate: 95-97% (CBMS Data: 97.81%)
Exert more effort to improve the situation.
Quality of human capital is at risk!
State of Education – Priority Areas of Concern

24. State of Local Development
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT – Housing & Basic Utilities
% of squatters: 5% or below (CBMS Data: 4%)
% of HHs living in makeshift housing: >2% (CBMS Data: 7.6%)
% of HHs w/ access to piped-in water: <30% (CBMS Data: 68%)
% of HHs w/ sanitary toilet: 86-91% (CBMS Data: 91.9%)
% of HHs w/ electricity: 80-90% (CBMS Data: 85%)
Exert more effort to improve the situation.
Quality of life is at stake!
State of Housing & Basic Utilities – Priority Areas of Concern

25. State of Local Development
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT – Peace & Order
Incidence of Index Crime (i.e. murder, homicide,
physical injury, rape, robbery & theft): more than 8 per
10,000 population (benchmark is 5-6 per 10,000)
Incidence of non-index Crime (e.g. crimes against
public order, public morals, illegal gambling, illegal
drugs, violation of special laws, carnapping, etc.):
more than 6 per 10,000 population (benchmark is 3-4
per 10,000 population)
Exert more effort to improve the situation.
Quality of life is at stake!
State of Peace & Order – Priority Areas of Concern

26. State of Local Development
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Very High
High
Fair
Low
Very Low

27. State of Local Development
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT – State of Employment & Income
Unemployment Rate: 0-2% (CBMS Data: 1.6%)
Underemployment Rate: 16-20% (benchmark: should not be
higher than 20%)
Income per Capita: 20,000 – 34,000 (benchmark: should not
be lower than P35,000)
Poverty Incidence: 36-50% (benchmark: 26-35%; CBMS Data:
48.7%)
HHs living below food threshold: 34.2% CBMS Data
Exert more effort to improve the situation.
Quality of life is at stake!
State of Employment & Income – Priority Areas of Concern

28. State of Local Development
ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT
Very High
High
Fair
Low
Very Low

29. State of Local Development
ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT – Urban Ecosystems
% of tree cover in Urban Areas (town center): 10-20%
(benchmark: at least 20%)
% of polluting industries: 0%
Smog, odor & noise in town center: NONE
Solid waste heaps on roadsides & vacant/idle lots & in
urban lands: Present in some spots & sites (benchmark:
this should not occur)
Exert more effort to improve the situation.
Quality of life is at stake!
State of Urban Ecosystems – Priority Areas of Concern

30. State of Local Development
ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT – Agricultural Ecosystems
% of irrigated lands to total irrigable lands: 40-
50% (benchmark: 40-50%)
% prime lands converted to non-agricultural
uses: <5% (benchmark: should not be more than
5%)
Exert more effort to improve the situation.
Food sufficiency is at stake!
State of Agricultural Ecosystems – Priority Areas of Concern

31. State of Local Development
ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT – Freshwater Ecosystems
Fish catch in river or lake: decreasing over the past 5 years
(benchmark: should be stable or increasing)
Freshwater quality: Water is turbid (light brown to brown color)
with floating wastes (benchmark: should be clear, without
water lilies and/or floating wastes)
Extent of Riverside Squatters: 6-20 houses per kilometer
(benchmark: should not be more than 20)
Exert more effort to improve the situation.
Quality of life is at stake!
State of Freshwater Ecosystems – Priority Areas of Concern

32. Dios Mabalos Po!
(Tenkyu!)
Tenkyu!)